82 FR 30745 - Safety Zone; Thunder on the Outer Harbor; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 126 (July 3, 2017)

Page Range		30745-30747
FR Document		2017-13977

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Buffalo Outer Harbor during the Thunder on the Outer Harbor boat races. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards associated with high speed boat races.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 126 (Monday, July 3, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 126 (Monday, July 3, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30745-30747]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13977]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0331]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Thunder on the Outer Harbor; Buffalo Outer Harbor, 
Buffalo, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY. This safety zone is intended to 
restrict vessels from a portion of the Buffalo Outer Harbor during the 
Thunder on the Outer Harbor boat races. This temporary safety zone is 
necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards 
associated with high speed boat races.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9:45 a.m. on July 22, 2017 until 
4:15 p.m. on July 23, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0331 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. 
Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9322, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On May 11, 2017, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NPRM) titled Thunder on the Outer Harbor; Buffalo Outer 
Harbor, Buffalo, NY Sec.  165.T09-0331. There we stated why we issued 
the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action 
related to this high speed boat race. The comment period ended June 16, 
2017; we received no comments.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register because doing so would 
be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Delaying the 
effective date would be contrary to the rule's objectives of ensuring 
safety of life on the navigable waters and protection of persons and 
vessels near the event. The event has been publicized in the local 
media and previously in the Federal Register through issuance of the 
NPRM; the public does not need time to make preparations for this rule 
to go into effect.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined that a high 
speed boat races present significant risks to public safety and 
property. Such hazards include vessels reaching high speeds in a 
relatively small area and large wake. This rule is needed to protect 
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters 
within the safety zone while the boat races are taking place.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone on June 22 and June 23, 2017, 
from 9:45 a.m. until 4:15 p.m. daily. The safety zone will encompass 
all waters of the Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY starting at 
position 42[deg]52'21'' N. and 078[deg]53'14'' W. then West to 
42[deg]52'15'' N. and 078[deg]53'32'' W. then South to

[[Page 30746]]

42[deg]51'41'' N. and 078[deg]53'02'' W. then East to 42[deg]51'46'' N. 
and 078[deg]52'45'' W. (NAD 83) then returning to the point of origin.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and is designed to minimize its impact on navigable 
waters. Furthermore, the safety zone has been designed to allow vessels 
to transit around it. In addition, the safety zone will have built in 
times to allow vessels to travel through when races are not being held. 
Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that particular area are 
expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may 
still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of 
the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that it 
is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule establishes a safety zone. It is categorically excluded under 
section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction, which 
pertains to establishment of safety zones. A Record of Environmental 
Consideration (REC) supporting this determination is available in the 
docket where indicated

[[Page 30747]]

in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165-REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0331 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0331  Safety Zone; Thunder on the Outer Harbor; Buffalo 
Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY.

    (a) Location. This zone will encompass all waters of the Buffalo 
Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY encompassed by all waters of the Outer 
Harbor, Buffalo, NY starting at position 42[deg]52'21'' N. and 
078[deg]53'14'' W. then West to 42[deg]52'15'' N. and 078[deg]53'32'' 
W. then South to 42[deg]51'41'' N. and 078[deg]53'02'' W. then East to 
42[deg]51'46'' N. and 078[deg]52'45'' W. (NAD 83) then returning to the 
point of origin.
    (b) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 9:45 a.m. 
until 4:15 p.m. on July 22, 2017, and July 23, 2017.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo 
or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 28, 2017.
J.S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2017-13977 Filed 6-30-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

30746 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 126 / Monday, July 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

42°51′41″ N. and 078°53′02″ W. then term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
East to 42°51′46’’ N. and 078°52′45″ W. businesses, not-for-profit organizations Governments
(NAD 83) then returning to the point of that are independently owned and A rule has implications for federalism
origin. operated and are not dominant in their under Executive Order 13132,
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring fields, and governmental jurisdictions Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
within the safety zone is prohibited with populations of less than 50,000. effect on the States, on the relationship
unless authorized by the Captain of the The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. between the national government and
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene 605(b) that this rule will not have a the States, or on the distribution of
representative. The Captain of the Port significant economic impact on a power and responsibilities among the
or his designated on-scene substantial number of small entities. various levels of government. We have
representative may be contacted via
While some owners or operators of analyzed this rule under that Order and
VHF Channel 16.
vessels intending to transit the safety have determined that it is consistent
V. Regulatory Analyses zone may be small entities, for the with the fundamental federalism
We developed this rule after reasons stated in section V.A above, this principles and preemption requirements
considering numerous statutes and rule will not have a significant described in Executive Order 13132.
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. economic impact on any vessel owner Also, this rule does not have tribal
Below we summarize our analyses or operator. implications under Executive Order
based on a number of these statutes and 13175, Consultation and Coordination
Under section 213(a) of the Small with Indian Tribal Governments,
Executive Orders, and we discuss First Business Regulatory Enforcement
Amendment rights of protestors. because it does not have a substantial
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), direct effect on one or more Indian
A. Regulatory Planning and Review we want to assist small entities in tribes, on the relationship between the
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 understanding this rule. If the rule Federal Government and Indian tribes,
direct agencies to assess the costs and would affect your small business, or on the distribution of power and
benefits of available regulatory organization, or governmental responsibilities between the Federal
alternatives and, if regulation is jurisdiction and you have questions Government and Indian tribes. If you
necessary, to select regulatory concerning its provisions or options for believe this rule has implications for
approaches that maximize net benefits. compliance, please contact the person federalism or Indian tribes, please
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION contact the person listed in the FOR
importance of quantifying both costs CONTACT section. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
and benefits, of reducing costs, of Under section 213(a) of the Small above.
harmonizing rules, and of promoting Business Regulatory Enforcement E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
flexibility. This rule has not been Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
we want to assist small entities in
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
understanding this rule. If the rule Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed would affect your small business,
by the Office of Management and their discretionary regulatory actions. In
organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
Budget.
We conclude that this rule is not a jurisdiction and you have questions that may result in the expenditure by a
significant regulatory action because we concerning its provisions or options for State, local, or tribal government, in the
anticipate that it will have minimal compliance, please contact the person aggregate, or by the private sector of
impact on the economy, will not listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
interfere with other agencies, will not CONTACT section. more in any one year. Though this rule
adversely alter the budget of any grant Small businesses may send comments will not result in such an expenditure,
or loan recipients, and will not raise any on the actions of Federal employees we do discuss the effects of this rule
novel legal or policy issues. The safety who enforce, or otherwise determine elsewhere in this preamble.
zone created by this rule will be compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
relatively small and is designed to the Small Business and Agriculture
minimize its impact on navigable Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman We have analyzed this rule under
waters. Furthermore, the safety zone has and the Regional Small Business Department of Homeland Security
been designed to allow vessels to transit Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Management Directive 023–01 and
around it. In addition, the safety zone Ombudsman evaluates these actions Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
will have built in times to allow vessels which guide the Coast Guard in
annually and rates each agency’s
to travel through when races are not complying with the National
responsiveness to small business. If you
being held. Thus, restrictions on vessel Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
wish to comment on actions by
movement within that particular area U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
employees of the Coast Guard, call
are expected to be minimal. Under determined that it is one of a category
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). of actions that do not individually or
certain conditions, moreover, vessels The Coast Guard will not retaliate
may still transit through the safety zone cumulatively have a significant effect on
against small entities that question or the human environment. This rule
when permitted by the Captain of the complain about this rule or any policy
Port. establishes a safety zone. It is
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

or action of the Coast Guard. categorically excluded under section
B. Impact on Small Entities 2.B.2, figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g) of the
C. Collection of Information
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Instruction, which pertains to
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, This rule will not call for a new establishment of safety zones. A Record
requires Federal agencies to consider collection of information under the of Environmental Consideration (REC)
the potential impact of regulations on Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 supporting this determination is
small entities during rulemaking. The U.S.C. 3501–3520). available in the docket where indicated

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:08 Jun 30, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM 03JYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 126 / Monday, July 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 30747

in the ADDRESSES section of this (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter Do not submit electronically any
preamble. or operate within the safety zone must information you consider to be
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo Confidential Business Information (CBI)
G. Protest Activities
or his on-scene representative to obtain or other information whose disclosure is
The Coast Guard respects the First permission to do so. The Captain of the restricted by statute. Multimedia
Amendment rights of protesters. Port Buffalo or his on-scene submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
Protesters are asked to contact the representative may be contacted via accompanied by a written comment.
person listed in the FOR FURTHER VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given The written comment is considered the
INFORMATION CONTACT section to permission to enter or operate in the official comment and should include
coordinate protest activities so that your safety zone must comply with all discussion of all points you wish to
message can be received without directions given to them by the Captain make. The EPA will generally not
jeopardizing the safety or security of of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene consider comments or comment
people, places or vessels. representative. contents located outside of the primary
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Dated: June 28, 2017. submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or
J.S. Dufresne,
other file sharing system). For
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
additional submission methods, please
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
contact the person identified in the FOR
requirements, Security measures,
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Waterways. [FR Doc. 2017–13977 Filed 6–30–17; 8:45 am]
For the full EPA public comment policy,
For the reasons discussed in the BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
information about CBI or multimedia
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 submissions, and general guidance on
CFR part 165 as follows: making effective comments, please visit
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
PART 165–REGULATED NAVIGATION AGENCY
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS commenting-epa-dockets.
40 CFR Part 52 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality
continues to read as follows: [EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0025; FRL–9964–26– Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental
Region 1] Protection Agency, EPA New England
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square—
Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05–2), Boston,
No. 0170.1. Reasonably Available Control
MA 02109–3912, tel. 617–918–1584,
Technology for US Watercraft, LLC
■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0331 to read as email Mackintosh.David@epa.gov.
follows: AGENCY: Environmental Protection SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agency (EPA). Throughout this document whenever
§ 165.T09–0331 Safety Zone; Thunder on ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
ACTION: Direct final rule.
the Outer Harbor; Buffalo Outer Harbor,
Buffalo, NY.
EPA.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
(a) Location. This zone will Agency (EPA) is approving a State Table of Contents
encompass all waters of the Buffalo Implementation Plan (SIP) revision I. Background and Purpose
Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY encompassed submitted by the State of Rhode Island. II. Description and Evaluation of the State’s
by all waters of the Outer Harbor, The revision consists of a reasonably Submittal
Buffalo, NY starting at position available control technology (RACT) III. Final Action
42°52′21″ N. and 078°53′14″ W. then approval for a volatile organic IV. Incorporation by Reference
West to 42°52′15″ N. and 078°53′32″ W. compound (VOC) emission source in V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
then South to 42°51′41″ N. and Rhode Island, specifically, US I. Background and Purpose
078°53′02″ W. then East to 42°51′46″ N. Watercraft, LLC. This action is being
and 078°52′45″ W. (NAD 83) then Section 184(b) of the CAA requires
taken in accordance with the Clean Air Rhode Island to implement RACT for all
returning to the point of origin. Act.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will major sources of VOCs and all sources
DATES: This direct final rule will be covered by a Control Techniques
be enforced from 9:45 a.m. until 4:15
effective September 1, 2017, unless EPA Guideline (CTG). The Rhode Island
p.m. on July 22, 2017, and July 23, 2017.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with receives adverse comments by August 2, Department of Environmental
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry 2017. If adverse comments are received, Management (RI DEM) submitted RACT
into, transiting, or anchoring within this EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of Approval File No. 01–05–AP as a SIP
safety zone is prohibited unless the direct final rule in the Federal revision for incorporation into the
authorized by the Captain of the Port Register informing the public that the Rhode Island SIP. RACT Approval File
Buffalo or his designated on-scene rule will not take effect. No. 01–05–AP was originally issued to
representative. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, TPI Composites Incorporated (currently
(2) This safety zone is closed to all identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– owned and operated by US Watercraft,
vessel traffic, except as may be OAR–2017–0025 at https:// LLC) in Warren, Rhode Island. The
permitted by the Captain of the Port www.regulations.gov, or via email to RACT Approval was received by EPA
Buffalo or his designated on-scene Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. For on August 8, 2003, and amended shortly
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

representative. comments submitted at Regulations.gov, thereafter. The amendment was received
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of follow the online instructions for by EPA on February 20, 2004.
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any submitting comments. Once submitted,
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or comments cannot be edited or removed II. Description and Evaluation of the
petty officer who has been designated from Regulations.gov. For either manner State’s Submittal
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act of submission, the EPA may publish any US Watercraft, LLC is located at 373
on his behalf. comment received to its public docket. Market Street, Warren, Rhode Island,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:46 Jun 30, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM 03JYR1

Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:19:51
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:19:51

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 9:45 a.m. on July 22, 2017 until 4:15 p.m. on July 23, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9322, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 30745
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 30745 - Safety Zone; Thunder on the Outer Harbor; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 126 (July 3, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard