82 FR 13965 - Regulated Navigation Areas; Escorted Submarines Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 50 (March 16, 2017)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 50 (March 16, 2017)
| Page Range | 13965-13968 | |
| FR Document | 2017-05229 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 50 (Thursday, March 16, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 13965-13968] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-05229] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2016-0032] RIN 1625-AA11 Regulated Navigation Areas; Escorted Submarines Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing regulated navigation areas (RNA) covering the St. Marys Entrance Channel, portions of the Cumberland Sound, and the Atlantic Ocean that will be in effect whenever any Navy submarine (foreign or domestic) is escorted by the Coast Guard and operating within the jurisdictional waters of the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone. These RNAs [[Page 13966]] are necessary to help ensure the safety and security of submarines, their Coast Guard escorts, and the public. The RNAs will do so by requiring all persons and vessels located within an RNA to follow lawful orders and/or directions given to them by Coast Guard designated representatives. Additionally, these RNAs will supersede the current temporary safety/security zone for Cumberland Sound, Georgia and St. Marys River Entrance Channel. DATES: This rule is effective April 17, 2017. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG- 2016-0032 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville, Chief of Waterways Management, telephone (904) 714-7616, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History Navy submarines frequently operate within the Cumberland Sound and the St. Marys Entrance Channel. When transiting these areas, the submarines and the vessels towing them are severely restricted in their ability to maneuver or deviate course. Due to the safety and security concerns involved with submarine operations near shore in restricted waters, the Coast Guard provides submarine escorts when they are operating in those areas and offshore in the Atlantic Ocean. Because the existing regulatory options the Coast Guard uses to safeguard the movement of submarines, their Coast Guard escorts, and the public are insufficient, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on June 13, 2016, titled ``Regulated Navigation Areas; Escorted Submarines Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone'' (81 FR 38119). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action. During the comment period that ended July 13, 2016, we received no public comments and two interagency comments. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The Coast Guard has determined that RNAs are necessary to allow designated Coast Guard representatives adequate time to effectively order and/or direct persons and vessels operating within a RNA to stop, move, change orientation, or take other action as needed to ensure safety and/or security. The ability to order and/or direct persons and vessels will help avoid unnecessary and potentially dangerous close quarters contact between Coast Guard escorts and the maritime public within Cumberland Sound, the St. Marys Entrance Channel, and offshore in the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, it will give Coast Guard escorts an additional tool for determining the intention of vessels that are operating in close vicinity to an escorted submarine. The RNAs will mitigate the risks associated with these issues, and ensure the safety and security of the submarines, their Coast Guard escorts, and the maritime public. IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule As noted above, we received no public comments on the NPRM published on June 13, 2016. To better define the northern extent of the RNA, we have incorporated one change to the rule based on an interagency comment. The change includes adding the words ``the southern tip of'' to the Crab Island position. This rule establishes a regulated area encompassing all waters within one (1) nautical mile of the charted center of the navigation channel from the southern tip of Crab Island in the Cumberland Sound, Georgia, to the St. Marys Entrance Channel and its approach extending eastward to lighted buoy ``STM.'' This portion of the regulation would allow Coast Guard vessels to direct waterway traffic in any portion of this confined channel when a submarine is being escorted. Additionally, a regulated area will encompass waters within one (1) nautical mile of any Navy submarine while it is transiting territorial seas within the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone. All persons and vessels located within the RNA are required to follow lawful orders and/or directions given to them by designated Coast Guard representatives. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. The Coast Guard made this determination based on the fact that (1) the RNAs are only enforced for the short periods of time when submarines are operating in the St. Marys Entrance Channel, portions of the Cumberland Sound, and Atlantic Ocean and escorted by the Coast Guard or anytime a submarine is operating and escorted by the Coast Guard within the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone territorial seas and (2) vessels may freely operate within the RNAs to the extent permitted by other law or regulation unless given a lawful order and/or direction by designated Coast Guard representatives. The Coast Guard has determined that this rule, superseding the temporary safety/security zone implemented under 33 CFR 165.731(b), does not constitute a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 based on the size and location of the security zone. The permanent security zone currently implemented under 33 CFR 165.731(a) remains in effect and covers approximately five square nautical miles of a sparsely populated section of Cumberland Sound and tributaries where few recreational or commercial vessels transit. Vessels transiting this area of Cumberland Sound can transit around the security zone. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small [[Page 13967]] businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard did not receive any comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the RNA may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment of RNAs and an amendment to a safety/ security zone covering the St. Marys Entrance Channel, portions of the Cumberland Sound, and Atlantic Ocean, that will be enforced whenever any Navy submarine (foreign or domestic) is being escorted by the Coast Guard and operating within the jurisdictional waters of the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Revise Sec. [thinsp]165.731 to read as follows: Sec. [thinsp]165.731 Security Zone: Cumberland Sound, Georgia. (a) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville, Florida, in the enforcement of the regulated areas. (b) Location. A permanent security zone is established within the following coordinates, the area enclosed by a line starting at 30[deg]44'55'' N., 081[deg]29'39'' W.; thence to 30[deg]44'55'' N., 081[deg]29'18'' W.; thence to 30[deg]46'35'' N., 081[deg]29'18'' W.; thence to 30[deg]47'02'' N., 081[deg]29'34'' W.; thence to 30[deg]47'21'' N., 081[deg]29'39'' W.; thence to 30[deg]48'00'' N., 081[deg]29'42'' W.; thence to 30[deg]49'07'' N., 081[deg]29'56'' W.; thence to 30[deg]49'55'' N., 081[deg]30'35'' W.; thence to 30[deg]50'15'' N., 081[deg]31'08'' W.; thence to 30[deg]50'14'' N., 081[deg]31'30'' W.; thence to 30[deg]49'58'' N., 081[deg]31'45'' W.; thence to 30[deg]49'58'' N., 081[deg]32'03'' W.; thence to 30[deg]50'12'' N., 081[deg]32'17'' W.; thence following the land based perimeter boundary to the point of origin. (c) Regulations. (1) No person or vessel may enter or remain within the security zone without the permission of the COTP Jacksonville or designated representative. (2) All persons and vessels authorized to enter the security zone shall immediately obey any direction or order of the COTP Jacksonville or designated representative. (3) This regulation does not apply to persons or vessels operating under the authority of the United States Navy or to authorized law enforcement agencies. [[Page 13968]] 0 3. Add Sec. [thinsp]165.732 to read as follows: Sec. [thinsp]165.732 Escorted Submarines Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone. (a) Location. The following areas are regulated navigation areas (RNA) whenever any Navy submarine (foreign or domestic) is being escorted by the Coast Guard within the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone territorial seas: (1) All waters within 1 nautical mile of any Navy submarine operating within the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone territorial seas; and (2) All waters within 1 nautical mile of the charted center of the navigation channel from the southern tip of Crab Island in the Cumberland Sound, Georgia, to the St. Marys Entrance Channel and its approach extending eastward to lighted buoy ``STM.'' (b) Regulations. All persons and vessels located within a RNA created by paragraph (a) shall follow all lawful orders and/or directions given to them by designated Coast Guard representatives. 33 CFR 165, subpart B, contains additional provisions applicable to the RNA created in paragraph (a) of this section. (c) Notification. The Coast Guard escort will attempt, when necessary and practicable, to notify any persons or vessels inside or approaching the vicinity of a RNA created in paragraph (a) of this section of its existence via VHF Channel 16 and/or any other means reasonably available. Dated: March 10, 2017. S.A. Buschman, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2017-05229 Filed 3-15-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 50 / Thursday, March 16, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 13965
b. ‘‘Hazardous/severe-major’’ failure Systems with failures that may result the requirements for failure conditions
conditions can include events that are in ‘‘hazardous/severe-major’’ effects classified as ‘‘hazardous/severe-major’’
manageable by the crew by the use of must be shown to be extremely remote may be shown by flight-testing in
proper procedures, which, if not must develop software to the RTCA combination with analysis and
implemented correctly or in a timely Document DO–178B, Software simulation, and the appropriate testing
manner, may result in a catastrophic Considerations in Airborne Systems and to validate the analysis. Flight tests may
event. Equipment Certification, Level B be limited for ‘‘hazardous/severe-major’’
5. Catastrophic. Failure conditions software design assurance level and failure conditions and effects due to
result in multiple fatalities to occupants, must develop complex hardware to the safety considerations. Compliance with
fatalities or incapacitation to the flight Radio Technical Commission for the requirements for failure conditions
crew, or result in loss of the rotorcraft. Aeronautics (RTCA) Document DO–254, classified as ‘‘catastrophic’’ may be
The potential that a failure results in a Design Assurance Guidance for shown by analysis and appropriate
condition characterized as catastrophic Airborne Electronic Hardware, Level B testing in combination with simulation
should be extremely improbable with hardware design assurance level. to validate the analysis. Very limited
probability of occurrence 1 × 10¥9 Systems with failures that may result flight tests in combination with
failures/flight hour or less. in ‘‘catastrophic’’ effects must be shown simulation are used as a part of a
to be extremely improbable, and showing of compliance for
Requirements develop software to the RTCA ‘‘catastrophic’’ failure conditions. Flight
Helitrak must comply with the Document DO–178B, Software tests are performed only in
existing requirements of § 27.1309 for Considerations in Airborne Systems and circumstances that use operational
all applicable design and operational Equipment Certification, Level A design variations, or extrapolations from other
aspects of the Helitrak AP with the assurance level and must develop flight performance aspects to address
failure condition categories of ‘‘no complex hardware to the Radio flight safety.
effect’’ and ‘‘minor,’’ and for non- Technical Commission for Aeronautics These special conditions require that
complex systems whose failure (RTCA) Document DO–254, Design the Helitrak AP system installed on a
condition category is classified as Assurance Guidance for Airborne Robinson Model R22 BETA helicopter,
‘‘major.’’ Helitrak must comply with the Electronic Hardware, Level A hardware Type Certificate No. H10WE, meet these
requirements of these special conditions design assurance level. requirements to adequately address the
for all applicable design and operational System Design Environmental failure effects identified by the FHA,
aspects of the Helitrak AP with the Requirements and subsequently verified by the SSA,
failure condition categories of within the defined design system
The AP system equipment must be
‘‘catastrophic’’ and ‘‘hazardous severe/ integrity requirements.
qualified to the appropriate
major,’’ and for complex systems whose environmental level per RTCA Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 10,
failure condition category is classified Document DO–160F, Environmental 2017.
as ‘‘major.’’ A complex system is a Conditions and Test Procedures for Lance Gant,
system whose operations, failure Airborne Equipment, for all relevant Manager Rotorcraft Standard Staff, Aircraft
conditions, or failure effects are difficult aspects. This is to show that the AP Certification Service.
to comprehend without the aid of system performs its intended function [FR Doc. 2017–05268 Filed 3–15–17; 8:45 am]
analytical methods (for example, FTA, under any foreseeable operating BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Failure Modes and Effect Analysis, condition, including the expected
FHA). environment in which the AP is
System Design Integrity Requirements intended to operate. Some of the main DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
considerations for environmental SECURITY
Each of the failure condition concerns are installation locations and
categories defined in these special the resulting exposure to environmental Coast Guard
conditions relate to the corresponding conditions for the AP system
aircraft system integrity requirements. equipment, including considerations for 33 CFR Part 165
The system design integrity other equipment that may be affected [Docket Number USCG–2016–0032]
requirements for the Helitrak AP, as environmentally by the AP equipment
they relate to the allowed probability of installation. The level of environmental RIN 1625–AA11
occurrence for each failure condition qualification must be related to the
category and the proposed software Regulated Navigation Areas; Escorted
severity of the considered failure
design assurance level, are as follows: Submarines Sector Jacksonville
conditions and effects on the rotorcraft.
Systems with failures that may result Captain of the Port Zone
in a ‘‘major’’ effect must be shown to be Test & Analysis Requirements
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
remote and develop software to the Compliance with the requirements of ACTION: Final rule.
Radio Technical Commission for these special conditions may be shown
Aeronautics (RTCA) Document DO– by a variety of methods, which typically SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
178B, Software Considerations in consist of analysis, flight tests, ground establishing regulated navigation areas
Airborne Systems and Equipment tests, and simulation, at a minimum. (RNA) covering the St. Marys Entrance
Certification, Level C software design Compliance methodology is related to Channel, portions of the Cumberland
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
assurance level and must develop the associated failure condition Sound, and the Atlantic Ocean that will
complex hardware to the Radio category. If the AP is a complex system, be in effect whenever any Navy
Technical Commission for Aeronautics compliance with the requirements for submarine (foreign or domestic) is
(RTCA) Document DO–254, Design failure conditions classified as ‘‘major’’ escorted by the Coast Guard and
Assurance Guidance for Airborne may be shown by analysis, in operating within the jurisdictional
Electronic Hardware, Level C hardware combination with appropriate testing, to waters of the Sector Jacksonville
design assurance level. validate the analysis. Compliance with Captain of the Port Zone. These RNAs
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:18 Mar 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16MRR1.SGM 16MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_14015/page/1.svg)
![13968 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 50 / Thursday, March 16, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
■ 3. Add § 165.732 to read as follows: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Agency, Office of Land and Emergency
AGENCY Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
§ 165.732 Escorted Submarines Sector NW. (Mail Code 5104A), Washington,
Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone. 40 CFR Part 68 DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
(a) Location. The following areas are 564–7987; email address:
[EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725; FRL–9959–57–
regulated navigation areas (RNA) OLEM] franklin.kathy@epa.gov.
whenever any Navy submarine (foreign Electronic copies of this document
or domestic) is being escorted by the RIN 2050–AG82 and related news releases are available
on EPA’s Web site at http://
Coast Guard within the Sector Accidental Release Prevention www.epa.gov/rmp. Copies of this final
Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone Requirements: Risk Management rule are also available at http://
territorial seas: Programs Under the Clean Air Act; www.regulations.gov.
(1) All waters within 1 nautical mile Further Delay of Effective Date
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of any Navy submarine operating within
AGENCY: Environmental Protection I. Background
the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the
Agency (EPA).
Port Zone territorial seas; and On January 13, 2017, the EPA (‘‘we’’)
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective
(2) All waters within 1 nautical mile issued a final rule amending 40 CFR
date. part 68, the chemical accident
of the charted center of the navigation
channel from the southern tip of Crab SUMMARY: By a letter dated March 13, prevention provisions under section
Island in the Cumberland Sound, 2017, the Administrator announced the 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) ((42
Georgia, to the St. Marys Entrance convening of a proceeding for U.S.C. 7412(r)). The amendments
reconsideration of the final rule that addressed various aspects of risk
Channel and its approach extending
amends the chemical accident management programs, including
eastward to lighted buoy ‘‘STM.’’
prevention provisions addressing Risk prevention programs at stationary
(b) Regulations. All persons and sources, emergency response
Management Programs under the Clean
vessels located within a RNA created by preparedness requirements, information
Air Act published in the Federal
paragraph (a) shall follow all lawful Register on January 13, 2017. The availability, and various other changes
orders and/or directions given to them effective date of these regulations had to streamline, clarify, and otherwise
by designated Coast Guard been March 21, 2017. By this action, the technically correct the underlying rules.
representatives. 33 CFR 165, subpart B, EPA is administratively staying and Collectively, this rulemaking is known
contains additional provisions delaying the effective date of this rule as the ‘‘Risk Management Program
applicable to the RNA created in for 90 days. Thus, the January 13, 2017 Amendments.’’ For further information
paragraph (a) of this section. rule will become effective on June 19, on the Risk Management Program
2017. Amendments, see 82 FR 4594 (January
(c) Notification. The Coast Guard
13, 2017).
escort will attempt, when necessary and DATES: The effective date of the rule On January 26, 2017, the EPA
practicable, to notify any persons or amending 40 CFR part 68 published at published a final rule extending the
vessels inside or approaching the 82 FR 4594 (January 13, 2017), as effective date of the Risk Management
vicinity of a RNA created in paragraph delayed at 82 FR 8499 (January 26, Program Amendments from March 14,
(a) of this section of its existence via 2017) is further delayed to June 19, 2017, to March 21, 2017, see 82 FR
VHF Channel 16 and/or any other 2017. 8499. This revision to the effective date
means reasonably available. of the Risk Management Program
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
Dated: March 10, 2017. docket for the rule amending 40 CFR Amendments was part of an EPA final
S.A. Buschman, part 68 under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– rule implementing a memorandum
OEM–2015–0725. All documents in the dated January 20, 2017, from the
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
docket are listed on the http:// Assistant to the President and Chief of
Seventh Coast Guard District.
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although Staff, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Freeze
[FR Doc. 2017–05229 Filed 3–15–17; 8:45 am]
listed in the index, some information is Pending Review.’’ This memorandum
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential directed the heads of agencies to extend
Business Information (CBI) or other until 60 days after the date of its
information whose disclosure is issuance the effective date of rules that
restricted by statute. Certain other were published prior to January 20,
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 2017 but which had not yet become
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be effective.
Office of Postsecondary Education In a letter dated February 28, 2017, a
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket group known as the ‘‘RMP Coalition,’’ 1
34 CFR Part 674 submitted a petition for reconsideration
materials are available electronically
through http://www.regulations.gov. of the Risk Management Program
Federal Perkins Loan Program Amendments (‘‘RMP Coalition
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
CFR Correction Petition’’) as provided for in CAA
James Belke, United States section 307(d)(7)(B) (42 U.S.C.
Environmental Protection Agency,
In Title 34 of the Code of Federal
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Office of Land and Emergency
Regulations, Parts 400 to 679, revised as 1 The RMP Coalition is comprised of the
Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. American Chemistry Council, the American Forest
of July 1, 2016, on page 698, in § 674.17, NW. (Mail Code 5104A), Washington, & Paper Association, the American Fuel &
in the introductory text of paragraph (a), DC 20460; telephone number: (202) Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American
the words ‘‘one of’’ are removed. 564–8023; email address: belke.jim@ Petroleum Institute, the Chamber of Commerce of
the United States of America, the National
[FR Doc. 2017–05299 Filed 3–15–17; 8:45 am] epa.gov, or: Kathy Franklin, United Association of Manufacturers, and the Utility Air
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D States Environmental Protection Regulatory Group.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:18 Mar 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16MRR1.SGM 16MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_14015/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-03-16 02:18:49
Document Modified: 2017-03-16 02:18:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective April 17, 2017. | |
| Contact | If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville, Chief of Waterways Management, telephone (904) 714-7616, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 13965 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA11 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR