82 FR 17712 - Program for Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Pursuant to Rule 17d-2; Order Approving and Declaring Effective a Proposed Plan for the Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Between the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and BOX Options Exchange LLC
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 69 (April 12, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 69 (April 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 17712-17714 | |
| FR Document | 2017-07311 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 12, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 17712-17714] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-07311] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-80388; File No. 4-709] Program for Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Pursuant to Rule 17d-2; Order Approving and Declaring Effective a Proposed Plan for the Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Between the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and BOX Options Exchange LLC April 6, 2017. On March 3, 2017, BOX Options Exchange LLC (``BOX'') and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') (collectively, the ``Parties'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') a plan for the allocation of regulatory responsibilities, dated March 2, 2017 (``17d-2 Plan'' or the ``Plan''). The Plan was published for comment on March 21, 2017.\1\ The Commission received no comments on the Plan. This order approves and declares effective the Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80240 (March 14, 2017), 82 FR 14560. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Introduction Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\2\ among other things, requires every self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') registered as either a national securities exchange or national securities association to examine for, and enforce compliance by, its members and persons associated with its members with the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the SRO's own rules, unless the SRO is relieved of this responsibility pursuant to Section 17(d) or Section 19(g)(2) of the Act.\3\ Without this relief, the statutory obligation of each individual SRO could result in a pattern of multiple examinations of broker-dealers that maintain memberships in more than one SRO (``Common Members''). Such regulatory duplication would add unnecessary expenses for common members and their SROs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1). \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(2), respectively. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 17(d)(1) of the Act \4\ was intended, in part, to eliminate unnecessary multiple examinations and regulatory duplication.\5\ With respect to a common member, Section 17(d)(1) authorizes the Commission, by rule or order, to relieve an SRO of the responsibility to receive regulatory reports, to examine for and enforce compliance with applicable statutes, rules, and regulations, or to perform other specified regulatory functions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d)(1). \5\ See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 94-75, 94th Cong., 1st Session 32 (1975). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To implement Section 17(d)(1), the Commission adopted two rules: Rule 17d-1 and Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\6\ Rule 17d-1 authorizes the Commission to name a single SRO as the designated examining authority (``DEA'') to examine common members for compliance with the financial responsibility requirements imposed by the Act, or by Commission or SRO rules.\7\ When an SRO has been named as a common member's DEA, all other SROs to which the common member belongs are relieved of the responsibility to examine the firm for compliance with the applicable financial responsibility rules. On its face, Rule 17d-1 deals only with an SRO's obligations to enforce member compliance with financial responsibility requirements. Rule 17d-1 does not relieve an SRO from its [[Page 17713]] obligation to examine a common member for compliance with its own rules and provisions of the federal securities laws governing matters other than financial responsibility, including sales practices and trading activities and practices. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ 17 CFR 240.17d-1 and 17 CFR 240.17d-2, respectively. \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12352 (April 20, 1976), 41 FR 18808 (May 7, 1976). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To address regulatory duplication in these and other areas, the Commission adopted Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\8\ Rule 17d-2 permits SROs to propose joint plans for the allocation of regulatory responsibilities with respect to their common members. Under paragraph (c) of Rule 17d-2, the Commission may declare such a plan effective if, after providing for appropriate notice and comment, it determines that the plan is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors; to foster cooperation and coordination among the SROs; to remove impediments to, and foster the development of, a national market system and a national clearance and settlement system; and is in conformity with the factors set forth in Section 17(d) of the Act. Commission approval of a plan filed pursuant to Rule 17d-2 relieves an SRO of those regulatory responsibilities allocated by the plan to another SRO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12935 (October 28, 1976), 41 FR 49091 (November 8, 1976). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Proposed Plan The proposed 17d-2 Plan is intended to reduce regulatory duplication for firms that are common members of both BOX and FINRA.\9\ Pursuant to the proposed 17d-2 Plan, FINRA would assume certain examination and enforcement responsibilities for common members with respect to certain applicable laws, rules, and regulations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ The proposed 17d-2 Plan refers to these common members as ``Dual Members.'' See Paragraph 1(c) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The text of the Plan delineates the proposed regulatory responsibilities with respect to the Parties. Included in the proposed Plan is an exhibit (the ``BOX Options Exchange LLC Rules Certification for 17d-2 Agreement with FINRA,'' referred to herein as the ``Certification'') that lists every BOX rule for which FINRA would bear responsibility under the Plan for overseeing and enforcing with respect to BOX members that are also members of FINRA and the associated persons therewith (``Dual Members''). Specifically, under the 17d-2 Plan, FINRA would assume examination and enforcement responsibility relating to compliance by Dual Members with the rules of BOX that are substantially similar to the applicable rules of FINRA \10\ delineated in the Certification (``Common Rules''). In the event that a Dual Member is the subject of an investigation relating to a transaction on BOX, the plan acknowledges that BOX may, in its discretion, exercise concurrent jurisdiction and responsibility for such matter.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See paragraph 1(b) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan (defining Common Rules). See also paragraph 1(f) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan (defining Regulatory Responsibilities). Paragraph 2 of the Plan provides that annually, or more frequently as required by changes in either BOX rules or FINRA rules, the parties shall review and update, if necessary, the list of Common Rules. Further, paragraph 3 of the Plan provides that BOX shall furnish FINRA with a list of Dual Members, and shall update the list no less frequently than once each calendar quarter. \11\ See paragraph 6 of the proposed 17d-2 Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the Plan, BOX would retain full responsibility for surveillance, examination, investigation, and enforcement with respect to trading activities or practices involving BOX's own marketplace, including, without limitation, registration pursuant to its applicable rules of associated persons (i.e., registration rules that are not Common Rules); its duties as a DEA pursuant to Rule 17d-1 under the Act; and any BOX rules that are not Common Rules.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See paragraph 2 of the proposed 17d-2 Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion The Commission finds that the proposed Plan is consistent with the factors set forth in Section 17(d) of the Act \13\ and Rule 17d-2(c) thereunder \14\ in that the proposed Plan is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors, fosters cooperation and coordination among SROs, and removes impediments to and fosters the development of the national market system. In particular, the Commission believes that the proposed Plan should reduce unnecessary regulatory duplication by allocating to FINRA certain examination and enforcement responsibilities for Dual Members that would otherwise be performed by BOX and FINRA. Accordingly, the proposed Plan promotes efficiency by reducing costs to Dual Members. Furthermore, because BOX and FINRA will coordinate their regulatory functions in accordance with the Plan, the Plan should promote investor protection. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d). \14\ 17 CFR 240.17d-2(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission notes that, under the Plan, BOX and FINRA have allocated regulatory responsibility for those BOX rules, set forth in the Certification, that are substantially similar to the applicable FINRA rules in that examination for compliance with such provisions and rules would not require FINRA to develop one or more new examination standards, modules, procedures, or criteria in order to analyze the application of the rule, or a Dual Member's activity, conduct, or output in relation to such rule. The Common Rules covered by the Plan are specifically listed in the Certification, as may be amended by the Parties from time to time. According to the Plan, BOX will review the Certification, at least annually, or more frequently if required by changes in either the rules of BOX or FINRA, and, if necessary, submit to FINRA an updated list of Common Rules to add BOX rules not included on the then-current list of Common Rules that are substantially similar to FINRA rules; delete BOX rules included in the then-current list of Common Rules that are no longer substantially similar to FINRA rules; and confirm that the remaining rules on the list of Common Rules continue to be BOX rules that are substantially similar to FINRA rules.\15\ FINRA will then confirm in writing whether the rules listed in any updated list are Common Rules as defined in the Plan. Under the Plan, BOX will also provide FINRA with a current list of Dual Members and shall update the list no less frequently than once each quarter.\16\ The Commission believes that these provisions are designed to provide for continuing communication between the Parties to ensure the continued accuracy of the scope of the proposed allocation of regulatory responsibility. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See paragraph 2 of the Plan. \16\ See paragraph 3 of the Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission is hereby declaring effective a Plan that, among other things, allocates regulatory responsibility to FINRA for the oversight and enforcement of all BOX rules that are substantially similar to the rules of FINRA for Dual Members of BOX and FINRA. Therefore, modifications to the Certification need not be filed with the Commission as an amendment to the Plan, provided that the Parties are only adding to, deleting from, or confirming changes to BOX rules in the Certification in conformance with the definition of Common Rules provided in the Plan. However, should the Parties decide to add a BOX rule to the Certification that is not substantially similar to a FINRA rule; delete a BOX rule from the Certification that is substantially similar to a FINRA rule; or leave on the Certification a BOX rule that is no longer substantially similar to a FINRA rule, then such a change would constitute an amendment to the Plan, [[Page 17714]] which must be filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ The Commission also notes that the addition to or deletion from the Certification of any federal securities laws, rules, and regulations for which FINRA would bear responsibility under the Plan for examining, and enforcing compliance by, Dual Members, also would constitute an amendment to the Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Conclusion This Order gives effect to the Plan filed with the Commission in File No. 4-709. The Parties shall notify all members affected by the Plan of their rights and obligations under the Plan. It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 17(d) of the Act, that the Plan in File No. 4-709, between FINRA and BOX, filed pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act, is approved and declared effective. It is further ordered, that BOX is relieved of those responsibilities allocated to FINRA under the Plan in File No. 4-709. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(34). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-07311 Filed 4-11-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![17712 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices
31, 2017.12 The Exchange now proposes change that are filed with the I. Introduction
to delay the implementation date to no Commission, and all written Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities
later than May 31, 2017. Waiver of the communications relating to the Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),2 among
30-day operative delay would allow the proposed rule change between the other things, requires every self-
Exchange to immediately extend the Commission and any person, other than regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’)
implementation date and provide those that may be withheld from the registered as either a national securities
additional time for systems testing. The public in accordance with the exchange or national securities
Commission believes that waiving the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be association to examine for, and enforce
30-day operative delay is consistent available for Web site viewing and compliance by, its members and persons
with the protection of investors and the printing in the Commission’s Public associated with its members with the
public interest. Therefore, the Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Act, the rules and regulations
Commission hereby waives the 30-day Washington, DC 20549, on official thereunder, and the SRO’s own rules,
operative delay and designates the business days between the hours of unless the SRO is relieved of this
proposal operative upon filing.13 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the responsibility pursuant to Section 17(d)
At any time within 60 days of the filing also will be available for or Section 19(g)(2) of the Act.3 Without
filing of the proposed rule change, the inspection and copying at the principal this relief, the statutory obligation of
Commission summarily may office of the Exchange. All comments each individual SRO could result in a
temporarily suspend such rule change if received will be posted without change; pattern of multiple examinations of
it appears to the Commission that such the Commission does not edit personal broker-dealers that maintain
action is necessary or appropriate in the identifying information from memberships in more than one SRO
public interest, for the protection of submissions. You should submit only (‘‘Common Members’’). Such regulatory
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of information that you wish to make duplication would add unnecessary
the purposes of the Act. If the available publicly. All submissions expenses for common members and
Commission takes such action, the should refer to File Number SR–BX– their SROs.
Commission shall institute proceedings 2017–018 and should be submitted on Section 17(d)(1) of the Act 4 was
to determine whether the proposed rule or before May 3, 2017. intended, in part, to eliminate
change should be approved or unnecessary multiple examinations and
disapproved. For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated regulatory duplication.5 With respect to
IV. Solicitation of Comments authority.14 a common member, Section 17(d)(1)
Interested persons are invited to Eduardo A. Aleman, authorizes the Commission, by rule or
submit written data, views, and Assistant Secretary. order, to relieve an SRO of the
arguments concerning the foregoing, [FR Doc. 2017–07309 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am]
responsibility to receive regulatory
including whether the proposed rule reports, to examine for and enforce
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
change is consistent with the Act. compliance with applicable statutes,
Comments may be submitted by any of rules, and regulations, or to perform
the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE other specified regulatory functions.
COMMISSION To implement Section 17(d)(1), the
Electronic Comments Commission adopted two rules: Rule
• Use the Commission’s Internet 17d–1 and Rule 17d–2 under the Act.6
[Release No. 34–80388; File No. 4–709] Rule 17d–1 authorizes the Commission
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or Program for Allocation of Regulatory to name a single SRO as the designated
• Send an email to rule-comments@ Responsibilities Pursuant to Rule 17d– examining authority (‘‘DEA’’) to
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 2; Order Approving and Declaring examine common members for
BX–2017–018 on the subject line. Effective a Proposed Plan for the compliance with the financial
Allocation of Regulatory responsibility requirements imposed by
Paper Comments the Act, or by Commission or SRO
Responsibilities Between the Financial
• Send paper comments in triplicate rules.7 When an SRO has been named as
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities a common member’s DEA, all other
BOX Options Exchange LLC
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street SROs to which the common member
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. April 6, 2017. belongs are relieved of the responsibility
All submissions should refer to File to examine the firm for compliance with
On March 3, 2017, BOX Options
Number SR–BX–2017–018. This file the applicable financial responsibility
Exchange LLC (‘‘BOX’’) and the
number should be included on the rules. On its face, Rule 17d–1 deals only
Financial Industry Regulatory
subject line if email is used. To help the with an SRO’s obligations to enforce
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) (collectively,
Commission process and review your member compliance with financial
the ‘‘Parties’’) filed with the Securities
comments more efficiently, please use responsibility requirements. Rule 17d–1
and Exchange Commission
only one method. The Commission will does not relieve an SRO from its
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) a plan for the
post all comments on the Commission’s
allocation of regulatory responsibilities,
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 2 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1).
dated March 2, 2017 (‘‘17d–2 Plan’’ or 3 15 U.S.C. 78q(d) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(2),
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
the ‘‘Plan’’). The Plan was published for respectively.
submission, all subsequent
comment on March 21, 2017.1 The
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
4 15 U.S.C. 78q(d)(1).
amendments, all written statements
Commission received no comments on 5 See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Report
with respect to the proposed rule of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and
the Plan. This order approves and
Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 94–
12 See
declares effective the Plan. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Session 32 (1975).
supra note 6.
13 For 6 17 CFR 240.17d–1 and 17 CFR 240.17d–2,
purposes only of waiving the 30-day
14 17CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). respectively.
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, 1 SeeSecurities Exchange Act Release No. 80240 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12352
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). (March 14, 2017), 82 FR 14560. (April 20, 1976), 41 FR 18808 (May 7, 1976).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:45 Apr 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM 12APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17781/page/1.svg)
![17714 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices
which must be filed with the connection with business combination SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Commission pursuant to Rule 17d–2 transactions. The purpose of the rule is COMMISSION
under the Act.17 to permit more oral and written
[Release No. 34–80391; File No. SR–
IV. Conclusion communications with shareholders NASDAQ–2017–034]
about tender offers, mergers and other
This Order gives effect to the Plan business combination transactions on a Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
filed with the Commission in File No. more timely basis, so long as the written NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
4–709. The Parties shall notify all Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
communications are filed on the date of
members affected by the Plan of their Proposed Rule Change To Extend the
first use. Approximately 7,160 issuers
rights and obligations under the Plan. Implementation Date of Its
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to file communications under Rule 425 at
an estimated 0.25 hours per response for Functionality Relating to Midpoint Peg
Section 17(d) of the Act, that the Plan Post-Only Orders and Orders With
in File No. 4–709, between FINRA and a total of 1,790 annual burden hours
(0.25 hours per response × 7,160 Midpoint Pegging
BOX, filed pursuant to Rule 17d–2
under the Act, is approved and declared responses). April 6, 2017.
effective. Written comments are invited on: (a) Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
It is further ordered, that BOX is Whether the collection of information is Securities Exchange Act of 1934
relieved of those responsibilities necessary for the proper performance of (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
allocated to FINRA under the Plan in the functions of the agency, including notice is hereby given that on March 31,
File No. 4–709. whether the information will have 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
For the Commission, by the Division of practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated agency’s estimate of the burden imposed Securities and Exchange Commission
authority.18 (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
by the collection of information; (c)
rule change as described in Items I and
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
Eduardo A. Aleman, II below, which Items have been
clarity of the information collected; and prepared by the Exchange. The
Assistant Secretary. (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
[FR Doc. 2017–07311 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am] Commission is publishing this notice to
collection of information on solicit comments on the proposed rule
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P respondents, including through the use change from interested persons.
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Statement of the Terms of Substance of
COMMISSION Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in the Proposed Rule Change
Proposed Collection; Comment writing within 60 days of this The Exchange proposes to extend the
Request publication. implementation date of its functionality
relating to Midpoint Peg Post-Only
Upon Written Request Copies Available An agency may not conduct or
Orders and Orders with Midpoint
From: Securities and Exchange sponsor, and a person is not required to Pegging.
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, respond to, a collection of information There is no rule text for this proposed
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC unless it displays a currently valid rule change.
20549–2736 control number.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Extension: Please direct your written comment to Statement of the Purpose of, and
Rule 425, [OMB Control No. 3235–0521, Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
SEC File No. 270–462] Information Officer, Securities and Change
Notice is hereby given, that pursuant Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-
In its filing with the Commission, the
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
Exchange included statements
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_
concerning the purpose of and basis for
and Exchange Commission Mailbox@sec.gov.
the proposed rule change and discussed
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments Dated: April 6, 2017. any comments it received on the
on the collection of information proposed rule change. The text of these
Eduardo A. Aleman,
summarized below. The Commission statements may be examined at the
plans to submit this existing collection Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–07301 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am]
places specified in Item IV below. The
of information to the Office of Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Management and Budget for extension BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
and approval. the most significant aspects of such
Rule 425 (17 CFR 230.425) under the
statements.
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.) requires the filing of certain A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
prospectuses and communications Statement of the Purpose of, and
under Rule 135 (17 CFR 230.135) and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Rule 165 (17 CFR 230.165) in Change
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
17 The Commission also notes that the addition to
1. Purpose
or deletion from the Certification of any federal Nasdaq is filing this proposal to
securities laws, rules, and regulations for which extend the implementation date of its
FINRA would bear responsibility under the Plan for
examining, and enforcing compliance by, Dual functionality relating to Midpoint Peg
Members, also would constitute an amendment to
the Plan. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(34). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:45 Apr 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM 12APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17781/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-12 00:23:34
Document Modified: 2017-04-12 00:23:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 17712 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR