82_FR_24243 82 FR 24143 - Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation

82 FR 24143 - Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 100 (May 25, 2017)

Page Range24143-24144
FR Document2017-10709

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 in this investigation and has issued a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders prohibiting importation of infringing automated teller machines (``ATMs''), ATM modules, components thereof, and products containing the same.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 100 (Thursday, May 25, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 100 (Thursday, May 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24143-24144]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10709]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-972]


Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components 
Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Final Determination Finding 
a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and 
Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has found a violation of section 337 in this investigation 
and has issued a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders 
prohibiting importation of infringing automated teller machines 
(``ATMs''), ATM modules, components thereof, and products containing 
the same.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.

[[Page 24144]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on November 20, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Diebold 
Incorporated and Diebold Self-Service Systems (collectively, 
``Diebold''). 80 FR 72735-36 (Nov. 20, 2015). The complaint alleged 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain automated teller machines, ATM modules, components thereof, and 
products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain 
claims of six United States Patents: 7,121,461 (``the '461 patent''); 
7,249,761 (``the '761 patent''); 7,314,163 (``the '163 patent''); 
6,082,616 (``the '616 patent''); 7,229,010 (``the '010 patent''); and 
7,832,631 (``the '631 patent''). Id. The notice of investigation named 
as respondents Nautilus Hyosung Inc. of Seoul, Republic of Korea; 
Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. of Irving, Texas; and HS Global, Inc. of 
Brea, California (collectively, ``Nautilus''). Id. at 72736. The Office 
of Unfair Import Investigations was not named as a party. Id.
    The '461 patent, '761 patent, and '163 patent were previously 
terminated from the investigation. See Order No. 12 (Apr. 28, 2016), 
not reviewed, Notice (May 11, 2016); Order No. 21 (June 28, 2016), not 
reviewed, Notice (July 28, 2016). The presiding administrative law 
judge (``ALJ'') conducted an evidentiary hearing from August 29, 2016 
through September 1, 2016. On November 30, 2016, the ALJ issued the 
final Initial Determination (``final ID'' or ``ID''). The final ID 
found a violation of section 337 with respect to the '616 and '631 
patents, and no violation with respect to the '010 patent. ID at 207-
09. The ALJ recommended that a limited exclusion order and cease and 
desist orders issue against Nautilus.
    Diebold and Nautilus each filed petitions for review concerning 
certain findings with respect to the '616 and '631 patents. On December 
30, 2016, the parties submitted statements on the public interest. 
Diebold contends that the investigation does not raise any public 
interest concerns. Nautilus asserts that a Commission exclusion order 
should include a certification provision and that any Commission 
remedial orders be tailored to allow repair of existing Nautilus ATMs 
in the United States. In addition, the Commission received submissions 
from United States Representative James B. Renacci, United States 
Senator Sherrod Brown, and certain Nautilus customers.
    On January 30, 2017, the Commission determined to review and modify 
two claim constructions for the '616 patent. Notice at 2-3 (Jan. 30, 
2017). The Commission's reasoning in support of its claim construction 
determinations for the '616 patent was set forth more fully in the 
Commission Claim Construction Opinion, which also issued on January 30, 
2017. In view of the Commission's determination to review and modify 
the construction of these two claim limitations, the Commission also 
determined to review for the asserted claims of the '616 patent: (1) 
Infringement; (2) obviousness in view of Diebold's 1064i ATM; and (3) 
the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement. Id. at 3. The 
Commission solicited further briefing from the parties on these issues, 
and briefing from the parties and the public on remedy, the public 
interest, and bonding. Id. at 4. The Commission determined not to 
review the final ID's finding of a section 337 violation as to the '631 
patent. Id. at 2.
    On February 10, 2017, Diebold and Nautilus filed their opening 
submissions on the issues under review and on remedy, the public 
interest, and bonding. On February 17, 2017, Diebold and Nautilus filed 
responses to each other's opening submission. Nautilus also submitted 
letters to the Commission concerning the public interest from 
Nautilus's customers.
    Having reviewed the record of investigation, the Commission has 
determined that there is a violation of section 337 by reason of the 
infringement of claims 1, 6, 10, 16, 26, and 27 of the '616 patent and 
claims 1-7 and 18-20 of the '631 patent. The Commission has further 
determined that the technical prong of the domestic industry 
requirement has been met as to the '616 patent. To the extent that 
Nautilus's arguments concerning obviousness of the asserted claims of 
the '616 patent in view of the Diebold 1064i ATM have not been waived, 
the Commission finds that Nautilus has failed to meet its burden to 
show invalidity by clear and convincing evidence.
    The Commission has further determined that the appropriate remedy 
is (1) a limited exclusion order prohibiting the entry of infringing 
automated teller machines, ATM modules, components thereof, and 
products containing the same, and (2) cease and desist orders directed 
to the respondents. The Commission has determined that the public 
interest factors enumerated in section 337(d) and (f), 19 U.S.C. 
1337(d), (f), do not preclude the issuance of the limited exclusion 
order or the cease and desist orders. The Commission has determined 
that a bond in the amount of 100 percent of the entered value of the 
subject articles is required during the period of Presidential review. 
19 U.S.C. 1337(j)(3). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders permit Nautilus to import replacement 
parts for its customers who need such parts to repair automated teller 
machines that have been imported prior to the date of the orders. 
Commissioner Kieff has provided additional views dissenting from the 
Commission's exception from the remedial orders regarding replacement 
parts for service or repair. The orders do not permit Nautilus to 
import infringing ATMs (as opposed to replacement parts) for any 
purpose, including repair or replacement.
    The investigation is terminated. The Commission's reasoning in 
support of its determinations is set forth more fully in its opinion. 
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President and 
the United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 19, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-10709 Filed 5-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                   Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 100 / Thursday, May 25, 2017 / Notices                                                  24143

     article descriptions in Category VI                     web portal will not allow a person who                the U.S. Department of Agriculture and
     petitions, including the constituent                    has formally submitted a comment                      CBP for use in providing information for
     materials in the intended merchandise                   during this filing period to amend that               that report; or (4) U.S. government
     or similar information that would help                  comment. Instead, that person must                    employees and contract personnel,
     verify the classification of the goods in               withdraw the original comment and file                solely for cybersecurity purposes,
     chapters 1–97 of the HTS. Similarly, the                a new comment that incorporates the                   subject to the requirement that all
     Commission seeks information that                       changes. The new comment must be                      contract personnel will sign appropriate
     could clarify technical criteria,                       filed before 5:15 p.m. EST on June 21,                nondisclosure agreements.
     distinguish the intended merchandise in                 2017. Comments may not be withdrawn                     By order of the Commission.
     a petition from other goods in the same                 or amended after that time.
                                                                                                                     Issued: May 19, 2017.
     rate line, or narrow the scope of an                       Comments containing confidential
                                                             business information. The portal will                 Lisa R. Barton,
     article description to avoid covering
     domestically produced goods.                            permit persons submitting comments to                 Secretary of the Commission.
                                                             claim that certain information should be              [FR Doc. 2017–10667 Filed 5–24–17; 8:45 am]
     Procedures for Filing a Comment                         treated either as confidential business               BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
        Who may file. Comments may be filed                  information or as information protected
     by any member of the public, including                  from disclosure under the Privacy Act
     the firm or its representative who filed                (e.g., a home address). However,                      INTERNATIONAL TRADE
     the petition. However, the Commission                   because of the portal’s design, the portal            COMMISSION
     will consider only comments that relate                 instructs that such information not be                [Investigation No. 337–TA–972]
     to petitions listed under category VI in                included in attachments to comments.
     the Commission’s preliminary report                     Persons who include confidential                      Certain Automated Teller Machines,
     submitted to the Committees on June 9,                  business information and information                  ATM Modules, Components Thereof,
     2017. The Commission will not consider                  protected under the Privacy Act in                    and Products Containing the Same;
     comments that relate to petitions listed                attachments to their comments will be                 Final Determination Finding a Violation
     under categories I, II, III, IV, and V in               presumed to have waived any privilege                 of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited
     the preliminary report.                                 and the information will be disclosed to              Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist
        Method for filing. Comments may                      the public when the comments and                      Orders; Termination of the
     only be filed electronically via the                    attachments are posted on the                         Investigation
     Commission’s designated secure MTBPS                    Commission’s Web site. See further
     web portal and in the format designated                 information below on possible                         AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
     by the Commission in that portal. The                   disclosure of confidential business                   Commission.
     portal may be accessed through the                      information.                                          ACTION: Notice.
     Commission’s Web site at https://                          Confidential Business Information:
     usitc.gov under ‘‘Miscellaneous Tariff                  The Commission will not release                       SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that
     Bill Information.’’ The portal contains a               information which the Commission                      the U.S. International Trade
     series of prompts and links that will                   considers to be confidential business                 Commission has found a violation of
     assist persons in providing the required                information within the meaning of                     section 337 in this investigation and has
     information. The Commission will not                    § 201.6(a) of its Rules of Practice and               issued a limited exclusion order and
     accept or consider comments submitted                   Procedure (19 CFR 201.6) unless the                   cease and desist orders prohibiting
     in paper or in any other form or format.                party submitting the confidential                     importation of infringing automated
     Comments must contain all information                   business information had notice, at the               teller machines (‘‘ATMs’’), ATM
     required in the portal in order to be                   time of submission, that such                         modules, components thereof, and
     considered properly filed. Comments,                    information would be released by the                  products containing the same.
     including any attachments thereto, must                 Commission, or such party subsequently                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
     otherwise comply with the                               consents to the release of the                        Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
     Commission’s rules and Handbook on                      information.                                          General Counsel, U.S. International
     MTB Filing Procedures. Persons seeking                     Confidential business information                  Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
     to comment on more than one petition                    submitted to the Commission in                        Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
     must submit a separate comment for                      comments may be disclosed to and/or                   708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
     each petition.                                          used by (1) the Commission in                         documents filed in connection with this
        Persons filing comments should be                    calculating the estimated revenue loss                investigation are or will be available for
     aware that they must be prepared to                     required under the Act, which may be                  inspection during official business
     complete their entire comment when                      based in whole or in part on the                      hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
     they enter the portal. The portal will not              estimated values of imports submitted                 Office of the Secretary, U.S.
     allow them to edit, amend, or complete                  in comments (as well as by petitioners                International Trade Commission, 500 E
     the comment at a later time.                            in their petitions); (2) the Commission,              Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
     Accordingly, they will need to complete                 its employees, and contract personnel                 telephone 202–205–2000. General
     their comment at the time they enter the                (a) in processing petitions and                       information concerning the Commission
     portal.                                                 comments and preparing reports under                  may also be obtained by accessing its
        Time for filing. To be considered,                   the American Manufacturing                            Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
     comments must be filed no earlier than                  Competitiveness Act of 2016 or (b) in                 The public record for this investigation
     June 12, 2017 at 8:45 a.m. and no later                 internal investigations, audits, reviews,             may be viewed on the Commission’s
     than the close of business (5:15 p.m.                   and evaluations relating to the                       electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
     EST) on June 21, 2017. The Commission                   programs, personnel, and operations of                edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
     will not accept comments filed before or                the Commission including under 5                      persons are advised that information on
     after these times and dates.                            U.S.C. Appendix 3; (3) Commerce for                   this matter can be obtained by
        Amendment and withdrawal of                          use in preparing its report to the                    contacting the Commission’s TDD
     comments. The Commission’s secure                       Commission and the Committees, and                    terminal on 202–205–1810.


VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:04 May 24, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00049   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM   25MYN1


     24144                         Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 100 / Thursday, May 25, 2017 / Notices

     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:        The                      On January 30, 2017, the Commission                exclusion order or the cease and desist
     Commission instituted this investigation                determined to review and modify two                   orders. The Commission has determined
     on November 20, 2015, based on a                        claim constructions for the ’616 patent.              that a bond in the amount of 100
     complaint filed by Diebold Incorporated                 Notice at 2–3 (Jan. 30, 2017). The                    percent of the entered value of the
     and Diebold Self-Service Systems                        Commission’s reasoning in support of                  subject articles is required during the
     (collectively, ‘‘Diebold’’). 80 FR 72735–               its claim construction determinations                 period of Presidential review. 19 U.S.C.
     36 (Nov. 20, 2015). The complaint                       for the ’616 patent was set forth more                1337(j)(3). Notwithstanding the
     alleged violations of section 337 of the                fully in the Commission Claim                         foregoing, the exclusion order and cease
     Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19                      Construction Opinion, which also                      and desist orders permit Nautilus to
     U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the                issued on January 30, 2017. In view of                import replacement parts for its
     United States, the sale for importation,                the Commission’s determination to                     customers who need such parts to repair
     and the sale within the United States                   review and modify the construction of                 automated teller machines that have
     after importation of certain automated                  these two claim limitations, the                      been imported prior to the date of the
     teller machines, ATM modules,                           Commission also determined to review                  orders. Commissioner Kieff has
     components thereof, and products                        for the asserted claims of the ’616                   provided additional views dissenting
     containing the same by reason of                        patent: (1) Infringement; (2) obviousness             from the Commission’s exception from
     infringement of certain claims of six                   in view of Diebold’s 1064i ATM; and (3)               the remedial orders regarding
     United States Patents: 7,121,461 (‘‘the                 the technical prong of the domestic                   replacement parts for service or repair.
     ’461 patent’’); 7,249,761 (‘‘the ’761                   industry requirement. Id. at 3. The                   The orders do not permit Nautilus to
     patent’’); 7,314,163 (‘‘the ’163 patent’’);             Commission solicited further briefing                 import infringing ATMs (as opposed to
     6,082,616 (‘‘the ’616 patent’’); 7,229,010              from the parties on these issues, and                 replacement parts) for any purpose,
     (‘‘the ’010 patent’’); and 7,832,631 (‘‘the             briefing from the parties and the public              including repair or replacement.
     ’631 patent’’). Id. The notice of                       on remedy, the public interest, and                      The investigation is terminated. The
     investigation named as respondents                      bonding. Id. at 4. The Commission                     Commission’s reasoning in support of
     Nautilus Hyosung Inc. of Seoul,                         determined not to review the final ID’s               its determinations is set forth more fully
     Republic of Korea; Nautilus Hyosung                     finding of a section 337 violation as to              in its opinion. The Commission’s orders
     America Inc. of Irving, Texas; and HS                   the ’631 patent. Id. at 2.                            and opinion were delivered to the
     Global, Inc. of Brea, California                           On February 10, 2017, Diebold and                  President and the United States Trade
     (collectively, ‘‘Nautilus’’). Id. at 72736.             Nautilus filed their opening                          Representative on the day of their
     The Office of Unfair Import                             submissions on the issues under review                issuance.
     Investigations was not named as a party.                and on remedy, the public interest, and                  The authority for the Commission’s
     Id.                                                     bonding. On February 17, 2017, Diebold                determination is contained in section
        The ’461 patent, ’761 patent, and ’163               and Nautilus filed responses to each                  337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
     patent were previously terminated from                  other’s opening submission. Nautilus                  amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
     the investigation. See Order No. 12                     also submitted letters to the                         210 of the Commission’s Rules of
     (Apr. 28, 2016), not reviewed, Notice                   Commission concerning the public                      Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
     (May 11, 2016); Order No. 21 (June 28,                  interest from Nautilus’s customers.                   210).
     2016), not reviewed, Notice (July 28,                      Having reviewed the record of
     2016). The presiding administrative law                 investigation, the Commission has                       By order of the Commission.
     judge (‘‘ALJ’’) conducted an evidentiary                determined that there is a violation of                 Issued: May 19, 2017.
     hearing from August 29, 2016 through                    section 337 by reason of the                          Lisa R. Barton,
     September 1, 2016. On November 30,                      infringement of claims 1, 6, 10, 16, 26,              Secretary to the Commission.
     2016, the ALJ issued the final Initial                  and 27 of the ’616 patent and claims 1–
                                                                                                                   [FR Doc. 2017–10709 Filed 5–24–17; 8:45 am]
     Determination (‘‘final ID’’ or ‘‘ID’’). The             7 and 18–20 of the ’631 patent. The
                                                                                                                   BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
     final ID found a violation of section 337               Commission has further determined that
     with respect to the ’616 and ’631                       the technical prong of the domestic
     patents, and no violation with respect to               industry requirement has been met as to               INTERNATIONAL TRADE
     the ’010 patent. ID at 207–09. The ALJ                  the ’616 patent. To the extent that                   COMMISSION
     recommended that a limited exclusion                    Nautilus’s arguments concerning
     order and cease and desist orders issue                 obviousness of the asserted claims of the             [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1063–1064 and
     against Nautilus.                                       ’616 patent in view of the Diebold 1064i              1066–1068 (Second Review)]
        Diebold and Nautilus each filed                      ATM have not been waived, the
     petitions for review concerning certain                 Commission finds that Nautilus has                    Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From
     findings with respect to the ’616 and                   failed to meet its burden to show                     Brazil, China, India, Thailand, and
     ’631 patents. On December 30, 2016, the                 invalidity by clear and convincing                    Vietnam; Determinations
     parties submitted statements on the                     evidence.                                               On the basis of the record 1 developed
     public interest. Diebold contends that                     The Commission has further                         in the subject five-year reviews, the
     the investigation does not raise any                    determined that the appropriate remedy                United States International Trade
     public interest concerns. Nautilus                      is (1) a limited exclusion order                      Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
     asserts that a Commission exclusion                     prohibiting the entry of infringing
                                                                                                                   determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
     order should include a certification                    automated teller machines, ATM
                                                                                                                   1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
     provision and that any Commission                       modules, components thereof, and
                                                                                                                   antidumping duty orders on frozen
     remedial orders be tailored to allow                    products containing the same, and (2)
                                                                                                                   warmwater shrimp from China, India,
     repair of existing Nautilus ATMs in the                 cease and desist orders directed to the
                                                                                                                   Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely
     United States. In addition, the                         respondents. The Commission has
                                                                                                                   to lead to continuation or recurrence of
     Commission received submissions from                    determined that the public interest
     United States Representative James B.                   factors enumerated in section 337(d)                    1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
     Renacci, United States Senator Sherrod                  and (f), 19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), do not               Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
     Brown, and certain Nautilus customers.                  preclude the issuance of the limited                  CFR 207.2(f)).



VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:04 May 24, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00050   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM   25MYN1



Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:52:38
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:52:38
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactSidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-708-2532. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810.
FR Citation82 FR 24143 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR