82 FR 17144 - Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Program; Correcting Amendment
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 67 (April 10, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 67 (April 10, 2017)
| Page Range | 17144-17146 | |
| FR Document | 2017-07035 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 67 (Monday, April 10, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 17144-17146] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-07035] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0772; FRL-9960-94-Region 4] Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Program; Correcting Amendment AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This direct final action, taken under the authority of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), corrects an error in previously promulgated rules approving certain elements of the North Carolina state implementation plan (SIP). The error relates to the North Carolina SIP's Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Standard rules and the correction removes a provision of the State's otherwise federally-enforceable regulations that could result in infringement upon the sovereign immunity of Federal facilities. The intended effect is to ensure that the North Carolina SIP is correctly identified in the applicable part of the Code of Federal Regulations and to eliminate the possibility of such infringement. DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 9, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 10, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2013-0772 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mrs. Sheckler can be reached via phone at (404) 562-9992 or electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Section 182(b)(4) of the CAA requires areas that are designated as moderate, serious, or severe ozone nonattainment to establish a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program to ensure that specified gasoline-fueled motor vehicles do not exceed prescribed emissions thresholds by requiring that vehicles undergo periodic emissions testing, including mandatory repairs for vehicles found to exceed these thresholds. This emissions testing ensures that vehicles are well maintained and operating as designed. The North Carolina I/M program began in 1982 in Mecklenburg County utilizing a ``tail-pipe'' emissions test. From 1986 through 1991 the program expanded to include eight additional counties (Wake, Forsyth, Guilford, Durham, Gaston, Cabarrus, Orange and Union County). In 1999, the North Carolina General Assembly passed legislation to expand the coverage area for the I/M program in order to gain additional emission reductions to achieve the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards in the State. This legislation expanded the I/M program from nine counties to 48 counties by adding several counties approximately every six months from July 1, 2003, to July 1, 2006. The I/M program in the expanded coverage area used on-board diagnostic (OBD) rather than tail-pipe testing. On August 7, 2002, North Carolina submitted a SIP revision to amend the I/M regulations included in the SIP at that time to, among other things, expand the counties subject to the I/M program as discussed above, require OBD in the subject counties for all model year (MY) 1996 and newer light duty gasoline vehicles, and terminate the tail-pipe testing program on January 1, 2006, for the nine counties subject to continued tail-pipe testing of MY 1995 and older vehicles. EPA approved these changes to North Carolina's I/M program into the SIP on October 30, 2002. See 67 FR 66056. North Carolina submitted additional SIP revisions related to the State's I/M program on January 31, 2008, May 24, 2010, October 11, 2013, and February 11, 2014. EPA approved North Carolina's January 31, 2008, May 24, 2010, October 11, 2013, and February 11, 2014, SIP revisions pertaining to state rule changes to the State's I/M program on February 5, 2015. See 80 FR 6455. II. Error Correction The CAA sets forth requirements for Federal facilities which are located in I/M program areas. These requirements in section 118(c) and (d) apply to both Federal fleet and Federal employee vehicles. Congress intended in that section that Federal facilities located in I/M program areas demonstrate compliance with certain local and State I/M requirements. When EPA published the I/M rule in 1992, see 57 FR 52950, the Agency interpreted CAA section 118(c) and (d) as a partial waiver of the Federal government's sovereign immunity, thereby allowing States to regulate Federal facilities in their I/M programs.\1\ Accordingly, EPA established certain SIP requirements for Federal facilities in the I/M rule. Since that time, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has found that sections 118(c) and (d) do not waive sovereign immunity for the Federal government and thus states are without authority to enforce the section 118(c) and (d) requirements for Federal facilities.\2\ Further, DOJ found that the express waiver of sovereign immunity in section 118(a) extends only to nondiscriminatory requirements (i.e., each agency and employee of the Federal government ``shall be subject to, and comply with, all Federal, State, interstate, and local requirements, administrative authority, and process and sanctions respecting the control and abatement of air pollution in the same [[Page 17145]] manner, and to the same extent as any nongovernmental entity.''). As explained below, section 118(a)'s immunity waiver does not extend to State I/M requirements that, like the North Carolina provision at issue here, are imposed upon Federal entities in a different manner or to a different extent than nongovernmental entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See letter from Gay MacGregor, Director, Regional and State Programs Division, EPA Office of Air and Radiation, to Mary Jo Leugers, Virginia Office of the Attorney General (August 28, 1998) (MacGregor Letter). \2\ See letter from Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division, to Scott Fulton, Acting General Counsel, EPA (July 29, 1998) (Schiffer Letter). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- North Carolina's regulation 15A NCAC 02D.1002(a)(3) identifies vehicles that are operated on a Federal installation and that meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.356(a)(4) as subject to the State motor vehicle emission standard. This North Carolina regulation thus subjects certain vehicles operated on Federal installations to State I/M requirements that do not apply in the same manner and to the same extent to nongovernmental entities, and it is inconsistent with the waiver of immunity in section 118(a). As noted in the MacGregor Letter addressing the issue, removing Federal facility I/M requirements from SIPs will in no way impact the emissions reductions credits the States earn for their I/M programs; pursuant to section 118(a), Federal agencies are required to comply with air pollution control programs to the same extent as nongovernmental entities and thus will continue to be subject to programs of general applicability. EPA is therefore removing from the federally-approved North Carolina SIP regulation 15A NCAC 02D.1002(a)(3) because that regulation does not apply to vehicles operated on Federal installations in the same manner and to the same extent as vehicles owned or operated by nongovernmental entities. III. Final Action Pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(6), EPA rescinds its previous approval of NCAC 02D.1002(a)(3), a provision that sets forth additional requirements under the vehicle I/M program for motor vehicles operated on Federal installations that do not apply to nongovernmental entities and thus is inconsistent with CAA section 118(a). This action will not result in increases in emissions that would interfere with attainment or maintenance of any NAAQS or with any other applicable requirement of the CAA. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely corrects North Carolina's EPA-approved SIP by removing the State's regulation 15A NCAC 02D.1002 (a)(3), which listed Federal facilities as applicable to the state motor vehicle emission standard and 40 CFR 51.356(a)(4), by removing it from the federally-approved portion of the North Carolina SIP to be consistent with CAA 118. It imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Furthermore, this action does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule merely removes North Carolina regulation 15A NCAC 02D.1002 (a)(3) from the federally approved portion of the North Carolina SIP to be consistent with CAA 118; it also does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In addition, this rule does not involve technical standards, thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule also does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 9, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by Reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: March 15, 2017. V. Anne Heard, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart II--North Carolina 0 2. Section 52.1770(c) is amended by revising the entry for ``Sect .1002'' to read as follows: Sec. 52.1770 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * [[Page 17146]] Table 1--EPA Approved North Carolina Regulations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section .1000 Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Standards ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Sect .1002..................... Applicability....... 1/1/2014 4/10/2017 [Insert Paragraph (a)(3) of Federal Register Section .1002 is citation]. hereby rescinded as this paragraph is inconsistent with the limits on the waiver of sovereign immunity established in section 118(a) of the CAA. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2017-07035 Filed 4-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![17144 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 67 / Monday, April 10, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Sources subject to the jurisdiction considered the official comment and subject to the I/M program as discussed
of local air authorities (except Benton should include discussion of all points above, require OBD in the subject
Clean Air Agency and Southwest Clean you wish to make. EPA will generally counties for all model year (MY) 1996
Air Agency); not consider comments or comment and newer light duty gasoline vehicles,
* * * * * contents located outside of the primary and terminate the tail-pipe testing
[FR Doc. 2017–07022 Filed 4–7–17; 8:45 am] submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or program on January 1, 2006, for the nine
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P other file sharing system). For counties subject to continued tail-pipe
additional submission methods, the full testing of MY 1995 and older vehicles.
EPA public comment policy, EPA approved these changes to North
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION information about CBI or multimedia Carolina’s I/M program into the SIP on
AGENCY submissions, and general guidance on October 30, 2002. See 67 FR 66056.
making effective comments, please visit North Carolina submitted additional SIP
40 CFR Part 52 https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ revisions related to the State’s I/M
commenting-epa-dockets. program on January 31, 2008, May 24,
[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0772; FRL–9960–94–
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
2010, October 11, 2013, and February
Region 4]
Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory 11, 2014. EPA approved North
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Management Section, Air Planning and Carolina’s January 31, 2008, May 24,
Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 2010, October 11, 2013, and February
Program; Correcting Amendment and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 11, 2014, SIP revisions pertaining to
Environmental Protection Agency, state rule changes to the State’s I/M
AGENCY: Environmental Protection program on February 5, 2015. See 80 FR
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Agency. 6455.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mrs.
ACTION: Direct final rule. Sheckler can be reached via phone at II. Error Correction
SUMMARY: This direct final action, taken (404) 562–9992 or electronic mail at The CAA sets forth requirements for
under the authority of the Clean Air Act sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. Federal facilities which are located in I/
(CAA or Act), corrects an error in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: M program areas. These requirements in
previously promulgated rules approving I. Background section 118(c) and (d) apply to both
certain elements of the North Carolina Federal fleet and Federal employee
state implementation plan (SIP). The Section 182(b)(4) of the CAA requires vehicles. Congress intended in that
error relates to the North Carolina SIP’s areas that are designated as moderate, section that Federal facilities located in
Motor Vehicle Emissions Control serious, or severe ozone nonattainment I/M program areas demonstrate
Standard rules and the correction to establish a motor vehicle inspection compliance with certain local and State
removes a provision of the State’s and maintenance (I/M) program to I/M requirements. When EPA published
otherwise federally-enforceable ensure that specified gasoline-fueled the I/M rule in 1992, see 57 FR 52950,
regulations that could result in motor vehicles do not exceed prescribed the Agency interpreted CAA section
infringement upon the sovereign emissions thresholds by requiring that 118(c) and (d) as a partial waiver of the
immunity of Federal facilities. The vehicles undergo periodic emissions Federal government’s sovereign
intended effect is to ensure that the testing, including mandatory repairs for immunity, thereby allowing States to
North Carolina SIP is correctly vehicles found to exceed these regulate Federal facilities in their I/M
identified in the applicable part of the thresholds. This emissions testing programs.1 Accordingly, EPA
Code of Federal Regulations and to ensures that vehicles are well established certain SIP requirements for
eliminate the possibility of such maintained and operating as designed. Federal facilities in the I/M rule. Since
infringement. The North Carolina I/M program that time, the Department of Justice
began in 1982 in Mecklenburg County (DOJ) has found that sections 118(c) and
DATES: This direct final rule is effective utilizing a ‘‘tail-pipe’’ emissions test. (d) do not waive sovereign immunity for
June 9, 2017 without further notice, From 1986 through 1991 the program the Federal government and thus states
unless EPA receives adverse comment expanded to include eight additional are without authority to enforce the
by May 10, 2017. If EPA receives such counties (Wake, Forsyth, Guilford, section 118(c) and (d) requirements for
comments, it will publish a timely Durham, Gaston, Cabarrus, Orange and Federal facilities.2 Further, DOJ found
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Union County). In 1999, the North that the express waiver of sovereign
Federal Register and inform the public Carolina General Assembly passed immunity in section 118(a) extends only
that the rule will not take effect. legislation to expand the coverage area to nondiscriminatory requirements (i.e.,
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, for the I/M program in order to gain each agency and employee of the
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– additional emission reductions to Federal government ‘‘shall be subject to,
OAR–2013–0772 at https:// achieve the 1997 8-hour ozone national and comply with, all Federal, State,
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online ambient air quality standards in the interstate, and local requirements,
instructions for submitting comments. State. This legislation expanded the I/M administrative authority, and process
Once submitted, comments cannot be program from nine counties to 48 and sanctions respecting the control and
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. counties by adding several counties abatement of air pollution in the same
EPA may publish any comment received approximately every six months from
to its public docket. Do not submit July 1, 2003, to July 1, 2006. The I/M 1 See letter from Gay MacGregor, Director,
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
electronically any information you program in the expanded coverage area Regional and State Programs Division, EPA Office
of Air and Radiation, to Mary Jo Leugers, Virginia
consider to be Confidential Business used on-board diagnostic (OBD) rather Office of the Attorney General (August 28, 1998)
Information (CBI) or other information than tail-pipe testing. On August 7, (MacGregor Letter).
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 2002, North Carolina submitted a SIP 2 See letter from Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, revision to amend the I/M regulations Attorney General, Department of Justice
Environment and Natural Resources Division, to
etc.) must be accompanied by a written included in the SIP at that time to, Scott Fulton, Acting General Counsel, EPA (July 29,
comment. The written comment is among other things, expand the counties 1998) (Schiffer Letter).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:16 Apr 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\10APR1.SGM 10APR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17211/page/1.svg)
![17146 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 67 / Monday, April 10, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—EPA APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
State effective
State citation Title/subject EPA approval date Explanation
date
Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements
* * * * * * *
Section .1000 Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Standards
* * * * * * *
Sect .1002 ................. Applicability ................................ 1/1/2014 4/10/2017 [Insert Federal Reg- Paragraph (a)(3) of Section
ister citation]. .1002 is hereby rescinded as
this paragraph is inconsistent
with the limits on the waiver of
sovereign immunity estab-
lished in section 118(a) of the
CAA.
* * * * * * *
* * * * * in the Environmental Protection Agency B. How can I get electronic access to
[FR Doc. 2017–07035 Filed 4–7–17; 8:45 am] Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William other related information?
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC You may access a frequently updated
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., through the Government Printing
AGENCY Monday through Friday, excluding legal Office’s e-CFR site at http://
holidays. The telephone number for the www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-
40 CFR Part 180 Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0005; FRL–9959–90] and the telephone number for the OPP 40tab_02.tpl.
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review C. How can I file an objection or hearing
Acetamiprid; Pesticide Tolerances for the visitor instructions and additional request?
Emergency Exemption information about the docket available
AGENCY: Environmental Protection at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. Under section 408(g) of the Federal
Agency (EPA). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
Michael L. Goodis, Registration Division 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
ACTION: Final rule.
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, objection to any aspect of this regulation
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 and may also request a hearing on those
time-limited tolerances for residues of Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, objections. You must file your objection
acetamiprid in or on sugarcane, cane DC 20460–0001; main telephone or request a hearing on this regulation
and sugarcane, molasses. This action is number: (703) 305–7090; email address: in accordance with the instructions
associated with the issuance of a crisis RDFRNotices@epa.gov. provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
exemption under the Federal proper receipt by EPA, you must
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of the I. General Information OPP–2017–0005 in the subject line on
pesticide on sugarcane. This regulation the first page of your submission. All
establishes maximum permissible levels A. Does this action apply to me? objections and requests for a hearing
for residues of acetamiprid in or on You may be potentially affected by must be in writing, and must be
sugarcane, cane and sugarcane, this action if you are an agricultural received by the Hearing Clerk on or
molasses. The time-limited tolerances producer, food manufacturer, or before June 9, 2017. Addresses for mail
expire on December 31, 2019. pesticide manufacturer. The following and hand delivery of objections and
DATES: This regulation is effective April list of North American Industrial hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
10, 2017. Objections and requests for Classification System (NAICS) codes is 178.25(b).
hearings must be received on or before not intended to be exhaustive, but rather In addition to filing an objection or
June 9, 2017, and must be filed in provides a guide to help readers hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
accordance with the instructions determine whether this document as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also applies to them. Potentially affected submit a copy of the filing (excluding
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY entities may include: any Confidential Business Information
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
INFORMATION). • Crop production (NAICS code 111). (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, • Animal production (NAICS code Information not marked confidential
identified by docket identification (ID) 112). pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0005, is • Food manufacturing (NAICS code disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
available at http://www.regulations.gov 311). notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS objection or hearing request, identified
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) code 32532). by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:16 Apr 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\10APR1.SGM 10APR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17211/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-08 03:30:56
Document Modified: 2017-04-08 03:30:56
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule is effective June 9, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 10, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mrs. Sheckler can be reached via phone at (404) 562-9992 or electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 17144 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR