81 FR 8943 - Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request-Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 35 (February 23, 2016)

In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA'') of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (``Commission'' or ``CPSC'') announces that the Commission has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') a request for extension of approval of a collection of information relating to testing and recordkeeping requirements in the Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers (16 CFR part 1205), approved previously under OMB Control No. 3041-0091. In the Federal Register of November 25, 2015 (80 FR 73735), the CPSC published a notice to announce the agency's intention to seek extension of approval of the collection of information. One commenter, Outdoor Power Equipment Institute (``OPEI'') stated that the estimated burden is underestimated as it is likely based on an outdated estimate of the U.S. market. According to OPEI data, accounting for 8 member manufacturers, 4.7 million walk-behind (gas) power lawn mowers were shipped in the U.S. during 2015. CPSC staff's estimate of the estimated reporting burden to industry to comply with the safety standard mainly is tied to the number of manufacturers and importers (25), number of production days in a year (130), and employee time per day per establishment required to conduct a reasonable testing program (3 hours) and preparation of product labels (1 hour). The information provided by OPEI's comment does not address the factors and assumptions leading to estimated burden hours for firms and the industry. The reported shipments of 4.7 million units in 2015 (by 8 OPEI members) would not lead us to conclude that estimated burden hours has been underestimated. In fact, the reported shipments in 2015 are lower than previous years in our possession (e.g., 6.5 million forecast for 2005). If OPEI has information related to the number of affected establishments, annual production days, and hours per production day required for testing and labeling, staff will review that information and revise the estimated information collection burden of the standard, as necessary. Accordingly, by publication of this notice, the Commission announces that CPSC has submitted to the OMB a request for extension of approval of that collection of information, without change.

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8943-8944]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

[Docket No. CPSC-2012-0058]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request--Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn 
Mowers

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (``PRA'') of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the Consumer Product 
Safety Commission (``Commission'' or ``CPSC'') announces that the 
Commission has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(``OMB'') a request for extension of approval of a collection of 
information relating to testing and recordkeeping requirements in the 
Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers (16 CFR part 1205), 
approved previously under OMB Control No. 3041-0091. In the Federal 
Register of November 25, 2015 (80 FR 73735), the CPSC published a 
notice to announce the agency's intention to seek extension of approval 
of the collection of information.
    One commenter, Outdoor Power Equipment Institute (``OPEI'') stated 
that the estimated burden is underestimated as it is likely based on an 
outdated estimate of the U.S. market. According to OPEI data, 
accounting for 8 member manufacturers, 4.7 million walk-behind (gas) 
power lawn mowers were shipped in the U.S. during 2015.
    CPSC staff's estimate of the estimated reporting burden to industry 
to comply with the safety standard mainly is tied to the number of 
manufacturers and importers (25), number of production days in a year 
(130), and employee time per day per establishment required to conduct 
a reasonable testing program (3 hours) and preparation of product 
labels (1 hour). The information provided by OPEI's comment does not 
address the factors and assumptions leading to estimated burden hours 
for firms and the industry. The reported shipments of 4.7 million units 
in 2015 (by 8 OPEI members) would not lead us to conclude that 
estimated burden hours has been underestimated. In fact, the reported 
shipments in 2015 are lower than previous years in our possession 
(e.g., 6.5 million forecast for 2005). If OPEI has information related 
to the number of affected establishments, annual production days, and 
hours per production day required for testing and labeling, staff will 
review that information and revise the estimated information collection 
burden of the standard, as necessary.
    Accordingly, by publication of this notice, the Commission 
announces that CPSC has submitted to the OMB a request for extension of 
approval of that collection of information, without change.

DATES: Written comments on this request for extension of approval of 
information collection requirements should be submitted by March 24, 
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments about this request by email: 
[email protected] or fax: 202-395-6881. Comments by mail 
should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the CPSC, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. In addition, 
written comments that are sent to OMB also should be submitted 
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, under Docket No. CPSC-
2012-0058.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product 
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 
504-7815, or by email to: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC has submitted the following currently 
approved collection of information to OMB for extension:
    Title: Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers.
    OMB Number: 3041-0091.
    Type of Review: Renewal of collection.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Affected Public: Manufacturers and importers of walk-behind power 
lawn mowers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 25 manufacturers and importers of 
walk-behind power lawn mowers have been identified.
    Estimated Time per Response: Walk-behind power lawn mowers are 
manufactured seasonally to meet demand. They are manufactured during an 
estimated 130 days out of the year. When they are manufactured, firms 
are required to test and maintain records of those tests. Three hours 
daily is estimated for testing and recordkeeping

[[Page 8944]]

per firm totaling 390 hours per firm (3 hours x 130 days). In addition, 
to produce labels and apply labels on the newly manufactured lawn 
mowers, one hour daily is estimated for each firm during the production 
cycle for a total of 130 hours per firm (1 hour x 130 days).
    Total Estimated Annual Burden: 9,750 hours on testing and 
recordkeeping (25 firms x 390 hours) and 3,250 hours for labeling (25 
firms x 130 hours) for a total annual burden of 13,000 hours per year.
    General Description of Collection: In 1979, the Commission issued 
the Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers (16 CFR part 
1205) to address blade contact injuries. Subpart B of the standard sets 
forth regulations prescribing requirements for a reasonable testing 
program to support certificates of compliance with the standard for 
walk-behind power lawn mowers. 16 CFR part 1205, subpart B.
    In addition, section 14(a) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires 
manufacturers, importers, and private labelers of a consumer product 
subject to a consumer product safety standard to issue a certificate 
stating that the product complies with all applicable consumer product 
safety standards. Section 14(a) of the CPSA also requires that the 
certificate of compliance must be based on a test of each product or 
upon a reasonable testing program. The information collection is 
necessary because these regulations require manufacturers and importers 
to establish and maintain records to demonstrate compliance with the 
requirements for testing and labeling to support the certification of 
compliance.

    Dated: February 18, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-03700 Filed 2-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P