82_FR_28223 82 FR 28106 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services

82 FR 28106 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 117 (June 20, 2017)

Page Range28106-28109
FR Document2017-12761

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 117 (Tuesday, June 20, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28106-28109]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12761]



[[Page 28106]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80920; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2017-64]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE 
Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services

June 14, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on June 1, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of 
Fees and Charges for Exchange Services (``Fee Schedule''). The proposed 
rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at 
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Cross-Asset Tier 2 and Cross-
Asset Tier 3 pricing in the Fee Schedule. Specifically, for Cross-Asset 
Tier 2, for securities with a per share price $1.00 or above, the 
Exchange proposes to: (1) Reduce the volume threshold requirement to be 
eligible for the tier, and (2) remove the alternate way to qualify for 
the Cross-Asset Tier 2 pricing. Further, for Cross-Asset Tier 3, for 
securities with a per share price $1.00 or above, the Exchange proposes 
to adopt an incremental credit. The Exchange proposes to implement the 
fee changes effective June 1, 2017.
Cross-Asset Tier 2
    Currently, Cross-Asset Tier 2 fees and credits apply to ETP Holders 
and Market Makers that provide liquidity an average daily volume share 
per month of 0.30% or more of the US Consolidated Average Daily Volume 
(``CADV''), and are affiliated with an OTP Holder or OTP Firm that 
provides an ADV of electronic posted executions for the account of a 
market maker in Penny Pilot issues on NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini 
options) of at least 0.75% of total Customer equity and ETF option ADV 
as reported by the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC''). ETP Holders, 
including Market Makers, can currently alternatively qualify for the 
Cross-Asset Tier 2 fees and credits if they provide liquidity an ADV 
share per month of 0.40% or more of the US CADV, and are affiliated 
with an OTP Holder or OTP Firm that provides an ADV of electronic 
posted executions for the account of a market maker in Penny Pilot 
issues on NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini options) of at least 0.65% 
of total Customer equity and ETF option ADV, as reported by OCC. Such 
ETP Holders and Market Makers currently receive a credit of $0.0031 per 
share for orders that provide liquidity to the order book in Tape A 
Securities; a credit of $0.0030 per share for providing liquidity to 
the order book and a fee of $0.0029 per share for taking liquidity from 
the order book in Tape B Securities; and a credit of $0.0032 per share 
for providing liquidity to the order book and a fee of $0.0030 per 
share for taking liquidity from the order book in Tape C Securities.
    The Exchange proposes to reduce the current 0.75% of total Customer 
equity and ETF option ADV requirement on NYSE Arca Options (excluding 
mini options) to 0.55% of total Customer equity and ETF option ADV 
requirement on NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini options). The Exchange 
also proposes to replace the words ``Penny Pilot'' with ``all'' within 
the text of current Cross Asset Tier 2 criteria. This proposed change 
to the rule would make the options volume requirement, in terms of 
which options issues are used for purposes of calculating the 
requirement, consistent with the requirements currently found in Cross-
Asset Tier 1 and Cross-Asset Tier 3. The Exchange is not proposing any 
change to the 0.30% or more of the US CADV requirement, or to the level 
of fees and credits currently applicable to Cross-Asset Tier 2.
    The Exchange also proposes to remove the current alternative method 
to qualify for the fees and credits for the Cross-Asset Tier 2 pricing 
as the alternative method has not had a meaningful effect of 
incentivizing order flow to the Exchange as originally designed. The 
Exchange notes that ETP Holders that previously qualified for fees and 
credits under the alternate method may achieve the same range of fees 
and credits by satisfying the revised threshold proposed to current 
Cross-Asset Tier 2.
Cross-Asset Tier 3
    Currently, the Exchange provides ETP Holders and Market Makers with 
a credit of $0.0030 per share for orders that provide liquidity to the 
order book in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C Securities if such ETP Holders 
and Market Makers (a) provide liquidity of 0.30% or more of the US CADV 
per month and (b) are affiliated with an OTP Holder or OTP Firm that 
provides an ADV of electronic posted Customer and Professional Customer 
executions in all issues on NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini options) 
of at least 0.80% of total Customer equity and ETF option ADV as 
reported by OCC, of which at least 0.20% of total Customer equity and 
ETF option ADV as reported by OCC is from Customer and Professional 
Customer executions in non-Penny Pilot issues on NYSE Arca Options.
    The Exchange proposes to adopt an incremental credit of $0.0004 per 
share for orders that provide liquidity to the order book in Tape C 
Securities that would be payable to ETP Holders and Market Makers who 
meet the requirements of Cross-Asset Tier 3 and execute providing 
volume in Tape C Securities during the billing month equal to at least 
0.35% of Tape C CADV. ETP Holders and Market Makers that qualify for 
the proposed incremental Tape C credit shall not qualify for any

[[Page 28107]]

fees or credits under Tape C Tier 1, Tape C Tier 2, and Tape C Tier 3.
    The proposed changes are not otherwise intended to address any 
other issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problems 
that market participants would have in complying with the proposed 
changes.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\5\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross-Asset Tier 2
    The Exchange believes the proposed amendments to Cross-Asset Tier 2 
are reasonable and equitably allocated because they would apply to ETP 
Holders and Market Makers equally and are designed to incentivize these 
market participants to send their orders to the Exchange and therefore 
provide liquidity that supports the quality of price discovery and 
promotes market transparency. The Exchange believes the Cross-Asset 
Tier 2 pricing tier is equitable because it is applicable to all 
similarly situated ETP Holders and Market Makers on an equal and non-
discriminatory basis and provides fees and credits that are reasonably 
related to the value of an exchange's market quality associated with 
higher volumes.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed revised threshold for 
qualifying for Cross-Asset Tier 2 is reasonable because it is designed 
to encourage increased trading activity on the NYSE Arca options 
market. The Exchange believes it is reasonable, equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory to require ETP Holders and Market Makers to 
meet the revised threshold to qualify for Cross-Asset Tier 2 because 
doing so would allow ETP Holders and Market Makers to more easily 
qualify for the fees and credits applicable to such participants.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed modification to eliminate 
the alternate method to qualify for Cross-Asset Tier 2 is reasonable, 
fair, and equitable because the alternate method was not providing the 
desired result of incentivizing ETP Holders and Market Makers to 
increase their participation on the NYSE Arca equity and option 
markets. Therefore, eliminating the alternative method will have a 
negligible effect on order flow and market behavior. The Exchange 
believes the proposed change is not unfairly discriminatory because it 
will apply equally to all participants. Further, as described above, 
the Exchange notes that ETP Holders and Market Makers that previously 
qualified for the fees and credits under the alternative method would 
achieve the same fees and credits by satisfying what the Exchange 
believes to be similar or lower criteria as the existing and revised 
Cross-Asset Tier 2 discussed above. Specifically, the proposed 0.55% of 
total Customer equity and ETF option ADV requirement in all issues on 
NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini options) is lower than the 0.65% of 
total Customer equity and ETF option ADV requirement in Penny Pilot 
issues on NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini options) under the 
alternative method that the Exchange is proposing to eliminate. 
Similarly, the current 0.30% or more of the US CADV requirement is 
lower than the 0.40% or more of the US CADV requirement for the 
alternative method that the Exchange is proposing to eliminate.
    The Exchange believes the proposed change to replace the words 
``Penny Pilot'' with ``all'' issues within the text of current Cross 
Asset Tier 2 is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. 
This proposed change to the rule would make the options volume 
requirement, in terms of which options issues are used for purposes of 
calculating the requirement, consistent with the requirements currently 
found in Cross-Asset Tier 1 and Cross-Asset Tier 3, and would therefore 
provide consistency and clarity to the Fee Schedule.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory because all ETP Holders would be subject to the 
same fee structure. Moreover, the Cross-Asset Tier 2 fees and credits 
are available for all ETP Holders to satisfy, except for those ETP 
Holders that are not affiliated with an NYSE Arca Options OTP Holder or 
OTP Firm. ETP Holders that are not affiliated with an NYSE Arca Options 
OTP Holder or OTP Firm are still eligible for fees and credits by means 
other than the Cross-Asset Tier. NASDAQ similarly charges certain fees 
based on both equity and options volume.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See NASDAQ Rule 7018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross-Asset Tier 3
    The Exchange believes that the proposed modification to add the 
additional Tape C credit of $0.0004 per share for ETP Holders and 
Market Makers that execute providing volume in Tape C Securities during 
the billing month equal to at least 0.35% of Tape C CADV is reasonable, 
fair, and equitable because the because it is designed to encourage 
increased trading activity in Tape C Securities. The Exchange notes 
that ETP Holders and Market Makers that do not execute providing volume 
of at least 0.35% of Tape C CADV in the billing month can still qualify 
for Cross-Asset Tier 3 if they meet the Cross-Asset Tier 3 
requirements.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed change is equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory because providing incentives for orders in 
exchange-listed securities that are executed on a registered national 
securities exchange (rather than relying on certain available off-
exchange execution methods) would contribute to investors' confidence 
in the fairness of their transactions and would benefit all investors 
by deepening the Exchange's liquidity pool, supporting the quality of 
price discovery, promoting market transparency and improving investor 
protection.
    The Exchange further believes the proposed incremental credit is 
reasonable and appropriate in that it is based on the amount of 
business transacted on the Exchange. The Exchange believes the proposed 
incremental credit for adding liquidity is also reasonable because it 
will encourage liquidity and competition in Tape C securities quoted 
and traded on the Exchange.
    The Exchange believes the proposed incremental credits are 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they are open to all 
ETP Holders and Market Makers on an equal basis and provide discounts 
that are reasonably related to the value to the Exchange's market 
quality associated with higher volumes. The Exchange further believes 
that the proposed incremental rebate is not unfairly discriminatory 
because the magnitude of the additional rebate is not unreasonably high 
in comparison to the rebate paid with respect to other displayed 
liquidity-providing orders. The Exchange does not believe that it is 
unfairly discriminatory to offer increased rebates to ETP Holders and 
Market Makers as these participants would be subject to additional 
volume requirements in Tape C Securities.

[[Page 28108]]

    The Exchange believes that prohibiting Cross-Asset Tier 3 ETP 
Holders and Market Makers from qualifying for the Tape C Tier 1, Tape C 
Tier 2, and Tape C Tier 3 tiers is reasonable, equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory because ETP Holders and Market Makers that 
qualify for Cross-Asset Tier 3 and execute providing volume in Tape C 
Securities during the billing month equal to at least 0.35% of Tape C 
CADV would already receive an incremental Tape C credit of $0.0004 
before the Tape C Tier 1, Tape C Tier 2, and Tape C Tier 3 tiers, which 
is as equal to or higher than the those credits associated with the 
Tape C tiers.
    Further, with regards to Cross-Asset pricing in general, the 
Exchange believes that the proposal is reasonable and would continue to 
directly relate to the activity of an ETP Holder and the activity of an 
affiliated OTP Holder or OTP Firm on NYSE Arca Options, thereby 
encouraging increased trading activity on both the NYSE Arca equity and 
option markets. In this regard, the proposal is designed to bring 
additional posted order flow to NYSE Arca Options, so as to provide 
additional opportunities for all OTP Holders and OTP Firms to trade on 
NYSE Arca Options.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\7\ the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
change would encourage the submission of additional liquidity to a 
public exchange, thereby promoting price discovery and transparency and 
enhancing order execution opportunities for ETP Holders and Market 
Makers. The Exchange believes that this could promote competition 
between the Exchange and other execution venues, including those that 
currently offer similar order types and comparable transaction pricing, 
by encouraging additional orders to be sent to the Exchange for 
execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the proposal to amend the requirements to qualify for 
Cross-Asset Tier 2 and Cross-Asset Tier 3 will not place an undue 
burden on competition because both tiers would remain available for all 
ETP Holders to satisfy, except those ETP Holders that are not 
affiliated with an NYSE Arca Options OTP Holder or OTP Firm. ETP 
Holders that are not affiliated with an NYSE Arca Options OTP Holder or 
OTP Firm are eligible for similar fees and credits by others means than 
the Cross-Asset pricing tiers.
    Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more 
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust 
its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges and 
with alternative trading systems that have been exempted from 
compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. 
Because competitors are free to modify their own fees and credits in 
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their 
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which 
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is 
extremely limited. As a result of all of these considerations, the 
Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impair the 
ability of ETP Holders or competing order execution venues to maintain 
their competitive standing in the financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \8\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \9\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \10\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-64 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-64. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from

[[Page 28109]]

submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEArca-2017-64 and should be submitted on or before July 11, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-12761 Filed 6-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                28106                          Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices

                                                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                      options) to 0.55% of total Customer
                                                COMMISSION                                              Statement of the Purpose of, and the                   equity and ETF option ADV
                                                                                                        Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                 requirement on NYSE Arca Options
                                                [Release No. 34–80920; File No. SR–                     Change                                                 (excluding mini options). The Exchange
                                                NYSEArca–2017–64]                                                                                              also proposes to replace the words
                                                                                                        1. Purpose
                                                                                                                                                               ‘‘Penny Pilot’’ with ‘‘all’’ within the text
                                                                                                           The Exchange proposes to amend the                  of current Cross Asset Tier 2 criteria.
                                                Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
                                                                                                        Cross-Asset Tier 2 and Cross-Asset Tier                This proposed change to the rule would
                                                Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
                                                                                                        3 pricing in the Fee Schedule.                         make the options volume requirement,
                                                Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed                     Specifically, for Cross-Asset Tier 2, for
                                                Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca                                                                             in terms of which options issues are
                                                                                                        securities with a per share price $1.00                used for purposes of calculating the
                                                Equities Schedule of Fees and                           or above, the Exchange proposes to: (1)                requirement, consistent with the
                                                Charges for Exchange Services                           Reduce the volume threshold                            requirements currently found in Cross-
                                                June 14, 2017.
                                                                                                        requirement to be eligible for the tier,               Asset Tier 1 and Cross-Asset Tier 3. The
                                                                                                        and (2) remove the alternate way to                    Exchange is not proposing any change
                                                   Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the                qualify for the Cross-Asset Tier 2                     to the 0.30% or more of the US CADV
                                                Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the                    pricing. Further, for Cross-Asset Tier 3,              requirement, or to the level of fees and
                                                ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3                  for securities with a per share price                  credits currently applicable to Cross-
                                                notice is hereby given that, on June 1,                 $1.00 or above, the Exchange proposes                  Asset Tier 2.
                                                2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’                 to adopt an incremental credit. The                       The Exchange also proposes to
                                                or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the                        Exchange proposes to implement the fee                 remove the current alternative method
                                                Securities and Exchange Commission                      changes effective June 1, 2017.                        to qualify for the fees and credits for the
                                                (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                  Cross-Asset Tier 2                                     Cross-Asset Tier 2 pricing as the
                                                change as described in Items I, II, and                                                                        alternative method has not had a
                                                                                                           Currently, Cross-Asset Tier 2 fees and              meaningful effect of incentivizing order
                                                III below, which Items have been
                                                                                                        credits apply to ETP Holders and                       flow to the Exchange as originally
                                                prepared by the self-regulatory
                                                                                                        Market Makers that provide liquidity an                designed. The Exchange notes that ETP
                                                organization. The Commission is                         average daily volume share per month
                                                publishing this notice to solicit                                                                              Holders that previously qualified for
                                                                                                        of 0.30% or more of the US                             fees and credits under the alternate
                                                comments on the proposed rule change                    Consolidated Average Daily Volume                      method may achieve the same range of
                                                from interested persons.                                (‘‘CADV’’), and are affiliated with an                 fees and credits by satisfying the revised
                                                I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                       OTP Holder or OTP Firm that provides                   threshold proposed to current Cross-
                                                Statement of the Terms of Substance of                  an ADV of electronic posted executions                 Asset Tier 2.
                                                the Proposed Rule Change                                for the account of a market maker in
                                                                                                        Penny Pilot issues on NYSE Arca                        Cross-Asset Tier 3
                                                   The Exchange proposes to amend the                   Options (excluding mini options) of at                    Currently, the Exchange provides ETP
                                                NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees                     least 0.75% of total Customer equity and               Holders and Market Makers with a
                                                and Charges for Exchange Services                       ETF option ADV as reported by the                      credit of $0.0030 per share for orders
                                                (‘‘Fee Schedule’’). The proposed rule                   Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’).                that provide liquidity to the order book
                                                change is available on the Exchange’s                   ETP Holders, including Market Makers,                  in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C Securities
                                                Web site at www.nyse.com, at the                        can currently alternatively qualify for                if such ETP Holders and Market Makers
                                                principal office of the Exchange, and at                the Cross-Asset Tier 2 fees and credits                (a) provide liquidity of 0.30% or more
                                                                                                        if they provide liquidity an ADV share                 of the US CADV per month and (b) are
                                                the Commission’s Public Reference
                                                                                                        per month of 0.40% or more of the US                   affiliated with an OTP Holder or OTP
                                                Room.
                                                                                                        CADV, and are affiliated with an OTP                   Firm that provides an ADV of electronic
                                                II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                      Holder or OTP Firm that provides an                    posted Customer and Professional
                                                Statement of the Purpose of, and                        ADV of electronic posted executions for                Customer executions in all issues on
                                                Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                  the account of a market maker in Penny                 NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini
                                                Change                                                  Pilot issues on NYSE Arca Options                      options) of at least 0.80% of total
                                                                                                        (excluding mini options) of at least                   Customer equity and ETF option ADV
                                                  In its filing with the Commission, the                0.65% of total Customer equity and ETF                 as reported by OCC, of which at least
                                                self-regulatory organization included                   option ADV, as reported by OCC. Such                   0.20% of total Customer equity and ETF
                                                statements concerning the purpose of,                   ETP Holders and Market Makers                          option ADV as reported by OCC is from
                                                and basis for, the proposed rule change                 currently receive a credit of $0.0031 per              Customer and Professional Customer
                                                and discussed any comments it received                  share for orders that provide liquidity to             executions in non-Penny Pilot issues on
                                                on the proposed rule change. The text                   the order book in Tape A Securities; a                 NYSE Arca Options.
                                                of those statements may be examined at                  credit of $0.0030 per share for providing                 The Exchange proposes to adopt an
                                                the places specified in Item IV below.                  liquidity to the order book and a fee of               incremental credit of $0.0004 per share
                                                The Exchange has prepared summaries,                    $0.0029 per share for taking liquidity                 for orders that provide liquidity to the
                                                set forth in sections A, B, and C below,                from the order book in Tape B                          order book in Tape C Securities that
                                                of the most significant parts of such                   Securities; and a credit of $0.0032 per                would be payable to ETP Holders and
                                                                                                                                                               Market Makers who meet the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                statements.                                             share for providing liquidity to the order
                                                                                                        book and a fee of $0.0030 per share for                requirements of Cross-Asset Tier 3 and
                                                                                                        taking liquidity from the order book in                execute providing volume in Tape C
                                                                                                        Tape C Securities.                                     Securities during the billing month
                                                                                                           The Exchange proposes to reduce the                 equal to at least 0.35% of Tape C CADV.
                                                  1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).                                 current 0.75% of total Customer equity                 ETP Holders and Market Makers that
                                                  2 15 U.S.C. 78a.                                      and ETF option ADV requirement on                      qualify for the proposed incremental
                                                  3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                   NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini                      Tape C credit shall not qualify for any


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:01 Jun 19, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00064   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM   20JNN1


                                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices                                           28107

                                                fees or credits under Tape C Tier 1,                       the NYSE Arca equity and option                        Cross-Asset Tier 3
                                                Tape C Tier 2, and Tape C Tier 3.                          markets. Therefore, eliminating the
                                                   The proposed changes are not                            alternative method will have a                            The Exchange believes that the
                                                otherwise intended to address any other                    negligible effect on order flow and                    proposed modification to add the
                                                issues, and the Exchange is not aware of                   market behavior. The Exchange believes                 additional Tape C credit of $0.0004 per
                                                any significant problems that market                       the proposed change is not unfairly                    share for ETP Holders and Market
                                                participants would have in complying                                                                              Makers that execute providing volume
                                                                                                           discriminatory because it will apply
                                                with the proposed changes.                                                                                        in Tape C Securities during the billing
                                                                                                           equally to all participants. Further, as
                                                                                                                                                                  month equal to at least 0.35% of Tape
                                                2. Statutory Basis                                         described above, the Exchange notes
                                                                                                                                                                  C CADV is reasonable, fair, and
                                                                                                           that ETP Holders and Market Makers
                                                   The Exchange believes that the                                                                                 equitable because the because it is
                                                                                                           that previously qualified for the fees and
                                                proposed rule change is consistent with                                                                           designed to encourage increased trading
                                                                                                           credits under the alternative method
                                                Section 6(b) of the Act,4 in general, and                                                                         activity in Tape C Securities. The
                                                                                                           would achieve the same fees and credits
                                                furthers the objectives of Sections                                                                               Exchange notes that ETP Holders and
                                                                                                           by satisfying what the Exchange
                                                6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,5 in particular,                                                                       Market Makers that do not execute
                                                                                                           believes to be similar or lower criteria
                                                because it provides for the equitable                                                                             providing volume of at least 0.35% of
                                                                                                           as the existing and revised Cross-Asset
                                                allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and                                                                          Tape C CADV in the billing month can
                                                                                                           Tier 2 discussed above. Specifically, the              still qualify for Cross-Asset Tier 3 if they
                                                other charges among its members,
                                                                                                           proposed 0.55% of total Customer                       meet the Cross-Asset Tier 3
                                                issuers and other persons using its
                                                                                                           equity and ETF option ADV                              requirements.
                                                facilities and does not unfairly
                                                                                                           requirement in all issues on NYSE Arca
                                                discriminate between customers,                                                                                      The Exchange believes that the
                                                                                                           Options (excluding mini options) is
                                                issuers, brokers or dealers.                                                                                      proposed change is equitable and not
                                                                                                           lower than the 0.65% of total Customer
                                                Cross-Asset Tier 2                                         equity and ETF option ADV                              unfairly discriminatory because
                                                                                                           requirement in Penny Pilot issues on                   providing incentives for orders in
                                                   The Exchange believes the proposed                                                                             exchange-listed securities that are
                                                amendments to Cross-Asset Tier 2 are                       NYSE Arca Options (excluding mini
                                                                                                           options) under the alternative method                  executed on a registered national
                                                reasonable and equitably allocated                                                                                securities exchange (rather than relying
                                                because they would apply to ETP                            that the Exchange is proposing to
                                                                                                                                                                  on certain available off-exchange
                                                Holders and Market Makers equally and                      eliminate. Similarly, the current 0.30%
                                                                                                                                                                  execution methods) would contribute to
                                                are designed to incentivize these market                   or more of the US CADV requirement is
                                                                                                                                                                  investors’ confidence in the fairness of
                                                participants to send their orders to the                   lower than the 0.40% or more of the US
                                                                                                                                                                  their transactions and would benefit all
                                                Exchange and therefore provide                             CADV requirement for the alternative
                                                                                                                                                                  investors by deepening the Exchange’s
                                                liquidity that supports the quality of                     method that the Exchange is proposing
                                                                                                                                                                  liquidity pool, supporting the quality of
                                                price discovery and promotes market                        to eliminate.
                                                                                                                                                                  price discovery, promoting market
                                                transparency. The Exchange believes the                       The Exchange believes the proposed                  transparency and improving investor
                                                Cross-Asset Tier 2 pricing tier is                         change to replace the words ‘‘Penny                    protection.
                                                equitable because it is applicable to all                  Pilot’’ with ‘‘all’’ issues within the text               The Exchange further believes the
                                                similarly situated ETP Holders and                         of current Cross Asset Tier 2 is                       proposed incremental credit is
                                                Market Makers on an equal and non-                         reasonable, equitable and not unfairly                 reasonable and appropriate in that it is
                                                discriminatory basis and provides fees                     discriminatory. This proposed change to                based on the amount of business
                                                and credits that are reasonably related to                 the rule would make the options volume                 transacted on the Exchange. The
                                                the value of an exchange’s market                          requirement, in terms of which options                 Exchange believes the proposed
                                                quality associated with higher volumes.                    issues are used for purposes of
                                                   The Exchange believes that the                                                                                 incremental credit for adding liquidity
                                                                                                           calculating the requirement, consistent                is also reasonable because it will
                                                proposed revised threshold for                             with the requirements currently found
                                                qualifying for Cross-Asset Tier 2 is                                                                              encourage liquidity and competition in
                                                                                                           in Cross-Asset Tier 1 and Cross-Asset                  Tape C securities quoted and traded on
                                                reasonable because it is designed to                       Tier 3, and would therefore provide
                                                encourage increased trading activity on                                                                           the Exchange.
                                                                                                           consistency and clarity to the Fee                        The Exchange believes the proposed
                                                the NYSE Arca options market. The                          Schedule.
                                                Exchange believes it is reasonable,                                                                               incremental credits are equitable and
                                                equitable and not unfairly                                    The Exchange believes that the                      not unfairly discriminatory because they
                                                discriminatory to require ETP Holders                      proposal is equitable and not unfairly                 are open to all ETP Holders and Market
                                                and Market Makers to meet the revised                      discriminatory because all ETP Holders                 Makers on an equal basis and provide
                                                threshold to qualify for Cross-Asset Tier                  would be subject to the same fee                       discounts that are reasonably related to
                                                2 because doing so would allow ETP                         structure. Moreover, the Cross-Asset                   the value to the Exchange’s market
                                                Holders and Market Makers to more                          Tier 2 fees and credits are available for              quality associated with higher volumes.
                                                easily qualify for the fees and credits                    all ETP Holders to satisfy, except for                 The Exchange further believes that the
                                                applicable to such participants.                           those ETP Holders that are not affiliated              proposed incremental rebate is not
                                                   The Exchange believes that the                          with an NYSE Arca Options OTP Holder                   unfairly discriminatory because the
                                                proposed modification to eliminate the                     or OTP Firm. ETP Holders that are not                  magnitude of the additional rebate is not
                                                alternate method to qualify for Cross-                     affiliated with an NYSE Arca Options                   unreasonably high in comparison to the
                                                                                                           OTP Holder or OTP Firm are still                       rebate paid with respect to other
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                Asset Tier 2 is reasonable, fair, and
                                                equitable because the alternate method                     eligible for fees and credits by means                 displayed liquidity-providing orders.
                                                was not providing the desired result of                    other than the Cross-Asset Tier.                       The Exchange does not believe that it is
                                                incentivizing ETP Holders and Market                       NASDAQ similarly charges certain fees                  unfairly discriminatory to offer
                                                Makers to increase their participation on                  based on both equity and options                       increased rebates to ETP Holders and
                                                                                                           volume.6                                               Market Makers as these participants
                                                  4 15   U.S.C. 78f(b).                                                                                           would be subject to additional volume
                                                  5 15   U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).                           6 See   NASDAQ Rule 7018.                            requirements in Tape C Securities.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014      18:01 Jun 19, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00065   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM   20JNN1


                                                28108                             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices

                                                   The Exchange believes that                                 Further, the proposal to amend the                     it appears to the Commission that such
                                                prohibiting Cross-Asset Tier 3 ETP                         requirements to qualify for Cross-Asset                   action is necessary or appropriate in the
                                                Holders and Market Makers from                             Tier 2 and Cross-Asset Tier 3 will not                    public interest, for the protection of
                                                qualifying for the Tape C Tier 1, Tape                     place an undue burden on competition                      investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
                                                C Tier 2, and Tape C Tier 3 tiers is                       because both tiers would remain                           the purposes of the Act. If the
                                                reasonable, equitable and not unfairly                     available for all ETP Holders to satisfy,                 Commission takes such action, the
                                                discriminatory because ETP Holders                         except those ETP Holders that are not                     Commission shall institute proceedings
                                                and Market Makers that qualify for                         affiliated with an NYSE Arca Options                      under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 10 of the Act to
                                                Cross-Asset Tier 3 and execute                             OTP Holder or OTP Firm. ETP Holders                       determine whether the proposed rule
                                                providing volume in Tape C Securities                      that are not affiliated with an NYSE                      change should be approved or
                                                during the billing month equal to at                       Arca Options OTP Holder or OTP Firm                       disapproved.
                                                least 0.35% of Tape C CADV would                           are eligible for similar fees and credits
                                                                                                                                                                     IV. Solicitation of Comments
                                                already receive an incremental Tape C                      by others means than the Cross-Asset
                                                credit of $0.0004 before the Tape C Tier                   pricing tiers.                                              Interested persons are invited to
                                                1, Tape C Tier 2, and Tape C Tier 3 tiers,                    Finally, the Exchange notes that it                    submit written data, views, and
                                                which is as equal to or higher than the                    operates in a highly competitive market                   arguments concerning the foregoing,
                                                those credits associated with the Tape C                   in which market participants can                          including whether the proposed rule
                                                tiers.                                                     readily favor competing venues if they                    change is consistent with the Act.
                                                   Further, with regards to Cross-Asset                    deem fee levels at a particular venue to                  Comments may be submitted by any of
                                                pricing in general, the Exchange                           be excessive or rebate opportunities                      the following methods:
                                                believes that the proposal is reasonable                   available at other venues to be more                      Electronic Comments
                                                and would continue to directly relate to                   favorable. In such an environment, the
                                                                                                           Exchange must continually adjust its                        • Use the Commission’s Internet
                                                the activity of an ETP Holder and the                                                                                comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
                                                activity of an affiliated OTP Holder or                    fees and rebates to remain competitive
                                                                                                           with other exchanges and with                             rules/sro.shtml); or
                                                OTP Firm on NYSE Arca Options,                                                                                         • Send an email to rule-comments@
                                                thereby encouraging increased trading                      alternative trading systems that have
                                                                                                                                                                     sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
                                                activity on both the NYSE Arca equity                      been exempted from compliance with
                                                                                                                                                                     NYSEArca–2017–64 on the subject line.
                                                and option markets. In this regard, the                    the statutory standards applicable to
                                                proposal is designed to bring additional                   exchanges. Because competitors are free                   Paper Comments
                                                posted order flow to NYSE Arca                             to modify their own fees and credits in                      • Send paper comments in triplicate
                                                Options, so as to provide additional                       response, and because market                              to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
                                                opportunities for all OTP Holders and                      participants may readily adjust their                     and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
                                                OTP Firms to trade on NYSE Arca                            order routing practices, the Exchange                     NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
                                                Options.                                                   believes that the degree to which fee                     All submissions should refer to File
                                                   Finally, the Exchange believes that it                  changes in this market may impose any                     Number SR–NYSEArca-2017–64. This
                                                is subject to significant competitive                      burden on competition is extremely                        file number should be included on the
                                                forces, as described below in the                          limited. As a result of all of these                      subject line if email is used. To help the
                                                Exchange’s statement regarding the                         considerations, the Exchange does not                     Commission process and review your
                                                burden on competition.                                     believe that the proposed changes will                    comments more efficiently, please use
                                                   For the foregoing reasons, the                          impair the ability of ETP Holders or                      only one method. The Commission will
                                                Exchange believes that the proposal is                     competing order execution venues to                       post all comments on the Commission’s
                                                consistent with the Act.                                   maintain their competitive standing in                    Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
                                                                                                           the financial markets.                                    rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
                                                B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                Statement on Burden on Competition                         C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                         submission, all subsequent
                                                                                                           Statement on Comments on the                              amendments, all written statements
                                                  In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of                    Proposed Rule Change Received From                        with respect to the proposed rule
                                                the Act,7 the Exchange believes that the                   Members, Participants, or Others                          change that are filed with the
                                                proposed rule change would not impose                                                                                Commission, and all written
                                                                                                             No written comments were solicited
                                                any burden on competition that is not                                                                                communications relating to the
                                                                                                           or received with respect to the proposed
                                                necessary or appropriate in furtherance                                                                              proposed rule change between the
                                                                                                           rule change.
                                                of the purposes of the Act. Instead, the                                                                             Commission and any person, other than
                                                Exchange believes that the proposed                        III. Date of Effectiveness of the                         those that may be withheld from the
                                                change would encourage the submission                      Proposed Rule Change and Timing for                       public in accordance with the
                                                of additional liquidity to a public                        Commission Action                                         provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
                                                exchange, thereby promoting price                             The foregoing rule change is effective                 available for Web site viewing and
                                                discovery and transparency and                             upon filing pursuant to Section                           printing in the Commission’s Public
                                                enhancing order execution                                  19(b)(3)(A) 8 of the Act and                              Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
                                                opportunities for ETP Holders and                          subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 9                       Washington, DC 20549 on official
                                                Market Makers. The Exchange believes                       thereunder, because it establishes a due,                 business days between the hours of
                                                that this could promote competition                        fee, or other charge imposed by the                       10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
                                                between the Exchange and other
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                           Exchange.                                                 filing also will be available for
                                                execution venues, including those that                        At any time within 60 days of the                      inspection and copying at the principal
                                                currently offer similar order types and                    filing of such proposed rule change, the                  office of the Exchange. All comments
                                                comparable transaction pricing, by                         Commission summarily may                                  received will be posted without change;
                                                encouraging additional orders to be sent                   temporarily suspend such rule change if                   the Commission does not edit personal
                                                to the Exchange for execution.                                                                                       identifying information from
                                                                                                             8 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                  7 15   U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).                                   9 17   CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).                              10 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014      18:01 Jun 19, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00066    Fmt 4703     Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM    20JNN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices                                           28109

                                                submissions. You should submit only                     places specified in Item IV below. The                 is seeking to identify each risk
                                                information that you wish to make                       Exchange has prepared summaries, set                   parameter specifically and describe the
                                                available publicly. All submissions                     forth in sections A, B, and C below, of                function of each parameter in Rule
                                                should refer to File Number SR–                         the most significant aspects of such                   804(g)(1)(A)–(D). For each feature, the
                                                NYSEArca–2017–64 and should be                          statements.                                            Exchange’s system (‘‘System’’) will
                                                submitted on or before July 11, 2017.                                                                          continue to automatically remove
                                                                                                        A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                      quotes in all series in an options class
                                                  For the Commission, by the Division of                Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                                Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated                                                                     when a certain threshold for any of the
                                                                                                        Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                 parameters has been exceeded.
                                                authority.11
                                                                                                        Change                                                    The Exchange elaborates in the
                                                Eduardo A. Aleman,
                                                Assistant Secretary.                                    1. Purpose                                             proposed rule that a market maker is
                                                                                                                                                               required to specify a period of time not
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–12761 Filed 6–19–17; 8:45 am]                The Exchange proposes to amend ISE
                                                                                                                                                               to exceed 30 seconds (‘‘Specified Time
                                                BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                  Rule 804, entitled ‘‘Market Maker                      Period’’) during which the system will
                                                                                                        Quotations’’ to amend the current rule                 automatically remove a Market Maker’s
                                                                                                        text at ISE Rule 804(g)(1) and (2) to                  quotes in all series of an options class.
                                                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                 adopt a revised description of the
                                                COMMISSION                                                                                                     The limitation of not to exceed 30
                                                                                                        manner in which ISE removes market                     seconds is new for ISE Members. In
                                                [Release No. 34–80944; File No. SR–ISE–                 maker quotes when certain risk                         order to establish a reasonable limit to
                                                2017–42)                                                parameters have been triggered. The                    the allowable Specified Time Period, an
                                                                                                        Exchange believes that the proposed                    ISE Member will be limited to the [sic]
                                                Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq                   new rule text will provide more detailed               setting their Specified Time period to no
                                                ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and                          information to participants concerning                 more than 30 seconds for these
                                                Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed                     the manner in which these risk features                Thresholds. A Specified Time Period
                                                Rule Change Regarding Market Maker                      will remove quotes from the Order                      will commence for an options class
                                                Quotations                                              Book.                                                  every time an execution occurs in any
                                                                                                           Today, ISE Rule 804(g)(1) provides                  series in such options class and will
                                                June 15, 2017.
                                                                                                        that a market maker must provide                       continue until the System removes
                                                   Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                  parameters by which the Exchange will
                                                Securities Exchange Act of 1934                                                                                quotes as described in proposed ISE
                                                                                                        automatically remove a market maker’s                  Rule 804(g)(2) or (3) or the Specified
                                                (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2                 quotations in all series of an options
                                                notice is hereby given that on June 12,                                                                        Time Period expires. This is the case
                                                                                                        class. If a market maker does not                      today, and is not changing. The
                                                2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or                       provide parameters then the Exchange
                                                ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities                                                                        Specified Time Periods will be the same
                                                                                                        will apply default parameters                          value described in subsections (A)–(D).
                                                and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or                     announced to members. The Exchange
                                                ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                                                                              Also, as is the case today, a Specified
                                                                                                        will automatically remove a market                     Time Period operates on a rolling basis
                                                change as described in Items I and II,                  maker’s quotation when, during a time
                                                below, which Items have been prepared                                                                          among all series in an options class in
                                                                                                        period established by the market maker,                that there may be Specified Time
                                                by the Exchange. The Commission is                      the market maker exceeds: (i) The
                                                publishing this notice to solicit                                                                              Periods occurring simultaneously for
                                                                                                        specified number of total contracts in                 each Threshold and such Specified
                                                comments on the proposed rule change                    the class, (ii) the specified percentage of
                                                from interested persons.                                                                                       Time Periods may overlap. If a Market
                                                                                                        the total size of the market maker’s                   Maker does not provide parameters, the
                                                I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                       quotes in the class, (iii) the specified               Exchange will apply default parameters,
                                                Statement of the Terms of Substance of                  absolute value of the net between                      which default settings will be
                                                the Proposed Rule Change                                contracts bought and contracts sold in                 announced to Members via an Options
                                                   The Exchange proposes to amend                       the class, or (iv) the specified absolute              Trader Alert.
                                                Rule 804, entitled ‘‘Market Maker                       value of the net between (a) calls                        Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(A) describes
                                                Quotations.’’                                           purchased plus puts sold in the class,                 in greater detail the operation of the
                                                   The text of the proposed rule change                 and (b) calls sold plus puts purchased                 Percentage Threshold. As is the case
                                                is available on the Exchange’s Web site                 in the class.                                          today, a Market Maker must provide a
                                                at www.ise.com, at the principal office                    The Exchange proposes to adopt new                  specified percentage of quote size
                                                of the Exchange, and at the                             rule text, which continues to require a                (‘‘Percentage Threshold’’), of not less
                                                Commission’s Public Reference Room.                     market maker to provide parameters by                  than 1%, by which the System will
                                                                                                        which the Exchange will automatically                  automatically remove a Market Maker’s
                                                II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                      remove a market maker’s quotations in                  quotes in all series of an options class.
                                                Statement of the Purpose of, and                        all series of an options class. If a market            The Exchange is adding more detail
                                                Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                  maker does not provide parameters then                 about the manner in which the System
                                                Change                                                  the Exchange will apply default                        will calculate percentages and
                                                   In its filing with the Commission, the               parameters announced to members. This                  amending the current rule to change its
                                                Exchange included statements                            is not being amended, rather it is being               operation. For each series in an options
                                                concerning the purpose of and basis for                 expanded.                                              class, the System will determine (i)
                                                                                                           The proposed rule text in 804(g)(1)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                the proposed rule change and discussed                                                                         during a Specified Time Period and for
                                                any comments it received on the                         makes clear that market makers are                     each side in a given series, a percentage
                                                proposed rule change. The text of these                 required to utilize the Percentage,                    calculated by dividing the size of a
                                                statements may be examined at the                       Volume, Delta and Vega Thresholds,                     Market Maker’s quote size executed in
                                                                                                        each a Threshold, described in                         a particular series (the numerator) by
                                                  11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                            subsections (A)–(D) in the new rule text.              the Marker Maker’s quote size available
                                                  1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                These are the same risk parameters that                at the time of execution plus the total
                                                  2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                   are offered today by ISE. The Exchange                 number of the Market Marker’s quote


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:01 Jun 19, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00067   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM   20JNN1



Document Created: 2017-06-20 02:21:13
Document Modified: 2017-06-20 02:21:13
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation82 FR 28106 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR