82 FR 21153 - Safety Zone; Potomac River, Newburg, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 86 (May 5, 2017)

Page Range		21153-21155
FR Document		2017-09160

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Potomac River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during a fireworks display in Charles County near Newburg, MD, on June 17, 2017. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland- National Capital Region or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21153-21155]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0357]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Potomac River, Newburg, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone 
for certain waters of the Potomac River. This action is necessary to 
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during a fireworks 
display in Charles County near Newburg, MD, on June 17, 2017. This 
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering 
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-
National Capital Region or a designated representative. We invite your 
comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0357 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, Sector Maryland-
National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On April 11, 2017, Gilligan's Pier of Newburg, MD, notified the 
Coast Guard that it will be conducting a short-duration aerial 
fireworks display at 9

[[Page 21154]]

p.m. on June 17, 2017. Details of the proposed event were provided to 
the Coast Guard on April 26, 2017. The fireworks display will be 
conducted by Innovative Pyrotechnic Concepts, LLC and launched from a 
barge located in the Potomac River, in Charles County near Newburg, MD. 
In the event of inclement weather, the fireworks display will be 
scheduled for June 24, 2017. Hazards from fireworks displays include 
accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling 
hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the Port (COTP) has 
determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be 
used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 200-
yard radius of the fireworks discharge site. The purpose of this 
rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels and the navigable waters 
within 200-yard radius of the barge before, during, and after the 
scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under 
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 8:30 p.m. through 
10 p.m. on June 17, 2017, and if necessary due to inclement weather, 
from 8:30 p.m. through 10 p.m. on June 24, 2017. The safety zone would 
include all navigable waters of the Potomac River, within 200 yards 
radius of the fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 
38[deg]23'45.2'' N., longitude 076[deg]59'31.8'' W., located near 
Newburg, MD. The duration of the safety zone is intended to ensure the 
safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after 
the scheduled 9 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person would be 
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from 
the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are 
proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic 
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would 
impact a small designated area of the Potomac River for 2\1/2\ hours 
during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the 
Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM 
marine channel 16 about the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While the precise number of small entities impacted is unknown, 
this section of the Potomac normally has a low number of vessels 
transiting the area planned for the safety zone, during the enforcement 
period. Although, some owners or operators of vessels intending to 
transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated 
in section IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant 
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42

[[Page 21155]]

U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this 
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
proposed rule involves a safety zone lasting 2\1/2\ hours that would 
prohibit vessel movement within a 200 yard radius of the fireworks 
barge on the Potomac River. Normally such actions are categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of 
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of Environmental 
Consideration (REC) supporting this determination is available in the 
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0357 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.0357  Safety Zone; Potomac River, Charles County, MD.

    (a) Definitions. As used in this section:
    Captain of the Port means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector 
Maryland-National Capital Region.
    Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, 
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the safety 
zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable 
waters of the Potomac River, within 200 yards radius of a fireworks 
barge in approximate position latitude 38[deg]23'45.2'' N., longitude 
076[deg]59'31.8'' W., located near Newburg, MD. All coordinates refer 
to datum NAD 1983.
    (c) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33 
CFR 165 subpart C apply to the safety zone created by this section.
    (1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations 
governing safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
    (2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless 
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Maryland--National 
Capital Region. All vessels underway within this safety zone at the 
time it is implemented are to depart the zone.
    (3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone must 
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Maryland--
National Capital Region or designated representative. To request 
permission to transit the area, the Captain of the Port Maryland--
National Capital Region and or designated representatives can be 
contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF-
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this 
section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 
MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other Federal, 
State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing light, or 
other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. If 
permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the 
instructions of the Captain of the Port Maryland--National Capital 
Region or designated representative and proceed as directed while 
within the zone.
    (4) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in 
the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and 
local agencies.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30 
p.m. through 10 p.m. on June 17, 2017, and if necessary due to 
inclement weather, from 8:30 p.m. through 10 p.m. on June 24, 2017.

    Dated: May 1, 2017.
L.P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland--National 
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2017-09160 Filed 5-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules 21153

(k) Optional Terminating Actions be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOC- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
(1) Accomplishing the preventative Requests@faa.gov. SECURITY
modification, including doing high frequency (2) Before using any approved AMOC,
EC open-hole inspections for cracking in the notify your appropriate principal inspector, Coast Guard
existing fastener holes, in accordance with or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
Part 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
33 CFR Part 165
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
757–53–0097, Revision 3, dated December 2, (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable [Docket Number USCG–2017–0357]
2016, except as required by paragraph (l)(2) level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this RIN 1625–AA00
of this AD, terminates the inspections
required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, AD if it is approved by the Boeing
provided the preventative modification is Commercial Airplanes Organization Safety Zone; Potomac River, Newburg,
done before further flight after accomplishing Designation Authorization (ODA) that has MD
an inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
this AD. If any cracking is found during any ACO, to make those findings. To be
high frequency EC open-hole inspection, approved, the repair method, modification ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
before further flight, repair using a method deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
approved in accordance with the procedures
The Coast Guard proposes to
SUMMARY:
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. approval must specifically refer to this AD.establish a temporary safety zone for
(2) Replacing the crown skin panel (4) AMOCs approved for AD 2011–01–15 certain waters of the Potomac River.
between station (STA) 297 and STA 439, and are approved as AMOCs for the This action is necessary to provide for
stringers S–4L and S–4R, in accordance with corresponding provisions of paragraph (g) ofthe safety of life on navigable waters
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing during a fireworks display in Charles
this AD; except, as of the effective date of this
Special Attention Service Bulletin 757–53– AD, AMOCs that extend the initial County near Newburg, MD, on June 17,
0097, Revision 3, dated December 2, 2016, or compliance times specified in AD 2011–01– 2017. This proposed rulemaking would
using a method approved in accordance with 15 are no longer approved for the complianceprohibit persons and vessels from
the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of time extension and the compliance times
this AD, terminates the inspections required entering the safety zone unless
required by this AD must be complied with.
by paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this authorized by the Captain of the Port
(5) For service information that contains
AD. steps that are labeled as Required for Maryland-National Capital Region or a
Compliance (RC), the provisions of designated representative. We invite
(l) Exceptions to Service Information
paragraphs (n)(5)(i) and (n)(5)(ii) apply. your comments on this proposed
Specifications and Preventative Modification
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including rulemaking.
(1) Where Boeing Special Attention Service substeps under an RC step and any figures
Bulletin 757–53–0097, Revision 3, dated DATES: Comments and related material
identified in an RC step, must be done to
December 2, 2016, specifies a compliance must be received by the Coast Guard on
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
time ‘‘after the Revision 2 date of this service for any deviations to RC steps, including or before June 5, 2017.
bulletin,’’ or ‘‘after the Revision 3 date of this substeps and identified figures. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
service bulletin,’’ this AD requires (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be identified by docket number USCG–
compliance within the specified compliance deviated from using accepted methods in 2017–0357 using the Federal
time after the effective date of this AD. accordance with the operator’s maintenance
(2) Where Boeing Special Attention Service
eRulemaking Portal at http://
or inspection program without obtaining www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Bulletin 757–53–0097, Revision 3, dated
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, Participation and Request for
December 2, 2016, specifies to contact Boeing
including substeps and identified figures, can
Comments’’ portion of the
for repair instructions: Before further flight,
still be done as specified, and the airplane
repair using a method approved in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
accordance with the procedures specified in further instructions on submitting
paragraph (n) of this AD. (o) Related Information comments.
(m) Credit for Previous Actions (1) For more information about this AD, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
contact Eric Schrieber, Aerospace Engineer, you have questions about this proposed
This paragraph provides credit for Zone 1
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
inspections required by paragraph (g)(1) of rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald
Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
this AD, if those actions were performed
Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627– Houck, Sector Maryland-National
before the effective date of this AD using Capital Region Waterways Management
5348; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
Eric.Schrieber@faa.gov.
757–53–0097, dated November 22, 2010
(2) For service information identified in 410–576–2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@
(which was incorporated by reference in AD
2011–01–15); Boeing Special Attention
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial uscg.mil.
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Service Bulletin 757–53–0097, Revision 1, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
dated January 6, 2011; or Boeing Special
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740; I. Table of Abbreviations
Attention Service Bulletin 757–53–0097,
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
Revision 2, dated July 28, 2015. CFR Code of Federal Regulations
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance referenced service information at the FAA, COTP Captain of the Port
(AMOCs) Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind DHS Department of Homeland Security
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information FR Federal Register
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the on the availability of this material at the
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

FAA, call 425–227–1221. § Section
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if U.S.C. United States Code
requested using the procedures found in 14 Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 7,
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 2017. II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
send your request to your principal inspector Michael Kaszycki, Basis
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane On April 11, 2017, Gilligan’s Pier of
appropriate. If sending information directly
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Newburg, MD, notified the Coast Guard
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in [FR Doc. 2017–07938 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am] that it will be conducting a short-
paragraph (o)(1) of this AD. Information may BILLING CODE 4910–13–P duration aerial fireworks display at 9

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:02 May 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MYP1.SGM 05MYP1

21154 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules

p.m. on June 17, 2017. Details of the and benefits, of reducing costs, of CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
proposed event were provided to the harmonizing rules, and of promoting not retaliate against small entities that
Coast Guard on April 26, 2017. The flexibility. This NPRM has not been question or complain about this
fireworks display will be conducted by designated a ‘‘significant regulatory proposed rule or any policy or action of
Innovative Pyrotechnic Concepts, LLC action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. the Coast Guard.
and launched from a barge located in Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
the Potomac River, in Charles County reviewed by the Office of Management C. Collection of Information
near Newburg, MD. In the event of and Budget. This proposed rule would not call for
inclement weather, the fireworks This regulatory action determination a new collection of information under
display will be scheduled for June 24, is based on the size, location, duration, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
2017. Hazards from fireworks displays and time-of-day of the safety zone. (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
include accidental discharge of Vessel traffic would be able to safely
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and transit around this safety zone which
Governments
falling hot embers or other debris. The would impact a small designated area of
Captain of the Port (COTP) has the Potomac River for 21⁄2 hours during A rule has implications for federalism
determined that potential hazards the evening when vessel traffic is under Executive Order 13132,
associated with the fireworks to be used normally low. Moreover, the Coast Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
in this display would be a safety Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to effect on the States, on the relationship
concern for anyone within a 200-yard Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel between the national government and
radius of the fireworks discharge site. 16 about the zone. the States, or on the distribution of
The purpose of this rulemaking is to power and responsibilities among the
B. Impact on Small Entities various levels of government. We have
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within 200-yard radius The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this proposed rule under that
of the barge before, during, and after the 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Order and have determined that it is
scheduled event. The Coast Guard requires Federal agencies to consider consistent with the fundamental
proposes this rulemaking under the potential impact of regulations on federalism principles and preemption
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. small entities during rulemaking. The requirements described in Executive
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Order 13132.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule businesses, not-for-profit organizations Also, this proposed rule does not have
The COTP proposes to establish a that are independently owned and tribal implications under Executive
safety zone from 8:30 p.m. through 10 operated and are not dominant in their Order 13175, Consultation and
p.m. on June 17, 2017, and if necessary fields, and governmental jurisdictions Coordination with Indian Tribal
due to inclement weather, from 8:30 with populations of less than 50,000. Governments, because it would not have
p.m. through 10 p.m. on June 24, 2017. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. a substantial direct effect on one or
The safety zone would include all 605(b) that this proposed rule would not more Indian tribes, on the relationship
navigable waters of the Potomac River, have a significant economic impact on between the Federal Government and
within 200 yards radius of the fireworks a substantial number of small entities. Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
barge in approximate position latitude While the precise number of small power and responsibilities between the
38°23′45.2″ N., longitude 076°59′31.8″ entities impacted is unknown, this Federal Government and Indian tribes.
W., located near Newburg, MD. The section of the Potomac normally has a If you believe this proposed rule has
duration of the safety zone is intended low number of vessels transiting the implications for federalism or Indian
to ensure the safety of vessels and these area planned for the safety zone, during tribes, please contact the person listed
navigable waters before, during, and the enforcement period. Although, some in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
after the scheduled 9 p.m. fireworks owners or operators of vessels intending CONTACT section.
display. No vessel or person would be to transit the safety zone may be small
entities, for the reasons stated in section E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the IV.A above this proposed rule would The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
COTP or a designated representative. not have a significant economic impact of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
The regulatory text we are proposing on any vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
appears at the end of this document. If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
IV. Regulatory Analyses jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
We developed this proposed rule after and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
considering numerous statutes and significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of
Executive orders related to rulemaking. please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Below we summarize our analyses ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
based on a number of these statutes and qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
Executive orders and we discuss First this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the
Amendment rights of protestors. Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this
Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 we want to assist small entities in F. Environment
direct agencies to assess the costs and understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
benefits of available regulatory rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland
alternatives and, if regulation is organization, or governmental Security Management Directive 023–01
necessary, to select regulatory jurisdiction and you have questions and Commandant Instruction
approaches that maximize net benefits. concerning its provisions or options for M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the compliance, please contact the person Guard in complying with the National
importance of quantifying both costs listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:02 May 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MYP1.SGM 05MYP1

Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:39:54
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:39:54

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 5, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, Sector Maryland- National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 21153
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 21153 - Safety Zone; Potomac River, Newburg, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 86 (May 5, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard