81 FR 91120 - Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 242 (December 16, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 242 (December 16, 2016)
| Page Range | 91120-91122 | |
| FR Document | 2016-30324 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 242 (Friday, December 16, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 91120-91122] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-30324] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-475-818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review of certain pasta (pasta) from Italy. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, these final results differ from the Preliminary Results with respect to Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) and Liguori Pastificio Dal 1820 (Liguori). For the final weighted-average dumping margins, see the ``Final Results of Review'' section below. DATES: Effective December 16, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang (Liguori) or George McMahon (Indalco), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results.\1\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. On September 7, 2016, Liguori submitted a request for a hearing, which was withdrawn on October 6, 2016.\2\ On August 31, 2016, the Department revised the briefing schedule.\3\ On September 19, 2016, Petitioners,\4\ Indalco, and Liguori submitted their case briefs. On September 26, 2016, Petitioners, Indalco, and Liguori submitted their rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 53404 (August 12, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Liguori's letter titled, ``Hearing Request of Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A.,'' dated September 7, 2016. See also Liguori's letter titled, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Hearing Request of Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A.,'' dated October 6, 2016. \3\ See the Department's Memorandum to All Interested Parties titled, ``Postponement of Briefing Schedule,'' dated August 31, 2016. \4\ Petitioners consist of New World Pasta Company, American Italian Pasta Company and Dakota Growers Pasta Company. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from Italy; 2014-2015'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and incorporated herein by reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have recalculated Indalco and Liguori's weighted-average dumping margins.\6\ As a result of the [[Page 91121]] recalculation of the rates for Indalco and Liguori, the weighted- average dumping margin for the non-selected companies has changed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from Joy Zhang, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation Memorandum--Liguori,'' dated concurrently with this notice, and Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from George McMahon, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation Memorandum--Indalco,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, the Department calculated a weighted- average dumping margin of 1.20 percent for Indalco and 10.79 percent for Liguori for the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the Department assigned the weighted-average of these two calculated weighted-average dumping margins, 4.00 percent, to the 19 non-selected companies in these final results, as referenced below.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The rate applied to the non-selected companies is a weighted-average percentage margin calculated based on the publicly- ranged U.S. volumes of the two reviewed companies with an affirmative dumping margin, for the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. See Memorandum to the File titled, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,'' dated concurrently with this notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer and/or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco).......... 1.20 Liguori Pastificio Dal 1820 (Liguori)................... 10.79 Agritalia S.r.L. (Agritalia)............................ 4.00 Atar S.r.L. (Atar)...................................... 4.00 Corticella Molini e Pastifici S.p.A. (Corticella)....... 4.00 Delverde Industrie Alimentari S.p.A. (Delverde)......... 4.00 Domenico Paone fu Erasmo S.p.A. (Domenico).............. 4.00 F. Divella S.p.A. (F. Divella).......................... 4.00 La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gragnano S.a.s. di Antonio 4.00 Moccia (La Fabbrica)................................... Molino e Pastificio Tomasello S.r.L. (Tomasello)........ 4.00 P.A.P SNC DI Pazienza G.B. & C. (P.A.P)................. 4.00 Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Pasta Zara).......................... 4.00 Pastificio Carmine Russo S.p.A. (Carmine)............... 4.00 Pastificio DiMartino Gaetano & F. Ili S.r.L. (DiMartino) 4.00 Pastificio Fabianelli S.p.A. (Fabianelli)............... 4.00 Pastificio Felicetti S.r.L. (Felicetti)................. 4.00 Pastificio Labor S.r.L. (Labor)......................... 4.00 Pastificio Riscossa F. Ili Mastromauro S.p.A. (AKA 4.00 Pastificio Riscossa F. Ili. Mastromauro S.r.L.) (Riscossa)............................................. Poiatti S.p.A. (Poiatti)................................ 4.00 Premiato Pastificio Afreltra S.r.L. (Premiato).......... 4.00 Rustichella d'Abruzzo S.p.A. (Rustichella).............. 4.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\8\ For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), the Department will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ In these final results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all- others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by the section 129 determination. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to [[Page 91122]] liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: December 12, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. List of Comments V. Analysis of Comments Indalco Comment 1: General and Administrative (G&A) Expense Ratio Comment 2: Interest Expense Ratio Comment 3: Cost of Goods Sold for G&A and Interest Expense Ratios Comment 4: Adjustment to the Cost of Manufacturing Comment 5: Correct Assessment Rate Comment 6: Level of Trade Liguori Comment 7: Depreciation of Idled Asset Comment 8: Semolina Costs Comment 9: Home Market Inland Freight Comment 10: Shape Classification VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-30324 Filed 12-15-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![91120 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices
order from which they were revoked if DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE September 19, 2016, Petitioners,4
the Department finds that the company Indalco, and Liguori submitted their
has resumed dumping.24 For these International Trade Administration case briefs. On September 26, 2016,
reasons, conducting a CCR pursuant to Petitioners, Indalco, and Liguori
section 751(b) of the Act to determine [A–475–818] submitted their rebuttal briefs.
whether to reinstate Viraj or Venus into Scope of the Order
the Order is consistent with the statute Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Imports covered by the order are
and with the certification that the
Review; 2014–2015 shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta.
respondents signed as a precondition to The merchandise subject to review is
their conditional revocation.25 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, currently classifiable under items
Period of Changed Circumstances International Trade Administration, 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Review Department of Commerce. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
SUMMARY: On August 12, 2016, the United States (HTSUS). Although the
The Department intends to request Department of Commerce (the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
data from Viraj and Venus for the July Department) published the preliminary convenience and customs purposes, the
1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, period results of the antidumping duty written description of the merchandise
to determine whether it should reinstate administrative review of certain pasta subject to the order is dispositive.5
the Order with respect to these (pasta) from Italy. The period of review Analysis of Comments Received
companies because they resumed (POR) is July 1, 2014, through June 30,
dumping. All issues raised in the case and
2015. As a result of our analysis of the rebuttal briefs by parties to this
Public Comment comments and information received, administrative review are addressed in
these final results differ from the the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
The Department intends to publish in Preliminary Results with respect to A list of the issues that parties raised
the Federal Register a notice of Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. and to which we responded is attached
preliminary results of CCR in (Indalco) and Liguori Pastificio Dal 1820 to this notice as an Appendix. The
accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4) (Liguori). For the final weighted-average Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
and 351.221(c)(3)(i), which will set forth dumping margins, see the ‘‘Final Results public document and is on-file
the Department’s preliminary factual of Review’’ section below. electronically via Enforcement and
and legal conclusions. Pursuant to 19 DATES: Effective December 16, 2016. Compliance’s Antidumping and
CFR 351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Countervailing Duty Centralized
will have an opportunity to comment on Zhang (Liguori) or George McMahon Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
the preliminary results. Unless (Indalco), AD/CVD Operations, Office ACCESS is available to registered users
otherwise extended, the Department III, Enforcement and Compliance, at https://access.trade.gov and in the
intends to issue its final results of International Trade Administration, Central Records Unit (CRU), room
review in accordance with the time U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th B8024 of the main Department of
limits set forth in 19 CFR 351.216(e). Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Commerce building. In addition, a
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) complete version of the Issues and
This notice is published in Decision Memorandum can be accessed
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 482–1168 or (202) 482–1167,
respectively. directly on the Internet at http://
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
351.221(b) of the Department’s SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The signed Issues and Decision
regulations. Memorandum and the electronic
Background
Dated: December 12, 2016. versions of the Issues and Decision
Christian Marsh, On August 12, 2016, the Department Memorandum are identical in content.
of Commerce (the Department)
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping Changes Since the Preliminary Results
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
published the Preliminary Results.1 In
accordance with 19 CFR Based on a review of the record and
[FR Doc. 2016–30323 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am] comments received from interested
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P comment on our Preliminary Results. parties regarding our Preliminary
On September 7, 2016, Liguori Results, we have recalculated Indalco
24 See Revocation Final Rule, 77 FR at 29882. submitted a request for a hearing, which and Liguori’s weighted-average
25 See, e.g., Sahaviriya, 649 F.3d at 1380; was withdrawn on October 6, 2016.2 On dumping margins.6 As a result of the
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed August 31, 2016, the Department
Circumstances Review: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon 4 Petitioners consist of New World Pasta
Steel Flat Products from Thailand, 73 FR 18766,
revised the briefing schedule.3 On
Company, American Italian Pasta Company and
18769 (April 7, 2008); see also Viraj Revocation, 69 Dakota Growers Pasta Company.
1 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary
FR at 55411 (‘‘Viraj provided each of the 5 For a full description of the scope of the order,
certifications required under 19 CFR 351.222(e) Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
. . . {including} an agreement to immediate Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 53404 (August 12, 2016) Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
reinstatement of the order if the Department (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Italy; 2014–2015’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
concludes that the company, subsequent to the 2 See Liguori’s letter titled, ‘‘Hearing Request of Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
revocation, sold subject merchandise at less than
Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A.,’’ dated Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
NV.’’); see also Venus Revocation, 76 at 56402–3 September 7, 2016. See also Liguori’s letter titled, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
(‘‘the company has agreed to immediate ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Hearing Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice
reinstatement of the order if we find that it has Request of Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A.,’’ dated (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and
resumed making sales at less than fair value’’). See October 6, 2016. incorporated herein by reference.
also Changed Circumstances Review Initiation 3 See the Department’s Memorandum to All 6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also
Checklist at Exhibit 6 for copies of the respondents’ Interested Parties titled, ‘‘Postponement of Briefing Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B.
agreements. Schedule,’’ dated August 31, 2016. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from Joy
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Dec 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91362/page/1.svg)
![91122 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices
liquidation of the relevant entries DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Respondent Selection
during the POR. Failure to comply with In the event the Department limits the
this requirement could result in the International Trade Administration number of respondents for individual
Department’s presumption that examination for administrative reviews
Initiation of Antidumping and
reimbursement of antidumping and/or initiated pursuant to requests made for
Countervailing Duty Administrative
countervailing duties occurred and the the orders identified below, the
Reviews
subsequent assessment of doubled Department intends to select
antidumping duties. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, respondents based on U.S. Customs and
International Trade Administration, Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
Administrative Protective Order
Department of Commerce. imports during the period of review. We
This notice also serves as a reminder intend to place the CBP data on the
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce record within five days of publication of
to parties subject to administrative (‘‘the Department’’) has received
protective orders (APO) of their the initiation notice and to make our
requests to conduct administrative decision regarding respondent selection
responsibility concerning the return or reviews of various antidumping and
destruction of proprietary information within 30 days of publication of the
countervailing duty orders and findings initiation Federal Register notice.
disclosed under APO in accordance with October anniversary dates. In Comments regarding the CBP data and
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which accordance with the Department’s respondent selection should be
continues to govern business regulations, we are initiating those submitted seven days after the
proprietary information in this segment administrative reviews. placement of the CBP data on the record
of the proceeding. Timely written of this review. Parties wishing to submit
DATES: Effective December 16, 2016.
notification of the return/destruction of rebuttal comments should submit those
APO materials, or conversion to judicial FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
comments five days after the deadline
protective order, is hereby requested. Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
for the initial comments.
Failure to comply with the regulations Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, In the event the Department decides
and the terms of an APO is a Enforcement and Compliance, it is necessary to limit individual
sanctionable violation. International Trade Administration, examination of respondents and
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 conduct respondent selection under
We are issuing and publishing this Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
notice in accordance with sections section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. In general, the Department has found
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
Dated: December 12, 2016. Background
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
Paul Piquado, The Department has received timely entity for purposes of calculating
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and requests, in accordance with 19 CFR antidumping duty rates) require a
Compliance. 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of substantial amount of detailed
various antidumping and countervailing information and analysis, which often
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in require follow-up questions and
duty orders and findings with October
the Final Issues and Decision anniversary dates. analysis. Accordingly, the Department
Memorandum will not conduct collapsing analyses at
All deadlines for the submission of
I. Summary various types of information, the respondent selection phase of this
II. Background certifications, or comments or actions by review and will not collapse companies
III. Scope of the Order the Department discussed below refer to at the respondent selection phase unless
IV. List of Comments the number of calendar days from the there has been a determination to
V. Analysis of Comments applicable starting time. collapse certain companies in a
Indalco previous segment of this antidumping
Comment 1: General and Administrative Notice of No Sales proceeding (i.e., investigation,
(G&A) Expense Ratio administrative review, new shipper
If a producer or exporter named in
Comment 2: Interest Expense Ratio review or changed circumstances
this notice of initiation had no exports,
Comment 3: Cost of Goods Sold for G&A review). For any company subject to this
sales, or entries during the period of
and Interest Expense Ratios review, if the Department determined,
review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the
Comment 4: Adjustment to the Cost of or continued to treat, that company as
Department within 30 days of
Manufacturing collapsed with others, the Department
publication of this notice in the Federal
Comment 5: Correct Assessment Rate will assume that such companies
Register. All submissions must be filed
Comment 6: Level of Trade continue to operate in the same manner
electronically at http://access.trade.gov
Liguori and will collapse them for respondent
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1
Comment 7: Depreciation of Idled Asset selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Comment 8: Semolina Costs
Such submissions are subject to
Department will not collapse companies
Comment 9: Home Market Inland Freight verification in accordance with section
for purposes of respondent selection.
Comment 10: Shape Classification 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Parties are requested to (a) identify
VI. Recommendation amended (‘‘the Act’’). Further, in
which companies subject to review
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i),
[FR Doc. 2016–30324 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am] previously were collapsed, and (b)
a copy must be served on every party on
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P provide a citation to the proceeding in
the Department’s service list.
which they were collapsed. Further, if
1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
companies are requested to complete
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
the Quantity and Value (‘‘Q&V’’)
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR Questionnaire for purposes of
39263 (July 6, 2011). respondent selection, in general each
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Dec 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_91362/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 09:07:22
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 09:07:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective December 16, 2016. | |
| Contact | Joy Zhang (Liguori) or George McMahon (Indalco), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 91120 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR