82 FR 17768 - Emergency Preparedness for Small Modular Reactors and Other New Technologies
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 70 (April 13, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 70 (April 13, 2017)
| Page Range | 17768-17770 | |
| FR Document | 2017-07502 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 70 (Thursday, April 13, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 17768-17770] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-07502] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules [[Page 17768]] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 50 and 52 [Docket No. NRC-2015-0225] RIN 3150-AJ68 Emergency Preparedness for Small Modular Reactors and Other New Technologies AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft regulatory basis; public meeting, and request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting comment on a draft regulatory basis to support a rulemaking that would develop new emergency preparedness (EP) requirements for small modular reactors (SMRs) and other new technologies (ONTs), such as non-light- water reactors (non-LWRs) and medical isotope production facilities. The new EP regulations would be consequence-oriented, performance- based, and technology inclusive to the extent possible, and continue to provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety. The new EP regulations would be applicable to SMR and ONT facilities only. Large light-water reactors (LWRs), fuel cycle facilities, research and test reactors and other non-power, non- commercial, facilities are not in the scope of this rulemaking. The NRC plans to hold a public meeting to promote full understanding of the rulemaking and facilitate public participation. DATES: Submit comments by June 27, 2017. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0225. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Email comments to: [email protected]. If you do not receive an automatic email reply confirming receipt, then contact us at 301-415-1677. Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301-415-1101. Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (Eastern Time) Federal workdays; telephone: 301-415-1677. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Carrera, Office of New Reactors, telephone: 301-415-1078, email: [email protected]; and Arlon Costa, Office of New Reactors, telephone: 301-415-6402, email: [email protected]. Both are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0225 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods: Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0225. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The draft regulatory basis document is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16309A332. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0225 in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS. II. Discussion The NRC is requesting comments on a draft regulatory basis to support a rulemaking that would amend part 50 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,'' and part 52, ``Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants,'' by adopting new EP regulations for SMR and ONT licensees. The specific objectives of this rulemaking effort are to establish new EP requirements for SMR and ONT licensees that will recognize: (1) Distance to which planning for initiation of predetermined protective actions is warranted, (2) time-dependent [[Page 17769]] characteristics of potential releases and exposures, and (3) isotopic characteristics of radioactive materials that can potentially be released to the environment. The scope of the draft regulatory basis includes EP for new SMR and ONT facilities licensed under 10 CFR parts 50 and 52. Under current regulations for large LWR designs, the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ) size is about 10 miles (16 kilometers). However, SMRs and ONTs may have comparatively smaller reactor core size and also include passive design safety features, which result in potential accident releases and offsite radiation dose consequences that are smaller and may be delayed when compared to large LWRs. To account for this difference as compared to large LWRs, the NRC plans to develop a consequence-oriented, performance-based, and technology inclusive approach to EP for these SMR and ONT designs. With the proposed adoption of an approach for these designs where the plume exposure pathway EPZ size is scalable in proportion with potential accident consequences, the potential exists for this EPZ to be contained within the site boundary. The draft regulatory basis, in part, explains why the NRC believes the existing regulations should be updated, revised, and enhanced; presents alternatives to rulemaking; and discusses costs and other impacts of the potential changes. III. Specific Requests for Comments The NRC is seeking comments and supporting rationale from the public on the following questions: Scope of Draft Regulatory Basis Is the NRC considering an appropriate approach for each objective described in the draft regulatory basis? Section 3 of the draft regulatory basis discusses the regulatory concerns the NRC expects to address through rulemaking. Section 4 presents the intended regulatory changes to address those regulatory concerns, and also discusses alternatives to rulemaking considered by the NRC. Are there other regulatory concerns within or related to the scope of the rulemaking efforts (see Section 4) that the NRC should consider? Are there other approaches or alternatives the NRC should consider to resolve those regulatory concerns? Are there any other alternatives for EP for SMRs and ONTs to address beyond those discussed in the draft regulatory basis that the NRC should consider? Are there other EP related issues that the NRC staff should consider in further developing this regulatory basis? Is the scope of facilities to be included under the ONT umbrella (see Section 1.1) appropriate or can you suggest additions or deletions? Performance-Based Approach What are the benefits of a performance-based EP approach, other than those described in the draft regulatory basis? Should the NRC continue research to establish performance- based criteria specific for SMRs and ONTs in the EP area? Examples of such research that has been performed are discussed in SECY-14-0038, ``Performance-Based Framework for Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness Oversight,'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML14259A589). Is it appropriate to establish combined risk-informed and performance-based criteria, and can you suggest EP areas or methods where they could successfully be implemented? Regulatory Impacts Section 5 of the draft regulatory basis presents the NRC's initial consideration of costs and other impacts for a number of key aspects of the potential regulatory changes. This initial assessment is based on limited available data. The NRC is seeking additional data and input relative to expected and/or unintentional impacts from the desired regulatory changes. What would be the potential impacts to stakeholders, such as applicants, licensees, and the public, from implementing any of the desired regulatory changes described in this draft regulatory basis? We are also seeking comments on reasonable cost estimates for implementation of the EP for SMRs and ONTs regulations, including one-time startup cost and annual cost? What would the cost be for 10 CFR part 52 licensees to be licensed under the proposed performance-based EP approach? What would be the cost difference between this new EP approach and the current EP approach in 10 CFR part 50? What impacts, other than cost, would result from the rulemaking action under consideration? IV. Cumulative Effects of Regulation The cumulative effects of regulation (CER) describes the challenges that licensees or other impacted entities (such as State agency partners, Tribal and local governments) may face while implementing new regulatory positions, programs, and requirements (e.g., rules, generic letters, backfits, inspections). The CER is an organizational challenge that results from a licensee or impacted entity implementing a number of complex positions, programs, or requirements within a limited implementation period and with available resources (which may include limited available expertise to address a specific issue). The NRC has implemented CER enhancements to the rulemaking process to facilitate public involvement throughout the rulemaking process. Therefore, the NRC is specifically requesting comments on the cumulative effects that may result from this proposed rulemaking. In developing comments on the draft regulatory basis, consider and provide comments on the following questions: 1. In light of any current or projected CER challenges, what should be a reasonable effective date, compliance date, or submittal date(s) from the time the final rule is published to the actual implementation of any proposed requirements, including changes to programs, procedures, and the facility? 2. If CER challenges currently exist or are expected, what should be done to address them? For example, if more time is required for subsequent implementation of the new requirements, what period of time is sufficient? 3. Do other (NRC or other agency) regulatory actions (e.g., orders, generic communications, license amendment requests, and inspection findings of a generic nature) influence the subsequent implementation of the proposed rule's requirements? 4. Are there unintended consequences? Does the draft regulatory basis create conditions that would be contrary to the draft regulatory basis' purpose and objectives? If so, what are the unintended consequences, and how should they be addressed? V. Availability of Documents The NRC may post documents related to this rulemaking activity to the Federal rulemaking Web site at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: NRC-2015-0225. The Federal rulemaking Web site allows you to receive alerts when changes or additions occur in a docket folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket folder (NRC-2015-0225); (2) click the ``Sign up for Email Alerts'' link; and (3) enter your email address and select how frequently you would like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or monthly). VI. Plain Writing The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) requires Federal [[Page 17770]] agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, and well-organized manner. The NRC has written this document to be consistent with the Plain Writing Act as well as the Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain Language in Government Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883). The NRC requests comment on this document with respect to the clarity and effectiveness of the language used. VII. Public Meeting The NRC plans to hold a public meeting during the public comment period for this notice. The public meeting will provide a forum for the NRC staff to discuss the issues and questions with external stakeholders regarding the draft regulatory basis to add new EP requirements for SMRs and ONTs. The NRC does not intend to provide detailed responses to comments or other information submitted during the public meeting. The public meeting will be noticed on the NRC's public meeting Web site at least 10 calendar days before the meeting. Stakeholders should monitor the NRC's Public Meeting Schedule Web page for additional information about the public meeting at http://meetings.nrc.gov/pmns/mtg. The NRC will post a notice for the public meeting and may post additional material related to this action to the Federal rulemaking Web site at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2015-0225. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of March 2017. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Robert K. Caldwell, Acting Director, Division of Engineering and Infrastructure, Office of New Reactors. [FR Doc. 2017-07502 Filed 4-12-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![17768
Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 70
Thursday, April 13, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER for Docket ID NRC–2015–0225. Address adams.html. To begin the search, select
contains notices to the public of the proposed questions about NRC dockets to Carol ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
issuance of rules and regulations. The Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
purpose of these notices is to give interested email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
persons an opportunity to participate in the technical questions, contact the please contact the NRC’s Public
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
rules.
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
document. email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft
NUCLEAR REGULATORY • Email comments to: regulatory basis document is available
COMMISSION Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you in ADAMS under Accession No.
do not receive an automatic email reply ML16309A332.
10 CFR Parts 50 and 52 confirming receipt, then contact us at • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
301–415–1677. purchase copies of public documents at
[Docket No. NRC–2015–0225]
• Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
RIN 3150–AJ68 Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301– White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
415–1101. Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Emergency Preparedness for Small • Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. B. Submitting Comments
Modular Reactors and Other New Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Technologies Washington, DC 20555–001, ATTN: Please include Docket ID NRC–2015–
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 0225 in your comment submission.
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory The NRC cautions you not to include
• Hand deliver comments to: 11555
Commission. identifying or contact information that
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852,
ACTION: Draft regulatory basis; public you do not want to be publicly
between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
meeting, and request for comment. disclosed in your comment submission.
(Eastern Time) Federal workdays;
The NRC will post all comment
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory telephone: 301–415–1677. submissions at http://
Commission (NRC) is requesting For additional direction on obtaining www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment on a draft regulatory basis to information and submitting comments, comment submissions into ADAMS.
support a rulemaking that would see ‘‘Obtaining Information and The NRC does not routinely edit
develop new emergency preparedness Submitting Comments’’ in the comment submissions to remove
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
(EP) requirements for small modular identifying or contact information.
reactors (SMRs) and other new this document. If you are requesting or aggregating
technologies (ONTs), such as non-light- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: comments from other persons for
water reactors (non-LWRs) and medical Andrew Carrera, Office of New Reactors, submission to the NRC, then you should
isotope production facilities. The new telephone: 301–415–1078, email: inform those persons not to include
EP regulations would be consequence- Andrew.Carrera@nrc.gov; and Arlon identifying or contact information that
oriented, performance-based, and Costa, Office of New Reactors, they do not want to be publicly
technology inclusive to the extent telephone: 301–415–6402, email: disclosed in their comment submission.
possible, and continue to provide Arlon.Costa@nrc.gov. Both are staff of Your request should state that the NRC
reasonable assurance of adequate the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory does not routinely edit comment
protection of public health and safety. Commission, Washington, DC 20555– submissions to remove such information
The new EP regulations would be 0001. before making the comment
applicable to SMR and ONT facilities SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
submissions available to the public or
only. Large light-water reactors (LWRs), entering the comment into ADAMS.
fuel cycle facilities, research and test I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments II. Discussion
reactors and other non-power, non-
commercial, facilities are not in the The NRC is requesting comments on
A. Obtaining Information a draft regulatory basis to support a
scope of this rulemaking. The NRC
plans to hold a public meeting to Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015– rulemaking that would amend part 50 of
promote full understanding of the 0225 when contacting the NRC about title 10 of the Code of Federal
rulemaking and facilitate public the availability of information for this Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Domestic
participation. action. You may obtain publicly- Licensing of Production and Utilization
available information related to this Facilities,’’ and part 52, ‘‘Licenses,
DATES: Submit comments by June 27, action by any of the following methods: Certifications, and Approvals for
2017. Comments received after this date • Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to Nuclear Power Plants,’’ by adopting new
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
will be considered if it is practical to do http://www.regulations.gov and search EP regulations for SMR and ONT
so, but the Commission is able to ensure for Docket ID NRC–2015–0225. licensees. The specific objectives of this
consideration only for comments • NRC’s Agencywide Documents rulemaking effort are to establish new
received on or before this date. Access and Management System EP requirements for SMR and ONT
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly- licensees that will recognize: (1)
by any of the following methods: available documents online in the Distance to which planning for
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to ADAMS Public Documents collection at initiation of predetermined protective
http://www.regulations.gov and search http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ actions is warranted, (2) time-dependent
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:43 Apr 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM 13APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17838/page/1.svg)
![17770 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
agencies to write documents in a clear, 10, for all Airbus Model A318, A319, be available in the AD docket shortly
concise, and well-organized manner. A320, and A321 series airplanes. AD after receipt.
The NRC has written this document to 2014–26–10 currently requires revising FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
be consistent with the Plain Writing Act the maintenance or inspection program Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
as well as the Presidential to incorporate maintenance International Branch, ANM–116,
Memorandum, ‘‘Plain Language in requirements and airworthiness Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
Government Writing,’’ published June limitations. Since we issued AD 2014– 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
10, 1998 (63 FR 31883). The NRC 26–10, we have determined that more 98057–3356; telephone: 425–227–1405;
requests comment on this document restrictive maintenance instructions and fax: 425–227–1149.
with respect to the clarity and airworthiness limitations are necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
effectiveness of the language used. This proposed AD would require
revising the maintenance or inspection Comments Invited
VII. Public Meeting
program, as applicable, to incorporate We invite you to send any written
The NRC plans to hold a public new or revised airworthiness limitation relevant data, views, or arguments about
meeting during the public comment requirements. This proposed AD also this proposed AD. Send your comments
period for this notice. The public removes airplanes from the to an address listed under the
meeting will provide a forum for the applicability. We are proposing this AD ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
NRC staff to discuss the issues and to address the unsafe condition on these FAA–2017–0248; Directorate Identifier
questions with external stakeholders products. 2016–NM–088–AD’’ at the beginning of
regarding the draft regulatory basis to DATES: We must receive comments on your comments. We specifically invite
add new EP requirements for SMRs and this proposed AD by May 30, 2017. comments on the overall regulatory,
ONTs. The NRC does not intend to
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, economic, environmental, and energy
provide detailed responses to comments
using the procedures found in 14 CFR aspects of this proposed AD. We will
or other information submitted during
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following consider all comments received by the
the public meeting.
methods: closing date and may amend this
The public meeting will be noticed on
the NRC’s public meeting Web site at • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to proposed AD based on those comments.
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the We will post all comments we
least 10 calendar days before the
instructions for submitting comments. receive, without change, to http://
meeting. Stakeholders should monitor
• Fax: 202–493–2251. www.regulations.gov, including any
the NRC’s Public Meeting Schedule Web
• Mail: U.S. Department of personal information you provide. We
page for additional information about
Transportation, Docket Operations, M– will also post a report summarizing each
the public meeting at http://
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room substantive verbal contact we receive
meetings.nrc.gov/pmns/mtg.
The NRC will post a notice for the W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., about this proposed AD.
public meeting and may post additional Washington, DC 20590.
Discussion
material related to this action to the • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5 On December 19, 2014, we issued AD
Federal rulemaking Web site at
p.m., Monday through Friday, except 2014–26–10, Amendment 39–18061 (80
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
Federal holidays. FR 2813, January 21, 2015) (‘‘AD 2014–
NRC–2015–0225.
For service information identified in 26–10’’), for all Airbus Model A318,
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day this NPRM, contact Airbus, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes.
of March 2017. Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond AD 2014–26–10 was prompted by a
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac determination that the maintenance
Robert K. Caldwell, Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 actions for airplane systems susceptible
Acting Director, Division of Engineering and 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email: to aging must be mandated. AD 2014–
Infrastructure, Office of New Reactors. account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; 26–10 requires revising the maintenance
[FR Doc. 2017–07502 Filed 4–12–17; 8:45 am] Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You or inspection program to incorporate
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P may view this referenced service maintenance requirements and
information at the FAA, Transport airworthiness limitations. We issued AD
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 2014–26–10 to mitigate the risks
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SW., Renton, WA. For information on associated with aging effects of airplane
the availability of this material at the systems. Such aging effects could
Federal Aviation Administration FAA, call 425–227–1221. change the characteristics of the systems
leading to an increased potential for
14 CFR Part 39 Examining the AD Docket failure, which could result in failure of
You may examine the AD docket on certain life-limited parts, and reduced
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0248; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NM–088–AD] the Internet at http:// structural integrity or reduced
www.regulations.gov by searching for controllability of the airplane.
RIN 2120–AA64 and locating Docket No. FAA–2017– Since we issued AD 2014–26–10, we
0248; or in person at the Docket have determined that more restrictive
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Management Facility between 9 a.m. maintenance instructions and
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Airplanes and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, airworthiness limitations are necessary.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation except Federal holidays. The AD docket The European Aviation Safety Agency
Administration (FAA), DOT. contains this proposed AD, the (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking regulatory evaluation, any comments for the Member States of the European
(NPRM). received, and other information. The Union, has issued EASA AD 2016–0093,
street address for the Docket Operations dated May 13, 2016 (referred to after
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede office (telephone: 800–647–5527) is in this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014–26– the ADDRESSES section. Comments will Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:43 Apr 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM 13APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_17838/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-04-13 01:09:22
Document Modified: 2017-04-13 01:09:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Draft regulatory basis; public meeting, and request for comment. | |
| Dates | Submit comments by June 27, 2017. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. | |
| Contact | Andrew Carrera, Office of New Reactors, telephone: 301-415-1078, email: [email protected]; and Arlon Costa, Office of New Reactors, telephone: 301-415-6402, email: [email protected] Both are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 17768 | |
| RIN Number | 3150-AJ68 | |
| CFR Citation | 10
CFR
50 10 CFR 52 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR