82_FR_16860 82 FR 16795 - Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

82 FR 16795 - Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 65 (April 6, 2017)

Page Range16795-16796
FR Document2017-06828

As a result of this review, the Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain stainless steel wire rods from India (wire rods) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping at the margins identified in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 65 (Thursday, April 6, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 65 (Thursday, April 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16795-16796]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-808]


Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of 
the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of this review, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 
certain stainless steel wire rods from India (wire rods) would likely 
lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping at the margins 
identified in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective April 6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Gziryan or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:

[[Page 16796]]

(202) 482-2201 and (202) 482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 1, 1993, the Department published the AD order on wire 
rods from India.\1\ On December 1, 2016, the Department published the 
notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of the AD order on 
wire rods,\2\ pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods 
from India, 58 FR 63335 (December 1, 1993).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 81 FR 86697 
(December 1, 2016) (Notice of Initiation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 13, 2016, the Department received a notice of intent to 
participate on behalf of Carpenter Technology Corporation, North 
American Stainless, and Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. 
(collectively, the domestic interested parties) within the 15-day 
period specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic interested 
parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the 
Act as manufacturers in the United States of a domestic like product 
for the proceeding.
    On January 3, 2017, the Department received a complete substantive 
response to the Notice of Initiation from the domestic interested 
parties within the 30-day period, specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i).\3\ We received no substantive responses from any 
respondent interested parties. As a result, pursuant to section 
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the 
Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the AD 
order on wire rods from India.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Letter from domestic interested parties regarding 
``Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India--Petitioners' Substantive 
Response,'' dated January 3, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the AD order is certain stainless steel 
wire rods from India, which are hot-rolled or hot-rolled annealed and/
or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons or other shapes, in 
coils. The wire rods subject to this order are currently classifiable 
under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 
description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum from Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary 
Gary Taverman to Acting Assistant Secretary Ronald K. Lorentzen 
entitled, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 
Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India,'' dated concurrently with this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), at 2, for a full 
description of the scope of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood 
of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the 
margins likely to prevail if the order is revoked, are addressed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this 
notice.\5\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and 
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main 
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Sunset Review

    Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, 
the Department determines that revocation of the AD order on wire rods 
from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping, and that the margins likely to prevail would be weighted-
average margins up to 48.80 percent.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to the parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of propriety information disclosed 
under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject 
to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing the final results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).

    Dated: March 30, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-06828 Filed 4-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 65 / Thursday, April 6, 2017 / Notices 16795 to entries of subject merchandise during this requirement could result in the Docket Number: 16–016. Applicant: the POR produced by a respondent for Department’s presumption that State University of New York at Stony which it did not know its merchandise reimbursement of antidumping duties Brook, Stony Brook, NY 117964–6000. was destined for the United States. In occurred and the subsequent assessment Instrument: Cryo-Electron Microscope. such instances, we will instruct CBP to of double antidumping duties. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- We are issuing and publishing these Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at others rate if there is no rate for the preliminary results in accordance with 81 FR 71703, October 18, 2016. intermediate company(ies) involved in sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, Docket Number: 16–019. Applicant: the transaction. and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and University of Nebraska-Lincoln, We intend to issue instructions to 351.221(b)(4). Lincoln, NE 68588. Instrument: Electron CBP 15 days after publication of the Dated: March 31, 2017. Microscope. Manufacturer: Elmitec, final results of this review. Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 81 Ronald K. Lorentzen, Cash Deposit Requirements FR 89434, December 12, 2016. Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Comments: None received. Decision: The following cash deposit and Compliance. Approved. No instrument of equivalent requirements will be effective for all Appendix scientific value to the foreign shipments of subject merchandise instrument, for such purposes as this entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum instrument is intended to be used, is for consumption on or after the date of being manufactured in the United States publication of the final results of this I. Summary at the time the instrument was ordered. administrative review, as provided for II. Background III. Scope of the Order Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) electron microscope and is intended for IV. Preliminary Finding of No Shipments The cash deposit rate for the companies V. Comparison to Normal Value research or scientific educational uses under review will be equal to the VI. Product Comparisons requiring an electron microscope. We weighted-average dumping margin VII. Discussion of Methodology know of no electron microscope, or any established in the final results of this A. Determination of Comparison Method other instrument suited to these review (except, if that rate is de B. Results of the Differential Pricing purposes, which was being minimis, then the cash deposit rate will Analysis manufactured in the United States at the be zero); (2) for previously reviewed or C. Date of Sale time of order of each instrument. investigated companies not listed above D. Export Price in the Preliminary Results of Review, E. Normal Value Dated: March 31, 2017. including those for which the F. Currency Conversion Gregory W. Campbell, VIII. Recommendation Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Department may determine had no shipments during the POR, the cash [FR Doc. 2017–06849 Filed 4–5–17; 8:45 am] Enforcement and Compliance. deposit rate will continue to be the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P [FR Doc. 2017–06823 Filed 4–5–17; 8:45 am] company-specific rate published for the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE firm covered in this review or another DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration completed segment of this proceeding, International Trade Administration but the manufacturer is, then the cash Rutgers University, et al.; Notice of deposit rate will be the rate established Consolidated Decision on Applications [A–533–808] for the most recently completed segment for Duty-Free Entry of Electron of this proceeding for the manufacturer Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods Microscope From India: Final Results of the of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a This is a decision consolidated Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the firm covered in this or any previously pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Antidumping Duty Order completed segment of this proceeding, Educational, Scientific, and Cultural AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, then the cash deposit rate will be the Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. International Trade Administration, ‘‘all-others’’ rate of 15.67 percent L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– Department of Commerce. established in the less-than-fair-value 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). SUMMARY: As a result of this review, the investigation.5 These deposit Related records can be viewed between Department of Commerce (the requirements, when imposed, shall 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720, Department) finds that revocation of the remain in effect until further notice. U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and antidumping duty (AD) order on certain Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Notification to Importers stainless steel wire rods from India DC. This notice serves as a preliminary (wire rods) would likely lead to a Docket Number: 16–005. Applicant: reminder to importers of their continuation or recurrence of dumping Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ responsibility under 19 CFR at the margins identified in the ‘‘Final 08854–8076. Instrument: Electron 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Results of Review’’ section of this Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI regarding the reimbursement of notice. Company, the Netherlands. Intended antidumping duties prior to liquidation Use: See notice at 81 FR 71702–03, DATES: Effective April 6, 2017. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES of the relevant entries during this October 18, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: review period. Failure to comply with Docket Number: 16–014. Applicant: Andre Gziryan or Minoo Hatten, AD/ Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011– CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 3616. Instrument: Electron Microscope. and Compliance, International Trade (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 5 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Administration, U.S. Department of Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 8341 (March 11, 1986). 81 FR 71703, October 18, 2016. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:51 Apr 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM 06APN1

16796 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 65 / Thursday, April 6, 2017 / Notices (202) 482–2201 and (202) 482–1690, merchandise subject to the order is Dated: March 30, 2017. respectively. dispositive.4 Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Analysis of Comments Received and Compliance. Background All issues raised in this sunset review, [FR Doc. 2017–06828 Filed 4–5–17; 8:45 am] On December 1, 1993, the Department including the likelihood of continuation BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P published the AD order on wire rods or recurrence of dumping and the from India.1 On December 1, 2016, the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order is revoked, are DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Department published the notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted Foreign-Trade Zones Board the AD order on wire rods,2 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, by this notice.5 The Issues and Decision [S–17–2017] as amended (the Act). Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement Approval of Subzone Status; Orgill, On December 13, 2016, the and Compliance’s Antidumping and Inc.; Post Falls, Idaho Department received a notice of intent to participate on behalf of Carpenter Countervailing Duty Centralized On February 9, 2017, the Executive Technology Corporation, North Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones American Stainless, and Universal ACCESS is available to registered users (FTZ) Board docketed an application Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. at http://access.trade.gov, and to all submitted by the Southwest Idaho (collectively, the domestic interested parties in the Central Records Unit, Manufacturers’ Alliance, grantee of FTZ parties) within the 15-day period Room B8024 of the main Department of 280, requesting subzone status subject to specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Commerce building. In addition, a the existing activation limit of FTZ 280, The domestic interested parties claimed complete version of the Issues and on behalf of Orgill, Inc., in Post Falls, interested party status under section Decision Memorandum can be accessed Idaho. 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in directly on the Internet at http:// The application was processed in the United States of a domestic like enforcement.trade.gov/frn. accordance with the FTZ Act and product for the proceeding. Final Results of Sunset Review Regulations, including notice in the On January 3, 2017, the Department Federal Register inviting public received a complete substantive Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and comment (82 FR 10742–10743, February response to the Notice of Initiation from 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the 15, 2017). The FTZ staff examiner the domestic interested parties within Department determines that revocation reviewed the application and the 30-day period, specified in 19 CFR of the AD order on wire rods from India determined that it meets the criteria for 351.218(d)(3)(i).3 We received no would be likely to lead to continuation approval. Pursuant to the authority substantive responses from any or recurrence of dumping, and that the delegated to the FTZ Board Executive respondent interested parties. As a margins likely to prevail would be Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) weighted-average margins up to 48.80 application to establish Subzone 280B is of the Act and 19 CFR percent. approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department Notification Regarding Administrative the Board’s regulations, including conducted an expedited (120-day) Protective Order Section 400.13, and further subject to sunset review of the AD order on wire FTZ 280’s 2,000-acre activation limit. rods from India. This notice serves as the only Dated: March 30, 2017. reminder to the parties subject to Andrew McGilvray, Scope of the Order administrative protective order (APO) of Executive Secretary. The merchandise covered by the AD their responsibility concerning the [FR Doc. 2017–06831 Filed 4–5–17; 8:45 am] order is certain stainless steel wire rods return or destruction of propriety information disclosed under APO in BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P from India, which are hot-rolled or hot- rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds, accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. squares, octagons, hexagons or other Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE shapes, in coils. The wire rods subject to this order are currently classifiable conversion to judicial protective order is International Trade Administration under subheadings 7221.00.0005, hereby requested. Failure to comply 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, with the regulations and terms of an Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and APO is a violation subject to sanction. Scientific Instruments 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff We are issuing and publishing the Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the final results and notice in accordance Although the HTSUS subheadings are Educational, Scientific and Cultural with sections 751(c), 752(c), and provided for convenience and customs Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR purposes, the written description of the L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 351.221(c)(5)(ii). 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 1 Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Stainless invite comments on the question of 4 See Memorandum from Associate Deputy whether instruments of equivalent mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Steel Wire Rods from India, 58 FR 63335 (December Assistant Secretary Gary Taverman to Acting 1, 1993). Assistant Secretary Ronald K. Lorentzen entitled, scientific value, for the purposes for 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 81 ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final which the instruments shown below are FR 86697 (December 1, 2016) (Notice of Initiation). Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the intended to be used, are being 3 See Letter from domestic interested parties Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India,’’ dated concurrently with manufactured in the United States. regarding ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Wire this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), at Comments must comply with 15 CFR Rod From India—Petitioners’ Substantive 2, for a full description of the scope of the order. 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and Response,’’ dated January 3, 2017. 5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum. be postmarked on or before April 26, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:51 Apr 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM 06APN1


Document Created: 2017-04-06 01:46:27
Document Modified: 2017-04-06 01:46:27
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective April 6, 2017.
ContactAndre Gziryan or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2201 and (202) 482-1690, respectively.
FR Citation82 FR 16795 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR