81_FR_998 81 FR 993 - 30-Day Notice of Application for New Information Collection Request

81 FR 993 - 30-Day Notice of Application for New Information Collection Request

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 5 (January 8, 2016)

Page Range993-995
FR Document2016-00159

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below is being forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on the following information collection was published on Aug 5, 2015 (80 FR 46646).

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 5 (Friday, January 8, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 993-995]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0153]


30-Day Notice of Application for New Information Collection 
Request

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation 
(Department) or (DOT).

[[Page 994]]


ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below is being forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A 
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting 
comments on the following information collection was published on Aug 
5, 2015 (80 FR 46646).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 8, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Your comments should be identified by Docket No. DOT-OST-
2015-0153 and may be submitted through one of the following methods:
     Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer 
for U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, 
Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
     email: [email protected].
     Fax: (202) 395-5806. Attention: DOT/OST Desk Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, 
Office of the Secretary, W84-230, Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2278 or 
[email protected] (Email).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Mayors' Challenge for Safer People and Safer Streets Survey.
    Type of Request: Application for New Information Collection 
Request.
    Abstract: Approximately 260 cities are voluntarily participating in 
the ``Mayors' Challenge'' and through locally-driven efforts they are 
improving bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, and awareness. This 
survey will collect information on the accomplishments of the Mayors' 
Challenge, and will be used to identify best practices and to improve 
future DOT outreach to cities. Each city has already identified a 
point-of-contact for the Mayors' Challenge. This survey will be 
distributed electronically to these POCs through an online survey tool, 
and the proposed questions are attached.
    Affected Public: The 260 cities that voluntarily signed up to 
Mayor's Challenge.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 260.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 260.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; 
Cumulative 130 hours.
    Frequency of Collection: Once.
    Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 
chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 23, 2015.
Habib Azarsina,
OST Privacy and PRA Officer.

Mayors' Challenge for Safer People and Safer Streets Survey

    Abstract: Approximately 260 cities are voluntarily participating in 
the ``Mayors' Challenge'' and through locally-driven efforts they are 
improving bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, and awareness. This 
survey will collect information on the accomplishments of the Mayors' 
Challenge, and will be used to identify best practices and to improve 
future DOT outreach to cities. Each city has already identified a 
point-of-contact for the Mayors' Challenge. This survey will be 
distributed electronically to these POCs through an online survey tool.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; 
Cumulative 130 hours.
    Frequency of Collection: Once.
    For Further Information Contact: Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, 
Office of the Secretary, W84-230, Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2278 or 
[email protected] (Email).
    1. Which of the seven goals have you adopted, and what activities 
have you undertaken to meet those goals? For reference, the seven goals 
are:
    (1) Take a Complete Streets approach;
    (2) Identify and address barriers;
    (3) Gather and track data;
    (4) Use context-sensitive designs;
    (5) Complete bike-ped networks;
    (6) Improve laws and regulations; and
    (7) Educate and enforce proper road use.
    2. What have been the primary challenges and obstacles to bicycle 
and pedestrian safety in your community, and what if any actions have 
you taken to address these challenges and obstacles?
    3. What if any changes have resulted from the challenge activities?
    (1) Changes to physical infrastructure,
    (2) Decision-making processes,
    (3) Policies or procedures,
    (4) Enforcement,
    (5) Education and awareness of your community
    (6) Other:
    4. Please use the following table to indicate whether you have data 
on the impact of the Mayors' Challenge activities, and what the extent 
of that impact is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Data available? (E.g. yes/      Extent of impact (E.g.
                                                         no, and if yes, type of        number of bicyclists,
                                                                  data)              compared to previous years)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
event attendance....................................  ............................  ............................
survey results......................................  ............................  ............................
crash data..........................................  ............................  ............................
walking and bicycle counts..........................  ............................  ............................
bike lanes, sidewalks, other infrastructure.........  ............................  ............................
new plans, policies, laws, or campaigns.............  ............................  ............................
other indications of political and community support  ............................  ............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Which DOT resources, tools, and data have been most useful in 
your challenge?
    6. Which non-DOT resources, tools, and data have been most useful 
in your challenge?
    7. What resources, tools, and data do you wish were available?

[[Page 995]]

    8. What are the most useful formats for receiving information from 
USDOT, and why (e.g. webinars, in-person meetings, conference calls, 
etc.)?
    9. What efforts in your city to improve bicycle and pedestrian 
safety in your community were already underway at the time of the 
Mayors' Challenge? How has the Mayors' Challenge added value and/or 
helped to fill any gaps in your city's efforts to improve bicycle and 
pedestrian safety?
    10. In planning and project delivery of pedestrian and/or bicycle 
infrastructure projects, to what extent has your city coordinated with 
your Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Regional Planning 
Organization (RPO), State Department of Transportation (DOT), and 
Federal Regional/Division office partners? Please note type of outreach 
and coordination, and outcomes it led to.
    11. What have been the key benefits and lessons learned as a result 
of the Mayors' Challenge?
    12. Do you think the Mayors' challenge has helped make any 
permanent changes in pedestrian and bike safety and accommodation in 
your city/town?

[FR Doc. 2016-00159 Filed 1-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2016 / Notices 993 g. Personal financial statements; Cooperative Agreement; Office of Small monthly loan(s) in process report to h. Schedule of work in progress and Disadvantaged Business Utilization OSDBU. (WIP); U.S. Department of Transportation Short Respondents: 100. i. Signed and dated copy of Term Lending Program Certification Frequency: Monthly. transportation-related contracts; Regarding Debarment, Suspension. The Estimated Average Burden per j. Business debt schedule; STLP is subject to budgeting and Response: 1 hour. k. Cash flow projections; accounting requirements of the Federal Estimated Total Annual Burden l. Owner(s) and key management Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA). The Hours: 100 hours. resumes. PL must carry out processes to activate, DOT Form 2307–1: Drug-Free Respondents: Small Businesses, 100. monitor, service and close out STLP Workplace Act Certification for a Frequency: Once. loans. To fulfill the requirements of Grantee Other than an Individual. The Estimated Average Burden per FCRA, the PL submits reports and the PL certifies it is a drug-free workplace Response: 12 hours. following forms to OSDBU. by executing this certification. Estimated Total Annual Burden Respondents: Participating Lenders Respondents: 100. Hours: 1200 hours. that are in the process or have entered Frequency: Once. SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary, into cooperative agreements with DOT’s Estimated Average Burden per Office of Small and Disadvantaged OSDBU under 49 CFR part 22 DOT– Response: 15 minutes. Business Utilization (OSDBU), invites OST–2008–0236 entitled, ‘‘Short Term Estimated Total Annual Burden public comments on our intention to Lending Program’’. Hours: 25 hours. request the Office of Management and DOT Form 2303–1: Short Term DOT Form 2308–1. Certification Budget’s (OMB) approval to renew a Lending Program Bank Verification Regarding Lobbying for Contracts, collection of the STLP Participating Loan Activation Form. The PL must Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Lender (PL) forms. The collection submit a Loan Activation Form to Agreement. The PL certifies that no involves the use of the ‘‘Short Term OSDBU that indicates the date in which Federal funds will be utilized for Lending Program Bank Verification the loan has been activated. lobbying by executing this form. Respondents: 100. Respondents: 100. Loan Activation Form’’; ‘‘Short Term Frequency: Annually, up to five years. Lending Program Bank Frequency: Once. Estimated Average Burden per Estimated Average Burden per Acknowledgement Extension Request Response: 1⁄2 hour. Form’’; ‘‘Short Term Lending Program Response: 15 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Bank Acknowledgement Loan Close-Out Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours. Form’’; ‘‘Guaranty Loan Status Report’’; DOT Form 2310–1: Short Term Hours: 25 hours. ‘‘Pending Loan Status Report’’; ‘‘Drug- Lending Program Bank DOT Form 2309–1. Office of Small Free Workplace Act Certification for a Acknowledgement Extension Request and Disadvantaged Business Utilization Grantee Other than an Individual’’; Form. An extension of the original loan U.S. Department of Transportation Short ‘‘Certification Regarding Lobbying for guarantee for a maximum period of Term Lending Program Certification Contracts, Grants, Loans, and ninety (90) days may be requested, in Regarding Debarment, Suspension. The Cooperative Agreements’’; ‘‘Office of writing, by the PL using the STLP PL must not currently be debarred or Small and Disadvantaged Business Extension Request Form. suspended from participation in a Utilization U.S. Department of Respondents: 100. government contract or delinquent on a Transportation Short Term Lending Frequency: Annually. government debt by submitting this Program Certification Regarding Estimated Average Burden per form. Debarment, Suspension’’; ‘‘Cooperative Response: 1⁄2 hour. Respondents: 100. Agreement between the U.S. Estimated Total Annual Burden Frequency: Once. Department of Transportation and the Hours: 50 hours. Estimated Average Burden per Participating Lender’’; and ‘‘U.S. DOT Form 2304–1: Short Term Response: 15 minutes. Department of Transportation Office of Lending Program Bank Estimated Total Annual Burden Small and Disadvantaged Utilization Acknowledgement Loan Close-Out Hours: 25 hours. Short Term Lending Program Guarantee Form. The PL must submit the Loan Grand Total Annual Estimation of Agreement’’. The information collected Close-Out Form to OSDBU upon full Burden Hours: 1825. administers the loans guaranteed under repayment of the STLP loan or when the Issued in Washington, DC, on December the STLP. The information collected loan guarantee expires. 30, 2015. keeps the Participating Lender’s (PLs) in Respondents: 100. Habib Azarsina, compliance with the terms established Frequency: Annually. Estimated Average Burden per OST Privacy and PRA Officer. in the Cooperative Agreement between [FR Doc. 2015–33272 Filed 1–7–16; 8:45 am] DOT and the PLs. OMB Control No: Response: 1⁄2 hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P 2105–0555. Hours: 50 hours. Background: STLP loans are provided DOT Form 2305–1: Guaranty Loan through lenders that serve as STLP Status Report. The PL submits a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION participating Lenders (PL). The STLP monthly status of active guaranteed provides PLs a guarantee, up to 75%, on loans to OSDBU. Office of the Secretary mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES6 a revolving line of credit up to a Respondents: 100. $750,000 maximum. As part of the [Docket No. DOT–OST–2015–0153] Frequency: Monthly. requirements for approval as a PL, Estimated Average Burden per 30-Day Notice of Application for New lenders must submit the following Response: 1 hour. Information Collection Request certifications: Drug-Free Workplace Act Estimated Total Annual Burden Certification for a Grantee Other Than Hours: 100 hours. AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), An Individual; Certification Regarding DOT Form 2306–1: Pending Loan Department of Transportation Lobbying for Contracts, Grants, Loans, & Status Report. The PL submits a (Department) or (DOT). VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:39 Jan 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM 08JAN1

994 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2016 / Notices Notice and request for ACTION: information on the accomplishments of the Mayors’ Challenge, and will be used comments. the Mayors’ Challenge, and will be used to identify best practices and to improve to identify best practices and to improve future DOT outreach to cities. Each city SUMMARY: In compliance with the future DOT outreach to cities. Each city has already identified a point-of-contact Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 has already identified a point-of-contact for the Mayors’ Challenge. This survey U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice for the Mayors’ Challenge. This survey will be distributed electronically to announces that the Information will be distributed electronically to these POCs through an online survey Collection Request (ICR) abstracted these POCs through an online survey tool. below is being forwarded to the Office tool, and the proposed questions are Estimated Total Annual Burden of Management and Budget (OMB) for attached. Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; review and comments. A Federal Affected Public: The 260 cities that Cumulative 130 hours. Register Notice with a 60-day comment voluntarily signed up to Mayor’s Frequency of Collection: Once. period soliciting comments on the Challenge. For Further Information Contact: following information collection was Estimated Number of Respondents: Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, Office published on Aug 5, 2015 (80 FR 260. of the Secretary, W84–230, Department 46646). Estimated Number of Responses: 260. of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey DATES: Comments must be submitted on Estimated Total Annual Burden Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, or before February 8, 2016. Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; (202) 366–2278 or Cumulative 130 hours. anthony.burton@dot.gov (Email). ADDRESSES: Your comments should be Frequency of Collection: Once. identified by Docket No. DOT–OST– Comments are invited on: whether the 1. Which of the seven goals have you 2015–0153 and may be submitted proposed collection of information is adopted, and what activities have you through one of the following methods: necessary for the proper performance of undertaken to meet those goals? For • Office of Management and Budget, the functions of the Department, reference, the seven goals are: Attention: Desk Officer for U.S. including whether the information will (1) Take a Complete Streets approach; Department of Transportation, Office of have practical utility; the accuracy of (2) Identify and address barriers; Information and Regulatory Affairs, the Department’s estimate of the burden (3) Gather and track data; Office of Management and Budget, of the proposed information collection; (4) Use context-sensitive designs; Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th ways to enhance the quality, utility and (5) Complete bike-ped networks; Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. clarity of the information to be (6) Improve laws and regulations; and • email: collected; and ways to minimize the (7) Educate and enforce proper road oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. burden of the collection of information use. • Fax: (202) 395–5806. Attention: on respondents, including the use of 2. What have been the primary DOT/OST Desk Officer. automated collection techniques or challenges and obstacles to bicycle and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: other forms of information technology. pedestrian safety in your community, Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, Office Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act and what if any actions have you taken of the Secretary, W84–230, Department of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended; to address these challenges and of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey and 49 CFR 1:48. obstacles? Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Issued in Washington, DC on December 23, 3. What if any changes have resulted (202) 366–2278 or 2015. from the challenge activities? anthony.burton@dot.gov (Email). Habib Azarsina, (1) Changes to physical infrastructure, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OST Privacy and PRA Officer. (2) Decision-making processes, Title: Mayors’ Challenge for Safer (3) Policies or procedures, People and Safer Streets Survey. Mayors’ Challenge for Safer People and (4) Enforcement, Type of Request: Application for New Safer Streets Survey (5) Education and awareness of your Information Collection Request. Abstract: Approximately 260 cities community Abstract: Approximately 260 cities are voluntarily participating in the (6) Other: are voluntarily participating in the ‘‘Mayors’ Challenge’’ and through 4. Please use the following table to ‘‘Mayors’ Challenge’’ and through locally-driven efforts they are improving indicate whether you have data on the locally-driven efforts they are improving bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, impact of the Mayors’ Challenge bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, and awareness. This survey will collect activities, and what the extent of that and awareness. This survey will collect information on the accomplishments of impact is. Extent of impact (E.g. number Data available? (E.g. yes/no, of bicyclists, compared to pre- and if yes, type of data) vious years) event attendance ................................................................................................. .................................................. .................................................. survey results ....................................................................................................... .................................................. .................................................. crash data ............................................................................................................ .................................................. .................................................. walking and bicycle counts .................................................................................. .................................................. .................................................. bike lanes, sidewalks, other infrastructure .......................................................... .................................................. .................................................. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES6 new plans, policies, laws, or campaigns ............................................................. .................................................. .................................................. other indications of political and community support .......................................... .................................................. .................................................. 5. Which DOT resources, tools, and 6. Which non-DOT resources, tools, 7. What resources, tools, and data do data have been most useful in your and data have been most useful in your you wish were available? challenge? challenge? VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:39 Jan 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM 08JAN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2016 / Notices 995 8. What are the most useful formats SUMMARY: The Veteran’s Experience proposed collection of information; (3) for receiving information from USDOT, Office, Department of Veterans Affairs ways to enhance the quality, utility, and and why (e.g. webinars, in-person (VA), is announcing an opportunity for clarity of the information to be meetings, conference calls, etc.)? public comment on the proposed collected; and (4) ways to minimize the 9. What efforts in your city to improve collection of certain information by the burden of the collection of information bicycle and pedestrian safety in your agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction on respondents, including through the community were already underway at Act (PRA) of 1995, Federal agencies are use of automated collection techniques the time of the Mayors’ Challenge? How required to publish notice in the or the use of other forms of information has the Mayors’ Challenge added value Federal Register concerning each technology. and/or helped to fill any gaps in your proposed collection of information, Type of Review: Non-Substantive city’s efforts to improve bicycle and including each proposed non- Change of currently approved pedestrian safety? substantive change request of a collections. 10. In planning and project delivery of currently approved collection, and Abstract: For FY16–17, VA set pedestrian and/or bicycle infrastructure allow 60 days for public comment in Veterans Experience as an agency projects, to what extent has your city response to the notice. This notice priority goal to improve Veterans coordinated with your Metropolitan solicits comments on 11 Information Experience with VA. Because this is a Planning Organization (MPO), Regional collections for the Veteran’s Experience new measure, VA developed one brand Planning Organization (RPO), State Agency Priority Goal, which specifies and three experience measures to Department of Transportation (DOT), that four survey questions will be support the Veterans Experience Agency and Federal Regional/Division office incorporated into existing customer Priority Goal (APG). VA will add four partners? Please note type of outreach experience surveys by Q1 FY2016. The APG questions to each survey identified and coordination, and outcomes it led information collected will be used by below. One question deals with VA to. VA departmental leadership to track brand, and three questions deal with 11. What have been the key benefits enterprise performance improvements Veterans experience. and lessons learned as a result of the as experienced by our Veterans. This ‘‘I got the service I needed.’’ Mayors’ Challenge? notice will serve as notification for any ‘‘It was easy to get what I needed.’’ 12. Do you think the Mayors’ future Non-substantive Change ‘‘I felt like a valued customer.’’ challenge has helped make any Information Collection Request adding ‘‘I trust VA to fulfill our country’s permanent changes in pedestrian and these four customer service questions in commitment to veterans.’’ bike safety and accommodation in your the Information Collection Requests. Strongly agree city/town? DATES: Written comments and Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree [FR Doc. 2016–00159 Filed 1–7–16; 8:45 am] recommendations on the proposed Disagree BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P collection of information should be Strongly disagree received on or before March 8, 2016. Adding these questions is necessary ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to establish an enterprise measure of DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS on the collection of information through VA’s performance as experienced by our AFFAIRS Federal Docket Management System Veterans, as is needed to support VA’s (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov or to Veterans Experience FY16–17 APG. [OMB Control Nos., 2900–0782,, 2900–0770, 2900–0609, 2900–0701, 2900–0712, 2900– Thomas Pasakarnis, Veteran’s VA’s goal is to incorporate these four 0773, 2900–0838, 2900–0834, 2900–0836, Experience Office (008VE), Department survey questions into VA’s existing 2900–0837, 2900–0835] of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont customer experience by Q1 FY2016. The Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420 or information collected will be used by Proposed Information Collection email to Thomas.pasakarnis@va.gov. VA departmental leadership to track (Voice of Veteran Surveys, Generic Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900– enterprise performance improvements Clearance for the Collection of VE’’ in any correspondence. During the as experienced by our Veterans. Qualitative Feedback on Agency comment period, comments may be VA expects that it will take Service Delivery (National Cemetery viewed online through the FDMS. approximately one minute for each Administration, Veterans Benefits FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: survey respondent to answer these new Affairs, Veterans Health Thomas Pasakarnis at (202) 461–5869 or questions. As set forth below, this Administration), Survey of Veteran FAX (202) 495–5401. change is expected to affect Enrollees’ Health and Reliance Upon SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the approximately 132 instruments VA, Bereaved Family Member PRA of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. approved under eleven different OMB Satisfaction Survey, Nation-Wide 3501–21), Federal agencies must obtain control numbers. Together, these Customer Satisfaction Surveys approval from the Office of Management instruments are nearly 1.5 million times (Survey of Healthcare Experiences of and Budget (OMB) for each collection of per year. The cumulative annual burden Patients), Veterans Health Benefits information they conduct or sponsor. of this change is more than 24,000 hours Handbook Satisfaction Survey, This request for comment is being made ((1 minute per submission * 1,462,937 Veterans Transportation Service Data pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the submissions)/60 minutes per hour = Collection, Center for Verification and PRA. 24,382.28 hours). There is also some Evaluation Site Inspections, Post With respect to the following annual cost burden associated with this mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES6 Engagement, Awards & Return on collection of information, Veteran’s request. Specifically, some of these Investment, Center for Verification and Experience invites comments on: (1) instruments are administered by third- Evaluation Verification Survey) Whether the proposed collection of party contractors, who will need to Activity: Comment Request information is necessary for the proper revise the instruments. AGENCY: Veteran’s Experience Office, performance of VBA’s functions, VA has provided a table detailing the Department of Veterans Affairs. including whether the information will full burden information for each have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of information collection located at http:// ACTION: Notice. VA’s estimate of the burden of the www.oprm.va.gov/ers/ers_reports.aspx. VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:39 Jan 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM 08JAN1


Document Created: 2016-01-16 01:14:25
Document Modified: 2016-01-16 01:14:25
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice and request for comments.
DatesComments must be submitted on or before February 8, 2016.
ContactAnthony Burton, Office of Policy, Office of the Secretary, W84-230, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2278 or [email protected] (Email).
FR Citation81 FR 993 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR