81_FR_8930 81 FR 8895 - Recognizing European Union (EU) and EU Member State Regionalization Decisions for African Swine Fever (ASF) by Updating the APHIS List of Regions Affected With ASF

81 FR 8895 - Recognizing European Union (EU) and EU Member State Regionalization Decisions for African Swine Fever (ASF) by Updating the APHIS List of Regions Affected With ASF

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 35 (February 23, 2016)

Page Range8895-8896
FR Document2016-03675

We are advising the public that we added European Union (EU) and EU Member State-defined regions of the EU to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) list of regions affected with African swine fever (ASF). Going forward we will recognize as affected with ASF any region of the EU that the EU or any EU Member State has placed under restriction because of detection of ASF. These regions currently include portions of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, and all of Sardinia. APHIS will list the EU- and EU Member State-defined regions as a single entity. We also removed Sardinia as an individually listed region from the APHIS list of ASF affected regions. We took these actions because of the detection of ASF in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8895-8896]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03675]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / 
Notices

[[Page 8895]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2015-0011]


Recognizing European Union (EU) and EU Member State 
Regionalization Decisions for African Swine Fever (ASF) by Updating the 
APHIS List of Regions Affected With ASF

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that we added European Union (EU) 
and EU Member State-defined regions of the EU to the Animal and Plant 
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) list of regions affected with African 
swine fever (ASF). Going forward we will recognize as affected with ASF 
any region of the EU that the EU or any EU Member State has placed 
under restriction because of detection of ASF. These regions currently 
include portions of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, and all of 
Sardinia. APHIS will list the EU- and EU Member State-defined regions 
as a single entity. We also removed Sardinia as an individually listed 
region from the APHIS list of ASF affected regions. We took these 
actions because of the detection of ASF in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, 
and Poland.

DATES: Effective Date: The addition of the EU- and EU Member State-
defined regions to the APHIS list of regions affected with ASF was 
effective August 31, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Donald Link, Import Risk Analyst, 
Regionalization Evaluation Services, National Import Export Services, 
Veterinary Services, APHIS, 920 Main Campus Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh, 
NC 27606; (919) 855-7731; [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred 
to below as the regulations) govern the importation of certain animals 
and animal products into the United States to prevent the introduction 
of various animal diseases, including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth 
disease, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, swine vesicular disease, 
classical swine fever, and African swine fever (ASF). The regulations 
prohibit or restrict the importation of live ruminants and swine, and 
products from these animals, from regions where these diseases are 
considered to exist.
    Sections 94.8 and 94.17 of the regulations contain requirements 
governing the importation into the United States of pork and pork 
products from regions of the world where ASF exists or is reasonably 
believed to exist. A list of regions where ASF exists or is reasonably 
believed to exist is maintained on the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service (APHIS) Web site at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/animals_disease_status.shtml.
    In a notice published in the Federal Register on August 31, 2015 
(80 FR 52440-52441, Docket No. APHIS-2015-0011), we amended the list of 
regions where ASF exists or is reasonably believed to exist by adding a 
new entry that reads ``Any restricted zone in the European Union (EU) 
established by the EU or any EU Member State because of detection of 
African swine fever in domestic or feral swine.'' We also removed 
Sardinia as an individually listed region because Sardinia is under ASF 
restrictions by the EU. These list changes were effective August 31, 
2015, and as a result of that action, the importation into the United 
States of pork and pork products from EU regions under restrictions for 
ASF became restricted.
    The notice also proposed that APHIS would recognize as affected 
with ASF any region of the EU that the EU or any EU Member State has 
placed under restriction because of detection of ASF. Going forward, 
the APHIS-recognized ASF status of almost any region of the EU would 
follow the EU and EU Member State restrictions based on ASF detections; 
we would not list each affected region of the EU. The only exception 
would be Malta, which we currently recognize as affected with ASF, but 
which is not under ASF restrictions by the EU.
    Comments on the notice were required to be received on or before 
October 30, 2015. We received one comment, from a domestic pork 
industry association. The commenter did not object to the recognition 
of EU and EU Member State regionalization decisions for ASF in the EU. 
The commenter expressed concern that ASF continues to spread within the 
wild boar population, and concern that the potential exists for further 
spread. The commenter urged APHIS to remain extremely vigilant 
regarding actions by the European Commission (EC) and affected Member 
States to address ASF.
    APHIS agrees with the commenter that ASF continues to spread in 
wild boar, and that the potential exists for further spread. APHIS 
agrees with the commenter that we should remain extremely vigilant 
regarding actions taken by the EC and affected Member States to address 
ASF. APHIS will continue monitor the epidemiological situation. If the 
EU or an EU Member State significantly changes or entirely removes its 
ASF restrictions or otherwise significantly alters its regulatory 
framework for ASF, APHIS will conduct an evaluation to assess the 
impact of the changes on the risk of ASF introduction into the United 
States. APHIS will present for public comment the findings of any such 
evaluation.
    Because the EU- and EU Member State-defined ASF-affected regions 
include areas not currently on the APHIS list of ASF-affected regions, 
we added the new entry to our list effective August 31, 2015, to 
prevent the introduction of ASF into the United States. The list of 
ASF-affected regions can be found at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/animals_disease_status.shtml. Copies of the list 
are also available via postal mail, fax, or email upon request to the 
Regionalization Evaluation Services, National Import Export Services, 
Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 
River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.


[[Page 8896]]


    Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of February 2016.
 Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-03675 Filed 2-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-34-P



                                                                                                                                                                                                     8895

                                                  Notices                                                                                                       Federal Register
                                                                                                                                                                Vol. 81, No. 35

                                                                                                                                                                Tuesday, February 23, 2016



                                                  This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:       The                  ASF, but which is not under ASF
                                                  contains documents other than rules or                  regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to             restrictions by the EU.
                                                  proposed rules that are applicable to the               below as the regulations) govern the
                                                  public. Notices of hearings and investigations,                                                                  Comments on the notice were
                                                                                                          importation of certain animals and                    required to be received on or before
                                                  committee meetings, agency decisions and                animal products into the United States
                                                  rulings, delegations of authority, filing of                                                                  October 30, 2015. We received one
                                                  petitions and applications and agency
                                                                                                          to prevent the introduction of various                comment, from a domestic pork
                                                  statements of organization and functions are            animal diseases, including rinderpest,                industry association. The commenter
                                                  examples of documents appearing in this                 foot-and-mouth disease, bovine                        did not object to the recognition of EU
                                                  section.                                                spongiform encephalopathy, swine
                                                                                                                                                                and EU Member State regionalization
                                                                                                          vesicular disease, classical swine fever,
                                                                                                                                                                decisions for ASF in the EU. The
                                                                                                          and African swine fever (ASF). The
                                                                                                                                                                commenter expressed concern that ASF
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               regulations prohibit or restrict the
                                                                                                                                                                continues to spread within the wild
                                                                                                          importation of live ruminants and
                                                  Animal and Plant Health Inspection                                                                            boar population, and concern that the
                                                                                                          swine, and products from these animals,
                                                  Service                                                 from regions where these diseases are                 potential exists for further spread. The
                                                                                                          considered to exist.                                  commenter urged APHIS to remain
                                                  [Docket No. APHIS–2015–0011]                                                                                  extremely vigilant regarding actions by
                                                                                                             Sections 94.8 and 94.17 of the
                                                                                                          regulations contain requirements                      the European Commission (EC) and
                                                  Recognizing European Union (EU) and
                                                  EU Member State Regionalization                         governing the importation into the                    affected Member States to address ASF.
                                                  Decisions for African Swine Fever                       United States of pork and pork products                  APHIS agrees with the commenter
                                                  (ASF) by Updating the APHIS List of                     from regions of the world where ASF                   that ASF continues to spread in wild
                                                  Regions Affected With ASF                               exists or is reasonably believed to exist.            boar, and that the potential exists for
                                                                                                          A list of regions where ASF exists or is              further spread. APHIS agrees with the
                                                  AGENCY:  Animal and Plant Health                        reasonably believed to exist is                       commenter that we should remain
                                                  Inspection Service, USDA.                               maintained on the Animal and Plant                    extremely vigilant regarding actions
                                                  ACTION: Notice.                                         Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Web                 taken by the EC and affected Member
                                                                                                          site at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/                    States to address ASF. APHIS will
                                                  SUMMARY:    We are advising the public                  import_export/animals/animals_                        continue monitor the epidemiological
                                                  that we added European Union (EU) and                   disease_status.shtml.                                 situation. If the EU or an EU Member
                                                  EU Member State-defined regions of the                     In a notice published in the Federal               State significantly changes or entirely
                                                  EU to the Animal and Plant Health                       Register on August 31, 2015 (80 FR                    removes its ASF restrictions or
                                                  Inspection Service (APHIS) list of                      52440–52441, Docket No. APHIS–2015–                   otherwise significantly alters its
                                                  regions affected with African swine                     0011), we amended the list of regions                 regulatory framework for ASF, APHIS
                                                  fever (ASF). Going forward we will                      where ASF exists or is reasonably                     will conduct an evaluation to assess the
                                                  recognize as affected with ASF any                      believed to exist by adding a new entry               impact of the changes on the risk of ASF
                                                  region of the EU that the EU or any EU                  that reads ‘‘Any restricted zone in the               introduction into the United States.
                                                  Member State has placed under                           European Union (EU) established by the
                                                  restriction because of detection of ASF.                                                                      APHIS will present for public comment
                                                                                                          EU or any EU Member State because of                  the findings of any such evaluation.
                                                  These regions currently include                         detection of African swine fever in
                                                  portions of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania,                                                                          Because the EU- and EU Member
                                                                                                          domestic or feral swine.’’ We also
                                                  and Poland, and all of Sardinia. APHIS                                                                        State-defined ASF-affected regions
                                                                                                          removed Sardinia as an individually
                                                  will list the EU- and EU Member State-                                                                        include areas not currently on the
                                                                                                          listed region because Sardinia is under
                                                  defined regions as a single entity. We                                                                        APHIS list of ASF-affected regions, we
                                                                                                          ASF restrictions by the EU. These list
                                                  also removed Sardinia as an                                                                                   added the new entry to our list effective
                                                                                                          changes were effective August 31, 2015,
                                                  individually listed region from the                                                                           August 31, 2015, to prevent the
                                                                                                          and as a result of that action, the
                                                  APHIS list of ASF affected regions. We                                                                        introduction of ASF into the United
                                                                                                          importation into the United States of
                                                  took these actions because of the                       pork and pork products from EU regions                States. The list of ASF-affected regions
                                                  detection of ASF in Estonia, Latvia,                    under restrictions for ASF became                     can be found at: http://
                                                  Lithuania, and Poland.                                  restricted.                                           www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/
                                                  DATES: Effective Date: The addition of                     The notice also proposed that APHIS                animals/animals_disease_status.shtml.
                                                  the EU- and EU Member State-defined                     would recognize as affected with ASF                  Copies of the list are also available via
                                                  regions to the APHIS list of regions                    any region of the EU that the EU or any               postal mail, fax, or email upon request
                                                  affected with ASF was effective August                  EU Member State has placed under                      to the Regionalization Evaluation
                                                  31, 2015.                                               restriction because of detection of ASF.              Services, National Import Export
                                                                                                                                                                Services, Veterinary Services, Animal
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.                    Going forward, the APHIS-recognized
                                                  Donald Link, Import Risk Analyst,                       ASF status of almost any region of the                and Plant Health Inspection Service,
                                                  Regionalization Evaluation Services,                    EU would follow the EU and EU                         4700 River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD
                                                  National Import Export Services,                        Member State restrictions based on ASF                20737.
                                                  Veterinary Services, APHIS, 920 Main                    detections; we would not list each                      Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781–
                                                  Campus Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC                    affected region of the EU. The only                   7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
                                                  27606; (919) 855–7731; Donald.B.Link@                   exception would be Malta, which we                    136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
                                                  aphis.usda.gov.                                         currently recognize as affected with                  371.4.



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:06 Feb 22, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM   23FEN1


                                                  8896                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Notices

                                                    Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of              Farm Service Agency                                   collected from Farm Service Agency
                                                  February 2016.                                                                                                (FSA) Minor Program borrowers who
                                                                                                             Title: Agricultural Foreign Investment
                                                  Kevin Shea,
                                                                                                          Disclosure Act Report.                                may be individual farmers or farming
                                                  Administrator, Animal and Plant Health                     OMB Control Number: 0560–0097.                     partnerships, associations, or
                                                  Inspection Service.                                        Summary of Collection: The                         corporations.
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–03675 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]             Agricultural Foreign Investment                          Need and Use of the Information: FSA
                                                  BILLING CODE 3410–34–P                                  Disclosure Act of 1978 (AFIDA) requires               will collect information related to a
                                                                                                          foreign investors to report in a timely               program benefit recipient or loan
                                                                                                          manner all held, acquired, or transferred             borrower requesting action on security
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               U.S. agricultural land under penalty of               they own, which was purchased with
                                                                                                                                                                FSA loan funds, improved with FSA
                                                                                                          law to Farm Service Agency (FSA).
                                                  Farm Service Agency                                                                                           loan funds or has otherwise been
                                                                                                          Authority for the collection of the
                                                                                                                                                                mortgaged to FSA to secure a
                                                  Submission for OMB Review;                              information was delegated by the
                                                                                                                                                                Government loan. The information
                                                  Comment Request                                         Secretary of Agriculture to the Farm
                                                                                                                                                                collected is primarily financial data,
                                                                                                          Service Agency (FSA). The statute of
                                                  February 17, 2016.                                                                                            such as borrower’s asset values, current
                                                                                                          authority is 92 STAT (1263–1267) or 7
                                                    The Department of Agriculture has                                                                           financial information and public use
                                                                                                          U.S.C. 3501–3508 or Public Law 95–
                                                  submitted the following information                                                                           and employment data. Failure to obtain
                                                                                                          460. Foreign investors may obtain form
                                                  collection requirement(s) to OMB for                                                                          this information at the time of the
                                                                                                          FSA–153, AFIDA Report, from their
                                                  review and clearance under the                                                                                request for servicing will result in
                                                                                                          local FSA county office or from the FSA
                                                  Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,                                                                              rejection of the borrower’s request.
                                                                                                          Internet site.                                           Description of Respondents: Farms;
                                                  Public Law 104–13. Comments are                            Need and Use of the Information: The
                                                                                                                                                                Individuals or households; Business or
                                                  required regarding (1) whether the                      information collected from the AFIDA
                                                                                                                                                                other-for-profit; Not-for-profit
                                                  collection of information is necessary                  Reports is used to monitor the effect of
                                                                                                                                                                institutions; State. Local and Tribal
                                                  for the proper performance of the                       foreign investment upon family farms
                                                                                                                                                                Government.
                                                  functions of the agency, including                      and rural communities and in the                         Number of Respondents: 58.
                                                  whether the information will have                       preparation of a voluntary report to                     Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
                                                  practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the              Congress and the President. Congress                  On occasion; Annually.
                                                  agency’s estimate of burden including                   reviews the report and decides if                        Total Burden Hours: 37.
                                                  the validity of the methodology and                     regulatory action is necessary to limit
                                                  assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance                   the amount of foreign investment in                   Ruth Brown,
                                                  the quality, utility and clarity of the                 U.S. agricultural land. If this                       Departmental Information Collection
                                                  information to be collected; and (4)                    information was not collected, USDA                   Clearance Officer.
                                                  ways to minimize the burden of the                      could not effectively monitor foreign                 [FR Doc. 2016–03676 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  collection of information on those who                  investment and the impact of such                     BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
                                                  are to respond, including through the                   holdings upon family farms and rural
                                                  use of appropriate automated,                           communities.
                                                  electronic, mechanical, or other                           Description of Respondents: Business               DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
                                                  technological collection techniques or                  or other for-profit; Individuals or
                                                                                                                                                                Food Safety and Inspection Service
                                                  other forms of information technology.                  households; Farms.
                                                    Comments regarding this information                      Number of Respondents: 5,525.                      [Docket No. FSIS–2016–0005]
                                                  collection received by March 24, 2016                      Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
                                                  will be considered. Written comments                    On occasion; Annually.                                National Advisory Committee on Meat
                                                  should be addressed to: Desk Officer for                   Total Burden Hours: 2,631.                         and Poultry Inspection
                                                  Agriculture, Office of Information and                     Title: Servicing Minor Program Loans.              AGENCY:  Food Safety and Inspection
                                                  Regulatory Affairs, Office of                              OMB Control Number: 0560–0230.                     Service, USDA.
                                                  Management and Budget (OMB), New                           Summary of Collection: Farm Loan                   ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
                                                  Executive Office Building, 725—17th                     Program staff provides supervised credit
                                                  Street NW., Washington, DC 20502.                       in the form of loans to family farmers                SUMMARY:   The Food Safety and
                                                  Commenters are encouraged to submit                     and ranchers to purchase land and                     Inspection Service (FSIS) is announcing
                                                  their comments to OMB via email to:                     finance agricultural production.                      that the National Advisory Committee
                                                  OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or                          Regulations are promulgated to                        on Meat and Poultry Inspection
                                                  fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental                  implement selected provisions of                      (NACMPI) is sponsoring a public
                                                  Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail                      sections 331 and 335 of the                           meeting on March 29–30, 2016. The
                                                  Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–                        Consolidated Farm and Rural                           objective of the public meeting is to
                                                  7602. Copies of the submission(s) may                   Development Act. Section 331                          review and determine the steps FSIS
                                                  be obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.                  authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture               should take to ensure better Listeria
                                                    An agency may not conduct or                          to grant releases from personal liability             monocytogenes (Lm) control at retail.
                                                  sponsor a collection of information                     where security property is transferred to             FSIS is seeking input on whether FSIS
                                                  unless the collection of information                    approve applicants who, under                         should require certain actions by retail
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  displays a currently valid OMB control                  agreement, assume the outstanding                     stores. FSIS will ask the Committee to
                                                  number and the agency informs                           secured indebtedness. Section 335                     consider the following: (1) Should FSIS
                                                  potential persons who are to respond to                 provides servicing authority for real                 rely on regulation, the Food Code, or
                                                  the collection of information that such                 estate security; operation or lease of                some other means to effect these
                                                  persons are not required to respond to                  realty, disposition of surplus property;              actions? (2) Are there sources of
                                                  the collection of information unless it                 conveyance of complete interest of the                information that FSIS should consider
                                                  displays a currently valid OMB control                  United States; easements; and                         when deciding on what steps to take
                                                  number.                                                 condemnations. The information is                     that the Agency has not identified?


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:06 Feb 22, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM   23FEN1



Document Created: 2018-02-02 14:33:22
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 14:33:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesEffective Date: The addition of the EU- and EU Member State- defined regions to the APHIS list of regions affected with ASF was effective August 31, 2015.
ContactMr. Donald Link, Import Risk Analyst, Regionalization Evaluation Services, National Import Export Services, Veterinary Services, APHIS, 920 Main Campus Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27606; (919) 855-7731; [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 8895 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR