82_FR_17700 82 FR 17631 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

82 FR 17631 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 69 (April 12, 2017)

Page Range17631-17633
FR Document2017-07364

On December 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This review covers one producer/exporter of subject merchandise, JBF RAK LLC (JBF). Based on our analysis of the comments and information received, we made changes to the preliminary results, which are discussed below. The final weighted-average dumping margin is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 69 (Wednesday, April 12, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17631-17633]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-520-803]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United 
Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, 
sheet, and strip (PET Film) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This 
review

[[Page 17632]]

covers one producer/exporter of subject merchandise, JBF RAK LLC (JBF). 
Based on our analysis of the comments and information received, we made 
changes to the preliminary results, which are discussed below. The 
final weighted-average dumping margin is listed below in the section 
entitled ``Final Results of Review.''

DATES: Effective April 12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4261.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 9, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results.\1\ On January 9, 2017, the Department received a timely-filed 
case brief from JBF.\2\ No other party filed a case or rebuttal brief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 89061 (December 9, 2016) 
(Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet and Strip 
from the United Arab Emirates (A-520-803); Case Brief of JBF RAK, 
LLC,'' dated January 9, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Review

    The period of review is November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, pre-
treated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film (PET Film), whether 
extruded or co-extruded. Excluded are metallized films and other 
finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by 
the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer 
more than 0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is roller transport 
cleaning film which has at least one of its surfaces modified by 
application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR latex. Tracing and drafting film 
is also excluded. PET Film is classifiable under subheading 
3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the sole case brief filed in this review are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of the 
issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to 
this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document 
and is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit of the main Commerce Building, room B-8024. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum is also 
accessible on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, 
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, 
``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene 
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: 
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,'' (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with and herby adopted by 
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to 
our margin calculations for JBF. A complete discussion of these changes 
can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    As a result of this review, we determine that the following 
weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period of November 1, 
2014, through October 31, 2015:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                                                        dumping margin
                Producer or Exporter                      (percent ad
                                                           valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JBF RAK LLC.........................................               7.91
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.\4\ The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment 
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
these final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Department applied the assessment rate calculation 
method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 
Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 
14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For assessment purposes, we calculated importer-specific, ad 
valorem assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of 
those same sales.\5\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries covered by this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final 
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act): (1) For JBF, the cash deposit rate will be equal 
to the weighted-average dumping margin listed above in the section 
``Final Results of the Administrative Review;'' (2) for merchandise 
exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but 
covered in a previously completed segment of this proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in 
the final results for the most recent period in which that producer or 
exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in 
this review or in any previous segment of this proceeding, but the 
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be that established for 
the producer of the merchandise in these final results of review or in 
the final results for the most recent period in which that producer 
participated; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a 
firm covered in this review or in any previously completed segment of 
this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be 4.05 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the less than fair value 
investigation.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
Brazil, the People's Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates: 
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 
66596 (November 10, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose to interested parties the calculations performed 
in connection with these final results within five days of the 
publication of

[[Page 17633]]

this notice, consistent with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: April 6, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--Issues in the Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Home Market Invoice Dates
    Comment 2: Home Market Commissions
IV. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2017-07364 Filed 4-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices                                                  17631

                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  test in this case, for further explanation                                        Weighted-average
                                                                                                          and consideration.3 Further, the court                  Exporter or producer      dumping margins
                                                  International Trade Administration                      remanded for further explanation and                                                (percentage)
                                                                                                          consideration the Department’s
                                                  [A–533–857]                                                                                                     GVN Fuels Limited ...   1.07 (de minimis).
                                                                                                          determinations that: (1) Jindal SAW was                 Jindal SAW, Limited     11.24.
                                                  Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods                       unaffiliated with certain suppliers of
                                                  From India: Notice of Court Decision                    inputs; (2) Jindal SAW’s yield loss data                  With respect to GVN, because we
                                                  Not in Harmony With Final                               reasonably reflected its costs of                      have calculated a de minimis weighted-
                                                  Determination of Sales at Less Than                     production; and (3) the highest COP in                 average dumping margin, in the event
                                                  Fair Value and Final Negative                           GVN’s cost database should be assigned                 the court’s ruling is not appealed or, if
                                                  Determination of Critical                               to its dual-grade products.4 On August                 appealed, upheld by a final and
                                                  Circumstances and Notice of Amended                     31, 2016, the Department issued its final              conclusive court decision, the
                                                  Final Determination                                     results of redetermination pursuant to                 Department will amend the order to
                                                                                                          remand in accordance with the CIT’s                    exclude GVN’s entries from further
                                                  AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                    order.5 On remand, the Department                      suspension of liquidation and will order
                                                  International Trade Administration,                     revised the weighted-average dumping                   all entries currently suspended to be
                                                  Department of Commerce.                                 margins for both GVN and Jindal SAW.                   liquidated without regard to dumping
                                                  SUMMARY: On March 16, 2017, the                         On March 16, 2017, the CIT sustained                   duties.
                                                  United States Court of International                    the Department’s Final
                                                  Trade (CIT) entered final judgment                      Redetermination.6                                      Amended Cash Deposit Rates
                                                  sustaining the final results of remand                                                                            Neither GVN nor Jindal SAW have a
                                                  redetermination pursuant to court order                 Timken Notice
                                                                                                                                                                 superseding cash deposit rate (e.g., from
                                                  by the Department of Commerce                             In its decision in Timken,7 as clarified             an administrative review) and,
                                                  (Department) pertaining to the less-than-               by Diamond Sawblades,8 the Court of                    therefore, the Department will issue
                                                  fair-value (LTFV) investigation of                      Appeals for the Federal Circuit held                   revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
                                                  certain oil country tubular goods                       that, pursuant to section 516A(c) of the               Customs and Border Protection. For
                                                  (OCTG) from India. The Department is                    Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),              Jindal SAW, the revised cash deposit
                                                  notifying the public that the final                     the Department must publish a notice of                rate will be the rate indicated above,
                                                  judgment in this case is not in harmony                 court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’              effective March 26, 2017. For GVN,
                                                  with the Department’s final                             with a Department determination and                    because the revised weighted-average
                                                  determination in the LTFV investigation                 must suspend liquidation of entries                    dumping margin is de minimis, the
                                                  of OCTG from India.                                     pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.               revised cash deposit rate will be zero,
                                                  DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2017.                  The CIT’s March 16, 2017, judgment                     effective March 26, 2017.
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        constitutes a final decision of that court
                                                                                                                                                                 Notification to Interested Parties
                                                  Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,                       that is not in harmony with the
                                                  Office VII, Enforcement and                             Department’s Final Determination. This                   This notice is issued and published in
                                                  Compliance, International Trade                         notice is published in fulfillment of the              accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
                                                  Administration, U.S. Department of                      publication requirements of Timken.                    751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                                  Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue                      Accordingly, the Department will                         Dated: April 6, 2017.
                                                  NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:                   continue suspension of liquidation of                  Ronald K. Lorentzen,
                                                  (202) 482–4261.                                         subject merchandise pending expiration                 Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              of the period of appeal or, if appealed,               and Compliance.
                                                                                                          pending a final and conclusive court                   [FR Doc. 2017–07362 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am]
                                                  Background                                              decision.                                              BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                     On July 18, 2014, the Department                     Amended Final Determination
                                                  published its final determination of
                                                  sales at LTFV and final negative                           Because there is now a final court                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                  determination of critical circumstances                 decision, the Department is amending
                                                  in this proceeding.1 The Department                     the Final Determination with respect to                International Trade Administration
                                                  reached affirmative determinations for                  GVN and Jindal SAW. The revised                        [A–520–803]
                                                  mandatory respondents GVN Fuels                         weighted-average dumping margins for
                                                  Limited (GVN) and Jindal SAW, Limited                   GVN and Jindal SAW for the period July                 Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
                                                  (Jindal SAW). U.S. Steel appealed the                   1, 2012, through June 30, 2013, are as                 Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab
                                                  Final Determination to the CIT, and on                  follows:                                               Emirates: Final Results of
                                                  May 5, 2016, the CIT sustained, in part,                                                                       Antidumping Duty Administrative
                                                  and remanded, in part, the Final                          3 See   US Steel, 179 F. Supp. 3d at 1120.           Review; 2014–2015
                                                  Determination.2 The court remanded the                    4 Id.

                                                  Final Determination to the Department                     5 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant      AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                  with respect to its differential pricing                to Remand, United States Steel Corporation et al.      International Trade Administration,
                                                  analysis, specifically the Department’s
                                                                                                          and Maverick Tube Corporation et al. v. United         Commerce.
                                                                                                          States, Consolidated Court No. 14–00263, dated
                                                  application and explanation of its ratio                                                                       SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                          August 31, 2017 (Final Redetermination).
                                                                                                            6 See United States Steel Corporation et al. v.      Department of Commerce (the
                                                    1 See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than       United States, Slip Op. 17–28, Consolidated Court      Department) published the preliminary
                                                  Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of          No. 14–00263 (CIT 2017).                               results of administrative review of the
                                                  Critical Circumstances: Certain Oil Country Tubular       7 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d. 337
                                                                                                                                                                 antidumping duty order on
                                                  Good from India, 79 FR 41981 (July 18, 2014) (Final     (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
                                                  Determination).                                           8 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
                                                                                                                                                                 polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
                                                    2 See United States Steel Corp. v. United States,     United States, 626 F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)         and strip (PET Film) from the United
                                                  179 F. Supp. 3d 1114 (CIT 2016) (US Steel).             (Diamond Sawblades).                                   Arab Emirates (UAE). This review


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:45 Apr 11, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00007    Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM   12APN1


                                                  17632                        Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices

                                                  covers one producer/exporter of subject                 Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 A                     assessment instructions directly to CBP
                                                  merchandise, JBF RAK LLC (JBF). Based                   list of the issues addressed in the Issues             15 days after the date of publication of
                                                  on our analysis of the comments and                     and Decision Memorandum is appended                    these final results of review.
                                                  information received, we made changes                   to this notice. The Issues and Decision                  For assessment purposes, we
                                                  to the preliminary results, which are                   Memorandum is a public document and                    calculated importer-specific, ad valorem
                                                  discussed below. The final weighted-                    is available electronically via                        assessment rates based on the ratio of
                                                  average dumping margin is listed below                  Enforcement and Compliance’s                           the total amount of dumping calculated
                                                  in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of              Antidumping and Countervailing Duty                    for the examined sales to the total
                                                  Review.’’                                               Centralized Electronic Services System                 entered value of those same sales.5 We
                                                  DATES: Effective April 12, 2017.                        (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to                       will instruct CBP to assess antidumping
                                                                                                          registered users at http://                            duties on all appropriate entries covered
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                          access.trade.gov, and it is available to               by this review.
                                                  Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,
                                                                                                          all parties in the Central Records Unit
                                                  Office VII, Enforcement and                                                                                    Cash Deposit Requirements
                                                                                                          of the main Commerce Building, room
                                                  Compliance, International Trade
                                                                                                          B–8024. In addition, a complete version                   The following cash deposit
                                                  Administration, U.S. Department of
                                                                                                          of the Issues and Decision                             requirements will be effective upon
                                                  Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
                                                                                                          Memorandum is also accessible on the                   publication of the final results of this
                                                  NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
                                                                                                          internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/              administrative review for all shipments
                                                  (202) 482–4261.
                                                                                                          frn/index.html. The signed Issues and                  of subject merchandise entered, or
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              Decision Memorandum and the                            withdrawn from warehouse, for
                                                  Background                                              electronic versions of the Issues and                  consumption on or after the publication
                                                                                                          Decision Memorandum are identical in                   date of these final results, as provided
                                                    On December 9, 2016, the Department                   content.                                               by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act
                                                  published the Preliminary Results.1 On                                                                         of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) For
                                                  January 9, 2017, the Department                         Changes Since the Preliminary Results
                                                                                                                                                                 JBF, the cash deposit rate will be equal
                                                  received a timely-filed case brief from                   Based on our analysis of the                         to the weighted-average dumping
                                                  JBF.2 No other party filed a case or                    comments received, we made changes to                  margin listed above in the section
                                                  rebuttal brief.                                         our margin calculations for JBF. A                     ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative
                                                  Period of Review                                        complete discussion of these changes                   Review;’’ (2) for merchandise exported
                                                                                                          can be found in the Issues and Decision                by producers or exporters not covered in
                                                    The period of review is November 1,                   Memorandum.                                            this review but covered in a previously
                                                  2014, through October 31, 2015.
                                                                                                          Final Results of the Administrative                    completed segment of this proceeding,
                                                  Scope of the Order                                      Review                                                 the cash deposit rate will continue to be
                                                                                                                                                                 the company-specific rate published in
                                                     The products covered by the order are                  As a result of this review, we
                                                                                                                                                                 the final results for the most recent
                                                  all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed               determine that the following weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                 period in which that producer or
                                                  polyethylene terephthalate film (PET                    average dumping margin exists for the
                                                                                                                                                                 exporter participated; (3) if the exporter
                                                  Film), whether extruded or co-extruded.                 period of November 1, 2014, through
                                                                                                                                                                 is not a firm covered in this review or
                                                  Excluded are metallized films and other                 October 31, 2015:
                                                                                                                                                                 in any previous segment of this
                                                  finished films that have had at least one
                                                                                                                                                                 proceeding, but the producer is, then
                                                  of their surfaces modified by the                                                         Weighted-average
                                                                                                                                             dumping margin      the cash deposit rate will be that
                                                  application of a performance-enhancing                        Producer or Exporter            (percent         established for the producer of the
                                                  resinous or inorganic layer more than                                                        ad valorem)       merchandise in these final results of
                                                  0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is
                                                                                                                                                                 review or in the final results for the
                                                  roller transport cleaning film which has                JBF RAK LLC .................             7.91
                                                                                                                                                                 most recent period in which that
                                                  at least one of its surfaces modified by
                                                                                                                                                                 producer participated; and (4) if neither
                                                  application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR                   Assessment Rates                                       the exporter nor the producer is a firm
                                                  latex. Tracing and drafting film is also
                                                                                                             The Department shall determine, and                 covered in this review or in any
                                                  excluded. PET Film is classifiable under
                                                                                                          U.S. Customs and Border Protection                     previously completed segment of this
                                                  subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the
                                                                                                          (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties                 proceeding, then the cash deposit rate
                                                  Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
                                                                                                          on all appropriate entries of subject                  will be 4.05 percent, the all-others rate
                                                  United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS
                                                                                                          merchandise in accordance with the                     established in the less than fair value
                                                  subheadings are provided for
                                                                                                          final results of this review.4 The                     investigation.6 These cash deposit
                                                  convenience and customs purposes, our
                                                                                                          Department intends to issue appropriate                requirements, when imposed, shall
                                                  written description of the scope of the
                                                                                                                                                                 remain in effect until further notice.
                                                  order is dispositive.                                      3 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,

                                                                                                          Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and         Disclosure
                                                  Analysis of Comments Received
                                                                                                          Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate
                                                     All issues raised in the sole case brief             Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations,        We will disclose to interested parties
                                                  filed in this review are addressed in the               ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of            the calculations performed in
                                                                                                          Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip      connection with these final results
                                                                                                          from the United Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision     within five days of the publication of
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                                    1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and     Memorandum for the Final Results,’’ (Issues and
                                                  Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary        Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with
                                                  Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative              and herby adopted by this notice.                        5 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
                                                  Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 89061 (December 9,                4 The Department applied the assessment rate          6 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
                                                  2016) (Preliminary Results).                            calculation method adopted in Antidumping              Strip from Brazil, the People’s Republic of China
                                                    2 See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,        Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average       and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty
                                                  Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A–       Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain          Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales
                                                  520–803); Case Brief of JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated           Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77        at Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab
                                                  January 9, 2017.                                        FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).                           Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 66596 (November 10, 2008).



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:45 Apr 11, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000    Frm 00008   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM    12APN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices                                                   17633

                                                  this notice, consistent with 19 CFR                     DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                2017, the Department issued a letter
                                                  351.224(b).                                                                                                   notifying interested parties of its intent
                                                                                                          International Trade Administration                    to rescind this antidumping
                                                  Notification to Importers                                                                                     circumvention inquiry on CTL plate
                                                                                                          [A–570–849]
                                                     This notice serves as a final reminder                                                                     from the PRC.5 In that letter, the
                                                  to importers of their responsibility                    Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel                    Department provided interested parties
                                                  under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a                    Plate From the People’s Republic of                   an opportunity to comment on its
                                                                                                          China: Rescission of Antidumping                      intention to rescind this antidumping
                                                  certificate regarding the reimbursement
                                                                                                          Circumvention Inquiry                                 circumvention inquiry.6 No parties
                                                  of antidumping duties prior to
                                                                                                                                                                commented on the letter.
                                                  liquidation of the relevant entries                     AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                  during this POR. Failure to comply with                 International Trade Administration,                   Rescission of Antidumping
                                                  this requirement could result in the                    Department of Commerce.                               Circumvention Inquiry
                                                  Department’s presumption that                           SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
                                                                                                                                                                  As noted above, this antidumping
                                                  reimbursement of antidumping duties                     (‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the                circumvention inquiry pertains to
                                                  occurred and the subsequent assessment                  antidumping circumvention inquiry on                  certain CTL plate products from the PRC
                                                  of doubled antidumping duties.                          certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate              containing specified levels of alloying
                                                                                                          (‘‘CTL plate’’) from the People’s
                                                                                                                                                                elements. However, there are now
                                                  Administrative Protective Order                         Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) that was
                                                                                                                                                                antidumping and countervailing duty
                                                                                                          initiated on February 10, 2016.
                                                    This notice is the only reminder to                                                                         orders on CTL plate from the PRC made
                                                                                                          DATES: Effective April 12, 2017.                      of alloy steel, specifically ‘‘certain
                                                  parties subject to the administrative
                                                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit                carbon and alloy steel hot-rolled or
                                                  protective order (APO) of their
                                                                                                          Astvatsatrian, Office IV, Enforcement &               forged flat plate products not in coils,
                                                  responsibility concerning the return or                 Compliance, International Trade
                                                  destruction of proprietary information                                                                        whether or not painted, varnished, or
                                                                                                          Administration, Department of                         coated with plastics or other non-
                                                  disclosed under the APO in accordance                   Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
                                                  with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which                                                                              metallic substances (cut-to-length
                                                                                                          NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:                 plate).’’ 7 Therefore, the Department is
                                                  continues to govern business                            (202) 482–6412.                                       rescinding the instant circumvention
                                                  proprietary information in this segment                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            inquiry, as this inquiry concerned
                                                  of the proceeding. Timely written
                                                                                                          Background                                            products now covered by the CTL Alloy
                                                  notification of the return or destruction                                                                     Steel Orders.
                                                  of APO materials, or conversion to                         On October 2, 2003, the Department
                                                  judicial protective order, is hereby                    published an antidumping duty order                   Administrative Protective Orders
                                                  requested. Failure to comply with the                   on CTL plate from the PRC.1 On                          This notice also serves as a final
                                                  regulations and the terms of an APO is                  February 10, 2016, in response to a                   reminder to parties subject to an
                                                  a violation subject to sanction.                        request from Nucor Corporation and                    administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
                                                                                                          SSAB Enterprises LLC (collectively,                   of their responsibility concerning the
                                                  Notification to Interested Parties                      ‘‘Domestic Producers’’), the Department               return or destruction of proprietary
                                                     We are issuing and publishing these                  initiated a circumvention inquiry                     information disclosed under APO in
                                                                                                          regarding the Order with respect to                   accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which
                                                  final results and this notice in
                                                                                                          certain CTL plate with small amounts of               continues to govern business
                                                  accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
                                                                                                          specific alloying elements (chromium,                 proprietary information in this segment
                                                  777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR                         titanium, and boron where there was no
                                                  351.213(h).                                                                                                   of the proceeding. Timely written
                                                                                                          heat treatment).2 On December 5, 2016,                notification of the return or destruction
                                                    Dated: April 6, 2017.                                 the Department extended the deadline                  of APO materials, or conversion to
                                                  Ronald K. Lorentzen,                                    for issuing the final determination in                judicial protective order, is hereby
                                                  Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement              this circumvention inquiry until April                requested. Failure to comply with the
                                                  and Compliance.                                         5, 2017.3 Subsequently, on March 20,                  regulations and terms of an APO is a
                                                                                                          2017, the Department published                        violation which is subject to sanction.
                                                  Appendix—Issues in the Decision                         antidumping and countervailing duty
                                                  Memorandum                                              orders on certain carbon and alloy steel              Notification to Interested Parties
                                                  I. Summary                                              CTL plate from the PRC.4 On March 23,                   This notice is issued and published in
                                                  II. Background                                                                                                accordance with sections 781 of the
                                                                                                            1 See Suspension Agreement on Certain Cut-To-
                                                  III. Discussion of the Issues                                                                                 Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
                                                                                                          Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People’s
                                                     Comment 1: Home Market Invoice Dates                 Republic of China; Termination of Suspension
                                                                                                                                                                CFR 351.225.
                                                     Comment 2: Home Market Commissions                   Agreement and Notice of Antidumping Duty Order,         Dated: April 5, 2017.
                                                  IV. Recommendation                                      68 FR 60081 (October 21, 2003) (‘‘Order’’).
                                                                                                            2 See Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate
                                                                                                                                                                Ronald K. Lorentzen,
                                                  [FR Doc. 2017–07364 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am]                                                                   Acting Assistant Secretary, Enforcement and
                                                                                                          From the People ’s Republic of China: Initiation of
                                                  BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  Circumvention Inquiry on Antidumping Duty Order,      Compliance.
                                                                                                          81 FR 8173 (February 18, 2016).                       [FR Doc. 2017–07285 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            3 See Extension of Deadline for Final
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                          Determination for Anticircumvention Inquiry, dated
                                                                                                          December 5, 2016.
                                                                                                            4 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-           5 See Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate

                                                                                                          Length Plate From the People’s Republic of China:     (‘‘CTL plate’’) From the People’s Republic of China
                                                                                                          Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 14349 (March 20,        (‘‘PRC’’): Intent to Rescind Antidumping
                                                                                                          2017); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-   Circumvention Inquiry, dated March 23, 2017
                                                                                                          To-Length Plate From the People’s Republic of         (‘‘Letter of Intent to Rescind’’).
                                                                                                                                                                   6 See id at 2.
                                                                                                          China: Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 14346
                                                                                                          (March 20, 2017) (‘‘CTL Alloy Steel Orders’’).           7 See CTL Alloy Steel Orders.




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:45 Apr 11, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00009   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM   12APN1



Document Created: 2017-04-12 00:23:04
Document Modified: 2017-04-12 00:23:04
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective April 12, 2017.
ContactAndrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4261.
FR Citation82 FR 17631 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR