82 FR 23192 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 97 (May 22, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 97 (May 22, 2017)
| Page Range | 23192-23195 | |
| FR Document | 2017-10346 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 97 (Monday, May 22, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 23192-23195] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-10346] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-489-829] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that imports of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. For information on the estimated weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV, see the ``Final Determination'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective May 22, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo or Alex Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371 or (202) 482-4956, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 7, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Determination of this antidumping duty [[Page 23193]] (AD) investigation.\1\ The petitioner in this investigation is the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members.\2\ The mandatory respondents in this investigation are Haba[scedil] Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal End[uuml]strisi A.[Scedil]. (Habas) and Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.[Scedil]. (Icdas). Both Habas and Icdas participated in this investigation. A complete summary of the events that occurred since publication of the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.\3\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the Department's main building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 82 FR 12791 (March 7, 2017) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ The Rebar Trade Action Coalition is comprised of Byer Steel Group, Inc., Commercial Metals Company, Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Nucor Corporation, and Steel Dynamics, Inc. \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The scope of the investigation covers rebar from Turkey. The Department did not receive any scope comments and has not updated the scope of the investigation since the Preliminary Determination. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I to this notice. Analysis of Comments Received The issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal briefs submitted by interested parties in this proceeding are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties and responded to by the Department in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached at Appendix II to this notice. Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), during March 2017, the Department verified the sales and cost data reported by Habas and Icdas. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original source documents provided by the respondents. Use of Adverse Facts Available In making this final determination, the Department relied, in part, on facts available. As discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,\4\ we determine that Icdas withheld necessary information with respect to manufacturer of certain home market sales made by affiliates during the POI and, accordingly, did not act to the best of its ability in responding to the Department's request for information. Therefore, we drew an adverse inference, where appropriate, in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\5\ For further information, see the ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4 and Comment 10. \5\ See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the margin calculations since the Preliminary Determination. These changes are discussed in the ``Analysis of Programs'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. All-Others Rate In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, the Department calculated a dumping margin for the individually investigated exporters/producers of the subject merchandise. Consistent with sections 735(c)(1)(B)(i)(II) and 735(c)(5) of the Act, the Department also calculated an estimated ``all-others'' rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the ``all-others'' rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted-average of the estimated weighted- average dumping margins established for individually investigated exporters and producers, excluding any margins that are zero or de minimis or any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. Because the estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Habas and Icdas are not zero or de minimis or based entirely on facts available under section 776 of the Act, we calculated the all- others rate using a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents using each company's publicly-ranged values for the merchandise under consideration, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ With two respondents, we would normally calculate (A) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents using each company's publicly-ranged values for the merchandise under consideration. We would compare (B) and (C) to (A) and select the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all other companies. See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010); see also Memorandum to the File, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Calculation of the Margin for All Others Rate for the Final Determination,'' dated May 15, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination The Department determines the estimated weighted-average dumping margins to be: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Estimated Cash deposit weighted- rate adjusted Company average for subsidy dumping margin offset(s)) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal 5.39 5.18 Endustrisi A.S......................... Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim 8.17 8.00 Sanayi A.S............................. [[Page 23194]] All-Others.............................. 6.94 6.77 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b), we will disclose the calculations performed within five days of any public announcement of this notice. Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of rebar from Turkey, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 7, 2017, the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination. Furthermore, the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise. The Department normally adjusts cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties by the amount of export subsidies countervailed in a companion countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding, when CVD provisional measures are in effect. Accordingly, where the Department made an affirmative determination for countervailable export subsidies, the Department has offset the estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the appropriate CVD rate.\7\ Any such adjusted cash deposit rate may be found in the ``Final Determination'' section, above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Memorandum to the File, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final Calculation Memorandum for Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S.,'' dated concurrently with this Notice; See also Memorandum to the File, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final Margin Calculation for Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S.,'' dated concurrently with this Notice; See also Memorandum to the File, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final Calculation for the `All Others' Rate,'' dated concurrently with this Notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of rebar from Turkey no later than 45 days after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue an AD order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the ``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 15, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise subject to this investigation is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack thereof. Subject merchandise includes deformed steel wire with bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and which has been subjected to an elongation test. The subject merchandise includes rebar that has been further processed in the subject country or a third country, including but not limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the rebar. Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or smooth rebar). Also excluded from the scope is deformed steel wire meeting ASTM A1064/A1064M with no bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and without being subject to an elongation test. The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope remains dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Scope Comments V. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination VI. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inferences VII. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether Respondents' Duty Drawback Adjustment Should be Granted as Reported and How to Calculate any Adjustment Comment 2: Whether Respondents' Margins Should be Calculated Using Quarterly Cost Habas Comment 3: Whether the U.S. Date of Sale is the Contract Date Comment 4: Whether the Department Should Impute Interest Expense on Zero-Interest Financing Provided by Anadolubank Comment 5: Whether Zero-Interest Loans Should be Included in the Interest Rate for CREDITH Icdas Comment 6: Whether the Department Should Revise Icdas' Costs Consistent with Turkish GAAP [[Page 23195]] Comment 7: Whether the Department Should Revise Icdas' Short- Length Rebar Cost Comment 8: Whether the Department Should Disallow Offsets to Icdas' G&A Expenses for Reimbursements Related to Port Services Provided to Third Parties Comment 9: Whether the Department Should Revise the Manufacturer Code Assignments in the Home Market Resellers' Sales File in the Comparison Market Program Comment 10: Whether the Department Should Apply Partial AFA to Icdas with Respect to Missing Manufacturer Codes in the Home Market Resellers Sales File Comment 11: Whether the Department Should Adjust Normal Value for Certain Home Market Movement Expenses Comment 12: Whether the Department Should Use the Correct Home Market Credit Expense Amount CREDIT2H in its Calculation of Normal Value Comment 13a: Whether the Department Should Adjust Arten's Sales to Exclude VAT Comment 13b: Whether the Department Should Adjust Home Market Freight Expense for Certain Sales in Order to Eliminate Understatement of this Expense Due to Double Counting of VAT Comment 14: Whether the Department Should Use the Correct Home Market Gross Unite Price Data in its Margin Calculation Comment 15: Whether the Department Should Continue to Differentiate Between Air and Water Cooled Rebar Comment 16: Whether the Department Should Reconsider and Reverse its Decision to Refuse to Accept Icdas' Timely and Properly Submitted Minor Corrections of February 15, 2017 Comment 17: Whether the Computer Programming Error Regarding Icdas' Ending Period Date for U.S. Sales Should be Corrected VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-10346 Filed 5-19-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![23192 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 97 / Monday, May 22, 2017 / Notices
structure of proteins, and to make Docket Number: 17–006. Applicant: curable photoresists. The key and
movies of molecular machines at work. The Association of Universities for unique features of the instrument
It is capable of fabricating structures as Research in Astronomy, 3665 Discovery include the highest resolution (150
small as 0.2 microns on a side, which Drive, Boulder, CO 80303. Instrument: nanometers) among all commercially
are not limited to a planar geometry, M1 Cell Assembly. Manufacturer: available 3D printers and ability to
using nozzles whose overall size is a Advanced Mechanical & Optical deposit a wide variety of materials
few millimeters, with finest detail of 0.5 Systems, NA, Belgium. Intended Use: template by transparent polymers. The
microns. Justification for Duty-Free The instrument will be used to study high printing resolution enables sub-
Entry: There are no instruments of the the highly dynamic magnetic fields and micron feature sizes and allows a design
same general category manufactured in plasmas throughout the solar freedom for very complex parts with
the United States. Application accepted atmosphere. It will provide the internal features otherwise impossible
by Commissioner of Customs: March 17, necessary means to support, shape and to produce. Justification for Duty-Free
2017. cool the DKIST primary mirror, without Entry: There are no instruments of the
Docket Number: 17–004. Applicant: which the primary mirror would not same general category manufactured in
Trustees of Tufts College, 200 Boston meet the stringent performance the United States. Application accepted
Avenue, Suite 2600, Medford, MA characteristics for conducting the by Commissioner of Customs: April 24,
02155–4284. Instrument: Microscopy experiments. The instrument will be 2017.
Image Acquisition Unit. Manufacturer: able to accurately adjust the M1 Mirror
optical surface by applying arbitrary Gregory W. Campbell,
Phaseview, France. Intended Use: The
Zernike correction terms to correct for Director, Subsidies Enforcement, Enforcement
instrument will be used to produce 3D and Compliance.
images of objects in regular light telescope errors in addition to polishing
errors and M1 Cell Assembly induced [FR Doc. 2017–10401 Filed 5–19–17; 8:45 am]
microscopy, for example, biological
cells, the surface of teeth, and polymers. errors. After optics correction, the total BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The unique and required features allowed M1 Mirror optical surface figure
include an andor camera connected to error from all sources other than
polishing residuals shall be less than 45 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
piezo driving optical objective, 3–D
imaging device that uses a liquid-crystal nm RMS after subtraction of tip tilt and
focus. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: International Trade Administration
focusing technology and so-called Ray
technology to record 3–D information in There are no instruments of the same
general category manufactured in the [A–489–829]
one shot, and very fast mechanical
noise-free recording of 3–D images of United States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: April 24, Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
surfaces and cells. Justification for Duty- the Republic of Turkey: Final
Free Entry: There are no instruments of 2017.
Docket Number: 17–007. Applicant: Determination of Sales at Less Than
the same general category manufactured Fair Value
The Association of Universities for
in the United States. Application
Research in Astronomy, 3665 Discovery
accepted by Commissioner of Customs: AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Drive, Boulder, CO 80303. Instrument:
April 3, 2017. International Trade Administration,
Coating and Cleaning Equipment for the
Docket Number: 17–005. Applicant: Department of Commerce.
Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope.
Boston University, 110 Cummington SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Manufacturer: Advanced Mechanical &
Mall, ENG 107, Boston, MA 02215. Optical Systems, NA, Belgium. Intended (the Department) determines that
Instrument: Positioner for a prototype Use: The instrument will be used to imports of steel concrete reinforcing bar
Schwarzchild Couder Telescope (pSCT). study the highly dynamic magnetic (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey
Manufacturer: DESY- fields and plasmas throughout the solar (Turkey) are being, or are likely to be,
DeutchesElektronen-Synchrotron, atmosphere. The M1 Wash Platform sold in the United States at less than fair
Germany. Intended Use: The instrument shall be capable of capturing washing value (LTFV). The period of
will be used in material science effluent and directing it into a investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015,
research, using a fiber laser to induce containment system, which shall through June 30, 2016. For information
two-photon polymerization in the target include pumping capacity to move the on the estimated weighted-average
material. Through sophisticated effluent from the containment system dumping margins of sales at LTFV, see
coordination of an X–Y stage and a into AURA supplied containers, as well the ‘‘Final Determination’’ section of
galvo-scanner, a structure designed in a as protect effluent from contaminating this notice.
standard CAD tool can be transferred to the bottom surface of the M1 Mirror or DATES: Effective May 22, 2017.
a cube of photosensitive material in a any other surface. Justification for Duty- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
matter of minutes. The instrument is Free Entry: There are no instruments of Myrna Lobo or Alex Cipolla, AD/CVD
capable of lateral feature sizes for 3D the same general category manufactured Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
structures of less than 200 nm, and less in the United States. Application Compliance, International Trade
than 150 nm for 2D structures. The accepted by Commissioner of Customs: Administration, U.S. Department of
instrument is able to fabricate structures April 24, 2017. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
up to 300 mm height with constant high Docket Number: 17–008. Applicant: NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
resolution and quality independent of UChicago Argonne, 9700 South Cass (202) 482–2371 or (202) 482–4956,
the structure height by means of a dip- Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439. Instrument:
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
respectively.
in-laser lithography technique. Multiphoton 3D Lithography System.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There Manufacturer: Nanoscribe, Germany. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
are no instruments of the same general Intended Use: The instrument will be Background
category manufactured in the United used for rapid fabrication and
States. Application accepted by prototyping of micro and nano sized On March 7, 2017, the Department
Commissioner of Customs: April 24, parts by the means of novel technology, published the Preliminary
2017. two-photon polymerization of UV- Determination of this antidumping duty
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:17 May 19, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_23289/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 97 / Monday, May 22, 2017 / Notices 23195
Comment 7: Whether the Department DATES: Effective May 22, 2017. modification to the Department’s
Should Revise Icdas’ Short-Length Rebar FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: findings in the Final Results.
Cost Within fifteen days of publication of
Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla,
Comment 8: Whether the Department
Should Disallow Offsets to Icdas’ G&A AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, these Amended Final Results, we will
Expenses for Reimbursements Related to Enforcement and Compliance, instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Port Services Provided to Third Parties International Trade Administration, Protection to liquidate all unliquidated
Comment 9: Whether the Department U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 entries of fresh garlic from the PRC
Should Revise the Manufacturer Code Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, produced and/or exported by Weifang
Assignments in the Home Market DC 20230: telephone: (202) 482–6251 or Hongqiao International Logistics Co.,
Resellers’ Sales File in the Comparison (202) 482–4956, respectively. Ltd., Qingdao Xintianfeng Foods Co.,
Market Program SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following Ltd., and Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang
Comment 10: Whether the Department Import and Export Co., Ltd., and
the publication of the Final Results,
Should Apply Partial AFA to Icdas with
Respect to Missing Manufacturer Codes Weifang Hongqiao International entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
in the Home Market Resellers Sales File Logistics Co., Ltd., Qingdao Xintianfeng for consumption in the United States
Comment 11: Whether the Department Foods Co., Ltd., and Shandong Jinxiang during the POR at the assessment rate of
Should Adjust Normal Value for Certain Zhengyang Import and Export Co., Ltd. $0.00 per kilogram.
Home Market Movement Expenses (collectively, Separate Rate We are issuing and publishing these
Comment 12: Whether the Department Respondents) challenged the Amended Final Results of review and
Should Use the Correct Home Market Department’s Final Results in the notice in accordance with section
Credit Expense Amount CREDIT2H in its United States Court of International 516A(e) of the Act.
Calculation of Normal Value Trade (CIT). In the Final Results, the
Comment 13a: Whether the Department Dated: May 15, 2017.
Department calculated a de minimis rate
Should Adjust Arten’s Sales to Exclude Ronald K. Lorentzen,
VAT for the two mandatory respondents, but
found that averaging the mandatory Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
Comment 13b: Whether the Department and Compliance.
Should Adjust Home Market Freight respondents’ de minimis rates would
[FR Doc. 2017–10350 Filed 5–19–17; 8:45 am]
Expense for Certain Sales in Order to not be reasonably reflective of the
Eliminate Understatement of this potential dumping margins of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Expense Due to Double Counting of VAT companies not selected for individual
Comment 14: Whether the Department examination.1 The Department found
Should Use the Correct Home Market the Separate Rate Respondents eligible DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Gross Unite Price Data in its Margin for a separate rate, but did not select
Calculation International Trade Administration
them for individual examination.2 The
Comment 15: Whether the Department
Should Continue to Differentiate Department established the dumping
margin for the Separate Rate [A–588–876]
Between Air and Water Cooled Rebar
Comment 16: Whether the Department Respondents by applying the most
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
Should Reconsider and Reverse its recently-calculated rate under this
Japan: Final Affirmative Determination
Decision to Refuse to Accept Icdas’ order, which was not affected by the
Timely and Properly Submitted Minor of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
Department’s zeroing methodology, i.e.,
Corrections of February 15, 2017 $1.28 per kilogram, the rate in the 08/ AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Comment 17: Whether the Computer 09 Garlic NSR.3 The Separate Rate
Programming Error Regarding Icdas’ International Trade Administration,
Respondents challenged the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Ending Period Date for U.S. Sales Should
Department’s selection of the $1.28 per SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
be Corrected
VIII. Recommendation kilogram dumping margin.4 (the Department) determines that
On April 14, 2017, the United States, imports of steel concrete reinforcing bar
[FR Doc. 2017–10346 Filed 5–19–17; 8:45 am]
the Separate Rate Respondents, and the (rebar) from Japan are being, or are
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
petitioner 5 entered into an agreement to likely to be, sold in the United States at
settle this dispute. On April 17, 2017,
less than fair value (LTFV). The period
the United States, the Separate Rate
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015,
Respondents, and the petitioner filed a
through June 30, 2016. The final
International Trade Administration stipulation for entry of judgment with
dumping margins of sales at LTFV are
the CIT. On April 19, 2017, the CIT
listed below in the ‘‘Final
[A–570–831] entered judgment by stipulation.
Determination’’ section of this notice.
Consistent with the settlement
Fresh Garlic From the People’s agreement and the judgment by DATES: Effective May 22, 2017.
Republic of China: Amended Final stipulation, these Amended Final FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Results of Antidumping Duty Results assign each Separate Rate David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations,
Administrative Review; 2010–2011 Respondent a $0.00 per kilogram Office VII, Enforcement and
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, dumping margin for the POR. The Compliance, International Trade
International Trade Administration, Amended Final Results make no other Administration, U.S. Department of
Department of Commerce. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
1 IDM at 4. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
2 IDM at 3–4. (202) 482–3870.
(the Department) is amending its final 3 Final Results, 78 FR at 36169.
results of the administrative review of 4 Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the antidumping duty order on fresh Ltd. et al. v. United States, Consol. Case No. 13–
Background
garlic from the People’s Republic of 00228.
5 The Fresh Garlic Producers Association and its
China (PRC) for the period of review is On March 7, 2017, the Department
individual members, Christopher Ranch, LLC, the
November 1, 2010, through October 31, Garlic Company, Valley Garlic, and Vessey and
published the Preliminary
2011. Company, Inc. Determination of this antidumping duty
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:17 May 19, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_23289/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:49:49
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:49:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective May 22, 2017. | |
| Contact | Myrna Lobo or Alex Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371 or (202) 482-4956, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 23192 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR