81 FR 91116 - Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 242 (December 16, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 242 (December 16, 2016)
| Page Range | 91116-91118 | |
| FR Document | 2016-30306 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 242 (Friday, December 16, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 91116-91118] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-30306] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-869] Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013- 2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 17, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat rolled steel products from Japan.\1\ The review covers one company, Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. (Toyo Kohan). The period of review (POR) is November 19, 2013 through April 30, 2015. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, these final results do not differ from the Preliminary Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2015, 81 FR 39627 (June 17, 2016) (Preliminary Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective December 16, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Crossland or Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3362 or (202) 482-7924, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 17, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results.\2\ We received a case brief from Thomas Steel Strip Corporation (Petitioner) on [[Page 91117]] August 1, 2016,\3\ and a rebuttal brief from Toyo Kohan on August 12, 2016.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 39628. \3\ See Case Brief of Thomas Steel Strip Corporation, dated August 1, 2016 (Petitioner's Case Brief). \4\ See Letter from Toyo Kohan to the Department of Commerce regarding ``Toyo Kohan's Rebuttal Brief: Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel- Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan,'' dated August 12, 2016 (Toyo Kohan's Rebuttal Brief). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On October 13, 2016, the Department issued a memorandum extending the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review from October 15, 2016, to December 9, 2016.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Dena Crossland, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, through Scot Fullerton, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the subject of ``Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat- Rolled Steel Products from Japan: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping; 2013/2015,'' dated October 13, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products included in this order are flat-rolled, cold-reduced steel products, regardless of chemistry; whether or not in coils; either plated or coated with nickel or nickel-based alloys and subsequently annealed (i.e., ``diffusion-annealed''); whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other metallic or nonmetallic substances; and less than or equal to 2.0 mm in nominal thickness. For purposes of this order, ``nickel-based alloys'' include all nickel alloys with other metals in which nickel accounts for at least 80 percent of the alloy by volume. Imports of merchandise included in the scope of this order are classified primarily under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7212.50.0000 and 7210.90.6000, but may also be classified under HTSUS subheadings 7210.70.6090, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7219.90.0020, 7219.90.0025, 7219.90.0060, 7219.90.0080, 7220.90.0010, 7220.90.0015, 7225.99.0090, or 7226.99.0180. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.\6\ A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Administrative Review, 2013-2015: Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have not recalculated Toyo Kohan's weighted-average dumping margin for these final results. Final Results of Review The Department determines that, for the period November 19, 2013, through April 30, 2015, the weighted-average dumping margin for Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. is zero. Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\7\ Because Toyo Kohan's weighted-average dumping margin is zero for these final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212 and the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \8\ The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ In these final results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). \8\ Id. at 8102. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Toyo Kohan for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. The all-others rate is 45.42 percent.\9\ We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan: Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 30816, 30817 (May 29, 2014) (Order). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act): (1) No cash deposit will be required for Toyo Kohan since the rate for Toyo Kohan in the final results of this administrative review is zero; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 45.42 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\10\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant [[Page 91118]] entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: December 9, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments Comment 1: Whether Certain of Toyo Kohan's Home Market Transactions Were Made Outside the Ordinary Course of Trade and Should Be Excluded From Analysis Comment 2: U.S. Date of Sale Comment 3: Whether the Costs for a Certain Control Number Should Be Disregarded VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-30306 Filed 12-15-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![91116 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices
a top coat; 5 and without an adhesive were exported by Jaan Huey and and the terms of an APO is a
backing. Certain lightweight thermal Hanhong. The Department intends to sanctionable violation.
paper is typically (but not exclusively) issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 We are issuing and publishing these
used in point-of-sale applications such days after the date of publication of results in accordance with sections
as ATM receipts, credit card receipts, these final results of review. 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
gas pump receipts, and retail store Dated: December 12, 2016.
Cash Deposit Requirements
receipts. The merchandise subject to
The following cash deposit Paul Piquado,
this review may be classified in the
requirements will be effective upon Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
publication of the final results of this Compliance.
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under
administrative review for all shipments [FR Doc. 2016–30308 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am]
subheadings 3703.10.60, 4811.59.20,
4811.90.8040, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.20, of the subject merchandise entered, or BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
4823.40.00, 4811.90.8030, 4811.90.8050, withdrawn from warehouse, for
4811.90.9030, and 4811.90.9050.6 7 consumption on or after the publication
Although HTSUS subheadings are date, as provided for by section DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
provided for convenience and customs 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for Jaan Huey and Hanhong, International Trade Administration
purposes, the written description of the
scope of these orders is dispositive. as part of the PRC-wide entity, will be [A–588–869]
the PRC-wide rate of 115.29 percent; (2)
Final Results of Review for previously investigated or reviewed Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-
The Department continues to find that PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not Rolled Steel Products From Japan:
Jaan Huey and Hanhong are not eligible under review in this segment of the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
for a separate rate and are part of the proceeding but who have separate rates, Administrative Review; 2013–2015
PRC-wide entity for the period the cash deposit rate will continue to be
November 1, 2014, through October 31, the exporter-specific rate published for AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
2015. Because no party requested a the most recent period; (3) for all PRC International Trade Administration,
review of the PRC-wide entity, and the exporters of subject merchandise that Department of Commerce.
Department no longer considers the have not been found to be entitled to a SUMMARY: On June 17, 2016, the
PRC-wide entity as an exporter separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Department of Commerce (the
conditionally subject to administrative be the PRC-wide rate of 115.29 percent; Department) published the preliminary
reviews, we did not conduct a review of and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of results of the administrative review of
the PRC-wide entity and the PRC-wide subject merchandise which have not the antidumping duty order on
entity’s rate is not subject to change in received their own rate, the cash deposit diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat
this administrative review.8 rate will be the rate applicable to the rolled steel products from Japan.1 The
PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non- review covers one company, Toyo
Assessment Rates
PRC exporter. These deposit Kohan Co., Ltd. (Toyo Kohan). The
We will instruct U.S. Customs and requirements, when imposed, shall period of review (POR) is November 19,
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to apply an remain in effect until further notice. 2013 through April 30, 2015. As a result
ad valorem assessment rate of 115.29 of our analysis of the comments and
percent (the rate applicable to the PRC- Notification to Importers information received, these final results
wide entity) to all entries of subject This notice also serves as a final do not differ from the Preliminary
merchandise during the POR which reminder to importers of their Results.
responsibility under 19 CFR DATES: Effective December 16, 2016.
5 A top coat, when applied, is typically made of
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
polyvinyl acetone, polyvinyl alcohol, and/or like
materials and is intended to provide environmental
regarding the reimbursement of Dena Crossland or Brian Davis, AD/CVD
protection, an improved surface for press printing, antidumping duties prior to liquidation Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
and/or wear protection for the thermal print head. of the relevant entries during this Compliance, International Trade
6 HTSUS subheading 4811.90.8000 was a
period. Failure to comply with this Administration, U.S. Department of
classification used for LWTP until January 1, 2007.
Effective that date, subheading 4811.90.8000 was
requirement could result in the Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
replaced with 4811.90.8020 (for gift wrap, a non- Secretary’s presumption that NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
subject product) and 4811.90.8040 (for ‘‘other’’ reimbursement of antidumping duties (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482–7924,
including LWTP). HTSUS subheading 4811.90.9000 occurred and the subsequent assessment
was a classification for LWTP until July 1, 2005. respectively.
Effective that date, subheading 4811.90.9000 was
of double antidumping duties.
replaced with 4811.90.9010 (for tissue paper, a non-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notification to Interested Parties
subject product) and 4811.90.9090 (for ‘‘other,’’ Background
including LWTP). This notice also serves as a reminder
7 As of January 1, 2009, the International Trade
to parties subject to administrative On June 17, 2016, the Department
Commission deleted HTSUS subheadings protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their published the Preliminary Results. In
4811.90.8040 and 4811.90.9090 and added HTSUS
subheadings 4811.90.8030, 4811.90.8050, responsibility concerning the return or accordance with 19 CFR
4811.90.9030, and 4811.90.9050 to the Harmonized destruction of proprietary information 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to
Tariff Schedule of the United States (2009). See disclosed under APO in accordance comment on our Preliminary Results.2
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which We received a case brief from Thomas
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
(2009), available at <ww.usitc.gov>. These HTSUS
subheadings were added to the scope of the order continues to govern business Steel Strip Corporation (Petitioner) on
in LWTP’s LTFV investigation. proprietary information in this segment
8 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of the proceeding. Timely written 1 See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent notification of the return/destruction of Rolled Steel Products from Japan: Preliminary
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
APO materials, or conversion to judicial Review; 2013–2015, 81 FR 39627 (June 17, 2016)
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 protective order, is hereby requested. (Preliminary Results).
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). Failure to comply with the regulations 2 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 39628.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Dec 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91358/page/1.svg)
![91118 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices
entries during the POR. Failure to circumstances review of the On September 29, 2016, the
comply with this requirement could antidumping duty order on stainless petitioners 5 alleged that, since their
result in the Department’s presumption steel bar (SSB) from India to determine conditional revocation from the Order,
that reimbursement of antidumping whether to reinstate the order with there is evidence that Viraj and Venus
duties occurred and the subsequent respect to Viraj Profı̀les Ltd. (Viraj) and have both resumed sales to the United
assessment of doubled antidumping Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its States at prices below normal value
duties. affiliates Hindustan Inox, Precision (NV). The petitioners note that Viraj and
Metals and Sieves Manufacturers (India) Venus agreed in writing to
Administrative Protective Order
Pvt. Ltd. (collectively, Venus). reinstatement into the AD order if either
This notice also serves as a reminder DATES: Effective December 16, 2016. company were found to have resumed
to parties subject to administrative dumping, and alleges that, because Viraj
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
protective order (APO) of their and Venus violated this agreement, the
Thomas Schauer, Enforcement and
responsibility concerning the return or Department should initiate a changed
Compliance, International Trade
destruction of proprietary information circumstances review (CCR) to
Administration, U.S. Department of
disclosed under APO in accordance determine whether to reinstate Viraj and
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Venus into the Order.6
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
continues to govern business In November 2016, Viraj and Venus
(202) 482–0410.
proprietary information in this segment objected to the petitioners’ request for a
of the proceeding. Timely written SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
CCR.7 On November 28, 2016, the
notification of the return/destruction of Background petitioners submitted a rebuttal to
APO materials, or conversion to judicial Venus’ objection to the request for a
protective order, is hereby requested. On February 21, 1995, the Department
published the antidumping duty (AD) CCR.8 Also in November 2016, the
Failure to comply with the regulations Department extended the time period
and the terms of an APO is a order on SSB from India.1 On
September 14, 2004, the Department for determining whether to initiate the
sanctionable violation. CCR by 45 days to December 28, 2016.9
We are issuing and publishing this conditionally revoked the Order with
respect to merchandise produced and In accordance with section 751(b) of
notice in accordance with sections the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 exported by Viraj Alloys, Ltd., Viraj
Forgings, Ltd., and Viraj Impoexpo, Ltd. Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(b), and as
CFR 351.213(h). discussed in further detail below, the
(collectively, Viraj, and now known as
Dated: December 9, 2016. Viraj Profiles Limited 2), based on a Department finds the information
Paul Piquado, finding of three years of no dumping.3 submitted by the petitioners sufficient
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and On September 13, 2011, the Department to warrant initiation of a CCR of the AD
Compliance. conditionally revoked the Order with order on SSB from India with respect to
respect to merchandise produced and Viraj and Venus. The period of review
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in (POR) is July 1, 2015, through June 30,
the Final Issues and Decision exported by Venus, based on a finding
of three years of no dumping.4 2016.
Memorandum In this CCR, we intend to determine
I. Summary 1 See Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless Steel whether Viraj or Venus sold SSB from
II. List of Issues Bar from Brazil, India, and Japan, 60 FR 9661 India at less than NV subsequent to their
III. Background (February 21, 1995) (Order). revocations from the Order. If we make
IV. Scope of the Order 2 In July 2006, Viraj Forgings Ltd. merged with
an affirmative preliminarily finding, we
V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments Viraj Alloys Ltd.; in April 2007, Viraj Alloys and
Comment 1: Whether Certain of Toyo Viraj Impoexpo Ltd. merged into Viraj Profiles Ltd.
will direct U.S. Customs and Border
Kohan’s Home Market Transactions See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar Protection to suspend liquidation of all
Were Made Outside the Ordinary Course From India—Petitioners’ Request for Changed entries of SSB manufactured in India
of Trade and Should Be Excluded From Circumstances Reviews,’’ dated September 29, 2016 and exported by the company(ies) for
(CCR Request) at Exhibit GEN–1.
Analysis 3 See Stainless Steel Bar From India; Final
which we made an affirmative finding.
Comment 2: U.S. Date of Sale
Results, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Scope of the Order
Comment 3: Whether the Costs for a Administrative Review in Part, and Determination
Certain Control Number Should Be To Revoke in Part, 69 FR 55409 (September 14, The merchandise subject to the order
Disregarded 2004) (Viraj Revocation). The regulatory provision is stainless steel bar. Stainless steel bar
VI. Recommendation governing partial revocation at the time of Viraj’s
[FR Doc. 2016–30306 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am] (and Venus’s) revocation was 19 CFR 353.25 (1997). 5 Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible
The relevant language remained substantively
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P unchanged when 19 CFR 353.25 was superseded by Industries LLC, Electralloy, a Division of G.O.
19 CFR 351.222 in 1997. See Antidumping Duties; Carlson, Inc., North American Stainless,
Countervailing Duties: Notice of Proposed Outokumpu Stainless Bar, LLC, Universal Stainless
Rulemaking and Request for Public Comments, 61 & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna Slater
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners)
FR 7308 (February 27, 1996) (1996 Notice of
6 See CCR Request.
Proposed Rulemaking); see also Antidumping
International Trade Administration Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 7 See Letter from Viraj, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from
27296, 27325–26, 27399–402 (May 19, 1997) India,’’ dated November 14, 2016 (Viraj Rebuttal)
[A–533–810]
(Preamble). The portion of 19 CFR 351.222 related and Letter from Venus, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bars
to partial revocations of orders as to specific (‘‘SSB’’) from India—Response to Request for
Stainless Steel Bar From India: companies has been revoked for all reviews Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated November
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Initiation of Antidumping Duty initiated on or after June 20, 2012. See Modification 4, 2016 (Venus Rebuttal).
Changed Circumstances Review to Regulation Concerning the Revocation of 8 See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Stainless Bar
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders: from India—Petitioners’ Comments Concerning
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Final Rule, 77 FR 29875 (May 21, 2012) (Revocation Venus’ Rebuttal Comments to Petitioners’ Changed
International Trade Administration, Final Rule). Circumstances Review Request,’’ dated November
4 See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Final Results 29, 2016.
Department of Commerce.
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline to
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce and Revocation of the Order, in Part, 76 FR 56401 Initiate Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated
(the Department) is initiating a changed (September 13, 2011) (Venus Revocation). November 10, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Dec 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91358/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 09:07:11
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 09:07:11
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective December 16, 2016. | |
| Contact | Dena Crossland or Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3362 or (202) 482-7924, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 91116 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR