82 FR 13432 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 47 (March 13, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 47 (March 13, 2017)
| Page Range | 13432-13433 | |
| FR Document | 2017-04824 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 47 (Monday, March 13, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 13432-13433] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-04824] [[Page 13432]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On September 2, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the third administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea. The review covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung), Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), Iljin, Iljin Electric Co., Ltd. (Iljin Electric), and LSIS Co., Ltd. (LSIS). Iljin, Iljin Electric and LSIS, were not selected for individual examination. The period of review is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, these final results differ from the preliminary results of review. For the final weighted-average dumping margins, see the ``Final Results of Review'' section below. DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury (Hyosung) or Moses Song (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 0195 or (202) 482-5041, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 2, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since the Department published these results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014- 2015, 81 FR 60672 (September 2, 2016) (Preliminary Results). \2\ See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2014-2015'', dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers (LPTs) having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080, and 8504.90.9540. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Appendix I. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties is attached to this notice as Appendix II. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our review of the record and comments received from interested parties, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for Hyosung and Hyundai. For Hyosung, the Department has relied on partial facts available under section 776(a)(1) of the Act with respect to adjustments to the cost of manufacturing and U.S. gross unit price for certain sales. In addition, the Department has relied on partial adverse facts available under sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act with respect to ocean freight expenses for certain sales made by Hyosung. Furthermore, pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, the Department has relied upon total facts otherwise available, with adverse inferences, for Hyundai's dumping margin. For a discussion of these changes, see the ``Margin Calculations'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. As a result of these changes, the weighted- average dumping margin also changes for the three companies not selected for individual examination. Final Results of the Review The final weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Manufacturer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyosung Corporation......................................... 2.99 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd........................... 60.81 Iljin Electric Co., Ltd..................................... 2.99 Iljin....................................................... 2.99 LSIS Co., Ltd............................................... 2.99 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\3\ For any individually examined respondents whose weighted- average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer- specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), the Department will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In these final results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we calculated importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating [[Page 13433]] the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)- specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we will apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer's/customer's entries during the review period. We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 22.00 percent, the all- others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\4\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the period of review. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties did occur and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: March 6, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I--Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers LPTs having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies consisting of the active part and any other parts attached to, imported with or invoiced with the active parts of LPTs. The ``active part'' of the transformer consists of one or more of the following when attached to or otherwise assembled with one another: The steel core or shell, the windings, electrical insulation between the windings, the mechanical frame for an LPT. The product definition encompasses all such LPTs regardless of name designation, including but not limited to step-up transformers, step-down transformers, autotransformers, interconnection transformers, voltage regulator transformers, rectifier transformers, and power rectifier transformers. The LPTs subject to this order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Margin Calculation VI. Application of Total Facts Available with Regard to Hyundai VII. Selection of Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Rate VIII. Rate for Unexamined Respondents IX. Discussion of the Issues A. Hyundai-Specific Issues Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available Comment 2: Corrections to the Draft Liquidation Instructions Comment 3: Moot Arguments B. Hyosung-Specific Issues Comment 4: The Department's Application of Expense Revenue Caps Comment 5: Should the Department Continue to Apply Expense Revenue Caps, It Should Correct Hyosung's U.S. Inland Freight Cap Comment 6: The Department Should Grant Hyosung a Commission Offset Comment 7: The Department Should Correct Certain Clerical Errors in its Preliminary Results Comment 8: The Department Should Not Conduct a Differential Pricing Analysis in the Final Results Comment 9: Hyosung's Allocations for Costs and Prices of Spare Parts and Accessories Are Not Reasonable and Should Be Rejected Comment 10: Hyosung Misreported the Physical Characteristics for Certain Sales Comment 11: Hyosung Failed to Reconcile Its Reported U.S. Sales Data to Its Normal Books and Records Comment 12: Hyosung's Reported Increases to U.S. Prices Are Not Supported by Sales Documentation Generated in Its Normal Course of Business 1. Freight and Sales Revenues Not Supported by the Record 2. Hyosung's Commercial Invoices Are Not Reliable 3. Hyosung's Invoices Show Incorrect Amounts 4. Hyosung's Reported Warehouse Expenses and Storage Revenues Are Not Correct 5. Hyosung's Reconciled U.S. Sales Database Is Reliable Comment 13: The Department Should Not Accept Hyosung's Understated Ocean Freight Expenses for U.S. Sales Comment 14: The Department Must Not Accept Hyosung's Reported Cost of Manufacture Data Comment 15: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available Is Not Warranted for The Final Results Comment 16: If The Department Relies On Any Portion of Hyosung's Data Then Additional Corrections Should Be Made in the Final Results Comment 17: Date of Sale X. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-04824 Filed 3-10-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![13432 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 47 / Monday, March 13, 2017 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Scope of the Order inferences, for Hyundai’s dumping
The scope of this order covers large margin. For a discussion of these
International Trade Administration liquid dielectric power transformers changes, see the ‘‘Margin Calculations’’
(LPTs) having a top power handling section of the Issues and Decision
[A–580–867]
capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 Memorandum. As a result of these
Large Power Transformers From the kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), changes, the weighted-average dumping
Republic of Korea: Final Results of whether assembled or unassembled, margin also changes for the three
Antidumping Duty Administrative complete or incomplete. The companies not selected for individual
Review; 2014–2015 merchandise subject to the order is examination.
currently classified in the Harmonized Final Results of the Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Tariff Schedule of the United States at
International Trade Administration, subheadings 8504.23.0040, The final weighted-average dumping
Department of Commerce. 8504.23.0080, and 8504.90.9540. For a margins are as follows:
SUMMARY: On September 2, 2016, the complete description of the scope of the
Department of Commerce (the Weighted-
order, see Appendix I. average
Department) published in the Federal Manufacturer/exporter dumping
Register the preliminary results of the Analysis of Comments Received
margin
third administrative review of the All issues raised in the case and (percent)
antidumping duty order on large power rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in Hyosung Corporation .................. 2.99
transformers from the Republic of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.,
Korea. The review covers five Ltd ........................................... 60.81
producers/exporters of the subject A list of the issues raised by parties is Iljin Electric Co., Ltd ................... 2.99
merchandise, Hyosung Corporation attached to this notice as Appendix II. Iljin .............................................. 2.99
(Hyosung), Hyundai Heavy Industries The Issues and Decision Memorandum LSIS Co., Ltd .............................. 2.99
Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), Iljin, Iljin Electric is a public document and is on file
Co., Ltd. (Iljin Electric), and LSIS Co., electronically via Enforcement and Disclosure
Ltd. (LSIS). Iljin, Iljin Electric and LSIS, Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized We will disclose the calculations
were not selected for individual
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). performed to parties in this proceeding
examination. The period of review is
ACCESS is available to registered users within five days of the date of
August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015.
at https://access.trade.gov and it is publication of this notice, in accordance
As a result of our analysis of the
available to all parties in the Central with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
comments and information received,
these final results differ from the Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Duty Assessment
preliminary results of review. For the Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the The Department shall determine and
final weighted-average dumping U.S. Customs and Border Protection
margins, see the ‘‘Final Results of Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at http:// (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties
Review’’ section below. on all appropriate entries.3 For any
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2017. individually examined respondents
The signed and electronic versions of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John the Issues and Decision Memorandum whose weighted-average dumping
Drury (Hyosung) or Moses Song are identical in content. margin is above de minimis, we
(Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office calculated importer-specific ad valorem
VI, Enforcement and Compliance, Changes Since the Preliminary Results duty assessment rates based on the ratio
International Trade Administration, Based on our review of the record and of the total amount of dumping
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 comments received from interested calculated for the importer’s examined
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, parties, we made certain changes to the sales to the total entered value of those
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195 or margin calculations for Hyosung and same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
(202) 482–5041, respectively. Hyundai. For Hyosung, the Department 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: has relied on partial facts available results of this administrative review, if
under section 776(a)(1) of the Act with any importer-specific assessment rates
Background respect to adjustments to the cost of calculated in the final results are above
On September 2, 2016, the manufacturing and U.S. gross unit price de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent),
Department published the Preliminary for certain sales. In addition, the the Department will issue instructions
Results.1 A summary of the events that Department has relied on partial adverse directly to CBP to assess antidumping
occurred since the Department facts available under sections 776(a) and duties on appropriate entries.
published these results, as well as a full (b) of the Act with respect to ocean To determine whether the duty
discussion of the issues raised by parties freight expenses for certain sales made assessment rates covering the period
for this final determination, may be by Hyosung. Furthermore, pursuant to were de minimis, in accordance with
found in the Issues and Decision section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, the the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted Department has relied upon total facts 351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we
by this notice.2 otherwise available, with adverse calculated importer (or customer)-
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
specific ad valorem rates by aggregating
1 See Large Power Transformers from the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Issues 3 In these final results, the Department applied
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
2015, 81 FR 60672 (September 2, 2016) (Preliminary the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Results). Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
2 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Republic of Korea; 2014–2015’’, dated concurrently Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and with this notice (Issues and Decision Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Memorandum). (February 14, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Mar 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_13479/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 47 / Monday, March 13, 2017 / Notices 13433
the amount of dumping calculated for that reimbursement of antidumping V. Margin Calculation
all U.S. sales to that importer or and/or countervailing duties did occur VI. Application of Total Facts Available with
customer and dividing this amount by and the subsequent assessment of Regard to Hyundai
the total entered value of the sales to doubled antidumping duties. VII. Selection of Adverse Facts Available
that importer (or customer). Where an (AFA) Rate
Administrative Protective Order VIII. Rate for Unexamined Respondents
importer (or customer)-specific ad
valorem rate is greater than de minimis, This notice also serves as a reminder IX. Discussion of the Issues
and the respondent has reported reliable to parties subject to administrative A. Hyundai-Specific Issues
entered values, we will apply the protective orders (APO) of their Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse
assessment rate to the entered value of responsibility concerning the return or Facts Available
destruction of proprietary information Comment 2: Corrections to the Draft
the importer’s/customer’s entries during
disclosed under APO in accordance Liquidation Instructions
the review period.
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Comment 3: Moot Arguments
We intend to issue assessment
continues to govern business B. Hyosung-Specific Issues
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
proprietary information in this segment Comment 4: The Department’s Application
after publication of the final results of
of the proceeding. Timely written of Expense Revenue Caps
this review.
notification of the return/destruction of Comment 5: Should the Department
Cash Deposit Requirements APO materials, or conversion to judicial Continue to Apply Expense Revenue
Caps, It Should Correct Hyosung’s U.S.
The following cash deposit protective order, is hereby requested.
Inland Freight Cap
requirements will be effective upon Failure to comply with the regulations
Comment 6: The Department Should Grant
publication of this notice for all and the terms of an APO is a
Hyosung a Commission Offset
shipments of subject merchandise sanctionable violation. Comment 7: The Department Should
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, We are issuing and publishing this
Correct Certain Clerical Errors in its
for consumption on or after the notice in accordance with sections Preliminary Results
publication of these final results, as 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Comment 8: The Department Should Not
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: CFR 351.213(h). Conduct a Differential Pricing Analysis
(1) The cash deposit rate for Dated: March 6, 2017. in the Final Results
respondents noted above will be the rate Ronald K. Lorentzen, Comment 9: Hyosung’s Allocations for
established in the final results of this Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Costs and Prices of Spare Parts and
administrative review; (2) for and Compliance. Accessories Are Not Reasonable and
merchandise exported by manufacturers Should Be Rejected
or exporters not covered in this Appendix I—Scope of the Order Comment 10: Hyosung Misreported the
administrative review but covered in a The scope of this order covers LPTs having Physical Characteristics for Certain Sales
prior segment of the proceeding, the a top power handling capacity greater than or Comment 11: Hyosung Failed to Reconcile
cash deposit rate will continue to be the equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 Its Reported U.S. Sales Data to Its
company specific rate published for the megavolt amperes), whether assembled or Normal Books and Records
most recently completed segment of this unassembled, complete or incomplete. Comment 12: Hyosung’s Reported
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies Increases to U.S. Prices Are Not
consisting of the active part and any other Supported by Sales Documentation
firm covered in this review, a prior parts attached to, imported with or invoiced
review, or the original investigation, but Generated in Its Normal Course of
with the active parts of LPTs. The ‘‘active
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit part’’ of the transformer consists of one or Business
rate will be the rate established for the more of the following when attached to or 1. Freight and Sales Revenues Not
most recently completed segment of this otherwise assembled with one another: The Supported by the Record
proceeding for the manufacturer of the steel core or shell, the windings, electrical 2. Hyosung’s Commercial Invoices Are Not
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash insulation between the windings, the Reliable
deposit rate for all other manufacturers mechanical frame for an LPT. 3. Hyosung’s Invoices Show Incorrect
The product definition encompasses all Amounts
or exporters will continue to be 22.00 such LPTs regardless of name designation,
percent, the all-others rate established 4. Hyosung’s Reported Warehouse
including but not limited to step-up Expenses and Storage Revenues Are Not
in the antidumping investigation.4 transformers, step-down transformers, Correct
These cash deposit requirements, when autotransformers, interconnection
5. Hyosung’s Reconciled U.S. Sales
imposed, shall remain in effect until transformers, voltage regulator transformers,
rectifier transformers, and power rectifier Database Is Reliable
further notice.
transformers. Comment 13: The Department Should Not
Notification to Importers Regarding the The LPTs subject to this order are currently Accept Hyosung’s Understated Ocean
Reimbursement of Duties classifiable under subheadings 8504.23.0040, Freight Expenses for U.S. Sales
8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540 of the Comment 14: The Department Must Not
This notice also serves as a final
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United Accept Hyosung’s Reported Cost of
reminder to importers of their States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS Manufacture Data
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) subheadings are provided for convenience Comment 15: Application of Total Adverse
to file a certificate regarding the and customs purposes, the written Facts Available Is Not Warranted for The
reimbursement of antidumping and/or description of the scope of this order is Final Results
countervailing duties prior to dispositive.
Comment 16: If The Department Relies On
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
liquidation of the relevant entries Any Portion of Hyosung’s Data Then
Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
during the period of review. Failure to Additional Corrections Should Be Made
in the Final Issues and Decision
comply with this requirement could in the Final Results
Memorandum
result in the Department’s presumption Comment 17: Date of Sale
I. Summary X. Recommendation
4 SeeLarge Power Transformers from the II. List of Issues
III. Background [FR Doc. 2017–04824 Filed 3–10–17; 8:45 am]
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR
53177 (August 31, 2012). IV. Scope of the Order BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Mar 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_13479/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-01 14:57:42
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 14:57:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: March 13, 2017. | |
| Contact | John Drury (Hyosung) or Moses Song (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 0195 or (202) 482-5041, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 13432 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR