82 FR 18163 - Regulatory Analysis Guidelines
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 72 (April 17, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 72 (April 17, 2017)
| Page Range | 18163-18165 | |
| FR Document | 2017-07623 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 72 (Monday, April 17, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 18163-18165] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-07623] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2017-0091] Regulatory Analysis Guidelines AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment a draft NUREG, NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 5, ``Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. NRC.'' This proposed revision to NUREG/ BR-0058 would update and restructure the NRC's cost-benefit guidance documents by incorporating information contained in NUREG/BR-0184, ``Regulatory Analysis Technical Handbook,'' into this document and would expand the discussion of cost-benefit analyses in NRC's regulatory analyses, backfitting analyses, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses. Additionally, the update incorporates improvements in methods for assessing factors that are difficult to quantify, incorporates relevant cost estimating best practices, and includes improvements in uncertainty analyses for use in cost-benefit analyses. DATES: Submit comments by June 16, 2017. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0091. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Noto, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, telephone: 301-415-6795, email: [email protected], U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0091 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly available information related to this action by any of the following methods: Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0091. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. For the convenience of the reader, instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are provided in the ``Availability of Documents'' section. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2017-0091 in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS. II. Discussion The proposed revision to NUREG/BR-0058 is the first of two phases to update the NRC's cost-benefit guidance documents, primarily NUREG/ BR-0058, Revision 4, ``Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. NRC,'' and NUREG/BR-0184, ``Regulatory Analysis Technical Handbook.'' This update identifies potential changes to current methods and tools related to performing cost-benefit analyses in support of regulatory analyses, backfitting analyses, and environmental analyses. In response to questions posed after the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in Japan, the NRC staff recommended enhancing the currency and consistency of the existing regulatory framework through updates to cost-benefit analysis guidance documents, including aligning cost-benefit guidance across the agency in both reactor and materials program areas in SECY-12-0110, ``Consideration of Economic Consequences in the NRC's [[Page 18164]] Regulatory Framework.'' In the staff requirements memorandum (SRM) for SECY-12-0110, the Commission approved this recommendation and directed the NRC staff to identify potential changes to current methodologies and tools to perform cost-benefit analyses in support of regulatory, backfit, and environmental analyses. Further, the Commission directed the NRC staff to provide a regulatory gap analysis prior to developing new cost-benefit guidance. In response to Commission direction, the NRC staff prepared SECY- 14-0002, ``Plan for Updating NRC's Cost-Benefit Guidance;'' SECY-14- 0087, ``Qualitative Consideration of Factors in the Development of Regulatory Analyses and Backfit Analyses;'' and SECY-14-0143, ``Regulatory Gap Analysis of the NRC's Cost-Benefit Guidance and Practices.'' Further details regarding these documents are provided below. In response to the SRM for SECY-12-0110, the NRC staff wrote SECY- 14-0002. The NRC staff identified potential changes to current methodologies and tools related to performing cost-benefit analyses in support of regulatory, backfit, and environmental analyses. In this SECY paper, the NRC staff recommended a two-phased approach to revise the content and structure of the cost-benefit guidance documents. Phase 1 begins to align regulatory guidance across the agency in both reactor and materials program areas by restructuring and pursuing some policy revisions. This SECY paper describes Phase 1 as a restructuring of the three main NRC cost-benefit guidance documents, where NUREG/BR-0184 and NUREG-1409, ``Backfitting Guidelines,'' are incorporated into NUREG/BR- 0058. Because of the June 9, 2016, ``Tasking Related to Implementation of Agency Backfitting and Issue Finality Guidance,'' NUREG-1409 will be kept as a stand-alone document. Cost-benefit information related to backfitting will be incorporated into the proposed revision to NUREG/ BR-0058. Phase 1 will now consist of revising and consolidating two NUREG documents into a single NUREG; updating data, methods, and references; and addressing audit findings and case-study recommendations. Subsequently, Phase 2 will identify and discuss potential policy issues for Commission consideration that could affect the NRC's cost-benefit guidance and incorporate updates to guidance on backfitting. Phase 1 of the proposed revision to NUREG/BR-0058 includes outlines for future appendices. The NRC staff wrote SECY-14-0087 in response to the SRM-SECY-12- 0157, ``Consideration of Additional Requirements for Containment Venting Systems for Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II Containments,'' which directed the NRC staff to seek guidance regarding the use of qualitative factors. The SECY-14-0087 proposed updating the cost-benefit guidance to include a set of methods that could be used for qualitative consideration of factors within a cost-benefit analysis for regulatory and backfit analyses. In the SRM for SECY-14-0087, the Commission approved the plans for updating guidance regarding qualitative factors, including the treatment of uncertainties, and directed the update to focus on capturing best practices for the consideration of qualitative factors. The Commission also directed the NRC staff to develop a toolkit for the analyst to clarify how to consider and document the use of qualitative factors. Appendix A, ``Qualitative Factors Assessment Tools,'' of the proposed revision to NUREG/BR-0058 provides this toolkit for considering qualitative factors. In 2014, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted a performance audit in which the NRC's cost-estimating procedures were reviewed. The GAO audit report, GAO-15-98, ``NRC Needs to Improve its Cost Estimates by Incorporating More Best Practices,'' recommended that the NRC align its cost estimating procedures with relevant cost estimating best practices identified in the ``GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide'' (GAO-09-3SP). The NRC staff has addressed the GAO recommendations in Appendix B, ``Cost Estimating and Best Practices,'' of the proposed revision to NUREG/BR-0058. This proposed revision to NUREG/BR-0058 would make three main changes. First, the revision to NUREG/BR-0058 consolidates cost-benefit guidance that is used across the agency. The NRC staff has expanded the draft document to provide additional guidance for performing the NRC's materials licensee regulatory analyses, backfit analyses, and NEPA analyses. Second, this revision provides methods for assessing factors that are difficult to quantify, incorporates cost-estimating best practices, and expands on methods to quantify uncertainties. This revision provides guidance intended to enhance clarity, transparency, and consistency of analyses for the decisionmaker. Finally, this revision uses appendices to provide detailed technical material that is subject to change. These appendices will be issued and controlled separately to facilitate the maintenance of this information. Appendices that will be issued initially include Appendix A, ``Qualitative Factors Assessment Tools''; Appendix B, ``Cost Estimating and Best Practices''; Appendix C, ``The Treatment of Uncertainty''; Appendix D, ``Guidance on Regulatory Analyses Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Changes''; and Appendix E, ``Special Circumstances.'' The NRC staff held a Category 3 public meeting on July 16, 2015, to discuss the proposed structure and changes to the NRC cost-benefit guidance in Phase 1. The NRC presentation can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15189A463, and the meeting summary can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15217A420. The NRC staff also held a Category 3 public workshop on March 3, 2016, to discuss NRC activities to improve its cost-benefit guidance including the newly developed qualitative factors assessment tools, cost estimating and best practices, and the treatment of uncertainty. The NRC presentation can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16061A139, and the meeting summary can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16084A167. Additionally, the NRC staff held an Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Regulatory Policies and Practices Subcommittee meeting on February 7, 2017, and an ACRS Full Committee meeting on March 9, 2017. III. Availability of Documents The NRC may post additional materials related to this activity to the Federal rulemaking Web site at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2017-0091. These documents will inform the public of the current status of this activity and/or provide additional material for use at future public meetings. The Federal rulemaking Web site allows you to receive alerts when changes or additions occur in a docket folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket folder (NRC-2017-0091); (2) click the ``Sign up for Email Alerts'' link; and (3) enter your email address and select how frequently you would like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or monthly). The documents identified in the following table are available to interested persons as indicated. [[Page 18165]] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Document ADAMS accession No./web link ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 5, ``Regulatory ML17101A355. Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. NRC''. NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 4, ``Regulatory ML042820192. Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. NRC''. NUREG/BR-0184, ``Regulatory Analysis Technical ML050190193. Evaluation Handbook''. SECY-14-0002, ``Plan for Updating NRC's Cost- ML13274A519. Benefit Guidance,'' January 2, 2014. SECY-14-0087, ``Qualitative Consideration of ML14127A458 (Package). Factors in the Development of Regulatory Analyses and Backfit Analyses,'' September 11, 2014. SECY-14-0143, ``Regulatory Gap Analysis of the ML14280A426 (Package). NRC's Cost-Benefit Guidance and Practices,'' December 16, 2014. SECY-12-0110, ``Consideration of Economic ML12173A478 (Package). Consequences within the U.S. NRC's Regulatory Framework,'' August 14, 2012. SRM for SECY-12-0110, ``Consideration of ML13079A055. Economic Consequences within the U.S. NRC's Regulatory Framework,'' March 20, 2013. SRM for SECY-14-0087, ''Qualitative ML15063A568. Consideration of Factors in the Development of Regulatory Analyses and Backfit Analyses,'' March 4, 2015. NUREG-1409, ``Backftting Guidelines''......... ML032230247. ``Tasking Related to Implementation of Agency ML16133A575. Backfitting and Issue Finality Guidance,'' June 9, 2016. AO-15-98, ``NRC Needs to Improve its Cost http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/667501.pdf. Estimates by Incorporating More Best Practices''. GAO-09-3SP, ``GAO Cost Estimating and http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d093sp.pdf. Assessment Guide''. SRM for SECY-12-0157, ``Consideration of ML13078A017. Additional Requirements for Containment Venting Systems for Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II Containments,'' March 12, 2013. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of April 2017. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Anita L. Lund, Director, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2017-07623 Filed 4-14-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 72 / Monday, April 17, 2017 / Notices 18163
recordings will be permitted only analyses, and National Environmental Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
during those portions of the meeting Policy Act (NEPA) analyses. please contact the NRC’s Public
that are open to the public. Detailed Additionally, the update incorporates Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
procedures for the conduct of and improvements in methods for assessing 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
participation in ACRS meetings were factors that are difficult to quantify, email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. For the
published in the Federal Register on incorporates relevant cost estimating convenience of the reader, instructions
October 17, 2016, (81 FR 71543). best practices, and includes about obtaining materials referenced in
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting improvements in uncertainty analyses this document are provided in the
transcripts are available on the NRC for use in cost-benefit analyses. ‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section.
Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- DATES: Submit comments by June 16, • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
rm/doc-collections/acrs. Information 2017. Comments received after this date purchase copies of public documents at
regarding topics to be discussed, will be considered if it is practical to do the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
changes to the agenda, whether the so, but the Commission is able to ensure White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
meeting has been canceled or consideration only for comments Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
rescheduled, and the time allotted to received on or before this date. B. Submitting Comments
present oral statements can be obtained ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
from the Web site cited above or by Please include Docket ID NRC–2017–
by any of the following methods: 0091 in your comment submission.
contacting the identified DFO. • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
Moreover, in view of the possibility that The NRC cautions you not to include
http://www.regulations.gov and search identifying or contact information that
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be for Docket ID NRC–2017–0091. Address
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary you do not want to be publicly
questions about NRC dockets to Carol disclosed in your comment submission.
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting, Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
persons planning to attend should check The NRC will post all comment
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For submissions at http://
with these references if such technical questions, contact the
rescheduling would result in a major www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER comment submissions into ADAMS.
inconvenience. INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
If attending this meeting, please enter The NRC does not routinely edit
document. comment submissions to remove
through the One White Flint North • Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
building, 11555 Rockville Pike, identifying or contact information.
Office of Administration, Mail Stop: If you are requesting or aggregating
Rockville, Maryland 20852. After OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear comments from other persons for
registering with Security, please contact Regulatory Commission, Washington, submission to the NRC, then you should
Mr. Theron Brown (Telephone 240– DC 20555–0001. inform those persons not to include
888–9835) to be escorted to the meeting For additional direction on obtaining identifying or contact information that
room. information and submitting comments, they do not want to be publicly
Dated: April 7, 2017. see ‘‘Obtaining Information and disclosed in their comment submission.
Michael Snodderly, Submitting Comments’’ in the Your request should state that the NRC
Acting Branch Chief, Technical Support SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of does not routinely edit comment
Branch, Advisory Committee on Reactor this document. submissions to remove such information
Safeguards. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: before making the comment
[FR Doc. 2017–07704 Filed 4–14–17; 8:45 am] Pamela Noto, Office of Nuclear Reactor submissions available to the public or
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Regulation, telephone: 301–415–6795, entering the comment into ADAMS.
email: Pamela.Noto@nrc.gov, U.S. II. Discussion
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY Washington, DC 20555–0001. The proposed revision to NUREG/BR–
COMMISSION 0058 is the first of two phases to update
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the NRC’s cost-benefit guidance
[NRC–2017–0091]
I. Obtaining Information and documents, primarily NUREG/BR–0058,
Regulatory Analysis Guidelines Submitting Comments Revision 4, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis
Guidelines of the U.S. NRC,’’ and
A. Obtaining Information
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory NUREG/BR–0184, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis
Commission. Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2017– Technical Handbook.’’ This update
ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for 0091 when contacting the NRC about identifies potential changes to current
comment. the availability of information for this methods and tools related to performing
action. You may obtain publicly cost-benefit analyses in support of
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory available information related to this regulatory analyses, backfitting
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public action by any of the following methods: analyses, and environmental analyses.
comment a draft NUREG, NUREG/BR– • Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to In response to questions posed after
0058, Revision 5, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis http://www.regulations.gov and search the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Guidelines of the U.S. NRC.’’ This for Docket ID NRC–2017–0091. plant in Japan, the NRC staff
proposed revision to NUREG/BR–0058 • NRC’s Agencywide Documents recommended enhancing the currency
would update and restructure the NRC’s Access and Management System and consistency of the existing
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
cost-benefit guidance documents by (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly regulatory framework through updates
incorporating information contained in available documents online in the to cost-benefit analysis guidance
NUREG/BR–0184, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis ADAMS Public Documents collection at documents, including aligning cost-
Technical Handbook,’’ into this http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ benefit guidance across the agency in
document and would expand the adams.html. To begin the search, select both reactor and materials program
discussion of cost-benefit analyses in ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then areas in SECY–12–0110, ‘‘Consideration
NRC’s regulatory analyses, backfitting select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS of Economic Consequences in the NRC’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Apr 14, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_18235/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 72 / Monday, April 17, 2017 / Notices 18165
Document ADAMS accession No./web link
NUREG/BR–0058, Revision 5, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. NRC’’ .................. ML17101A355.
NUREG/BR–0058, Revision 4, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. NRC’’ .................. ML042820192.
NUREG/BR–0184, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis Technical Evaluation Handbook’’ ............................... ML050190193.
SECY–14–0002, ‘‘Plan for Updating NRC’s Cost-Benefit Guidance,’’ January 2, 2014 ............. ML13274A519.
SECY–14–0087, ‘‘Qualitative Consideration of Factors in the Development of Regulatory ML14127A458 (Package).
Analyses and Backfit Analyses,’’ September 11, 2014.
SECY–14–0143, ‘‘Regulatory Gap Analysis of the NRC’s Cost-Benefit Guidance and Prac- ML14280A426 (Package).
tices,’’ December 16, 2014.
SECY–12–0110, ‘‘Consideration of Economic Consequences within the U.S. NRC’s Regu- ML12173A478 (Package).
latory Framework,’’ August 14, 2012.
SRM for SECY–12–0110, ‘‘Consideration of Economic Consequences within the U.S. NRC’s ML13079A055.
Regulatory Framework,’’ March 20, 2013.
SRM for SECY–14–0087, ’’Qualitative Consideration of Factors in the Development of Regu- ML15063A568.
latory Analyses and Backfit Analyses,’’ March 4, 2015.
NUREG–1409, ‘‘Backftting Guidelines’’ ....................................................................................... ML032230247.
‘‘Tasking Related to Implementation of Agency Backfitting and Issue Finality Guidance,’’ June ML16133A575.
9, 2016.
AO–15–98, ‘‘NRC Needs to Improve its Cost Estimates by Incorporating More Best Prac- http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/667501.pdf.
tices’’.
GAO–09–3SP, ‘‘GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide’’ ................................................ http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d093sp.pdf.
SRM for SECY–12–0157, ‘‘Consideration of Additional Requirements for Containment Venting ML13078A017.
Systems for Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II Containments,’’ March 12,
2013.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day Register. The following executives have SUMMARY: The Service Employees
of April 2017. been designated as members of the International Union Local 1 Cleveland
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Performance Review Board for the U.S. Pension Plan requested the Pension
Anita L. Lund, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board: Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) to
Director, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Steven M. Becker, Board Member, U.S. approve a plan amendment providing
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Nuclear Waste Technical Review for special withdrawal liability rules for
[FR Doc. 2017–07623 Filed 4–14–17; 8:45 am] Board employers that maintain the Plan. PBGC
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Linda K. Nozick, Board Member, U.S. published a Notice of Pendency of the
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Request for Approval of the amendment.
Board In accordance with the provisions of the
NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL Paul J. Turinsky, Board Member, U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security
REVIEW BOARD Nuclear Waste Technical Review Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), PBGC
Board is now advising the public that the
Formation of SES Performance Review Katherine R. Herrera, Deputy General agency has approved the requested
Board Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities amendment.
Safety Board ADDRESSES: A copy of the plan’s
AGENCY: Nuclear Waste Technical Timothy J. Dwyer, Member, Technical complete request may be requested from
Review Board. Staff, Defense Nuclear Facilities the Disclosure Officer, Pension Benefit
ACTION: Notice. Safety Board Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street
Richard E. Tontodonato, Deputy NW., Suite 11101, Washington, DC
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Waste Technical
Technical Director, Defense Nuclear 20005 (fax 202–326–4042).
Review Board is announcing the
Facilities Safety Board FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
members Performance Review Board.
DATES: Effectively immediately and
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 10262. Bruce Perlin, Assistant Chief Counsel
until April 30, 2018. Dated: April 4, 2017. (Perlin.Bruce@PBGC.gov), 202–326–
Debra L. Dickson,
4020, ext. 6818 or Jon Chatalian, Deputy
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Assistant Chief Counsel (Chatalian.Jon@
further information about the formation Director of Administration, U.S. Nuclear
Waste Technical Review Board.
PBGC.gov), ext. 6757, Office of the Chief
of the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Counsel, Suite 340, 1200 K Street NW.,
Review Board’s Performance Review [FR Doc. 2017–06998 Filed 4–14–17; 8:45 am]
Washington, DC 20005–4026; (TTY/
Board, please contact Debra L. Dickson BILLING CODE P
TDD users may call the Federal relay
at 703.235.4480 or via email at dickson@ service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and
nwtrb.gov, or via mail at 2300 Clarendon ask to be connected to 202–326–4020.)
Blvd., Suite 1300, Arlington, VA 22201 PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section CORPORATION
4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5 of the Background
United States Code, requires each Approval of Special Withdrawal The Pension Benefit Guaranty
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
agency to establish, in accordance with Liability Rules: the Service Employees Corporation (PBGC) administers title IV
regulations prescribed by the Office of International Union Local 1 Cleveland of the Employee Retirement Income
Personnel Management, one or more Pension Plan Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
SES Performance Review Boards. AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Under section 4201 of ERISA, an
Section 4314(c)(4) of Title 5 requires Corporation. employer that completely or partially
that notice of appointment of board withdraws from a defined benefit
ACTION: Notice of Approval.
members be published in the Federal multiemployer pension plan becomes
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Apr 14, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_18235/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-08-25 11:27:47
Document Modified: 2018-08-25 11:27:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Draft NUREG; request for comment. | |
| Dates | Submit comments by June 16, 2017. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. | |
| Contact | Pamela Noto, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, telephone: 301-415-6795, email: [email protected], U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 18163 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR