82 FR 33851 - Air Plan Approval; Florida: Unnecessary Rule Removal

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 139 (July 21, 2017)

Page Range		33851-33852
FR Document		2017-15267

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Florida State Implementation Plan submitted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection on February 20, 2013. The revision removes unnecessary and superseded rules from the Florida State Implementation Plan. Specifically, this revision removes non-regulatory introductory language, as well as a regulation that has been superseded by more stringent federal regulations. This action is being taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 139 (Friday, July 21, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33851-33852]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0656; FRL-9965-13-Region 4]


Air Plan Approval; Florida: Unnecessary Rule Removal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a revision to the Florida State Implementation Plan submitted 
by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection on February 20, 
2013. The revision removes unnecessary and superseded rules from the 
Florida State Implementation Plan. Specifically, this revision removes 
non-regulatory introductory language, as well as a regulation that has 
been superseded by more stringent federal regulations. This action is 
being taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 21, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2016-0656 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment 
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment 
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general 
guidance on

[[Page 33852]]

making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory 
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, 
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 
30303-8960. Mr. Lakeman can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9043 
or via electronic mail at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's implementation plan revision as 
a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views 
this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse 
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to 
this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document 
should do so at this time.

    Dated: July 7, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2017-15267 Filed 7-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 139 / Friday, July 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules 33851

affiliated with any person (other than a IX. Statutory Authority and Text of the those of the NYSE, NYSE American, or
natural person) that is not a small Proposed Rule Nasdaq/NGM.
business or small organization.93 The Commission is proposing an By the Commission.
The Commission preliminarily amendment to Rule 146 pursuant to the Dated: July 14, 2017.
believes that the proposal to amend Securities Act of 1933,96 particularly Brent J. Fields,
Rule 146(b) would not affect a Sections 18(b)(1)(B) and 19(a).97 Secretary.
substantial number of small entities [FR Doc. 2017–15216 Filed 7–20–17; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 230
because IEX is not a small entity. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Further, to list its securities on IEX, an Securities.
issuer’s aggregate market value of For the reasons set forth in the
publicly held shares would be required preamble, the Commission proposes to ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
to be at least $5 million. If an entity’s amend Title 17, Chapter II of the Code AGENCY
market value of publicly held shares of Federal Regulations as follows:
were at least $5 million, it is reasonable 40 CFR Part 52
to believe that its assets generally would PART 230—GENERAL RULES AND
REGULATIONS, SECURITIES ACT OF [EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0656; FRL–9965–13–
be worth more than $5 million. Region 4]
Therefore, an entity seeking to list 1933
securities on IEX pursuant to IEX’s Air Plan Approval; Florida:
■ 1. The authority citation for part 230
listing standards generally would have Unnecessary Rule Removal
continues to read, in part, as follows:
assets with a market value of more than
$5 million and thus would not be a Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77b, 77b note, 77c, AGENCY: Environmental Protection
small entity. 77d, 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77r, 77s, 77z–3, 77sss, Agency (EPA).
78c, 78d, 78j, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78o–7 note, ACTION: Proposed rule.
Accordingly, the Commission hereby 78t, 78w, 78ll(d), 78mm, 80a–8, 80a–24, 80a–
certifies, pursuant to Section 605(b) of 28, 80a–29, 80a–30, and 80a–37, and Pub. L. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
the Regulatory Flexibility Act,94 that 112–106, sec. 201(a), sec. 401, 126 Stat. 313 Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
amending Rule 146(b) as proposed (2012), unless otherwise noted. revision to the Florida State
would not have a significant economic * * * * * Implementation Plan submitted by the
impact on a substantial number of small ■ 2. Amend § 230.146 by revising Florida Department of Environmental
entities. The Commission encourages paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) to read as Protection on February 20, 2013. The
written comments regarding this follows: revision removes unnecessary and
certification. The Commission solicits superseded rules from the Florida State
§ 230.146 Rules under section 18 of the
comment as to whether the proposed Act. Implementation Plan. Specifically, this
amendment to Rule 146(b) could have revision removes non-regulatory
an effect that has not been considered. * * * * * introductory language, as well as a
The Commission requests that (b) * * * regulation that has been superseded by
commenters describe the nature of any (1) For purposes of Section 18(b) of more stringent federal regulations. This
impact on small entities and provide the Act (15 U.S.C. 77r), the Commission action is being taken pursuant to the
empirical data to support the extent of finds that the following national Clean Air Act.
such impact. securities exchanges, or segments or
DATES: Written comments must be
tiers thereof, have listing standards that
VIII. Small Business Regulatory are substantially similar to those of the received on or before August 21, 2017.
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’), ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
the NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
For purposes of the Small Business American’’), or the National Market OAR–2016–0656 at http://
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, a rule System of the Nasdaq Stock Market www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
is ‘‘major’’ if it results or is likely to (‘‘Nasdaq/NGM’’), and that securities instructions for submitting comments.
result in: listed, or authorized for listing, on such Once submitted, comments cannot be
1. An annual effect on the economy of exchanges shall be deemed covered edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
$100 million or more; securities: EPA may publish any comment received
(i) Tier I of the NYSE Arca, Inc.; to its public docket. Do not submit
2. a major increase in costs or prices electronically any information you
for consumers or individual industries; (ii) Tier I of the NASDAQ PHLX LLC;
(iii) The Chicago Board Options consider to be Confidential Business
or Information (CBI) or other information
Exchange, Incorporated;
3. significant adverse effects on (iv) Options listed on Nasdaq ISE, whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
competition, investment, or innovation. LLC; Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
95 etc.) must be accompanied by a written
(v) The Nasdaq Capital Market;
(vi) Tier I and Tier II of Bats BZX comment. The written comment is
The Commission requests comment
Exchange, Inc.; and considered the official comment and
regarding the potential impact of the
(vii) Investors Exchange LLC. should include discussion of all points
proposed amendment on the economy
(2) The designation of securities in you wish to make. EPA will generally
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

on an annual basis. Commenters should
paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (vii) of this not consider comments or comment
provide empirical data to support their
section as covered securities is contents located outside of the primary
views to the extent possible.
conditioned on such exchanges’ listing submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
93 17
standards (or segments or tiers thereof) other file sharing system). For
CFR 240.0–10(e).
94 5 continuing to be substantially similar to additional submission methods, the full
U.S.C. 605(b).
95 Public Law 104–121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 EPA public comment policy,
(1996) (codified in various sections of 5 U.S.C., 15 96 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq. information about CBI or multimedia
U.S.C., and as a note to 5 U.S.C. 601). 97 15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(1)(B) and 77s(a). submissions, and general guidance on

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Jul 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM 21JYP1

33852 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 139 / Friday, July 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules

making effective comments, please visit Regulatory Information Number (RIN) Regulatory Analysis
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ and title, to the Federal Rulemaking
commenting-epa-dockets. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Portal at: http://www.regulations.gov.
Planning and Review, and Executive
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All submissions received must
Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
include the agency name and docket Regulatory Review
Management Section, Air Planning and number or RIN for this document. The
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
general policy for comments and other
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. direct agencies to assess all costs and
submissions from members of the public
Environmental Protection Agency, benefits of available regulatory
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., is to make these submissions available
for public viewing at http:// alternatives and, if regulation is
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr.
www.regulations.gov as they are necessary, to select regulatory
Lakeman can be reached via telephone
received without change, including any approaches that maximize net benefits
at (404) 562–9043 or via electronic mail
at lakeman.sean@epa.gov. personal identifiers or contact (including potential economic,
information. environmental, public health and safety
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Final Rules Section of this Federal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Register, EPA is approving the State’s Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
Timi Kenealy, (703) 603–2100, Email: importance of quantifying both costs
implementation plan revision as a direct
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov. and benefits, of reducing costs, of
final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: harmonizing rules, and of promoting
noncontroversial submittal and flexibility. This rule benefits the public
anticipates no adverse comments. A Background and the United States Government by
detailed rationale for the approval is set providing clear procedures for members
The Committee, operating as the U.S. of the public and Government
forth in the direct final rule. If no AbilityOne Commission, administers
adverse comments are received in employees to follow when official
the AbilityOne Program pursuant to the testimony or official documents,
response to this rule, no further activity
authority of 41 U.S.C. 8501. Through records, files or information are sought
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be this program, employment opportunities from the Committee or from Committee
withdrawn and all public comments are provided to people who are blind or personnel in connection with legal
received will be addressed in a severely disabled through the provisions proceedings. This rule has not been
subsequent final rule based on this of products and services to the Federal designated a significant regulatory
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a Government. action.
second comment period on this Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 301, the head of
document. Any parties interested in Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
an Executive department or military
commenting on this document should department may prescribe regulations Section 202 of the Unfunded
do so at this time. for the government of his department, Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
Dated: July 7, 2017. the conduct of its employees, the (2 U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to
V. Anne Heard, distribution and performance of its assess anticipated costs and benefits
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. business, and the custody, use, and before issuing any rule whose mandates
[FR Doc. 2017–15267 Filed 7–20–17; 8:45 am] preservation of its records, papers, and require spending in any 1 year of $100
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P property. The part does not authorize million in 1995 dollars, updated
withholding information from the annually for inflation. In 2016, that
public or limiting the availability of threshold is approximately $146
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM records to the public. million. This rule will not mandate any
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR The United States Supreme Court requirements for State, local, or tribal
SEVERELY DISABLED held in United States ex rel. Touhy v. governments, nor will it affect private
Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951), that the sector costs.
41 CFR Part 51–11
head of a federal agency may make the Public Law 96–354, Regulatory
RIN 3037–AA04 determination on his/her sole authority Flexibility Act
to produce documents and authorize
Touhy Regulations employee’s testimony in response to a The Committee certifies this proposed
AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From subpoena or other demand for rule is not subject to the Regulatory
People Who Are Blind or Severely information. Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Ch. 6) because
Disabled. it would not, if promulgated, have a
This proposed regulation will govern
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
significant economic impact on a
the Committee’s procedures for
substantial number of small entities.
SUMMARY: The Committee for Purchase authorizing or denying such demands. This rule will provide clarity to U.S.
From People Who Are Blind or Severely In addition to updating this section for Government personnel and outside
Disabled (Committee) is proposing the Touhy case, the Committee is taking counsel on the proper rules and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

procedures to use in responding to this opportunity to make technical procedures to serve process on U.S.
subpoenas or other official demands for corrections to include changes to the Government officials in their official
information and testimony served upon mailing address and changing ‘‘JWOD’’ capacity and to obtain official U.S.
itself or its employees. to ‘‘AbilityOne’’ the operating name of Government testimony or documents for
DATES: Comments must be received by the agency since 2010. Changes to this use in legal proceedings. Therefore, the
September 19, 2017. section of the CFR were last made in Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 1994. does not require the Committee to
identified by docket number and/or prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Jul 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM 21JYP1

Document Created: 2017-07-21 06:00:38
Document Modified: 2017-07-21 06:00:38

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Proposed rule.
Dates		Written comments must be received on or before August 21, 2017.
Contact		Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Lakeman can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9043 or via electronic mail at [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 33851