82 FR 27616 - Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, New Martinsville, WV

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 115 (June 16, 2017)

Page Range		27616-27618
FR Document		2017-12499

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local regulation for all navigable waters, surface to bottom, of the Ohio River miles 127.5 to 128.5. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near New Martinsville, WV during a high-speed boat race on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 115 (Friday, June 16, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 115 (Friday, June 16, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27616-27618]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0435]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, New Martinsville, WV

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local 
regulation for all navigable waters, surface to bottom, of the Ohio 
River miles 127.5 to 128.5. This action is necessary to provide for the 
safety of life on these navigable waters near New Martinsville, WV 
during a high-speed boat race on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017. This 
regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the regulated 
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a 
designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:45 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. on June 17, 
2017 and June 18, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0435 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Petty Officer Robert Miller, Marine Safety Unit 
Huntington, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 304-733-0198, email 
Robert.A.Miller2@uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On May 11, 2017, the New Martinsville Vintage Regatta notified the 
Coast Guard that it will be sponsoring a high-speed boat race from 8:45 
a.m. to 6:15 p.m. daily on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017 on the Ohio 
River miles 127.5 to 128.5 in the vicinity of New Martinsville, WV.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) (B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. We must 
establish this safety zone by June 17, 2017 and lack sufficient time to 
provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those comments 
before issuing the rule.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. This rule is necessary 
for the safety of life during the high-speed boat race on these 
navigable waters. It would be impracticable to delay this rule to 
provide a full 30 days notice because the event is scheduled, under 
contractual obligation and advertised to the local community to take 
place on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1233. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) has determined that 
potential hazards associated with the high-speed boat race to occur on 
June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017, present a safety concern for anyone 
within the regulated area. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure 
the safety of people and property within the regulated area before, 
during, and after the scheduled event.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary special local regulation from 
8:45 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017. The 
temporary special local regulation will cover all navigable waters, 
surface to bottom, from mile 127.5 to 128.5 on the Ohio River in the 
vicinity of New Martinsville, WV. The duration of the regulated area is 
intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters 
before,

[[Page 27617]]

during, and after the scheduled event. No vessel or person will be 
permitted to enter the temporary special local regulation without 
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and 13563 
(``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies to 
assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, 
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that 
maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental, 
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity. 
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both 
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of 
promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to reduce regulation 
and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new 
regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for 
elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently 
managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this 
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive 
Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is 
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's 
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the 
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs''' (February 2, 2017).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the regulated area. Vessel 
traffic will be able to safely navigate through the affected area 
before and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard will issue 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the 
regulated area and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter 
the area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on 
any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a temporary special local regulation lasting from 8:45 
a.m. to 6:15 p.m. daily on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017. It is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A Record of Environmental 
Consideration is available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the

[[Page 27618]]

person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 
coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received 
without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or 
vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and Recordkeeping 
Requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add temporary Sec.  100.35T08-0435 to read as follows:


 Sec.  100.35T08-0435   Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, New 
Martinsville, WV.

    (a) Location. All navigable waters of the Ohio River, surface to 
bottom, beginning at mile marker 127.5 and ending at mile marker 128.5 
at New Martinsville, WV.
    (b) Periods of enforcement. This rule will be enforced from 8:45 
a.m. to 6:15 p.m. daily on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  100.801 of this part, entry into this area is prohibited unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated 
representative.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the 
area must request permission from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley 
or a designated representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley may 
be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or at 1-800-253-7465.
    (d) Informational Broadcasts. The COTP Ohio Valley or a designated 
representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to 
mariners of the enforcement period for the special local regulation, as 
well as any changes in the dates and times of enforcement.

    Dated: June 12, 2017.
M.B. Zamperini,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2017-12499 Filed 6-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 115 / Friday, June 16, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 27617

during, and after the scheduled event. B. Impact on Small Entities effect on the States, on the relationship
No vessel or person will be permitted to The Regulatory Flexibility Act of between the national government and
enter the temporary special local 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, the States, or on the distribution of
regulation without obtaining permission requires Federal agencies to consider power and responsibilities among the
from the COTP or a designated the potential impact of regulations on various levels of government. We have
representative. small entities during rulemaking. The analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
V. Regulatory Analyses term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
with the fundamental federalism
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
We developed this rule after principles and preemption requirements
that are independently owned and
considering numerous statutes and described in Executive Order 13132.
operated and are not dominant in their Also, this rule does not have tribal
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. fields, and governmental jurisdictions
Below we summarize our analyses implications under Executive Order
with populations of less than 50,000. 13175, Consultation and Coordination
based on a number of these statutes and The Coast Guard received no comments
Executive Orders, and we discuss First with Indian Tribal Governments,
from the Small Business Administration because it does not have a substantial
Amendment rights of protestors. on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard direct effect on one or more Indian
A. Regulatory Planning and Review certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this tribes, on the relationship between the
rule will not have a significant Federal Government and Indian tribes,
E.O.s 12866 (‘‘Regulatory Planning economic impact on a substantial or on the distribution of power and
and Review’’) and 13563 (‘‘Improving number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’) While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you
direct agencies to assess the costs and vessels intending to transit the regulated believe this rule has implications for
benefits of available regulatory area may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
alternatives and, if regulation is reasons stated in section V.A. above, contact the person listed in the FOR
necessary, to select regulatory this rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
approaches that maximize net benefits economic impact on any vessel owner
including potential economic, or operator. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
environmental, public health and safety Under section 213(a) of the Small The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
effects, distributive impacts, and equity. Business Regulatory Enforcement of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– Federal agencies to assess the effects of
importance of quantifying both costs 121), we want to assist small entities in their discretionary regulatory actions. In
and benefits, of reducing costs, of understanding this rule. If the rule particular, the Act addresses actions
harmonizing rules, and of promoting would affect your small business, that may result in the expenditure by a
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 organization, or governmental State, local, or tribal government, in the
(‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling jurisdiction and you have questions aggregate, or by the private sector of
Regulatory Costs’’), directs agencies to concerning its provisions or options for $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
reduce regulation and control regulatory compliance, please contact the person more in any one year. Though this rule
costs and provides that ‘‘for every one listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION will not result in such expenditure, we
new regulation issued, at least two prior CONTACT section. do discuss the effects of this rule
regulations be identified for elimination, Small businesses may send comments elsewhere in this preamble.
and that the cost of planned regulations on the actions of Federal employees
be prudently managed and controlled who enforce, or otherwise determine F. Environment
through a budgeting process.’’ compliance with, Federal regulations to We have analyzed this rule under
The Office of Management and Budget the Small Business and Agriculture Department of Homeland Security
(OMB) has not designated this rule a Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Management Directive 023–01 and
significant regulatory action under and the Regional Small Business Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Regulatory Fairness Boards. The which guide the Coast Guard in
Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it. Ombudsman evaluates these actions complying with the National
annually and rates each agency’s Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
As this rule is not a significant
responsiveness to small business. If you U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
regulatory action, this rule is exempt
wish to comment on actions by determined that this action is one of a
from the requirements of Executive
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– category of actions that do not
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The individually or cumulatively have a
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Coast Guard will not retaliate against significant effect on the human
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
small entities that question or complain environment. This rule involves a
January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing
about this rule or any policy or action temporary special local regulation
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
of the Coast Guard. lasting from 8:45 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. daily
Costs’’’ (February 2, 2017).
on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017. It
This regulatory action determination C. Collection of Information
is categorically excluded from further
is based on the size, location, duration, This rule will not call for a new review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure
and time-of-day of the regulated area. collection of information under the 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
Vessel traffic will be able to safely Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Record of Environmental Consideration
navigate through the affected area before
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES

U.S.C. 3501–3520). is available in the docket where
and after the scheduled event. The Coast indicated under ADDRESSES.
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel Governments G. Protest Activities
16 about the regulated area and the rule A rule has implications for federalism The Coast Guard respects the First
allows vessels to seek permission to under Executive Order 13132, Amendment rights of protesters.
enter the area. Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Protesters are asked to contact the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:54 Jun 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM 16JNR1

Document Created: 2017-06-16 00:52:35
Document Modified: 2017-06-16 00:52:35

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 8:45 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. on June 17, 2017 and June 18, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Robert Miller, Marine Safety Unit Huntington, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 304-733-0198, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 27616
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways

82 FR 27616 - Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, New Martinsville, WV

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 115 (June 16, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard