82 FR 25203 - Determination To Defer Sanctions; Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 104 (June 1, 2017)

Page Range		25203-25204
FR Document		2017-10942
The EPA is making an interim final determination to defer imposition of sanctions based on a proposed determination, published elsewhere in this Federal Register, that the State of Arizona (State) has submitted rules that satisfy the requirements of part D of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) permitting program for areas under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ).
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 104 (Thursday, June 1, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 104 (Thursday, June 1, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25203-25204]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10942]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 25203]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0255; FRL-9963-07-Region 9]


Determination To Defer Sanctions; Arizona Department of 
Environmental Quality

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Interim final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is making an interim final determination to defer 
imposition of sanctions based on a proposed determination, published 
elsewhere in this Federal Register, that the State of Arizona (State) 
has submitted rules that satisfy the requirements of part D of the 
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) permitting program for areas under the 
jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ).

DATES: This interim final determination is effective on June 1, 2017. 
However, comments will be accepted until July 3, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-
2017-0255, at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full 
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Beckham, EPA Region 9, (415) 972-
3811, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,'' 
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. EPA Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On November 2, 2015 (80 FR 67319), the EPA issued a final limited 
approval and limited disapproval action for revisions to the ADEQ 
portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP) that had been 
submitted by ADEQ to the EPA for approval (the 2015 NSR action).\1\ The 
2015 NSR action addressed ADEQ's permitting program for the issuance of 
New Source Review (NSR) permits for stationary sources, including 
review and permitting of major and minor sources under the Act. In our 
2015 NSR action, we determined that while ADEQ's SIP revision submittal 
strengthened the Arizona SIP, the submittal did not fully meet the 
requirements for NSR permitting programs under the CAA. Our 2015 NSR 
action included a final limited disapproval action under title I, part 
D of the Act, relating to requirements for nonattainment areas. 
Pursuant to section 179 of the CAA and our regulations at 40 CFR 52.31, 
this limited disapproval action under title I, part D started a 
sanctions clock for imposition of offset sanctions 18 months after the 
action's effective date of December 2, 2015, and highway sanctions 6 
months later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We also finalized other actions, which included a partial 
disapproval related to the PM2.5 significant monitoring 
concentration, and limited approvals, without corresponding limited 
disapprovals, related to section 189(e) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 21, 2017, ADEQ revised its NSR permitting program rules 
and on April 28, 2017, ADEQ submitted a number of revised NSR 
permitting rules to the EPA for approval into the Arizona SIP (April 
2017 NSR submittal), including rules intended to address the limited 
disapproval issues under title I, part D that we identified in our 2015 
NSR action. In the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we 
have proposed approval of ADEQ's April 2017 NSR submittal. Based on the 
proposed approval action, we are also taking this final rulemaking 
action, effective on publication, to defer imposition of the offset 
sanctions and highway sanctions that were triggered by our 2015 NSR 
action's limited disapproval of ADEQ's NSR permitting program, because 
we believe that ADEQ's April 2017 NSR submittal corrects the 
deficiencies that triggered such sanctions.
    EPA is providing the public with an opportunity to comment on this 
deferral of sanctions. If comments are submitted that change our 
assessment described in this final determination and the proposed full 
approval of ADEQ's April 2017 NSR submittal with respect to the title 
I, part D deficiencies identified as limited disapproval issues in our 
2015 NSR action, we would take final action proposing to lift this 
deferral of sanctions under 40 CFR 52.31. If no comments are submitted 
that change our assessment, then all sanctions and any sanction clocks 
triggered by our 2015 NSR action would be permanently terminated on the 
effective date of our final approval of ADEQ's April 2017 NSR 
submittal.

II. EPA Action

    We are making an interim final determination to defer CAA section 
179 sanctions associated with our limited disapproval action on 
November 2, 2015 of ADEQ's NSR permitting program with respect to the 
requirements of part D of title I of the CAA. This determination is 
based on our concurrent proposal to fully approve ADEQ's April 2017 NSR 
submittal, which resolves the deficiencies that triggered sanctions 
under section 179 of the CAA.
    Because the EPA has preliminarily determined that ADEQ's April 2017 
NSR submittal addresses the

[[Page 25204]]

deficiencies under part D of title I of the CAA identified as limited 
disapproval issues in our 2015 NSR action, and is fully approvable, 
relief from sanctions should be provided as quickly as possible. 
Therefore, the EPA is invoking the good cause exception under the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in not providing an opportunity for 
comment before this action takes effect (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)). However, 
by this action, the EPA is providing the public with a chance to 
comment on the EPA's determination after the effective date, and the 
EPA will consider any comments received in determining whether to 
reverse such action.
    The EPA believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking before the 
effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary to the 
public interest. The EPA has reviewed the State's submittal and, 
through its proposed action, is indicating that it is more likely than 
not that the State has submitted a revision to the SIP that corrects 
deficiencies under part D of the Act that were the basis for the action 
that started the sanctions clocks. Therefore, it is not in the public 
interest to impose sanctions. The EPA believes that it is necessary to 
use the interim final rulemaking process to defer sanctions while the 
EPA completes its rulemaking process on the approvability of the 
State's submittal. Moreover, with respect to the effective date of this 
action, the EPA is invoking the good cause exception to the 30-day 
notice requirement of the APA because the purpose of this notice is to 
relieve a restriction (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action defers sanctions and imposes no additional 
requirements.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the PRA. This action defers sanctions and imposes no new requirements.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This 
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action 
defers sanctions and imposes no new requirements.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, 
local or tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175. This action defers sanctions and imposes no new 
requirements. In addition, this action does not apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. Thus, Executive Order 
13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks 
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect 
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in 
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This rule is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental 
health risk or safety risk.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order 
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an 
environmental health or safety standard. This action defers sanctions 
in accordance with CAA regulatory provisions and imposes no additional 
requirements.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule 
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of 
the United States. The CRA allows the issuing agency to make a rule 
effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the agency makes 
a good cause finding that notice and comment rulemaking procedures are 
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest (5 U.S.C. 
808(2)). The EPA has made a good cause finding for this rule as 
discussed in section II of this preamble, including the basis for that 
finding.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by July 31, 2017. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the EPA Administrator of this final rule does not 
affect the finality of this rule for the purpose of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements (see CAA section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, 
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide, 
Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 16, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2017-10942 Filed 5-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
25204 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

deficiencies under part D of title I of the entities. This action defers sanctions J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
CAA identified as limited disapproval and imposes no new requirements. Actions To Address Environmental
issues in our 2015 NSR action, and is Justice in Minority Populations and
fully approvable, relief from sanctions D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Low-Income Populations
should be provided as quickly as (UMRA)
possible. Therefore, the EPA is invoking The EPA believes that this action is
This action does not contain any
the good cause exception under the not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59
unfunded mandate as described in
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it
not providing an opportunity for not significantly or uniquely affect small does not establish an environmental
comment before this action takes effect governments. The action imposes no health or safety standard. This action
(5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)). However, by this enforceable duty on any state, local or defers sanctions in accordance with
action, the EPA is providing the public tribal governments or the private sector. CAA regulatory provisions and imposes
with a chance to comment on the EPA’s no additional requirements.
determination after the effective date, E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
and the EPA will consider any K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
comments received in determining This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial This action is subject to the CRA, and
whether to reverse such action. the EPA will submit a rule report to
The EPA believes that notice-and- direct effects on the states, on the
comment rulemaking before the relationship between the national each House of the Congress and to the
effective date of this action is government and the states, or on the Comptroller General of the United
impracticable and contrary to the public distribution of power and States. The CRA allows the issuing
interest. The EPA has reviewed the responsibilities among the various agency to make a rule effective sooner
State’s submittal and, through its levels of government. than otherwise provided by the CRA if
proposed action, is indicating that it is the agency makes a good cause finding
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation that notice and comment rulemaking
more likely than not that the State has and Coordination With Indian Tribal
submitted a revision to the SIP that procedures are impracticable,
Governments
corrects deficiencies under part D of the unnecessary or contrary to the public
Act that were the basis for the action This action does not have tribal interest (5 U.S.C. 808(2)). The EPA has
that started the sanctions clocks. implications as specified in Executive made a good cause finding for this rule
Therefore, it is not in the public interest Order 13175. This action defers as discussed in section II of this
to impose sanctions. The EPA believes sanctions and imposes no new preamble, including the basis for that
that it is necessary to use the interim requirements. In addition, this action finding.
final rulemaking process to defer does not apply on any Indian Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
sanctions while the EPA completes its reservation land or in any other area petitions for judicial review of this
rulemaking process on the approvability where the EPA or an Indian tribe has action must be filed in the United States
of the State’s submittal. Moreover, with demonstrated that a tribe has Court of Appeals for the appropriate
respect to the effective date of this jurisdiction. Thus, Executive Order
action, the EPA is invoking the good circuit by July 31, 2017. Filing a petition
13175 does not apply to this action. for reconsideration by the EPA
cause exception to the 30-day notice
requirement of the APA because the G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Administrator of this final rule does not
purpose of this notice is to relieve a Children From Environmental Health affect the finality of this rule for the
restriction (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)). Risks and Safety Risks purpose of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which petition
III. Statutory and Executive Order The EPA interprets Executive Order for judicial review may be filed, and
Reviews 13045 as applying only to those shall not postpone the effectiveness of
This action defers sanctions and regulatory actions that concern such rule or action. This action may not
imposes no additional requirements. environmental health or safety risks that be challenged later in proceedings to
the EPA has reason to believe may enforce its requirements (see CAA
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory disproportionately affect children, per
Planning and Review and Executive section 307(b)(2)).
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and action’’ in section 2–202 of the List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Regulatory Review Executive Order. This rule is not subject
This action is not a significant to Executive Order 13045 because it Environmental protection,
regulatory action and was therefore not does not concern an environmental Administrative practice and procedure,
submitted to the Office of Management health risk or safety risk. Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
and Budget (OMB) for review. Incorporation by reference,
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
This action does not impose an Distribution, or Use matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
information collection burden under the requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile
This rule is not subject to Executive
PRA. This action defers sanctions and organic compounds.
Order 13211, because it is not a
imposes no new requirements.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES

significant regulatory action under Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) Executive Order 12866. Dated: May 16, 2017.
I certify that this action will not have I. National Technology Transfer and Alexis Strauss,
a significant economic impact on a Advancement Act Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
substantial number of small entities
[FR Doc. 2017–10942 Filed 5–31–17; 8:45 am]
under the RFA. This action will not This rulemaking does not involve
impose any requirements on small technical standards. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:33 May 31, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM 01JNR1
Document Created: 2017-06-01 03:05:25
Document Modified: 2017-06-01 03:05:25
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Interim final rule.
Dates		This interim final determination is effective on June 1, 2017. However, comments will be accepted until July 3, 2017.
Contact		Lisa Beckham, EPA Region 9, (415) 972- 3811, [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 25203
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compounds