82 FR 15476 - Safety Zone; Tall Ships Charleston, Cooper River, Charleston, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 59 (March 29, 2017)

Page Range		15476-15478
FR Document		2017-06188

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone on the waters of the Cooper River in Charleston, South Carolina. This proposed safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of participant vessels, and the general public during Tall Ships Charleston, an event allowing for public tours of tall ships (large sailing vessels) from various countries while at the docks of Veterans Terminal on the Cooper River in Charleston, South Carolina. This rule is intended to prohibit persons and vessels from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 59 (Wednesday, March 29, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 29, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15476-15478]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0121]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Tall Ships Charleston, Cooper River, Charleston, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone 
on the waters of the Cooper River in Charleston, South Carolina. This 
proposed safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of 
participant vessels, and the general public during Tall Ships 
Charleston, an event allowing for public tours of tall ships (large 
sailing vessels) from various countries while at the docks of Veterans 
Terminal on the Cooper River in Charleston, South Carolina. This rule 
is intended to prohibit persons and vessels from entering, transiting 
through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before April 28, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0121 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander John Downing, 
Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; 
telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On December 1, 2016, Tall Ships Charleston notified the Coast Guard 
that they will be sponsoring the Tall Ships Charleston event on May 18, 
2017 through May 21, 2017. Approximately 10,000 spectators are 
anticipated to participate in the public tours of tall ships (large 
sailing vessels) at the Veterans Terminal on the Cooper River in 
Charleston, South Carolina. The Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP) 
has determined that the potential hazards associated with public tours 
of these tall ships constitute a safety concern for anyone within the 
proposed safety zone. The purpose of the rule is to ensure the safety 
of life on the navigable waters of the Cooper River during the 
scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under 
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone on 
the waters of the Cooper River in Charleston, South Carolina, during 
Tall Ships Charleston from May 18 through May 21, 2017. The duration of 
the safety zone is intended to ensure the safety of life on the 
navigable waters of the Cooper River at Veterans Terminal before, 
during, and after the schedule public touring event. No person or 
vessel would be permitted to enter, transit through, anchor in, or 
remain within the proposed safety zone without obtaining permission 
from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we 
are proposing appears at the end of this document. The Coast Guard will 
provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners, 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking.

[[Page 15477]]

Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and 
executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O.13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not 
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The economic impact of this rule is not significant for the 
following reasons: (1) Although persons and vessels may not enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone without 
authorization from the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative, they may operate in the surrounding area during the 
enforcement period; and (2) the Coast Guard will provide advance 
notification of the safety zone to the local maritime community by 
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, (5 U.S.C. 601-612), as 
amended requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-
profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are 
not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with 
populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    We have considered the impact of this proposed rule on small 
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which 
may be small entities: the owner or operators of vessels intending to 
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area 
during the enforcement period. For the reasons stated in section IV.A 
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety 
zone prohibiting vessel traffic from a limited area surrounding the 
Veterans Terminal on the waters of the Cooper River for a 3 day period. 
This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. We seek any comments 
or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://

[[Page 15478]]

www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.35T07-0121 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-0121   Safety Zone; Tall Ships Charleston, Charleston, 
SC.

    (a) Location. This rule establishes a temporary safety zone on 
certain waters of the Cooper River, Charleston, South Carolina. The 
temporary safety zone consists of navigable waters of the Cooper River 
which begin at the shoreline and extend 100 yards off of each pier 
located at Veterans Terminal.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and 
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated 
areas.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, 
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated 
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 
designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, or 
remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port 
Charleston by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated representative 
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization 
to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area is 
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization 
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston 
or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by 
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene 
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This proposed rule will be enforced from 
May 18, 2017 through May 21, 2017.

    Dated: March 23, 2017.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2017-06188 Filed 3-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

15476 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 29, 2017 / Proposed Rules

(d) Subject (i) Related Information Commander John Downing, Sector
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) For more information about this AD, Charleston Office of Waterways
Code 7250, Turbine Section. contact John Tallarovic, Aerospace Engineer, Management, Coast Guard; telephone
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, (843) 740–3184, email John.Z.Downing@
(e) Unsafe Condition 2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; uscg.mil.
This AD was prompted by in-service phone: 847–294–8180; fax: 847–294–7834;
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
turbine wheel blade failures that revealed the email: john.m.tallarovic@faa.gov.
need for changes to the inspections of certain Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on I. Table of Abbreviations
3rd-stage turbine wheels and removal from March 17, 2017. CFR Code of Federal Regulations
service of certain 4th-stage turbine wheels.
Thomas A. Boudreau, DHS Department of Homeland Security
We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller E.O. Executive order
the 3rd-stage and 4th-stage turbine wheel FR Federal Register
blades, damage to the engine, and damage to Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
the aircraft. [FR Doc. 2017–06174 Filed 3–28–17; 8:45 am] Pub. L. Public Law
(f) Compliance BILLING CODE 4910–13–P § Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Comply with this AD within the COTP Captain of the Port
compliance times specified, unless already
done. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
(1) Within 1,775 hours since last visual SECURITY Basis
inspection and fluorescent-penetrant
inspection (FPI) or before the next flight after Coast Guard On December 1, 2016, Tall Ships
the effective date of this AD, whichever Charleston notified the Coast Guard that
occurs later: 33 CFR Part 165 they will be sponsoring the Tall Ships
(i) Remove 3rd-stage turbine wheels, P/N Charleston event on May 18, 2017
23065818, and perform a visual inspection [Docket Number USCG–2017–0121] through May 21, 2017. Approximately
and an FPI on the removed turbine wheels RIN 1625–AA00 10,000 spectators are anticipated to
for cracks at the trailing edge of the turbine participate in the public tours of tall
blades, near the fillet at the rim. Safety Zone; Tall Ships Charleston, ships (large sailing vessels) at the
(ii) Thereafter, re-inspect the affected Cooper River, Charleston, SC Veterans Terminal on the Cooper River
turbine wheels every 1,775 hours since last in Charleston, South Carolina. The
inspection (HSLI). AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP)
(2) Within 2,025 hours after the effective
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. has determined that the potential
date of this AD:
(i) Remove 3rd-stage turbine wheels, P/N hazards associated with public tours of
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to these tall ships constitute a safety
RR30000236, and perform a visual inspection
and an FPI on the removed turbine wheels
establish a temporary safety zone on the concern for anyone within the proposed
for cracks at the trailing edge of the turbine waters of the Cooper River in safety zone. The purpose of the rule is
blades, near the fillet at the rim. Charleston, South Carolina. This to ensure the safety of life on the
(ii) Thereafter, re-inspect the turbine proposed safety zone is necessary to navigable waters of the Cooper River
wheels every 2,025 HSLI. provide for the safety of participant during the scheduled event. The Coast
(3) Any time the power turbine is vessels, and the general public during Guard proposes this rulemaking under
disassembled, perform a visual inspection Tall Ships Charleston, an event allowing authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
and an FPI on 3rd-stage turbine wheels, P/ for public tours of tall ships (large
N 23065818 or P/N RR30000236, for cracks sailing vessels) from various countries III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
at the trailing edge of the turbine blades, near while at the docks of Veterans Terminal The Coast Guard proposes to establish
the fillet at the rim.
(4) Do not return to service any turbine
on the Cooper River in Charleston, a temporary safety zone on the waters of
wheels found to have cracks. South Carolina. This rule is intended to the Cooper River in Charleston, South
(5) Within 1,775 HSLI, or at the next prohibit persons and vessels from Carolina, during Tall Ships Charleston
engine shop visit, whichever occurs later, entering, transiting through, anchoring from May 18 through May 21, 2017. The
remove 4th-stage turbine wheels, P/N in, or remaining within the safety zone duration of the safety zone is intended
23055944, from service. unless authorized by the Captain of the to ensure the safety of life on the
(6) Within 2,025 HSLI, or at the next Port Charleston or a designated navigable waters of the Cooper River at
engine shop visit, whichever occurs later, representative. We invite your Veterans Terminal before, during, and
remove 4th-stage turbine wheels, P/N comments on this proposed rulemaking. after the schedule public touring event.
RR30000240, from service. No person or vessel would be permitted
DATES: Comments and related material
(g) Definition must be received by the Coast Guard on to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
For the purpose of this AD, ‘‘engine shop or before April 28, 2017. remain within the proposed safety zone
visit’’ is the induction of an engine into the ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
without obtaining permission from the
shop for maintenance involving the identified by docket number USCG– COTP or a designated representative.
separation of pairs of major mating engine
2017–0121 using the Federal The regulatory text we are proposing
flanges, except that the separation of engine appears at the end of this document.
flanges solely for the purposes of
eRulemaking Portal at http://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public The Coast Guard will provide notice of
transportation without subsequent engine the safety zone by Local Notice to
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS

maintenance does not constitute an engine Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners,
shop visit.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
and on-scene designated
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
further instructions on submitting representatives.
(AMOCs)
comments. IV. Regulatory Analyses
The Manager, Chicago Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, may approve FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If We developed this proposed rule after
AMOCs for this AD. Use the procedures you have questions about this proposed considering numerous statutes and
found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request. rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant executive orders related to rulemaking.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Mar 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 29, 2017 / Proposed Rules 15477

Below we summarize our analyses regulated area during the enforcement E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
based on a number of these statutes and period. For the reasons stated in section The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
executive orders. IV.A above, this proposed rule would of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
not have a significant economic impact Federal agencies to assess the effects of
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
on a substantial number of small their discretionary regulatory actions. In
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies entities. particular, the Act addresses actions
to assess the costs and benefits of If you think that your business, that may result in the expenditure by a
available regulatory alternatives and, if organization, or governmental State, local, or tribal government, in the
regulation is necessary, to select jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity aggregate, or by the private sector of
regulatory approaches that maximize and that this rule would have a $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
net benefits. E.O.13563 emphasizes the significant economic impact on it, more in any one year. Though this
importance of quantifying both costs please submit a comment (see proposed rule would not result in such
and benefits, of reducing costs, of ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting qualifies and how and to what degree this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
flexibility. This NPRM has not been this rule would economically affect it.
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory Under section 213(a) of the Small F. Environment
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, Business Regulatory Enforcement We have analyzed this proposed rule
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), under Department of Homeland
Office of Management and Budget. we want to assist small entities in Security Management Directive 023–01
This proposed rule is not a significant understanding this proposed rule. If the and Commandant Instruction
regulatory action under section 3(f) of rule would affect your small business, M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory organization, or governmental Guard in complying with the National
Planning and Review, as supplemented jurisdiction and you have questions Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
by Executive Order 13563, Improving concerning its provisions or options for U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and compliance, please contact the person preliminary determination that this
does not require an assessment of listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION action is one of a category of actions that
potential costs and benefits under CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will do not individually or cumulatively
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 not retaliate against small entities that have a significant effect on the human
or under section 1 of Executive Order question or complain about this environment. This proposed rule
13563. The Office of Management and proposed rule or any policy or action of involves a safety zone prohibiting vessel
Budget has not reviewed it under those the Coast Guard. traffic from a limited area surrounding
Orders. the Veterans Terminal on the waters of
The economic impact of this rule is C. Collection of Information
the Cooper River for a 3 day period.
not significant for the following reasons: This proposed rule would not call for This rule is categorically excluded from
(1) Although persons and vessels may a new collection of information under further review under paragraph 34(g) of
not enter, transit through, anchor in, or the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
remain within the safety zone without (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). Instruction. We seek any comments or
authorization from the Captain of the information that may lead to the
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Port Charleston or a designated discovery of a significant environmental
Governments
representative, they may operate in the impact from this rule.
surrounding area during the A rule has implications for federalism
enforcement period; and (2) the Coast under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has G. Protest Activities
Guard will provide advance notification a substantial direct effect on the States, The Coast Guard respects the First
of the safety zone to the local maritime on the relationship between the national Amendment rights of protesters.
community by Local Notice to Mariners government and the States, or on the Protesters are asked to contact the
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. distribution of power and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
responsibilities among the various INFORMATION CONTACT section to
B. Impact on Small Entities levels of government. We have analyzed coordinate protest activities so that your
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of this proposed rule under that Order and message can be received without
1980, (5 U.S.C. 601–612), as amended have determined that it is consistent jeopardizing the safety or security of
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism people, places, or vessels.
the potential impact of regulations on principles and preemption requirements
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small described in E.O. 13132. V. Public Participation and Request for
businesses, not-for-profit organizations Also, this proposed rule does not have Comments
that are independently owned and tribal implications under E.O. 13175, We view public participation as
operated and are not dominant in their Consultation and Coordination with essential to effective rulemaking, and
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian Tribal Governments, because it will consider all comments and material
with populations of less than 50,000. would not have a substantial direct received during the comment period.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. effect on one or more Indian tribes, on Your comment can help shape the
605(b) that this proposed rule would not the relationship between the Federal outcome of this rulemaking. If you
have a significant economic impact on Government and Indian tribes, or on the submit a comment, please include the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS

a substantial number of small entities. distribution of power and docket number for this rulemaking,
We have considered the impact of this responsibilities between the Federal indicate the specific section of this
proposed rule on small entities. This Government and Indian tribes. If you document to which each comment
rule may affect the following entities, believe this proposed rule has applies, and provide a reason for each
some of which may be small entities: implications for federalism or Indian suggestion or recommendation.
the owner or operators of vessels tribes, please contact the person listed We encourage you to submit
intending to enter, transit through, in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION comments through the Federal
anchor in, or remain within the CONTACT section above. eRulemaking Portal at http://

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Mar 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1

Document Created: 2017-03-29 01:14:37
Document Modified: 2017-03-29 01:14:37

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before April 28, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander John Downing, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 15476
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 15476 - Safety Zone; Tall Ships Charleston, Cooper River, Charleston, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 59 (March 29, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard