82 FR 21866 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Compression Forums
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 89 (May 10, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 89 (May 10, 2017)
| Page Range | 21866-21871 | |
| FR Document | 2017-09424 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 10, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 21866-21871] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-09424] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-80595; File No. SR-CBOE-2017-035] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Compression Forums May 4, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on April 21, 2017, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes changes to Rule 6.56 (Compression Forums) to: (1) Make all existing positions in series of S&P 500[supreg] Index (``SPX'') options \5\ eligible to be identified as compression-list positions (and therefore eligible for a fee rebate if closed in open outcry in a compression forum); (2) change the way in which the Exchange will publish its compression-list positions file; (3) amend the rules with respect to requirements for solicited transactions executed through a compression forum; and (4) clarify additional portions of the rule text. The Exchange's proposal is intended to make it easier for TPHs to efficiently close positions in series of SPX options at the end of each calendar month in order to mitigate the effects of capital constraints on market participants and help ensure continued depth of liquidity in the SPX options market. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Including groups of series with both ticker symbols SPX and SPXW. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Background SEC Rule 15c3-1 (Net Capital Requirements for Brokers or Dealers) (``Net Capital Rules'') requires registered broker-dealers, unless otherwise excepted, to maintain certain specified minimum levels of capital.\6\ The Net Capital Rules are designed to protect securities customers, counterparties, and creditors by requiring that broker- dealers have sufficient liquid resources on hand, at all times, to meet their financial obligations. Notably, hedged positions, including offsetting futures and options contract positions, result in certain net capital requirement reductions under the Net Capital Rules.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-1. \7\ In addition, the Net Capital Rules permit various offsets under which a percentage of an option position's gain at any one valuation point is allowed to offset another position's loss at the same valuation point (e.g. vertical spreads). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject to certain exceptions, CBOE Clearing Trading Permit Holders (``CTPHs'') \8\ are subject to the Net Capital Rules. However, a subset of CTPHs are subsidiaries of U.S. bank holding companies, which, due to their affiliations with their parent U.S. bank holding companies, must comply with additional bank regulatory capital requirements pursuant to rulemaking required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.\9\ Pursuant to this mandate, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have approved a regulatory capital framework for subsidiaries of U.S. bank holding company clearing firms.\10\ Generally, these rules impose higher minimum capital requirements, more restrictive capital eligibility standards, and higher asset risk weights than were previously mandated for CTPHs that are subsidiaries of U.S. bank holding companies under the Net Capital Rules. Furthermore, the new rules do not permit deductions for hedged securities or offsetting options positions.\11\ Rather, capital charges under these standards are, in large part, based on the aggregate notional value of short positions regardless of offsets. As a result, in general, CTPHs must hold substantially more bank regulatory capital than would otherwise be required under the Net Capital Rules. The impact of these regulatory capital rules are compounded [[Page 21867]] in the SPX options market due to the large notional value of SPX contracts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ All CBOE CTPHs must also be clearing members of The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC''). \9\ H.R. 4173 (amending section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78c(a))). \10\ 12 CFR 50; 79 FR 61440 (Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement Standards). \11\ Many options strategies, including relatively simple strategies often used by retail customers and more sophisticated strategies used by market-makers and institutions, are risk-limited strategies or options spread strategies that employ offsets or hedges to achieve certain investment outcomes. Such strategies typically involve the purchase and sale of multiple options (and may be coupled with purchases or sales of the underlying securities), executed simultaneously as part of the same strategy. In many cases, the potential market exposure of these strategies is limited and defined. Whereas regulatory capital requirements have historically reflected the risk-limited nature of carrying offsetting positions, these positions may now be subject to higher regulatory capital requirements. Various factors, including administration costs; transaction fees; and limited market demand or counterparty interest, however, may discourage market participants from closing these positions even though many market participants likely would prefer to close the positions rather than carry them to expiration. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that these higher regulatory capital requirements have the potential to impact liquidity in the SPX options market by limiting the amount of capital CTPHs can allocate to their clients' transactions. Specifically, the rules may cause CTPHs to impose stricter position limits on their client clearing members, which include CBOE Market-Makers. Such position limits may impact the liquidity Market-Makers might supply in the SPX market, and this impact may be compounded when a CTPH has multiple Market-Maker client accounts, each having largely risk-neutral portfolio holdings.\12\ The Exchange believes that permitting Market-Makers and Floor Brokers (for their own proprietary accounts or for the account of another on an agency basis) to efficiently close existing SPX options positions through modified open outcry trading procedures on the Exchange floor may assist CTPHs and TPHs to address bank regulatory capital requirements and would likely have a beneficial effect on continued liquidity in the SPX options market without adversely affecting market quality. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ Several TPHs have indicated to the Exchange that the heightened bank regulatory requirements could impact their ability to provide consistent liquidity in the SPX options market unless they are able to efficiently close their positions in SPX. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In order to mitigate the potential negative effects of these additional bank regulatory capital requirements and foster continued liquidity in the SPX options market in a manner consistent with the requirements, the Exchange recently adopted Rule 6.56 pursuant to which TPHs can reduce (or ``compress'') existing positions in SPX at the end of each calendar month more efficiently through trading in an open outcry compression forum.\13\ The Exchange believes that making available these periodic trading forums, which allow for closing transactions in SPX options series to occur at reduced transaction fees likely contributes to additional liquidity and continued competitiveness in the SPX market and promotes more efficient capital deployment in light of bank regulatory capital requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79610 (December 20, 2016), 81 FR 95219 (December 27, 2016) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Compression of S&P 500(R) Index Options Positions) (SR-CBOE-2016- 090). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under current Rule 6.56, on the final three business days of each calendar month, the Exchange holds compression forums in the SPX trading crowd. Beforehand, in order to facilitate TPHs finding counterparty offsets against which they can trade closing positions, currently, TPHs may submit lists of existing SPX positions (with either a required capital charge equal to the minimum capital charge under the risk-based haircut calculator provided by the OCC or comprised of option series with a delta of ten (10) or less) to the Exchange that they wish to close during a compression forum. The Exchange then aggregates these positions into a single list containing the series in which opposite (long/short) interest was submitted to the Exchange. Prior to the open of trading on the third-to-last business day of each calendar month (i.e. the first day of the month on which a compression forum is held), the Exchange makes available to all TPHs on its Web site the aggregate two-sided list of compression-list positions for those series (``compression-list positions file''). In addition, TPHs that submit compression positions list to the Exchange receive a compression-list positions file containing the names of the TPHs that contributed to the file, including contact information for each TPH's designated point of contact. This list does not identify the specific positions that any TPH has submitted to the Exchange. The Exchange then holds open outcry ``compression forums'' in which all TPHs may participate whether or not they submitted positions for inclusion in the compression-list position file. Currently, trades executed during compression forums are subject to trading rules applicable to trading in SPX during Regular Trading Hours, including manner of bids and offers and allocation and priority rules, except: (1) Only closing transactions in SPX options (including compression- list positions) may be executed during a compression forum; and (2) the minimum increment for each series is $0.01 during a compression forum. TPHs that trade positions previously submitted to the Exchange on a compression list may then take advantage of the compression-list position fee rebate on portions of a transaction that involve their compression-list positions, which are executed through a compression forum. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.56 to enhance the effectiveness and utility of its compression forums process for market participants. Based on research, past compression forum results, and anecdotal evidence, the Exchange believes that the number of SPX contracts closed in past compression forums is only a small fraction of the number of SPX contracts that TPHs would like to close out because of bank regulatory capital-related restraints. This is due, at least in part, to TPHs submitting compression-list positions that include fewer than the total SPX contracts they would like to close. These limited TPH compression-list positions yield fewer series in which the Exchange has received two-sided interest (for publication in the compression- list positions file), and only a fraction of that two-sided interest has been closed out during previous compression forums.\14\ The Exchange believes that TPHs are not taking advantage of the compression forum process, in part, because the process is too limited in terms of which positions have been determined to be eligible compression-list positions (and therefore eligible for the related fee rebate). Accordingly, the Exchange proposes certain amendments to Rule 6.56 to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the compression forums process. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ In the months since the adoption of Rule 6.56, of the compression-list positions submitted to the Exchange, less than 16% had offsetting interest, and of those positions, less than 10% were actually closed in transactions through a compression forum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposal The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.56 to remove the requirement that compression-list positions must be positions with either: (1) A required capital charge equal to the minimum capital charge under the risk-based haircut calculator provided by the OCC or (2) comprised of option series with a delta of ten (10) or less. In addition, the Exchange proposes to change the manner in which it publishes the compression-list positions file and amend the rules with respect to requirements for solicited transactions executed through a compression forum. Finally, the Exchange proposes to make certain non-substantive changes to clarify the text of Rule 6.56. The Exchange believes that these proposed amendments to Rule 6.56 would enhance the effectiveness and utility of its compression forums process. Under current Rule 6.56(a)(1), prior to the close of Regular Trading Hours on the fourth to last business day of each calendar month, in a manner and format determined by the Exchange, a TPH may provide the Exchange with a list of open SPX options positions with either a required capital charge equal to the minimum capital charge under the risk-based haircut calculator provided by the OCC or comprised of option series with a delta of ten (10) or less that it would like to close during the compression forum for that calendar month (``compression-list positions''). Compression-list positions may consist [[Page 21868]] of multi-legged positions in series of SPX options, which satisfy these conditions. In turn, the Exchange rebates transaction fees for trading these positions against other closing SPX options positions in a compression forum so long as a rebate request form is submitted by the TPH in compliance with the parameters outlined in the Exchange's Fees Schedule.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79745 (January 5, 2017), 82 FR 3379 (January 11, 2017) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule) (SR-CBOE-2016-094). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to amend the definition of compression-list positions to include any SPX option position submitted to the Exchange pursuant to Rule 6.56(a)(1) that a TPH wishes to close through a compression forum. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to remove the text from paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 6.56 that requires a compression- list position to either have a required capital charge equal to the minimum capital charge under the risk-based haircut calculator provided by the OCC or be comprised of an option series with a delta of ten (10) or less. Accordingly, the proposed rule text of the first sentence of Rule 6.56(a)(1) would provide that prior to the close of Regular Trading Hours on the fourth to last business day of each calendar month, in a manner and format determined by the Exchange, a TPH may provide the Exchange with a list of open SPX options positions that it would like to close through the compression forum for that calendar month (``compression-list positions''). This proposed change would also obviate the need for the provision that compression-list positions may consist of multi-legged positions in series of SPX options, which satisfy the conditions set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 6.56. Under the current rule, TPHs may use offsetting positions to create a multi-leg position with a required capital charge equal to the minimum capital charge under the risk-based haircut calculator provided by the OCC. If the requirement that the position have a required capital charge equal to the minimum capital charge under the risk-based haircut calculator provided by the OCC were eliminated, then there would be no need to submit a multi-leg position to make it qualify as a compression-list position under Rule 6.56(a)(1); any leg of any SPX position on its own would qualify without exception. Thus, under the proposed rule, TPHs may simply submit a list of single-leg positions to the Exchange in order to qualify for a rebate of the fees for any associated transactions. The Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage more market participants to close out SPX positions through compression forums and help ensure continued depth of liquidity in the SPX options market. Based on the Exchange's understanding of the number of SPX contracts that TPHs would like to close out each month for bank regulatory capital-related purposes, the comparatively small numbers of contracts submitted to the Exchange on average per month as compression-list positions, and the even smaller number of SPX contracts closed during compression forums, the Exchange believes that the definition of compression-list positions ought be expanded to include any open SPX options positions that a TPH wishes to close during a compression forum (and thus be eligible for a fee rebate). Although the parameters in current Rule 6.56(a)(1) were put in place as a mechanism for market participants to close out-of-the-money (``OTM'') positions that might be held until expiration because of the cost of trading out of them and despite the large capital charges associated with such positions, the Exchange believes that market participants and, in particular, Market-Makers have a need for a mechanism that allows them to easily close other less deep OTM SPX positions and even in-the-money (``ITM'') positions at month's end in order to free up capital that could then be deployed to provide additional liquidity in the SPX options market. The Exchange also proposes to make changes to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 6.56 regarding the dissemination of the compression-list positions file. Under current Rule 6.56, prior to the open of Regular Trading Hours on the third to last business day of each calendar month, the Exchange makes available to all TPHs an aggregate two-sided (long/ short) list including each series for which both long and short positions have been submitted to the Exchange pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) and the size on each side in each of those series (``compression-list positions file''). Based on anecdotal evidence, the Exchange believes that TPHs are submitting fractions of positions that they would like to compress to the Exchange as compression-list positions because of the format in which the Exchange publishes the compression-list positions file. Specifically, the Exchange believes TPHs are concerned about revealing large position imbalances and thus are hesitant to submit their full eligible compression-list positions to the Exchange. This results in an overall lowering of the compression forum efficiency, fewer SPX positions closed, and less reduced capital that could be used to create and maintain greater liquidity in the SPX options market. If the Exchange were to only publish the offsetting size of long and short positions in each series, however, these concerns would be alleviated. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend paragraph (a)(2) to provide that it will publish only up to the size of the offsetting compression-list positions in each series for which both long and short positions have been submitted to the Exchange. Specifically, the Exchange proposed to amend paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 6.56 to provide that prior to the open of Regular Trading Hours on the third to last business day of each calendar month, the Exchange will make available to all TPHs a list including each series for which both long and short compression-list positions have been submitted to the Exchange and the size of the offsetting compression-list positions in those series. The difference between the current and proposed compression-list positions file publication methodologies can be demonstrated through the following example, which assumes that prior to the close of trading on the fourth to last business day of a particular calendar month, the Exchange receives the following compression-list positions from TPHs XYZ, ABC, and 123: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expiration Market participant Symbol date Strike Call/put Size ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2000 C -125 XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2005 P 2500 XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2110 P -75 XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2200 P -166 XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2210 C 250 XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2220 C 2000 [[Page 21869]] XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2300 C 2500 XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2350 C -652 XYZ TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2360 C -1425 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expiration Market participant Symbol date Strike Call/put Size ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABC TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2000 C -76 ABC TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2005 P -105 ABC TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2050 P -166 ABC TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2250 C -4000 ABC TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2360 C 1322 ABC TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2500 P -50 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expiration Market participant Symbol date Strike Call/put Size ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2000 C 50 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2110 P -105 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2220 C -200 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2250 P -400 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2250 C 107 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2300 C -200 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2350 P -62 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2360 C -5000 123 TRADING..................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2500 P -300 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assuming that each of the positions listed above qualify as compression-list positions under Rule 6.56(a)(1), under the current rule, the Exchange would compile the compression-list positions file by aggregating the long and short positions in each series for which both long and short positions had been submitted to the Exchange as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expiration Symbol date Strike Call/put Long size Short size ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPXW............................ 6/2/2017 2000 C 50 -201 SPXW............................ 6/2/2017 2005 P 2500 -105 SPXW............................ 6/2/2017 2220 C 2000 -200 SPXW............................ 6/2/2017 2250 C 107 -4000 SPXW............................ 6/2/2017 2300 C 2500 -200 SPXW............................ 6/2/2017 2360 C 1322 -6425 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the Exchanges' proposal to show only up to the offsetting size in each series for which both long and short positions have been submitted to the Exchange, assuming the same compression-list positions above were submitted to the Exchange, the Exchange would publish the following compression-list positions filing: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expiration Symbol date Strike Call/put Size ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPXW................................. 6/2/2017 2000..................... C 50 SPXW................................. 6/2/2017 2005..................... P 105 SPXW................................. 6/2/2017 2200 [sic]............... C 200 SPXW................................. 6/2/2017 2250..................... C 107 SPXW................................. 6/2/2017 2300..................... C 200 SPXW................................. 6/2/2017 2360..................... C 1322 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As demonstrated in the examples above, using the current method for compiling the compression-list positions file, several large position imbalances would be shown to market participants, whereas under the proposed method for compiling the compression-list positions file, only the net size would be shown. The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule 6.56(c) to provide that TPHs may solicit a TPH or a non-TPH customer or broker-dealer to transact through a compression forum in accordance with the provisions of this Rule and the solicited transaction requirements contained in Rule 6.9 and that trades executed through a compression forum pursuant to Rule 6.56 and otherwise in compliance with the Rules, including, but not limited to Rule 6.9 will not be deemed prearranged trades. Currently, Rule 6.56(c) provides that TPHs may communicate with other TPHs to determine: (1) A TPH's open single-legged or multi-legged SPX position, including side and size, and/or (2) whether a TPH anticipates participating in a compression forum at a particular date and time, but that during these communications, TPHs may not discuss the price of a potential transaction involving these positions during a compression forum. This restriction is stricter than the Exchange's normal trading rules, which, under Rule 6.9 (Solicited Transactions), permit price discovery. The Exchange believes permitting solicited transactions that include discussion of price in accordance with Rule 6.9 may enhance the compression forum process. The [[Page 21870]] proposed rule change also harmonizes the compression forum rules with requirements for solicited transactions under Rule 6.9 and the provision of Rule 6.56(b), which provides that trades executed through compression forums are subject to normal SPX trading rules, apart from the specifically enumerated exceptions as provided in Rule 6.56(b)(1) and (2). The Exchange believes that this amendment would further align the compression forum trading rules with normal SPX trading rules, which would clarify the Rules and eliminate both potential confusion and regulatory discrepancy. The Exchange proposes to further amend the text of Rule 6.56(c) to provide that trades executed through a compression forum pursuant to Rule 6.56 and otherwise in compliance with the Rules, including but not limited to Rule 6.9 (including a discussion of price as permitted by that rule), will not be deemed prearranged trades.\16\ The Exchange proposes to make corresponding changes to Rule 6.56(b) to make clear that all normal SPX trading rules apply to transactions executed through compression forums, including but not limited to the solicited transaction rules in Rule 6.9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ Under the Exchange's policy concerning prearranged trading, TPHs are cautioned that any purchase or sale, transaction or series of transactions, coupled with an agreement, arrangement or understanding, directly or indirectly to reverse such transaction which is not done for a legitimate economic purpose or without subjecting the transactions to market risk, violates Exchange Rules and may be inconsistent with various provisions of the Act and rules thereunder. All transactions must be effected in accordance with applicable trading rules, must be subject to risk of the market, and must be reported for dissemination. In addition, under the Exchange's policy, TPHs are reminded that Section 9(a)(1) of the Act provides in relevant part that it shall be unlawful for any member of a national securities exchange, for the purpose of creating a false or misleading appearance of active trading in any security registered on a national securities exchange or a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market for any such security, (A) to effect any transaction in such security which involves no change in the beneficial ownership thereof, or (B) to enter an order or orders for the purchase of such security with the knowledge that an order or orders substantially the same size, at substantially the same time, and at substantially the same price, for the sale of any such security, has been or will be entered by or for the same or different parties. See CBOE Regulatory Circular RG16-190 (Prearranged Trades). In this regard, Rule 6.56(c) is not intended as an absolute safe harbor from prearranged trading prohibitions, but is instead intended to provide that, the act of soliciting another party to transact through a compression forum will not be deemed to be prearranged trading provided that the transaction is otherwise executed in accordance with the Rules, including, but not limited to, the Exchange's solicitation rules and open outcry trading procedures, as modified by Rule 6.56(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also proposes to make several clarifying changes to the rule text of Rule 6.56. In paragraphs (a)(1), (b), (b)(1), and (c), the Exchange proposes to change the word ``during'' to ``through'' to make clear that the rules apply to transactions executed through the compression forum process, rather than transactions in series of SPX options that may be executed during the hours in which a compression forum is taking place, but outside of the compression forum process. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.56(a)(4) to delete the word ``conduct'' and replace it with the words ``make available.'' Currently, Rule 6.56(a)(4) provides that the Exchange will conduct an open outcry ``compression forum'' in which all TPHs may participate on each of the last three business days of every calendar month at a location on the trading floor determined by the Exchange. The Exchange, however, does not conduct or participate in the compression forum process. Rather, the Exchange provides a locale for the compression forums or ``makes available'' compression forums to TPHs. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes changes to Rule 6.56(a)(4) to make this point clear. Finally, the Exchange proposes changes to paragraph (b)(2) of Rule 6.56 to make clear that the minimum increment for bids and offers represented in open outcry in a compression forum is $0.01, both for single series positions and with respect to complex orders 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \18\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \19\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \19\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is reasonable, equitable, and does not unfairly discriminate against any market participants. The Exchange notes that all TPHs with open SPX positions submit compression-list positions (that would be eligible for a fee rebate) in accordance with the proposed rule change. In fact, the proposed rule change would encourage participation by additional participants as any market participant holding an SPX position could now submit positions eligible compression-list positions (that would therefore qualify for a fee rebate), rather than only those with positions meeting certain limiting criteria. Any market participant with an open SPX positions could participate in a compression forum (including customers through CBOE Floor Brokers), as they would for any other SPX trade. Participation in compression forums, as well as advanced submission of compression-list positions, is optional, and TPHs may also continue to trade open SPX positions during normal trading. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the Act in that it seeks to foster liquidity in the SPX options market in light of the bank regulatory capital requirements. As described above, the Exchange believes that the new bank regulatory capital requirements could potentially limit the amount of capital CTPHs can allocate to their clients' transactions, which in turn, may impact liquidity, particularly in the SPX market. Specifically, the rules may cause CTPHs to impose stricter position limits on their clients, including Market-Makers. The Exchange believes that permitting TPHs to reduce open interest in offsetting SPX options positions in the manner set out in Rule 6.56 would likely contribute to the availability of liquidity in the SPX options. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule would serve to protect investors by helping to ensure consistent continued depth of liquidity in the SPX options market. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act, because the proposed procedure is consistent with its current rules. The proposed rule would direct that all trading through compression forums be conducted in accordance with normal SPX trading rules and thus, in the same manner as transactions during normal SPX trading, except that they must be closing only and may be in penny increments. In particular, the proposed changes to Rule 6.56(b) and (c) would eliminate discrepancies in the [[Page 21871]] trading rules that apply to trading through compression forums and normal SPX trading rules by harmonizing the solicited transactions rules and making trading through compression forums subject to the rules set forth in Rule 6.9. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes to Rule 6.56 would eliminate potential confusion caused by regulatory discrepancies in the Rules and provide additional clarity, specifically with respect to the application of the solicited transaction rules. The Exchange believes that the adoption of clear, transparent, and consistent rules is in the best interests of both investors and the general public. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the Act because it applies to all market participants with positions that meet the eligible criteria in the same manner. The proposed change would encourage the closing of positions, which, once closed, may serve to alleviate the capital requirement constraints on TPHs and improve overall market liquidity by freeing capital currently tied up in certain SPX positions. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed rule change applies only to the trading of SPX options, which are exclusively- listed on CBOE. To the extent that the proposed changes make the Exchange a more attractive marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such market participants are eligible to participant through CBOE TPHs. Furthermore, as stated in Item 3(b) above, submission of lists of positions for compression is completely voluntary, open to all TPHs, and non-binding, in that submission of a list does not require a TPH to trade any position or even represent any position through a compression forum. Lists of positions will be made available to all TPHs simply alert TPHs to certain SPX positions that other TPHs are interested in closing at the end of each calendar month. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; B. impose any significant burden on competition; and C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \20\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \21\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-CBOE-2017-035 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2017-035. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2017-035, and should be submitted on or before May 31, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\22\ Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-09424 Filed 5-9-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![21866 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 10, 2017 / Notices
Section 17A of the Act 37 and the rules II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Subject to certain exceptions, CBOE
and regulations thereunder. Statement of the Purpose of, and Clearing Trading Permit Holders
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule (‘‘CTPHs’’) 8 are subject to the Net
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that Change Capital Rules. However, a subset of
proposed rule change SR–NSCC–2017– In its filing with the Commission, the CTPHs are subsidiaries of U.S. bank
001 be, and hereby is, Approved.38 Exchange included statements holding companies, which, due to their
For the Commission, by the Division of concerning the purpose of and basis for affiliations with their parent U.S. bank
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated the proposed rule change and discussed holding companies, must comply with
authority.39 any comments it received on the additional bank regulatory capital
Eduardo A. Aleman, proposed rule change. The text of these requirements pursuant to rulemaking
Assistant Secretary. statements may be examined at the required under the Dodd–Frank Wall
[FR Doc. 2017–09425 Filed 5–9–17; 8:45 am] places specified in Item IV below. The Street Reform and Consumer Protection
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Exchange has prepared summaries, set Act.9 Pursuant to this mandate, the
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of Board of Governors of the Federal
the most significant aspects of such Reserve System, the Office of the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE statements. Comptroller of the Currency, and the
COMMISSION A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Statement of the Purpose of, and the have approved a regulatory capital
[Release No. 34–80595; File No. SR–CBOE–
2017–035] Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule framework for subsidiaries of U.S. bank
Change holding company clearing firms.10
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Generally, these rules impose higher
1. Purpose
Chicago Board Options Exchange, minimum capital requirements, more
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and The Exchange proposes changes to restrictive capital eligibility standards,
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule 6.56 (Compression Forums) to: (1) and higher asset risk weights than were
Rule Change Relating to Compression Make all existing positions in series of previously mandated for CTPHs that are
Forums S&P 500® Index (‘‘SPX’’) options 5 subsidiaries of U.S. bank holding
eligible to be identified as compression- companies under the Net Capital Rules.
May 4, 2017. list positions (and therefore eligible for Furthermore, the new rules do not
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the a fee rebate if closed in open outcry in
permit deductions for hedged securities
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the a compression forum); (2) change the
or offsetting options positions.11 Rather,
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 way in which the Exchange will publish
its compression-list positions file; (3) capital charges under these standards
notice is hereby given that on April 21,
amend the rules with respect to are, in large part, based on the aggregate
2017, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or requirements for solicited transactions notional value of short positions
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and executed through a compression forum; regardless of offsets. As a result, in
Exchange Commission (the and (4) clarify additional portions of the general, CTPHs must hold substantially
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule rule text. The Exchange’s proposal is more bank regulatory capital than
change as described in Items I and II intended to make it easier for TPHs to would otherwise be required under the
below, which Items have been prepared efficiently close positions in series of Net Capital Rules. The impact of these
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the SPX options at the end of each calendar regulatory capital rules are compounded
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ month in order to mitigate the effects of
proposed rule change pursuant to capital constraints on market position’s gain at any one valuation point is
participants and help ensure continued allowed to offset another position’s loss at the same
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and valuation point (e.g. vertical spreads).
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The depth of liquidity in the SPX options 8 All CBOE CTPHs must also be clearing members
Commission is publishing this notice to market. of The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’).
solicit comments on the proposed rule Background
9 H.R. 4173 (amending section 3(a) of the
change from interested persons. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) (15
SEC Rule 15c3–1 (Net Capital U.S.C. 78c(a))).
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Requirements for Brokers or Dealers) 10 12 CFR 50; 79 FR 61440 (Liquidity Coverage
Statement of the Terms of Substance of (‘‘Net Capital Rules’’) requires registered Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement Standards).
11 Many options strategies, including relatively
the Proposed Rule Change broker-dealers, unless otherwise simple strategies often used by retail customers and
The text of the proposed rule change excepted, to maintain certain specified more sophisticated strategies used by market-
is available on the Exchange’s Web site minimum levels of capital.6 The Net makers and institutions, are risk-limited strategies
Capital Rules are designed to protect or options spread strategies that employ offsets or
(http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/ hedges to achieve certain investment outcomes.
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at securities customers, counterparties,
Such strategies typically involve the purchase and
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and creditors by requiring that broker- sale of multiple options (and may be coupled with
and at the Commission’s Public dealers have sufficient liquid resources purchases or sales of the underlying securities),
Reference Room. on hand, at all times, to meet their executed simultaneously as part of the same
financial obligations. Notably, hedged strategy. In many cases, the potential market
exposure of these strategies is limited and defined.
37 15
positions, including offsetting futures Whereas regulatory capital requirements have
U.S.C. 78q–1.
and options contract positions, result in historically reflected the risk-limited nature of
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
38 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposals’ impact on certain net capital requirement carrying offsetting positions, these positions may
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 reductions under the Net Capital Rules.7 now be subject to higher regulatory capital
U.S.C. 78c(f). requirements. Various factors, including
39 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). administration costs; transaction fees; and limited
5 Including groups of series with both ticker
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
market demand or counterparty interest, however,
symbols SPX and SPXW. may discourage market participants from closing
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 6 17 CFR 240.15c3–1.
these positions even though many market
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 7 In addition, the Net Capital Rules permit various participants likely would prefer to close the
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). offsets under which a percentage of an option positions rather than carry them to expiration.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:21 May 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_21955/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 10, 2017 / Notices 21869
Market participant Symbol Expiration date Strike Call/put Size
XYZ TRADING ..................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2300 C 2500
XYZ TRADING ..................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2350 C ¥652
XYZ TRADING ..................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2360 C ¥1425
Market participant Symbol Expiration date Strike Call/put Size
ABC TRADING .................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2000 C ¥76
ABC TRADING .................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2005 P ¥105
ABC TRADING .................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2050 P ¥166
ABC TRADING .................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2250 C ¥4000
ABC TRADING .................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2360 C 1322
ABC TRADING .................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2500 P ¥50
Market participant Symbol Expiration date Strike Call/put Size
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2000 C 50
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2110 P ¥105
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2220 C ¥200
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2250 P ¥400
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2250 C 107
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2300 C ¥200
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2350 P ¥62
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2360 C ¥5000
123 TRADING ...................................................................... SPXW 6/2/2017 2500 P ¥300
Assuming that each of the positions the current rule, the Exchange would positions in each series for which both
listed above qualify as compression-list compile the compression-list positions long and short positions had been
positions under Rule 6.56(a)(1), under file by aggregating the long and short submitted to the Exchange as follows:
Symbol Expiration date Strike Call/put Long size Short size
SPXW ................................................................................... 6/2/2017 2000 C 50 ¥201
SPXW ................................................................................... 6/2/2017 2005 P 2500 ¥105
SPXW ................................................................................... 6/2/2017 2220 C 2000 ¥200
SPXW ................................................................................... 6/2/2017 2250 C 107 ¥4000
SPXW ................................................................................... 6/2/2017 2300 C 2500 ¥200
SPXW ................................................................................... 6/2/2017 2360 C 1322 ¥6425
Under the Exchanges’ proposal to short positions have been submitted to submitted to the Exchange, the
show only up to the offsetting size in the Exchange, assuming the same Exchange would publish the following
each series for which both long and compression-list positions above were compression-list positions filing:
Symbol Expiration date Strike Call/put Size
SPXW ................................................................................................................. 6/2/2017 2000 ............ C 50
SPXW ................................................................................................................. 6/2/2017 2005 ............ P 105
SPXW ................................................................................................................. 6/2/2017 2200 [sic] ..... C 200
SPXW ................................................................................................................. 6/2/2017 2250 ............ C 107
SPXW ................................................................................................................. 6/2/2017 2300 ............ C 200
SPXW ................................................................................................................. 6/2/2017 2360 ............ C 1322
As demonstrated in the examples the provisions of this Rule and the in a compression forum at a particular
above, using the current method for solicited transaction requirements date and time, but that during these
compiling the compression-list contained in Rule 6.9 and that trades communications, TPHs may not discuss
positions file, several large position executed through a compression forum the price of a potential transaction
imbalances would be shown to market pursuant to Rule 6.56 and otherwise in involving these positions during a
participants, whereas under the compliance with the Rules, including, compression forum. This restriction is
proposed method for compiling the but not limited to Rule 6.9 will not be stricter than the Exchange’s normal
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
compression-list positions file, only the deemed prearranged trades. Currently, trading rules, which, under Rule 6.9
net size would be shown. Rule 6.56(c) provides that TPHs may (Solicited Transactions), permit price
The Exchange also proposes to amend communicate with other TPHs to discovery. The Exchange believes
Rule 6.56(c) to provide that TPHs may determine: (1) A TPH’s open single- permitting solicited transactions that
solicit a TPH or a non-TPH customer or legged or multi-legged SPX position, include discussion of price in
broker-dealer to transact through a including side and size, and/or (2) accordance with Rule 6.9 may enhance
compression forum in accordance with whether a TPH anticipates participating the compression forum process. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:21 May 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_21955/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 10, 2017 / Notices 21871
trading rules that apply to trading C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s All submissions should refer to File
through compression forums and Statement on Comments on the Number SR–CBOE–2017–035. This file
normal SPX trading rules by Proposed Rule Change Received From number should be included on the
harmonizing the solicited transactions Members, Participants, or Others subject line if email is used. To help the
rules and making trading through The Exchange neither solicited nor Commission process and review your
compression forums subject to the rules received written comments on the comments more efficiently, please use
set forth in Rule 6.9. Accordingly, the proposed rule change. only one method. The Commission will
Exchange believes that the proposed post all comments on the Commission’s
rule changes to Rule 6.56 would III. Date of Effectiveness of the Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
eliminate potential confusion caused by
Commission Action submission, all subsequent
regulatory discrepancies in the Rules
Because the foregoing proposed rule amendments, all written statements
and provide additional clarity,
change does not: with respect to the proposed rule
specifically with respect to the
A. Significantly affect the protection change that are filed with the
application of the solicited transaction Commission, and all written
rules. The Exchange believes that the of investors or the public interest;
B. impose any significant burden on communications relating to the
adoption of clear, transparent, and proposed rule change between the
consistent rules is in the best interests competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from Commission and any person, other than
of both investors and the general public. those that may be withheld from the
the date on which it was filed, or such
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s shorter time as the Commission may public in accordance with the
Statement on Burden on Competition designate, it has become effective provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the available for Web site viewing and
The Exchange does not believe that Act 20 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 21 printing in the Commission’s Public
the proposed rule change will impose thereunder. At any time within 60 days Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
any burden on intramarket competition of the filing of the proposed rule change, Washington, DC 20549, on official
that is not necessary or appropriate in the Commission summarily may business days between the hours of
furtherance of the Act because it applies temporarily suspend such rule change if 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
to all market participants with positions it appears to the Commission that such filing also will be available for
that meet the eligible criteria in the action is necessary or appropriate in the inspection and copying at the principal
same manner. The proposed change public interest, for the protection of office of the Exchange. All comments
would encourage the closing of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of received will be posted without change;
positions, which, once closed, may the purposes of the Act. If the the Commission does not edit personal
Commission takes such action, the identifying information from
serve to alleviate the capital
Commission will institute proceedings submissions. You should submit only
requirement constraints on TPHs and
to determine whether the proposed rule information that you wish to make
improve overall market liquidity by
change should be approved or available publicly. All submissions
freeing capital currently tied up in should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
certain SPX positions. The Exchange disapproved.
2017–035, and should be submitted on
does not believe that the proposed rule IV. Solicitation of Comments or before May 31, 2017.
changes will impose any burden on Interested persons are invited to For the Commission, by the Division of
intermarket competition that is not submit written data, views, and Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
necessary or appropriate in furtherance arguments concerning the foregoing, authority.22
of the purposes of the Act because the including whether the proposed rule Eduardo A. Aleman,
proposed rule change applies only to change is consistent with the Act. Assistant Secretary.
the trading of SPX options, which are Comments may be submitted by any of [FR Doc. 2017–09424 Filed 5–9–17; 8:45 am]
exclusively-listed on CBOE. To the the following methods: BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
extent that the proposed changes make
Electronic Comments
the Exchange a more attractive
marketplace for market participants at • Use the Commission’s Internet
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
other exchanges, such market comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
participants are eligible to participant rules/sro.shtml); or Federal Aviation Administration
through CBOE TPHs. Furthermore, as • Send an email to rule-comments@
stated in Item 3(b) above, submission of sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To
lists of positions for compression is CBOE–2017–035 on the subject line. Release Airport Property at Walnut
completely voluntary, open to all TPHs, Paper Comments Ridge Regional Airport, Walnut Ridge,
and non-binding, in that submission of Arkansas
• Send paper comments in triplicate
a list does not require a TPH to trade to Secretary, Securities and Exchange AGENCY: Federal Aviation
any position or even represent any Commission, 100 F Street NE., Administration (FAA), DOT.
position through a compression forum. Washington, DC 20549–1090. ACTION: Notice of request to release
Lists of positions will be made available airport property.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
to all TPHs simply alert TPHs to certain 20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
SPX positions that other TPHs are 21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and
interested in closing at the end of each 4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give invites public comment on the release of
calendar month.
the Commission written notice of its intent to file land at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport
the proposed rule change at least five business days under the provisions of Section 125 of
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the the Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement. 22 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:21 May 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_21955/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2017-05-10 00:01:10
Document Modified: 2017-05-10 00:01:10
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 21866 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR