82 FR 16874 - Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility User Fee
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 65 (April 6, 2017)
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 65 (April 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 16874-16876 | |
| FR Document | 2017-06803 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 65 (Thursday, April 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 16874-16876] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-06803] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration [Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0092] Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility User Fee AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of agency action. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On November 7, 2016, PHMSA published a notice and request for comments in the Federal Register, titled ``Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility User Fee'' (November 2016 Notice), seeking comments from underground natural gas storage facility operators on a proposed PHMSA pipeline user-fee assessment and rate structure. PHMSA received nine comments in the docket. We are publishing this notice of agency action to address the comments received and to announce the rate structure PHMSA will implement in fiscal year (FY) 2017 if Congress appropriates FY 2017 funds for the Pipeline Safety Fund's Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Little by telephone at 202-366- 4569, by fax at 202-366-4566, by email at [email protected], or by mail at U.S. Department of Transportation, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., PHP-2, Washington, DC 20590-0001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA) (Pub. L. 99-272, sec. 7005), codified in part at section 60301 of title 49, United States Code, authorizes the assessment and collection of user fees to fund the pipeline safety activities conducted under chapter 601 of title 49. On June 22, 2016, President Obama signed into law the Protecting our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 (Pub. L. 114-183) (PIPES Act of 2016). Section 12 of the PIPES Act of 2016 mandates that PHMSA issue regulations for underground natural gas storage facilities, authorizes user fees on operators of these facilities, and directs PHMSA to prescribe procedures to collect those fees upon appropriation. Section 2 of the PIPES Act of 2016 authorizes $8 million per year to be appropriated from those fees for each of FY 2017-2019 for the newly established Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account in the Pipeline Safety Fund. Accordingly, if Congress appropriates funds to this account for FY 2017 and beyond, PHMSA will collect user fees from the operators of the facilities. Summary of Comments on the November 7, 2016 Notice The November 2016 Notice advised all underground natural gas storage facility operators of a proposed PHMSA pipeline user fee assessment and rate structure. 81 FR 78261. During the two-month response period, PHMSA received comments on the proposed underground natural gas storage user-fee billing methodology from nine commenters: David Reitz; the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association; ENSTOR Operating Company; Consumers Energy; Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska; Atmos Energy Corporation; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; the Texas Pipeline Association; and the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA). The comments may be found at http://www.regulations.gov in Docket Number PHMSA-2016-0092. Consumers Energy, Atmos Energy Corporation, the Texas Pipeline Association, and INGAA submitted comments generally supporting the rate structure proposed by PHMSA in the November 2016 Notice. The remaining comments are summarized below with PHMSA's response: Comment: The Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association and Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska questioned whether working-gas capacity was the most appropriate basis for the rate structure and expressed the view that using the number of wells at a facility may be a more suitable basis for the user-fee structure. Response: PHMSA agrees that the number of wells would be an appropriate basis for the user-fee rate structure. However, the PHMSA information collection results that will include the number of wells will not be available for fiscal year 2017 billing. PHMSA is aware of an underground natural gas storage facility survey recently conducted by the American Gas Association (AGA). The survey results, however, are not publicly available. PHMSA also has no way to assess the accuracy of the AGA survey results and in several cases they appear to be inconsistent with information reported to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). In the absence of available, reliable data for another suitable metric, PHMSA's only viable option for an equitable allocation of fees among facility operators in the first year is working-gas capacity. After PHMSA's annual reporting is in place and PHMSA collects information regarding the number of wells, well count is likely to become the basis of the user-fee rate structure for these facilities in future fiscal years. Comment: David Reitz suggested PHMSA base the tier determination on the working gas an operator has available to serve its customers rather than total working-gas capacity because doing so would facilitate a more precise determination of the appropriate tier in cases where storage fields are jointly owned. Response: PHMSA's source for working-gas capacity data is the EIA. PHMSA currently lacks data to determine to which customers gas in [[Page 16875]] storage is available. Therefore, PHMSA will need to use the total working-gas capacity of the field, but appreciates the comment and may revisit this issue in the future if a reliable data source becomes available that breaks working gas down by owner for jointly-owned storage fields and the joint owners are not able to apportion the fee among themselves. Comment: Pacific Gas and Electric Company recommended that PHMSA use the number of wells collected on the new PHMSA annual report as the basis for the user-fee rate structure. Response: As stated above, PHMSA agrees that the number of wells would be an appropriate basis for the fee structure. With respect to FY 2017, however, PHMSA does not expect to collect annual report data from facility operators before the FY 2017 billing. Comment: The Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association requested clarification as to how PHMSA proposes to regulate Louisiana facilities and specifically how regulatory activity will be funded. Response: PHMSA is supportive of state oversight activities and expects the appropriate Louisiana state agency to become certified to regulate Louisiana's intrastate facilities in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 60141(c). User fees collected by PHMSA from operators of intrastate underground natural gas storage facilities regulated by Louisiana would be granted to the certified Louisiana agency. PHMSA would regulate any interstate facilities in Louisiana. If a Louisiana agency does not become certified, PHMSA will be responsible for regulating both the interstate and intrastate facilities in Louisiana. Comment: ENSTOR Operating Company asked if PHMSA will sum the working-gas capacity of facilities for the operator and its affiliates. Response: PHMSA will sum the working-gas capacity for all fields operated by each holder of a PHMSA-issued operator identification number. For the past several months, PHMSA has been contacting operators of storage facilities to determine the appropriate operator identification number for each facility reported to the EIA. Comment: ENSTOR Operating Company, LLC, asked if PHMSA has a different definition of working-gas capacity than the EIA. Response: PHMSA does not have a different definition of working-gas capacity. PHMSA will use the working-gas capacity reported to the EIA. Comment: ENSTOR Operating Company, LLC, requested that PHMSA provide further analysis supporting the proposed user-fee assessment tier structure to ensure the regulated community can fully comment. Response: PHMSA provided a full description of the analysis in the November 2016 Notice. PHMSA will also place a spreadsheet in the docket with this notice to provide a more detailed breakdown of the data behind the analysis. Revised Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility User-Fee Plan As discussed above in the comment responses, in the absence of available, reliable data for another suitable metric, PHMSA's only viable option for an equitable allocation of fees among facility operators in the first year is working-gas capacity. Accordingly, for FY 2017 billing, PHMSA will use working-gas capacity as the basis for the user-fee rate structure. PHMSA will use the working-gas capacity values from the most recent Form EIA-191 Monthly Underground Natural Gas Storage Report. PHMSA will sum the working-gas capacity for all fields operated by the holder of a PHMSA-issued operator identification number. For fields where PHMSA is unable to determine the operator identification number, working-gas capacities will be summed based on the company name in the Form EIA-191 data. If a company receives a bill that it believes to be in error in some way, it should contact PHMSA for further information, using the Web site http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/operator-resources/pay-user-fee-assessments. The operator working-gas capacity values will be divided into 10 tiers. The lowest values will be in tier 1 and the highest values in tier 10. The minimum and maximum working-gas capacities for each tier will be selected to place an equal number of operators in each tier. Each tier will have a user-fee assessment to be paid by each operator in the tier. In the November 2016 Notice, PHMSA used Form EIA-191 annual data from 2015 to determine the published assessment per tier and tier ranges. Based on Form EIA-191 monthly data available through the EIA's Natural Gas Annual Respondent Query System,\1\ and summing working-gas capacity using the EIA company name, the tiers and assessment per tier to collect $8,000,000 would be: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ngqs/ngqs.cfm?f_report=RP8&f_sortby=&f_items=&f_year_start=&f_year_end=&f_show_compid=&f_fullscreen=. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Working-gas capacity Tier per operator (Mcf) range ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.............................. $11,799 Less than 930,000. 2.............................. 23,599 More than 930,000 and less than 3,000,000. 3.............................. 29,499 More than 3,000,000 and less than 5,800,000. 4.............................. 35,398 More than 5,800,000 and less than 11,000,000. 5.............................. 47,198 11,000,000 or more and less than 13,700,000. 6.............................. 58,997 More than 13,700,000 and less than 21,000,000. 7.............................. 70,796 More than 21,000,000 and less than 32,100,000. 8.............................. 76,696 More than 32,100,000 and less than 48,000,000. 9.............................. 88,496 More than 47,000,000 and less than 91,500,000. 10............................. 147,493 More than 91,500,000. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PHMSA placed a spreadsheet in the docket showing the EIA company names in each tier, as well as the methodology used to determine the assessment per tier and tier ranges. If Congress appropriates less than $8 million to the Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account, PHMSA will proportionally reduce the assessment for each tier to collect the appropriated amount. Regardless of the appropriated amount, PHMSA expects that approximately 25% will fund PHMSA actions and 75% will fund grants to certified state agencies. Finally, in the November 2016 Notice, we expressed an intent to assess user fees on operators of active fields on the [[Page 16876]] EIA list. Since then, PHMSA has learned that the EIA includes inactive fields in the Form EIA-191 data because inactive fields could be restored to service at any time. The EIA removes a field from the Form EIA-191 list only after the company reports that all wells connected to the field have been abandoned. Essentially, inactive fields on the Form EIA-191 list are idle, but not abandoned. Therefore, at least for fiscal year 2017 billing, PHMSA will use the EIA-191 form data, which includes inactive wells. This approach is also consistent with PHMSA's exercise of regulatory jurisdiction over pipelines and with its assessment of user fees on such pipelines. In an Advisory Bulletin published on August 16, 2016, titled: ``Clarifications of Terms Relating to Pipeline Operational Status,'' PHMSA emphasized that idle pipelines are subject to the same regulatory requirements as active pipelines. 81 FR 54512. This same regulatory approach applies to underground natural gas storage fields. Because inactive fields could be restored to service, PHMSA will exercise regulatory authority over inactive fields. Accordingly, PHMSA will bill both inactive and active fields appearing in the Form EIA-191 data. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2017, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.97. Alan K. Mayberry, Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety. [FR Doc. 2017-06803 Filed 4-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
![16874 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 65 / Thursday, April 6, 2017 / Notices
to the FMCSA Administrator on post- (November 2016 Notice), seeking ENSTOR Operating Company;
accident reporting requirements, comments from underground natural Consumers Energy; Cook Inlet Natural
specifically those in section 5306. gas storage facility operators on a Gas Storage Alaska; Atmos Energy
During the April 24 meeting, the proposed PHMSA pipeline user-fee Corporation; Pacific Gas and Electric
Committee will provide suggestions on assessment and rate structure. PHMSA Company; the Texas Pipeline
the implementation of its received nine comments in the docket. Association; and the Interstate Natural
recommendations, seeking We are publishing this notice of agency Gas Association of America (INGAA).
standardization of definitions related to action to address the comments received The comments may be found at http://
crash reporting, classification of and to announce the rate structure www.regulations.gov in Docket Number
Minimum Model Uniform Crash Criteria PHMSA will implement in fiscal year PHMSA–2016–0092. Consumers Energy,
(MMUCC) and which should be (FY) 2017 if Congress appropriates FY Atmos Energy Corporation, the Texas
prioritized for inclusion on police 2017 funds for the Pipeline Safety Pipeline Association, and INGAA
accident reporting forms, and a Fund’s Underground Natural Gas submitted comments generally
discussion of how to best implement the Storage Facility Safety Account. supporting the rate structure proposed
PAR’s recommendations. The PAR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: by PHMSA in the November 2016
operates in accordance with FACA. Roger Little by telephone at 202–366– Notice. The remaining comments are
4569, by fax at 202–366–4566, by email summarized below with PHMSA’s
II. Meeting Participation response:
at Roger.Little@dot.gov, or by mail at
Oral comments from the public will Comment: The Louisiana Mid-
U.S. Department of Transportation,
be heard throughout the meeting, at the Continent Oil and Gas Association and
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
discretion of the PAR chairman. Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska
PHP–2, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Members of the public may submit questioned whether working-gas
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: capacity was the most appropriate basis
written comments on the topics to be
considered during the meeting by Background for the rate structure and expressed the
Wednesday, April 12, to Federal Docket view that using the number of wells at
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget a facility may be a more suitable basis
Management System (FDMC) Docket
Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA) for the user-fee structure.
Number FMCSA–2016–0412 using any
(Pub. L. 99–272, sec. 7005), codified in Response: PHMSA agrees that the
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to part at section 60301 of title 49, United number of wells would be an
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the States Code, authorizes the assessment appropriate basis for the user-fee rate
online instructions for submitting and collection of user fees to fund the structure. However, the PHMSA
comments. pipeline safety activities conducted information collection results that will
• Fax: 202–493–2251. under chapter 601 of title 49. On June include the number of wells will not be
• Mail: Docket Management Facility; 22, 2016, President Obama signed into available for fiscal year 2017 billing.
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 law the Protecting our Infrastructure of PHMSA is aware of an underground
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of natural gas storage facility survey
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. 2016 (Pub. L. 114–183) (PIPES Act of recently conducted by the American Gas
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 2016). Section 12 of the PIPES Act of Association (AGA). The survey results,
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 2016 mandates that PHMSA issue however, are not publicly available.
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, regulations for underground natural gas PHMSA also has no way to assess the
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 storage facilities, authorizes user fees on accuracy of the AGA survey results and
p.m., E.T. Monday through Friday, operators of these facilities, and directs in several cases they appear to be
except Federal holidays. PHMSA to prescribe procedures to inconsistent with information reported
collect those fees upon appropriation. to the Energy Information
Issued on: March 30, 2017.
Section 2 of the PIPES Act of 2016 Administration (EIA). In the absence of
Larry W. Minor,
authorizes $8 million per year to be available, reliable data for another
Associate Administrator for Policy. appropriated from those fees for each of suitable metric, PHMSA’s only viable
[FR Doc. 2017–06809 Filed 4–5–17; 8:45 am] FY 2017–2019 for the newly established option for an equitable allocation of fees
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P Underground Natural Gas Storage among facility operators in the first year
Facility Safety Account in the Pipeline is working-gas capacity. After PHMSA’s
Safety Fund. Accordingly, if Congress annual reporting is in place and PHMSA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION appropriates funds to this account for collects information regarding the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials FY 2017 and beyond, PHMSA will number of wells, well count is likely to
Safety Administration collect user fees from the operators of become the basis of the user-fee rate
the facilities. structure for these facilities in future
[Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0092] fiscal years.
Summary of Comments on the
Comment: David Reitz suggested
Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural November 7, 2016 Notice
PHMSA base the tier determination on
Gas Storage Facility User Fee The November 2016 Notice advised the working gas an operator has
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous all underground natural gas storage available to serve its customers rather
Materials Safety Administration facility operators of a proposed PHMSA than total working-gas capacity because
pipeline user fee assessment and rate doing so would facilitate a more precise
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of agency action. structure. 81 FR 78261. During the two- determination of the appropriate tier in
month response period, PHMSA cases where storage fields are jointly
SUMMARY: On November 7, 2016, received comments on the proposed owned.
PHMSA published a notice and request underground natural gas storage user-fee Response: PHMSA’s source for
for comments in the Federal Register, billing methodology from nine working-gas capacity data is the EIA.
titled ‘‘Pipeline Safety: Underground commenters: David Reitz; the Louisiana PHMSA currently lacks data to
Natural Gas Storage Facility User Fee’’ Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association; determine to which customers gas in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:51 Apr 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM 06APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_16939/page/1.svg)
![16876 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 65 / Thursday, April 6, 2017 / Notices
EIA list. Since then, PHMSA has ADDRESSES: Comments should reference environmental impacts that may result
learned that the EIA includes inactive the docket number for the specific if the special permit is granted.
fields in the Form EIA–191 data because special permit request and may be Before issuing a decision on the
inactive fields could be restored to submitted in the following ways: special permit request, PHMSA will
service at any time. The EIA removes a • E-Gov Web site: http:// evaluate all comments received on or
field from the Form EIA–191 list only www.Regulations.gov. This site allows before the comment closing date.
after the company reports that all wells the public to enter comments on any
connected to the field have been Comments received after the closing
Federal Register notice issued by any date will be evaluated if it is possible to
abandoned. Essentially, inactive fields agency.
do so without incurring additional
on the Form EIA–191 list are idle, but • Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
not abandoned. Therefore, at least for • Mail: Docket Management System: expense or delay. PHMSA will consider
fiscal year 2017 billing, PHMSA will use U.S. Department of Transportation, each relevant comment we receive in
the EIA–191 form data, which includes Docket Operations, M–30, West making our decision to grant or deny a
inactive wells. Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, request.
This approach is also consistent with 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., The City of Bangor operates its less
PHMSA’s exercise of regulatory Washington, DC 20590. than one-mile-long pipeline from
jurisdiction over pipelines and with its • Hand Delivery: Docket Management terminal tankage to the Bangor
assessment of user fees on such System: U.S. Department of International Airport. The pipeline is
pipelines. In an Advisory Bulletin Transportation, Docket Operations, M– located in an industrial area of the City,
published on August 16, 2016, titled: 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room offsite of the Bangor International
‘‘Clarifications of Terms Relating to W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Pipeline Operational Status,’’ PHMSA Airport in Penobscot County, Maine.
Washington, DC 20590, between 9:00
emphasized that idle pipelines are a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through The City requests this special permit
subject to the same regulatory Friday, except Federal holidays. for safety concerns of private,
requirements as active pipelines. 81 FR Instructions: You should identify the commercial and military aircraft that
54512. This same regulatory approach docket number for the special permit refuel at the Bangor International
applies to underground natural gas request you are commenting on at the Airport. Due to the stringent quality
storage fields. Because inactive fields beginning of your comments. If you control requirements for fuel established
could be restored to service, PHMSA submit your comments by mail, please for military and commercial aircraft, any
will exercise regulatory authority over contaminants introduced during a test
submit two copies. To receive
inactive fields. Accordingly, PHMSA with water, including the water itself,
confirmation that PHMSA has received
will bill both inactive and active fields could endanger commercial and private
your comments, please include a self-
appearing in the Form EIA–191 data. aircraft, as well as the many military
addressed stamped postcard. Internet
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 31, users may submit comments at http:// missions originating from the airport.
2017, under authority delegated in 49 CFR www.Regulations.gov.
1.97. Testing the pipeline with water would
Note: There is a privacy statement force the City to cease fueling operations
Alan K. Mayberry, published on http://
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety. for an estimated 48 to72 hours. The City
www.Reglations.gov. Comments,
and the Maine Air Natural Guard
[FR Doc. 2017–06803 Filed 4–5–17; 8:45 am] including any personal information
operate under a Federal Joint Use
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P provided, are posted without changes or
edits to http://www.Regulations.gov. Agreement, which stipulates that the
airport must remain open and available
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION twenty four hours a day, seven days a
General: Ms. Kay McIver by telephone
at 202–366–0113, or email at week, to support strategic military
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials missions. This is the only pipeline that
Safety Administration kay.mciver@dot.gov.
Technical: Mr. Max Kieba by supplies fuel to the airport. Shutting
[Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0087] telephone at 202–493–0595, or email at down the airport would put the City in
max.kieba@dot.gov. breach of contract with the military.
Pipeline Safety: Request for Special SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The maximum allowable operating
Permit; City of Bangor, Maine PHMSA has received a special permit pressure of this pipeline ranges from
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous request from the City of Bangor, Maine 150 to 182 psi, and no leaks have been
Materials Safety Administration to deviate from the pipeline safety found in the past 11 years of pressure
(PHMSA); DOT. regulations to pressure test a single testing.
ACTION: Notice. segment of its pipeline with Jet-A fuel
(kerosene), rather than water as the
SUMMARY: PHMSA is publishing this Issued in Washington, DC on March 31,
medium, during the performance of a
notice to seek public comment on a 2017, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
Subpart E pressure test. A Draft
request for special permit, seeking relief 1.97.
Environmental Assessment (DEA)
from compliance with certain accompanies the special permit request. Alan K. Mayberry,
requirements in the Federal pipeline The DEA is available at http:// Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
safety regulations. At the conclusion of www.Regulations.gov, in Docket
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2017–06804 Filed 4–5–17; 8:45 am]
the 30-day comment period, PHMSA Number, PHMSA–2016–0087. We invite BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
will review the comments received from interested persons to participate by
this notice as part of its evaluation to reviewing the special permit request
grant or deny the special permit request. and DEA at http://www.Regulations.gov,
DATES: Submit any comments regarding and by submitting written comments,
this special permit request by May 8, data, or other views. Please include any
2017. comments on potential safety and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:51 Apr 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM 06APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_16939/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-06 01:46:51
Document Modified: 2017-04-06 01:46:51
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of agency action. | |
| Contact | Roger Little by telephone at 202-366- 4569, by fax at 202-366-4566, by email at [email protected], or by mail at U.S. Department of Transportation, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., PHP-2, Washington, DC 20590-0001. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 16874 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR