82 FR 28238 - Safety Zone; Dunkirk Lakeshore Air Show; Lake Erie, Dunkirk, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 118 (June 21, 2017)

Page Range		28238-28240
FR Document		2017-12936

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on Lake Erie, Dunkirk, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Lake Erie during the Dunkirk Lakeshore Air Show on July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2017. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect participants, spectators, and vessels from the hazards associated with aerial stunts, low flying aircraft, and aircraft maneuvers. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP).

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28238-28240]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0277]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Dunkirk Lakeshore Air Show; Lake Erie, Dunkirk, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on 
Lake Erie, Dunkirk, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict 
vessels from a portion of Lake Erie during the Dunkirk Lakeshore Air 
Show on July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2017. This temporary safety zone is 
necessary to protect participants, spectators, and vessels from the 
hazards associated with aerial stunts, low flying aircraft, and 
aircraft maneuvers. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is 
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo (COTP).

DATES: This rule is effective from 12:45 p.m. on July 1, 2017, to 5:15 
p.m. on July 2, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0277 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of 
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9322, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency finds good cause that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 
good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The final details 
for this event were not provided to the Coast Guard until there was 
insufficient time remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, 
delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period 
to run would be both impracticable and contrary to the public interest 
because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect 
spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with an air show 
over a navigable waterway.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register because doing so would be 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Delaying the 
effective date would be contrary to the rule's objectives of ensuring 
safety of life on the navigable waters and protection of persons and 
vessels near the event.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard issues this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. 
On July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2017, between 12:45 p.m. and 5:15 p.m. each 
day, an air show will be held on the shoreline of Lake Erie in Dunkirk, 
NY. It is anticipated that there will be a heavy amount of recreational 
boating traffic present to view the air show. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo has determined that potential hazards associated with an air 
show over a navigable waterway pose a significant risk to public safety 
and property within the immediate location of the show.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 12:45 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. on 
July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2017. The safety zone will encompass all 
waters of Lake Erie;

[[Page 28239]]

Dunkirk, NY starting at position 42[deg]29'22'' N. and 079[deg]20'30'' 
W. then Northwest to 42[deg]29'37'' N. and 079[deg]20'41'' W. then 
Northeast to position 42[deg]30'11'' N. and 079[deg]19'23'' W. then 
Southeast to position 42[deg]30'05'' N. and 079[deg]19'08'' W. and then 
following the shoreline and breakwall to the point of origin (NAD 83). 
The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of spectators 
and vessels during the Dunkirk Lakeshore Air Show. No vessel or person 
will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission 
from the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to 
reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for 
every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be 
identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be 
prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory 
action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is 
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's 
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the 
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced for a relatively short time. Also, the 
safety zone is designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. 
Furthermore, the safety zone has been designed to allow vessels to 
transit around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that 
particular area are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, 
moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone when 
permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that it 
is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule establishes a temporary safety zone. It is categorically excluded 
under section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g) of the

[[Page 28240]]

Instruction, which pertains to establishment of safety zones. A Record 
of Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting this determination is 
available in the docket where indicated in the ADDRESSES section of 
this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0277 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0277   Safety Zone; Dunkirk Lakeshore Air Show; Lake 
Erie, Dunkirk, NY.

    (a) Location. This zone will encompass all waters of Lake Erie; 
Dunkirk, NY starting at position 42[deg]29'22'' N. and 079[deg]20'30'' 
W. then Northwest to 42[deg]29'37'' N. and 079[deg]20'41'' W. then 
Northeast to position 42[deg]30'11'' N. and 079[deg]19'23'' W. then 
Southeast to position 42[deg]30'05'' N. and 079[deg]19'08'' W. and then 
following the shoreline and breakwall to the point of origin (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from 12:45 
p.m. until 5:15 p.m. on July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2017.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 13, 2017.
J.S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2017-12936 Filed 6-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 28239

Dunkirk, NY starting at position zone created by this rule will be C. Collection of Information
42°29′22″ N. and 079°20′30″ W. then relatively small and enforced for a This rule will not call for a new
Northwest to 42°29′37″ N. and relatively short time. Also, the safety collection of information under the
079°20′41″ W. then Northeast to zone is designed to minimize its impact Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
position 42°30′11″ N. and 079°19′23″ W. on navigable waters. Furthermore, the U.S.C. 3501–3520).
then Southeast to position 42°30′05″ N. safety zone has been designed to allow
and 079°19′08″ W. and then following vessels to transit around it. Thus, D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
the shoreline and breakwall to the point restrictions on vessel movement within Governments
of origin (NAD 83). The duration of the that particular area are expected to be A rule has implications for federalism
zone is intended to ensure the safety of minimal. Under certain conditions, under Executive Order 13132,
spectators and vessels during the moreover, vessels may still transit Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
Dunkirk Lakeshore Air Show. No vessel through the safety zone when permitted effect on the States, on the relationship
or person will be permitted to enter the by the Captain of the Port. between the national government and
safety zone without obtaining the States, or on the distribution of
permission from the COTP or a B. Impact on Small Entities
power and responsibilities among the
designated representative. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of various levels of government. We have
V. Regulatory Analyses 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, analyzed this rule under that Order and
requires Federal agencies to consider have determined that it is consistent
We developed this rule after with the fundamental federalism
considering numerous statutes and the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The principles and preemption requirements
Executive orders related to rulemaking. described in Executive Order 13132.
Below we summarize our analyses term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations Also, this rule does not have tribal
based on a number of these statutes and implications under Executive Order
Executive orders, and we discuss First that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their 13175, Consultation and Coordination
Amendment rights of protestors. with Indian Tribal Governments,
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
A. Regulatory Planning and Review with populations of less than 50,000. because it does not have a substantial
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. direct effect on one or more Indian
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 tribes, on the relationship between the
direct agencies to assess the costs and 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
benefits of available regulatory or on the distribution of power and
alternatives and, if regulation is substantial number of small entities.
responsibilities between the Federal
necessary, to select regulatory While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you
approaches that maximize net benefits. vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
importance of quantifying both costs reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR
and benefits, of reducing costs, of rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
harmonizing rules, and of promoting economic impact on any vessel owner above.
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 or operator.
(‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Regulatory Costs’’), directs agencies to Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
reduce regulation and control regulatory Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
costs and provides that ‘‘for every one we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of
new regulation issued, at least two prior understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
regulations be identified for elimination, would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
and that the cost of planned regulations organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
be prudently managed and controlled jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
through a budgeting process.’’ concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
This rule has not been designated a $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
compliance, please contact the person
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under more in any one year. Though this rule
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it will not result in such an expenditure,
CONTACT section.
has not been reviewed by the Office of we do discuss the effects of this rule
Management and Budget. Small businesses may send comments elsewhere in this preamble.
As this rule is not a significant on the actions of Federal employees
regulatory action, this rule is exempt who enforce, or otherwise determine F. Environment
from the requirements of Executive compliance with, Federal regulations to We have analyzed this rule under
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum the Small Business and Agriculture Department of Homeland Security
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Management Directive 023–01 and
Section 2 of the Executive Order of and the Regional Small Business Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing Regulatory Fairness Boards. The which guide the Coast Guard in
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Ombudsman evaluates these actions complying with the National
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). annually and rates each agency’s Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES

We conclude that this rule is not a responsiveness to small business. If you U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
significant regulatory action because we wish to comment on actions by determined that it is one of a category
anticipate that it will have minimal employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– of actions that do not individually or
impact on the economy, will not 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The cumulatively have a significant effect on
interfere with other agencies, will not Coast Guard will not retaliate against the human environment. This rule
adversely alter the budget of any grant small entities that question or complain establishes a temporary safety zone. It is
or loan recipients, and will not raise any about this rule or any policy or action categorically excluded under section
novel legal or policy issues. The safety of the Coast Guard. 2.B.2, figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g) of the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Jun 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM 21JNR1

28240 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

Instruction, which pertains to (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of withdrawal in the Federal Register to
establishment of safety zones. A Record the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any notify the public that this direct final
of Environmental Consideration (REC) Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or rule will not take effect.
supporting this determination is petty officer who has been designated ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
available in the docket where indicated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
in the ADDRESSES section of this on his behalf. OAR–2016–0647 at http://
preamble. (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter www.regulations.gov, or via email to
or operate within the safety zone must Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office
G. Protest Activities
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo Chief at Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For
The Coast Guard respects the First or his on-scene representative to obtain comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
Amendment rights of protesters. permission to do so. The Captain of the follow the online instructions for
Protesters are asked to contact the Port Buffalo or his on-scene submitting comments. Once submitted,
person listed in the FOR FURTHER representative may be contacted via comments cannot be removed or edited
INFORMATION CONTACT section to VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
coordinate protest activities so that your from Regulations.gov. For either manner
permission to enter or operate in the of submission, the EPA may publish any
message can be received without safety zone must comply with all
jeopardizing the safety or security of comment received to its public docket.
directions given to them by the Captain Do not submit electronically any
people, places or vessels. of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene information you consider to be
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 representative. Confidential Business Information (CBI)
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Dated: June 13, 2017. or other information whose disclosure is
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping J.S. Dufresne, restricted by statute. Multimedia
requirements, Security measures, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
Waterways. Port Buffalo. accompanied by a written comment.
For the reasons discussed in the [FR Doc. 2017–12936 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am] The written comment is considered the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
official comment and should include
CFR part 165 as follows: discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION consider comments or comment
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS AGENCY contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 40 CFR Part 52 other file sharing system). For
continues to read as follows: additional submission methods, please
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0647; FRL–9960–40– contact the person identified in the FOR
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Region 9]
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Department of Homeland Security Delegation For the full EPA public comment policy,
No. 0170.1. Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Mojave Desert Air Quality information about CBI or multimedia
■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0277 to read as submissions, and general guidance on
Management District, Northern Sierra
follows: making effective comments, please visit
Air Quality Management District, and
§ 165.T09–0277 Safety Zone; Dunkirk San Diego County Air Pollution Control http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Lakeshore Air Show; Lake Erie, Dunkirk, District commenting-epa-dockets.
NY. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(a) Location. This zone will AGENCY: Environmental Protection Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
encompass all waters of Lake Erie; Agency (EPA). 972–3024, Lazarus.Arnold@epa.gov.
Dunkirk, NY starting at position ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
42°29′22″ N. and 079°20′30″ W. then Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Northwest to 42°29′37″ N. and and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
079°20′41″ W. then Northeast to Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
position 42°30′11″ N. and 079°19′23″ W. action to approve revisions to the Table of Contents
then Southeast to position 42°30′05″ N. Mojave Desert Air Quality Management
District (MDAQMD), Northern Sierra I. The State’s Submittal
and 079°19′08″ W. and then following A. What rules did the State submit?
the shoreline and breakwall to the point Air Quality Management District B. Are there other versions of these rules?
of origin (NAD 83). (NSAQMD), and San Diego County Air C. What is the purpose of the submitted
(b) Enforcement period. This Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) rule and rule revisions?
regulation will be enforced from 12:45 portions of the California State II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
p.m. until 5:15 p.m. on July 1, 2017 and Implementation Plan (SIP). These A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
revisions concern aerospace assembly, B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
July 2, 2017.
rework, and component manufacturing criteria?
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
operations; emissions statements and C. EPA Recommendations To Further
the general regulations in § 165.23 of Improve the Rules
this part, entry into, transiting, or recordkeeping; and definitions,
D. Public Comment and Final Action
anchoring within this safety zone is respectively. We are approving local III. Incorporation by Reference
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES

prohibited unless authorized by the rules that regulate these sources and IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his issues under the Clean Air Act (CAA or
designated on-scene representative. the Act). I. The State’s Submittal
(2) This safety zone is closed to all DATES: This rule is effective on August
vessel traffic, except as may be 21, 2017 without further notice, unless A. What rules did the State submit?
permitted by the Captain of the Port the EPA receives adverse comments by Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
Buffalo or his designated on-scene July 21, 2017. If we receive such this action with the dates that they were
representative. comments, we will publish a timely adopted by the local air agencies and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Jun 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM 21JNR1

Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:08:34
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:08:34

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 12:45 p.m. on July 1, 2017, to 5:15 p.m. on July 2, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716- 843-9322, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 28238
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 28238 - Safety Zone; Dunkirk Lakeshore Air Show; Lake Erie, Dunkirk, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 118 (June 21, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard