82 FR 17887 - Exemption Request for Waste Control Specialists LLC; Andrews County, Texas

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 70 (April 13, 2017)

Page Range		17887-17890
FR Document		2017-07505
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) in support of the NRC's consideration of issuance of a new 2017 order that would supersede an order previously issued to Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS) on December 3, 2014 (2014 Order). The 2014 Order contained conditions and criteria that allowed WCS to be exempt from the NRC's regulations concerning special nuclear material (SNM).
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 70 (Thursday, April 13, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 70 (Thursday, April 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17887-17890]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 70-7005; NRC-2017-0098]


Exemption Request for Waste Control Specialists LLC; Andrews 
County, Texas

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; 
issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an 
environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact 
(FONSI) in support of the NRC's consideration of issuance of a new 2017 
order that would supersede an order previously issued to Waste Control 
Specialists LLC (WCS) on December 3, 2014 (2014 Order). The 2014 Order 
contained conditions and criteria that allowed WCS to be exempt from 
the NRC's regulations concerning special nuclear material (SNM).

DATES: The EA and FONSI are available as of April 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0098 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may access publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0098. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 
of this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available 
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in this 
document.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Park, Office of Nuclear Material 
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington 
DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6954; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    The current action is in response to WCS's December 4, 2014, 
request for an exemption from NRC regulations to transfer aboveground, 
under specified conditions, wastes containing SNM in excess of the 
critical mass limits specified in section 150.11 of title 10 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations (10

[[Page 17888]]

CFR), ``Critical Mass,'' at its Andrews County, Texas, facility, 
without first obtaining from the NRC a 10 CFR part 70 license.
    The WCS operates a facility in Andrews County, Texas, (WCS site) 
that is currently licensed by Texas to receive, possess, use, store, 
dispose and transfer certain types of radioactive material contained in 
Low-Level Waste (LLW) and Mixed Waste (MW) (i.e., waste that is both 
hazardous waste and LLW). The WCS site also receives hazardous and 
toxic waste for disposal. Under an Agreement authorized by the Atomic 
Energy Act, as amended, the NRC can relinquish and a State can assume, 
regulatory authority over radioactive material specified in an 
Agreement with the NRC. In 1963, Texas entered into an Agreement and 
assumed regulatory authority over source, byproduct, and SNM less than 
a critical mass.
    On November 30, 1997, the State of Texas Department of Health (TDH) 
issued WCS a radioactive materials license (RML) to possess, treat, and 
store LLW (RML R04971). In 1997, WCS began accepting Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act and Toxic Substance Control Act wastes 
for treatment, storage, and disposal. Later that year, WCS received a 
license from the TDH for treatment and storage of MW and LLW. The MW 
and LLW streams may contain quantities of SNM. In 2007, regulatory 
responsibility for RML R04971 was transferred by TDH to the Texas 
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). In September 2009, the TCEQ 
issued RML R04100 to WCS for disposal of LLW.
    Section 70.3 of 10 CFR part 70 requires persons who own, acquire, 
deliver, receive, possess, use, or transfer SNM to obtain a license 
pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR part 70, ``Domestic Licensing of 
Special Nuclear Material.'' The licensing requirements in 10 CFR part 
70 apply to persons in Agreement States possessing greater than 
critical mass quantities, as defined in 10 CFR 150.11, ``Critical 
Mass.'' However, the Commission may grant exemptions from the 
requirements of specific regulations pursuant to 10 CFR 70.17(a), if 
the Commission determines the exemptions are ``authorized by law and 
will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security 
and are otherwise in the public interest.''
    In September 2000, WCS submitted to the NRC an exemption request 
from the licensing requirements in 10 CFR part 70. On November 21, 
2001, the NRC issued an Order to WCS (2001 Order) granting an exemption 
to WCS from certain NRC regulations and permitted WCS, under specified 
conditions, to possess waste containing SNM in greater quantities than 
specified in 10 CFR part 150, ``Exemptions and Continued Regulatory 
Authority in Agreement States and in Offshore Waters under Section 
274,'' at the WCS Site without obtaining an NRC license pursuant to 10 
CFR part 70. The NRC published the 2001 Order in the Federal Register 
(FR) on November 15, 2001 (66 FR 57489). The publicly available 
November 21, 2001, NRC letter to WCS (ADAMS Accession No. ML030130085), 
included as attachments the 2001 Order, the October 2001 EA, and the 
November 2001 Safety Evaluation Report (SER). The EA discussed the 
conditions specified in the 2001 Order.
    By letters dated August 6, 2003, and March 14, 2004, WCS requested 
a modification to the 2001 Order to allow it to use additional reagents 
for chemical stabilization of mixed waste containing SNM. The NRC 
issued the new Order on November 4, 2004 (2004 Order), which superseded 
the 2001 Order. The NRC published the 2004 Order in the FR on November 
12, 2004 (69 FR 65468). The October 2004 EA (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML043020614) and October 2004 SER (ADAMS Accession No. ML042250362) 
discussed the new conditions specified in the 2004 Order. The 2004 
Order allowed WCS to use such chemical reagents as it deems necessary 
for treatment and stabilization of mixed waste containing SNM, provided 
that the SNM mass does not exceed specified concentration limits.
    By letter dated December 10, 2007, WCS requested modifications to 
the 2004 Order. The NRC issued the new Order to WCS on October 29, 2009 
(2009 Order), which superseded the 2004 Order. The NRC published the 
2009 Order in the FR on October 26, 2009 (74 FR 55072). The October 
2009 EA (ADAMS Accession No. ML092460509) and October 2009 SER (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML093070307) discussed the new conditions specified in 
the 2009 Order. The 2009 Order changed the 2004 Order Conditions 
regarding sampling of waste, what is allowed to be in the waste, and 
the amount of highly water soluble SNM in each waste package.
    In July 2013, the TCEQ began to merge the license requirements in 
RML R04971 (for the radioactive waste treatment, storage, and 
processing facility) with the requirements in RML R04100 (for the LLW 
land disposal facility). In Amendment No. 22 of RML R04100, the TCEQ 
license requirements related to the 2009 Order in RML R04971 for the 
WCS treatment, storage, and processing facility were transferred to RML 
R04100. Previous NRC Orders referred to that location as the treatment, 
storage, and processing facility. Subsequently, WCS began referring to 
that location as the ``Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility.'' The 
NRC will use the name ``Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility'' and 
the abbreviation TSDF to reference that location at the WCS Site in 
this EA.
    By letter dated July 18, 2014, WCS requested modifications to the 
2009 Order to allow movement to and temporary storage of some of the 
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Waste at the WCS Federal Waste 
Disposal Facility (FWF) rather than at the TSDF. The LANL Waste is U.S. 
Department of Energy (DOE) waste that originated at the LANL that is 
destined for disposal at the DOE Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) 
Facility. Due to the February 14, 2014, WIPP incident, the DOE 
suspended operations at the WIPP Facility. In April 2014, WCS began 
receiving some LANL Waste from DOE that met the conditions in the 2009 
Order and WCS began storing the waste at the TSDF. The NRC issued the 
2014 Order to WCS on December 11, 2014, which superseded the 2009 
Order. The NRC published the 2014 Order in the FR on December 11, 2014 
(79 FR 73647), allowing temporary storage of some of the LANL Waste at 
the WCS FWF. The October 2014 EA (ADAMS Accession No. ML14238A208) and 
November 2014 SER (ADAMS Accession No. ML14230A804) discussed the new 
conditions specified in the 2014 Order.
    The previous NRC Orders (2001, 2004, 2009, and 2014) addressed the 
issue that 10 CFR 70.3 requires persons who own, acquire, deliver, 
receive, possess, use, or transfer SNM to obtain an NRC license 
pursuant to the requirements in 10 CFR part 70. However, 10 CFR 150.10 
exempts a person in an Agreement State who possesses SNM in quantities 
not sufficient to form a critical mass from the NRC's imposed licensing 
requirements and regulations. The method for calculating the quantity 
of SNM not sufficient to form a critical mass is set out in 10 CFR 
150.11. Therefore, prior to the 2001 Order, WCS was required to comply 
with NRC regulatory requirements and obtain an NRC specific license to 
possess SNM in quantities greater than amounts established in 10 CFR 
150.11. The 2001 WCS exemption request to NRC proposed to use 
concentration-based limits rather than mass-based limits at a specific 
location at the WCS Site. The 2001 Order granted, and the subsequent

[[Page 17889]]

NRC Orders (2004, 2009, and 2014) continued the use of concentration-
based limits and other conditions at specific locations at the WCS 
Site. The TCEQ incorporated the concentration-based limits and other 
conditions from each respective NRC Order (2001, 2004, 2009, and 2014) 
into the WCS license for the specific locations at the WCS Site where 
the concentration-based limits instead of mass-based limits and other 
conditions are applicable.

II. Environmental Assessment

Description of the Proposed Action

    By letter dated December 4, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14342A773), 
WCS requested an exemption from NRC regulations to possess SNM in 
excess of the critical mass limits specified in 10 CFR 150.11 while 
performing specific transfers aboveground at the WCS Site, without 
first obtaining a 10 CFR part 70 license. Through subsequent public 
interactions between the NRC and WCS, the WCS request was revised to 
allow transfer of waste from off-site the WCS Site directly to either 
the Compact Waste Facility (CWF) or the FWF, only for disposal (Direct 
Transfer), without the waste being applied towards the aboveground SNM 
possession limit for the WCS Site. Pursuant to the NRC proposed 
conditions in the 2017 Order: (1) WCS would continue to possess waste 
when it enters the WCS-owned rail spur (for rail shipments) or when it 
enters the WCS Site (for truck shipments); (2) for Direct Transfers, 
waste would not apply towards the aboveground SNM possession limit 
until it is removed from the rail car (for rail shipments) or removed 
from the truck (for truck shipments); and (3) for Direct Transfers, 
waste would not be processed, treated, or stored at the WCS Site. The 
NRC used the concept of Criticality Safety Index (CSI) as the safety 
basis to support the NRC proposed conditions in the 2017 Order. All 
aboveground waste containing SNM possessed by WCS would apply towards 
the aboveground SNM possession limit, except waste meeting the Direct 
Transfer proposed conditions in the 2017 Order.
    The NRC staff evaluated the three types of Direct Transfers:
     Off-site containerized waste that arrives by truck and 
sent directly to the CWF only for disposal;
     Off-site containerized waste that arrives by truck and 
sent directly to the FWF only for disposal; and
     Off-site bulk waste that arrives by truck and sent 
directly to the FWF only for disposal.
    The following factors informed the NRC's evaluation of the proposed 
action:
     The concept of CSI is discussed in 10 CFR part 71, 
``Packaging and Transport of Radioactive Material.'' The provisions in 
10 CFR part 71 regulate the packaging, preparation for shipment, and 
transportation of radioactive material on public roadways.
     10 CFR 71.4 defines CSI as: ``the dimensionless number 
(rounded up to the next tenth) assigned to and placed on the label of a 
fissile material package, to designate the degree of control of 
accumulation of packages, overpacks, or freight containers containing 
fissile material during transportation. Determination of the CSI is 
described in 10 CFR 71.22, 71.23, and 71.59. The CSI for an overpack, 
freight container, consignment, or conveyance containing fissile 
material packages is the arithmetic sum of the CSIs of all the fissile 
material packages contained within the overpack, freight container, 
consignment, or conveyance.''
     The NRC Glossary found at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary.html, defines Fissile Material as: ``A nuclide that 
is capable of undergoing fission after capturing low-energy thermal 
(slow) neutrons . . . .''
     10 CFR 71.22(a) includes: ``A general license is issued to 
any licensee of the Commission to transport fissile material, or to 
deliver fissile material to a carrier for transport if the material is 
shipped in accordance with this section.'' Other provisions in the 
regulation specify the CSIs for individual packages and for the 
shipments of multiple packages. Section 71.22(d)(3) specifically 
includes: ``For a shipment of multiple packages containing fissile 
material, the sum of the CSIs must be less than or equal to 50 (for 
shipment on a nonexclusive use conveyance) . . . .''
     Use of the CSI of 50 from 10 CFR part 71 for the safe 
transportation of radioactive material on public roads provides 
adequate safety for direct transfers at the WCS Site.
     The definition of ``conveyance'' in 10 CFR 71.4 includes: 
``For transport by public highway or rail any transport vehicle or 
freight container . . . .''
     A transportation package is a container placed on or in a 
conveyance. A transportation package can contain one or more waste 
packages.
     A waste package is a container with waste that was placed 
inside a transportation package.
     For this modified request, the concept of CSI only applies 
to transportation packages.
     The SNM contained in either a transportation package or a 
waste package that meets the NRC proposed conditions in the 2017 Order 
do not apply towards the aboveground SNM possession limit at the WCS 
Site. Otherwise, that SNM does apply towards the aboveground SNM 
possession limit at the WCS Site.
     When waste is removed from a railcar at the WCS Site, the 
SNM contained in that waste does apply towards the aboveground SNM 
possession limit at the WCS Site.
    Under the modified request, the Direct Transfers would only occur 
on appropriately dedicated secure access roads, with conveyances 
travelling to either the CWF or the FWF under the 25 miles per hour 
speed limit. Additionally, Direct Transfers would be escorted by at 
least two radiation safety technicians and two waste acceptance 
personnel, with entrances to the access roads blocked for a distance of 
50 yards from a Direct Transfer.
    At any one time, WCS may have one conveyance containing one or more 
transportation packages with waste traveling to the CWF and one 
conveyance containing one or more transportation packages with waste 
traveling to the FWF. There would be no limit to the number of empty 
conveyances (i.e., with either no or empty transportation packages) 
traveling from the CWF and traveling from the FWF. Additionally, there 
may only be a maximum of one transportation package open at the CWF and 
one transportation package open at the FWF at the same time. The waste 
would be allowed to be at the CWF or the FWF for a maximum of 24 hours 
before being safely disposed of at that location, unless external 
factors (e.g., weather, equipment) dictate otherwise.

Need for the Proposed Action

    The need expressed by WCS in its initial December 4, 2014, request 
for the proposed action is to reduce the number of onsite transfers 
required to process rail and truck shipments of wastes containing SNM. 
The WCS considers that approval of this proposed action would result in 
a safer (less handling), more secure (less time above ground), and more 
efficient (less cost) handling of SNM waste shipments.
    The purpose of this EA is to assess the potential environmental 
impacts of the WCS December 2014 exemption request as modified through 
subsequent public interactions with the NRC. This EA does not approve 
or deny the requested action. A separate SER has been prepared in 
support of approval or denial of the requested action.

[[Page 17890]]

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC does not expect that significant changes in radiation 
hazards to workers would result from the proposed action. In performing 
the Direct Transfers, WCS would follow its State of Texas-approved 
radiation protection procedures (e.g., Radiation Safety Procedures, as 
low as is reasonably achievable [ALARA] Program) to keep radiological 
doses to workers within the State's regulatory limits (see Texas 
Administrative Code, Part 1, Chapter 336, Subchapter D, ``Standards for 
Protection Against Radiation''). The WCS conducts this approved 
radiation protection program with an emphasis on maintaining 
radiological doses to workers and the general public ALARA.
    To reduce the potential for inadvertent criticality, WCS would: (1) 
Be limited in the number of transportation packages transferred on a 
single conveyance to the CWF or the FWF using the total CSI of less 
than 50; (2) be required to have a maximum of only one transportation 
package open in the CWF and the FWF at the same time; and (3) be 
required to safely dispose of the waste in the CWF or the FWF within 24 
hours.
    The NRC staff does not expect the proposed action to result in 
substantive changes to the transportation impacts identified in prior 
EAs. The modified exemption request addresses only changes to onsite 
movement of SNM-bearing wastes. Direct Transfers to the CWF or the FWF 
would take place within an area under control by WCS, on pre-existing 
dedicated secure access roads, and with administrative controls (speed 
limits and enforced road blockages during Direct Transfers) intended to 
reduce the potential for, the severity of, and the potential 
consequences of accidents. Additionally, all Direct Transfers to the 
CWF and to the FWF would be escorted by radiation safety technicians 
and waste acceptance personnel. All other environmental impacts would 
be the same as those evaluated in the EAs that supported the previous 
versions of the NRC Order.
    If WCS' modified exemption request is approved by the NRC staff, 
then the NRC would issue a new Order to supersede the 2014 Order, with 
new conditions added to address the modified exemption request. The WCS 
would continue to be permitted to possess SNM at the TSDF that meets 
the concentration limits and controls without an NRC part 70 license. 
The WCS would continue to be permitted to possess at the TSDF, highly 
water soluble forms of SNM limited to amounts of SNM less than 
``special nuclear material of low strategic significance,'' as defined 
in 10 CFR 70.4.
    The State of Texas regulates effluent releases and potential doses 
to the public under the WCS license. The State of Texas would continue 
to regulate the SNM at the WCS facility subject to the Order, as long 
as WCS complies with the NRC Order.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered 
denial of the WCS' modified exemption request. This would result in the 
NRC not issuing a new order that would supersede the 2014 Order (i.e., 
the ``no action'' alternative). Under that alternative, WCS would 
continue its currently approved program for transferring SNM wastes to 
either the CWF or the FWF for disposal. Under that program, WCS would 
offload waste packages from conveyances one at a time to stay within 
the current above-ground SNM possession limit. Such actions would 
require multiple trips (as many as needed to individually transfer 
waste packages) to the CWF or to the FWF. Compared to the proposed 
action, this would result in an increased handling of SNM wastes, with 
a subsequently increased possibility of accidents and radiological 
exposure. However, WCS would continue to conduct its state-approved 
radiation protection program to maintain radiological doses to workers 
and the general public ALARA.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    On December 21, 2016, the staff consulted with the TCEQ, providing 
by email a copy of the draft EA for review and comment (ADAMS Accession 
No. ML17026A356). In an email dated January 12, 2017, the TCEQ stated 
that it had no comments of the draft EA (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML17026A360).
    The proposed action does not involve the development or disturbance 
of additional land. Hence, the NRC has determined that the proposed 
action will not affect listed endangered or threatened species or their 
critical habitat. Therefore, no further consultation is required under 
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Likewise, the NRC staff has 
determined that the proposed action does not have the potential to 
cause effects on historic properties even if they were present. Direct 
Transfers would take place on dedicated secure access roads within the 
WCS site, and no ground disturbing activities are associated with the 
proposed action. Therefore, no consultation is required under Section 
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    The NRC has reviewed WCS' December 4, 2014, request, as revised 
through subsequent public interactions between the NRC and WCS, to 
amend the 2014 Order. The NRC has found that effluent releases and 
potential radiological doses to the public are not anticipated to 
change as a result of this proposed action and that occupational 
exposures are expected to remain within regulatory limits and ALARA. On 
the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC finds that the 
proposed action has no significant impact on the quality of the human 
environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an 
environmental impact statement for the proposed action.

    Dated: April 4, 2017.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brian W. Smith,
Deputy Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and 
Environmental Review, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2017-07505 Filed 4-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
17888 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Notices

CFR), ‘‘Critical Mass,’’ at its Andrews WCS, under specified conditions, to and processing facility were transferred
County, Texas, facility, without first possess waste containing SNM in to RML R04100. Previous NRC Orders
obtaining from the NRC a 10 CFR part greater quantities than specified in 10 referred to that location as the
70 license. CFR part 150, ‘‘Exemptions and treatment, storage, and processing
The WCS operates a facility in Continued Regulatory Authority in facility. Subsequently, WCS began
Andrews County, Texas, (WCS site) that Agreement States and in Offshore referring to that location as the
is currently licensed by Texas to Waters under Section 274,’’ at the WCS ‘‘Treatment, Storage and Disposal
receive, possess, use, store, dispose and Site without obtaining an NRC license Facility.’’ The NRC will use the name
transfer certain types of radioactive pursuant to 10 CFR part 70. The NRC ‘‘Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
material contained in Low-Level Waste published the 2001 Order in the Federal Facility’’ and the abbreviation TSDF to
(LLW) and Mixed Waste (MW) (i.e., Register (FR) on November 15, 2001 (66 reference that location at the WCS Site
waste that is both hazardous waste and FR 57489). The publicly available in this EA.
LLW). The WCS site also receives November 21, 2001, NRC letter to WCS By letter dated July 18, 2014, WCS
hazardous and toxic waste for disposal. (ADAMS Accession No. ML030130085), requested modifications to the 2009
Under an Agreement authorized by the included as attachments the 2001 Order, Order to allow movement to and
Atomic Energy Act, as amended, the the October 2001 EA, and the November temporary storage of some of the Los
NRC can relinquish and a State can 2001 Safety Evaluation Report (SER). Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)
assume, regulatory authority over The EA discussed the conditions Waste at the WCS Federal Waste
radioactive material specified in an specified in the 2001 Order. Disposal Facility (FWF) rather than at
Agreement with the NRC. In 1963, By letters dated August 6, 2003, and the TSDF. The LANL Waste is U.S.
Texas entered into an Agreement and March 14, 2004, WCS requested a Department of Energy (DOE) waste that
assumed regulatory authority over modification to the 2001 Order to allow originated at the LANL that is destined
source, byproduct, and SNM less than a it to use additional reagents for for disposal at the DOE Waste Isolation
critical mass. chemical stabilization of mixed waste Pilot Plant (WIPP) Facility. Due to the
On November 30, 1997, the State of containing SNM. The NRC issued the February 14, 2014, WIPP incident, the
Texas Department of Health (TDH) new Order on November 4, 2004 (2004 DOE suspended operations at the WIPP
issued WCS a radioactive materials Order), which superseded the 2001 Facility. In April 2014, WCS began
license (RML) to possess, treat, and store Order. The NRC published the 2004 receiving some LANL Waste from DOE
LLW (RML R04971). In 1997, WCS Order in the FR on November 12, 2004 that met the conditions in the 2009
began accepting Resource Conservation (69 FR 65468). The October 2004 EA Order and WCS began storing the waste
and Recovery Act and Toxic Substance (ADAMS Accession No. ML043020614) at the TSDF. The NRC issued the 2014
Control Act wastes for treatment, and October 2004 SER (ADAMS Order to WCS on December 11, 2014,
storage, and disposal. Later that year, Accession No. ML042250362) discussed which superseded the 2009 Order. The
WCS received a license from the TDH the new conditions specified in the NRC published the 2014 Order in the FR
for treatment and storage of MW and 2004 Order. The 2004 Order allowed on December 11, 2014 (79 FR 73647),
LLW. The MW and LLW streams may WCS to use such chemical reagents as allowing temporary storage of some of
contain quantities of SNM. In 2007, it deems necessary for treatment and the LANL Waste at the WCS FWF. The
regulatory responsibility for RML stabilization of mixed waste containing October 2014 EA (ADAMS Accession
R04971 was transferred by TDH to the SNM, provided that the SNM mass does No. ML14238A208) and November 2014
Texas Commission on Environmental not exceed specified concentration SER (ADAMS Accession No.
Quality (TCEQ). In September 2009, the limits. ML14230A804) discussed the new
TCEQ issued RML R04100 to WCS for By letter dated December 10, 2007, conditions specified in the 2014 Order.
disposal of LLW. WCS requested modifications to the The previous NRC Orders (2001,
Section 70.3 of 10 CFR part 70 2004 Order. The NRC issued the new 2004, 2009, and 2014) addressed the
requires persons who own, acquire, Order to WCS on October 29, 2009 issue that 10 CFR 70.3 requires persons
deliver, receive, possess, use, or transfer (2009 Order), which superseded the who own, acquire, deliver, receive,
SNM to obtain a license pursuant to the 2004 Order. The NRC published the possess, use, or transfer SNM to obtain
requirements of 10 CFR part 70, 2009 Order in the FR on October 26, an NRC license pursuant to the
‘‘Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear 2009 (74 FR 55072). The October 2009 requirements in 10 CFR part 70.
Material.’’ The licensing requirements EA (ADAMS Accession No. However, 10 CFR 150.10 exempts a
in 10 CFR part 70 apply to persons in ML092460509) and October 2009 SER person in an Agreement State who
Agreement States possessing greater (ADAMS Accession No. ML093070307) possesses SNM in quantities not
than critical mass quantities, as defined discussed the new conditions specified sufficient to form a critical mass from
in 10 CFR 150.11, ‘‘Critical Mass.’’ in the 2009 Order. The 2009 Order the NRC’s imposed licensing
However, the Commission may grant changed the 2004 Order Conditions requirements and regulations. The
exemptions from the requirements of regarding sampling of waste, what is method for calculating the quantity of
specific regulations pursuant to 10 CFR allowed to be in the waste, and the SNM not sufficient to form a critical
70.17(a), if the Commission determines amount of highly water soluble SNM in mass is set out in 10 CFR 150.11.
the exemptions are ‘‘authorized by law each waste package. Therefore, prior to the 2001 Order, WCS
and will not endanger life or property or In July 2013, the TCEQ began to was required to comply with NRC
the common defense and security and merge the license requirements in RML regulatory requirements and obtain an
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

are otherwise in the public interest.’’ R04971 (for the radioactive waste NRC specific license to possess SNM in
In September 2000, WCS submitted to treatment, storage, and processing quantities greater than amounts
the NRC an exemption request from the facility) with the requirements in RML established in 10 CFR 150.11. The 2001
licensing requirements in 10 CFR part R04100 (for the LLW land disposal WCS exemption request to NRC
70. On November 21, 2001, the NRC facility). In Amendment No. 22 of RML proposed to use concentration-based
issued an Order to WCS (2001 Order) R04100, the TCEQ license requirements limits rather than mass-based limits at a
granting an exemption to WCS from related to the 2009 Order in RML specific location at the WCS Site. The
certain NRC regulations and permitted R04971 for the WCS treatment, storage, 2001 Order granted, and the subsequent

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Apr 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Notices 17889

NRC Orders (2004, 2009, and 2014) The following factors informed the • The SNM contained in either a
continued the use of concentration- NRC’s evaluation of the proposed transportation package or a waste
based limits and other conditions at action: package that meets the NRC proposed
specific locations at the WCS Site. The • The concept of CSI is discussed in conditions in the 2017 Order do not
TCEQ incorporated the concentration- 10 CFR part 71, ‘‘Packaging and apply towards the aboveground SNM
based limits and other conditions from Transport of Radioactive Material.’’ The possession limit at the WCS Site.
each respective NRC Order (2001, 2004, provisions in 10 CFR part 71 regulate Otherwise, that SNM does apply
2009, and 2014) into the WCS license the packaging, preparation for shipment, towards the aboveground SNM
for the specific locations at the WCS and transportation of radioactive possession limit at the WCS Site.
Site where the concentration-based material on public roadways. • When waste is removed from a
limits instead of mass-based limits and • 10 CFR 71.4 defines CSI as: ‘‘the railcar at the WCS Site, the SNM
other conditions are applicable. dimensionless number (rounded up to contained in that waste does apply
the next tenth) assigned to and placed towards the aboveground SNM
II. Environmental Assessment possession limit at the WCS Site.
on the label of a fissile material package,
Description of the Proposed Action to designate the degree of control of Under the modified request, the
accumulation of packages, overpacks, or Direct Transfers would only occur on
By letter dated December 4, 2014 appropriately dedicated secure access
freight containers containing fissile
(ADAMS Accession No. ML14342A773), roads, with conveyances travelling to
material during transportation.
WCS requested an exemption from NRC either the CWF or the FWF under the 25
Determination of the CSI is described in
regulations to possess SNM in excess of miles per hour speed limit.
10 CFR 71.22, 71.23, and 71.59. The CSI
the critical mass limits specified in 10 Additionally, Direct Transfers would be
for an overpack, freight container,
CFR 150.11 while performing specific escorted by at least two radiation safety
consignment, or conveyance containing
transfers aboveground at the WCS Site, technicians and two waste acceptance
fissile material packages is the
without first obtaining a 10 CFR part 70 personnel, with entrances to the access
arithmetic sum of the CSIs of all the
license. Through subsequent public roads blocked for a distance of 50 yards
fissile material packages contained
interactions between the NRC and WCS, from a Direct Transfer.
within the overpack, freight container,
the WCS request was revised to allow At any one time, WCS may have one
consignment, or conveyance.’’
transfer of waste from off-site the WCS conveyance containing one or more
• The NRC Glossary found at https:// transportation packages with waste
Site directly to either the Compact
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/ traveling to the CWF and one
Waste Facility (CWF) or the FWF, only
glossary.html, defines Fissile Material conveyance containing one or more
for disposal (Direct Transfer), without
as: ‘‘A nuclide that is capable of transportation packages with waste
the waste being applied towards the
undergoing fission after capturing low- traveling to the FWF. There would be no
aboveground SNM possession limit for
energy thermal (slow) neutrons . . . .’’ limit to the number of empty
the WCS Site. Pursuant to the NRC
• 10 CFR 71.22(a) includes: ‘‘A conveyances (i.e., with either no or
proposed conditions in the 2017 Order:
general license is issued to any licensee empty transportation packages)
(1) WCS would continue to possess
of the Commission to transport fissile traveling from the CWF and traveling
waste when it enters the WCS-owned
material, or to deliver fissile material to from the FWF. Additionally, there may
rail spur (for rail shipments) or when it
a carrier for transport if the material is only be a maximum of one
enters the WCS Site (for truck
shipped in accordance with this transportation package open at the CWF
shipments); (2) for Direct Transfers,
section.’’ Other provisions in the and one transportation package open at
waste would not apply towards the
regulation specify the CSIs for the FWF at the same time. The waste
aboveground SNM possession limit
individual packages and for the would be allowed to be at the CWF or
until it is removed from the rail car (for
shipments of multiple packages. Section the FWF for a maximum of 24 hours
rail shipments) or removed from the
71.22(d)(3) specifically includes: ‘‘For a before being safely disposed of at that
truck (for truck shipments); and (3) for
shipment of multiple packages location, unless external factors (e.g.,
Direct Transfers, waste would not be
containing fissile material, the sum of weather, equipment) dictate otherwise.
processed, treated, or stored at the WCS
the CSIs must be less than or equal to
Site. The NRC used the concept of Need for the Proposed Action
50 (for shipment on a nonexclusive use
Criticality Safety Index (CSI) as the
conveyance) . . . .’’ The need expressed by WCS in its
safety basis to support the NRC
proposed conditions in the 2017 Order. • Use of the CSI of 50 from 10 CFR initial December 4, 2014, request for the
All aboveground waste containing SNM part 71 for the safe transportation of proposed action is to reduce the number
possessed by WCS would apply towards radioactive material on public roads of onsite transfers required to process
the aboveground SNM possession limit, provides adequate safety for direct rail and truck shipments of wastes
except waste meeting the Direct transfers at the WCS Site. containing SNM. The WCS considers
Transfer proposed conditions in the • The definition of ‘‘conveyance’’ in that approval of this proposed action
2017 Order. 10 CFR 71.4 includes: ‘‘For transport by would result in a safer (less handling),
public highway or rail any transport more secure (less time above ground),
The NRC staff evaluated the three vehicle or freight container . . . .’’ and more efficient (less cost) handling
types of Direct Transfers: • A transportation package is a of SNM waste shipments.
• Off-site containerized waste that container placed on or in a conveyance. The purpose of this EA is to assess the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

arrives by truck and sent directly to the A transportation package can contain potential environmental impacts of the
CWF only for disposal; one or more waste packages. WCS December 2014 exemption request
• Off-site containerized waste that • A waste package is a container with as modified through subsequent public
arrives by truck and sent directly to the waste that was placed inside a interactions with the NRC. This EA does
FWF only for disposal; and transportation package. not approve or deny the requested
• Off-site bulk waste that arrives by • For this modified request, the action. A separate SER has been
truck and sent directly to the FWF only concept of CSI only applies to prepared in support of approval or
for disposal. transportation packages. denial of the requested action.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Apr 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1
17890 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Notices

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed possess at the TSDF, highly water activities are associated with the
Action soluble forms of SNM limited to proposed action. Therefore, no
The NRC does not expect that amounts of SNM less than ‘‘special consultation is required under Section
significant changes in radiation hazards nuclear material of low strategic 106 of the National Historic
to workers would result from the significance,’’ as defined in 10 CFR 70.4. Preservation Act.
The State of Texas regulates effluent
proposed action. In performing the III. Finding of No Significant Impact
releases and potential doses to the
Direct Transfers, WCS would follow its The NRC has reviewed WCS’
public under the WCS license. The State
State of Texas-approved radiation December 4, 2014, request, as revised
of Texas would continue to regulate the
protection procedures (e.g., Radiation through subsequent public interactions
SNM at the WCS facility subject to the
Safety Procedures, as low as is between the NRC and WCS, to amend
Order, as long as WCS complies with
reasonably achievable [ALARA] the 2014 Order. The NRC has found that
the NRC Order.
Program) to keep radiological doses to effluent releases and potential
workers within the State’s regulatory Environmental Impacts of the radiological doses to the public are not
limits (see Texas Administrative Code, Alternatives to the Proposed Action anticipated to change as a result of this
Part 1, Chapter 336, Subchapter D, As an alternative to the proposed proposed action and that occupational
‘‘Standards for Protection Against action, the NRC staff considered denial exposures are expected to remain within
Radiation’’). The WCS conducts this of the WCS’ modified exemption regulatory limits and ALARA. On the
approved radiation protection program request. This would result in the NRC basis of the environmental assessment,
with an emphasis on maintaining not issuing a new order that would the NRC finds that the proposed action
radiological doses to workers and the supersede the 2014 Order (i.e., the ‘‘no has no significant impact on the quality
general public ALARA. action’’ alternative). Under that of the human environment.
To reduce the potential for alternative, WCS would continue its Accordingly, the NRC has determined
inadvertent criticality, WCS would: (1) currently approved program for not to prepare an environmental impact
Be limited in the number of transferring SNM wastes to either the statement for the proposed action.
transportation packages transferred on a CWF or the FWF for disposal. Under Dated: April 4, 2017.
single conveyance to the CWF or the that program, WCS would offload waste
FWF using the total CSI of less than 50; For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
packages from conveyances one at a Commission.
(2) be required to have a maximum of time to stay within the current above-
only one transportation package open in Brian W. Smith,
ground SNM possession limit. Such
the CWF and the FWF at the same time; Deputy Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety,
actions would require multiple trips (as Safeguards, and Environmental Review,
and (3) be required to safely dispose of many as needed to individually transfer Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
the waste in the CWF or the FWF within waste packages) to the CWF or to the Safeguards.
24 hours. FWF. Compared to the proposed action, [FR Doc. 2017–07505 Filed 4–12–17; 8:45 am]
The NRC staff does not expect the this would result in an increased BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
proposed action to result in substantive handling of SNM wastes, with a
changes to the transportation impacts subsequently increased possibility of
identified in prior EAs. The modified accidents and radiological exposure.
exemption request addresses only OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
However, WCS would continue to MANAGEMENT
changes to onsite movement of SNM- conduct its state-approved radiation
bearing wastes. Direct Transfers to the protection program to maintain Submission for Review: Designation of
CWF or the FWF would take place radiological doses to workers and the Beneficiary, Federal Employees
within an area under control by WCS, general public ALARA. Retirement System, (FERS), SF 3102
on pre-existing dedicated secure access
roads, and with administrative controls Agencies and Persons Consulted AGENCY: Office of Personnel
(speed limits and enforced road On December 21, 2016, the staff Management.
blockages during Direct Transfers) consulted with the TCEQ, providing by ACTION: 60-Day Notice and request for
intended to reduce the potential for, the email a copy of the draft EA for review comments.
severity of, and the potential and comment (ADAMS Accession No.
consequences of accidents. ML17026A356). In an email dated SUMMARY: The Retirement Services,
Additionally, all Direct Transfers to the January 12, 2017, the TCEQ stated that Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
CWF and to the FWF would be escorted it had no comments of the draft EA offers the general public and other
by radiation safety technicians and (ADAMS Accession No. ML17026A360). Federal agencies the opportunity to
waste acceptance personnel. All other The proposed action does not involve comment on an extension, without
environmental impacts would be the the development or disturbance of change, of a currently approved
same as those evaluated in the EAs that additional land. Hence, the NRC has information collection request (ICR),
supported the previous versions of the determined that the proposed action Designation of Beneficiary (FERS), SF
NRC Order. will not affect listed endangered or 3102.
If WCS’ modified exemption request threatened species or their critical DATES: Comments are encouraged and
is approved by the NRC staff, then the habitat. Therefore, no further will be accepted until June 12, 2017.
NRC would issue a new Order to consultation is required under Section 7 ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

supersede the 2014 Order, with new of the Endangered Species Act. invited to submit written comments on
conditions added to address the Likewise, the NRC staff has determined the proposed information collection to
modified exemption request. The WCS that the proposed action does not have the Retirement Services, U.S. Office of
would continue to be permitted to the potential to cause effects on historic Personnel Management, 1900 E Street
possess SNM at the TSDF that meets the properties even if they were present. NW., Washington, DC 20415, Attention:
concentration limits and controls Direct Transfers would take place on Alberta Butler, Room 2347–E or sent via
without an NRC part 70 license. The dedicated secure access roads within electronic mail to Alberta.Butler@
WCS would continue to be permitted to the WCS site, and no ground disturbing opm.gov.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Apr 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1
Document Created: 2017-04-13 01:08:44
Document Modified: 2017-04-13 01:08:44
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance.
Dates		The EA and FONSI are available as of April 13, 2017.
Contact		James Park, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6954; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 17887