82 FR 32026 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Introduce a New Market Maker Peg Order
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 131 (July 11, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 131 (July 11, 2017)
| Page Range | 32026-32030 | |
| FR Document | 2017-14429 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 11, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 32026-32030] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-14429] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-81078; File No. SR-IEX-2017-22] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Introduce a New Market Maker Peg Order July 5, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on June 30, 2017, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\4\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or the ``Exchange'') is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change to introduce a new Market Maker Peg Order, designed [[Page 32027]] to simplify market maker compliance with IEX Rule 11.151 (Market Maker Obligations), and make a conforming change regarding connectivity within the Exchange System. In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend paragraph (d) of Rule 11.340 to describe how Market Maker Peg Orders in a Pilot Security \6\ would be priced in order to comply with the Plan to Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program (``Tick Pilot Plan'').\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \6\ Pilot Security has the meaning specified in the Tick Pilot Plan. \7\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 74892 (May 6, 2015), 80 FR 27513 (File No. 4-657) (``Tick Plan Approval Order''). See also Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 76382 (November 6, 2015) (File No. 4-657), 80 FR 70284 (File No. 4-657) (November 13, 2015), which extended the pilot period commencement date from May 6, 2015 to October 3, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's Web site at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Background IEX Rule 11.151 (Market Maker Obligations) requires market makers for each stock in which they are registered to continuously maintain a two-sided quotation within a designated percentage of the National Best Bid (``NBB'') and National Best Offer (``NBO''),\8\ as appropriate. In addition to the market maker quoting and pricing obligations set forth in the Exchange's rules, market makers must meet their obligations under Rule 15c3-5 under the Act (the ``Market Access Rule'') \9\ and Regulation SHO.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ As defined by Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(42). 17 CFR 242.600. \9\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-5. \10\ 17 CFR 242.200 through 204. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Market Access Rule requires a broker-dealer with market access, or that provides a customer or any other person with access to an exchange or alternative trading system through use of its market participant identifier or otherwise, to establish, document, and maintain a system of risk management controls and supervisory procedures reasonably designed to manage the financial, regulatory, and other risks of this business activity. These controls must be reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements, which are defined as ``all federal securities laws, rules and regulations, and rules of self-regulatory organizations, that are applicable in connection with market access.'' \11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See supra note 5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to the obligations of the Market Access Rule, broker- dealers have independent obligations that arise under Regulation SHO. Regulation SHO obligations generally include properly marking sell orders, obtaining a ``locate'' for short sale orders, closing out fail to deliver positions, and, where applicable, complying with the short sale price test.\12\ While there are certain exceptions to some of the requirements of Regulation SHO where a market maker is engaged in bona- fide market making activities,\13\ the availability of those exceptions is distinct and independent from whether a market maker submits an order that is a Market Maker Peg Order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See supra note 6. \13\ See 17 CFR 242.203(b)(1). The Commission adopted a narrow exception to Regulation SHO's ``locate'' requirement for market makers engaged in bona fide market making that may need to facilitate customer orders in a fast moving market without being subject to the possible delays associated with complying with such requirement. See Exchange Act Release No. 50103 (July 28, 2004), 69 FR 48008, 48015 (August 6, 2004) (providing guidance as to what does not constitute bona-fide market making for purposes of claiming the exception to Regulation SHO's ``locate'' requirement). See also Exchange Act Release No. 58775 (October 14, 2008), 73 FR 61690, 61698-9 (October 17, 2008) (providing guidance regarding what is bona-fide market making for purposes of complying with the market maker exception to Regulation SHO's ``locate'' requirement including without limitation whether the market maker incurs any economic or market risk with respect to the securities, continuous quotations that are at or near the market on both sides and that are communicated and represented in a way that makes them widely accessible to investors and other broker-dealers and a pattern of trading that includes both purchases and sales in roughly comparable amounts to provide liquidity to customers or other broker-dealers). Thus, market makers would not be able to rely solely on quotations priced in accordance with the Designated Percentages under proposed Rule 11.190(b)(13) for eligibility for the bona-fide market making exception to the ``locate'' requirement based on the criteria set forth by the Commission. It should also be noted that a determination of bona-fide market making is relevant for the purposes of a broker-dealer's close-out obligations under Rule 204 of Regulation SHO. See 17 CFR 242.204(a)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule The Exchange is proposing to introduce a new Market Maker Peg Order type, designed to simplify market maker compliance with the continuous quoting and pricing obligations, as well as market maker compliance with the requirements of the Market Access Rule and Regulation SHO. The Market Maker Peg Order, as proposed, is substantially similar to equivalent order types offered by other market centers, including Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Bats''), Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), and Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'').\14\ Specifically, the Market Maker Peg Order would be a one-sided limit order and, similar to other peg orders available to market participants, priced in reference to or ``pegged'' to the NBB or NBO,\15\ but is distinguishable in that it would always be displayed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See e.g., Bats Rule 11.9(c)(16), Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(7), and EDGX Rule 11.8(e). \15\ See Rule 11.190(a)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that this order-based approach would provide an effective compliance tool to facilitate market makers compliance with the requirements of the Market Access Rule and Regulation SHO while also providing quotation adjusting functionality to its market makers. Market makers would have control of order origination, as required by the Market Access Rule, while also allowing market makers to make marking and locate determinations prior to order entry, as required by Regulation SHO. As such, market makers using Market Maker Peg Orders would be fully able to comply with the requirements of the Market Access Rule and Regulation SHO, as they would when placing any order, while also facilitating compliance with their Exchange market making obligations. In this regard, the Market Maker Peg Order does not by itself ensure that the market maker is satisfying the requirements of Regulation SHO, including the satisfaction of the locate requirements of Rule 203(b)(1) or an exception thereto. It is expected that market makers will perform the necessary checks to comply with Regulation SHO, prior to entry of a Market Maker Peg Order. The Market Maker Peg Order would be limited to registered market makers \16\ and would have its price automatically set and adjusted by the System, both upon entry and any time thereafter, in order to comply with the Exchange's rules regarding market maker quoting [[Page 32028]] and pricing obligations.\17\ Specifically, upon entry or at the beginning of the Regular Market Session, as applicable, the entered bid or offer is automatically priced by the System at the Designated Percentage (as defined in Rule 11.151(a)(6)) away from the then current NBB or NBO, as applicable, or if there is no NBB or NBO, at the Designated Percentage away from the last reported sale from the responsible single plan processor in order to comply with the quotation requirements for market makers set forth in Rule 11.151(a). Market makers may submit Market Maker Peg Orders to the Exchange starting at the beginning of the Pre-Market Session, but the order will not be executable or automatically priced until the beginning of the Regular Market Session, and will expire at the end of the Regular Market Session. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See Rule 11.150. \17\ The Market Maker Peg Order is one-sided, and thus a market maker seeking to use Market Maker Peg Orders to comply with the Exchange's continuous two-sided quotation requirements would need to submit both a bid and an offer using the order type. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reaching the Defined Limit (as defined in Rule 11.151(a)(7)), the price of a Market Maker Peg Order bid or offer will be adjusted by the System to the Designated Percentage away from the then current NBB or NBO, or, if there is no NBB or NBO, the order will, by default, be the Designated Percentage away from the last reported sale from the responsible single plan processor. If a Market Maker Peg Order bid or offer moves a specified number of percentage points away from the Designated Percentage towards the then current NBB or NBO, which number of percentage points will be determined and published in a circular distributed to Members from time to time, the price of such bid or offer will be adjusted by the System to the Designated Percentage away from the then current NBB or NBO, as applicable. If there is no NBB or NBO, as applicable, the order will be adjusted by the System to the Designated Percentage away from the last reported sale from the responsible single plan processor. In the event that pricing a Market Maker Peg Order at the Designated Percentage away from the then current National Best Bid and National Best Offer, or, if no National Best Bid or National Best Offer, to the Designated Percentage away from the last reported sale from the responsible single plan processor, would result in the order exceeding its limit price, the order will be cancelled or rejected. The limit price entered on a Market Maker Peg Order is designed to allow a market maker to specify a price at which the initial pricing and any subsequent repricing of the order to the Designated Percentage will be constrained. If, after entry, the Market Maker Peg Order is priced based on the last reported sale from the single plan processor and such Market Maker Peg Order is established as the NBB or NBO, the Market Maker Peg Order will not be subsequently adjusted in accordance with this rule until either there is a new consolidated last sale, or a new NBB or NBO is established by a national securities exchange. Market Maker Peg Orders are not eligible for routing pursuant to Rule 11.230(b) and are always displayed on the Exchange. In addition, a new timestamp is created for the order each time that it is automatically adjusted in accordance with the proposed rule. Market Maker Peg Orders may only be entered by a registered Market Maker, pursuant to IEX Rule 11.150. In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend paragraph (d) of Rule 11.340 to describe changes to System functionality with respect to Market Maker Peg Orders in order to comply with the Tick Pilot Plan. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to add new subparagraph (d)(1)(A) to Rule 11.340 to specify that if, pursuant to proposed Rule 11.190(b)(13), a Market Maker Peg Order in a Pilot Security would be priced at an increment other than $0.05, the System will round such order to buy (sell) up (down) to the nearest permissible increment. This approach, which is substantially similar to Bats Rule 11.27(c)(5), is designed to ensure that Market Maker Peg Orders for Pilot Securities are appropriately priced in $0.05 increments by rounding such order to the nearest permissible increment, that is also compliant with the minimum market maker quoting obligations set forth in IEX Rule 11.151. In addition, if the rounding methodology results in a Market Maker Peg Order being priced to a price below $0.05, the order will be cancelled back to the market maker that entered the order. The Exchange notes that notwithstanding the availability of the proposed Market Maker Peg Order functionality, a market maker remains responsible for entering, monitoring, and resubmitting, as applicable, quotations that meet the requirements of Rule 11.151. As proposed, the Exchange will apply the Designated Percentage and Defined Limit as set forth in Rules 11.151(a)(6) and (7), respectively, subject to the following exception: For all NMS stocks with a price less than $1 per share that are not included in the S&P 500[supreg] Index, Russell 1000[supreg] Index, and a pilot list of Exchange Traded Products, the Exchange will use the Designated Percentage and Defined Limit applicable to NMS stocks equal to or greater than $1 per share that are not included in the S&P 500[supreg] Index, Russell 1000[supreg] Index, and a pilot list of Exchange Traded Products. The System will be available for entry, modification, and cancellation of Market Maker Peg Orders under proposed Rule 11.190(b)(13) only via the POP pursuant to Rule 11.510(b), and thus are subject to the Inbound and Outbound POP Latency upon entry, accordingly.\18\ Furthermore, each time a Market Maker Peg Order is automatically adjusted by the System thereafter in accordance with proposed Rule 11.190(b)(13), all inbound and outbound communications related to the modified order instruction would traverse an additional POP between the Market Maker Peg Order repricing logic, and the Order Book, which is subject to an equivalent 350 microseconds of latency pursuant to proposed Rule 11.510(c)(1).\19\ This approach is designed so that a market maker using a Market Maker Peg Order to facilitate compliance with the Exchange's continuous quoting and pricing obligations is in the same position as a market maker updating its own quote, whose orders would need to traverse a POP. As discussed more fully in the Statutory Basis section, the Exchange believes that it is appropriate to treat Market Maker Peg Orders differently in this regard from other pegged orders (which are repriced without traversing a POP) because of substantially distinguishing characteristics. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See 11.510(b)(1) and (2), respectively, which define the Inbound POP Latency as an equivalent 350 microseconds of latency from the Exchange-provided network interface at the IEX POP to the System at the primary data center; and Outbound POP Latency as an equivalent 350 microseconds of latency from the System at the primary data center to the Exchange-provided network interface at the IEX POP. \19\ The Exchange notes that the same ``additional POP'' that is used to implement an equivalent 350 microseconds of latency to all routable orders sent by the System to the Order Book pursuant to Rule 11.510(c)(1) will be used to implement such delay to all modified order instructions for Market Maker Peg Orders pursuant to proposed Rule 11.190(b)(13). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also proposes to make a conforming change to Rule 11.510(c) regarding connectivity, to provide that, pursuant to Rule 11.190(b)(13), each time a Market Maker Peg Order is automatically adjusted by the System, all inbound and outbound communications related to the modified order instruction will traverse an additional POP between the Market [[Page 32029]] Maker Peg Order repricing logic and the Order Book. The Exchange plans to implement the proposed changes during the third quarter of 2017 pending completion of necessary technology changes and subject to Commission approval. The Exchange will announce the implementation date of the proposed changes by Trader Alert at least 10 business days in advance of such implementation date and within 90 days of approval of this proposed rule change. 2. Statutory Basis IEX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act in general, \20\ and further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\21\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. As noted above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule is designed to simplify market maker compliance with the minimum continuous quoting and pricing obligations, as well as facilitate market maker compliance with the requirements of the Market Access Rule and Regulation SHO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specifically, the Exchange believes that simplifying compliance with this rule will remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and protect investors and the public interest, because it will provide a simplified means by which market makers may offer liquidity, even in circumstances where they are not willing to quote at the inside market. As a result, in circumstances where liquidity available at displayed prices closer to the inside than the price of a Market Maker Peg Order is exhausted during an aggressive market wide sweep, the Market Maker Peg Order may nevertheless be available to support executions at prices that are at least within the applicable Designated Percentage or Defined Limit. Moreover, the methodology for repricing Market Maker Peg Orders is consistent with the requirements of the Act because it is designed to ensure that the displayed price of the order is at least within the applicable Designated Percentage or Defined Limit, as applicable.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ The Exchange notes that in certain scenarios the applicable Designated Percentage or Defined Limit price may be outside of the industry wide limit-up, limit-down price bands, and/or the clearly erroneous parameters. Nevertheless, Market Maker Peg Orders may be less likely to execute at a clearly erroneous price or a price that would trigger a limit-up, limit-down trading pause than other displayed orders that are not subject to the market maker pricing obligations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change also is designed to support the principles of Section 11A(a)(1) of the Act \23\ in that it seeks to assure fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The Exchange believes that offering the Market Maker Peg Order to market makers exclusively is consistent with fair competition among brokers and dealers in that market makers have chosen to subject themselves to the obligations of Rule 11.151, and the benefit conferred on such market participants by this order type is commensurate with the obligations. Furthermore, all Members are eligible to apply for registration as a market maker under Rule 11.150 on a fair and equal basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also believes that it is fair and reasonable for all inbound and outbound communications related to the repricing of a Market Maker Peg Order to traverse a POP that is subject to an equivalent 350 microseconds of latency for several reasons. First, as noted in the Purpose section, this approach is designed so that a market maker using a Market Maker Peg Order to facilitate compliance with the Exchange's continuous quoting and pricing obligations is in the same position as a market maker updating its own quote, whose orders would need to traverse a POP. Similarly, price adjustments to Market Maker Peg Orders will experience the same latency as any other displayed order entered on the Exchange. IEX believes that it is appropriate to treat Market Maker Peg Orders differently in this regard than other pegged order types (which are repriced within the System without traversing a POP) offered by the Exchange because the fundamental characteristics of a Market Maker Peg Order is substantially different from such other peg orders.\24\ Specifically, the other peg order types offered are non-displayed and designed to generally execute at or within the NBBO. A primary function of the IEX POP access delay, in conjunction with the Exchange's consumption of direct proprietary market data without any such delay, is to protect resting non-displayed orders from adverse selection by latency arbitrage whereby market participants with access to fast market data send orders to trade against resting non-displayed interest at soon to be stale prices. Subjecting all inbound and outbound communications related to the repricing of such non-displayed orders to POP latency would frustrate the purpose of the IEX POP since the pegged order would be subject to execution at a stale price before the repricing instruction is received. Moreover, market participants entering non-displayed pegged orders to the Exchange are often large institutional investors that do not have the technical capabilities of market makers or other latency sensitive Members to manage their orders to avoid adverse selection. Such market participants entrust the Exchange, pursuant to its design and System architecture, to accurately price and protect such order from adverse selection. In contrast, and by design, a Market Maker Peg Order is a compliance tool for market makers rather than an order type to facilitate trading at the most current pricing. In this regard, Market Maker Peg Orders are designed to reprice significantly outside the NBBO and are thus are materially less susceptible to adverse selection. Furthermore, such orders are not ``pegged'' to the NBBO in the same manner as non-displayed pegged orders, in that Market Maker Peg Orders only reprice to remain in compliance with the Exchange's quoting and pricing obligations rather than to peg at, close to, or better than the NBBO with each NBBO update. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(8), (9) and (10) with respect to Primary Peg, Midpoint Peg, and Discretionary Peg Orders respectively. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accordingly, the Exchange believes that it is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors to reprice Market Maker Peg Orders through the POP in the interest of ensuring that market makers will not have any unfair advantage over market makers that updates its own quote, as well as with other market participants using displayed orders. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that it is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors to apply a new timestamp to a Market Maker Peg Order each time it is repriced so that a Market Maker Peg Order does not achieve execution priority superior to a displayed order entered at that price earlier in time. Accordingly, market makers will not have any unfair advantage over a market makers updating its own quote, or other market participants using displayed orders on the Exchange. [[Page 32030]] Additionally, the Exchange believes that its proposed rounding of a buy (sell) Market Maker Peg Order in a Pilot Security that would be priced at an increment other than $0.05 up (down) to the nearest permissible increment, as well as to cancel such orders if the rounding methodology results in a Market Maker Peg Order being priced to a price below $0.05, is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest in that it enables the Exchange to comply with the Tick Pilot Plan. Further, the Exchange believes it is also consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest to cancel or reject (as applicable) a Market Maker Peg Order that would otherwise be priced at a price exceeding its limit price because such price would not be consistent with the market maker's instructions. Lastly, the Exchange believes that the proposed conforming rule change to Rule 11.510(c)(1) is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest in that it is designed to provide clarity to market participants regarding Market Maker Peg Order repricing methodology, and make the Exchange's rule more clear and explicit. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition IEX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposal will enhance the Exchange's competitiveness by providing market makers on IEX with a means to offer liquidity even in circumstances where they are not willing to quote at the inside market. Based on informal discussion with market participants that serve as market maker on other trading centers, the Exchange believes that this functionality will be appealing to potential market makers, and therefore will make it more likely that market participants will choose to become registered market makers on the Exchange. This may, in turn, increase the extent of liquidity available on IEX and increase its ability to compete with other execution venues to attract orders that are seeking liquidity. The Exchange further notes that the Market Maker Peg Order, as proposed, is substantially similar to equivalent order types offered by other market centers, including Bats, Nasdaq, and EDGX, and therefore will not impair market participants or other market centers from competing, but would in fact allow the Exchange to compete with existing functionality offered by competing market centers.\25\ Moreover, there is no barrier to other exchanges adopting the same repricing functionality. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See supra note 9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With regard to intra-market competition, the Exchange does not believe that the method of repricing Market Maker Peg Orders will result in any burden on intra-market competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, as described in the Statutory Basis section, the Exchange's proposed method of repricing is designed in the interest of ensuring that market makers using Market Maker Peg Orders will be in the same position as market makers updating their own quotes, as well as other market participants using displayed orders. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-IEX-2017-22 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2017-22. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2017-22, and should be submitted on or before August 1, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\26\ Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2017-14429 Filed 7-10-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![32026 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 11, 2017 / Notices
Arca Equities Rule 8.201(g), which regarding trading in the Shares from No. 1, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5)
allow the Exchange to ensure that they markets and other entities that are of the Act 33 and the rules and
do not use their positions to violate the members of ISG or with which the regulations thereunder applicable to a
requirements of Exchange rules or Exchange has in place a comprehensive national securities exchange.
applicable federal securities laws.23 surveillance sharing agreement.29
In support of this proposal, the (7) Prior to the commencement of IV. Conclusion
Exchange has made the following trading, the Exchange will inform its It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
additional representations: ETP Holders in an Information Bulletin Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,34
(1) The Shares will be listed and of the special characteristics and risks that the proposed rule change (SR–
traded on the Exchange pursuant to the associated with trading the Shares. NYSEArca–2017–55), as modified by
initial and continued listing criteria in Specifically, the Information Bulletin Amendment No. 1 be, and it hereby is,
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.201.24 will discuss the following: (1) The approved.
(2) The Exchange has appropriate procedures for purchases and For the Commission, by the Division of
rules to facilitate transactions in the redemptions of Shares in Baskets Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
Shares during all trading sessions.25 (including noting that Shares are not authority.35
(3) The Exchange deems the Shares to individually redeemable); (2) NYSE Eduardo A. Aleman,
be equity securities.26 Arca Equities Rule 9.2(a), which Assistant Secretary.
(4) The Exchange also has a general imposes a duty of due diligence on its [FR Doc. 2017–14428 Filed 7–10–17; 8:45 am]
policy prohibiting the distribution of ETP Holders to learn the essential facts
material, non-public information by its BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
relating to every customer prior to
employees.27 trading the Shares; (3) how information
(5) Trading in the Shares will be regarding the IIV is disseminated; (4)
subject to the existing trading SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
ETP Holders deliver a prospectus to COMMISSION
surveillances administered by the investors purchasing newly issued
Exchange, as well as cross-market Shares prior to or concurrently with the [Release No. 34–81078; File No. SR–IEX–
surveillances administered by FINRA on confirmation of a transaction; (5) the 2017–22]
behalf of the Exchange, which are possibility that trading spreads and the
designed to detect violations of Self-Regulatory Organizations;
resulting premium or discount on the
Exchange rules and applicable federal Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of
Shares may widen as a result of reduced
securities laws, and that these Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
liquidity of gold trading during the Core
procedures are adequate to properly Introduce a New Market Maker Peg
and Late Trading Sessions after the
monitor Exchange trading of the Shares Order
close of the major world gold markets;
in all trading sessions and to deter and and (6) trading information.30 July 5, 2017.
detect violations of Exchange rules and (8) All statements and representations Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
federal securities laws applicable to made in this filing regarding (a) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
trading on the Exchange.28 description of the portfolio, (b) ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
(6) The Exchange or FINRA, on behalf limitations on portfolio holdings or notice is hereby given that, on June 30,
of the Exchange, or both, will reference assets, or (c) the applicability 2017, the Investors Exchange LLC
communicate as needed regarding of Exchange listing rules specified in (‘‘IEX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
trading in the Shares with other markets this rule filing shall constitute Securities and Exchange Commission
and other entities that are members of continued listing requirements for (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
the ISG, and the Exchange or FINRA, on listing the Shares of the Trust on the change as described in Items I, II and III
behalf of the Exchange, or both, may Exchange.31 below, which Items have been prepared
obtain trading information regarding (9) The issuer has represented to the by the self-regulatory organization. The
trading in the Shares from such markets Exchange that it will advise the Commission is publishing this notice to
and other entities. In addition, the Exchange of any failure by the Trust to solicit comments on the proposed rule
Exchange may obtain information comply with the continued listing change from interested persons.
requirements and, pursuant to its
23 Commentary .04 of NYSE Arca Equities Rule
obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
6.3 requires that an ETP Holder acting as a Statement of the Terms of Substance of
registered market maker in the Shares, and its
Act, the Exchange will monitor for
affiliates, establish, maintain and enforce written compliance with the continued listing the Proposed Rule Change
policies and procedures reasonably designed to requirements. If the Trust is not in Pursuant to the provisions of Section
prevent the misuse of any material nonpublic compliance with the applicable listing
information with respect to such products, any 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange
components of the related products, any physical
requirements, the Exchange will Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),4 and Rule 19b–4
asset or commodity underlying the product, commence delisting procedures under thereunder,5 Investors Exchange LLC
applicable currencies, underlying indexes, related the NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.5(m).32 (‘‘IEX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with
futures or options on futures, and any related This approval order is based on all of the Securities and Exchange
derivative instruments. the Exchange’s representations—
24 See id. Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
25 See id.
including those set forth above, in the proposed rule change to introduce a
26 See id. The Commission notes that, as a result, Notice, and in Amendment No. 1—and new Market Maker Peg Order, designed
trading of the Shares will be subject to the the Exchange’s description of the Trust.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Exchange’s existing rules governing the trading of For the foregoing reasons, the 33 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
equity securities. Commission finds that the proposed 34 15
27 See id. at 24184.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
rule change, as modified by Amendment 35 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
28 See id. at 24183. FINRA conducts cross-market
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
surveillances on behalf of the Exchange pursuant to 29 See
a regulatory services agreement. The Exchange is id. at 24183–84. 2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
30 See id. at 24184. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
responsible for FINRA’s performance under this
31 See id. at 24184. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
regulatory services agreement. See id. at 24183,
n.28. 32 See id. 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jul 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_32157/page/1.svg)
![32030 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 11, 2017 / Notices
Additionally, the Exchange believes offered by competing market centers.25 All submissions should refer to File
that its proposed rounding of a buy Moreover, there is no barrier to other Number SR–IEX–2017–22. This file
(sell) Market Maker Peg Order in a Pilot exchanges adopting the same repricing number should be included on the
Security that would be priced at an functionality. subject line if email is used. To help the
increment other than $0.05 up (down) to With regard to intra-market Commission process and review your
the nearest permissible increment, as competition, the Exchange does not comments more efficiently, please use
well as to cancel such orders if the believe that the method of repricing only one method. The Commission will
rounding methodology results in a Market Maker Peg Orders will result in post all comments on the Commission’s
Market Maker Peg Order being priced to any burden on intra-market competition Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
a price below $0.05, is consistent with that is not necessary or appropriate in rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
the protection of investors and the furtherance of the purposes of the Act. submission, all subsequent
public interest in that it enables the To the contrary, as described in the amendments, all written statements
Exchange to comply with the Tick Pilot Statutory Basis section, the Exchange’s with respect to the proposed rule
Plan. Further, the Exchange believes it proposed method of repricing is change that are filed with the
is also consistent with the protection of designed in the interest of ensuring that Commission, and all written
investors and the public interest to market makers using Market Maker Peg communications relating to the
cancel or reject (as applicable) a Market Orders will be in the same position as proposed rule change between the
Maker Peg Order that would otherwise market makers updating their own Commission and any person, other than
be priced at a price exceeding its limit quotes, as well as other market those that may be withheld from the
price because such price would not be participants using displayed orders. public in accordance with the
consistent with the market maker’s provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
instructions. available for Web site viewing and
Statement on Comments on the
Lastly, the Exchange believes that the printing in the Commission’s Public
Proposed Rule Change Received From
proposed conforming rule change to Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Members, Participants, or Others
Rule 11.510(c)(1) is consistent with the Washington, DC 20549, on official
protection of investors and the public Written comments were neither business days between the hours of
interest in that it is designed to provide solicited nor received. 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
clarity to market participants regarding III. Date of Effectiveness of the filing also will be available for
Market Maker Peg Order repricing Proposed Rule Change and Timing for inspection and copying at the principal
methodology, and make the Exchange’s Commission Action office of the Exchange. All comments
rule more clear and explicit. received will be posted without change;
Within 45 days of the date of the Commission does not edit personal
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s publication of this notice in the Federal identifying information from
Statement on Burden on Competition Register or within such longer period (i) submissions. You should submit only
IEX does not believe that the as the Commission may designate up to information that you wish to make
proposed rule change will result in any 90 days of such date if it finds such available publicly. All submissions
burden on competition that is not longer period to be appropriate and should refer to File Number SR–IEX–
necessary or appropriate in furtherance publishes its reasons for so finding or 2017–22, and should be submitted on or
of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, before August 1, 2017.
the Exchange believes that the proposal the Commission shall: (a) By order
approve or disapprove such proposed For the Commission, by the Division of
will enhance the Exchange’s Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
competitiveness by providing market rule change, or (b) institute proceedings authority.26
makers on IEX with a means to offer to determine whether the proposed rule
Eduardo A. Aleman,
liquidity even in circumstances where change should be disapproved.
Assistant Secretary.
they are not willing to quote at the IV. Solicitation of Comments [FR Doc. 2017–14429 Filed 7–10–17; 8:45 am]
inside market. Based on informal
Interested persons are invited to BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
discussion with market participants that
submit written data, views, and
serve as market maker on other trading
arguments concerning the foregoing,
centers, the Exchange believes that this SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
including whether the proposed rule
functionality will be appealing to COMMISSION
change is consistent with the Act.
potential market makers, and therefore
Comments may be submitted by any of
will make it more likely that market [Release No. 34–81074; File Nos. SR–DTC–
the following methods: 2017–008; SR–FICC–2017–014; SR–NSCC–
participants will choose to become
registered market makers on the Electronic Comments 2017–008]
Exchange. This may, in turn, increase • Use the Commission’s Internet Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
the extent of liquidity available on IEX comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Depository Trust Company; Fixed
and increase its ability to compete with rules/sro.shtml); or Income Clearing Corporation; National
other execution venues to attract orders • Send an email to rule-comments@ Securities Clearing Corporation;
that are seeking liquidity. The Exchange sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Notice of Filings of Proposed Rule
further notes that the Market Maker Peg IEX–2017–22 on the subject line. Changes To Adopt the Clearing
Order, as proposed, is substantially
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments Agency Model Risk Management
similar to equivalent order types offered
Framework
by other market centers, including Bats, • Send paper comments in triplicate
Nasdaq, and EDGX, and therefore will to Secretary, Securities and Exchange July 5, 2017.
not impair market participants or other Commission, 100 F Street NE., Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
market centers from competing, but Washington, DC 20549–1090. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
would in fact allow the Exchange to
compete with existing functionality 25 See supra note 9. 26 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jul 10, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_32157/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:22:09
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:22:09
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 32026 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR