82_FR_24130 82 FR 24030 - Airworthiness Directives; Piper Aircraft, Inc. Airplanes

82 FR 24030 - Airworthiness Directives; Piper Aircraft, Inc. Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 100 (May 25, 2017)

Page Range24030-24033
FR Document2017-10407

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, and PA-31-350 airplanes. This AD was prompted by fatigue cracking in the fuselage station (FS) 332.00 bulkhead common to the horizontal stabilizer front spar attachment. This AD requires repetitive inspections to detect cracks in the bulkhead and any necessary repairs. This AD also provides an optional modification if no cracks are found that will greatly reduce the likelihood of the specified cracks. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 100 (Thursday, May 25, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 100 (Thursday, May 25, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24030-24033]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9550; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-026-AD; 
Amendment 39-18894; AD 2017-10-20]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Piper Aircraft, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 
Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, and PA-31-350 
airplanes. This AD was prompted by fatigue cracking in the fuselage 
station (FS) 332.00 bulkhead common to the horizontal stabilizer front 
spar attachment. This AD requires repetitive inspections to detect 
cracks in the bulkhead and any necessary repairs. This AD also provides 
an optional modification if no cracks are found that will greatly 
reduce the likelihood of the specified cracks. We are issuing this AD 
to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 29, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of June 29, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, 
contact Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Service, 2926 Piper Drive, Vero 
Beach, Florida 32960; telephone: (877) 879-0275; fax: none; email: 
[email protected]; Internet: www.piper.com. You may view this 
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the 
availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148. It is 
also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9550.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9550; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this AD, the regulatory

[[Page 24031]]

evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address 
for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management 
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory ``Keith'' Noles, Aerospace 
Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, 1701 Columbia 
Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 
474-5606; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Piper Aircraft, 
Inc. Models PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, and PA-31-350 airplanes. The 
NPRM published in the Federal Register on January 3, 2017 (82 FR 48). 
The NPRM was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking in the FS 332.00 
bulkhead common to the horizontal stabilizer front spar attachment on 
Piper Aircraft, Inc. PA-31 airplanes. Cracks in the bulkhead could 
compromise the structural component's capability to carry flight loads, 
increasing the potential to overload and fail adjacent structure. The 
NPRM proposed to provide an optional modification if no cracks are 
found that will greatly reduce the likelihood of the specified cracks. 
We are issuing this AD to detect and repair cracks in the bulkhead that 
could lead to structural failure and result in loss of control.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and 
the FAA's response to each comment.

Request Change to Labor Estimates

    Joe M. Miller, Chief Inspector for Warbelow's Air Ventures, Inc. in 
Fairbanks, Alaska, stated they have complied with the proposed 
requirement on 3 airplanes and find that it takes 2 mechanics about 6 
hours each (12 man-hours) to accomplish just the inspection phase. The 
commenter states that to better access the affected areas it is easier 
to remove both horizontal stabilizers. In total, it takes a crew of 2 
about 4 days (64 man-hours) to accomplish the complete process from 
inspection to return to service.
    We partially agree. We agree with revising the labor estimates for 
both the inspection and modification because of the additional operator 
data. Also, we will ensure the access time is included in both the 
inspection and modification estimates. Because the original time 
estimate was provided by another experienced operator, we will update 
the estimate to reflect an average of the two reported times. We 
disagree with using a combined estimate of 64 hours because the 
inspection and modification are estimated separately. We will make the 
following changes to the AD based on this comment:
     Update the inspection labor estimate from 1 hour to 12 
hours; and
     Update the modification labor estimate from 26 to 45 
hours.

Question on Airplanes That Have Previously Complied

    Joe M. Miller, Chief Inspector, Warbelow's Air Ventures, Inc., 
Fairbanks, Alaska, asked that we provide reference to those airplanes 
that have previously complied with Service Bulletin 1289A and installed 
kit 88578-001 Rev B. The commenter stated the NPRM only addresses the 
initial inspection and modification of FS 332 and does not address 
airplanes that have previously complied with Piper MSB 1289A by 
inspection and subsequent installation of the Piper Kit 88578-001 Rev 
B.
    We do not agree because paragraph (f) of the AD addresses this 
situation with the phrase ``unless already done.''
    We have not changed the AD based on this comment.

Request To Extend the Initial Compliance Time

    Roger Braun asked that we extend the initial compliance time 
because his impression is that the cracks were found solely on one very 
high-time (20,000 hour plus) airplane, and he perceives 3,000 hours 
time-in-service (TIS) as too early to start the inspection intervals 
based on the finding.
    We do not agree because the airplane design is intended to provide 
a service life that is crack-free. When cracks are found in service, a 
management program is put in place (reference Advisory Circular 91-82). 
It is true that the crack was found on an airplane with over 20,000 
hours. The compliance time for the management program is based on the 
known failure time but must include safety and statistical reduction 
factors (reference Advisory Circular 23-13). Starting inspections at 
3,000 hours TIS ensures any cracks that form will be found early enough 
to prevent an unsafe condition. While it may appear excessive, the 
compliance time is set to meet the design intent of a crack-free 
operation.
    We have not changed the AD based on this comment.

Request for a Visual Inspection

    Roger Braun asked that we allow for a visual inspection instead of 
a penetrant inspection because the parts involve a simple visual 
inspection. The commenter suggested that 10x glass would suffice 
instead of stripping paint and doing a dye-penetrant inspection. Then, 
a penetrant could be used if any cracks are suspected.
    We do not agree because the cleaning and penetrant method has 
higher detection reliability than a purely visual method. The 
reliability of the inspection method is tied to the compliance time for 
the repetitive inspection and deferral of the permanent modification. 
Once the AD is published, the commenter may request an alternative 
method of compliance (AMOC) for the visual inspection method. The 
request, including all substantiating data, may be submitted following 
14 CFR 39.19 as specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
    We have not changed the AD based on this comment.

Clarification on Installation of the Kit

    Tim Glubaskas, Director of Maintenance, Warbelow's Air Ventures, 
asked for a clarification on whether installation of the kit terminates 
the repetitive inspections.
    That kit installation is terminating action for the repetitive 
inspection. This is addressed in paragraph (g)(3)(i) of this AD when 
the kit is used as a repair for cracks and in paragraph (g)(4) of this 
AD when the kit is used as a modification with no cracks.
    We have not changed the AD based on this comment.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial 
changes. We have determined that these changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the 
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

[[Page 24032]]

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Piper Aircraft, Inc. Service Bulletin No. 1289A, dated 
October 26, 2016. The service information describes procedures for the 
repetitive inspections, necessary repairs, and the optional 
modification of the bulkhead. This service information is reasonably 
available because the interested parties have access to it through 
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the 
ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 955 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Cost per      Cost on U.S.
             Action                    Labor cost              Parts cost             product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect for cracks in the         12 work-hours x $85  Not Applicable...........          $1,020        $974,100
 bulkhead.                         per hour = $1,020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs/
replacements that would be required based on the results of the 
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes that 
might need these repairs/replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                   Cost per
                    Action                                Labor cost              Parts cost        product
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair/Modification..........................  45 work-hours x $85 per hour =             $296          $4,121
                                                $3,825.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2017-10-20 Piper Aircraft, Inc.: Amendment 39-18894; Docket No. FAA-
2016-9550; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-026-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective June 29, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Piper Aircraft, Inc. Navajo Models PA-31, PA-
31-300, and PA-31-325, serial numbers 31-2 through 31-900, and 31-
7300901 through 31-8312019; and Chieftain/T-1020 Models PA-31-350, 
serial numbers 31-5001 through 31-5004, and 31-7305005 through 31-
8553002, certificated in any category.
    Note 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD: The Model PA-31 may also be 
identified as a PA-31-310 even though the PA-31-310 is not a model 
recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on the type 
certificate data sheet.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association 
(ATA) of America Code 5312: Fuselage--Main Bulkhead.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by fatigue cracking in the fuselage station 
(FS) 332.00 bulkhead common to the horizontal stabilizer front spar 
attachment. This AD requires repetitive inspections to detect cracks 
in the bulkhead and any necessary repairs. This AD also provides an 
optional modification if no cracks are found that will greatly 
reduce the likelihood of the specified cracks. Cracks in the 
bulkhead could compromise the structural components capability to 
carry flight loads, increasing the potential to overload and fail 
adjacent structure and lead to loss of control.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with paragraphs (g)(1) through (3) of this AD within the 
compliance times specified, unless already done.

[[Page 24033]]

(g) Actions

    (1) For airplanes with 3,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) or less 
as of June 29, 2017 (the effective date of this AD): Initially 
within 500 hours TIS after reaching 3,000 hours TIS and repetitively 
thereafter every 200 hours TIS, inspect the fuselage station (FS) 
332.00 bulkhead assembly for cracks following the instructions in 
Part I of Piper Aircraft, Inc. Service Bulletin (SB) No. 1289A, 
dated October 26, 2016.
    (2) For airplanes with over 3,000 hours TIS as of June 29, 2017 
(the effective date of this AD): Initially within the next 500 hours 
TIS after June 29, 2017 (the effective date of this AD) and 
repetitively thereafter every 200 hours TIS, inspect the FS 332.00 
bulkhead assembly for cracks, following the instructions in Part I 
of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated October 26, 2016.
    (3) If cracks are found during any of the inspections required 
in paragraphs (g)(1) or (2) of this AD, before further flight, 
repair the cracks following the modification instructions in Part II 
of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated October 26, 2016, and 
one of the following as applicable:
    (i) If the crack does not extend beyond the inspection/template 
area of figure 2 of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated October 
26, 2016, and meets the minimum acceptable distance in figure 3 and 
table 2 of Part II of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated 
October 26, 2016, then the installation of Piper Kit 88578-001 
Revision B, dated June 23, 2016, is acceptable as a repair and is 
considered terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
requirement in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.
    (ii) If the crack extends beyond the inspection/template area of 
figure 2 of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated October 26, 
2016, or does not meet the minimum acceptable distance in figure 3 
and table 2 of Part II of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated 
October 26, 2016, then the installation of Piper Kit 88578-001 
Revision B, dated June 23, 2016, is not an acceptable repair. You 
must obtain an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) for any 
repair or modification in this area. You may contact Piper Aircraft, 
Inc. for repair instruction development specific to this condition. 
For contact information refer to paragraph (j) of this AD.
    (4) If no cracks are found, you may install Piper Kit 88578-001 
Revision B, dated June 23, 2016, on an uncracked bulkhead following 
the Modification instructions in Part II of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB 
No. 1289A, dated October 26, 2016. Installation of Piper Kit 88578-
001 Revision B, dated June 23, 2016, on an uncracked bulkhead is 
considered terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
requirement in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.

(h) Special Flight Permit

    A special flight permit is allowed for this AD per 14 CFR 39.23 
with limitations. Permits are only allowed for the inspections 
required by this AD and are not allowed if cracks are discovered 
during any inspection following Part I of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB 
No. 1289A, dated October 26, 2016. Any cracks found during any 
inspection must be repaired before further flight.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has 
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight 
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information 
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the 
person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Gregory 
``Keith'' Noles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft 
Certification Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 
30337; phone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 474-5606; email: 
[email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Piper 
Aircraft, Inc., Customer Service, 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, 
Florida 32960; telephone: (877) 879-0275; fax: none; email: 
[email protected]; Internet: www.piper.com. You may review 
the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane 
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
(816) 329-4148.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Gregory ``Keith'' 
Noles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification 
Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: 
(404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 474-5606; email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Piper Aircraft, Inc. Service Bulletin No. 1289A, dated 
October 26, 2016.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Piper Aircraft, Inc. service information identified in 
this AD, contact Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Service, 2926 Piper 
Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; telephone: (877) 879-0275; fax: 
none; email: [email protected]; Internet: www.piper.com.
    (4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, 
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. 
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, 
call 816-329-4148.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 10, 2017.
Melvin Johnson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-10407 Filed 5-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P



     24030              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 100 / Thursday, May 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

     (k) Terminating Action for Certain                      Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:                 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
     Requirements of Other ADs                               Information Collection Clearance Officer,
       (1) Accomplishing the actions required by             AES–200.                                              Federal Aviation Administration
     paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the
                                                             (n) Related Information
     actions required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of                                                                 14 CFR Part 39
     AD 98–25–07.                                              (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
       (2) Accomplishing the actions required by             Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA                 [Docket No. FAA–2016–9550; Directorate
     paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the                 Airworthiness Directive 2015–0232R1, dated            Identifier 2016–CE–026–AD; Amendment
     actions required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of                                                                 39–18894; AD 2017–10–20]
                                                             December 16, 2015, for related information.
     AD 2012–25–06.                                          This MCAI may be found in the AD docket               RIN 2120–AA64
     (l) Reporting Requirements                              on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
        Within 60 days after any inspection                  by searching for and locating Docket No.              Airworthiness Directives; Piper
     required by paragraph (g) of this AD, or                FAA–2015–0084.                                        Aircraft, Inc. Airplanes
     within 60 days after the effective date of this           (2) Service information identified in this
                                                                                                                   AGENCY:  Federal Aviation
     AD, whichever occurs later, report any                  AD that is not incorporated by reference is
     findings, positive or negative, to Airbus               available at the addresses specified in
                                                                                                                   Administration (FAA), DOT.
     Service Bulletin Reporting Online                       paragraphs (o)(3) and (o)(4) of this AD.              ACTION: Final rule.
     Application on Airbus World (https://
     w3.airbus.com/).                                        (o) Material Incorporated by Reference                SUMMARY:   We are adopting a new
                                                                (1) The Director of the Federal Register           airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
     (m) Other FAA AD Provisions
                                                             approved the incorporation by reference               Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA–31, PA–
        The following provisions also apply to this                                                                31–300, PA–31–325, and PA–31–350
     AD:                                                     (IBR) of the service information listed in this
                                                             paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR             airplanes. This AD was prompted by
        (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
     (AMOCs): The Manager, International                     part 51.                                              fatigue cracking in the fuselage station
     Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane                        (2) You must use this service information          (FS) 332.00 bulkhead common to the
     Directorate, FAA, has the authority to                  as applicable to do the actions required by           horizontal stabilizer front spar
     approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested                 this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.          attachment. This AD requires repetitive
     using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.                (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–0261,          inspections to detect cracks in the
     In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your              dated June 11, 2015.                                  bulkhead and any necessary repairs.
     request to your principal inspector or local               (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6117,         This AD also provides an optional
     Flight Standards District Office, as
                                                             dated May 28, 2015.                                   modification if no cracks are found that
     appropriate. If sending information directly
     to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:              (3) For service information identified in          will greatly reduce the likelihood of the
     Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,                         this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness            specified cracks. We are issuing this AD
     International Branch, ANM–116, Transport                Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice                      to correct the unsafe condition on these
     Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind                    Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;                products.
     Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;                      telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61             DATES: This AD is effective June 29,
     telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149.               93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@                 2017.
     Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-               airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com.             The Director of the Federal Register
     AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using                        (4) You may view this service information
     any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate                                                                    approved the incorporation by reference
                                                             at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,           of a certain publication listed in this AD
     principal inspector, or lacking a principal             1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
     inspector, the manager of the local flight                                                                    as of June 29, 2017.
                                                             information on the availability of this
     standards district office/certificate holding                                                                 ADDRESSES: For service information
     district office.                                        material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
                                                                (5) You may view this service information          identified in this final rule, contact
        (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any                                                                   Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Service,
     requirement in this AD to obtain corrective             that is incorporated by reference at the
                                                             National Archives and Records                         2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida
     actions from a manufacturer, the action must
     be accomplished using a method approved                 Administration (NARA). For information on             32960; telephone: (877) 879–0275; fax:
     by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–              the availability of this material at NARA, call       none; email: customer.service@
     116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or            202–741–6030, or go to: http://                       piper.com; Internet: www.piper.com.
     EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved                 www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-            You may view this referenced service
     by the DOA, the approval must include the               locations.html.                                       information at the FAA, Small Airplane
     DOA-authorized signature.                                                                                     Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
        (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal                  Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 2,             Missouri 64106. For information on the
     agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a                2017.
                                                                                                                   availability of this material at the FAA,
     person is not required to respond to, nor               Michael Kaszycki,                                     call (816) 329–4148. It is also available
     shall a person be subject to a penalty for
     failure to comply with a collection of
                                                             Acting Manager, Transport Airplane                    on the internet at http://
     information subject to the requirements of              Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.          www.regulations.gov by searching for
     the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that                 [FR Doc. 2017–10285 Filed 5–24–17; 8:45 am]           and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
     collection of information displays a current            BILLING CODE 4910–13–P                                9550.
     valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
     Control Number for this information                                                                           Examining the AD Docket
     collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for                                                                   You may examine the AD docket on
     this collection of information is estimated to                                                                the Internet at http://
     be approximately 5 minutes per response,                                                                      www.regulations.gov by searching for
     including the time for reviewing instructions,
                                                                                                                   and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
     completing and reviewing the collection of
     information. All responses to this collection                                                                 9550; or in person at the Docket
     of information are mandatory. Comments                                                                        Management Facility between 9 a.m.
     concerning the accuracy of this burden and                                                                    and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
     suggestions for reducing the burden should                                                                    except Federal holidays. The AD docket
     be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence                                                                   contains this AD, the regulatory


VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:57 May 24, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00032   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM   25MYR1


                        Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 100 / Thursday, May 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                          24031

     evaluation, any comments received, and                  inspection and modification because of                meet the design intent of a crack-free
     other information. The address for the                  the additional operator data. Also, we                operation.
     Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is                  will ensure the access time is included                 We have not changed the AD based on
     Document Management Facility, U.S.                      in both the inspection and modification               this comment.
     Department of Transportation, Docket                    estimates. Because the original time
     Operations, M–30, West Building                         estimate was provided by another                      Request for a Visual Inspection
     Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200                        experienced operator, we will update                    Roger Braun asked that we allow for
     New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,                      the estimate to reflect an average of the             a visual inspection instead of a
     DC 20590.                                               two reported times. We disagree with                  penetrant inspection because the parts
     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        using a combined estimate of 64 hours                 involve a simple visual inspection. The
     Gregory ‘‘Keith’’ Noles, Aerospace                      because the inspection and modification               commenter suggested that 10x glass
     Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft                         are estimated separately. We will make                would suffice instead of stripping paint
     Certification Office, 1701 Columbia                     the following changes to the AD based                 and doing a dye-penetrant inspection.
     Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337;                    on this comment:                                      Then, a penetrant could be used if any
     phone: (404) 474–5551; fax: (404) 474–                    • Update the inspection labor                       cracks are suspected.
     5606; email: gregory.noles@faa.gov.                     estimate from 1 hour to 12 hours; and
                                                                                                                     We do not agree because the cleaning
     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                • Update the modification labor
                                                                                                                   and penetrant method has higher
                                                             estimate from 26 to 45 hours.
     Discussion                                                                                                    detection reliability than a purely visual
        We issued a notice of proposed                       Question on Airplanes That Have                       method. The reliability of the inspection
     rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR                       Previously Complied                                   method is tied to the compliance time
     part 39 by adding an AD that would                                                                            for the repetitive inspection and deferral
                                                               Joe M. Miller, Chief Inspector,
     apply to certain Piper Aircraft, Inc.                                                                         of the permanent modification. Once the
                                                             Warbelow’s Air Ventures, Inc.,
     Models PA–31, PA–31–300, PA–31–325,                                                                           AD is published, the commenter may
                                                             Fairbanks, Alaska, asked that we
     and PA–31–350 airplanes. The NPRM                                                                             request an alternative method of
                                                             provide reference to those airplanes that
     published in the Federal Register on                                                                          compliance (AMOC) for the visual
                                                             have previously complied with Service
     January 3, 2017 (82 FR 48). The NPRM                                                                          inspection method. The request,
                                                             Bulletin 1289A and installed kit 88578–
     was prompted by reports of fatigue                                                                            including all substantiating data, may be
                                                             001 Rev B. The commenter stated the
     cracking in the FS 332.00 bulkhead                                                                            submitted following 14 CFR 39.19 as
                                                             NPRM only addresses the initial
     common to the horizontal stabilizer                                                                           specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
                                                             inspection and modification of FS 332
     front spar attachment on Piper Aircraft,                and does not address airplanes that have                We have not changed the AD based on
     Inc. PA–31 airplanes. Cracks in the                     previously complied with Piper MSB                    this comment.
     bulkhead could compromise the                           1289A by inspection and subsequent
     structural component’s capability to                                                                          Clarification on Installation of the Kit
                                                             installation of the Piper Kit 88578–001
     carry flight loads, increasing the                      Rev B.                                                   Tim Glubaskas, Director of
     potential to overload and fail adjacent                   We do not agree because paragraph (f)               Maintenance, Warbelow’s Air Ventures,
     structure. The NPRM proposed to                         of the AD addresses this situation with               asked for a clarification on whether
     provide an optional modification if no                  the phrase ‘‘unless already done.’’                   installation of the kit terminates the
     cracks are found that will greatly reduce                                                                     repetitive inspections.
                                                               We have not changed the AD based on
     the likelihood of the specified cracks.
                                                             this comment.                                            That kit installation is terminating
     We are issuing this AD to detect and
                                                                                                                   action for the repetitive inspection. This
     repair cracks in the bulkhead that could                Request To Extend the Initial
                                                                                                                   is addressed in paragraph (g)(3)(i) of this
     lead to structural failure and result in                Compliance Time
                                                                                                                   AD when the kit is used as a repair for
     loss of control.
                                                                Roger Braun asked that we extend the               cracks and in paragraph (g)(4) of this AD
     Comments                                                initial compliance time because his                   when the kit is used as a modification
       We gave the public the opportunity to                 impression is that the cracks were found              with no cracks.
     participate in developing this AD. The                  solely on one very high-time (20,000                     We have not changed the AD based on
     following presents the comments                         hour plus) airplane, and he perceives                 this comment.
     received on the NPRM and the FAA’s                      3,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) as too
                                                             early to start the inspection intervals               Conclusion
     response to each comment.
                                                             based on the finding.                                   We reviewed the relevant data,
     Request Change to Labor Estimates                          We do not agree because the airplane               considered the comments received, and
        Joe M. Miller, Chief Inspector for                   design is intended to provide a service               determined that air safety and the
     Warbelow’s Air Ventures, Inc. in                        life that is crack-free. When cracks are              public interest require adopting this AD
     Fairbanks, Alaska, stated they have                     found in service, a management                        with the changes described previously
     complied with the proposed                              program is put in place (reference                    and minor editorial changes. We have
     requirement on 3 airplanes and find that                Advisory Circular 91–82). It is true that             determined that these changes:
     it takes 2 mechanics about 6 hours each                 the crack was found on an airplane with
                                                             over 20,000 hours. The compliance time                  • Are consistent with the intent that
     (12 man-hours) to accomplish just the
                                                             for the management program is based on                was proposed in the NPRM for
     inspection phase. The commenter states
                                                             the known failure time but must include               correcting the unsafe condition; and
     that to better access the affected areas it
     is easier to remove both horizontal                     safety and statistical reduction factors                • Do not add any additional burden
     stabilizers. In total, it takes a crew of 2             (reference Advisory Circular 23–13).                  upon the public than was already
     about 4 days (64 man-hours) to                          Starting inspections at 3,000 hours TIS               proposed in the NPRM.
     accomplish the complete process from                    ensures any cracks that form will be                    We also determined that these
     inspection to return to service.                        found early enough to prevent an unsafe               changes will not increase the economic
        We partially agree. We agree with                    condition. While it may appear                        burden on any operator or increase the
     revising the labor estimates for both the               excessive, the compliance time is set to              scope of this AD.


VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:57 May 24, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00033   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM   25MYR1


     24032                  Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 100 / Thursday, May 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

     Related Service Information Under 1                                 and the optional modification of the                       Costs of Compliance
     CFR Part 51                                                         bulkhead. This service information is
                                                                         reasonably available because the                             We estimate that this AD affects 955
       We reviewed Piper Aircraft, Inc.                                                                                             airplanes of U.S. registry.
     Service Bulletin No. 1289A, dated                                   interested parties have access to it
     October 26, 2016. The service                                       through their normal course of business                      We estimate the following costs to
     information describes procedures for the                            or by the means identified in the                          comply with this AD:
     repetitive inspections, necessary repairs,                          ADDRESSES section.

                                                                                         ESTIMATED COSTS
                                                                                                                                                        Cost per     Cost on U.S.
                               Action                                                         Labor cost                          Parts cost            product       operators

     Inspect for cracks in the bulkhead ...............              12 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,020 .....              Not Applicable ....           $1,020       $974,100



       We estimate the following costs to do                             of the inspection. We have no way of                       that might need these repairs/
     any necessary repairs/replacements that                             determining the number of airplanes                        replacements:
     would be required based on the results

                                                                                       ON-CONDITION COSTS
                                                                                                                                                                     Cost per
                                     Action                                                                  Labor cost                             Parts cost       product

     Repair/Modification ......................................................    45 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,825 ....................               $296         $4,121



     Authority for This Rulemaking                                         (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under                  (b) Affected ADs
                                                                         DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures                       None.
        Title 49 of the United States Code                               (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
     specifies the FAA’s authority to issue                                                                                         (c) Applicability
                                                                           (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
     rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,                                                                                            This AD applies to Piper Aircraft, Inc.
                                                                         in Alaska, and
     section 106, describes the authority of                                                                                        Navajo Models PA–31, PA–31–300, and PA–
     the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:                                  (4) Will not have a significant                          31–325, serial numbers 31–2 through 31–900,
     Aviation Programs, describes in more                                economic impact, positive or negative,                     and 31–7300901 through 31–8312019; and
     detail the scope of the Agency’s                                    on a substantial number of small entities                  Chieftain/T–1020 Models PA–31–350, serial
     authority.                                                          under the criteria of the Regulatory                       numbers 31–5001 through 31–5004, and 31–
                                                                         Flexibility Act.                                           7305005 through 31–8553002, certificated in
        We are issuing this rulemaking under                                                                                        any category.
     the authority described in Subtitle VII,                            List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39                           Note 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD: The
     Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:                                                                                            Model PA–31 may also be identified as a PA–
     ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that                                  Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
                                                                                                                                    31–310 even though the PA–31–310 is not a
     section, Congress charges the FAA with                              safety, Incorporation by reference,
                                                                                                                                    model recognized by the Federal Aviation
     promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in                          Safety.                                                    Administration (FAA) on the type certificate
     air commerce by prescribing regulations                             Adoption of the Amendment                                  data sheet.
     for practices, methods, and procedures
                                                                           Accordingly, under the authority                         (d) Subject
     the Administrator finds necessary for
     safety in air commerce. This regulation                             delegated to me by the Administrator,                        Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
     is within the scope of that authority                               the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as                           Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
                                                                         follows:                                                   Code 5312: Fuselage—Main Bulkhead.
     because it addresses an unsafe condition
     that is likely to exist or develop on                                                                                          (e) Unsafe Condition
     products identified in this rulemaking                              PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
                                                                                                                                       This AD was prompted by fatigue cracking
     action.                                                             DIRECTIVES
                                                                                                                                    in the fuselage station (FS) 332.00 bulkhead
                                                                                                                                    common to the horizontal stabilizer front
     Regulatory Findings                                                 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39                    spar attachment. This AD requires repetitive
                                                                         continues to read as follows:                              inspections to detect cracks in the bulkhead
       This AD will not have federalism
     implications under Executive Order                                      Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.             and any necessary repairs. This AD also
                                                                                                                                    provides an optional modification if no
     13132. This AD will not have a                                      § 39.13      [Amended]                                     cracks are found that will greatly reduce the
     substantial direct effect on the States, on                                                                                    likelihood of the specified cracks. Cracks in
     the relationship between the national                               ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding                      the bulkhead could compromise the
     government and the States, or on the                                the following new airworthiness                            structural components capability to carry
     distribution of power and                                           directive (AD):                                            flight loads, increasing the potential to
     responsibilities among the various                                  2017–10–20 Piper Aircraft, Inc.:                           overload and fail adjacent structure and lead
     levels of government.                                                   Amendment 39–18894; Docket No.                         to loss of control.
       For the reasons discussed above, I                                    FAA–2016–9550; Directorate Identifier
                                                                                                                                    (f) Compliance
     certify that this AD:                                                   2016–CE–026–AD.
                                                                                                                                      Comply with paragraphs (g)(1) through (3)
       (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory                             (a) Effective Date                                         of this AD within the compliance times
     action’’ under Executive Order 12866,                                 This AD is effective June 29, 2017.                      specified, unless already done.



VerDate Sep<11>2014       15:57 May 24, 2017       Jkt 241001     PO 00000        Frm 00034    Fmt 4700    Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM   25MYR1


                        Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 100 / Thursday, May 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                               24033

     (g) Actions                                             (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance                 National Archives and Records
        (1) For airplanes with 3,000 hours time-in-          (AMOCs)                                               Administration (NARA). For information on
     service (TIS) or less as of June 29, 2017 (the             (1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft                  the availability of this material at NARA, call
     effective date of this AD): Initially within 500        Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to       202–741–6030, or go to: http://
     hours TIS after reaching 3,000 hours TIS and            approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested               www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
     repetitively thereafter every 200 hours TIS,            using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.           locations.html.
     inspect the fuselage station (FS) 332.00                In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your              Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May
     bulkhead assembly for cracks following the              request to your principal inspector or local          10, 2017.
     instructions in Part I of Piper Aircraft, Inc.          Flight Standards District Office, as                  Melvin Johnson,
     Service Bulletin (SB) No. 1289A, dated                  appropriate. If sending information directly
     October 26, 2016.                                       to the manager of the ACO, send it to the             Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
        (2) For airplanes with over 3,000 hours TIS          attention of the person identified in                 Aircraft Certification Service.
     as of June 29, 2017 (the effective date of this         paragraph (k) of this AD.                             [FR Doc. 2017–10407 Filed 5–24–17; 8:45 am]
     AD): Initially within the next 500 hours TIS               (2) Before using any approved AMOC,                BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
     after June 29, 2017 (the effective date of this         notify your appropriate principal inspector,
     AD) and repetitively thereafter every 200               or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
     hours TIS, inspect the FS 332.00 bulkhead               of the local flight standards district office/
     assembly for cracks, following the
                                                                                                                   DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                                             certificate holding district office.
     instructions in Part I of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB
     No. 1289A, dated October 26, 2016.                      (j) Related Information                               Federal Aviation Administration
        (3) If cracks are found during any of the               (1) For more information about this AD,
     inspections required in paragraphs (g)(1) or            contact Gregory ‘‘Keith’’ Noles, Aerospace            14 CFR Part 39
     (2) of this AD, before further flight, repair the       Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification
     cracks following the modification                                                                             [Docket No. FAA–2017–0114; Directorate
                                                             Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
     instructions in Part II of Piper Aircraft, Inc.                                                               Identifier 2017–NE–03–AD; Amendment 39–
                                                             Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474–5551; fax:
     SB No. 1289A, dated October 26, 2016, and                                                                     18880; AD 2017–10–06]
                                                             (404) 474–5606; email: gregory.noles@
     one of the following as applicable:                     faa.gov.                                              RIN 2120–AA64
        (i) If the crack does not extend beyond the             (2) For service information identified in
     inspection/template area of figure 2 of Piper           this AD, contact Piper Aircraft, Inc.,                Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
     Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated October              Customer Service, 2926 Piper Drive, Vero
     26, 2016, and meets the minimum acceptable                                                                    plc Turbofan Engines
                                                             Beach, Florida 32960; telephone: (877) 879–
     distance in figure 3 and table 2 of Part II of          0275; fax: none; email: customer.service@             AGENCY:  Federal Aviation
     Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated                piper.com; Internet: www.piper.com. You
     October 26, 2016, then the installation of                                                                    Administration (FAA), DOT.
                                                             may review the referenced service
     Piper Kit 88578–001 Revision B, dated June                                                                    ACTION: Final rule; request for
                                                             information at the FAA, Small Airplane
     23, 2016, is acceptable as a repair and is              Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,                 comments.
     considered terminating action for the
                                                             Missouri 64106. For information on the
     repetitive inspection requirement in
                                                             availability of this material at the FAA, call        SUMMARY:    We are adopting a new
     paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.                                                                         airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
                                                             (816) 329–4148.
        (ii) If the crack extends beyond the                                                                       Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211 Trent 768–
     inspection/template area of figure 2 of Piper           (k) Related Information                               60, 772–60, and 772B–60 turbofan
     Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A, dated October
                                                               For more information about this AD,                 engines. This AD requires fluorescent
     26, 2016, or does not meet the minimum
                                                             contact Gregory ‘‘Keith’’ Noles, Aerospace            penetrant inspection (FPI) of the
     acceptable distance in figure 3 and table 2 of
                                                             Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification         compressor intermediate case (CIC) for
     Part II of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A,
                                                             Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
     dated October 26, 2016, then the installation                                                                 cracking. This AD was prompted by
     of Piper Kit 88578–001 Revision B, dated                Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474–5551; fax:
                                                             (404) 474–5606; email: gregory.noles@                 CICs that were weld repaired and have
     June 23, 2016, is not an acceptable repair.                                                                   a higher probability of cracking as a
     You must obtain an alternative method of                faa.gov.
                                                                                                                   result of the weld repair process. We are
     compliance (AMOC) for any repair or                     (l) Material Incorporated by Reference
     modification in this area. You may contact
                                                                                                                   issuing this AD to correct the unsafe
     Piper Aircraft, Inc. for repair instruction                (1) The Director of the Federal Register           condition on these products.
                                                             approved the incorporation by reference
     development specific to this condition. For                                                                   DATES: This AD becomes effective June
     contact information refer to paragraph (j) of           (IBR) of the service information listed in this
                                                             paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR             9, 2017.
     this AD.                                                                                                         The Director of the Federal Register
        (4) If no cracks are found, you may install          part 51.
                                                                (2) You must use this service information          approved the incorporation by reference
     Piper Kit 88578–001 Revision B, dated June
     23, 2016, on an uncracked bulkhead                      as applicable to do the actions required by           of a certain publication listed in this AD
     following the Modification instructions in              this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.           as of June 9, 2017.
     Part II of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No. 1289A,              (i) Piper Aircraft, Inc. Service Bulletin No.         We must receive comments on this
     dated October 26, 2016. Installation of Piper           1289A, dated October 26, 2016.                        AD by July 10, 2017.
     Kit 88578–001 Revision B, dated June 23,                   (ii) Reserved.
                                                                                                                   ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
     2016, on an uncracked bulkhead is                          (3) For Piper Aircraft, Inc. service
                                                             information identified in this AD, contact            any of the following methods:
     considered terminating action for the
     repetitive inspection requirement in                    Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Service, 2926             • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
     paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.                   Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960;               http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
                                                             telephone: (877) 879–0275; fax: none; email:          instructions for submitting comments.
     (h) Special Flight Permit                               customer.service@piper.com; Internet:                    • Mail: U.S. Department of
       A special flight permit is allowed for this           www.piper.com.                                        Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
     AD per 14 CFR 39.23 with limitations.                      (4) You may view this referenced service           Avenue SE., West Building Ground
     Permits are only allowed for the inspections            information at the FAA, Small Airplane
                                                                                                                   Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
     required by this AD and are not allowed if              Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
     cracks are discovered during any inspection             Missouri 64106. For information on the                20590–0001.
     following Part I of Piper Aircraft, Inc. SB No.         availability of this material at the FAA, call           • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
     1289A, dated October 26, 2016. Any cracks               816–329–4148.                                         address above between 9 a.m. and 5
     found during any inspection must be                        (5) You may view this service information          p.m., Monday through Friday, except
     repaired before further flight.                         that is incorporated by reference at the              Federal holidays.


VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:57 May 24, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00035   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM   25MYR1



Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:53:26
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:53:26
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis AD is effective June 29, 2017.
ContactGregory ``Keith'' Noles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 474-5606; email: [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 24030 
RIN Number2120-AA64
CFR AssociatedAir Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR