82 FR 23188 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 97 (May 22, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 97 (May 22, 2017)
| Page Range | 23188-23190 | |
| FR Document | 2017-10505 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 97 (Monday, May 22, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 23188-23190] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-10505] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-489-830] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to exporters and producers of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. For information on the estimated subsidy rates, see the ``Final Determination'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective May 22, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3857. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 1, 2017, the Department published its affirmative Preliminary Determination of this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation.\1\ The petitioner in this investigation is the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members.\2\ The mandatory respondent in this investigation is Haba[scedil] Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal End[uuml]strisi A.[Scedil]. (Habas),\3\ including certain cross-owned companies and subcontractors.\4\ Both Habas and the Government of Turkey (the GOT) participated in this investigation. A complete summary of the events that occurred since publication of the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.\5\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B-8024 of the Department's main building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 82 FR 12195 (March 1, 2017) (Preliminary Determination). \2\ The Rebar Trade Action Coalition is comprised of Byer Steel Group, Inc., Commercial Metals Company, Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Nucor Corporation, and Steel Dynamics, Inc. \3\ Habas is the sole Turkish rebar producer/exporter excluded from the existing CVD order on rebar from Turkey. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 65926 (November 6, 2014) (2014 Turkey CVD Order). \4\ The Habas companies include Habas, Haba[scedil] Elektrik [Uuml]retim A.[Scedil]., Haba[scedil] End[uuml]stri Tesisleri A.[Scedil]., Haba[scedil] Petrol A.[Scedil]., Merta[scedil] Turizm Nakliyat ve Ticaret A.[Scedil]., Cebita[scedil] Demir [Ccedil]elik End[uuml]strisi A.[Scedil]., Ege [Ccedil]elik End[uuml]strisi Sanayi ve Ticaret A.[Scedil]., and Osman S[ouml]nmez (In[scedil]aat Taahh[uuml]t Ticaret). \5\ See Department Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey,'' May 15, 2017 (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The scope of the investigation covers rebar from Turkey. The Department did not receive any scope comments and has not updated the scope of the investigation since the Preliminary Determination. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I to this notice. Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received The subsidy programs under investigation, as well as the issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal briefs submitted by interested parties in this proceeding, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties and responded to by the Department in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached at Appendix II to this notice. Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), during February and March 2017, the Department verified the subsidy information reported by the GOT and Habas. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting records and original source documents provided by the respondents. Use of Adverse Facts Available In making this final determination, the Department relied, in part, on facts available. As discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,\6\ we determine that Habas withheld necessary information with respect to certain import duty rebates/drawbacks received during the POI and, accordingly, did not act to the best of its ability in responding to the Department's request for information. Therefore, we drew an adverse inference, where appropriate, in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\7\ For further information, see the ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5-8. \7\ See Sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the subsidy rate calculations since the Preliminary Determination. These changes are discussed in the ``Analysis of Programs'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 8; see also Department Memorandum, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Calculations for the Final Countervailing Duty Determination,'' May 15, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 23189]] All-Others Rate In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, the Department calculated a countervailable subsidy rate for the individually investigated exporter/producer of the subject merchandise. Consistent with sections 705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) and 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the Department also calculated an estimated ``all-others'' rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated.\9\ Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act provides that the ``all-others'' rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted-average of the countervailable subsidy rates established for individually investigated exporters and producers, excluding any rates that are zero or de minimis or any rates determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. Because the weighted- average countervailable subsidy rate calculated for Habas is not zero or de minimis or based entirely on facts available under section 776 of the Act, the rate calculated for Habas is the rate assigned to all other producers and exporters, pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ The scope of this countervailing duty investigation only covers rebar produced and/or exported by companies excluded from the existing 2014 Turkey CVD Order. Currently, only merchandise produced and exported by Habas is excluded from the existing order. Therefore, at this time, no companies will be subject to the all- others rate indicated above, and cash deposits discussed below will apply solely to rebar produced and/or exported by Habas. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination The Department determines the total estimated countervailable subsidy rates to be: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ This rate applies only to merchandise both produced and exported by Haba[scedil] Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal End[uuml]strisi A.[Scedil]. Merchandise produced by Habas, but exported by another company, or produced by another company and exported by Habas continues to be covered by the 2014 Turkey CVD Order. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Haba[scedil] Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal 16.21 End[uuml]strisi A.[Scedil].\10\........................ All-Others.............................................. 16.21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b), we will disclose the calculations performed within five days of any public announcement of this notice. Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 703(d) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of rebar from Turkey, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 1, 2017, the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination. Furthermore, the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative determination of countervailable subsidies. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of rebar from Turkey no later than 45 days after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue a CVD order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, countervailing duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the ``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 705(d) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: May 15, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise subject to this investigation is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack thereof. Subject merchandise includes deformed steel wire with bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and which has been subjected to an elongation test. The subject merchandise includes rebar that has been further processed in the subject country or a third country, including but not limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the rebar. Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or smooth rebar). Also excluded from the scope is deformed steel wire meeting ASTM A1064/A1064M with no bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and without being subject to an elongation test. At the time of the filing of the petition, there was an existing countervailing duty order on steel reinforcing bar from the Republic of Turkey. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey, 79 FR 65,926 (Dep't Commerce Nov. 6, 2014) (2014 Turkey CVD Order). The scope of this countervailing duty investigation with regard to rebar from Turkey covers only rebar produced and/or exported by those companies that are excluded from the 2014 Turkey CVD Order. At the time of the issuance of the 2014 Turkey CVD Order, Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. was the only excluded Turkish rebar producer or exporter. The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope remains dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Scope Comments V. Subsidies Valuation VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences [[Page 23190]] VII. Analysis of Programs VIII. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Financial Contribution in AD/CVD Investigation Assistance Program Comment 2: Sales Denominator for Habas Comment 3: Rejection of Habas's February 2, 2017 Rebuttal Benchmark Submission Comment 4: Natural Gas Benchmark Comment 5: Application of Adverse Facts Available for Discovered Program Comment 6: Countervailability of Electricity for More Than Adequate Remuneration IX. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017-10505 Filed 5-19-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![23188 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 97 / Monday, May 22, 2017 / Notices
Administrative Protective Orders duty (CVD) investigation.1 The description of the scope of this
This notice also serves as a reminder petitioner in this investigation is the investigation, see Appendix I to this
to parties subject to administrative Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its notice.
protective order (APO) of their individual members.2 The mandatory
respondent in this investigation is Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
responsibility concerning the return or Comments Received
destruction of proprietary information Habaş Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal
disclosed under APO in accordance Endüstrisi A.Ş. (Habas),3 including The subsidy programs under
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which certain cross-owned companies and
investigation, as well as the issues
continues to govern business subcontractors.4 Both Habas and the
raised in the case briefs and rebuttal
proprietary information in this segment Government of Turkey (the GOT)
briefs submitted by interested parties in
of the proceeding. Timely written participated in this investigation. A
this proceeding, are discussed in the
notification of the return or destruction complete summary of the events that
occurred since publication of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
of APO materials, or conversion to list of the issues raised by parties and
judicial protective order, is hereby Preliminary Determination, as well as a
full discussion of the issues raised by responded to by the Department in the
requested. Failure to comply with the Issues and Decision Memorandum is
parties for this final determination, may
regulations and terms of an APO is a attached at Appendix II to this notice.
be found in the Issues and Decision
violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these Memorandum, which is dated Verification
final results of administrative review in concurrently with and hereby adopted
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and by this notice.5 The Issues and Decision As provided in section 782(i) of the
777(i) of the Act. Memorandum is a public document and Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
is available electronically via during February and March 2017, the
Dated: May 16, 2017. Enforcement and Compliance’s Department verified the subsidy
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty information reported by the GOT and
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Centralized Electronic Service System Habas. We used standard verification
and Compliance. (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to procedures, including an examination of
[FR Doc. 2017–10351 Filed 5–19–17; 8:45 am] registered users at http:// relevant accounting records and original
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P access.trade.gov and to all parties in the source documents provided by the
Central Records Unit, room B–8024 of respondents.
the Department’s main building. In
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE addition, a complete version of the Use of Adverse Facts Available
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
International Trade Administration be accessed at http:// In making this final determination,
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed the Department relied, in part, on facts
[C–489–830]
Issues and Decision Memorandum and available. As discussed in the Issues and
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the electronic version are identical in Decision Memorandum,6 we determine
the Republic of Turkey: Final content. that Habas withheld necessary
Affirmative Countervailing Duty information with respect to certain
Scope of the Investigation import duty rebates/drawbacks received
Determination
The scope of the investigation covers during the POI and, accordingly, did not
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, rebar from Turkey. The Department did act to the best of its ability in
International Trade Administration, not receive any scope comments and responding to the Department’s request
Department of Commerce. has not updated the scope of the for information. Therefore, we drew an
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce investigation since the Preliminary adverse inference, where appropriate, in
(the Department) determines that Determination. For a complete selecting from among the facts
countervailable subsidies are being
otherwise available.7 For further
provided to exporters and producers of 1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the
steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) information, see the ‘‘Use of Facts
Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative
from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey). Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment Otherwise Available and Adverse
The period of investigation (POI) is of Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Inferences’’ in the accompanying Issues
Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 82 FR and Decision Memorandum.
January 1, 2015, through December 31, 12195 (March 1, 2017) (Preliminary Determination).
2015. For information on the estimated 2 The Rebar Trade Action Coalition is comprised
Changes Since the Preliminary
subsidy rates, see the ‘‘Final of Byer Steel Group, Inc., Commercial Metals Determination
Determination’’ section of this notice. Company, Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Nucor
Corporation, and Steel Dynamics, Inc.
DATES: Effective May 22, 2017. 3 Habas is the sole Turkish rebar producer/
Based on our analysis of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: exporter excluded from the existing CVD order on comments received and our findings at
Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, rebar from Turkey. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing verification, we made certain changes to
Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing the subsidy rate calculations since the
Office VII, Enforcement and Duty Order, 79 FR 65926 (November 6, 2014) (2014
Compliance, International Trade Turkey CVD Order). Preliminary Determination. These
Administration, U.S. Department of 4 The Habas companies include Habas, Habaş changes are discussed in the ‘‘Analysis
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Elektrik Üretim A.Ş., Habaş Endüstri Tesisleri A.Ş., of Programs’’ section of the Issues and
Habaş Petrol A.Ş., Mertaş Turizm Nakliyat ve Decision Memorandum.8
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Ticaret A.Ş., Cebitaş Demir Çelik Endüstrisi A.Ş.,
(202) 482–3857. Ege Çelik Endüstrisi Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., and
6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5–8.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Osman Sönmez (Inşaat Taahhüt Ticaret).
5 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and 7 See Sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
Background Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative 8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 8; see
Determination in the Countervailing Duty also Department Memorandum, ‘‘Steel Concrete
On March 1, 2017, the Department Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey:
published its affirmative Preliminary the Republic of Turkey,’’ May 15, 2017 (Issues and Calculations for the Final Countervailing Duty
Determination of this countervailing Decision Memorandum). Determination,’’ May 15, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:17 May 19, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_23285/page/1.svg)
![23190 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 97 / Monday, May 22, 2017 / Notices
VII. Analysis of Programs antidumping duty administrative review document and is on file electronically
VIII. Discussion of the Issues of wire rod from Mexico.1 We invited via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Comment 1: Financial Contribution in AD/ interested parties to comment on our Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
CVD Investigation Assistance Program Preliminary Results. On January 11, Centralized Electronic Service System
Comment 2: Sales Denominator for Habas
Comment 3: Rejection of Habas’s February
2017, the Department received case (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
2, 2017 Rebuttal Benchmark Submission briefs from Deacero, and Nucor registered users at http://
Comment 4: Natural Gas Benchmark Corporation (Nucor).2 On January 17, access.trade.gov and in the Central
Comment 5: Application of Adverse Facts 2017, interested parties submitted Records Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the
Available for Discovered Program rebuttal briefs. On January 20, 2017, the main Department of Commerce
Comment 6: Countervailability of Department extended the deadline for building. In addition, a complete
Electricity for More Than Adequate the final results of this administrative version of the Issues and Decision
Remuneration review until May 15, 2017.3 On January Memorandum can be accessed directly
IX. Conclusion 31, 2017, the Department held a public on the Internet at http://trade.gov/
[FR Doc. 2017–10505 Filed 5–19–17; 8:45 am] hearing. The Department conducted this enforcement. The signed Issues and
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P administrative review in accordance Decision Memorandum and the
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of electronic versions of the Issues and
1930, as amended (the Act). Decision Memorandum are identical in
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE content.
Period of Review
International Trade Administration The POR covered by this review is Changes Since the Preliminary Results
[A–201–830] October 1, 2014, through September 30, Based on our analysis of the
2015. comments received, we applied total
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire adverse facts available (AFA) to Deacero
Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Scope of the Order
and assigned it the highest margin
Antidumping Duty Administrative The merchandise subject to this order alleged in the petition, i.e., 40.52
Review and Final Determination of No is carbon and certain alloy steel wire percent, as Deacero’s AFA rate. These
Shipments; 2014–2015 rod. The product is currently classified changes are fully discussed in the Issues
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule and Decision Memorandum.
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, of the United States (HTSUS) item
International Trade Administration, numbers 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3090, Final Results of Review
U.S. Department of Commerce. 7213.91.4510, 7213.91.4590, As a result of this review, we
SUMMARY: On November 16, 2016, the 7213.91.6010, 7213.91.6090, determine that the following margin
Department of Commerce (the 7213.99.0031, 7213.99.0038, exists for the POR:
Department) published the preliminary 7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0010,
results of the administrative review of 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0090, Weighted-
the antidumping duty order on carbon average
7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6051, Producer/exporter dumping
and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire 7227.90.6053, 7227.90.6058, and margin
rod) from Mexico. The period of review 7227.90.6059. Although the HTS (percent)
(POR) is October 1, 2014, through numbers are provided for convenience
September 30, 2015, and the review and customs purposes, the written Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V ............ 40.52
covers two producers/exporters of product description remains
subject merchandise: ArcelorMittal Las dispositive.4 Final Determination of No Shipments
Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT) and As stated in the Preliminary Results,
Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Deacero). Analysis of Comments Received
AMLT reported that it made no sales of
Based on our analysis of the comments All issues raised in the case and subject merchandise during the POR.5
received, we made certain changes to rebuttal briefs by parties to this We received no comments from
our preliminary findings for Deacero. proceeding are addressed in the Issues interested parties with respect to the
The final weighted-average dumping and Decision Memorandum. A list of Department’s preliminary determination
margin for the reviewed producers/ the issues that parties raised and to of no shipments for AMLT, and we
exporters are listed below in the section which we responded is attached to this continue to determine that AMLT had
entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ notice as an Appendix. The Issues and no reviewable transactions during the
DATES: Effective May 22, 2017. Decision Memorandum is a public POR. As noted in the ‘‘Assessment
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rates’’ section below, the Department
1 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
James Terpstra (for Deacero) and Jolanta intends to issue appropriate instructions
from Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Lawska (for AMLT), AD/CVD Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 80638 (November 16, 2016) (Preliminary Results) (CBP) for AMLT based on the final
Compliance, International Trade and accompanying Preliminary Decision results of this review.
Memorandum.
Administration, U.S. Department of 2 Nucor Corporation (Nucor) is a domestic Assessment Rates
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue interested party.
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 3 See Memorandum regarding Antidumping Duty
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
202–482–3965 and 202–482–8362, Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
respectively. Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Extension of Time Department has determined, and CBP
Limit for Final Results, dated January 20, 2017. shall assess, antidumping duties on all
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 4 See Decision Memorandum for Final Results of
appropriate entries of subject
2014/15 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Background Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
merchandise in accordance with the
Mexico (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated
On November 16, 2016, the concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 5 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 80639, and
Department published in the Federal notice for a complete description of the scope of the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Register the Preliminary Results of the order. at 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:17 May 19, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_23285/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:51:01
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:51:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective May 22, 2017. | |
| Contact | Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3857. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 23188 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR