81 FR 95475 - Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile Organic Compounds Definition
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 249 (December 28, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 249 (December 28, 2016)
| Page Range | 95475-95477 | |
| FR Document | 2016-31227 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 28, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 95475-95477] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-31227] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R05-OAR-2016-0502; FRL-9955-89-Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile Organic Compounds Definition AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state submission as a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision amends the Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) by updating the definition of volatile organic material (VOM), otherwise known as volatile organic compounds (VOC), to exclude 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP). This revision is in response to an EPA rulemaking in 2014 which exempted this compound from the Federal definition of VOC on the basis that the compound makes a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective February 27, 2017, unless EPA receives adverse comments by January 27, 2017. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2016-0502 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Becker, Life Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR- 18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3901, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. What is the background for this action? II. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP Revision? III. What action is EPA taking? IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is the background for this action? The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to the Illinois SIP to EPA for approval on August 9, 2016. The SIP revision excludes the chemical compound 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) from the definition of VOM or VOC at 35 IAC Part 211, Subpart B, Section 211.7150(a). The Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) held a public hearing on the proposed SIP revision on January 8, 2015. There were no public comments received at the public hearing. IPCB received one comment from the American Coatings Association in a letter dated December 16, 2014, supporting the exemption of AMP from [[Page 95476]] the Illinois regulated VOCs. IPCB adopted the amendment to 35 IAC 211.7150(a) on March 5, 2015. IPCB also adopted minor administrative changes such as alphabetizing compound names, adding a subpart heading previously omitted, and replacing the word ``above'' with ``of this Section'' in 35 IAC 211.7150(d) for ease of cross-referencing within a section of the regulations. II. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP Revision? In 2012, EPA received a petition requesting that AMP be exempted from VOC control based on its low reactivity to ethane. On March 27, 2014 (79 FR 17037), EPA responded to the petition by amending 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1) to exclude this chemical compound from the definition of VOC for purposes of preparing SIPs to attain the national ambient air quality standard for ozone under title I of the CAA (78 FR 9823). Based on the mass maximum incremental reactivity value for the compound being equal to or less than that of ethane, EPA concluded that this compound makes negligible contributions to tropospheric ozone formation. (79 FR 17037). Additionally, EPA considered risks not related to tropospheric ozone associated with currently allowed uses of the chemical to be acceptable. EPA's action became effective on June 25, 2014. IEPA's SIP revision is consistent with EPA's action amending the definition of VOC at 40 CFR 51.100(s). III. What action is EPA taking? EPA is approving into the Illinois SIP revisions to 35 IAC 211 contained in the August 9, 2016, submittal. We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse written comments are filed. This rule will be effective February 27, 2017 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written comments by January 27, 2017. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. If we do not receive any comments, this action will be effective February 27, 2017. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Illinois Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov, and/or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and/or at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 27, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and [[Page 95477]] shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: November 18, 2016. Robert A. Kaplan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 0 2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(209) to read as follows: Sec. 52.720 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (209) On August 9, 2016, the state submitted a proposed revision to the Illinois SIP updating the definition of Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) to exclude the chemical compound 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), along with minor administrative revisions. (i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Station Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), effective March 24, 2015. [FR Doc. 2016-31227 Filed 12-27-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 95475
Indian country, the rule does not have Subpart F—California submitting comments. Once submitted,
tribal implications and will not impose comments cannot be edited or removed
substantial direct costs on tribal ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by from Regulations.gov. For either manner
governments or preempt tribal law as adding paragraph (c)(483) to read as of submission, EPA may publish any
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 follows: comment received to its public docket.
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Do not submit electronically any
§ 52.220 Identification of plan—in part.
information you consider to be
The Congressional Review Act, 5 * * * * * Confidential Business Information (CBI)
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small (c) * * * or other information whose disclosure is
Business Regulatory Enforcement (483) A new regulation was submitted restricted by statute. Multimedia
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides on June 9, 2016 by the Governor’s submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
that before a rule may take effect, the Designee. accompanied by a written comment.
agency promulgating the rule must (i) Incorporation by Reference. The written comment is considered the
submit a rule report, which includes a (A) Great Basin Unified Air Pollution
official comment and should include
copy of the rule, to each House of the Control District.
discussion of all points you wish to
Congress and to the Comptroller General (1) Rule 433, ‘‘Control of Particulate
make. EPA will generally not consider
of the United States. The EPA will Emissions at Owens Lake,’’ adopted on
comments or comment contents located
submit a report containing this action April 13, 2016.
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
and other required information to the [FR Doc. 2016–31225 Filed 12–27–16; 8:45 am]
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of BILLING CODE 6560–50–P system). For additional submission
Representatives, and the Comptroller methods, please contact the person
General of the United States prior to identified in the FOR FURTHER
publication of the rule in the Federal ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
Register. A major rule cannot take effect AGENCY full EPA public comment policy,
until 60 days after it is published in the information about CBI or multimedia
Federal Register. This action is not a 40 CFR Part 52
submissions, and general guidance on
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. [EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0502; FRL–9955–89– making effective comments, please visit
804(2). Region 5] http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean commenting-epa-dockets.
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Organic Compounds Definition
this action must be filed in the United Michelle Becker, Life Scientist,
States Court of Appeals for the AGENCY: Environmental Protection Attainment Planning and Maintenance
appropriate circuit by February 27, Agency (EPA). Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
2017. Filing a petition for ACTION: Direct final rule. Environmental Protection Agency,
reconsideration by the Administrator of Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
this final rule does not affect the finality SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–3901,
of this action for the purposes of judicial (CAA), the Environmental Protection becker.michelle@epa.gov.
review nor does it extend the time Agency (EPA) is approving a state SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
within which a petition for judicial submission as a revision to the Illinois Throughout this document whenever
review may be filed, and shall not State Implementation Plan (SIP). The ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
postpone the effectiveness of such rule revision amends the Illinois EPA. This supplementary information
or action. This action may not be Administrative Code (IAC) by updating section is arranged as follows:
challenged later in proceedings to the definition of volatile organic I. What is the background for this action?
enforce its requirements (see section material (VOM), otherwise known as II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP
307(b)(2)). volatile organic compounds (VOC), to Revision?
exclude 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol III. What action is EPA taking?
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 (AMP). This revision is in response to IV. Incorporation by Reference
an EPA rulemaking in 2014 which V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Environmental protection, Air exempted this compound from the
pollution control, Incorporation by I. What is the background for this
Federal definition of VOC on the basis action?
reference, Intergovernmental relations, that the compound makes a negligible
Particulate matter, Reporting and contribution to tropospheric ozone The Illinois Environmental Protection
recordkeeping requirements. formation. Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to
the Illinois SIP to EPA for approval on
Dated: November 10, 2016. DATES: This direct final rule will be August 9, 2016. The SIP revision
Alexis Strauss, effective February 27, 2017, unless EPA excludes the chemical compound 2-
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. receives adverse comments by January amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) from
27, 2017. If adverse comments are the definition of VOM or VOC at 35 IAC
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code received, EPA will publish a timely Part 211, Subpart B, Section
of Federal Regulations is amended as withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 211.7150(a).
follows: Federal Register informing the public The Illinois Pollution Control Board
that the rule will not take effect. (IPCB) held a public hearing on the
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, proposed SIP revision on January 8,
PROMULGATION OF
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 2015. There were no public comments
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
OAR–2016–0502 at http:// received at the public hearing. IPCB
www.regulations.gov or via email to received one comment from the
■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For American Coatings Association in a
continues to read as follows: comments submitted at Regulations.gov, letter dated December 16, 2014,
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. follow the online instructions for supporting the exemption of AMP from
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:15 Dec 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM 28DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_95724/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 95477
shall not postpone the effectiveness of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
such rule or action. Parties with AGENCY Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
objections to this direct final rule are documents in the docket are listed in
encouraged to file a comment in 40 CFR Part 52 the index, some information may be
response to the parallel notice of [EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0513; FRL–9956–45– publicly available only at the hard copy
proposed rulemaking for this action Region 6] location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
published in the proposed rules section some may not be publicly available at
of today’s Federal Register, rather than Approval and Promulgation of either location (e.g., CBI).
file an immediate petition for judicial Implementation Plans; Louisiana; State FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
review of this direct final rule, so that Boards Tracie Donaldson, 214–665–6633,
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. To inspect
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
and address the comment in the the hard copy materials, please schedule
Agency (EPA).
proposed rulemaking. This action may an appointment with Tracie Donaldson
ACTION: Direct final rule.
not be challenged later in proceedings to or Mr. Bill Deese at 214–665–7253.
enforce its requirements. (See section SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
307(b)(2).) Air Act (CAA or Act), the Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
is approving revisions to the Louisiana
Environmental protection, Air I. Background
State Implementation Plan (SIP) that
pollution control, Incorporation by address requirements in CAA Section A. CAA and Section 128: State Boards
reference, Intergovernmental relations, 128 regarding State Board composition and Heads of Executive Agency,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping and Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Conflicts of Interest
requirements, Volatile organic requirements. Section 128 of the CAA requires SIPs
compounds. DATES: This rule is effective on February to comply with the requirements
Dated: November 18, 2016. 27, 2017 without further notice, unless regarding State Boards. Section
Robert A. Kaplan, the EPA receives relevant adverse 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) of the CAA also
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. comment by January 27, 2017. If the references these requirements. Section
EPA receives such comment, the EPA 128(a) of the CAA requires SIPs to
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows: will publish a timely withdrawal in the contain provisions that: (1) Any board
Federal Register informing the public or body which approves permits or
PART 52—APPROVAL AND that this rule will not take effect.
PROMULGATION OF enforcement orders under the CAA have
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, at least a majority of its members
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– represent the public interest and not
OAR–2014–0513, at http:// derive any significant portion of their
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
www.regulations.gov or via email to income from persons subject to permits
continues to read as follows:
donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. Follow the or enforcement orders under the CAA;
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. online instructions for submitting and (2) any potential conflict of interest
■ 2. Section 52.720 is amended by comments. Once submitted, comments by members of such board or body or
adding paragraph (c)(209) to read as cannot be edited or removed from the head of an executive agency with
follows: Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish similar powers be adequately disclosed.
any comment received to its public The requirements of CAA section
§ 52.720 Identification of plan. docket. Do not submit electronically any 128(a)(1) are not applicable to Louisiana
* * * * * information you consider to be because it does not have any board or
(c) * * * Confidential Business Information (CBI) body which approves air quality permits
(209) On August 9, 2016, the state or other information whose disclosure is or enforcement orders. The
submitted a proposed revision to the restricted by statute. Multimedia requirements of CAA section 128(a)(2),
Illinois SIP updating the definition of submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be however, are applicable to Louisiana
Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or accompanied by a written comment. because LDEQ’s cabinet level Secretary
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) to The written comment is considered the (i.e., the head of an executive agency)
exclude the chemical compound 2- official comment and should include makes the referenced decisions. Under
amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), discussion of all points you wish to Louisiana Revised Statutes at Title 30;
along with minor administrative make. The EPA will generally not Subtitle 2. Environmental Quality;
revisions. consider comments or comment Chapter 2; Department of Environmental
contents located outside of the primary Quality, and Chapter 3; Louisiana Air
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or Control Law, the Secretary of the
Administrative Code, Title 35: other file sharing system). For Louisiana Department of Environmental
Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: additional submission methods, please Quality (LDEQ), has the power and duty
Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution contact Tracie Donaldson, 214–665– to, among other things, grant or deny air
Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions 6633, Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. For quality related permits.
Standards and Limitations for Station the full EPA public comment policy,
Sources, Part 211: Definitions and information about CBI or multimedia B. Louisiana’s Submittal
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
General Provisions, Subpart B: submissions, and general guidance on On April 30, 1997 Louisiana
Definitions, Section 211.7150 Volatile making effective comments, please visit submitted a SIP revision that contains
Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ revisions to the Louisiana Revised
Organic Compounds (VOC), effective commenting-epa-dockets. Statutes for inclusion into the SIP. The
March 24, 2015. Docket: The index to the docket for revisions that are necessary for
[FR Doc. 2016–31227 Filed 12–27–16; 8:45 am] this action is available electronically at inclusion into the State’s SIP address
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P www.regulations.gov and in hard copy the requirements of CAA section 128 in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:15 Dec 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM 28DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_95724/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-28 02:17:04
Document Modified: 2016-12-28 02:17:04
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective February 27, 2017, unless EPA receives adverse comments by January 27, 2017. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Michelle Becker, Life Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR- 18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3901, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 95475 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR