82 FR 31956 - Applications for New Awards; American History and Civics Education-National Activities Grants

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 131 (July 11, 2017)

Page Range		31956-31963
FR Document		2017-14511
The Department of Education is issuing a notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2017 for the American History and Civics Education--National Activities Grants Program, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number 84.422B.
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 131 (Tuesday, July 11, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31956-31963]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; American History and Civics 
Education--National Activities Grants

AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Education is issuing a notice inviting 
applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2017 for the American 
History and Civics Education--National Activities Grants Program, 
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number 84.422B.

DATES: 
    Applications Available: July 11, 2017.
    Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: August 10, 2017.
    Date of Pre-Application Webinars: The Department of Education 
(Department) will host a pre-application webinar to provide technical 
assistance to interested applicants on July 18, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. 
eastern time. To join the webinar please go to the event address at 
https://educateevents.webex.com/educateevents/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0ff2dd5c36144d0f8e4ba71d69d03484.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 21, 2017.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: October 24, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Miller, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W205, Washington, DC 20202-
5960. Or by email: [email protected].
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The American History and Civics Education--
National Activities Grants Program promotes innovative instruction, 
learning strategies, and professional development in American history, 
civics and government, and geography, with an emphasis on activities 
and programs that benefit low-income students and underserved 
populations.
    Background: This competition provides funding to support the 
development, implementation, expansion, evaluation, and dissemination 
of evidence-based instructional approaches and professional development 
activities and programs in American history, civics and government, and 
geography in elementary and secondary schools. This competition 
includes an absolute priority for projects serving high-need students 
to help these students improve learning outcomes for these students. 
This competition includes an absolute priority for projects that show 
potential to improve student achievement in, and teaching of, these 
subjects, and that demonstrate innovation, scalability, accountability, 
and a focus on underserved populations. Additionally, we include a 
competitive preference priority for projects that leverage technology 
to support professional development and instructional practice, which 
may lead to increased student engagement and help accelerate learning.
    This competition also includes a requirement for applicants to 
propose project-specific performance measures and performance targets 
consistent with the objectives of the proposed project. Applications 
must provide information on these measures and targets under 34 CFR 
75.110(b) and (c).
    Priorities: This notice contains one absolute priority and one 
competitive preference priority. In accordance with 34 CFR 
75.105(b)(2)(iv), the absolute priority is from section 2233(b) of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the Every 
Student Succeeds Act (ESEA), 20 U.S.C. 6663. The competitive preference 
priority is from the notice of final supplemental priorities and 
definitions for discretionary grant programs published in the Federal 
Register on December 10, 2014 (79 FR 73425) (Supplemental Priorities).
    Absolute Priority: For FY 2017 and any subsequent year in which we 
make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this 
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority.
    This priority is:
    Absolute Priority 1--Innovative Instruction or Professional 
Development in American History, Civics and Government, and Geography.
    Under this priority, we provide funding to projects that are 
designed to develop, implement, expand, evaluate, and disseminate for 
voluntary use, innovative, evidence-based approaches or professional 
development programs in American history, civics and government, and 
geography. To meet this priority, a project must:
    (i) Show potential to improve the quality of student achievement 
in, and teaching of, American history, civics and government, or 
geography, in elementary schools and secondary schools; and
    (ii) Demonstrate innovation, scalability, accountability, and a 
focus on underserved populations.
    In addressing this priority, a project may include:
    (i) Hands-on civic engagement activities for teachers and students; 
and
    (ii) Programs that educate students about the history and 
principles of the

[[Page 31957]]

Constitution of the United States, including the Bill of Rights.
    Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2017 and any subsequent 
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications 
from this competition, this priority is a competitive preference 
priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to an additional 10 
points to an application that addresses this Competitive Preference 
Priority, depending on how well the application addresses this 
competitive preference priority.
    This priority is:
    Competitive Preference Priority 1-- Leveraging Technology To 
Support Instructional Practice and Professional Development. (up to 10 
points)
    Under this priority, we provide funding to projects that are 
designed to leverage technology through one or more of the following:
    (a) Using high-speed internet access and devices to increase 
students' and educators' access to high-quality accessible digital 
tools, assessments, and materials, particularly Open Educational 
Resources;
    (b) Implementing high-quality accessible digital tools, 
assessments, and materials that are aligned with rigorous college- and 
career-ready standards;
    (c) Implementing high-quality, accessible online courses, online 
learning communities, or online simulations, such as those for which 
educators could earn professional development credit or continuing 
education units through Digital Credentials based on demonstrated 
mastery of competencies and performance-based outcomes, instead of 
traditional time-based metrics; and
    (d) Using data platforms that enable the development, 
visualization, and rapid analysis of data to inform and improve 
learning outcomes, while also protecting privacy in accordance with 
applicable laws.
    Definitions: The following definitions apply to this competition. 
We are establishing the definitions for ``demonstrates a rationale,'' 
``evidence-based,'' ``experimental study,'' ``logic model,'' ``moderate 
evidence,'' ``project component,'' ``promising evidence,'' ``quasi-
experimental design study,'' ``relevant outcome,'' ``strong evidence,'' 
and ``What Works Clearinghouse Handbook'' for the FY 2017 grant 
competition only, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 
U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). The definitions for ``digital credentials'' and 
``open education resources'' are from the Supplemental Priorities. The 
definitions of ``ambitious'' and ``baseline'' are from 34 CFR part 77.
    Ambitious means promoting continued, meaningful improvement for 
program participants or for other individuals or entities affected by 
the grant, or representing a significant advancement in the field of 
education research, practices, or methodologies. When used to describe 
a performance target, whether a performance target is ambitious depends 
upon the context of the relevant performance measure and the baseline 
for that measure.
    Baseline means the starting point from which performance is 
measured and targets are set.
    Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in 
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation 
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve 
relevant outcomes.
    Evidence-based means the proposed project component is supported by 
one or more of strong evidence, moderate evidence, promising evidence, 
or evidence that demonstrates a rationale.
    Digital credentials means evidence of mastery of specific 
competencies or performance-based abilities, provided in digital rather 
than physical medium (such as through digital badges). These digital 
credentials may then be used to supplement or satisfy continuing 
education or professional development requirements.
    Experimental study means a study that is designed to compare 
outcomes between two groups of individuals (such as students) that are 
otherwise equivalent except for their assignment to either a treatment 
group receiving a project component or a control group that does not. 
Randomized controlled trials, regression discontinuity design studies, 
and single-case design studies are the specific types of experimental 
studies that, depending on their design and implementation (e.g., 
sample attrition in randomized controlled trials and regression 
discontinuity design studies), can meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) 
standards without reservations as described in the WWC Handbook 
(incorporated by reference, see 34 CFR 77.2):
    A. A randomized controlled trial employs random assignment of, for 
example, students, teachers, classrooms, or schools to receive the 
project component being evaluated (the treatment group) or not to 
receive the project component (the control group).
    B. A regression discontinuity design study assigns the project 
component being evaluated using a measured variable (e.g., assigning 
students reading below a cutoff score to tutoring or developmental 
education classes) and controls for that variable in the analysis of 
outcomes.
    C. A single-case design study uses observations of a single case 
(e.g., a student eligible for a behavioral intervention) over time in 
the absence and presence of a controlled treatment manipulation to 
determine whether the outcome is systematically related to the 
treatment.
    Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a 
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed 
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be 
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the 
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project 
components and relevant outcomes.
    Moderate evidence means that there is evidence of effectiveness of 
a key project component in improving a relevant outcome for a sample 
that overlaps with the populations or settings proposed to receive that 
component, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
    (a) A practice guide prepared by the WWC using version 2.1 or 3.0 
of the WWC Handbook reporting a ``strong evidence base'' or ``moderate 
evidence base'' for the corresponding practice guide recommendation;
    (b) An intervention report prepared by the WWC using version 2.1 or 
3.0 of the WWC Handbook reporting a ``positive effect'' or 
``potentially positive effect'' on a relevant outcome based on a 
``medium to large'' extent of evidence, with no reporting of a 
``negative effect'' or ``potentially negative effect'' on a relevant 
outcome; or
    (c) A single experimental study or quasi-experimental design study 
reviewed and reported by the WWC using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the WWC 
Handbook, or otherwise assessed by the Department using version 3.0 of 
the WWC Handbook, as appropriate, and that--
    (i) Meets WWC standards with or without reservations;
    (ii) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive 
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome;
    (iii) Includes no overriding statistically significant and negative 
effects on relevant outcomes reported in the study or in a 
corresponding WWC intervention report prepared under version 2.1 or 3.0 
of the WWC Handbook; and
    (iv) Is based on a sample from more than one site (e.g., State, 
county, city, school district, or postsecondary campus) and includes at 
least 350 students or other individuals across

[[Page 31958]]

sites. Multiple studies of the same project component that each meet 
requirements (i), (ii), and (iii) may together satisfy this 
requirement.
    Open educational resources means teaching, learning, and research 
resources that reside in the public domain or have been released under 
an intellectual property license that permits their free use and 
repurposing by others.
    Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, 
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence 
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of 
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices 
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
    Promising evidence means that there is evidence of the 
effectiveness of a key project component in improving a relevant 
outcome, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
    (a) A practice guide prepared by WWC reporting a ``strong evidence 
base'' or ``moderate evidence base'' for the corresponding practice 
guide recommendation;
    (b) An intervention report prepared by the WWC reporting a 
``positive effect'' or ``potentially positive effect'' on a relevant 
outcome with no reporting of a ``negative effect'' or ``potentially 
negative effect'' on a relevant outcome; or
    (c) A single study assessed by the Department, as appropriate, 
that--
    (i) Is an experimental study, a quasi-experimental design study, or 
a well-designed and well-implemented correlational study with 
statistical controls for selection bias (e.g., a study using regression 
methods to account for differences between a treatment group and a 
comparison group); and
    (ii) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive 
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome.
    Quasi-experimental design study means a study using a design that 
attempts to approximate an experimental study by identifying a 
comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in important 
respects. This type of study, depending on design and implementation 
(e.g., establishment of baseline equivalence of the groups being 
compared), can meet WWC standards with reservations, but cannot meet 
WWC standards without reservations, as described in the WWC Handbook.
    Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) 
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the 
specific goals of the program.
    Strong evidence means that there is evidence of the effectiveness 
of a key project component in improving a relevant outcome for a sample 
that overlaps with the populations and settings proposed to receive 
that component, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
    (a) A practice guide prepared by the WWC using version 2.1 or 3.0 
of the WWC Handbook reporting a ``strong evidence base'' for the 
corresponding practice guide recommendation;
    (b) An intervention report prepared by the WWC using version 2.1 or 
3.0 of the WWC Handbook reporting a ``positive effect'' on a relevant 
outcome based on a ``medium to large'' extent of evidence, with no 
reporting of a ``negative effect'' or ``potentially negative effect'' 
on a relevant outcome; or
    (c) A single experimental study reviewed and reported by the WWC 
using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the WWC Handbook, or otherwise assessed by 
the Department using version 3.0 of the WWC Handbook, as appropriate, 
and that--
    (i) Meets WWC standards without reservations;
    (ii) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive 
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome;
    (iii) Includes no overriding statistically significant and negative 
effects on relevant outcomes reported in the study or in a 
corresponding WWC intervention report prepared under version 2.1 or 3.0 
of the WWC Handbook; and
    (iv) Is based on a sample from more than one site (e.g., State, 
county, city, school district, or postsecondary campus) and includes at 
least 350 students or other individuals across sites. Multiple studies 
of the same project component that each meet requirements (i), (ii), 
and (iii) may together satisfy this requirement.
    What Works Clearinghouse Handbook means the standards and 
procedures set forth in the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook, 
Version 3.0, March 2014, or Version 2.1, September 2011, which can be 
found at the following link: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks 
(incorporated by reference, see 34 CFR 77.2). Study findings eligible 
for review under WWC standards can meet WWC standards without 
reservations, meet WWC standards with reservations, or not meet WWC 
standards. WWC practice guides and intervention reports include 
findings from systematic reviews of evidence as described in the 
Handbook documentation.
    Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure 
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties 
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, definitions, and 
other requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the 
Secretary to exempt from rulemaking requirements, regulations governing 
the first grant competition under a new or substantially revised 
program authority. This grant competition is the first for the American 
History and Civics National Activities program under 20 U.S.C. 6663 and 
therefore qualifies for this exemption. In order to ensure timely grant 
awards, the Secretary has decided to forgo public comment on the 
definitions under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These definitions will 
apply to the FY 2017 grant competition only.
    Program Authority: Section 2233 of the ESEA.
    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to 
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department 
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3474. (d) The Secretary's Supplemental Priorities published in the 
Federal Register on December 10, 2014 (79 FR 73425).

    Note:  The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions 
of higher education only.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
    Estimated Available Funds: $1,700,000.
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from 
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
    Estimated Range of Awards: $200,000-$700,000 per year.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: $500,000 per year.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 2-7.

    Note:  The Department is not bound by any estimates in this 
notice.

    Project Period: Up to three years, with renewal of up two 
additional years if the grantee demonstrates to the Secretary that the 
grantee is effectively using funds.

[[Page 31959]]

III. Eligibility Information

    1. Eligible Applicants: An institution of higher education or other 
nonprofit or for-profit organization with demonstrated expertise in the 
development of evidence-based approaches with the potential to improve 
the quality of American history, civics and government, or geography 
learning and teaching.

    Note:  If multiple eligible entities wish to form a consortium 
and jointly submit a single application, they must follow the 
procedures for group applications described in 34 CFR 75.127 through 
34 CFR 75.129.

    2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require any 
cost sharing or matching.
    b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. In accordance with section 2301 of the 
ESEA, funds made available under this program must be used to 
supplement, and not supplant, other Federal, State, and local funds 
that would otherwise be expended to carry out activities under this 
program.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Address to Request Application Package: Christine Miller, U.S. 
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W205, 
Washington, DC 20202-5970. Telephone: (202) 260-7350 or by email: 
[email protected].
    If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-
8339.
    Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application 
package in an accessible format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, 
or compact disc) by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.
    2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements 
concerning the content and form of an application, together with the 
forms you must submit, are in the application package for this 
competition.
    The Department will be able to develop a more efficient process for 
reviewing grant applications if it has a better understanding of the 
number of entities that intend to apply for funding under this 
competition. Therefore, the Secretary strongly encourages each 
potential applicant to notify the Department by sending a short email 
message indicating the applicant's intent to submit an application for 
funding. The email need not include information regarding the content 
of the proposed application, only the applicant's intent to submit it. 
You should send this email notification to: [email protected]. 
Applicants that do not provide this email notification may still apply 
for funding.
    Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application) 
is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that 
reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) 
limit the application narrative to no more than 50 pages, and (2) use 
the following standards:
     A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' 
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
     Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) 
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, 
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in 
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
     Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller 
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.
    The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover 
sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget 
justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-
page abstract, the resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of 
support. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of the 
application narrative.
    b. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of 
projects that may be proposed in applications for the American History 
and Civics Education--National Activities Grants Program, your 
application may include business information that you consider 
proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' and 
describe the process we use in determining whether any of that 
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under 
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as 
amended).
    Because we plan to post the project narrative section of funded 
American History and Civics Education--National Activities Grants 
Program applications on our Web site, you may wish to request 
confidentiality of business information.
    Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your 
application any information that you feel is exempt from disclosure 
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your 
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page 
number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional 
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
    3. Submission Dates and Times:
    Applications Available: July 11, 2017.
    Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: August 10, 2017.
    Date of Pre-Application Webinars: July 18, 2017.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 21, 2017.
    Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted 
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For 
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your 
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery 
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, please refer to Other Submission Requirements in section 
IV of this notice.
    We do not consider an application that does not comply with the 
deadline requirements.
    Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or 
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact 
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. If the 
Department provides an accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual 
with a disability in connection with the application process, the 
individual's application remains subject to all other requirements and 
limitations in this notice. Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: 
October 24, 2017.
    4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive 
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about 
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order 
12372 is in the application package for this program.
    5. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 2 CFR 200, 
subpart E. We reference regulations outlining funding restrictions in 
the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
    6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification 
Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the 
Department of Education, you must--
    a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a 
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
    b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award 
Management (SAM), the Government's primary registrant database;
    c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
    d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information 
while your application is under review

[[Page 31960]]

by the Department and, if you are awarded a grant, during the project 
period.
    You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet at the 
following Web site: http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. A DUNS number can be 
created within one to two business days.
    If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or 
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service. 
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal 
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a 
new TIN, please allow two to five weeks for your TIN to become active.
    The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business 
days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the 
completeness and accuracy of the data you enter into the SAM database. 
Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal financial 
assistance under a program administered by the Department, please allow 
sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number and TIN. We 
strongly recommend that you register early.

    Note: Once your SAM registration is active, it may be 24 to 48 
hours before you can access the information in, and submit an 
application through, Grants.gov.

    If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make 
any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with 
your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update 
your registration annually. This may take three or more business days.
    Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further 
assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in 
SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov 
Tip Sheet, which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
    In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov, 
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized 
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with 
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the 
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html.
    7. Other Submission Requirements:
    Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted 
electronically unless you qualify for an exception to this requirement 
in accordance with the instructions in this section.
    a. Electronic Submission of Applications. Applications for grants 
under the American History and Civics Education--National Activities 
Grants Program, CFDA number 84.422B, must be submitted electronically 
using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at www.Grants.gov. 
Through this site, you will be able to download a copy of the 
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit 
your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant 
application to us.
    Further information regarding calculation of the date that is two 
weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in this 
section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
    You may access the electronic grant application for the American 
History and Civics Education_National Activities Grants Program at 
www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable application 
package for this competition by the CFDA number. Do not include the 
CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.422, not 
84.422B).
    Please note the following:
     When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find 
information about submitting an application electronically through the 
site, as well as the hours of operation.
     Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time 
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must 
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00 
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as 
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if 
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov 
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application 
deadline date.
     The amount of time it can take to upload an application 
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the 
application and the speed of your internet connection. Therefore, we 
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline 
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
     You should review and follow the Education Submission 
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are 
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that 
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov 
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures 
pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5 
system home page at www.G5.gov. In addition, for specific guidance and 
procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov, please 
refer to the Grants.gov Web site at: www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/apply-for-grants.html.
     You will not receive additional point value because you 
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you 
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your 
application in paper format.
     You must submit all documents electronically, including 
all information you typically provide on the following forms: The 
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of 
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and 
certifications.
     You must upload any narrative sections and all other 
attachments to your application as files in a read-only, flattened 
Portable Document Format (PDF), meaning any fillable PDF documents must 
be saved as flattened non-fillable files. Therefore, do not upload an 
interactive or fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than 
a read-only, flattened PDF (e.g., Word, Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or 
submit a password-protected file, we will not review that material. 
Please note that this could result in your application not being 
considered for funding because the material in question--for example, 
the application narrative--is critical to a meaningful review of your 
proposal. For that reason it is important to allow yourself adequate 
time to upload all material as PDF files. The Department will not 
convert material from other formats to PDF. There is no need to 
password protect a file in order to meet the requirement to submit a 
read-only flattened PDF. And, as noted above, the Department will not 
review password-protected files.
     After you electronically submit your application, you will 
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that 
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. This notification indicates 
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department. Grants.gov 
will also notify you automatically by email if your application met all 
the Grants.gov validation requirements or if there were any errors 
(such as submission of your application by someone other than a 
registered Authorized Organization Representative, or inclusion of an 
attachment with a file name that contains special characters). You will 
be given an opportunity to correct any

[[Page 31961]]

errors and resubmit, but you must still meet the deadline for 
submission of applications.
    Once your application is successfully validated by Grants.gov, the 
Department will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send you 
an email with a unique PR/Award number for your application.
    These emails do not mean that your application is without any 
disqualifying errors. While your application may have been successfully 
validated by Grants.gov, it must also meet the Department's application 
requirements as specified in this notice and in the application 
instructions. Disqualifying errors could include, for instance, failure 
to submit a required part of the application; or failure to meet 
applicant eligibility requirements. It is your responsibility to ensure 
that your submitted application has met all of the Department's 
requirements.
     We may request that you provide us original signatures on 
forms at a later date.
    Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues 
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting 
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov 
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a 
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
    If you are prevented from electronically submitting your 
application on the application deadline date because of technical 
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension 
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to 
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand 
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing 
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
    If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC 
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and provide an explanation 
of the technical problem you experienced with Grants.gov, along with 
the Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number. We will accept your 
application if we can confirm that a technical problem occurred with 
the Grants.gov system and that the problem affected your ability to 
submit your application by 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the 
application deadline date. We will contact you after we determine 
whether your application will be accepted.

    Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply 
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the 
Grants.gov system.

    Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an 
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your 
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application 
through the Grants.gov system because--
     You do not have access to the internet; or
     You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to 
the Grants.gov system; and
     No later than two weeks before the application deadline 
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the 
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business 
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement 
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception 
prevents you from using the internet to submit your application.
    If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be 
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline 
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must 
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the 
application deadline date.
    Address and mail or fax your statement to: Christine Miller, U.S. 
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W205, 
Washington, DC 20202-5960. FAX: (202) 205-5630.
    Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the 
mail or hand-delivery instructions described in this notice.
    b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
    If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a 
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail 
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the 
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address: 
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: 
(CFDA Number 84.422B), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
    You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
    (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
    (2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the 
U.S. Postal Service.
    (3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial 
carrier.
    (4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the 
U.S. Department of Education.
    If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do 
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
    (1) A private metered postmark.
    (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.

    Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated 
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your 
local post office.

    c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
    If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission 
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper 
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original 
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the 
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address: 
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: 
(CFDA Number 84.422B), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center 
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
    The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily 
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except 
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.

    Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications:  If you 
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
    (1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by 
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including 
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are 
submitting your application; and
    (2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a 
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not 
receive this notification within 15 business days from the 
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of 
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are 
from 34 CFR 75.210. An applicant may earn up to a total of 100 points 
based on the selection criteria. The maximum score for addressing each 
criterion is indicated in parentheses.
    A. Quality of the Project Design. (35 points) The Secretary 
considers the quality of the design of the proposed project. In 
determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the 
Secretary considers the following factors--
    (i) The extent to which the proposed project represents an 
exceptional

[[Page 31962]]

approach to the priority or priorities established for the competition.
    (ii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the 
proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for 
maximizing the effectiveness of project services.
    (iii) The extent to which the design of the proposed project 
reflects up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice.
    B. Significance. (20 points) The Secretary considers the 
significance of the proposed project. In determining the significance 
of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to build 
local capacity to provide, improve, or expand services that address the 
needs of the target population.
    (ii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely 
to be attained by the proposed project, especially improvements in 
teaching and student achievement.
    (iii) The extent to which the results of the proposed project are 
to be disseminated in ways that will enable others to use the 
information or strategies.
    C. Quality of the Management Plan. (20 points) The Secretary 
considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project. 
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives 
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly 
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing 
project tasks.
    (ii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project 
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are 
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed 
project.
    D. Quality of the Project Evaluation. (25 points) The Secretary 
considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed 
project. In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use 
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the 
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and 
qualitative data to the extent possible.
    (ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide 
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward 
achieving intended outcomes.
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants 
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, 
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past 
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as 
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or 
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil 
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities 
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education 
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    3. Risk Assessment and Special Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 
200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department 
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 
3474.10, the Secretary may impose special conditions and, in 
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the 
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of 
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system 
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not 
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not 
responsible.
    4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this 
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project 
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently 
$150,000) under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your 
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal 
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make 
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that 
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as 
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
(FAPIIS)), accessible through SAM. You may review and comment on any 
information about yourself that a Federal agency previously entered and 
that is currently in FAPIIS.
    Please note that, if the total value of your currently active 
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the 
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity 
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal 
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the 
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual 
performance report that provides the most current performance and 
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance 
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, 
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    (c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee 
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In 
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
    4. Performance Measures: (a) The Department has established the 
following Government Performance and

[[Page 31963]]

Results Act of 1993 performance objective for the American History and 
Civics Education--National Activities Grants Program:
    Participants will demonstrate through pre- and post-assessments an 
increased understanding of American history, civics and government, and 
geography.
    We will track performance on this objective through the following 
measure:
    The average percentage gains on an assessment after participation 
in the grant activities.
    We advise an applicant for a grant under this program to give 
careful consideration to this measure in conceptualizing the approach 
and evaluation of its proposed project. Each grantee will be required 
to provide, in its annual and final performance reports, data about its 
performance with respect to this measure.
    (b) Project-Specific Performance Measures. Applicants must propose 
project-specific performance measures and performance targets 
consistent with the objectives of the proposed project. Applications 
must provide the following information as directed under 34 CFR 
75.110(b) and (c):
    (1) Performance measures. How each proposed performance measure 
would accurately measure the performance of the project and how the 
proposed performance measure would be consistent with the performance 
measures established for the program funding the competition.
    (2) Baseline data. (i) Why each proposed baseline is valid; or (ii) 
if the applicant has determined that there are no established baseline 
data for a particular performance measure, an explanation of why there 
is no established baseline and of how and when, during the project 
period, the applicant would establish a valid baseline for the 
performance measure.
    (3) Performance targets. Why each proposed performance target is 
ambitious yet achievable compared to the baseline for the performance 
measure and when, during the project period, the applicant would meet 
the performance target(s).
    (4) Data collection and reporting. (i) The data collection and 
reporting methods the applicant would use and why those methods are 
likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data; and 
(ii) the applicant's capacity to collect and report reliable, valid, 
and meaningful performance data, as evidenced by high-quality data 
collection, analysis, and reporting in other projects or research.
    All grantees must submit an annual performance report with 
information that is responsive to these performance measures.
    5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee 
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is 
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the 
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the 
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
    In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers 
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in 
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil 
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities 
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

VII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this 
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format 
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to 
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free 
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the 
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System 
at: www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well 
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal 
Register, in text or PDF. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat 
Reader, which is available free at the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at: 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

    Dated: July 6, 2017.
Margo Anderson,
Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2017-14511 Filed 7-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 11, 2017 / Notices 31957

Constitution of the United States, ‘‘ambitious’’ and ‘‘baseline’’ are from 34 developmental education classes) and
including the Bill of Rights. CFR part 77. controls for that variable in the analysis
Competitive Preference Priorities: For Ambitious means promoting of outcomes.
FY 2017 and any subsequent year in continued, meaningful improvement for C. A single-case design study uses
which we make awards from the list of program participants or for other observations of a single case (e.g., a
unfunded applications from this individuals or entities affected by the student eligible for a behavioral
competition, this priority is a grant, or representing a significant intervention) over time in the absence
competitive preference priority. Under advancement in the field of education and presence of a controlled treatment
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to research, practices, or methodologies. manipulation to determine whether the
an additional 10 points to an When used to describe a performance outcome is systematically related to the
application that addresses this target, whether a performance target is treatment.
Competitive Preference Priority, ambitious depends upon the context of Logic model (also referred to as a
depending on how well the application the relevant performance measure and theory of action) means a framework
addresses this competitive preference the baseline for that measure. that identifies key project components
priority. Baseline means the starting point of the proposed project (i.e., the active
This priority is: from which performance is measured ‘‘ingredients’’ that are hypothesized to
Competitive Preference Priority 1— and targets are set. be critical to achieving the relevant
Leveraging Technology To Support Demonstrates a rationale means a key outcomes) and describes the theoretical
Instructional Practice and Professional project component included in the and operational relationships among the
Development. (up to 10 points) project’s logic model is informed by key project components and relevant
Under this priority, we provide research or evaluation findings that outcomes.
funding to projects that are designed to suggest the project component is likely Moderate evidence means that there is
leverage technology through one or to improve relevant outcomes. evidence of effectiveness of a key
more of the following: Evidence-based means the proposed project component in improving a
(a) Using high-speed internet access project component is supported by one relevant outcome for a sample that
and devices to increase students’ and or more of strong evidence, moderate overlaps with the populations or
educators’ access to high-quality evidence, promising evidence, or settings proposed to receive that
accessible digital tools, assessments, evidence that demonstrates a rationale. component, based on a relevant finding
and materials, particularly Open Digital credentials means evidence of from one of the following:
Educational Resources; mastery of specific competencies or (a) A practice guide prepared by the
(b) Implementing high-quality performance-based abilities, provided in WWC using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the
accessible digital tools, assessments, digital rather than physical medium WWC Handbook reporting a ‘‘strong
and materials that are aligned with (such as through digital badges). These evidence base’’ or ‘‘moderate evidence
rigorous college- and career-ready digital credentials may then be used to base’’ for the corresponding practice
standards; supplement or satisfy continuing guide recommendation;
(c) Implementing high-quality, education or professional development (b) An intervention report prepared by
accessible online courses, online requirements. the WWC using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the
learning communities, or online Experimental study means a study WWC Handbook reporting a ‘‘positive
simulations, such as those for which that is designed to compare outcomes effect’’ or ‘‘potentially positive effect’’
educators could earn professional between two groups of individuals on a relevant outcome based on a
development credit or continuing (such as students) that are otherwise ‘‘medium to large’’ extent of evidence,
education units through Digital equivalent except for their assignment with no reporting of a ‘‘negative effect’’
Credentials based on demonstrated to either a treatment group receiving a or ‘‘potentially negative effect’’ on a
mastery of competencies and project component or a control group relevant outcome; or
performance-based outcomes, instead of that does not. Randomized controlled (c) A single experimental study or
traditional time-based metrics; and trials, regression discontinuity design quasi-experimental design study
(d) Using data platforms that enable studies, and single-case design studies reviewed and reported by the WWC
the development, visualization, and are the specific types of experimental using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the WWC
rapid analysis of data to inform and studies that, depending on their design Handbook, or otherwise assessed by the
improve learning outcomes, while also and implementation (e.g., sample Department using version 3.0 of the
protecting privacy in accordance with attrition in randomized controlled trials WWC Handbook, as appropriate, and
applicable laws. and regression discontinuity design that—
Definitions: The following definitions studies), can meet What Works (i) Meets WWC standards with or
apply to this competition. We are Clearinghouse (WWC) standards without reservations;
establishing the definitions for without reservations as described in the (ii) Includes at least one statistically
‘‘demonstrates a rationale,’’ ‘‘evidence- WWC Handbook (incorporated by significant and positive (i.e., favorable)
based,’’ ‘‘experimental study,’’ ‘‘logic reference, see 34 CFR 77.2): effect on a relevant outcome;
model,’’ ‘‘moderate evidence,’’ ‘‘project A. A randomized controlled trial (iii) Includes no overriding
component,’’ ‘‘promising evidence,’’ employs random assignment of, for statistically significant and negative
‘‘quasi-experimental design study,’’ example, students, teachers, classrooms, effects on relevant outcomes reported in
‘‘relevant outcome,’’ ‘‘strong evidence,’’ or schools to receive the project the study or in a corresponding WWC
and ‘‘What Works Clearinghouse component being evaluated (the intervention report prepared under
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

Handbook’’ for the FY 2017 grant treatment group) or not to receive the version 2.1 or 3.0 of the WWC
competition only, in accordance with project component (the control group). Handbook; and
section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. B. A regression discontinuity design (iv) Is based on a sample from more
1232(d)(1). The definitions for ‘‘digital study assigns the project component than one site (e.g., State, county, city,
credentials’’ and ‘‘open education being evaluated using a measured school district, or postsecondary
resources’’ are from the Supplemental variable (e.g., assigning students reading campus) and includes at least 350
Priorities. The definitions of below a cutoff score to tutoring or students or other individuals across

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jul 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1
31958 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 11, 2017 / Notices

sites. Multiple studies of the same Strong evidence means that there is (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally
project component that each meet evidence of the effectiveness of a key offers interested parties the opportunity
requirements (i), (ii), and (iii) may project component in improving a to comment on proposed priorities,
together satisfy this requirement. relevant outcome for a sample that definitions, and other requirements.
Open educational resources means overlaps with the populations and Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however,
teaching, learning, and research settings proposed to receive that allows the Secretary to exempt from
resources that reside in the public component, based on a relevant finding rulemaking requirements, regulations
domain or have been released under an from one of the following: governing the first grant competition
intellectual property license that (a) A practice guide prepared by the under a new or substantially revised
permits their free use and repurposing WWC using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the program authority. This grant
by others. WWC Handbook reporting a ‘‘strong competition is the first for the American
Project component means an activity, evidence base’’ for the corresponding History and Civics National Activities
strategy, intervention, process, product, practice guide recommendation; program under 20 U.S.C. 6663 and
practice, or policy included in a project. (b) An intervention report prepared by therefore qualifies for this exemption. In
Evidence may pertain to an individual the WWC using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the order to ensure timely grant awards, the
project component or to a combination WWC Handbook reporting a ‘‘positive Secretary has decided to forgo public
of project components (e.g., training effect’’ on a relevant outcome based on comment on the definitions under
teachers on instructional practices for a ‘‘medium to large’’ extent of evidence, section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These
English learners and follow-on coaching with no reporting of a ‘‘negative effect’’ definitions will apply to the FY 2017
for these teachers). or ‘‘potentially negative effect’’ on a grant competition only.
Promising evidence means that there relevant outcome; or Program Authority: Section 2233 of
is evidence of the effectiveness of a key (c) A single experimental study the ESEA.
project component in improving a reviewed and reported by the WWC Applicable Regulations: (a) The
relevant outcome, based on a relevant using version 2.1 or 3.0 of the WWC Education Department General
finding from one of the following: Handbook, or otherwise assessed by the Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
(a) A practice guide prepared by Department using version 3.0 of the parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98,
WWC reporting a ‘‘strong evidence WWC Handbook, as appropriate, and and 99. (b) The Office of Management
base’’ or ‘‘moderate evidence base’’ for that— and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
the corresponding practice guide (i) Meets WWC standards without
Governmentwide Debarment and
recommendation; reservations;
Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR
(b) An intervention report prepared by (ii) Includes at least one statistically
part 180, as adopted and amended as
the WWC reporting a ‘‘positive effect’’ significant and positive (i.e., favorable)
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
or ‘‘potentially positive effect’’ on a effect on a relevant outcome;
(iii) Includes no overriding part 3485. (c) The Uniform
relevant outcome with no reporting of a Administrative Requirements, Cost
‘‘negative effect’’ or ‘‘potentially statistically significant and negative
effects on relevant outcomes reported in Principles, and Audit Requirements for
negative effect’’ on a relevant outcome; Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as
or the study or in a corresponding WWC
intervention report prepared under adopted and amended as regulations of
(c) A single study assessed by the
version 2.1 or 3.0 of the WWC the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d)
Department, as appropriate, that—
(i) Is an experimental study, a quasi- Handbook; and The Secretary’s Supplemental Priorities
experimental design study, or a well- (iv) Is based on a sample from more published in the Federal Register on
designed and well-implemented than one site (e.g., State, county, city, December 10, 2014 (79 FR 73425).
correlational study with statistical school district, or postsecondary Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
controls for selection bias (e.g., a study campus) and includes at least 350 apply to institutions of higher education
using regression methods to account for students or other individuals across only.
differences between a treatment group sites. Multiple studies of the same
and a comparison group); and project component that each meet II. Award Information
(ii) Includes at least one statistically requirements (i), (ii), and (iii) may Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
significant and positive (i.e., favorable) together satisfy this requirement. Estimated Available Funds:
effect on a relevant outcome. What Works Clearinghouse Handbook $1,700,000.
Quasi-experimental design study means the standards and procedures set Contingent upon the availability of
means a study using a design that forth in the WWC Procedures and funds and the quality of applications,
attempts to approximate an Standards Handbook, Version 3.0, we may make additional awards in
experimental study by identifying a March 2014, or Version 2.1, September subsequent years from the list of
comparison group that is similar to the 2011, which can be found at the unfunded applications from this
treatment group in important respects. following link: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/ competition.
This type of study, depending on design wwc/Handbooks (incorporated by Estimated Range of Awards:
and implementation (e.g., establishment reference, see 34 CFR 77.2). Study $200,000–$700,000 per year.
of baseline equivalence of the groups findings eligible for review under WWC Estimated Average Size of Awards:
being compared), can meet WWC standards can meet WWC standards $500,000 per year.
standards with reservations, but cannot without reservations, meet WWC Estimated Number of Awards: 2–7.
meet WWC standards without standards with reservations, or not meet
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

reservations, as described in the WWC WWC standards. WWC practice guides Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Handbook. and intervention reports include
Relevant outcome means the student findings from systematic reviews of Project Period: Up to three years, with
outcome(s) or other outcome(s) the key evidence as described in the Handbook renewal of up two additional years if the
project component is designed to documentation. grantee demonstrates to the Secretary
improve, consistent with the specific Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: that the grantee is effectively using
goals of the program. Under the Administrative Procedure Act funds.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jul 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 11, 2017 / Notices 31959

III. Eligibility Information Christine.Miller@ed.gov. Applicants that For additional information please see 34
1. Eligible Applicants: An institution do not provide this email notification CFR 5.11(c).
of higher education or other nonprofit or may still apply for funding. 3. Submission Dates and Times:
Page Limit: The application narrative Applications Available: July 11, 2017.
for-profit organization with
(Part III of the application) is where you, Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
demonstrated expertise in the
the applicant, address the selection August 10, 2017.
development of evidence-based Date of Pre-Application Webinars:
approaches with the potential to criteria that reviewers use to evaluate
your application. We recommend that July 18, 2017.
improve the quality of American Deadline for Transmittal of
history, civics and government, or you (1) limit the application narrative to
no more than 50 pages, and (2) use the Applications: August 21, 2017.
geography learning and teaching. Applications for grants under this
following standards:
Note: If multiple eligible entities wish to
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side competition must be submitted
form a consortium and jointly submit a single electronically using the Grants.gov
application, they must follow the procedures only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides. Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
for group applications described in 34 CFR (including dates and times) about how
75.127 through 34 CFR 75.129. • Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the to submit your application
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This electronically, or in paper format by
application narrative, including titles,
program does not require any cost mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
headings, footnotes, quotations,
sharing or matching. an exception to the electronic
references, and captions, as well as all
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This submission requirement, please refer to
text in charts, tables, figures, and
program involves supplement-not- Other Submission Requirements in
graphs.
supplant funding requirements. In section IV of this notice.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
accordance with section 2301 of the We do not consider an application
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
ESEA, funds made available under this that does not comply with the deadline
(characters per inch).
program must be used to supplement, requirements.
and not supplant, other Federal, State, • Use one of the following fonts: Individuals with disabilities who
and local funds that would otherwise be Times New Roman, Courier, Courier need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
expended to carry out activities under New, or Arial. in connection with the application
this program. The recommended page limit does not process should contact the person listed
apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II, under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
IV. Application and Submission the budget section, including the CONTACT. If the Department provides an
Information narrative budget justification; Part IV, accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
1. Address to Request Application the assurances and certifications; or the individual with a disability in
Package: Christine Miller, U.S. one-page abstract, the resumes, the connection with the application
Department of Education, 400 Maryland bibliography, or the letters of support. process, the individual’s application
Avenue SW., Room 4W205, However, the recommended page limit remains subject to all other
Washington, DC 20202–5970. does apply to all of the application requirements and limitations in this
Telephone: (202) 260–7350 or by email: narrative. notice. Deadline for Intergovernmental
Christine.Miller@ed.gov. b. Submission of Proprietary Review: October 24, 2017.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the Information: Given the types of projects 4. Intergovernmental Review: This
FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339. that may be proposed in applications for program is subject to Executive Order
Individuals with disabilities can the American History and Civics 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
obtain a copy of the application package Education—National Activities Grants part 79. Information about
in an accessible format (e.g., Braille, Program, your application may include Intergovernmental Review of Federal
large print, audiotape, or compact disc) business information that you consider Programs under Executive Order 12372
by contacting the person listed under proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define is in the application package for this
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. ‘‘business information’’ and describe the program.
2. Content and Form of Application process we use in determining whether 5. Funding Restrictions: We specify
Submission: Requirements concerning any of that information is proprietary unallowable costs in 2 CFR 200, subpart
the content and form of an application, and, thus, protected from disclosure E. We reference regulations outlining
together with the forms you must under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of funding restrictions in the Applicable
submit, are in the application package Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as Regulations section of this notice.
for this competition. amended). 6. Data Universal Numbering System
The Department will be able to Because we plan to post the project Number, Taxpayer Identification
develop a more efficient process for narrative section of funded American Number, and System for Award
reviewing grant applications if it has a History and Civics Education—National Management: To do business with the
better understanding of the number of Activities Grants Program applications Department of Education, you must—
entities that intend to apply for funding on our Web site, you may wish to a. Have a Data Universal Numbering
under this competition. Therefore, the request confidentiality of business System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Secretary strongly encourages each information. Identification Number (TIN);
potential applicant to notify the Consistent with Executive Order b. Register both your DUNS number
Department by sending a short email 12600, please designate in your and TIN with the System for Award
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

message indicating the applicant’s application any information that you Management (SAM), the Government’s
intent to submit an application for feel is exempt from disclosure under primary registrant database;
funding. The email need not include Exemption 4. In the appropriate c. Provide your DUNS number and
information regarding the content of the Appendix section of your application, TIN on your application; and
proposed application, only the under ‘‘Other Attachments Form,’’ d. Maintain an active SAM
applicant’s intent to submit it. You please list the page number or numbers registration with current information
should send this email notification to: on which we can find this information. while your application is under review

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jul 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:22:04
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:22:04
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Dates		Applications Available: July 11, 2017.
Contact		Christine Miller, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W205, Washington, DC 20202- 5960. Or by email: [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 31956