82 FR 11066 - Southern Nuclear Company, Inc.; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 32 (February 17, 2017)

Page Range		11066-11068
FR Document		2017-03237
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is making a finding of no significant impact for a proposed issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5, held by Southern Nuclear Company, Inc. (SNC, the licensee) for the operation of Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (Hatch), Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively, located in Appling County, Georgia. The proposed amendments would allow for the adoption of a common (fleet-wide) SNC Standard Emergency Plan (SEP), with site-specific annexes.
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 32 (Friday, February 17, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 32 (Friday, February 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11066-11068]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366; NRC-2017-0045]


Southern Nuclear Company, Inc.; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, 
Units 1 and 2

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; 
issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is making a 
finding of no significant impact for a proposed issuance of an 
amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5, 
held by Southern Nuclear Company, Inc. (SNC, the licensee) for the 
operation of Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (Hatch), Unit 1 and Unit 2, 
respectively, located in Appling County, Georgia. The proposed 
amendments would allow for the adoption of a common (fleet-wide) SNC 
Standard Emergency Plan (SEP), with site-specific annexes.

DATES: February 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0045 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0045. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by

[[Page 11067]]

email to [email protected]. For the convenience of the reader, the 
ADAMS accession numbers are provided in a table in the ``Availability 
of Documents'' section of this document.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn A. Williams, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1009; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    The NRC is considering issuance of amendments pursuant to Sec.  
50.54 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), 
``Conditions of licenses,'' paragraph (q), to Renewed Facility 
Operating License Nos DPR-57 and NPF-5, held by Southern Nuclear 
Company, Inc. (SNC, the licensee) for the operation of Edwin I. Hatch 
Nuclear Plant (Hatch), Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively, located in 
Georgia, Appling County.
    In accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has prepared an 
environmental assessment (EA) that analyzes the environmental effects 
of the proposed licensing action. Based on the results of the 
environmental assessment, and in accordance with 10 CFR 51.31(a), the 
NRC has prepared a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the 
proposed amendments.

II. Environmental Assessment

Description of the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would revise Hatch, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Renewed 
Facility Operating Licenses in order to allow the adoption of a fleet-
wide SNC Standard Emergency Plan (SEP) that includes site-specific 
annexes. If approved, the SEP would establish an updated licensing 
basis for the SNC fleet of nuclear power plants (Farley, Units 1 and 2; 
Edwin I Hatch, Units 1 and 2; and Vogtle Electric Generating Plants 
Station; Units 1, 2, 3, and 4) that complies with current NRC's 
regulations at 10 CFR 50.47, 10 CFR 50, appendix E, and NUREG-0654/
FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1.
    Notable proposed changes are (a) adoption of a standard staff 
augmentation time period of 75 minutes from time of declaration of an 
Alert or higher Emergency Classification, (b) changes in staffing 
numbers, (c) changes in staffing duties, and (d) consolidation of the 
Joint Information Center.
    The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
application dated August 31, 2015, as supplemented by letters dated 
February 17, 2016; April 8, 2016; May 26, 2016; June 9, 2016; and 
November 2, 2016, respectively.

Need for the Proposed Action

    Nuclear power plant owners, government agencies, and State and 
local officials work together to create a system for emergency 
preparedness and response that will serve the public in the unlikely 
event of an emergency. An effective emergency preparedness program 
decreases the likelihood of an initiating event at a nuclear power 
reactor proceeding to a severe accident. Emergency preparedness cannot 
affect the probability of the initiating event, but a high level of 
emergency preparedness increases the probability of accident mitigation 
if the initiating event proceeds beyond the need for initial operator 
actions.
    Each licensee is required to establish emergency plans to be 
implemented in the event of an accident. These emergency plans cover 
preparations for evacuation, sheltering, and other actions to protect 
residents near plants in the event of a serious incident.
    The NRC, as well as other federal and state regulatory agencies 
review the subject plans to ensure that the condition of emergency 
preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective 
measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological 
emergency.
    Separate from this EA, the NRC staff is evaluating SNC's proposed 
changes to the SEP for Hatch. This review will be documented in the 
safety evaluation report for the proposed license amendment. The 
staff's review will determine whether there is reasonable assurance 
that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of 
a radiological emergency in accordance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) through 
(b)(16), and the requirements in appendix E to 10 CFR part 50.
    The proposed action is needed to make SNC's fleet of nuclear power 
plants (SNC fleet) emergency plans easier to follow and understand. By 
standardizing emergency plans, with site specific annexes, SNC will 
align the SNC fleet using consistent standards and definitions. This 
will improve the consistency throughout the SNC fleet regarding: (1) 
Emergency planning organizations, (2) duties and responsibilities of 
emergency personnel, (3) procedures, and (4) training.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action. The 
proposed action consists mainly of administrative changes related to 
the rearrangement of NRC-approved Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle emergency 
plans into one SNC SEP with site-specific annexes. Notable changes 
include (a) the adoption of a standard staff augmentation time period 
of 75 minutes from time of declaration of an Alert or higher Emergency 
Classification (b) changes in staffing numbers, (c) changes in staffing 
duties, and (d) consolidation of the Joint Information Center.
    The proposed changes would have no direct impacts on land use or 
water resources, including terrestrial and aquatic biota as the 
proposed action involves no new construction or modification of plant 
operational systems. There would be no changes to the quality or 
quantity of non-radiological effluents. No changes to the plant's 
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit are needed. 
Changes in staffing levels associated with the adopted SEP, and site-
specific annex for Hatch, could result in minor changes in vehicular 
traffic and associated air pollutant emissions, but no significant 
changes in ambient air quality would be expected. In addition, there 
would be no noticeable effect on socioeconomic conditions in the 
region, no environment justice impacts, and no impacts to historic and 
cultural resources. Therefore, there would be no significant non-
radiological impacts associated with the proposed.
    The NRC has concluded that the proposed action would not 
significantly affect plant safety and would not have a significant 
adverse effect on the probability of an accident occurring. There would 
be no change to radioactive effluents that affect radiation exposures 
to plant workers and members of the public. No changes would be made to 
plant buildings or the site property. Therefore, the proposed action 
would not result in a change to the radiation exposures to the public 
or radiation exposure to plant workers.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC considered denial 
of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). Denial of 
the license amendment request would result in no change in current 
environmental impacts.

[[Page 11068]]

Alternative Use of Resources

    There are no unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of 
available resources under the proposed action.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    On January 11, 2017, the NRC staff consulted with the Georgia State 
official, Mr. B. Simonton, Georgia Environmental Protection Division, 
regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The state 
official had no comments.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    The licensee has requested license amendments pursuant to 10 CFR 
50.54(q) to adopt a fleet-wide SEP, with a specific annex, for Edwin I. 
Hatch, Unit 1 and 2. The NRC is considering issuing the requested 
amendments. The proposed action would not significantly affect plant 
safety, would not have a significant adverse effect on the probability 
of an accident occurring, and would not have any significant 
radiological and non-radiological impacts. The reason the environment 
would not be significantly affected is because the proposed changes 
would only result in minor changes in staffing levels and associated 
vehicular traffic, along with a small increase in air pollutant 
emissions. This FONSI incorporates by reference the EA in Section II of 
this notice. Therefore, the NRC concludes that the proposed action will 
not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. 
Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental 
impact statement for the proposed action.
    The related environmental document is the ``Generic Environmental 
Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Edwin 
I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Final Report,'' NUREG-1437, 
Supplement 4. NUREG-1437, Supplement 4 provides the latest 
environmental review of current operations and description of 
environmental conditions at Hatch.
    The finding and other related environmental documents may be 
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room 
(PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly-available records will be 
accessible electronically from ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room on 
the Internet at the NRC's Web site: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
    Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems 
in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's 
PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or 
send an email to [email protected].

IV. Availability of Documents

    The documents identified in the following table are available to 
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as 
indicated.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                ADAMS Accession No./Web link/Federal Register
                          Document                                                 Citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, License Amendment        ML15246A045
 Request for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated
 August 31, 2015.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Response to Request For  ML16060A283
 Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request
 for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated February
 17, 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Response to Request For  ML16105A194
 Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request
 for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated April 8,
 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Corrected Response to    ML16147A294
 Request For Additional Information Regarding License
 Amendment Request for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan,
 Dated May 26, 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Response to Request For  ML16167A468
 Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request
 for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated June 9,
 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Letter RE: Standard      ML16307A404
 Emergency Plan Implementation Date, Dated November 2, 2016.
NUREG-1437, Supplement 4, Generic Environmental Impact       ML011420018
 Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Edwin I.
 Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Final Report, Dated
 May 2001.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of February 2017.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Shawn A. Williams,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-1, Division of Operating 
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2017-03237 Filed 2-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 32 / Friday, February 17, 2017 / Notices 11067

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For the The proposed action is in accordance Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
convenience of the reader, the ADAMS with the licensee’s application dated Action
accession numbers are provided in a August 31, 2015, as supplemented by
table in the ‘‘Availability of Documents’’ letters dated February 17, 2016; April 8, The NRC has completed its evaluation
section of this document. 2016; May 26, 2016; June 9, 2016; and of the proposed action. The proposed
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and November 2, 2016, respectively. action consists mainly of administrative
purchase copies of public documents at changes related to the rearrangement of
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One Need for the Proposed Action NRC-approved Farley, Hatch, and
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Vogtle emergency plans into one SNC
Nuclear power plant owners, SEP with site-specific annexes. Notable
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
government agencies, and State and changes include (a) the adoption of a
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: local officials work together to create a
Shawn A. Williams, Office of Nuclear standard staff augmentation time period
system for emergency preparedness and of 75 minutes from time of declaration
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear response that will serve the public in
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC of an Alert or higher Emergency
the unlikely event of an emergency. An Classification (b) changes in staffing
20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–1009; effective emergency preparedness
email: Shawn.Williams@nrc.gov. numbers, (c) changes in staffing duties,
program decreases the likelihood of an and (d) consolidation of the Joint
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: initiating event at a nuclear power Information Center.
I. Introduction reactor proceeding to a severe accident.
Emergency preparedness cannot affect The proposed changes would have no
The NRC is considering issuance of direct impacts on land use or water
the probability of the initiating event,
amendments pursuant to § 50.54 of title resources, including terrestrial and
but a high level of emergency
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations aquatic biota as the proposed action
preparedness increases the probability
(10 CFR), ‘‘Conditions of licenses,’’ involves no new construction or
of accident mitigation if the initiating
paragraph (q), to Renewed Facility modification of plant operational
event proceeds beyond the need for
Operating License Nos DPR–57 and systems. There would be no changes to
initial operator actions.
NPF–5, held by Southern Nuclear the quality or quantity of non-
Company, Inc. (SNC, the licensee) for Each licensee is required to establish radiological effluents. No changes to the
the operation of Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear emergency plans to be implemented in plant’s National Pollutant Discharge
Plant (Hatch), Unit 1 and Unit 2, the event of an accident. These Elimination System permit are needed.
respectively, located in Georgia, emergency plans cover preparations for Changes in staffing levels associated
Appling County. evacuation, sheltering, and other actions with the adopted SEP, and site-specific
In accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the to protect residents near plants in the annex for Hatch, could result in minor
NRC has prepared an environmental event of a serious incident. changes in vehicular traffic and
assessment (EA) that analyzes the The NRC, as well as other federal and associated air pollutant emissions, but
environmental effects of the proposed state regulatory agencies review the no significant changes in ambient air
licensing action. Based on the results of subject plans to ensure that the quality would be expected. In addition,
the environmental assessment, and in condition of emergency preparedness there would be no noticeable effect on
accordance with 10 CFR 51.31(a), the provides reasonable assurance that socioeconomic conditions in the region,
NRC has prepared a finding of no adequate protective measures can and no environment justice impacts, and no
significant impact (FONSI) for the will be taken in the event of a impacts to historic and cultural
proposed amendments. radiological emergency. resources. Therefore, there would be no
II. Environmental Assessment Separate from this EA, the NRC staff significant non-radiological impacts
is evaluating SNC’s proposed changes to associated with the proposed.
Description of the Proposed Action
the SEP for Hatch. This review will be The NRC has concluded that the
The proposed action would revise documented in the safety evaluation proposed action would not significantly
Hatch, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Renewed report for the proposed license affect plant safety and would not have
Facility Operating Licenses in order to amendment. The staff’s review will a significant adverse effect on the
allow the adoption of a fleet-wide SNC determine whether there is reasonable probability of an accident occurring.
Standard Emergency Plan (SEP) that assurance that adequate protective There would be no change to
includes site-specific annexes. If measures can and will be taken in the radioactive effluents that affect radiation
approved, the SEP would establish an event of a radiological emergency in exposures to plant workers and
updated licensing basis for the SNC fleet
accordance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) members of the public. No changes
of nuclear power plants (Farley, Units 1
through (b)(16), and the requirements in would be made to plant buildings or the
and 2; Edwin I Hatch, Units 1 and 2;
appendix E to 10 CFR part 50. site property. Therefore, the proposed
and Vogtle Electric Generating Plants
Station; Units 1, 2, 3, and 4) that The proposed action is needed to action would not result in a change to
complies with current NRC’s regulations make SNC’s fleet of nuclear power the radiation exposures to the public or
at 10 CFR 50.47, 10 CFR 50, appendix plants (SNC fleet) emergency plans radiation exposure to plant workers.
E, and NUREG–0654/FEMA–REP–1, easier to follow and understand. By Environmental Impacts of the
Revision 1. standardizing emergency plans, with Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Notable proposed changes are (a) site specific annexes, SNC will align the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

adoption of a standard staff SNC fleet using consistent standards As an alternative to the proposed
augmentation time period of 75 minutes and definitions. This will improve the action, the NRC considered denial of the
from time of declaration of an Alert or consistency throughout the SNC fleet proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
higher Emergency Classification, (b) regarding: (1) Emergency planning alternative). Denial of the license
changes in staffing numbers, (c) changes organizations, (2) duties and amendment request would result in no
in staffing duties, and (d) consolidation responsibilities of emergency personnel, change in current environmental
of the Joint Information Center. (3) procedures, and (4) training. impacts.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:38 Feb 16, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM 17FEN1
11068 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 32 / Friday, February 17, 2017 / Notices

Alternative Use of Resources impacts. The reason the environment The finding and other related
There are no unresolved conflicts would not be significantly affected is environmental documents may be
concerning alternative uses of available because the proposed changes would examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
resources under the proposed action. only result in minor changes in staffing NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR),
levels and associated vehicular traffic, located at One White Flint North, 11555
Agencies and Persons Consulted along with a small increase in air Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
On January 11, 2017, the NRC staff pollutant emissions. This FONSI 20852. Publicly-available records will
consulted with the Georgia State incorporates by reference the EA in be accessible electronically from
official, Mr. B. Simonton, Georgia Section II of this notice. Therefore, the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading
Environmental Protection Division, NRC concludes that the proposed action Room on the Internet at the NRC’s Web
regarding the environmental impact of will not have a significant effect on the site: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
the proposed action. The state official quality of the human environment. adams.html.
had no comments. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
Persons who do not have access to
III. Finding of No Significant Impact not to prepare an environmental impact
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
statement for the proposed action.
The licensee has requested license accessing the documents located in
amendments pursuant to 10 CFR The related environmental document ADAMS should contact the NRC’s PDR
50.54(q) to adopt a fleet-wide SEP, with is the ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
a specific annex, for Edwin I. Hatch, Statement for License Renewal of 397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or send an
Unit 1 and 2. The NRC is considering Nuclear Plants: Regarding Edwin I. email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
issuing the requested amendments. The Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2,
proposed action would not significantly Final Report,’’ NUREG–1437, IV. Availability of Documents
affect plant safety, would not have a Supplement 4. NUREG–1437,
Supplement 4 provides the latest The documents identified in the
significant adverse effect on the
probability of an accident occurring, environmental review of current following table are available to
and would not have any significant operations and description of interested persons through one or more
radiological and non-radiological environmental conditions at Hatch. of the following methods, as indicated.

ADAMS Accession No./
Document Web link/Federal Register
Citation

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, License Amendment Request for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, ML15246A045
Dated August 31, 2015.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Response to Request For Additional Information Regarding License ML16060A283
Amendment Request for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated February 17, 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Response to Request For Additional Information Regarding License ML16105A194
Amendment Request for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated April 8, 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Corrected Response to Request For Additional Information Regarding Li- ML16147A294
cense Amendment Request for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated May 26, 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Response to Request For Additional Information Regarding License ML16167A468
Amendment Request for Adoption of Standard Emergency Plan, Dated June 9, 2016.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Letter RE: Standard Emergency Plan Implementation Date, Dated Novem- ML16307A404
ber 2, 2016.
NUREG–1437, Supplement 4, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants ML011420018
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Final Report, Dated May 2001.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day STATUS: Public and Closed. the Nuclear Materials Users
of February 2017. Business Lines (Public Meeting)
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Week of February 20, 2017
(Contact: Soly Soto; 301–415–7528)
Shawn A. Williams, Thursday, February 23, 2017 This meeting will be webcast live at
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II– 9:30 a.m. Joint Meeting of the Federal the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov/.
1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Energy Regulatory Commission and Week of March 6, 2017—Tentative
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
[FR Doc. 2017–03237 Filed 2–16–17; 8:45 am] There are no meetings scheduled for
(Public Meeting) (Contact: Denise
the week of March 6, 2017.
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P McGovern)
This meeting will be webcast live at Week of March 13, 2017—Tentative
NUCLEAR REGULATORY the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov/. There are no meetings scheduled for
COMMISSION Week of February 27, 2017—Tentative the week of March 13, 2017.
[NRC–2017–0001] Wednesday, March 1, 2017 Week of March 20, 2017—Tentative
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

10:00 a.m. Briefing on NRC Thursday, March 23, 2017
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
International Activities (Closed Ex. 9:00 a.m Hearing on Combined
DATE: Weeks of February 20, 27, March 1 & 9) Licenses for North Anna Nuclear
6, 13, 20, 27, 2017. Plant, Unit 3: Section 189a. of the
Thursday, March 2, 2017
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference Atomic Energy Act Proceeding
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 9:00 a.m. Strategic Programmatic (Public Meeting) (Contact: James
Maryland. Overview of the Fuel Facilities and Shea: 301–415–1388)

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:38 Feb 16, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM 17FEN1
Document Created: 2017-02-17 00:28:47
Document Modified: 2017-02-17 00:28:47
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance.
Dates		February 17, 2017.
Contact		Shawn A. Williams, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1009; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 11066