82_FR_27806 82 FR 27691 - Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

82 FR 27691 - Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 115 (June 16, 2017)

Page Range27691-27692
FR Document2017-12524

On March 1, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar (SSB) from Brazil. The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016. The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Villares Metals S.A. (Villares). For the final results of this review, we continue to find that subject merchandise has not been sold at less than normal value.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 115 (Friday, June 16, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 115 (Friday, June 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27691-27692]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-351-825]


Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On March 1, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar (SSB) from Brazil. The 
period of review (POR) is February 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016. 
The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, 
Villares Metals S.A. (Villares). For the final results of this review, 
we continue to find that subject merchandise has not been sold at less 
than normal value.

DATES: Effective June 16, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3477, and (202) 482-
1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 1, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
of the administrative review in which it determined that subject 
merchandise has not been sold at less than fair value.\1\ The 
Department stated its intent to issue a supplemental questionnaire 
after the Preliminary Results in light of pre-preliminary comments from 
Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries LLC, Electralloy, 
a Division of G.O. Carlson, Inc., North America Stainless, and Valbruna 
Slater Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners).\2\ On March 10, 
2017, the Department issued a supplemental questionnaire to Villares 
regarding its reporting of certain expense and revenue items,\3\ and 
received a response on April 3, 2017.\4\ No party commented on 
Villares' April 3, 2017, supplemental questionnaire response. The 
Department also gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on 
the Preliminary Results, but received no comments. The Department 
conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 12197 
(March 1, 2017) (Preliminary Results) and Decision Memorandum for 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 
Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, dated February 23, 2017 
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
    \2\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2.
    \3\ See the Department's supplemental questionnaire, dated March 
10. 2017.
    \4\ See Villares' supplemental questionnaire response, dated 
April 3, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is SSB. The term SSB with 
respect to the order means articles of stainless steel in straight 
lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, 
cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a uniform 
solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles, 
segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles, 
hexagons, octagons or other convex polygons. SSB includes cold-finished 
SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced 
from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and 
reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other 
deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified 
above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-finished 
products, cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut-length rolled 
products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring 
at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness 
having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the 
thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in coils, of any uniform 
solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to 
the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes and 
sections. The SSB subject to the order is currently classifiable under 
subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    After consideration of Villares' April 3, 2017, supplemental 
questionnaire response, the Department made minor changes to its 
calculations announced in the Preliminary Results.\5\ Specifically, for 
the final results of this administrative review, we used Villares' 
revised sales databases that it submitted to the Department in response 
to a March 10, 2017, supplemental questionnaire, which we issued after 
the Preliminary Results.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For further details, see Memorandum to the File, 
``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless 
Steel Bar from Brazil: Final Analysis Memorandum for Villares Metals 
S.A.; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Final 
Analysis Memorandum).
    \6\ See the Department's supplemental questionnaire dated March 
10, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, in our March 10, 2017, supplemental questionnaire, we 
requested that Villares ensure and confirm that it reported gross unit 
prices net of any expenses and that any expenses (freight, insurance, 
merchandise processing fee, harbor maintenance fees, entry fee, etc.) 
were properly reported in their corresponding expense field.\7\ 
Villares provided the Department a U.S. sales database in Excel format 
with the appropriate expense fields. We reviewed the information 
provided by Villares and determined that the freight amounts reported 
constituted as freight revenue and therefore, consistent with the 
Department's practice, it is appropriate to treat freight revenue as 
offsets to certain expenses.\8\ Accordingly, for the final results, we 
capped Villares' freight

[[Page 27692]]

revenues in our calculation of U.S. price.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See the Department's March 10, 2017, third supplemental 
questionnaire at page 5.
    \8\ See Certain Orange Juice from Brazil: Final Results and 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 
46584 (August 11, 2008), and the accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum (I&D Memo) at Comment 7, and Polyethylene Retail Carrier 
Bags from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 6857 (February 11, 
2009), and the accompanying I&D Memo at Comment 6.
    \9\ For further details, see Memorandum to the File, 
``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless 
Steel Bar from Brazil: Final Analysis Memorandum for Villares Metals 
S.A.; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Administrative Review

    As a result of this review, we continue to find that a weighted-
average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for Villares for the 
period February 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016.

Assessment

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, 19 CFR 
351.212(b) and the Final Modification,\10\ the Department will instruct 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate all appropriate 
entries for Villares without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012) (Final Modification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by 
Villares for which it did not know that the merchandise was destined 
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed 
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue 
instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of 
this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of the administrative review 
for all shipments of SS Bar from Brazil entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate 
for Villares, will be 0.00 percent, the weighted average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for 
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in 
which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter 
is not a firm covered in this administrative review, a prior review, or 
the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; 
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters 
will continue to be 64.93 percent, the all-others rate established in 
the original less-than-fair-value investigation.\11\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, 59 FR 66914 (December 
28, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject 
to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: June 12, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-12524 Filed 6-15-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 115 / Friday, June 16, 2017 / Notices 27691 351.218 for the above-identified Sunset administrative review in which it thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed Review were established with determined that subject merchandise products in coils, of any uniform solid publication of the Initiation Notice on has not been sold at less than fair cross section along their whole length, June 2, 2017. Because of the value.1 The Department stated its intent which do not conform to the definition circumstances requiring this correction to issue a supplemental questionnaire of flat-rolled products), and angles, of the Intiation Notice, and pursuant to after the Preliminary Results in light of shapes and sections. The SSB subject to 19 CFR 351.302(b), the Department will pre-preliminary comments from the order is currently classifiable under consider requests from interested parties Carpenter Technology Corporation, subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, for the extension of the deadlines Crucible Industries LLC, Electralloy, a 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of established by 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) Division of G.O. Carlson, Inc., North the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the for filing of a notice of intent to America Stainless, and Valbruna Slater United States (HTSUS). Although the particpate, by 19 CFR 351.218(d)(2)(i) Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the HTSUS subheadings are provided for for filing of a statement of waiver, and petitioners).2 On March 10, 2017, the convenience and customs purposes, the by 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i) for filing of Department issued a supplemental written description of the scope of the a substantive response. questionnaire to Villares regarding its order is dispositive. This correction of the notice of reporting of certain expense and initiation is published in accordance revenue items,3 and received a response Changes Since the Preliminary Results with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 on April 3, 2017.4 No party commented After consideration of Villares’ April CFR 351.218(c). on Villares’ April 3, 2017, supplemental 3, 2017, supplemental questionnaire Dated: June 13, 2017. questionnaire response. The Department response, the Department made minor also gave interested parties an Gary Taverman, changes to its calculations announced in opportunity to comment on the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping the Preliminary Results.5 Specifically, Preliminary Results, but received no and Countervailing Duty Operations. for the final results of this comments. The Department conducted [FR Doc. 2017–12523 Filed 6–15–17; 8:45 am] administrative review, we used Villares’ this review in accordance with section BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P revised sales databases that it submitted 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as to the Department in response to a amended (the Act). March 10, 2017, supplemental DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Scope of the Order questionnaire, which we issued after the The merchandise subject to the order Preliminary Results.6 International Trade Administration is SSB. The term SSB with respect to the In addition, in our March 10, 2017, [A–351–825] order means articles of stainless steel in supplemental questionnaire, we straight lengths that have been either requested that Villares ensure and Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, confirm that it reported gross unit prices Results of Antidumping Duty cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, net of any expenses and that any Administrative Review; 2015–2016 or ground, having a uniform solid cross expenses (freight, insurance, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, section along their whole length in the merchandise processing fee, harbor International Trade Administration, shape of circles, segments of circles, maintenance fees, entry fee, etc.) were Department of Commerce. ovals, rectangles (including squares), properly reported in their corresponding SUMMARY: On March 1, 2017, the triangles, hexagons, octagons or other expense field.7 Villares provided the Department of Commerce (the convex polygons. SSB includes cold- Department a U.S. sales database in Department) published the preliminary finished SSBs that are turned or ground Excel format with the appropriate results of the administrative review of in straight lengths, whether produced expense fields. We reviewed the the antidumping duty order on stainless from hot-rolled bar or from straightened information provided by Villares and steel bar (SSB) from Brazil. The period and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars determined that the freight amounts that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or reported constituted as freight revenue of review (POR) is February 1, 2015, other deformations produced during the and therefore, consistent with the through January 31, 2016. The review rolling process. Except as specified Department’s practice, it is appropriate covers one producer/exporter of the above, the term does not include to treat freight revenue as offsets to subject merchandise, Villares Metals stainless steel semi-finished products, certain expenses.8 Accordingly, for the S.A. (Villares). For the final results of cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut- final results, we capped Villares’ freight this review, we continue to find that length rolled products which if less than subject merchandise has not been sold 4.75 mm in thickness have a width at less than normal value. 5 For further details, see Memorandum to the File, measuring at least 10 times the ‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty DATES: Effective June 16, 2017. thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in Order on Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil: Final FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: thickness having a width which exceeds Analysis Memorandum for Villares Metals S.A.; Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 2015–2016,’’ dated concurrently with this notice 150 mm and measures at least twice the (Final Analysis Memorandum). CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 6 See the Department’s supplemental and Compliance, International Trade 1 See Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil: Preliminary questionnaire dated March 10, 2017. Administration, U.S. Department of Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 7 See the Department’s March 10, 2017, third Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 12197 (March 1, 2017) supplemental questionnaire at page 5. (Preliminary Results) and Decision Memorandum NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 8 See Certain Orange Juice from Brazil: Final sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty (202) 482–3477, and (202) 482–1690, Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from Administrative Review, 73 FR 46584 (August 11, respectively. Brazil, dated February 23, 2017 (Preliminary 2008), and the accompanying Issues and Decision Decision Memorandum). Memorandum (I&D Memo) at Comment 7, and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2. Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from the People’s 3 See the Department’s supplemental Background Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping questionnaire, dated March 10. 2017. Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 6857 (February On March 1, 2017, the Department 4 See Villares’ supplemental questionnaire 11, 2009), and the accompanying I&D Memo at published the Preliminary Results of the response, dated April 3, 2017. Comment 6. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Jun 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1

27692 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 115 / Friday, June 16, 2017 / Notices revenues in our calculation of U.S. will be the rate established for the most ACTION: Notice of open meeting. price.9 recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of SUMMARY: The National Institute of Final Results of Administrative Review Standards and Technology (NIST) Smart subject merchandise; and (4) the cash As a result of this review, we continue deposit rate for all other manufacturers Grid Advisory Committee (SGAC or to find that a weighted-average dumping or exporters will continue to be 64.93 Committee) will meet in open session margin of 0.00 percent exists for Villares percent, the all-others rate established on Thursday, August 17, 2017 from 8:30 for the period February 1, 2015, through in the original less-than-fair-value a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time and January 31, 2016. investigation.11 These cash deposit Friday, August 18, 2017 from 8:30 a.m. requirements, when imposed, shall to 12:00 p.m. Eastern time. The primary Assessment purposes of this meeting are to provide remain in effect until further notice. In accordance with section updates on NIST Smart Grid activities 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, 19 CFR Notification to Importers and the intersections with Cyber- 351.212(b) and the Final Modification,10 This notice serves as a final reminder Physical Systems program activities, the Department will instruct U.S. to importers of their responsibility and to discuss the NIST Framework and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability liquidate all appropriate entries for certificate regarding the reimbursement Standards revision and the NIST Smart Villares without regard to antidumping of antidumping duties prior to Grid research program. The agenda may duties. liquidation of the relevant entries change to accommodate Committee For entries of subject merchandise during this review period. Failure to business. The final agenda will be during the POR produced by Villares for comply with this requirement could posted on the Smart Grid Web site at which it did not know that the result in the Secretary’s presumption http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid. merchandise was destined for the that reimbursement of antidumping DATES: The SGAC will meet on United States, we will instruct CBP to duties occurred and the subsequent Thursday, August 17, 2017 from 8:30 liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all- assessment of double antidumping a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time and others rate if there is no rate for the duties. Friday, August 18, 2017 from 8:30 a.m. intermediate company(ies) involved in to 12:00 p.m. Eastern time. the transaction. We intend to issue Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this Conference Room C103, Building 215 This notice also serves as a reminder review. (Advanced Measurement Laboratory), to parties subject to administrative National Institute of Standards and Cash Deposit Requirements protective order (APO) of their Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, responsibility concerning the The following cash deposit Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. Please destruction of proprietary information requirements will be effective upon note admittance instructions under the disclosed under APO in accordance publication of the notice of final results SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely of the administrative review for all this notice. written notification of the return or shipments of SS Bar from Brazil FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. destruction of APO materials or entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, conversion to judicial protective order is Cuong Nguyen, Smart Grid and Cyber- for consumption on or after the date of hereby requested. Failure to comply Physical Systems Program Office, publication as provided by section with the regulations and terms of an National Institute of Standards and 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash APO is a violation subject to sanction. Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail deposit rate for Villares, will be 0.00 Stop 8200, Gaithersburg, MD 20899– percent, the weighted average dumping Notification to Interested Parties 8200; telephone 301–975–2254, fax margin established in the final results of We are issuing and publishing these 301–948–5668; or via email at this administrative review; (2) for results in accordance with sections cuong.nguyen@nist.gov. merchandise exported by manufacturers 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The or exporters not covered in this Dated: June 12, 2017. Committee was established in administrative review but covered in a accordance with the Federal Advisory Ronald K. Lorentzen, prior segment of the proceeding, the Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement cash deposit rate will continue to be the and Compliance. App. The Committee is composed of company-specific rate published for the nine to fifteen members, appointed by [FR Doc. 2017–12524 Filed 6–15–17; 8:45 am] most recently completed segment of this the Director of NIST, who were selected BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P proceeding in which that manufacturer on the basis of established records of or exporter participated; (3) if the distinguished service in their exporter is not a firm covered in this DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE professional community and their administrative review, a prior review, or knowledge of issues affecting Smart the original investigation, but the National Institute of Standards and Grid deployment and operations. The manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Technology Committee advises the Director of NIST in carrying out duties authorized by 9 For further details, see Memorandum to the File, Smart Grid Advisory Committee section 1305 of the Energy ‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Meeting Independence and Security Act of 2007 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Order on Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil: Final Analysis Memorandum for Villares Metals S.A.; (Pub. L. 110–140). The Committee AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 2015–2016,’’ dated concurrently with this provides input to NIST on Smart Grid and Technology, Department of memorandum. standards, priorities, and gaps, on the 10 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of Commerce. overall direction, status, and health of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 11 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at the Smart Grid implementation by the Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from Smart Grid industry, and on Smart Grid (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). Brazil, 59 FR 66914 (December 28, 1994). Interoperability Panel activities, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Jun 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1


Document Created: 2017-06-16 00:51:55
Document Modified: 2017-06-16 00:51:55
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective June 16, 2017.
ContactHermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3477, and (202) 482- 1690, respectively.
FR Citation82 FR 27691 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR