82_FR_34692 82 FR 34551 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Border Security Technology Consortium

82 FR 34551 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Border Security Technology Consortium

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 141 (July 25, 2017)

Page Range34551-34552
FR Document2017-15584

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34551-34552]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Border Security Technology Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 8, 2017, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Border Security Technology 
Consortium (``BSTC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, AeroVironment, Inc., SimiValley, CA; AirRobot US, Inc., 
Arlington, VA; Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA), Albuquerque, 
NM; Aventura Technologies, Inc., Hauppauge, NY; C Speed, LLC, 
Liverpool, NY; Capgemini Government Solutions, LLC, Herndon, VA; CCSN, 
LLC, Guynabo, P.R.; Chartis Consulting Corporation, Falls Church, VA; 
Commdex Consulting, LLC, Norcross, GA; CONVERUS, Inc., Lehi, UT; Drone 
Co-Habitation Services, LLC, Herndon, VA; Elbit Systems of America, 
Inc., McLean, VA; EnZoo, Inc., Woodinville, WA; Exelis, Inc., Fort 
Wayne, IN; FLIR Detection, Inc., Arlington, VA; Georgia Tech Applied 
Research Corporation, Atlanta, GA; Guidepost Solutions, LLC, New York, 
NY; HiTech Systems, Inc., D.B.A. Pulsiam, Los Angeles, CA; ICF, 
Fairfax, VA; IEC Infrared Systems, Middleburg Heights, OH; Innovative 
Wireless Technologies, Lynchburg, VA; International Business Machines 
Corporation (IBM), Bethesda, MD; Leidos, Reston, VA; Logos 
Technologies, LLC, Fairfax, VA; Lukos, LLC, Tampa, FL; Michael Baker 
Jr., Inc., Phoenix, AZ; Polaris Sensor Technologies, Huntsville, AL; 
Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC), McLean, VA; Priority 5 Holdings, Inc., 
Needham, MA; Rajant, Malvern, PA; Red Team Defense Group, Spring 
Branch, TX; Rhombus Power, Inc., Moffett Field, CA; Salient Federal 
Solutions, Fairfax, VA; SRI International, Menlo Park, CA; Stark 
Aerospace, Arlington, VA; StrongWatch Corporation, Tucson, AZ; 
TigerSwan, Inc., Apex, NC; Toyon Research Corporation, Goleta, CA; 
Unmanned Experts, Inc., Denver, CO; Unmanned Solutions Technology, LLC, 
Beavercreek, OH; USTETA, Washington, DC; ViON Corporation, Herndon, VA; 
and XLA Associates, Springfield, VA, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, ADDSS Incorporated, Tucson, AZ; Azos AI LLC, Haymarket, VA; 
Digital Barriers Services, LTD, London, UK; Hurley IR, Mount Airy, MD; 
ICS Consulting, LLC, Arlington, VA; ICx Tactical Platforms, Forest 
Park, GA; Morpho Detection, Newark, CA; Morpho Trak, Alexandria, VA; 
NAVISTAR, Lisle, IL; ProQual-I.T., Inc., Rockville, MD; Rapiscan 
Systems, Torrence, CA; Symetrica, Maynard, MA; University of Arizona, 
Tucson, AZ; and Whitney Bradley & Brown, Inc., Reston, VA, have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and BSTC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

[[Page 34552]]

    On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 18, 
2012 (77 FR 36292).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 5, 
2012. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 6, 2012 (77 FR 66635).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-15584 Filed 7-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices 34551 Office of the Chancellor, Long Beach, Deformation in the Permian Strata of Arlington, VA; Applied Research CA; Cerego, San Francisco, CA; Data Texas and New Mexico: Implications for Associates, Inc. (ARA), Albuquerque, Recognition Corp., Maple Grove, MN; Exploitation of the Permian Basin NM; Aventura Technologies, Inc., Digitalme, Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM; (‘‘Permian Basin’’) has filed written Hauppauge, NY; C Speed, LLC, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN; notifications simultaneously with the Liverpool, NY; Capgemini Government Learning Machine, Dallas, TX; School Attorney General and the Federal Trade Solutions, LLC, Herndon, VA; CCSN, District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Commission disclosing changes in its LLC, Guynabo, P.R.; Chartis Consulting PA; Seattle Public Schools, Seattle, WA; membership. The notifications were Corporation, Falls Church, VA; South Carolina Department of filed for the purpose of extending the Commdex Consulting, LLC, Norcross, Education, Columbia, SC; and Galena Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of GA; CONVERUS, Inc., Lehi, UT; Drone Park Independent School District, antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages Co-Habitation Services, LLC, Herndon, Houston, TX, have been added as under specified circumstances. VA; Elbit Systems of America, Inc., parties to this venture. Specifically, Diamondback E&P LLC, McLean, VA; EnZoo, Inc., Woodinville, Also, Intersective, Sydney, Midland, TX; and Noble Energy, Inc., WA; Exelis, Inc., Fort Wayne, IN; FLIR AUSTRALIA; Intel, Santa Clara, CA; Houston, TX, have been added as Detection, Inc., Arlington, VA; Georgia and Utah Valley University, Orem, UT, parties to this venture. Tech Applied Research Corporation, have withdrawn as parties to this No other changes have been made in Atlanta, GA; Guidepost Solutions, LLC, venture. either the membership or planned New York, NY; HiTech Systems, Inc., In addition, an existing member, activity of the group research project. D.B.A. Pulsiam, Los Angeles, CA; ICF, CODE–OUJ, has changed its name to Membership in this group research Fairfax, VA; IEC Infrared Systems, Online Education Center of OUJ, Chiba, project remains open, and Permian Middleburg Heights, OH; Innovative JAPAN. Basin intends to file additional written Wireless Technologies, Lynchburg, VA; No other changes have been made in notifications disclosing all changes in International Business Machines either the membership or planned membership. Corporation (IBM), Bethesda, MD; activity of the group research project. On April 18, 2017, Permian Basin Leidos, Reston, VA; Logos Technologies, Membership in this group research filed its original notification pursuant to LLC, Fairfax, VA; Lukos, LLC, Tampa, project remains open, and IMS Global Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department FL; Michael Baker Jr., Inc., Phoenix, AZ; intends to file additional written of Justice published a notice in the Polaris Sensor Technologies, Huntsville, notifications disclosing all changes in Federal Register pursuant to Section AL; Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC), membership. 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 2017 (82 FR McLean, VA; Priority 5 Holdings, Inc., On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its 22159). Needham, MA; Rajant, Malvern, PA; original notification pursuant to Section The last notification was filed with Red Team Defense Group, Spring 6(a) of the Act. The Department of the Department on May 17, 2017. A Branch, TX; Rhombus Power, Inc., Justice published a notice in the Federal notice was published in the Federal Moffett Field, CA; Salient Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Solutions, Fairfax, VA; SRI Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR Act on June 20, 2017 (82 FR 28092). International, Menlo Park, CA; Stark 55283). Aerospace, Arlington, VA; StrongWatch Patricia A. Brink, The last notification was filed with Corporation, Tucson, AZ; TigerSwan, the Department on April 19, 2017. A Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. Inc., Apex, NC; Toyon Research notice was published in the Federal Corporation, Goleta, CA; Unmanned [FR Doc. 2017–15582 Filed 7–24–17; 8:45 am] Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Experts, Inc., Denver, CO; Unmanned Act on May 2, 2017 (82 FR 20488). BILLING CODE P Solutions Technology, LLC, Patricia A. Brink, Beavercreek, OH; USTETA, Washington, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DC; ViON Corporation, Herndon, VA; Division. and XLA Associates, Springfield, VA, [FR Doc. 2017–15583 Filed 7–24–17; 8:45 a.m.] Antitrust Division have been added as parties to this BILLING CODE P venture. Notice Pursuant to the National Also, ADDSS Incorporated, Tucson, Cooperative Research and Production AZ; Azos AI LLC, Haymarket, VA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Act of 1993—Border Security Digital Barriers Services, LTD, London, Technology Consortium UK; Hurley IR, Mount Airy, MD; ICS Antitrust Division Notice is hereby given that, on June 8, Consulting, LLC, Arlington, VA; ICx 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Tactical Platforms, Forest Park, GA; Notice Pursuant to the National Morpho Detection, Newark, CA; Morpho National Cooperative Research and Cooperative Research and Production Trak, Alexandria, VA; NAVISTAR, Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 Act of 1993—Cooperative Research Lisle, IL; ProQual-I.T., Inc., Rockville, et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Border Security Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and MD; Rapiscan Systems, Torrence, CA; Technology Consortium (‘‘BSTC’’) has Natural Deformation in the Permian Symetrica, Maynard, MA; University of filed written notifications Strata of Texas and New Mexico: Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Whitney simultaneously with the Attorney Implications for Exploitation of the Bradley & Brown, Inc., Reston, VA, have General and the Federal Trade Permian Basin withdrawn as parties to this venture. Commission disclosing changes in its mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Notice is hereby given that, on June membership. The notifications were No other changes have been made in 22, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the filed for the purpose of extending the either the membership or planned National Cooperative Research and Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of activity of the group research project. Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages Membership in this group research et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Southwest Research under specified circumstances. project remains open, and BSTC intends Institute—Cooperative Research Group Specifically, AeroVironment, Inc., to file additional written notifications on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural SimiValley, CA; AirRobot US, Inc., disclosing all changes in membership. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:30 Jul 24, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1

34552 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its asserted that Registrant’s registration Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Int’l Interlink, original notification pursuant to Section was subject to revocation based on his 284 F.3d 1007, 1017–18 (9th Cir. 2002); 6(a) of the Act. The Department of lack of state authority. Id. at 2. Snyder, et al. v. Alternate Energy Inc., Justice published a notice in the Federal The Government attempted to serve 857 N.Y.S. 2d 442, 447–449 (N.Y. Civ. Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the the Order to Show Cause on Registrant Ct. 2008); In re International Telemedia Act on June 18, 2012 (77 FR 36292). through a variety of ways. These Associates, Inc., 245 B.R. 713, 721–22 The last notification was filed with included: (1) Mailing by first class mail (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2000); see also Richard the Department on October 5, 2012. A addressed to him at his registered C. Quigley, 79 FR 50945 (2014); Emilio notice was published in the Federal address; (2) a Diversion Investigator (DI) Luna, 77 FR 4829, 4830 (2012). Given Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the going to his registered address, where he the multiple attempts by the Act on November 6, 2012 (77 FR 66635). was told that Registrant ‘‘had not Government to serve the Show Cause worked there for a very long time’’ and Order by conventional means, including Patricia A. Brink, his current location was unknown; (3) by mailing it to the address where he Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust the DI going to Registrant’s purported Division. receives his property tax bills, I residence on Laird Drive in Bristol, conclude that the Government’s use of [FR Doc. 2017–15584 Filed 7–24–17; 8:45 am] Connecticut where no one answered the email satisfies its obligation with BILLING CODE P door; 3 (4) mailing the Show Cause respect to service of the Show Cause Order by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Order. See, e.g., Jones v. Flowers, 547 Requested, addressed to him at his U.S. 220, 226 (2006) (due process does DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE registered address; (5) mailing the Show not require actual notice but only Cause Order by Certified Mail, Return ‘‘‘notice reasonably calculated, under all Drug Enforcement Administration Receipt Requested, to his purported the circumstances, to apprise interested Mohammed S. Aljanaby, M.D.; Decision residence address; (6) mailing the Show parties of the pendency of the action and Order Cause Order by Certified Mail, Return and afford them an opportunity to Receipt Requested, to a second property present their objections.’ ’’ Id. (quoting On February 10, 2017, the Assistant in Bristol, Connecticut, which is Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Administrator, Division of Diversion purportedly owned by Registrant; (7) Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950)). Control, Drug Enforcement mailing the Show Cause Order by On May 8, 2017, the Government Administration, issued an Order to Certified Mail, Return Receipt submitted a Request for Final Agency Show Cause to Mohammed S. Aljanaby, Requested, to an address in New York Action. Therein, it represents that M.D. (hereinafter, Registrant),1 of West State where he receives his property tax Registrant did not request a hearing or Hartford, Connecticut. Show Cause bill from the Town of Bristol; and (8) submit a written statement while Order, at 1. The Show Cause Order email sent to an address obtained from waiving his right to a hearing. The proposed the revocation of Registrant’s a public access database maintained by Government thus seeks a final order DEA Certificate of Registration, on the Thomson Reuters, which also revoking Registrant’s registration. ground that he does not have authority corresponds to the email address I deny the Government’s Request for to handle controlled substances in Registrant provided to the Connecticut an Order of Revocation. As support for Connecticut, the State in which he is Board. GX 3, at 1–2 (DI Declaration). the proposed revocation, the registered with DEA. Id. The first mailing was accomplished on Government submitted a copy of the As to the Agency’s jurisdiction, the February 10, 2017; the other attempts at Board’s Order revoking Registrant’s state Show Cause Order alleged that service were made on February 22–23, license, which states that it was actually Registrant possesses a practitioner’s 2017. Id.; see also GX 4 (Declaration of issued on the ‘‘15th day of November, registration for schedules II through V, Chief Counsel Analyst). 2016.’’ GX 3, Appendix C, at 9. and that his registered address is 74 With the exception of the mailing to However, as noted above, the Show Park Road, West Hartford, Connecticut. his registered address (where he no Cause Order alleges that the Board Id. The Order further alleged that longer worked), each of the other revoked his state license ‘‘[o]n Registrant’s registration ‘‘expires by its mailings was returned to the November 15, 2017.’’ See GX 2, at 1. I own terms on June 30, 2017.’’ Id. Government and marked as need not decide, however, whether this As to the substantive ground for the undelivered. GX 3, at 2. The typographical error renders the Show proposed action, the Show Cause Order Government represents, however, that Cause Order defective as this case is alleged that ‘‘[o]n November 15, 2017, the attempt to email the Show Cause now moot.4 the State of Connecticut Medical Order did not generate an error or As noted above, the Show Cause Examining Board revoked [his] license undeliverable message. Of note, several courts have held that Order alleges that Registrant’s to practice medicine due to [his] (1) the emailing of process can, depending registration was due to expire on June inappropriate physical and/or sexual on the facts and circumstances, satisfy 30, 2017. Id. According to the conduct with one or more female due process, especially where service by registration records of the Agency of patients; and (2) false statements on [his] Connecticut medical license conventional means is impracticable 4 Had Registrant requested a hearing, the renewal application.’’ Id. (emphasis because a person secretes himself. See Government could have corrected its error as to the added). The Show Cause Order also date of the Board’s Order by motion. And by alleged that the Board’s ‘‘order remains and the consequence of failing to elect either offering the Board’s Order to support a motion for option. Show Cause Order, at 2. The Order also summary disposition, the Government would have in effect.’’ Id.2 The Order further mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES notified Registrant of his right to submit a refuted any claim of prejudice. Cf. United States v. Corrective Action Plan. Id. at 2–3 (citing 21 U.S.C. Cina, 699 F.2d 853, 857 (7th Cir. 1983) (holding in 1 Notwithstanding that Dr. Aljanaby is now an ex- 824(c)(2)(C)). criminal prosecution that trial court’s amendment registrant, he is referred to as Registrant throughout 3 According to the Connecticut Medical of the alleged commencement date of conspiracy this Decision. Examining Board’s Order, when the Board charge by two years did not ‘‘affect[] a ‘material 2 The Show Cause Order also notified Registrant attempted to served Registrant at this address its element’ of the . . . charge, causing prejudice to the of his right to request a hearing or to submit a mailing was returned and marked: ‘‘Return to defendant’’). Furthermore, as long as the Board’s written statement while waiving his right to a sender, No Such Street, Unable to Forward.’’ GX 3, Order was still in effect, the date of its Order would hearing, the procedure for electing either option, Appendix C, at 3. not be material. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:30 Jul 24, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1


Document Created: 2018-10-24 11:20:51
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 11:20:51
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation82 FR 34551 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR