82_FR_27201 82 FR 27089 - Notice of the American Arbitration Association's Response to Public Comments Related to the Pending Request for Approval of an Alternative Arbitration Procedure

82 FR 27089 - Notice of the American Arbitration Association's Response to Public Comments Related to the Pending Request for Approval of an Alternative Arbitration Procedure

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 112 (June 13, 2017)

Page Range27089-27090
FR Document2017-12149

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation invited the American Arbitration Association to respond to the public comments submitted in response to its request for approval of an Alternative Arbitration Procedure under section 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and PBGC's default arbitration procedures. On March 23, 2016, PBGC published notice of the American Arbitration Association's request in the Federal Register to advise interested persons of the request and solicit their views on it. This notice provides the public with the American Arbitration Association's letter response and solicits public comment on the response.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 112 (Tuesday, June 13, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27089-27090]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION


Notice of the American Arbitration Association's Response to 
Public Comments Related to the Pending Request for Approval of an 
Alternative Arbitration Procedure

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of the American Arbitration Association's response to 
public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation invited the American 
Arbitration Association to respond to the public comments submitted in 
response to its request for approval of an Alternative Arbitration 
Procedure under section 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security 
Act of 1974 and PBGC's default arbitration procedures. On March 23, 
2016, PBGC published notice of the American Arbitration Association's 
request in the Federal Register to advise interested persons of the 
request and solicit their views on it. This notice provides the public 
with the American Arbitration Association's letter response and 
solicits public comment on the response.

[[Page 27090]]


DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 28, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the Web site instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: [email protected].
     Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory Affairs Group, Office of 
the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026.
Comments received, including personal information provided, will be 
posted to www.pbgc.gov. Copies of comments may also be obtained by 
writing to Disclosure Division, Office of the General Counsel, Pension 
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005-
4026 or calling 202-326-4040 during normal business hours. (TTY and TDD 
users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 
and ask to be connected to 202-326-4040.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Perlin, Assistant Chief Counsel 
([email protected]), 202-326-4020, ext. 6818, or Jon Chatalian, 
Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel ([email protected]), ext. 6757, 
Office of the Chief Counsel, Suite 340, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, 
DC 20005-4026; (TTY/TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll-
free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4020.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) administers title 
IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). 
Section 4221(a)(1) of ERISA requires ``any dispute'' between an 
employer and a multiemployer pension plan concerning a withdrawal 
liability determination to be ``resolved through arbitration.''
    In lieu of PBGC's default arbitration procedures, under 29 CFR 
4221.14, a withdrawal liability arbitration may be conducted in 
accordance with an alternative arbitration procedure approved by the 
PBGC in accordance with Sec.  [thinsp]4221.14(c). Under Sec.  
[thinsp]4221.14(c), the sponsor of an arbitration procedure may request 
PBGC approval of its procedures by submitting an application to the 
PBGC. The application must include: (1) A copy of the procedures for 
which approval is sought; (2) a description of the history, structure 
and membership of the organization that sponsors the procedures; and 
(3) a discussion of the reasons why, in the sponsoring organization's 
opinion, the procedures satisfy the criteria for approval set forth in 
this section. Under Sec.  4221.14(d), PBGC shall approve an application 
if it determines that the proposed procedures will be substantially 
fair to all parties involved in the arbitration of a withdrawal 
liability dispute and that the sponsoring organization is neutral and 
able to carry out its role under the procedures.
    On November 20, 2015, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) 
requested approval of an Alternative Arbitration Procedure under 
section 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and 
29 CFR 4221.14. On March 23, 2016, PBGC published notice of AAA's 
Request for Approval of Alternative Arbitration Procedure to advise 
interested persons of the request and solicit their views on it (81 FR 
15578). The comments that PBGC received in response to AAA's request 
are available for viewing at: http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/pg/other/guidance/multiemployer-notices.html or https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=PBGC-2016-0001-0001.
    PBGC provided AAA with an opportunity to respond to the comments 
submitted in response to AAA's request, as it deemed appropriate. On 
March 30, 2017, AAA responded to the comments; the response can be 
viewed at: http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/pg/other/guidance/multiemployer-notices.html.
    All interested persons are invited to submit written comments to 
AAA's March 30, 2017 letter.
    All comments will be made part of the administrative record.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
W. Thomas Reeder,
Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2017-12149 Filed 6-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-02-P



                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 13, 2017 / Notices                                                  27089

                                               II. Summary of Environmental                            occurs inside the LCF buildings, and no                impact (ADAMS Accession No.
                                               Assessment                                              activities involving land disturbance are              ML17153A269). The NRC also spoke
                                                  The licensee has identified three                    planned. Therefore, the NRC staff finds                with the Ohio SHPO and consulted by
                                               types of waste to be shipped: Solid                     that there would be no impacts to the                  letter dated April 13, 2017 (ADAMS
                                               radioactive, liquid radioactive, and solid              following resources areas: Land use,                   Accession No. ML17102B319). The
                                                                                                       geology and soils, water resources,                    Ohio SHPO responded by letter dated
                                               low level mixed waste (LLMW). The
                                                                                                       ecology, meteorology, climate, air                     May 8, 2017, stating that a finding of No
                                               licensee states that approximately 315
                                                                                                       quality, noise, visual and scenic                      Adverse Effect for the proposed action
                                               waste shipments to NNSS will be
                                                                                                       resources, and socioeconomic resources.                is appropriate (ADAMS Accession No.
                                               necessary, and anticipates that these                      The NRC staff evaluated the
                                               shipments will be completed in                                                                                 ML17144A176).
                                                                                                       radiological impacts to workers and the
                                               calendar year 2018.                                     public. The staff found that the                       III. Finding of No Significant Impact
                                                  The ACO estimates that                               projected radiological doses to workers                  In accordance with the requirements
                                               approximately 180,000 cubic feet (5,097                 would be below the dose limits                         in 10 CFR part 51, the NRC staff has
                                               cubic meters) of Class A solid                          specified in 10 CFR 20.1201,                           concluded that the proposed action will
                                               radioactive waste would need to be                      ‘‘Occupational dose limits to adults,’’                not significantly affect the quality of the
                                               shipped to NNSS. This waste would be                    and that radiological doses to the public              human environment. Therefore, the staff
                                               packaged in Intermodal Freight                          would be indistinguishable when                        has determined, pursuant to 10 CFR
                                               Transport and B–25 box containers for                   compared to background radiation.                      51.31, that preparation of an
                                               shipment. The B–25 box containers are                      The proposed shipments would be                     environmental impact statement is not
                                               nominally 4 x 4 x 6 feet steel containers               made using authorized commercial                       required for the proposed action, and
                                               with a bolted lid. The licensee also                    carriers that would travel primarily on                that a finding of no significant impact is
                                               plans to ship liquid radioactive waste                  state highways using well-established                  appropriate.
                                               consisting of oils removed from LCF                     routes to the final burial site at NNSS.
                                               process equipment during disassembly.                                                                            Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
                                                                                                       The NRC determined that the relatively                 of June 2017.
                                               Solid LLMW, consisting of various                       small total number of shipments spread
                                               electronic components from the LCF,                                                                              For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
                                                                                                       over an extended period of time, along
                                               would be packaged into B–25 box                         with the limited duration of the                       Craig G. Erlanger,
                                               containers for disposal. This solid                     shipping process, would not                            Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety,
                                               LLMW would first be further processed                   significantly affect traffic flow.                     Safeguards, and Environmental Review,
                                               at the EnergySolutions facility in Oak                     The NRC staff also evaluated the                    Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
                                               Ridge, Tennessee, to substantially                                                                             Safeguards.
                                                                                                       cumulative impacts by identifying past,
                                               reduce surface exposure to leaching                                                                            [FR Doc. 2017–12139 Filed 6–12–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                       present, and reasonably foreseeable
                                               media, before being shipped to NNSS                     future actions at DOE’s Piketon, Ohio,                 BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
                                               for disposal.                                           site, and the incremental impacts of
                                                  ACO also would transfer unclassified,                ACO’s proposed action. The staff
                                               low-level contaminated liquid waste to                  determined that the proposed action                    PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
                                               a facility on DOE’s Piketon, Ohio, site                 would not significantly contribute to                  CORPORATION
                                               for further processing. This unclassified               cumulative impacts. The staff also
                                               waste would not be shipped to NNSS.                     determined that the proposed action                    Notice of the American Arbitration
                                               The Need for the Proposed Action                        would not affect federally-listed                      Association’s Response to Public
                                                                                                       endangered or threatened species or                    Comments Related to the Pending
                                                  By letter dated March 2, 2016, the                   their critical habitats.                               Request for Approval of an Alternative
                                               licensee notified the NRC of its decision                                                                      Arbitration Procedure
                                               to permanently cease LCF operations                     Environmental Impacts of the No-Action
                                               (ADAMS Accession No. ML16074A405).                      Alternative                                            AGENCY:  Pension Benefit Guaranty
                                               In preparation for future                                  As an alternative to the proposed                   Corporation.
                                               decommissioning of the LCF, ACO is                      action, the staff considered denial of the             ACTION: Notice of the American
                                               packaging its classified matter and                     proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’               Arbitration Association’s response to
                                               waste for transport to the NNSS for                     alternative). Under the no-action                      public comments.
                                               permanent burial.                                       alternative, all waste generated by LCF
                                                                                                       operations to date would remain onsite.                SUMMARY:  The Pension Benefit Guaranty
                                               Environmental Impacts of the Proposed                                                                          Corporation invited the American
                                               Action                                                  The no-action alternative does not
                                                                                                       comply with commitments made during                    Arbitration Association to respond to
                                                  The NRC staff evaluated the potential                licensing or the decommissioning                       the public comments submitted in
                                               environmental impacts associated with                   requirements of 10 CFR 70.38.                          response to its request for approval of an
                                               the proposed action, and has performed                  Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that                Alternative Arbitration Procedure under
                                               its environmental review in accordance                  leaving all of the LCF the waste onsite                section 4221 of the Employee
                                               with the requirements in 10 CFR part 51                 is not a reasonable alternative to                     Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
                                               and associated staff guidance. As                       approving the proposed action.                         and PBGC’s default arbitration
                                               detailed in the EA, the staff in preparing                                                                     procedures. On March 23, 2016, PBGC
                                               the EA reviewed relevant information                    Agencies and Persons Consulted                         published notice of the American
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES




                                               submitted by the licensee, consulted                      On May 24, 2017 (ADAMS Accession                     Arbitration Association’s request in the
                                               with the Ohio State Historic                            No. ML17111A766), the NRC consulted                    Federal Register to advise interested
                                               Preservation Office (Ohio SHPO), and                    with Ohio Department of Health                         persons of the request and solicit their
                                               received input from the Ohio                            regarding the environmental impacts of                 views on it. This notice provides the
                                               Department of Health.                                   the proposed action. The state official                public with the American Arbitration
                                                  Packaging and preparation of                         concurred with the environmental                       Association’s letter response and solicits
                                               classified matter and waste for shipping                assessment and finding of no significant               public comment on the response.


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:58 Jun 12, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00054   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM   13JNN1


                                               27090                          Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 13, 2017 / Notices

                                               DATES:  Comments must be received on                    discussion of the reasons why, in the                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
                                               or before July 28, 2017.                                sponsoring organization’s opinion, the                 COMMISSION
                                               ADDRESSES: Comments may be                              procedures satisfy the criteria for
                                                                                                                                                              [Release No. 34–80879; File No. SR–FICC–
                                               submitted by any of the following                       approval set forth in this section. Under
                                                                                                                                                              2017–010]
                                               methods:                                                § 4221.14(d), PBGC shall approve an
                                                  • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://                application if it determines that the                  Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
                                               www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web                     proposed procedures will be                            Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of
                                               site instructions for submitting                        substantially fair to all parties involved             Designation of Longer Period for
                                               comments.                                               in the arbitration of a withdrawal                     Commission Action on a Proposed
                                                  • Email: reg.comments@pbgc.gov.                      liability dispute and that the sponsoring              Rule Change To Amend the Mortgage-
                                                  • Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory                  organization is neutral and able to carry              Backed Securities Division Rules
                                               Affairs Group, Office of the General                    out its role under the procedures.                     Concerning Use of Clearing Fund for
                                               Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty                                                                              Losses, Liabilities or Temporary Needs
                                               Corporation, 1200 K Street NW.,                            On November 20, 2015, the American
                                                                                                       Arbitration Association (AAA)                          for Funds Incident to the Clearance
                                               Washington, DC 20005–4026.                                                                                     and Settlement Business and Make
                                               Comments received, including personal                   requested approval of an Alternative
                                                                                                                                                              Other Related Changes
                                               information provided, will be posted to                 Arbitration Procedure under section
                                               www.pbgc.gov. Copies of comments may                    4221 of the Employee Retirement                        June 7, 2017.
                                               also be obtained by writing to                          Income Security Act of 1974 and 29 CFR                    On April 11, 2017, Fixed Income
                                               Disclosure Division, Office of the                      4221.14. On March 23, 2016, PBGC                       Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
                                               General Counsel, Pension Benefit                        published notice of AAA’s Request for                  with the Securities and Exchange
                                               Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street                     Approval of Alternative Arbitration                    Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
                                               NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026 or                       Procedure to advise interested persons                 rule change SR–FICC–2017–010
                                               calling 202–326–4040 during normal                      of the request and solicit their views on              pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
                                               business hours. (TTY and TDD users                      it (81 FR 15578). The comments that                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                                               may call the Federal relay service toll-                PBGC received in response to AAA’s                     (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder.2
                                               free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be                    request are available for viewing at:                  The proposed rule change was
                                               connected to 202–326–4040.)                             http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/pg/other/                     published for comment in the Federal
                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        guidance/multiemployer-notices.html or                 Register on April 28, 2017.3 The
                                               Bruce Perlin, Assistant Chief Counsel                   https://www.regulations.gov/                           Commission did not receive any
                                               (Perlin.Bruce@PBGC.gov), 202–326–                       document?D=PBGC-2016-0001-0001.                        comments on the proposed rule change.
                                               4020, ext. 6818, or Jon Chatalian,                                                                                Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
                                               Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel                             PBGC provided AAA with an                           that within 45 days of the publication of
                                               (Chatalian.Jon@PBGC.gov), ext. 6757,                    opportunity to respond to the comments                 notice of the filing of a proposed rule
                                               Office of the Chief Counsel, Suite 340,                 submitted in response to AAA’s request,                change, or within such longer period up
                                               1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC                       as it deemed appropriate. On March 30,                 to 90 days as the Commission may
                                               20005–4026; (TTY/TDD users may call                     2017, AAA responded to the comments;                   designate if it finds such longer period
                                               the Federal relay service toll-free at 1–               the response can be viewed at: http://                 to be appropriate and publishes its
                                               800–877–8339 and ask to be connected                    www.pbgc.gov/prac/pg/other/guidance/                   reasons for so finding or as to which the
                                               to 202–326–4020.)                                       multiemployer-notices.html.                            self-regulatory organization consents,
                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                 All interested persons are invited to               the Commission shall either approve the
                                                                                                       submit written comments to AAA’s                       proposed rule change, disapprove the
                                               Background                                                                                                     proposed rule change, or institute
                                                                                                       March 30, 2017 letter.
                                                  The Pension Benefit Guaranty                                                                                proceedings to determine whether the
                                                                                                          All comments will be made part of the               proposed rule change should be
                                               Corporation (PBGC) administers title IV
                                               of the Employee Retirement Income                       administrative record.                                 disapproved. The 45th day after
                                               Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Section                     Issued in Washington, DC.                            publication of the notice for this
                                               4221(a)(1) of ERISA requires ‘‘any                      W. Thomas Reeder,                                      proposed rule change is June 12, 2017.
                                               dispute’’ between an employer and a                     Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
                                                                                                                                                                 The Commission is extending the 45-
                                               multiemployer pension plan concerning                   Corporation.                                           day time period for Commission action
                                               a withdrawal liability determination to                                                                        on the proposed rule change. The
                                                                                                       [FR Doc. 2017–12149 Filed 6–12–17; 8:45 am]
                                               be ‘‘resolved through arbitration.’’                                                                           Commission finds that it is appropriate
                                                                                                       BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
                                                  In lieu of PBGC’s default arbitration                                                                       to designate a longer period within
                                               procedures, under 29 CFR 4221.14, a                                                                            which to take action on the proposed
                                               withdrawal liability arbitration may be                                                                        rule change so that it has sufficient time
                                               conducted in accordance with an                                                                                to consider and take action on the
                                               alternative arbitration procedure                                                                              proposed rule change.
                                               approved by the PBGC in accordance                                                                                Accordingly, pursuant to Section
                                               with § 4221.14(c). Under § 4221.14(c),                                                                         19(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Act 5 and for the
                                               the sponsor of an arbitration procedure                                                                        reasons stated above, the Commission
                                               may request PBGC approval of its                                                                               designates July 27, 2017 as the date by
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES




                                               procedures by submitting an application
                                                                                                                                                                1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
                                               to the PBGC. The application must
                                                                                                                                                                2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
                                               include: (1) A copy of the procedures for                                                                        3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80517
                                               which approval is sought; (2) a                                                                                (April 24, 2017), 82 FR 19771 (April 28, 2017) (SR–
                                               description of the history, structure and                                                                      FICC–2017–010).
                                               membership of the organization that                                                                              4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

                                               sponsors the procedures; and (3) a                                                                               5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).




                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:58 Jun 12, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00055   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM    13JNN1



Document Created: 2017-06-13 00:22:16
Document Modified: 2017-06-13 00:22:16
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of the American Arbitration Association's response to public comments.
DatesComments must be received on or before July 28, 2017.
ContactBruce Perlin, Assistant Chief Counsel (Perlin.Bruce[email protected]), 202-326-4020, ext. 6818, or Jon Chatalian, Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel ([email protected]), ext. 6757, Office of the Chief Counsel, Suite 340, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026; (TTY/TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll- free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4020.)
FR Citation82 FR 27089 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR