81 FR 95677 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 123D and the Listed Company Manual
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 249 (December 28, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 249 (December 28, 2016)
| Page Range | 95677-95679 | |
| FR Document | 2016-31299 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 28, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 95677-95679] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-31299] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-79637; File No. SR-NYSE-2016-86] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 123D and the Listed Company Manual December 21, 2016. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that on December 13, 2016, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The [[Page 95678]] Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123D and the Listed Company Manual to eliminate the requirement for Floor Official approval for halts in trading. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123D and the Listed Company Manual to eliminate the requirement for Floor Official \4\ approval before halting trading in a security. The Exchange believes that in today's trading environment, the requirement for Floor Official approval before halting trading in a security is unnecessary and duplicative of Exchange obligations to assess whether to halt trading in a security under Section 202.06 of the Listed Company Manual. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ ``Floor Official'' encompasses Floor Governor, Floor Official, Executive Floor Governor and Senior Floor Governor, as their responsibilities are currently assigned in connection with trading halts. See also Rules 46 and 46A defining Floor Governor, Floor Official, and Executive Floor Governor. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Rule 123D(d) provides that once trading has commenced, trading may only be halted with the approval of a Floor Governor or two Floor Officials and that an Executive Floor Governor, or in their absence a Senior Floor Governor, should be consulted if it is felt that trading should be halted in a bank or brokerage stock due to a potential misperception regarding the company's financial viability.\5\ The rule further provides that if a listed company notifies the Exchange in advance of publication concerning news which might have a substantial market impact, the Exchange should advise an Executive Floor Governor or Floor Governor, or in their absence, a Floor Official, and specifies procedures for Floor Governors to overrule the Exchange's determination that a security should be halted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Rules 46 and 46A (defining the terms Floor Official, Senior Floor Official, Executive Floor Official, Floor Governor, and Executive Floor Governor). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commensurate with the evolution of the equities markets and trading on the Exchange towards more automated processes, the procedures and situations requiring approvals by Floor Officials have also evolved. For example, the Exchange previously eliminated the ability of a Floor broker to seek an exception to Rule 122 requirements if Floor Official permission is obtained.\6\ In connection with trading halts, the Exchange is responsible for determining whether to halt trading in a security under Section 202.06(B) of the Listed Company Manual. Thus, requiring Floor Official approval before a trading halt can be invoked is an unnecessary pro forma step rather than a substantive requirement. Moreover, obtaining Floor Governor approval adds an extra manual step to the process, which could impede the timely dissemination of a trading halt. Finally, given market fragmentation and highly automated equities trading environment, the Exchange does not believe that Floor Governors, who do not have contact with the listed company, should be in a position to override an Exchange determination to halt trading in a security. Consequently, the Exchange proposes to delete Rule 123D(d) in its entirety as unnecessary and duplicative of existing Exchange obligations specified in the Listed Company Manual. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67345 (July 3, 2012), 77 FR 40683 (July 10, 2012) (SR-NYSE-2012-20) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change amending certain Exchange rules related to floor official duties and responsibilities). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also proposes to make a related change to Section 202.06(B) of the Listed Company Manual to delete two references to Rule 123D that would be rendered obsolete by the proposed deletion of Rule 123D(d). In addition, the Exchange proposes to re-letter the remaining subsections of Rule 123D to account for the deletion of Rule 123D(d). The Exchange proposes to make a related change to eliminate the requirement in Rule 123D(e) that an ``Equipment Changeover'' halt in trading requires the approval of a Floor Governor or two Floor Officials as such approval is no longer necessary. An Equipment Changeover halt is a non-regulatory halt condition that only halts trading on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that if circumstances arise warranting an Equipment Changeover halt, obtaining Floor Official approval before halting trading adds an unnecessary step that is no longer needed in today's automated markets. Because of the procedural changes associated with the proposed rule changes, the Exchange proposes to announce the eliminations via Trader Update and anticipates implementing the changes in the first quarter of 2017. 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule changes are consistent with Section 6(b) \7\ of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\8\ in particular, in that they are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes support the objectives of the Act by amending duties and responsibilities once assigned to Floor Officials to better comport with the Exchange's current regulatory structure and to reflect the changing technology and development of its automated systems. Specifically, eliminating the unnecessary step of obtaining Floor Official approval in connection with trading halts would remove impediments to and perfect a national market system by streamlining and simplifying functionality and complexity in connection with trading halts. The Exchange believes that streamlining the procedures and eliminating unnecessary Floor Official approval requirements would be consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors because investors will not be harmed and in fact would benefit from the removal of unnecessary functionality. The Exchange also believes that eliminating Floor Official approval would benefit investors by adding transparency and clarity to the Exchange's rules. [[Page 95679]] The Exchange believes that the proposed deletion of two references to Rule 123D in Section 202.06B of the Listed Company Manual is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the references are obsolete. The proposed changes would result in the removal of obsolete text from the Listed Company Manual and therefore add greater clarity to the Listed Company Manual regarding halts in trading. The Exchange believes that the proposed re-lettering of the remaining subsections of Rule 123D is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the proposed change would add greater clarity to the Exchange's rule book. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not designed to address any competitive issue but rather would streamline functionality, eliminate an unnecessary step, and streamline forms, thereby reducing confusion and making the Exchange's rules easier to understand and navigate. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\ Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b- 4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\12\ the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NYSE-2016-86 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2016-86. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2016-86 and should be submitted on or before January 18, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-31299 Filed 12-27-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2016 / Notices 95677
because access to the Exchange’s market execution venues to maintain their Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
would continue to be offered on fair and competitive standing in the financial rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
non-discriminatory terms. The markets. submission, all subsequent
Exchange also believes that the proposal amendments, all written statements
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
to maintain the current fee schedule is with respect to the proposed rule
Statement on Comments on the
equitable and not unfairly change that are filed with the
discriminatory because all member Proposed Rule Change Received From Commission, and all written
organizations would continue to have Members, Participants, or Others communications relating to the
the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of No written comments were solicited proposed rule change between the
the fee relief with respect to additional or received with respect to the proposed Commission and any person, other than
trading licenses. rule change. those that may be withheld from the
The Exchange believes that it is public in accordance with the
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
subject to significant competitive forces, provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
as described below in the Exchange’s available for Web site viewing and
statement regarding the burden on Commission Action
printing in the Commission’s Public
competition. The foregoing rule change is effective Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
For the foregoing reasons, the upon filing pursuant to Section Washington, DC 20549, on official
Exchange believes that the proposal is 19(b)(3)(A) 6 of the Act and business days between the hours of
consistent with the Exchange Act. subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 7 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
thereunder, because it establishes a due, filing also will be available for
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
fee, or other charge imposed by the inspection and copying at the principal
Statement on Burden on Competition
Exchange. office of the Exchange. All comments
The Exchange does not believe that At any time within 60 days of the received will be posted without change;
the proposed rule change will impose filing of the proposed rule change, the the Commission does not edit personal
any burden on competition that is not Commission summarily may identifying information from
necessary or appropriate in furtherance temporarily suspend such rule change if submissions. You should submit only
of the purposes of the Act. The it appears to the Commission that such information that you wish to make
proposed rule change will keep trading action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in available publicly. All submissions
license fees the same as they have been the public interest; (ii) for the protection should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
since July 1, 2016. As a result, the of investors; or (iii) otherwise in 2016–88 and should be submitted on or
Exchange does not believe that the furtherance of the purposes of the Act. before January 18, 2017.
proposed rule change will place an If the Commission takes such action, the
unreasonable burden on current For the Commission, by the Division of
Commission shall institute proceedings Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
members because their trading license to determine whether the proposed rule authority.8
fees will remain the same. In addition, should be approved or disapproved. Eduardo A. Aleman,
the Exchange does not believe that the
IV. Solicitation of Comments Assistant Secretary.
proposed rule change will place an
unreasonable burden on potential [FR Doc. 2016–31301 Filed 12–27–16; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to
members because a potential member’s submit written data, views, and BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
fees will be the same as for a current arguments concerning the foregoing,
member and pro-rated for licenses held including whether the proposed rule
for less than a year. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
change is consistent with the Act. COMMISSION
Finally, the Exchange notes that it Comments may be submitted by any of
operates in a highly competitive market the following methods: [Release No. 34–79637; File No. SR–NYSE–
in which market participants can 2016–86]
readily favor competing venues if they Electronic Comments
deem fee levels at a particular venue to • Use the Commission’s Internet Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
be excessive or rebate opportunities comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
available at other venues to be more rules/sro.shtml); or Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
favorable. In such an environment, the • Send an email to rule-comments@ Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule
Exchange must continually adjust its sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 123D and the Listed Company Manual
fees and rebates to remain competitive NYSE–2016–88 on the subject line. December 21, 2016.
with other exchanges and with Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
alternative trading systems that have Paper Comments
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
been exempted from compliance with • Send paper comments in triplicate ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
the statutory standards applicable to to Secretary, Securities and Exchange notice is hereby given that on December
exchanges. Because competitors are free Commission, 100 F Street NE., 13, 2016, New York Stock Exchange
to modify their own fees and credits in Washington, DC 20549–1090. LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
response, and because market All submissions should refer to File with the Securities and Exchange
participants may readily adjust their Number SR–NYSE–2016–88. This file Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
order routing practices, the Exchange number should be included on the proposed rule change as described in
believes that the degree to which fee
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
subject line if email is used. To help the Items I, II, and III below, which Items
changes in this market may impose any Commission process and review your have been prepared by the self-
burden on competition is extremely comments more efficiently, please use regulatory organization. The
limited. As a result of all of these only one method. The Commission will
considerations, the Exchange does not post all comments on the Commission’s 8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
believe that the proposed changes will 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
impair the ability of member 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
organizations or competing order 7 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:54 Dec 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_95926/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2016 / Notices 95679
The Exchange believes that the A proposed rule change filed under public in accordance with the
proposed deletion of two references to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 11 normally does not provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Rule 123D in Section 202.06B of the become operative prior to 30 days after available for Web site viewing and
Listed Company Manual is reasonable, the date of the filing. However, pursuant printing in the Commission’s Public
equitable and not unfairly to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),12 the Commission Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
discriminatory because the references may designate a shorter time if such Washington, DC 20549 on official
are obsolete. The proposed changes action is consistent with the protection business days between the hours of
would result in the removal of obsolete of investors and the public interest. 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
text from the Listed Company Manual At any time within 60 days of the filing also will be available for
and therefore add greater clarity to the filing of such proposed rule change, the inspection and copying at the principal
Listed Company Manual regarding halts Commission summarily may office of the Exchange. All comments
in trading. temporarily suspend such rule change if received will be posted without change;
The Exchange believes that the it appears to the Commission that such the Commission does not edit personal
proposed re-lettering of the remaining action is necessary or appropriate in the identifying information from
subsections of Rule 123D is reasonable, public interest, for the protection of submissions. You should submit only
equitable and not unfairly investors, or otherwise in furtherance of information that you wish to make
discriminatory because the proposed the purposes of the Act. If the available publicly. All submissions
change would add greater clarity to the Commission takes such action, the should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
Exchange’s rule book. Commission shall institute proceedings 2016–86 and should be submitted on or
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 13 of the Act to before January 18, 2017.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s determine whether the proposed rule For the Commission, by the Division of
Statement on Burden on Competition change should be approved or Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
disapproved. authority.14
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose IV. Solicitation of Comments
Eduardo A. Aleman,
any burden on competition that is not Interested persons are invited to Assistant Secretary.
necessary or appropriate in furtherance submit written data, views, and [FR Doc. 2016–31299 Filed 12–27–16; 8:45 am]
of the purposes of the Act. The arguments concerning the foregoing, BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
proposed change is not designed to including whether the proposed rule
address any competitive issue but rather change is consistent with the Act.
would streamline functionality, Comments may be submitted by any of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
eliminate an unnecessary step, and the following methods: COMMISSION
streamline forms, thereby reducing
confusion and making the Exchange’s Electronic Comments [Release No. 34–79645; File Nos. SR–
rules easier to understand and navigate. • Use the Commission’s Internet NYSEMKT–2016–52 and SR–NYSEArca
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 2016–103]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s rules/sro.shtml); or
Statement on Comments on the Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
• Send an email to rule-comments@
Proposed Rule Change Received From MKT LLC; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Members, Participants, or Others Designation of a Longer Period for
NYSE–2016–86 on the subject line.
Commission Action on Proceedings To
No written comments were solicited Paper Comments Determine Whether To Approve or
or received with respect to the proposed • Send paper comments in triplicate Disapprove Proposed Rule Changes
rule change. to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities To Extend the Time Within Which a
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street Member, Member Organization, an ATP
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Holder, an OTP Holder, or an OTP Firm
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Must File a Uniform Termination Notice
Commission Action All submissions should refer to File
for Securities Industry Registration
Number SR–NYSE–2016–86. This file
The Exchange has filed the proposed (‘‘Form U5’’) and Any Amendments
number should be included on the
rule change pursuant to Section Thereto
subject line if email is used. To help the
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 9 and Rule Commission process and review your December 21, 2016.
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.10 Because the comments more efficiently, please use On June 16, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC
proposed rule change does not: (i) only one method. The Commission will (‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with the Securities
significantly affect the protection of post all comments on the Commission’s and Exchange Commission
investors or the public interest; (ii) Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
impose any significant burden on rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act
competition; and (iii) become operative submission, all subsequent of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4
prior to 30 days from the date on which amendments, all written statements thereunder,3 a proposed rule change to
it was filed, or such shorter time as the with respect to the proposed rule extend the time within which a member
Commission may designate, if change that are filed with the or member organization, or an Amex
consistent with the protection of Commission, and all written Trading Permit Holder (‘‘ATP Holder’’)
investors and the public interest, the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
communications relating to the must file a Form U5, or any
proposed rule change has become proposed rule change between the amendments thereto. The proposed rule
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) Commission and any person, other than change was published for comment in
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) those that may be withheld from the
thereunder. 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:54 Dec 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_95926/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-28 02:16:35
Document Modified: 2016-12-28 02:16:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 95677 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR