82 FR 32170 - Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 132 (July 12, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 132 (July 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 32170-32172 | |
| FR Document | 2017-14611 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 12, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 32170-32172] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-14611] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-010] Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014- 2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 7, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the first administrative review (AR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic products from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) for the AR is July 31, 2014, through January 31, 2016. The AR covers nine companies including one mandatory respondent. We received comments from interested parties on our preliminary results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the margin calculations for the final results of this AR. The final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective July 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 7, 2017, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the 2014-2016 AR of the antidumping duty order on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic products from the PRC.\1\ For events subsequent to the Preliminary Results, [[Page 32171]] see the Department's Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2016, 82 FR 12793 (March 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People's Republic of China,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is modules, laminates and/or panels consisting of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products, including building integrated materials.\3\ Merchandise covered by the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.8030, 8507.20.8040, 8507.20.8060, 8507.20.8090, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030 and 8501.31.8000. These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made revisions to our preliminary calculations of the weighted-average dumping margins for the mandatory respondent, Trina.4 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ In these final results of review, the Department has continued to treat the following six companies as a single entity: Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Techology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubeui Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Collectively, Trina). See Preliminary Results, 82 FR 12793 (March 7, 2017) and PDM at 6. \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at comments 6, 8, 9, and 11. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we found that one company, JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Solar), had no shipments during the POR.\6\ Consistent with the Department's assessment practice in NME cases, we completed the review with respect to JA Solar.\7\ The Department placed on the record a memorandum regarding JA Solar's no shipment claim and shipment data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).\8\ On May 1, 2017, JA Solar timely submitted comments regarding the Department's memorandum on JA Solar's no shipment claim. No parties submitted rebuttal comments regarding JA Solar's no shipment claim. For these final results, we continue to find that JA Solar had no shipments during the POR. As noted in the ``Assessment'' section below, the Department will issue appropriate instructions with respect to this company to CBP based on our final results.\9\ In addition, JA Solar will maintain its dumping margin from the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which it participated. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Results. \7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment of Antidumping Duties). \8\ See memorandum to interested parties re: ``Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the People's Republic of China: Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.'s No-shipment Claim and Release of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Information Relating to No Shipment Claims Made in the 2014-2016 Administrative Review of Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the People's Republic of China,'' dated April 25. 2017. \9\ See Assessment of Antidumping Duties; see also the ``Assessment'' section of this notice, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that Trina, and seven other companies demonstrated their eligibility for separate rates.\10\ No parties commented on this preliminary decision. For these final results, we continue to find that the eight companies listed in the table in the ``Final Results'' section of this notice are eligible for separate rates status. The Department assigned a dumping margin to the separate rate companies that it did not individually examine, but which demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate, based on the mandatory respondent's dumping margin.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Preliminary Results. \11\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Final Dumping Margin for Separate Rate Recipients,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter dumping margin ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar 9.61 (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Yangcheng Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd..................... BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd.......................... 9.61 Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd............................. 9.61 Hefei JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.......................... 9.61 Perlight Solar Co., Ltd..................................... 9.61 Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd............................. 9.61 Sunny Apex Development Ltd.................................. 9.61 Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd................................. 9.61 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity and the Department no longer considers the PRC-wide entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews,\12\ we did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide entity. Thus, the weighted-average dumping margin for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 165.04 percent) is not subject to change as a result of this review.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). \13\ See Certain Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 8592 (February 18, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these final results of review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise [[Page 32172]] subject to this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will calculate importer- (or customer)- specific assessment rates for merchandise subject to this review. Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, the Department calculated importer- (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to the importer- (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to the importer- (or customer).\14\ Where the Department calculated an importer- (or customer)-specific weighted- average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to the importer- (or customer) by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer- (or customer)-specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.\15\ Where an importer- (or customer)- specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where either the respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \15\ Id. \16\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For merchandise whose sale/entry was not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, but that entered under the case number of that exporter (i.e., at the individually-examined exporter's cash deposit rate), the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion of this practice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results of review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above the cash deposit rate will be their respective rate established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously investigated PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 165.04 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final results within five days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APO) This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice of the final results of this antidumping duty administrative review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: July 5, 2017. Carole Showers, Executive Director, Office of Policy, performing the duties of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order List of Abbreviations and Acronyms Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Scope of the Order (A) The Scope of the Order Is Unlawful (B) The Final Scope Determination Does Not Apply Retroactively Comment 2: CVD Export Subsidies Comment 3: Use of Zero Import Quantity Comment 4: Use of Differential Pricing Analysis Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Aluminum Frames Comment 6: Surrogate Value for Scrap Modules Comment 7: Exclusion of Certain Sales in the Calculation of Dumping Margin Comment 8: Warranty Expenses Comment 9: Debt Restructuring Income Comment 10: Surrogate Value for Module Glass Comment 11: Selection of Financial Statements Comment 12: JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.'s No Shipments Claim [FR Doc. 2017-14611 Filed 7-11-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![32170 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 12, 2017 / Notices
Department has determined, and CBP completed segment of this proceeding VI. Recommendation
shall assess, antidumping duties on all for the manufacturer of the [FR Doc. 2017–14610 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
appropriate entries of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
merchandise in accordance with the rate for all other manufacturers or
final results of this review. The exporters will continue to be 36.52
Department intends to issue appropriate percent, the all-others rate determined DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
assessment instructions directly to CBP in the LTFV investigation.6 These cash
41 days after publication of the final deposit requirements, when imposed, International Trade Administration
results of this administrative review. shall remain in effect until further
For Electrolux, the Department notice. [A–570–010]
calculated an ad valorem importer-
specific assessment rate equal to the Notification to Importers Regarding the Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
total amount of dumping calculated for Reimbursement of Duties Products From the People’s Republic
the importer’s examined sales and the This notice also serves as a final of China: Final Results of Antidumping
total entered value of those sales. Where reminder to importers of their Duty Administrative Review and Final
an importer-specific assessment rate is responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Determination of No Shipments; 2014–
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 to file a certificate regarding the 2016
percent), the Department will instruct reimbursement of antidumping duties
CBP to liquidate these entries without prior to liquidation of the relevant AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
regard to antidumping duties pursuant entries during this review period. International Trade Administration,
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Failure to comply with this requirement Department of Commerce.
The Department’s ‘‘automatic could result in the Secretary’s SUMMARY: On March 7, 2017, the
assessment’’ practice will apply to presumption that reimbursement of Department of Commerce (the
entries of subject merchandise during antidumping duties occurred and the Department) published the preliminary
the POR produced by Electrolux, for subsequent assessment of double results of the first administrative review
which the company did not know that antidumping duties. (AR) of the antidumping duty (AD)
its merchandise was destined for the order on certain crystalline silicon
United States.4 In such instances, we Notification Regarding Administrative
photovoltaic products from the People’s
will instruct CBP to liquidate Protective Order
Republic of China (PRC). The period of
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate This notice serves as the only review (POR) for the AR is July 31,
established in the less-than fair-value reminder to parties subject to 2014, through January 31, 2016. The AR
(LTFV) investigation (i.e., 36.52 administrative protective order (APO) of covers nine companies including one
percent),5 if there is no rate for the their responsibility concerning the mandatory respondent. We received
intermediary company(ies) involved in disposition of proprietary information comments from interested parties on our
the transaction. disclosed under APO in accordance preliminary results. Based on our
Cash Deposit Requirements with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely analysis of the comments received, we
written notification of return/ made changes to the margin calculations
The following deposit requirements destruction of APO materials or for the final results of this AR. The final
will be effective upon publication of the conversion to judicial protective order is weighted-average dumping margins are
notice of final results of administrative hereby requested. Failure to comply listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of
review for all shipments of the subject with the regulations and the terms of an Review’’ section of this notice.
merchandise entered, or withdrawn APO is a sanctionable violation.
from warehouse, for consumption on or DATES: Effective July 12, 2017.
This notice is published in
after the date of publication, as provided accordance with section 751(a)(1) and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD
The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of the Operations, Office IV, Enforcement &
be equal to the weighted-average Department’s regulations. Compliance, International Trade
dumping margin established in the final Administration, Department of
Dated: July 5, 2017.
results of this administrative review; (2) Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
Gary Taverman,
for merchandise exported by NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
manufacturers or exporters not covered Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping (202) 482–3147.
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
in this administrative review but performing the non-exclusive functions and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
covered in a prior segment of the duties of the Assistant Secretary for
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Background
Enforcement and Compliance.
continue to be the company-specific rate On March 7, 2017, the Department
published for the most recently- Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
published in the Federal Register the
completed segment; (3) if the exporter is the Issues and Decision Memorandum
preliminary results of the 2014–2016 AR
not a firm covered in this review, a prior I. Summary of the antidumping duty order on
review, or the original LTFV II. Background certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic
investigation, but the manufacturer is, III. Scope of the Order products from the PRC.1 For events
IV. Margin Calculations
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
the cash deposit rate will be the rate subsequent to the Preliminary Results,
V. Discussion of the Issues
established for the most recently-
Comment 1. The Department’s Use of
1 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Zeroing
4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Comment 2. Methodological Issues in the Products from the People’s Republic of China:
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Differential Pricing Analysis
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) for a full discussion of this Administrative Review and Preliminary
practice. Comment 3. Calculation Errors in
Determination of No Shipments; 2014–2016, 82 FR
5 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and Electrolux’s Margin Program 12793 (March 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results) and
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013). 6 Id. (PDM).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Jul 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_32302/page/1.svg)
![32172 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 12, 2017 / Notices
subject to this review. For any Cash Deposit Requirements Failure to comply with the regulations
individually examined respondent The following cash deposit and terms of an APO is a violation
whose weighted-average dumping requirements will be effective upon which is subject to sanction.
margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 publication of these final results of This notice of the final results of this
percent), the Department will calculate review for shipments of the subject antidumping duty administrative review
importer- (or customer)-specific merchandise from the PRC entered, or is issued and published in accordance
assessment rates for merchandise withdrawn from warehouse, for with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
subject to this review. Where the consumption on or after the publication Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR
respondent reported reliable entered date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 351.221(b)(5).
values, the Department calculated of the Act: (1) For the companies listed Dated: July 5, 2017.
importer- (or customer)-specific ad above the cash deposit rate will be their Carole Showers,
valorem rates by aggregating the respective rate established in the final Executive Director, Office of Policy,
dumping margins calculated for all U.S. results of this review; (2) for previously performing the duties of the Deputy Assistant
sales to the importer- (or customer) and investigated PRC and non-PRC exporters Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
dividing this amount by the total not listed above that have separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
entered value of the sales to the the Issues and Decision Memorandum
importer- (or customer).14 Where the the exporter-specific rate published for
Department calculated an importer- (or the most recent period; (3) for all PRC Summary
exporters of subject merchandise which Background
customer)-specific weighted-average Scope of the Order
dumping margin by dividing the total have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
amount of dumping for reviewed sales Discussion of the Issues
be the rate for the PRC-wide entity (i.e.,
to the importer- (or customer) by the Comment 1: Scope of the Order
165.04 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC
total sales quantity associated with (A) The Scope of the Order Is Unlawful
exporters of subject merchandise which (B) The Final Scope Determination Does
those transactions, the Department will have not received their own rate, the
direct CBP to assess importer- (or Not Apply Retroactively
cash deposit rate will be the rate Comment 2: CVD Export Subsidies
customer)-specific assessment rates applicable to the PRC exporter that Comment 3: Use of Zero Import Quantity
based on the resulting per-unit rates.15 supplied that non-PRC exporter. These Comment 4: Use of Differential Pricing
Where an importer- (or customer)- deposit requirements, when imposed, Analysis
specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is shall remain in effect until further Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Aluminum
greater than de minimis, the Department notice. Frames
will instruct CBP to collect the Comment 6: Surrogate Value for Scrap
appropriate duties at the time of Disclosure Modules
We intend to disclose the calculations Comment 7: Exclusion of Certain Sales in the
liquidation. Where either the Calculation of Dumping Margin
respondent’s weighted average dumping performed for these final results within Comment 8: Warranty Expenses
margin is zero or de minimis, or an five days of publication of this notice in Comment 9: Debt Restructuring Income
importer (or customer-) specific ad the Federal Register in accordance with Comment 10: Surrogate Value for Module
valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de 19 CFR 351.224(b). Glass
minimis, the Department will instruct Notification to Importers Regarding the Comment 11: Selection of Financial
CBP to liquidate appropriate entries Statements
Reimbursement of Duties Comment 12: JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.’s
without regard to antidumping duties.16 This notice also serves as a final No Shipments Claim
For merchandise whose sale/entry reminder to importers of their [FR Doc. 2017–14611 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
was not reported in the U.S. sales responsibility under 19 CFR BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
database submitted by an exporter 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
individually examined during this regarding the reimbursement of
review, but that entered under the case antidumping duties prior to liquidation DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
number of that exporter (i.e., at the of the relevant entries during this
individually-examined exporter’s cash review period. Failure to comply with National Institute of Standards and
deposit rate), the Department will this requirement could result in the Technology
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at Department’s presumption that [Docket Number 170627596–7596–01]
the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the reimbursement of antidumping duties
Department determines that an exporter occurred and the subsequent assessment Strengthening the Cybersecurity of
under review had no shipments of the of double antidumping duties. Federal Networks and Critical
subject merchandise, any suspended Notification Regarding Administrative Infrastructure: Workforce Development
entries that entered under that Protective Orders (APO) AGENCY: National Institute of Standards
exporter’s case number will be
This notice also serves as a reminder and Technology (NIST), Department of
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.17 to parties subject to APO of their Commerce.
responsibility concerning the return or ACTION: Notice; Request for Information
14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
15 Id.
destruction of proprietary information (RFI).
16 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
disclosed under APO in accordance
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues SUMMARY: Executive Order 13800,
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty to govern business proprietary ‘‘Strengthening the Cybersecurity of
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 information in this segment of the Federal Networks and Critical
(February 14, 2012). proceeding. Timely written notification Infrastructure’’ (the ‘‘Executive Order’’),
17 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
of the return or destruction of APO directs the Secretary of Commerce, in
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion materials, or conversion to judicial conjunction with the Secretary of
of this practice. protective order, is hereby requested. Homeland Security, and in consultation
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:54 Jul 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_32302/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-12 03:00:28
Document Modified: 2017-07-12 03:00:28
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective July 12, 2017. | |
| Contact | Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 32170 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR