82_FR_12886 82 FR 12843 - Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From Japan, Korea, and Taiwan Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews

82 FR 12843 - Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From Japan, Korea, and Taiwan Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 43 (March 7, 2017)

Page Range12843-12844
FR Document2017-04372

The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on stainless steel sheet and strip from Korea and the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel sheet and strip from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 43 (Tuesday, March 7, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12843-12844]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-382 and 731-TA-800, 801, and 803 (Third 
Review)]


Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From Japan, Korea, and Taiwan 
Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full 
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to determine 
whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on stainless steel 
sheet and strip from Korea and the antidumping duty orders on stainless 
steel sheet and strip from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a 
reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise 
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days.

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Szustakowski ((202) 205-3169), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background.--On October 4, 2016, the Commission determined that 
responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews 
were such that full reviews should proceed (81 FR 71533, October 17, 
2016); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to 
section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A 
record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on 
adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements are available 
from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.
    Participation in the reviews and public service list.--Persons, 
including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the 
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer 
organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must 
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as 
provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after 
publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance 
following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the 
reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary 
will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses 
of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the 
reviews.
    For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and 
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), 
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
    Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under 
an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary 
will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized 
applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the 
application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. 
Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 
19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted 
access to BPI following publication of the Commission's notice of 
institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate 
service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties 
authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
    Staff report.--The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be 
placed in the nonpublic record on June 29, 2017, and a public version 
will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the 
Commission's rules.
    Hearing.--The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the 
review beginning at 9:30 a.m. on July 25, 2017, at the U.S. 
International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the 
hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission 
on or before July 17, 2017. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid 
the Commission's deliberations may request permission to present a 
short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to 
appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should participate in 
a prehearing conference to be held on July 24, 2017, at the U.S. 
International Trade Commission Building, if deemed necessary. Oral 
testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing 
are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of 
the Commission's rules. Parties must submit any request to present a 
portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business 
days prior to the date of the hearing.
    Written submissions.--Each party to the reviews may submit a 
prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with 
the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the 
deadline for filing is July 14, 2017. Parties may also file written 
testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as 
provided in section 207.24 of the Commission's rules, and posthearing 
briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the 
Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is 
August 3, 2017. In addition, any person who has not entered an 
appearance as a party to the review may submit a written statement of 
information pertinent to the subject of the review on or before August 
3, 2017. On August 23, 2017, the Commission will make available to 
parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to 
comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or 
before August 25, 2017, but such final comments must not contain new 
factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of 
the Commission's rules. All

[[Page 12844]]

written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 
of the Commission's rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also 
conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of 
the Commission's rules. The Commission's Handbook on E-Filing, 
available on the Commission's Web site at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon 
the Commission's rules with respect to electronic filing.
    Additional written submissions to the Commission, including 
requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall 
not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such 
submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request 
by a Commissioner or Commission staff.
    In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's 
rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on 
all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or 
BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. 
The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a 
certificate of service.
    The Commission has determined that these reviews are 
extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise 
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 
19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B).

    Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: March 2, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-04372 Filed 3-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 7, 2017 / Notices                                            12843

                                                publishing the notice in the Federal                    General information concerning the                    of institution of the reviews need not
                                                Register on November 8, 2016 (81 FR                     Commission may also be obtained by                    reapply for such access. A separate
                                                78631). The hearing was held in                         accessing its internet server (https://               service list will be maintained by the
                                                Washington, DC, on January 12, 2017,                    www.usitc.gov). The public record for                 Secretary for those parties authorized to
                                                and all persons who requested the                       these reviews may be viewed on the                    receive BPI under the APO.
                                                opportunity were permitted to appear in                 Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)                    Staff report.—The prehearing staff
                                                person or by counsel.                                   at https://edis.usitc.gov.                            report in the reviews will be placed in
                                                  The Commission made these                             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            the nonpublic record on June 29, 2017,
                                                determinations pursuant to sections                        Background.—On October 4, 2016,                    and a public version will be issued
                                                705(b) and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.                 the Commission determined that                        thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of
                                                1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It                    responses to its notice of institution of             the Commission’s rules.
                                                completed and filed its determinations                                                                           Hearing.—The Commission will hold
                                                                                                        the subject five-year reviews were such
                                                in these investigations on March 2,                                                                           a hearing in connection with the review
                                                                                                        that full reviews should proceed (81 FR
                                                2017. The views of the Commission are                                                                         beginning at 9:30 a.m. on July 25, 2017,
                                                                                                        71533, October 17, 2016); accordingly,
                                                contained in USITC Publication 4671                                                                           at the U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                        full reviews are being scheduled
                                                (March 2017), entitled Ammonium                                                                               Commission Building. Requests to
                                                                                                        pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the
                                                Sulfate From China: Investigation Nos.                                                                        appear at the hearing should be filed in
                                                                                                        Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)).
                                                701–TA–562 and 731–TA–1329 (Final).                                                                           writing with the Secretary to the
                                                                                                        A record of the Commissioners’ votes,
                                                                                                                                                              Commission on or before July 17, 2017.
                                                  By order of the Commission.                           the Commission’s statement on
                                                                                                                                                              A nonparty who has testimony that may
                                                  Issued: March 2, 2017.                                adequacy, and any individual
                                                                                                                                                              aid the Commission’s deliberations may
                                                Lisa R. Barton,                                         Commissioner’s statements are available               request permission to present a short
                                                Secretary to the Commission.                            from the Office of the Secretary and at               statement at the hearing. All parties and
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–04397 Filed 3–6–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        the Commission’s Web site.                            nonparties desiring to appear at the
                                                                                                           Participation in the reviews and                   hearing and make oral presentations
                                                BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                        public service list.—Persons, including               should participate in a prehearing
                                                                                                        industrial users of the subject                       conference to be held on July 24, 2017,
                                                INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                     merchandise and, if the merchandise is                at the U.S. International Trade
                                                COMMISSION                                              sold at the retail level, representative              Commission Building, if deemed
                                                                                                        consumer organizations, wishing to                    necessary. Oral testimony and written
                                                [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–382 and 731–                 participate in these reviews as parties
                                                TA–800, 801, and 803 (Third Review)]                                                                          materials to be submitted at the public
                                                                                                        must file an entry of appearance with                 hearing are governed by sections
                                                                                                        the Secretary to the Commission, as                   201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and
                                                Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From
                                                                                                        provided in section 201.11 of the                     207.66 of the Commission’s rules.
                                                Japan, Korea, and Taiwan Scheduling
                                                                                                        Commission’s rules, by 45 days after                  Parties must submit any request to
                                                of Full Five-Year Reviews
                                                                                                        publication of this notice. A party that              present a portion of their hearing
                                                AGENCY: United States International                     filed a notice of appearance following                testimony in camera no later than 7
                                                Trade Commission.                                       publication of the Commission’s notice                business days prior to the date of the
                                                ACTION: Notice.                                         of institution of the reviews need not                hearing.
                                                                                                        file an additional notice of appearance.                 Written submissions.—Each party to
                                                SUMMARY:    The Commission hereby gives                 The Secretary will maintain a public                  the reviews may submit a prehearing
                                                notice of the scheduling of full reviews                service list containing the names and                 brief to the Commission. Prehearing
                                                pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the               addresses of all persons, or their                    briefs must conform with the provisions
                                                Act’’) to determine whether revocation                  representatives, who are parties to the               of section 207.65 of the Commission’s
                                                of the countervailing duty order on                     reviews.                                              rules; the deadline for filing is July 14,
                                                stainless steel sheet and strip from                       For further information concerning                 2017. Parties may also file written
                                                Korea and the antidumping duty orders                   the conduct of these reviews and rules                testimony in connection with their
                                                on stainless steel sheet and strip from                 of general application, consult the                   presentation at the hearing, as provided
                                                Japan, Korea, and Taiwan would be                       Commission’s Rules of Practice and                    in section 207.24 of the Commission’s
                                                likely to lead to continuation or                       Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B                 rules, and posthearing briefs, which
                                                recurrence of material injury within a                  (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,                      must conform with the provisions of
                                                reasonably foreseeable time. The                        subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part                  section 207.67 of the Commission’s
                                                Commission has determined to exercise                   207).                                                 rules. The deadline for filing
                                                its authority to extend the review period                  Limited disclosure of business                     posthearing briefs is August 3, 2017. In
                                                by up to 90 days.                                       proprietary information (BPI) under an                addition, any person who has not
                                                DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2017.                   administrative protective order (APO)                 entered an appearance as a party to the
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        and BPI service list.—Pursuant to                     review may submit a written statement
                                                Michael Szustakowski ((202) 205–3169),                  section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s                  of information pertinent to the subject of
                                                Office of Investigations, U.S.                          rules, the Secretary will make BPI                    the review on or before August 3, 2017.
                                                International Trade Commission, 500 E                   gathered in these reviews available to                On August 23, 2017, the Commission
                                                Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.                       authorized applicants under the APO                   will make available to parties all
                                                Hearing-impaired persons can obtain                     issued in the reviews, provided that the              information on which they have not had
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                information on this matter by contacting                application is made by 45 days after                  an opportunity to comment. Parties may
                                                the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–                   publication of this notice. Authorized                submit final comments on this
                                                205–1810. Persons with mobility                         applicants must represent interested                  information on or before August 25,
                                                impairments who will need special                       parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),             2017, but such final comments must not
                                                assistance in gaining access to the                     who are parties to the reviews. A party               contain new factual information and
                                                Commission should contact the Office                    granted access to BPI following                       must otherwise comply with section
                                                of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.                       publication of the Commission’s notice                207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:01 Mar 06, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00062   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM   07MRN1


                                                12844                          Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 7, 2017 / Notices

                                                written submissions must conform with                   Commission has determined to review                   64 of the ’668 patent. The ALJ found no
                                                the provisions of section 201.8 of the                  in part the presiding administrative law              violation of section 337 with respect to
                                                Commission’s rules; any submissions                     judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial                       claim 2 of the ’577 patent; claims 46 and
                                                that contain BPI must also conform with                 determination (‘‘Final ID’’) issued on                63 of the ’853 patent; claims 1, 3, and
                                                the requirements of sections 201.6,                     December 9, 2016, finding a violation of              4 of the ’492 patent; claims 1–4, and 10
                                                207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s                    section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as             of the ’875 patent; and claims 2, 6, 13,
                                                rules. The Commission’s Handbook on                     amended, (‘‘section 337’’) in the above-              and 17 of the ’211 patent.
                                                E-Filing, available on the Commission’s                 captioned investigation.                                 In particular, the Final ID finds that
                                                Web site at https://www.usitc.gov/                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      Cisco has shown by a preponderance of
                                                secretary/documents/handbook_on_                        Megan M. Valentine, Office of the                     the evidence that the accused products
                                                filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon                  General Counsel, U.S. International                   infringe asserted claims 1, 7, 9, 10, and
                                                the Commission’s rules with respect to                  Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,                   15 of the ’577 patent; and asserted
                                                electronic filing.                                      Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)                 claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 18, 56, and
                                                   Additional written submissions to the                708–2301. Copies of non-confidential                  64 of the ’668 patent. The Final ID finds
                                                Commission, including requests                          documents filed in connection with this               that Cisco has failed to show by a
                                                pursuant to section 201.12 of the                       investigation are or will be available for            preponderance of the evidence that the
                                                Commission’s rules, shall not be                        inspection during official business                   accused products infringe asserted
                                                accepted unless good cause is shown for                 hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the                 claim 2 of the ’577 patent; asserted
                                                accepting such submissions, or unless                   Office of the Secretary, U.S.                         claims 46 and 63 of the ’853 patent;
                                                the submission is pursuant to a specific                International Trade Commission, 500 E                 asserted claims 1, 3, and 4 of the ’492
                                                request by a Commissioner or                            Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                     patent; asserted claims 1–4, and 10 of
                                                Commission staff.                                       telephone (202) 205–2000. General                     the ’875 patent; and asserted claims 2,
                                                   In accordance with sections 201.16(c)                information concerning the Commission                 6, 13, and 17 of the ’211 patent.
                                                and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,                    may also be obtained by accessing its                    The Final ID also finds that assignor
                                                each document filed by a party to the                   Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.             estoppel bars Arista from asserting that
                                                reviews must be served on all other                     The public record for this investigation              the ’577 and ’853 patents are invalid.
                                                parties to the reviews (as identified by                may be viewed on the Commission’s                     The Final ID finds, however, that if
                                                either the public or BPI service list), and             electronic docket (EDIS) at https://                  assignor estoppel did not apply, Arista
                                                a certificate of service must be timely                 edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                      has shown by clear and convincing
                                                filed. The Secretary will not accept a                  persons are advised that information on               evidence that claims 1, 7, 9, 10, and 15
                                                document for filing without a certificate               this matter can be obtained by                        of the ’577 patent and claim 46 of the
                                                of service.                                             contacting the Commission’s TDD                       ’853 patent are invalid as anticipated by
                                                   The Commission has determined that                   terminal on (202) 205–1810.                           U.S. Patent No. 5,920,886
                                                these reviews are extraordinarily                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                        (‘‘Feldmeier’’). The Final ID further
                                                complicated and therefore has                           Commission instituted this investigation              finds that Arista has failed to show by
                                                determined to exercise its authority to                 on January 27, 2015, based on a                       clear and convincing evidence that any
                                                extend the review period by up to 90                    Complaint filed by Cisco Systems, Inc.                of the remaining asserted claims are
                                                days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B).                of San Jose, California (‘‘Cisco’’). 80 FR            invalid. The Final ID also finds that
                                                  Authority: These reviews are being                    4313–14 (Jan. 27, 2015). The Complaint                Arista has not proven by clear and
                                                conducted under authority of title VII of the           alleges violations of section 337 of the              convincing evidence that Cisco’s patent
                                                Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published            Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19                    claims are barred by equitable estoppel,
                                                pursuant to section 207.62 of the                       U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation,             waiver, implied license, laches, unclean
                                                Commission’s rules.                                                                                           hands, or patent misuse.
                                                                                                        importation, and sale within the United
                                                  By order of the Commission.                           States after importation of certain                      The Final ID finds that Cisco has
                                                  Issued: March 2, 2017.                                network devices, related software and                 satisfied the economic prong of the
                                                Lisa R. Barton,                                         components thereof by reason of                       domestic industry requirement for all of
                                                Secretary to the Commission.                            infringement of certain claims of U.S.                the patents-in-suit pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–04372 Filed 3–6–17; 8:45 am]              Patent Nos. 7,023,853; 6,377,577;                     337(A), (B), and (C). The Final ID finds,
                                                                                                        7,460,492; 7,061,875; 7,224,668; and                  however, that Cisco has failed to satisfy
                                                BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                        8,051,211. The Complaint further                      the technical prong of the domestic
                                                                                                        alleges the existence of a domestic                   industry requirement with respect to the
                                                INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                     industry. The Commission’s Notice of                  ’875, ’492, and ’211 patents. The Final
                                                COMMISSION                                              Investigation named Arista Networks,                  ID finds that Cisco has satisfied the
                                                                                                        Inc. of Santa Clara, California (‘‘Arista’’)          technical prong with respect to the ’577,
                                                [Investigation No. 337–TA–945]                          as respondent. The Office of Unfair                   ’853, and ’668 patents.
                                                                                                        Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also                The Final ID also contains the ALJ’s
                                                Certain Network Devices, Related                                                                              recommended determination on remedy
                                                                                                        named as a party to the investigation.
                                                Software and Components Thereof (II);                                                                         and bonding. The ALJ recommended
                                                                                                        The Commission previously terminated
                                                Commission Decision To Review in                                                                              that the appropriate remedy is a limited
                                                                                                        the investigation in part as to certain
                                                Part a Final Initial Determination                                                                            exclusion order with a certification
                                                                                                        claims of the asserted patents. Order No.
                                                Finding a Violation of Section 337;                                                                           provision and a cease and desist order
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                        38 (Oct. 27, 2015), unreviewed Notice
                                                Request for Written Submissions                                                                               against Arista. The ALJ recommended
                                                                                                        (Nov. 18, 2015); Order No. 47 (Nov. 9,
                                                AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                        2015), unreviewed Notice (Dec. 1, 2015).              the imposition of a bond of 5% during
                                                Commission.                                                On December 9, 2016, the ALJ issued                the period of Presidential review.
                                                ACTION: Notice.                                         her Final ID, finding a violation of                     On December 29, 2016, Cisco, Arista,
                                                                                                        section 337 with respect to claims 1, 7,              and OUII each filed petitions for review
                                                SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that                  9, 10, and 15 of the ’577 patent; and                 of various aspects of the Final ID. As
                                                the U.S. International Trade                            claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 18, 56, and          described below, some of the issues


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:01 Mar 06, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00063   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM   07MRN1



Document Created: 2018-02-01 14:48:48
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 14:48:48
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesEffective Date: March 1, 2017.
ContactMichael Szustakowski ((202) 205-3169), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FR Citation82 FR 12843 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR