82 FR 28373 - Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Mitsubishi Motors

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 118 (June 21, 2017)

Page Range		28373-28375
FR Document		2017-12880

This document grants in full the Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America, Inc.'s (Mitsubishi) petition for exemption of the Mitsubishi [Confidential] vehicle line in accordance with Exemption from the Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. Mitsubishi also requested confidential treatment for specific information in its petition. While official notification on granting or denying Mitsubishi's request for confidential treatment will be addressed by separate letter, no confidential information provided for purposes of this document has been disclosed.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28373-28375]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention 
Standard; Mitsubishi Motors

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Mitsubishi Motors R&D of 
America, Inc.'s (Mitsubishi) petition for exemption of the Mitsubishi 
[Confidential] vehicle line in accordance with Exemption from the Theft 
Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has 
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as 
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and 
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking 
requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. 
Mitsubishi also requested confidential treatment for specific 
information in its petition. While official notification on granting or 
denying Mitsubishi's request for confidential treatment will be 
addressed by separate letter, no confidential information provided for 
purposes of this document has been disclosed.

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with 
the 2018 model year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hisham Mohamed, Office of 
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West 
Building, W43-437, 1200 New Jersey

[[Page 28374]]

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Mohamed's phone number is (202) 
366-0307. His fax number is (202) 493-2990.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated March 30, 2017, 
Mitsubishi requested exemption from the parts-marking requirements of 
the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541) for the Mitsubishi 
[Confidential] vehicle line, beginning with MY 2018. The petition 
requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR 543, 
Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, based on the 
installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment for the 
entire vehicle line.
    Under Sec.  543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an 
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, 
Mitsubishi provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, 
design, and location of the components of the antitheft device for the 
[Confidential] vehicle line. Mitsubishi will install a passive, 
transponder-based, electronic engine immobilizer device as standard 
equipment on its [Confidential] vehicle line beginning with MY 2018. 
Key components of the antitheft device will include a transponder key, 
electronic control unit (ECU), and a passive immobilizer. Mitsubishi 
also stated that it will be incorporating an audible and visual alarm 
system as standard equipment on these trim-line vehicles. Mitsubishi's 
submission is considered a complete petition as required by 49 CFR 
543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in 543.5 and 
the specific content requirements of 543.6.
    Mitsubishi stated that its entry models for the [Confidential] 
vehicle line will be equipped with a Wireless Control Module (WCM) 
immobilizer. Mitsubishi explained that this is a key entry system in 
which the transponder is located in a traditional key that must be 
inserted into the key cylinder in order to activate the ignition. All 
other models of the [Confidential] vehicle line are equipped with a 
One-touch Starting System (OSS), which utilizes a keyless system that 
allows the driver to press a button located on the instrument panel to 
activate and deactivate the ignition (instead of using a traditional 
key in the key cylinder) as long as the transponder is located in close 
proximity to the driver.
    Once the ignition switch is turned (pushed) to the ignition-on 
position, the transceiver module reads the specific ignition key code 
for the vehicle and transmits an encrypted message containing the key 
code to the electronic control unit (ECU). The immobilizer receives the 
key code signal transmitted from either type of key (WCM or OSS) and 
verifies that the key code signal is correct. The immobilizer then 
sends a separate encrypted start-code signal to the engine ECU to allow 
the driver to start the vehicle. The engine only will function if the 
key code matches the unique identification key code previously 
programmed into the ECU. If the codes do not match, the engine and fuel 
system will be disabled.
    In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, 
Mitsubishi provided information on the reliability and durability of 
its proposed device. To ensure reliability and durability of the 
device, Mitsubishi conducted tests based on its own specified 
standards. Mitsubishi provided a detailed list of the tests conducted 
and believes that the device is reliable and durable since the device 
complied with its specific requirements for each test. Mitsubishi 
additionally stated that its immobilizer system is further enhanced by 
several factors making it very difficult to defeat. Specifically, 
Mitsubishi stated that communication between the transponder and the 
ECU are encrypted and its WCM and OSS have over 4.3 billion different 
possible key codes that make successful key code duplication virtually 
impossible. Mitsubishi also stated that its immobilizer system and the 
ECU share security data during vehicle assembly that make them a 
matched set. These matched modules will not function if taken out and 
reinstalled separately on other vehicles. Mitsubishi also stated that 
it is impossible to mechanically override the system and start the 
vehicle because the vehicle will not be able to start without the 
transmission of the specific code to the electronic control module. 
Lastly, Mitsubishi stated that the antitheft device is extremely 
reliable and durable because there are no moving parts, nor does the 
key require a separate battery.
    Mitsubishi also informed the agency that its Eclipse vehicle line 
has been equipped with the antitheft device beginning with its MY 2000 
vehicles. Mitsubishi stated that the theft rate for the MY 2000 Eclipse 
decreased by almost 42% when compared with that of its MY 1999 
Mitsubishi Eclipse (unequipped with an immobilizer device). Mitsubishi 
also revealed that the Galant, Endeavor, Outlander, Lancer, Outlander 
Sport, i-MiEV and Mirage vehicle lines have been equipped with a 
similar type of immobilizer device since January 2004, April 2004, 
September 2006, March 2007, September 2010, October 2011 and July 2013, 
respectively. All eight vehicle lines have been granted parts-marking 
exemptions by the agency. The average theft rates for the Mitsubishi 
Galant, Endeavor, Outlander and Lancer vehicle lines using an average 
of 3 MY's data are 3.6664, 1.7721, 0.7253 and 0.9747 respectively. 
Therefore, Mitsubishi has concluded that the antitheft device proposed 
for its vehicle line is no less effective than those devices in the 
lines for which NHTSA has already granted full exemption from the 
parts-marking requirements.
    Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Mitsubishi on the 
device, the agency believes that the antitheft device for the 
[Confidential] vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing 
and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking 
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). The 
agency concludes that the device will provide the five types of 
performance listed in Sec.  543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; attract 
attention to the efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or move a 
vehicle by means other than a key; preventing defeat or circumvention 
of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the 
vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and 
durability of the device.
    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants 
a petition for an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part 
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon 
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely 
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as 
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The agency 
finds that Mitsubishi has provided adequate reasons for its belief that 
the antitheft device for the Mitsubishi [Confidential] vehicle line is 
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft 
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft 
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the 
information Mitsubishi provided about its device.
    For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full 
Mitsubishi's petition for exemption for the [Confidential] vehicle line 
from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with 
its MY 2018 model year vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, 
Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft 
Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) 
contains publication requirements incident to the disposition of all 
part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future 
product

[[Page 28375]]

nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is granted 
and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order 
to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from 
the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard. 
Mitsubishi stated that an official nameplate for the vehicle has not 
yet been determined. However, as a condition to the formal granting of 
Mitsubishi's petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements 
of 49 CFR part 541 for the MY 2018 [Confidential] vehicle line, the 
agency fully expects Mitsubishi to notify the agency of the nameplate 
for the vehicle line prior to its introduction into the United States 
commerce for sale.
    If Mitsubishi decides not to use the exemption for this line, it 
must formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line 
must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6 
(marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
    NHTSA notes that if Mitsubishi wishes in the future to modify the 
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit 
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a part 
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted 
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the 
line's exemption is based. Further, Sec.  543.9(c)(2) provides for the 
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of 
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in 
that exemption.''
    The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that part 
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself. 
The agency did not intend part 543 to require the submission of a 
modification petition for every change to the components or design of 
an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de 
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer 
contemplates making any changes, the effects of which might be 
characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before 
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 
part 1.95.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2017-12880 Filed 6-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Notices 28373

Percent L/PD, SA–5, Suite 5H03, Washington, 11. Adjourn
DC 20522–0505. Attendance is open to the interested
Non-Profit Organizations with- public but limited to space availability.
out Credit Available Else- Alyson Grunder,
With the approval of the chairman,
where ..................................... 2.500 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs, members of the public may present oral
Department of State. statements at the meeting. Persons
The number assigned to this disaster
wishing to present statements or obtain
for physical damage is 15170 B and for [FR Doc. 2017–12860 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am]
information should contact the person
economic injury is 15171 0. BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
The States which received an EIDL listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
Declaration # is INDIANA.
may present a written statement to the
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION committee at any time.
Number 59008)
Federal Aviation Administration Issued in Washington, DC, on June 15,
Dated: June 14, 2017. 2017.
Linda E. McMahon, Fiftieth RTCA SC–224 Standards for Mohannad Dawoud,
Administrator. Airport Security Access Control Management & Program Analyst, Partnership
[FR Doc. 2017–12950 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am] Systems Plenary Contracts Branch, ANG–A17, NextGen,
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P Procurement Services Division, Federal
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Aviation Administration.
Administration (FAA), U.S. Department [FR Doc. 2017–12854 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am]
of Transportation (DOT).
DEPARTMENT OF STATE BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ACTION: Fiftieth RTCA SC–224
[Public Notice: 10041] Standards for Airport Security Access
Control Systems Plenary. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Notice of Determinations; Culturally
Significant Objects Imported for SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice National Highway Traffic Safety
Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘India to advise the public of a meeting of Administration
Modern: The Paintings of M.F. Husain’’ Fiftieth RTCA SC–224 Standards for
Exhibition Airport Security Access Control Petition for Exemption From the
Systems Plenary. Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Notice is hereby given of the
DATES: The meeting will be held August Mitsubishi Motors
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of 03, 2017 10:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Safety Administration (NHTSA),
2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th Street Department of Transportation (DOT).
Foreign Affairs Reform and NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036. ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et Karan Hofmann at khofmann@rtca.org SUMMARY: This document grants in full
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of or 202–330–0680, or The RTCA the Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America,
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite Inc.’s (Mitsubishi) petition for
No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by exemption of the Mitsubishi
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202) [Confidential] vehicle line in
257–1 of December 11, 2015), I hereby 833–9434, or Web site at http:// accordance with Exemption from the
determine that certain objects to be www.rtca.org. Theft Prevention Standard. This
included in the exhibition ‘‘India petition is granted because the agency
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant has determined that the antitheft device
Modern: The Paintings of M.F. Husain,’’ to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
imported from abroad for temporary to be placed on the line as standard
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– equipment is likely to be as effective in
exhibition within the United States, are 463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby
of cultural significance. The objects are reducing and deterring motor vehicle
given for a meeting of the Fiftieth RTCA theft as compliance with the parts-
imported pursuant to a loan agreement SC–224 Standards for Airport Security
with the foreign owner or custodian. I marking requirements of the Federal
Access Control Systems Plenary. The Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
also determine that the exhibition or agenda will include the following:
display of the exhibit objects at The Art Standard. Mitsubishi also requested
Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, Thursday, August 3, 2017, 10:00 a.m.– confidential treatment for specific
from on or about July 14, 2017, until on 1:00 p.m. information in its petition. While
or about March 4, 2018, and at possible official notification on granting or
1. Welcome/Introductions/
additional exhibitions or venues yet to denying Mitsubishi’s request for
Administrative Remarks
be determined, is in the national confidential treatment will be addressed
2. Review/Approve Previous Meeting
interest. I have ordered that Public by separate letter, no confidential
Summary
Notice of these Determinations be information provided for purposes of
3. Report on TSA participation
this document has been disclosed.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES

published in the Federal Register. 4. Report on Document Distribution
For further information, including a Mechanisms DATES: The exemption granted by this
list of the imported objects, contact the 5. Report on the New Guidelines and notice is effective beginning with the
Office of Public Diplomacy and Public other Safe Skies Reports 2018 model year.
Affairs in the Office of the Legal 6. Review of DO–230H Sections FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adviser, U.S. Department of State 7. Commencement of FRAC process Hisham Mohamed, Office of
(telephone: 202–632–6471; email: 8. Action Items for Next Meeting International Policy, Fuel Economy and
section2459@state.gov). The mailing 9. Time and Place of Next Meeting Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West
address is U.S. Department of State, 10. Any Other Business Building, W43–437, 1200 New Jersey

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:12 Jun 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Notices 28375

nameplates, the beginning model year DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION location of the components of the
for which the petition is granted and a antitheft device for the (confidential)
general description of the antitheft National Highway Traffic Safety vehicle line. Nissan stated that the MY
device is necessary in order to notify Administration 2018 (confidential) vehicle line will be
law enforcement agencies of new installed with a passive, electronic
Petition for Exemption From the engine immobilizer antitheft device as
vehicle lines exempted from the parts- Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention standard equipment. Key components of
marking requirements of the Theft Standard; Nissan North America, Inc.
Prevention Standard. Mitsubishi stated the antitheft device will include an
that an official nameplate for the vehicle AGENCY: National Highway Traffic engine immobilizer, engine control
Safety Administration (NHTSA), module (ECM), security indicator light,
has not yet been determined. However,
Department of Transportation (DOT). immobilizer antenna, Key FOB, and a
as a condition to the formal granting of
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
specially-designed key with a
Mitsubishi’s petition for exemption microchip. Nissan will not provide any
from the parts-marking requirements of SUMMARY: This document grants in full visible or audible indication of
49 CFR part 541 for the MY 2018 the Nissan North America, Inc.’s, unauthorized vehicle entry on the
[Confidential] vehicle line, the agency (Nissan) petition for exemption of the (confidential) vehicle line.
fully expects Mitsubishi to notify the (confidential) vehicle line in accordance Nissan’s submission is considered a
agency of the nameplate for the vehicle with the Exemption from the Theft complete petition as required by 49 CFR
line prior to its introduction into the Prevention Standard. This petition is 543.7, in that it meets the general
United States commerce for sale. granted because the agency has requirements contained in § 543.5 and
If Mitsubishi decides not to use the determined that the antitheft device to the specific content requirements of
exemption for this line, it must formally be placed on the line as standard § 543.6.
equipment is likely to be as effective in In addressing the specific content
notify the agency. If such a decision is
reducing and deterring motor vehicle requirements of 543.6, Nissan provided
made, the line must be fully marked as information on the reliability and
required by 49 CFR parts 541.5 and theft as compliance with the parts-
marking requirements of the Federal durability of its proposed device. Nissan
541.6 (marking of major component stated that its antitheft device is tested
parts and replacement parts). Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard (Theft Prevention Standard). for specific parameters to ensure its
NHTSA notes that if Mitsubishi Nissan also requested confidential reliability and durability. Nissan
wishes in the future to modify the treatment for specific information in its provided a detailed list of the tests
device on which this exemption is petition. While official notification conducted and believes that the device
based, the company may have to submit granting or denying its request for is reliable and durable since the device
a petition to modify the exemption. Part confidential treatment will be addressed complied with its specified
543.7(d) states that a part 543 exemption by separate letter, no confidential requirements for each test. Nissan
applies only to vehicles that belong to information provided for purposes of further stated that its immobilizer
a line exempted under this part and this document has been disclosed. device satisfies the European Directive
equipped with the antitheft device on ECE R116, including tamper resistance.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
Nissan also stated that all control units
which the line’s exemption is based. notice is effective beginning with the for the device are located inside the
Further, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for the 2018 model year (MY). vehicle, providing further protection
submission of petitions ‘‘to modify an FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. from unauthorized accessibility of the
exemption to permit the use of an Carlita Ballard, Office of International device from outside the vehicle.
antitheft device similar to but differing Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Nissan stated that activation of its
from the one specified in that Programs, National Highway Traffic immobilizer device occurs
exemption.’’ Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey automatically when the ignition switch
The agency wishes to minimize the Avenue SE., West Building, Room W43– is turned to the ‘‘OFF’’ position which
administrative burden that part 439, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. then causes the security indicator light
Ballard’s telephone phone number is to flash notifying the operator that the
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
(202) 366–5222. Her fax number is (202) immobilizer device is activated. Nissan
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
493–2990. stated that the immobilizer device
agency did not intend part 543 to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a prevents normal operation of the vehicle
require the submission of a modification
petition dated March 31, 2017, Nissan without using a specially-designed
petition for every change to the
requested an exemption from the parts- microchip key with a pre-registered
components or design of an antitheft
marking requirements of the Theft ‘‘Key-ID’’. Nissan also stated that, when
device. The significance of many such Prevention Standard for the the brake and clutch is on and the key
changes could be de minimis. Therefore, (confidential) vehicle line beginning FOB is near the engine start switch, the
NHTSA suggests that if the with MY 2018. The petition requested Key-ID is scanned via the immobilizer
manufacturer contemplates making any an exemption from parts-marking antenna. The microchip in the key
changes, the effects of which might be pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption transmits the Key-ID to the BCM,
characterized as de minimis, it should from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, beginning an encrypted communication
consult the agency before preparing and
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES

based on the installation of an antitheft process. If the Key-ID and encrypted
submitting a petition to modify. device as standard equipment for the code are correct, the ECM will allow the
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority entire vehicle line. engine to keep running and the driver
delegated in 49 CFR part 1.95. Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a to operate the vehicle. If the Key-ID and
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to encrypted code are not correct, the ECM
Raymond R. Posten,
grant an exemption for one vehicle line will cause the engine to shut down.
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. per model year. In its petition, Nissan Nissan stated that the proposed
[FR Doc. 2017–12880 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am] provided a detailed description and device is functionally equivalent to the
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P diagram of the identity, design, and antitheft device installed on the MY

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:12 Jun 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1

Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:08:42
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:08:42

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Grant of petition for exemption.
Dates		The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with the 2018 model year.
Contact		Hisham Mohamed, Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West Building, W43-437, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Mohamed's phone number is (202) 366-0307. His fax number is (202) 493-2990.
FR Citation		82 FR 28373

82 FR 28373 - Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Mitsubishi Motors

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 118 (June 21, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration