82 FR 21745 - Safety Zone; Hope Chest Buffalo Niagara Dragon Boat Festival, Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 89 (May 10, 2017)

Page Range		21745-21747
FR Document		2017-09483

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Buffalo River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Buffalo River Works, Buffalo, NY, during the Hope Chest Buffalo Niagara Dragon Boat Festival on June 17, 2017, which includes boat races. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from passing through the safety zone during race heats unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 89 (Wednesday, May 10, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 10, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21745-21747]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0275]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Hope Chest Buffalo Niagara Dragon Boat Festival, 
Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone 
for certain waters of the Buffalo River. This action is necessary to 
provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Buffalo 
River Works, Buffalo, NY, during the Hope Chest Buffalo Niagara Dragon 
Boat Festival on June 17, 2017, which includes boat races. This 
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from passing 
through the safety zone during race heats unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port Buffalo or a designated representative. We invite 
your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before May 30, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0275 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of 
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9322, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On December 08, 2016, the Hope Chest Buffalo (Lumanina Crop) 
notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a series of dragon 
boat races from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on June 17, 2017. The dragon boat 
races are to take place in the Buffalo River behind the Buffalo River 
Works restaurant in a 300 meter long course consisting of 4 lanes, each 
10 meters wide in Buffalo, NY. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) 
has determined that a boating race event on a navigable waterway will 
pose a significant risk to participants and the boating public.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels 
and the navigable waters within the race course during heats of the 
scheduled event. Vessel traffic will be allowed to pass through the 
safety zone between heats. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking 
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 7:45 a.m. to 5:15 
p.m. on June 17, 2017, that would be effective and enforced 
intermittently. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters of the 
Buffalo River; Buffalo, NY starting at position 42[deg] 52' 12.60'' N. 
and 078[deg] 52' 17.64'' W. then Southeast to 42[deg] 52' 3.17'' N. and 
078[deg] 52' 12.43'' W. then East to 42[deg] 52' 3.68'' N. and 078[deg] 
52' 10.35'' W. then Northwest to 42[deg] 52' 13.41'' N. and 078[deg] 
52' 16.57'' W. then returning to the point

[[Page 21746]]

of origin. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of 
vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the 
scheduled 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. racing event. Vessels will be permitted to 
pass through the safety zone intermittently during the event as allowed 
by the COTP or the on-scene representative. No vessel or person would 
be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from 
the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are 
proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to 
reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for 
every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be 
identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be 
prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory 
action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not 
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is 
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's 
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the 
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic 
would be able to safely transit through this safety zone in between 
race heats which would impact a small designated area of the Buffalo 
River for one day. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the 
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the 
establishment of a safety zone for one day during intermittent periods. 
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review 
under section 2.B.2, and Figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g) of the 
Instruction. Paragraph 24(g) pertains to the establishing, 
disestablishing, or changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or 
safety zones. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) 
supporting this determination is available in the docket where 
indicated under the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any

[[Page 21747]]

comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0275 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0275  Safety Zone; Hope Chest Buffalo Niagara Dragon Boat 
Festival, Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY

    (a) Location. This zone will cover all navigable waters of the 
Buffalo River; Buffalo, NY starting at position 42[deg]52'12.60'' N. 
and 078[deg]52'17.64'' W. then Southeast to 42[deg]52'3.17'' N. and 
078[deg]52'12.43'' W. then East to 42[deg]52'3.68'' N. and 
078[deg]52'10.35'' W. then Northwest to 42[deg]52'13.41'' N. and 
078[deg]52'16.57'' W. then returning to the point of origin.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This regulation will be enforced 
intermittently on June 17, 2017 from 7:45 a.m. until 5:15 p.m.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: May 4, 2017.
J.S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2017-09483 Filed 5-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

21746 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 10, 2017 / Proposed Rules

of origin. The duration of the zone is Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel various levels of government. We have
intended to ensure the safety of vessels 16 about the zone, and the rule would analyzed this proposed rule under that
and these navigable waters before, allow vessels to seek permission to enter Order and have determined that it is
during, and after the scheduled 8 a.m. the zone. consistent with the fundamental
to 5 p.m. racing event. Vessels will be federalism principles and preemption
B. Impact on Small Entities
permitted to pass through the safety requirements described in Executive
zone intermittently during the event as The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132.
allowed by the COTP or the on-scene 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have
representative. No vessel or person requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive
would be permitted to enter the safety the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and
zone without obtaining permission from small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal
the COTP or a designated term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have
representative. The regulatory text we businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or
are proposing appears at the end of this that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship
document. operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
IV. Regulatory Analyses power and responsibilities between the
with populations of less than 50,000.
We developed this proposed rule after The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes.
considering numerous statutes and 605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has
Executive orders related to rulemaking. have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian
Below we summarize our analyses a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed
based on a number of these statutes and While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Executive orders and we discuss First vessels intending to transit the safety CONTACT section.
Amendment rights of protestors. zone may be small entities, for the
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
A. Regulatory Planning and Review reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
direct agencies to assess the costs and vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
benefits of available regulatory If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
alternatives and, if regulation is organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
necessary, to select regulatory jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
approaches that maximize net benefits. and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of
importance of quantifying both costs please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
and benefits, of reducing costs, of ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
harmonizing rules, and of promoting qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the
(‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this
Regulatory Costs’’), directs agencies to Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
reduce regulation and control regulatory Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), F. Environment
costs and provides that ‘‘for every one we want to assist small entities in
new regulation issued, at least two prior understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
regulations be identified for elimination, rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland
and that the cost of planned regulations organization, or governmental Security Management Directive 023–01
be prudently managed and controlled jurisdiction and you have questions and Commandant Instruction
through a budgeting process.’’ concerning its provisions or options for M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
This NPRM has not been designated compliance, please contact the person Guard in complying with the National
a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the not retaliate against small entities that preliminary determination that this
Office of Management and Budget. question or complain about this action is one of a category of actions that
As this rule is not a significant proposed rule or any policy or action of do not individually or cumulatively
regulatory action, this rule is exempt the Coast Guard. have a significant effect on the human
from the requirements of Executive environment. This proposed rule
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum C. Collection of Information involves the establishment of a safety
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing This proposed rule would not call for zone for one day during intermittent
Section 2 of the Executive Order of a new collection of information under periods. Normally such actions are
January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 categorically excluded from further
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). review under section 2.B.2, and Figure
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). 2–1, paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction.
This regulatory action determination D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Paragraph 24(g) pertains to the
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

is based on the size, location, duration, Governments establishing, disestablishing, or
and time-of-day of the safety zone. A rule has implications for federalism changing Regulated Navigation Areas
Vessel traffic would be able to safely under Executive Order 13132, and security or safety zones. A
transit through this safety zone in Federalism, if it has a substantial direct preliminary Record of Environmental
between race heats which would impact effect on the States, on the relationship Consideration (REC) supporting this
a small designated area of the Buffalo between the national government and determination is available in the docket
River for one day. Moreover, the Coast the States, or on the distribution of where indicated under the ADDRESSES
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to power and responsibilities among the section of this preamble. We seek any

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:10 May 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM 10MYP1

Document Created: 2017-05-10 00:00:42
Document Modified: 2017-05-10 00:00:42

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 30, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716- 843-9322, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 21745
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 21745 - Safety Zone; Hope Chest Buffalo Niagara Dragon Boat Festival, Buffalo River, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 89 (May 10, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard