82 FR 21956 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 90 (May 11, 2017)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 90 (May 11, 2017)
| Page Range | 21956-21958 | |
| FR Document | 2017-09378 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 90 (Thursday, May 11, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 21956-21958] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-09378] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2017-0419; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-077-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus Helicopters (Airbus) Model AS332L2 and EC225LP helicopters. This proposed AD would require inspections of the main rotor (M/R) blade attachment pins (attachment pins). This proposed AD is prompted by a report of three cracked attachment pins. The proposed actions are intended to detect and prevent an unsafe condition on these products. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 10, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017- 0419; or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, the economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at http://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. You may review the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Hatfield, Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5116; email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [[Page 21957]] Comments Invited We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive. Discussion EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2015-0016, dated January 30, 2015, to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Model AS 332 L2 and EC 225 LP helicopters with certain part-numbered attachment pins installed. EASA advises of three cracked attachment pins on a Model AS 332 L2 helicopter. According to EASA, the cracks resulted from a combination of factors including corrosion that had initiated in the inner diameter area of the attachment pin chamfer. EASA states that if this condition is not detected and corrected, it may lead to failure of the attachment pin with loss of control of the helicopter. Due to design similarity, Model EC225LP helicopters are also affected by this issue. For these reasons, EASA AD No. 2015-0016 requires repetitive inspections of the attachment pins for corrosion. FAA's Determination These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other products of these same type designs. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332-05.00.99, Revision 0, dated December 22, 2014 (AS332-05.00.99), for Model AS332L2 helicopters and Airbus Helicopters ASB No. EC225- 05A040, Revision 0, dated December 22, 2014 (EC225-05A040), for Model EC225LP helicopters. Airbus Helicopters advises of cracks discovered in attachment pins that resulted from a combination of factors, but mainly corrosion which initiated in the inner diameter at the chamfer. This service information specifies repetitively inspecting for corrosion and cracks and ensuring there are no corrosion pits in the attachment pins. If there is corrosion, this service information allows an attachment pin to be reworked up to four times before removing it from service. If there is a crack, this service information specifies contacting and sending the attachment pin to Airbus Helicopters. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Proposed AD Requirements This proposed AD would require an initial and recurring inspection of each attachment pin for corrosion, a crack, and any pitting. If there is a crack or any pitting, this proposed AD would require replacing the attachment pin. If there is corrosion, this proposed AD would require removing the corrosion up to a maximum of four times. This proposed AD would also require performing these inspections prior to installing an attachment pin. Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD The EASA AD does not require an inspection of the protective coating of each attachment pin for Model EC225LP helicopters. This proposed AD would require inspecting the protective coating of each attachment pin for both model helicopters. The EASA AD requires ensuring there are no corrosion pits without a corresponding corrective action. This proposed AD would require replacing an attachment pin that has any pitting. The EASA AD requires a non-destructive inspection if in doubt about whether there is a crack, while this proposed AD would not. Lastly, the EASA AD requires contacting and returning to Airbus Helicopters any attachment pin with a crack, and this proposed AD would not. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 5 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this proposed AD. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per work-hour. For Model AS332L2 helicopters, there would be no costs of compliance with this proposed AD because there are no helicopters with this type certificate on the U.S. Registry. For Model EC225LP helicopters, which have ten attachment pins installed, inspecting the attachment pins would take about 1 work-hour for a total cost of $85 per helicopter and $425 for the U.S. fleet. Removing corrosion would take about 1 work-hour for a total cost of $85 per attachment pin. Replacing an attachment pin would take negligible additional labor time and required parts would cost about $5,720. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation: [[Page 21958]] 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2017-0419; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-077-AD. (a) Applicability This AD applies to the following helicopters, certificated in any category: (1) Model AS332L2 helicopters with a main rotor (M/R) blade attachment pin (attachment pin) part number (P/N) 332A31-2123-00 or P/N 332A31-2115-20 installed; and (2) Model EC225LP helicopters with an attachment pin P/N 332A31- 3204-20 installed. (b) Unsafe Condition This AD defines the unsafe condition as corrosion or a crack in an attachment pin. This condition could result in loss of an M/R blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. (c) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by July 10, 2017. (d) Compliance You are responsible for performing each action required by this AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been accomplished prior to that time. (e) Required Actions (1) For Model AS332L2 helicopters, within 410 hours time-in- service (TIS), and for Model EC225LP helicopters within 660 hours TIS, remove each attachment pin and inspect the protective coating on the inside of the attachment pin for scratches and missing protective coating. (i) If there is a scratch or any missing protective coating, sand the attachment pin to remove the varnish in the area depicted as ``Area A'' in Figure 1 of Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332-05.00.99, Revision 0, dated December 22, 2014 (AS332-05.00.99), or Airbus Helicopters ASB No. EC225-05A040, Revision 0, dated December 22, 2014 (EC225-05A040), as applicable to your model helicopter. (ii) Using a 10X or higher power magnifying glass, inspect for corrosion and pitting at the chamfer. An example of pitting is shown in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.B.3., Note 1, of AS332-05.00.99, and paragraph 3.B.2., Note 1, of EC225-05A040. If there is any corrosion, remove the corrosion. If there is any pitting, replace the attachment pin. Do not sand the attachment pin to remove a corrosion pit. (iii) Using a 10X or higher power magnifying glass, inspect the inside and outside of the attachment pin for a crack in the areas depicted as ``Area A'' and ``Area B'' in Figure 1 of AS332-05.00.99 or EC225-05A040, as applicable to your model helicopter. Pay particular attention to the chamfer in ``Area A.'' If there is a crack, remove the attachment pin from service. (2) Thereafter, for Model AS332L2 helicopters, at intervals not to exceed 825 hours TIS or 26 months, whichever occurs first; and for Model EC225LP helicopters, at intervals not to exceed 1,320 hours TIS or 26 months, whichever occurs first; perform the actions specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD. Corrosion may be removed from an attachment pin as specified in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this AD a maximum of four times. If there is a fifth occurrence of corrosion on an attachment pin, before further flight, remove the attachment pin from service. (3) Do not install an attachment pin P/N 332A31-2123-00, P/N 332A31-2115-20, or P/N 332A31-3204-20 on any helicopter unless you have complied with the actions in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD. (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: David Hatfield, Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222- 5116; email [email protected]. (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC. (g) Additional Information The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2015-0016, dated January 30, 2015. You may view the EASA AD on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket. (h) Subject Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6200, Main Rotor System. Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 27, 2017. Scott A. Horn, Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2017-09378 Filed 5-10-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![21956 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 90 / Thursday, May 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
other than the rule itself may affect above). In particular, the Bureau invites Helicopters (Airbus) Model AS332L2
observable outcomes. the public, including consumers and and EC225LP helicopters. This
The Bureau has data sources, their advocates, housing counselors, proposed AD would require inspections
currently available or in development, mortgage loan servicers and other of the main rotor (M/R) blade
with which to undertake these analyses, industry representatives, industry attachment pins (attachment pins). This
and the Bureau is also planning to analysts, and other interested persons to proposed AD is prompted by a report of
secure additional data. These data submit the following: three cracked attachment pins. The
sources include the National Mortgage (1) Comments on the feasibility and proposed actions are intended to detect
Database (NMDB) and the American effectiveness of the assessment plan, the and prevent an unsafe condition on
Survey of Mortgage Borrowers objectives of the 2013 RESPA Servicing these products.
(ASMB),24 data from consumer Rule that the Bureau intends to DATES: We must receive comments on
complaints submitted to the Bureau, emphasize in the assessment, and the this proposed AD by July 10, 2017.
servicing data from a private vendor, outcomes, metrics, baselines, and ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
and applicable information obtained analytical methods for assessing the any of the following methods:
from Bureau supervision and effectiveness of the rule as described in • Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
enforcement activities. The Bureau is part IV above; http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
also exploring the availability and (2) Data and other factual information online instructions for sending your
utility of other sources of administrative that may be useful for executing the comments electronically.
data for conducting the assessment. Bureau’s assessment plan, as described • Fax: 202–493–2251.
The Bureau intends to seek input in part IV above; • Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
from housing counselors, legal aid (3) Recommendations to improve the Department of Transportation, Docket
attorneys, and mortgage servicers as it assessment plan, as well as data, other Operations, M–30, West Building
analyzes the data described above and factual information, and sources of data Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
interprets the findings. The Bureau is that would be useful and available to New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
also seeking to obtain deidentified loan- execute any recommended DC 20590–0001.
level data from a small number of improvements to the assessment plan; • Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
servicers. This would potentially allow (4) Data and other factual information ‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
the Bureau to correlate mandated about the benefits and costs of the rule p.m., Monday through Friday, except
servicer activity (e.g., the early for consumers, servicers, and others in Federal holidays.
intervention requirements of the 2013 the mortgage industry; and about the
RESPA Servicing Rule) with consumer effects of the rule on transparency, Examining the AD Docket
activity (e.g., additional consumer efficiency, access, and innovation in the You may examine the AD docket on
payments or additional loss mitigation mortgage market; the Internet at http://
applications occurring shortly after (5) Data and other factual information www.regulations.gov by searching for
early intervention communications). It about the rule’s effectiveness in meeting and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
would also potentially allow the Bureau the purposes and objectives of title X of 0419; or in person at the Docket
to correlate consumer and servicer the Dodd-Frank Act (section 1021), Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
activity with the measures of immediate which are listed in part IV above; and p.m., Monday through Friday, except
consumer outcomes discussed earlier (6) Recommendations for modifying, Federal holidays. The AD docket
(fees and charges, delinquency expanding or eliminating the 2013 contains this proposed AD, the
resolution, time to resolution). RESPA Servicing Rule. European Aviation Safety Agency
V. Request for Comment Dated: April 29, 2017. (EASA) AD, the economic evaluation,
Richard Cordray, any comments received, and other
To inform the assessment, the Bureau information. The street address for the
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
hereby invites members of the public to Docket Operations Office (telephone
Protection.
submit information and other comments 800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
[FR Doc. 2017–09361 Filed 5–10–17; 8:45 am]
relevant to the issues identified below, section. Comments will be available in
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
as well as any information relevant to the AD docket shortly after receipt.
assessing the effectiveness of the 2013 For service information identified in
RESPA Servicing Rule in meeting the this proposed rule, contact Airbus
purposes and objectives of title X of the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Dodd-Frank Act (section 1021) and the Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
specific goals of the Bureau (enumerated Federal Aviation Administration
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax
14 CFR Part 39 (972) 641–3775; or at http://
24 The NMDB and the ASMB are multi-year
www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub.
projects being jointly undertaken by the Federal [Docket No. FAA–2017–0419; Directorate
Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and the Bureau. You may review the referenced service
Identifier 2015–SW–077–AD] information at the FAA, Office of the
See Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, National Mortgage
Database, http://www.fhfa.gov/PolicyPrograms RIN 2120–AA64 Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
Research/Programs/Pages/National-Mortgage- 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N–321,
Database.aspx (last visited Mar. 22, 2017); Fed.
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Fort Worth, TX 76177.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
Hous. Fin. Agency, American Survey of Mortgage
Borrowers, http://www.fhfa.gov/PolicyPrograms Helicopters FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Research/Programs/Pages/American-Survey-of- David Hatfield, Aviation Safety
Mortgage-Borrowers.aspx (last visited Mar. 22, AGENCY: Federal Aviation
2017); Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot., Technical Administration (FAA), DOT. Engineer, Safety Management Group,
Reports: National Survey of Mortgage Originations Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and National Mortgage Database, http:// Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177;
www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research- (NPRM).
telephone (817) 222–5116; email
reports/technical-reports-national-survey-of-
mortgage-borrowers-and-national-mortgage- SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new david.hatfield@faa.gov.
database/(last visited Mar. 22, 2017). airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 May 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM 11MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_22046/page/1.svg)
![21958 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 90 / Thursday, May 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (e) Required Actions (g) Additional Information
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (1) For Model AS332L2 helicopters, within The subject of this AD is addressed in
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 410 hours time-in-service (TIS), and for European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures Model EC225LP helicopters within 660 hours No. 2015–0016, dated January 30, 2015. You
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); TIS, remove each attachment pin and inspect may view the EASA AD on the Internet at
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in the protective coating on the inside of the http://www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket.
attachment pin for scratches and missing
Alaska to the extent that it justifies protective coating. (h) Subject
making a regulatory distinction; and (i) If there is a scratch or any missing Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
4. Will not have a significant protective coating, sand the attachment pin Code: 6200, Main Rotor System.
economic impact, positive or negative, to remove the varnish in the area depicted as
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 27,
on a substantial number of small entities ‘‘Area A’’ in Figure 1 of Airbus Helicopters
2017.
under the criteria of the Regulatory Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332–
05.00.99, Revision 0, dated December 22, Scott A. Horn,
Flexibility Act.
2014 (AS332–05.00.99), or Airbus Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
We prepared an economic evaluation
Helicopters ASB No. EC225–05A040, Aircraft Certification Service.
of the estimated costs to comply with Revision 0, dated December 22, 2014
this proposed AD and placed it in the [FR Doc. 2017–09378 Filed 5–10–17; 8:45 am]
(EC225–05A040), as applicable to your model
AD docket. helicopter. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(ii) Using a 10X or higher power
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 magnifying glass, inspect for corrosion and
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation pitting at the chamfer. An example of pitting DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
safety, Incorporation by reference, is shown in the Accomplishment SECURITY
Safety. Instructions, paragraph 3.B.3., Note 1, of
AS332–05.00.99, and paragraph 3.B.2., Note Coast Guard
The Proposed Amendment 1, of EC225–05A040. If there is any
corrosion, remove the corrosion. If there is
Accordingly, under the authority any pitting, replace the attachment pin. Do 33 CFR Part 165
delegated to me by the Administrator, not sand the attachment pin to remove a
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0331]
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part corrosion pit.
39 as follows: (iii) Using a 10X or higher power RIN 1625–AA00
magnifying glass, inspect the inside and
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS outside of the attachment pin for a crack in Safety Zone; Thunder on the Outer
DIRECTIVES the areas depicted as ‘‘Area A’’ and ‘‘Area B’’
Harbor; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo,
in Figure 1 of AS332–05.00.99 or EC225–
05A040, as applicable to your model NY
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
helicopter. Pay particular attention to the AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
continues to read as follows:
chamfer in ‘‘Area A.’’ If there is a crack,
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. remove the attachment pin from service. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
(2) Thereafter, for Model AS332L2
§ 39.13 [Amended] helicopters, at intervals not to exceed 825 SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding hours TIS or 26 months, whichever occurs establish a temporary safety zone for
the following new airworthiness first; and for Model EC225LP helicopters, at certain waters of the Buffalo Outer
directive (AD): intervals not to exceed 1,320 hours TIS or 26 Harbor during the Thunder on the Outer
months, whichever occurs first; perform the Harbor boat races. This proposed
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2017– actions specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this
0419; Directorate Identifier 2015–SW–077–
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
AD. Corrosion may be removed from an
AD. attachment pin as specified in paragraph vessels from being in the safety zone
(e)(1)(ii) of this AD a maximum of four times. unless authorized by the Captain of the
(a) Applicability Port Buffalo or a designated
If there is a fifth occurrence of corrosion on
This AD applies to the following an attachment pin, before further flight, representative. We invite your
helicopters, certificated in any category: remove the attachment pin from service. comments on this proposed rulemaking.
(1) Model AS332L2 helicopters with a (3) Do not install an attachment pin P/N
DATES: Comments and related material
main rotor (M/R) blade attachment pin 332A31–2123–00, P/N 332A31–2115–20, or
(attachment pin) part number (P/N) 332A31– P/N 332A31–3204–20 on any helicopter must be received by the Coast Guard on
2123–00 or P/N 332A31–2115–20 installed; unless you have complied with the actions in or before June 16, 2017.
and paragraph (e)(1) of this AD. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
(2) Model EC225LP helicopters with an identified by docket number USCG–
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
attachment pin P/N 332A31–3204–20 2017–0331 using the Federal
(AMOCs)
installed. eRulemaking Portal at http://
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
(b) Unsafe Condition Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
This AD defines the unsafe condition as AD. Send your proposal to: David Hatfield, Participation and Request for
corrosion or a crack in an attachment pin. Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Comments’’ portion of the
This condition could result in loss of an M/ Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
R blade and subsequent loss of control of the Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; further instructions on submitting
helicopter. telephone (817) 222–5116; email 9-ASW- comments.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(c) Comments Due Date (2) For operations conducted under a 14 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
We must receive comments by July 10, CFR part 119 operating certificate or under you have questions about this proposed
2017. 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that rulemaking, call or email LT Michael
you notify your principal inspector, or Collet, Chief of Waterways Management,
(d) Compliance lacking a principal inspector, the manager of U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo;
You are responsible for performing each the local flight standards district office or
action required by this AD within the certificate holding district office before
telephone 716–843–9343, email
specified compliance time unless it has operating any aircraft complying with this SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil.
already been accomplished prior to that time. AD through an AMOC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 May 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM 11MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_22046/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-05-11 00:14:52
Document Modified: 2017-05-11 00:14:52
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). | |
| Dates | We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 10, 2017. | |
| Contact | David Hatfield, Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5116; email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 21956 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR