82 FR 23148 - Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators Rule; Delay of Effective Date

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 97 (May 22, 2017)

On January 4, 2017, EPA published a final rule revising the regulation concerning the certification of applicators of restricted use pesticides (RUPs). The original effective date of March 6, 2017 was extended to March 21, 2017 by rule issued January 26, 2017, and subsequently extended to May 22, 2017 by rule issued March 20, 2017. In accordance with the Presidential directives as expressed in the memorandum of January 20, 2017, from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled ``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review,'' and the principles identified in the April 25, 2017 Executive Order ``Promoting Agriculture and Rural Prosperity in America,'' EPA solicited public comments on May 15, 2017 about a possible further delay of the effective date of the January 4, 2017 revisions to the Certification of Pesticide Applicators rule until May 22, 2018. With this action, EPA is making an interim extension of the effective date until June 5, 2017 in order to consider and respond to public comments received in regard to the proposed May 22, 2018 extension.

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 97 (Monday, May 22, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23148-23150]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 171

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0183; FRL-9962-94]


Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators Rule; Delay of 
Effective Date

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 4, 2017, EPA published a final rule revising the 
regulation concerning the certification of applicators of restricted 
use pesticides (RUPs). The original effective date of March 6, 2017 was 
extended to March 21, 2017 by rule issued January 26, 2017, and 
subsequently extended to May 22, 2017 by rule issued March 20, 2017. In 
accordance with the Presidential directives as expressed in the 
memorandum of January 20, 2017, from the Assistant to the President and 
Chief of Staff, entitled ``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review,'' and the 
principles identified in the April 25, 2017 Executive Order ``Promoting 
Agriculture and Rural Prosperity in America,'' EPA solicited public 
comments on May 15, 2017 about a possible further delay of the 
effective date of the January 4, 2017 revisions to the Certification of 
Pesticide Applicators rule until May 22, 2018. With this action, EPA is 
making an interim extension of the effective date until June 5, 2017 in 
order to consider and respond to public comments received in regard to 
the proposed May 22, 2018 extension.

DATES: The effective date of the final rule that appeared in the 
Federal Register of January 4, 2017 (82 FR 952), is delayed from May 
22, 2017, to June 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0183, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket)

[[Page 23149]]

in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West 
William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the 
telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review 
the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket 
available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Keaney, Field and External 
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; 
telephone number: (703) 305-5557; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

    On January 26, 2017, EPA published a final rule in the Federal 
Register entitled ``Delay of Effective Date for 30 Final Regulations 
Published by the Environmental Protection Agency Between October 28, 
2016 and January 17, 2017'' (82 FR 8499). In that rule, EPA delayed the 
effective dates of the thirty regulations, including the final rule 
revising the regulation concerning the certification of applicators of 
restricted use pesticides (RUPs) issued on January 4, 2017 (82 FR 952) 
(FR-9956-70), as requested in the memorandum of January 20, 2017, from 
the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled 
``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review'' (January 20 Memorandum). The 
January 20 Memorandum directed the heads of Executive Departments and 
Agencies to postpone for 60 days from the date of the January 20 
Memorandum the effective dates of all regulations that had been 
published in the Federal Register but had not yet taken effect.
    The January 20 Memorandum further directed that where appropriate 
and as permitted by applicable law, agencies should consider a rule to 
delay the effective date for regulations beyond that 60-day period. 
Accordingly, on March 20, 2017, EPA published the final rule ``Further 
Delay of Effective Dates for Five Final Regulations Published by the 
Environmental Protection Agency Between December 12, 2016 and January 
17, 2017'' (82 FR 14324), which applied to the revised Certification of 
Pesticide Applicators rule and four other rules. Pursuant to that March 
20, 2017 rule, the effective date of the revised Certification of 
Pesticide Applicators rule was extended to May 22, 2017. To give 
recently arrived Agency officials the opportunity to conduct a 
substantive review of the revised Certification of Pesticide 
Applicators rule, EPA solicited public comment on a proposed further 
delay of the effective date until May 22, 2018 (82 FR 22294, May 15, 
2017). EPA anticipates receiving comments in response to the May 15, 
2017 request for comments on the proposal to further delay until May 
22, 2018 the effective date of the January 4, 2017 final rule, and 
therefore is extending the effective date of that final rule until June 
5, 2017 in order to allow adequate time to consider and respond to the 
public comments.
    Section 553(b)(1)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(1)(B), allows an action to be taken without opportunity for 
notice or comment when the agency for good cause finds that notice and 
public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to 
the public interest. In addition, section 553(d)(3), 5 U.S.C. 
553(d)(3), allows the effective date of an action to be less than 30 
days when a good cause finding is made. Because of the immediate 
pendency of the effective date of the January 4, 2017 final rule, it 
would be impractical to make the effective date of this extension 30 
days after its publication, and it would be impractical to get public 
comments on this interim extension of the effective date of the rule. 
In addition, EPA still has only one Senate-confirmed official, and the 
new Administration has not had the time to adequately review the 
January 4, 2017 certification rule. This extension to June 5, 2017, 
will prevent the confusion and disruption among regulatees and 
stakeholders that would result if the January 4, 2017 rule were to 
become effective (displace the existing regulation) and then stayed or 
revoked as a result of administrative review. Therefore, EPA finds good 
cause to extend the effective date of the rule without notice and 
comment.

II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review; and, 
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) 
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not involve any information collection activities 
subject to the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under RFA, 5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or 
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have Tribal implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it is not an economically significant 
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not 
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution 
or use of energy.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration under NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272 
note.

[[Page 23150]]

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    EPA believes that this action would not have disproportionately 
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, 
low-income, or indigenous populations, as specified in Executive Order 
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 171

    Environmental protection, Applicator competency, Agricultural 
worker safety, Certified applicator, Pesticide safety training, 
Pesticide worker safety, Pesticides and pests, Restricted use 
pesticides.

    Dated: May 17, 2017.
Louise P. Wise,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017-10541 Filed 5-18-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P