82_FR_30941 82 FR 30815 - Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island; Reasonably Available Control Technology for US Watercraft, LLC

82 FR 30815 - Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island; Reasonably Available Control Technology for US Watercraft, LLC

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 126 (July 3, 2017)

Page Range30815-30815
FR Document2017-13906

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Rhode Island. The revision consists of a reasonably available control technology approval for a volatile organic compound emission source in Rhode Island, specifically, US Watercraft, LLC. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 126 (Monday, July 3, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 126 (Monday, July 3, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30815]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0025; FRL-9964-23-Region 1]


Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island; Reasonably Available Control 
Technology for US Watercraft, LLC

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the 
State of Rhode Island. The revision consists of a reasonably available 
control technology approval for a volatile organic compound emission 
source in Rhode Island, specifically, US Watercraft, LLC. This action 
is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 2, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2017-0025 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full 
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality 
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England 
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100 (Mail code OEP05-2), 
Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. 617-918-1584, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final 
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, 
no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, 
the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments 
received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this 
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any 
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this 
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, 
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions 
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: June 7, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator,EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2017-13906 Filed 6-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                            Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 126 / Monday, July 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                                  30815

                                                    Dated: June 15, 2017.                                 comments submitted at Regulations.gov,                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:       In the
                                                  V. Anne Heard,                                          follow the online instructions for                     Final Rules Section of this Federal
                                                  Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.                submitting comments. Once submitted,                   Register, EPA is approving the State’s
                                                  [FR Doc. 2017–13861 Filed 6–30–17; 8:45 am]             comments cannot be edited or removed                   SIP submittal as a direct final rule
                                                  BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                  from Regulations.gov. For either manner                without prior proposal because the
                                                                                                          of submission, the EPA may publish any                 Agency views this as a noncontroversial
                                                                                                          comment received to its public docket.                 submittal and anticipates no adverse
                                                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                Do not submit electronically any                       comments. A detailed rationale for the
                                                  AGENCY                                                  information you consider to be                         approval is set forth in the direct final
                                                                                                          Confidential Business Information (CBI)                rule. If no adverse comments are
                                                  40 CFR Part 52                                          or other information whose disclosure is               received in response to this action, no
                                                  [EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0025; FRL–9964–23–                    restricted by statute. Multimedia                      further activity is contemplated. If EPA
                                                  Region 1]                                               submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
                                                                                                                                                                 receives adverse comments, the direct
                                                                                                          accompanied by a written comment.
                                                  Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island;                                                                               final rule will be withdrawn and all
                                                                                                          The written comment is considered the
                                                  Reasonably Available Control                            official comment and should include                    public comments received will be
                                                  Technology for US Watercraft, LLC                       discussion of all points you wish to                   addressed in a subsequent final rule
                                                                                                          make. The EPA will generally not                       based on this proposed rule. EPA will
                                                  AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                                                                              not institute a second comment period.
                                                  Agency (EPA).                                           consider comments or comment
                                                                                                          contents located outside of the primary                Any parties interested in commenting
                                                  ACTION: Proposed rule.                                                                                         on this action should do so at this time.
                                                                                                          submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
                                                  SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection                 other file sharing system). For                        Please note that if EPA receives adverse
                                                  Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a                  additional submission methods, please                  comment on an amendment, paragraph,
                                                  State Implementation Plan (SIP)                         contact the person identified in the FOR               or section of this rule and if that
                                                  revision submitted by the State of Rhode                FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.                   provision may be severed from the
                                                  Island. The revision consists of a                      For the full EPA public comment policy,                remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
                                                  reasonably available control technology                 information about CBI or multimedia                    as final those provisions of the rule that
                                                  approval for a volatile organic                         submissions, and general guidance on                   are not the subject of an adverse
                                                  compound emission source in Rhode                       making effective comments, please visit                comment.
                                                  Island, specifically, US Watercraft, LLC.               https://www.epa.gov/dockets/                              For additional information, see the
                                                  This action is being taken in accordance                commenting-epa-dockets.                                direct final rule which is located in the
                                                  with the Clean Air Act.                                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                       Rules Section of this Federal Register.
                                                  DATES: Written comments must be                         David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality                         Dated: June 7, 2017.
                                                  received on or before August 2, 2017.                   Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental
                                                                                                          Protection Agency, EPA New England                     Deborah A. Szaro,
                                                  ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
                                                  identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–                    Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square—                 Acting Regional Administrator,EPA New
                                                  OAR–2017–0025 at https://                               Suite 100 (Mail code OEP05–2), Boston,                 England.
                                                  www.regulations.gov, or via email to                    MA 02109–3912, tel. 617–918–1584,                      [FR Doc. 2017–13906 Filed 6–30–17; 8:45 am]
                                                  Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. For                           email Mackintosh.David@epa.gov.                        BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:50 Jun 30, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00042   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM   03JYP1



Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:19:39
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:19:39
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule.
DatesWritten comments must be received on or before August 2, 2017.
ContactDavid L. Mackintosh, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100 (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. 617-918-1584, email [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 30815 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR