82 FR 17380 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Butte County Air Quality Management District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 68 (April 11, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 68 (April 11, 2017)
| Page Range | 17380-17382 | |
| FR Document | 2017-07151 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 11, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 17380-17382] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-07151] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0466; FRL-9957-15-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Butte County Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the necessary procedures to create emission reduction credits (ERCs) from the reduction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, particulate matter and carbon monoxide emissions due to the permanent curtailment of burning rice straw. We are approving a local rule that provides administrative procedures for creating ERCs consistent with Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements. DATES: This rule is effective on June 12, 2017 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by May 11, 2017. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2016-0466 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief at [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud or other file sharing system). For [[Page 17381]] additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972- 3848, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of this rule? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule D. Public Comment and Proposed Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this action with the dates that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Rule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BCAQMD........................ 433 Rice Straw April 24, 2014... November 6, 2014. Emission Reduction Credits. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On December 18, 2014, the EPA determined that the submittal for BCAQMD Rule 433 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of this rule? There are no previous versions of Rule 433 in the SIP, although the BCAQMD adopted an earlier version of this rule on August 26, 2010, and CARB submitted it to us on February 6, 2013. While we can act on only the most recently submitted version, we have reviewed materials provided with previous submittals. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule? Historically, the practice of rice growing included burning the field stubble or straw following harvest to kill weeds and insects, and to prepare the field for the next year's plantings. The purpose of Rule 433 is to provide procedures to quantify, certify and issue ERCs that have resulted from the permanent curtailment of rice straw burning in the BCAQMD. Approval of Rule 433 into the SIP would allow these ERCs to be used as offsets under BCAQMD's New Source Review (NSR) rule. The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about this rule. II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emission reductions (see CAA section 193). In addition, a rule that generates ERCs for use as offsets in the NSR program must meet the NSR requirement for valid offsets (see section 173(c)) and should meet the criteria set forth in EPA's guidance concerning economic incentive programs. Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, SIP relaxation, NSR and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria include the following: 1. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990) 2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 3. New Source Review--Section 173(c) of the CAA and 40 CFR part 51, appendix S, ``Emission Offset Interpretative Ruling'' require certain sources to obtain emission reductions to offset increased emissions from new projects. 4. ``Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs,'' EPA- 452/R-01-001, January 2001. B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? We believe this rule is consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability and economic incentive programs. This rule includes detailed emissions quantification protocols and enforceable procedures that provide the necessary assurance that the ERCs issued will meet the criteria for valid NSR offsets. The TSD has more information on our evaluation. C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agency modifies the rule. D. Public Comment and Proposed Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving the submitted rule because we believe it fulfills all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule. If we receive adverse comments by May 11, 2017, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on June 12, 2017. This will incorporate the rule into the federally enforceable SIP. Please note that if the EPA receives an adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph or section of this rule, and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the [[Page 17382]] BCAQMD rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 12, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: December 9, 2016. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Editorial note: This document was received at the Office of the Federal Register on April 5, 2017. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(457)(i)(C)(5) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (457) * * * (i) * * * (C) * * * (5) Rule 433, ``Rice Straw Emission Reduction Credits,'' amended on April 24, 2014. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2017-07151 Filed 4-10-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![17380 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
boundaries, altitudes, or operating Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
requirements of the airspace, therefore, AGENCY
notice and public procedure under 5 Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
U.S.C. 553(b) is unnecessary. Navigation (Air). 40 CFR Part 52
Regulatory Notices and Analyses The Amendment [EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0466; FRL–9957–15-
Region 9]
The FAA has determined that this In consideration of the foregoing, the
regulation only involves an established Federal Aviation Administration Approval of California Air Plan
body of technical regulations for which amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: Revisions, Butte County Air Quality
frequent and routine amendments are Management District
necessary to keep them operationally PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
current. It, therefore: (1) Is not a B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR Agency (EPA).
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
ACTION: Direct final rule.
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a REPORTING POINTS
‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; continues to read as follows: action to approve a revision to the Butte
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not County Air Quality Management District
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
warrant preparation of a Regulatory (BCAQMD) portion of the California
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
Evaluation as the anticipated impact is State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
so minimal. Since this is a routine revision concerns the necessary
matter that only affects air traffic § 71.1 [Amended] procedures to create emission reduction
procedures and air navigation, it is credits (ERCs) from the reduction of
■ 2. The incorporation by reference in volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.911A, oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur,
economic impact on a substantial Airspace Designations and Reporting particulate matter and carbon monoxide
number of small entities under the Points, dated August 3, 2016, effective emissions due to the permanent
September 15, 2016, is amended as curtailment of burning rice straw. We
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
follows: are approving a local rule that provides
Environmental Review administrative procedures for creating
Paragraph 4000 Class C Airspace. ERCs consistent with Clean Air Act
The FAA has determined that this * * * * * (CAA or the Act) requirements.
action of modifying the Little Rock, AR, DATES: This rule is effective on June 12,
Class C airspace area by amending the ASW AR C Little Rock, AR
2017 without further notice, unless the
legal description to contain the current Bill and Hillary Clinton National/Adams EPA receives adverse comments by May
airport name and updating airport Field, AR 11, 2017. If we receive such comments,
reference point (ARP) information to (Lat. 34°43′46″ N., long. 92°13′29″ W.)
we will publish a timely withdrawal in
match the FAA’s aeronautical database That airspace extending upward from the the Federal Register to notify the public
and charted information qualifies for surface to and including 4,300 feet MSL that this direct final rule will not take
categorical exclusion under the National within a 5-mile radius of the Bill and Hillary effect.
Environmental Policy Act, and its Clinton National/Adams Field; and that ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
agency implementing regulations in airspace extending upward from 1,500 feet identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
FAA Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental MSL to and including 4,300 feet MSL within OAR–2016–0466 at http://
Impacts: Policies and Procedures’’ a 10-mile radius of the Bill and Hillary
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
regarding categorical exclusions for Clinton National/Adams Field from the 030°
Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office
procedural actions at paragraph 5–6.5a, bearing from the airport clockwise to the 210°
Chief at Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For
which categorically excludes from full bearing from the airport and that airspace
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
environmental impact review extending upward from 1,800 feet MSL to
follow the online instructions for
rulemaking actions that designate or and including 4,300 feet MSL within a 10-
submitting comments. Once submitted,
modify classes of airspace areas, mile radius of the airport from the 210°
bearing from the airport clockwise to the 310°
comments cannot be removed or edited
airways, routes, and reporting points. from Regulations.gov. For either manner
bearing from the airport and that airspace
Since this action does not change the of submission, the EPA may publish any
extending upward from 2,100 feet MSL to
boundaries, altitudes, or operating comment received to its public docket.
and including 4,300 feet MSL from the 310°
requirements of the Class C airspace Do not submit electronically any
bearing from the airport clockwise to the 030°
area, this airspace action is not expected information you consider to be
bearing from the airport, excluding that
to result in any significant airspace within R–2403B when active. Confidential Business Information (CBI)
environmental impacts. In accordance or other information whose disclosure is
with FAAO 1050.1F, paragraph 5–2 Issued in Washington, DC, on April 4, restricted by statute. Multimedia
regarding Extraordinary Circumstances, 2017. submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
this action has been reviewed for factors Gemechu Gelgelu, accompanied by a written comment.
and circumstances in which a normally Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group. The written comment is considered the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
categorically excluded action may have [FR Doc. 2017–07116 Filed 4–10–17; 8:45 am] official comment and should include
a significant environmental impact BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
discussion of all points you wish to
requiring further analysis, and it is make. The EPA will generally not
determined that no extraordinary consider comments or comment
circumstances exist that warrant contents located outside of the primary
preparation of an environmental submission (i.e., on the web, cloud or
assessment. other file sharing system). For
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Apr 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM 11APR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17448/page/1.svg)
![17382 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
BCAQMD rule described in the practicable and legally permissible Reporting and recordkeeping
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth methods, under Executive Order 12898 requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
below. The EPA has made, and will (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). organic compounds.
continue to make, these documents In addition, the SIP is not approved Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
available through www.regulations.gov to apply on any Indian reservation land
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please or in any other area where the EPA or Dated: December 9, 2016.
contact the person identified in the FOR an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a Alexis Strauss,
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
this preamble for more information). Indian country, the rule does not have
Editorial note: This document was
tribal implications and will not impose received at the Office of the Federal Register
IV. Statutory and Executive Order substantial direct costs on tribal on April 5, 2017.
Reviews governments or preempt tribal law as
Under the Clean Air Act, the specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
Administrator is required to approve a FR 67249, November 9, 2000). of Federal Regulations is amended as
SIP submission that complies with the The Congressional Review Act, 5 follows:
provisions of the Act and applicable U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement PART 52—APPROVAL AND
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides PROMULGATION OF
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
that before a rule may take effect, the IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that agency promulgating the rule must ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air submit a rule report, which includes a continues to read as follows:
Act. Accordingly, this action merely copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action Subpart F—California
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, and other required information to the ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by
this action: U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of adding paragraph (c)(457)(i)(C)(5) to
• Is not a significant regulatory action Representatives, and the Comptroller read as follows:
subject to review by the Office of General of the United States prior to
Management and Budget under publication of the rule in the Federal § 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Register. A major rule cannot take effect * * * * *
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, until 60 days after it is published in the (c) * * *
January 21, 2011); Federal Register. This action is not a (457) * * *
• does not impose an information ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. (i) * * *
collection burden under the provisions 804(2). (C) * * *
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean (5) Rule 433, ‘‘Rice Straw Emission
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Air Act, petitions for judicial review of Reduction Credits,’’ amended on April
• is certified as not having a this action must be filed in the United 24, 2014.
significant economic impact on a States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 12, 2017. * * * * *
substantial number of small entities [FR Doc. 2017–07151 Filed 4–10–17; 8:45 am]
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Filing a petition for reconsideration by
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); the Administrator of this final rule does
• does not contain any unfunded not affect the finality of this action for
mandate or significantly or uniquely the purposes of judicial review nor does
affect small governments, as described it extend the time within which a DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act petition for judicial review may be filed,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); and shall not postpone the effectiveness
Administration
• does not have Federalism of such rule or action. Parties with
implications as specified in Executive objections to this direct final rule are
50 CFR Part 300
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, encouraged to file a comment in
1999); response to the parallel notice of [Docket No. 170223197–7311–01]
• is not an economically significant proposed rulemaking for this action
RIN 0648–BG67
regulatory action based on health or published in the Proposed Rules section
safety risks subject to Executive Order of today’s Federal Register, rather than International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); file an immediate petition for judicial Fisheries; Fishing Restrictions for
• is not a significant regulatory action review of this direct final rule, so that Tropical Tuna in the Eastern Pacific
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR the EPA can withdraw this direct final Ocean
28355, May 22, 2001); rule and address the comment in the
• is not subject to requirements of proposed rulemaking. This action may AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Section 12(d) of the National not be challenged later in proceedings to Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Technology Transfer and Advancement enforce its requirements (see section Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 307(b)(2)). Commerce.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
application of those requirements would ACTION: Final rule.
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
and Environmental protection, Air SUMMARY: NMFS is issuing regulations
• does not provide the EPA with the pollution control, Carbon monoxide, under the Tuna Conventions Act to
discretionary authority to address, as Incorporation by reference, implement Resolution C–17–01
appropriate, disproportionate human Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen (Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern
health or environmental effects, using dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Pacific Ocean During 2017), which was
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Apr 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM 11APR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17448/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-11 00:48:42
Document Modified: 2017-04-11 00:48:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on June 12, 2017 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by May 11, 2017. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972- 3848, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 17380 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR