82 FR 30814 - Air Plan Approval; FL: Revisions to New Source Review, Definitions and Small Business Assistance Programs
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 126 (July 3, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 126 (July 3, 2017)
| Page Range | 30814-30815 | |
| FR Document | 2017-13861 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 126 (Monday, July 3, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 30814-30815] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-13861] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0166; FRL-9964-34-Region 4] Air Plan Approval; FL: Revisions to New Source Review, Definitions and Small Business Assistance Programs AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve changes to the Florida State Implementation Plan (SIP) to update definitions and make administrative edits to regulations for the Plantwide Applicability Limits and Florida's Small Business Assistance program. EPA is proposing to approve portions of a SIP revision submitted by the State of Florida, through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection on July 1, 2011, to update definitions and make administrative edits to Plantwide Applicability Limits and the Small Business Assistance program. This action is being taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 2, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2012-0166 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or via electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's implementation plan revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. [[Page 30815]] Dated: June 15, 2017. V. Anne Heard, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2017-13861 Filed 6-30-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![30814 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 126 / Monday, July 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
resolved a separate, partial disapproval • does not provide the EPA with the ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
from the EPA’s 2016 rulemaking on discretionary authority to address identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
California’s 2007 and 2014 disproportionate human health or OAR–2012–0166 at http://
infrastructure SIPs. However, we environmental effects with practical, www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
inadvertently did not remove certain appropriate, and legally permissible instructions for submitting comments.
paragraphs from the California SIP that methods under Executive Order 12898 Once submitted, comments cannot be
reflected the earlier disapproval. Thus, (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
as an administrative matter, we intend In addition, the SIP is not approved EPA may publish any comment received
to use this rulemaking to remove the to apply on any Indian reservation land to its public docket. Do not submit
obsolete paragraphs, specifically 40 CFR or in any other area where the EPA or electronically any information you
52.223(i)(7) and 40 CFR 52.223(l)(7), an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
consider to be Confidential Business
from the California SIP. tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Information (CBI) or other information
Indian country, the rule does not have
III. Statutory and Executive Order whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
tribal implications and will not impose
Reviews Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
substantial direct costs on tribal
Under the Clean Air Act, the governments or preempt tribal law as etc.) must be accompanied by a written
Administrator is required to approve a specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 comment. The written comment is
SIP submission that complies with the FR 67249, November 9, 2000). considered the official comment and
provisions of the Act and applicable should include discussion of all points
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 you wish to make. EPA will generally
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP Environmental protection, Air not consider comments or comment
submissions, the EPA’s role is to pollution control, Incorporation by contents located outside of the primary
approve state choices, provided that reference, Intergovernmental relations, submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping other file sharing system). For
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action requirements. additional submission methods, the full
merely proposes to approve state law as Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. EPA public comment policy,
meeting federal requirements and does information about CBI or multimedia
Dated: June 21, 2017.
not impose additional requirements submissions, and general guidance on
beyond those imposed by state law. For Alexis Strauss,
making effective comments, please visit
that reason, this proposed action: Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
[FR Doc. 2017–13860 Filed 6–30–17; 8:45 am]
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory commenting-epa-dockets.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Section, Air Planning and
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
AGENCY Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
40 CFR Part 52 Environmental Protection Agency,
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 [EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0166; FRL–9964–34– Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Region 4] Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers
• is certified as not having a Air Plan Approval; FL: Revisions to
can be reached via telephone at (404)
significant economic impact on a 562–9089 or via electronic mail at
New Source Review, Definitions and
substantial number of small entities akers.brad@epa.gov.
Small Business Assistance Programs
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Final Rules Section of this Federal
• does not contain any unfunded Agency.
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
mandate or significantly or uniquely ACTION:Proposed rule.
affect small governments, as described implementation plan revision as a direct
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection final rule without prior proposal
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Agency (EPA) is taking direct final because the Agency views this as a
• does not have federalism action to approve changes to the Florida noncontroversial submittal and
implications as specified in Executive State Implementation Plan (SIP) to anticipates no adverse comments. A
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, update definitions and make detailed rationale for the approval is set
1999); administrative edits to regulations for forth in the direct final rule. If no
• is not an economically significant the Plantwide Applicability Limits and adverse comments are received in
regulatory action based on health or Florida’s Small Business Assistance response to this rule, no further activity
safety risks subject to Executive Order program. EPA is proposing to approve is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); portions of a SIP revision submitted by comments, the direct final rule will be
• is not a significant regulatory action the State of Florida, through the Florida withdrawn and all public comments
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Department of Environmental Protection received will be addressed in a
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
28355, May 22, 2001); on July 1, 2011, to update definitions subsequent final rule based on this
• is not subject to requirements of and make administrative edits to proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
Section 12(d) of the National Plantwide Applicability Limits and the second comment period on this
Technology Transfer and Advancement Small Business Assistance program. document. Any parties interested in
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because This action is being taken pursuant to commenting on this document should
application of those requirements would the Clean Air Act. do so at this time.
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; DATES: Written comments must be
and received on or before August 2, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Jun 30, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM 03JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_30940/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 126 / Monday, July 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules 30815
Dated: June 15, 2017. comments submitted at Regulations.gov, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
V. Anne Heard, follow the online instructions for Final Rules Section of this Federal
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. submitting comments. Once submitted, Register, EPA is approving the State’s
[FR Doc. 2017–13861 Filed 6–30–17; 8:45 am] comments cannot be edited or removed SIP submittal as a direct final rule
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P from Regulations.gov. For either manner without prior proposal because the
of submission, the EPA may publish any Agency views this as a noncontroversial
comment received to its public docket. submittal and anticipates no adverse
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Do not submit electronically any comments. A detailed rationale for the
AGENCY information you consider to be approval is set forth in the direct final
Confidential Business Information (CBI) rule. If no adverse comments are
40 CFR Part 52 or other information whose disclosure is received in response to this action, no
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0025; FRL–9964–23– restricted by statute. Multimedia further activity is contemplated. If EPA
Region 1] submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
receives adverse comments, the direct
accompanied by a written comment.
Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island; final rule will be withdrawn and all
The written comment is considered the
Reasonably Available Control official comment and should include public comments received will be
Technology for US Watercraft, LLC discussion of all points you wish to addressed in a subsequent final rule
make. The EPA will generally not based on this proposed rule. EPA will
AGENCY: Environmental Protection not institute a second comment period.
Agency (EPA). consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary Any parties interested in commenting
ACTION: Proposed rule. on this action should do so at this time.
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection other file sharing system). For Please note that if EPA receives adverse
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a additional submission methods, please comment on an amendment, paragraph,
State Implementation Plan (SIP) contact the person identified in the FOR or section of this rule and if that
revision submitted by the State of Rhode FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. provision may be severed from the
Island. The revision consists of a For the full EPA public comment policy, remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
reasonably available control technology information about CBI or multimedia as final those provisions of the rule that
approval for a volatile organic submissions, and general guidance on are not the subject of an adverse
compound emission source in Rhode making effective comments, please visit comment.
Island, specifically, US Watercraft, LLC. https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ For additional information, see the
This action is being taken in accordance commenting-epa-dockets. direct final rule which is located in the
with the Clean Air Act. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rules Section of this Federal Register.
DATES: Written comments must be David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality Dated: June 7, 2017.
received on or before August 2, 2017. Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Deborah A. Szaro,
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square— Acting Regional Administrator,EPA New
OAR–2017–0025 at https:// Suite 100 (Mail code OEP05–2), Boston, England.
www.regulations.gov, or via email to MA 02109–3912, tel. 617–918–1584, [FR Doc. 2017–13906 Filed 6–30–17; 8:45 am]
Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. For email Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Jun 30, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM 03JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_30940/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:19:01
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:19:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before August 2, 2017. | |
| Contact | D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 30814 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR