82 FR 34557 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Enhance Anti-Internalization Functionality
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 141 (July 25, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 141 (July 25, 2017)
| Page Range | 34557-34559 | |
| FR Document | 2017-15530 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 34557-34559] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-15530] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-81171; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2017-069] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Enhance Anti-Internalization Functionality July 19, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on July 6, 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Chapter VI, Section 10 of the rules of the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM'') to enhance anti-internalization functionality. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. [[Page 34558]] II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to enhance the anti- internalization (``AIQ'') functionality provided to market makers on NOM by giving members the flexibility to choose to have this protection apply at the market participant identifier (``MPID'') level (i.e., existing functionality), at the Exchange account level, or at the member firm level. The Exchange believes that this enhancement will provide helpful flexibility for market making firms that wish to prevent trading against all quotes and orders entered by their firm, or Exchange account, instead of just quotes and orders that are entered under the same MPID. Currently, the Exchange provides mandatory AIQ functionality whereby quotes and orders entered by market makers using the same MPID are not executed against quotes and orders entered on the opposite side of the market by the same market maker using the same identifier.\3\ When a quote or order entered by a market maker would trade with other quotes or orders from the same market maker, the trading system cancels the oldest of the quotes or orders back to the entering party prior to execution.\4\ AIQ assists market makers in reducing trading costs from unwanted executions potentially resulting from the interaction of executable buy and sell trading interest from the same firm when performing the same market making function. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Chapter VI, Section 10. \4\ Id. A quote or order entered by a market maker only triggers AIQ when it would trade with other quotes or orders from the same market maker. Thus, an incoming quote or order entered by a market maker may interact with other interest with priority on the book prior to triggering AIQ. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today, this protection prevents market makers from trading against their own quotes and orders at the MPID level. The proposed enhancement to this functionality would allow members to choose to have this protection applied at the MPID level as implemented today, at the Exchange account level, or at the member firm level. If members choose to have this protection applied at the Exchange account level, AIQ would prohibit quotes and orders from different MPIDs associated with the same Exchange account from trading against one another. Similarly, if the members choose to have this protection applied at the member firm level, AIQ would prohibit quotes and orders from different MPIDs within the member firm from trading against one another. Members that do not select to have this protection applied at the Exchange account level or member firm level will have their AIQ protection defaulted to the MPID level protection applied today. The Exchange believes that the proposed AIQ enhancement will provide members with more tailored self- trade functionality that allows them to manage their trading as appropriate based on the members' business needs. While the Exchange believes that some firms will want to restrict AIQ to trading against interest from the same MPID--i.e., as implemented today--the Exchange believes that other firms will find it helpful to be able to configure AIQ to apply at the Exchange account level or at the member firm level so that they are protected regardless of which MPID the order or quote originated from. Similar functionality also exists on the BATS BZX Exchange (``BZX''), which provides members the ability to apply Match Trade Prevention (``MTP'') modifiers--i.e., BZX's version of self-trade protection--based on MPID, Exchange Member, trading group, or Exchange Sponsored Participant identifiers.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See BZX Rule 21.1(g). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The examples below illustrate how AIQ would operate based on the MPID level protection, the Exchange account level, or for members that choose to apply AIQ at the member firm level: Example 1 1. Member ABC (MPID 123A & 555B) with AIQ configured at the MPID level. 2. 123A Quote: $1.00 (5) x $1.10 (20). 3. 555B Buy Order entered for 10 contracts at $1.10. 4. 555B Buy Order executes 10 contracts against 123A Quote. 123A and 555B are permitted trade against one another because Member ABC has configured AIQ to apply at the MPID level. This is the same as existing functionality. Example 2 1. Member ABC (Account 999 with MPIDs 123A and 555B, and Account 888 with MPID 789A) with AIQ configured at the Exchange account level. 2. 123A Quote: $1.00 (5) x $1.10 (20). 3. 789A Quote: $1.05(10) x $1.10 (20). 4. 555B Buy Order entered for 30 contracts at $1.10. 5. 555B Buy Order executes against 789A Quote but 555B Buy Order does not execute against 123A Quote. AIQ purges the 123A Quote and the remaining contracts of the 555B Buy Order rests on the book at $1.10. 123A and 555B are not permitted trade against one another because Member ABC has configured AIQ to apply at the Exchange account level. This is new functionality as the member has opted to have AIQ operate at the Exchange account level. Example 3 1. Same as Example 2 above but Member ABC has AIQ configured at the member level. 2. AIQ purges the 123A Quote and the 789A Quote and the 555B Buy Order rests on the book at $1.10. This is new functionality as the member has opted to have AIQ operate at the member level. Implementation The Exchange proposes to launch the AIQ functionality described in this proposed rule change in either Q3 or Q4 2017. The Exchange will announce the implementation date of this functionality in an Options Trader Alert issued to members prior to the launch date. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ In particular, the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ because it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with [[Page 34559]] the protection of investors and the public interest as it is designed to provide NOM market makers with additional flexibility with respect to how to implement self-trade protections provided by AIQ. Currently, all market makers are provided functionality that prevents quotes and orders from one MPID from trading with quotes and orders from the same MPID. This allows market makers to better manage their order flow and prevent undesirable executions where the market maker, using the same MIPID, would be on both sides of the trade. While this functionality is helpful to our members, some members would prefer not to trade with quotes and orders entered by different MPIDs within the same Exchange account or member. Thus, the Exchange is proposing to provide members with flexibility with respect to how AIQ is implemented. While members that like the current functionality can continue to use it, members who would prefer to prevent self-trades across different MPIDs within the same Exchange account or at the member level will now be provided with functionality that lets them do this. Similar functionality also exists on BZX,\8\ and the Exchange believes that flexibility to apply AIQ at the Exchange account or member firm level would be useful for NOM members too. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade and will remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market as it will further enhance self-trade protections provided to NOM market makers similar to those protections provided on other markets. This functionality does not relieve or otherwise modify the duty of best execution owed to orders received from public customers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See supra note 5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\9\ the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is designed to enhance AIQ functionality provided to NOM market makers, and will benefit members that wish to protect their quotes and orders against trading with other quotes and orders within the same Exchange account or member, rather than the more limited MPID standard applied today. The new functionality, which is similar to functionality already provided on BZX, is also completely voluntary, and members that wish to use the current functionality can also continue to do so. The Exchange does not believe that providing more flexibility to members will have any significant impact on competition. In fact, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is evidence of the competitive environment in the options industry where exchanges must continually improve their offerings to maintain competitive standing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-069 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-069. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-069 and should be submitted on or before August 15, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-15530 Filed 7-24-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices 34557
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1. The title of the information numbers 3150–0003, 3150–0004, 3150–
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by collection: 10 CFR part 75, ‘‘Information 0057, and 3150–0058. The NRC needs
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The Collection: Safeguards on Nuclear this information to implement its
supporting statement is available in Material—Implementation of United responsibilities under the US/IAEA
ADAMS under Accession No. States/International Atomic Energy agreement. The NRC is not submitting
ML17173A062. Agency Agreement’’. the information collections associated
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 2. OMB approval number: 3150–0055. with the modified Small Quantities
purchase copies of public documents at 3. Type of submission: Extension. Protocol to OMB at this time. A separate
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 4. The form number if applicable: Not 30-day notice will be published prior to
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville applicable. submitting the information collections
5. How often the collection is required associated with the final rule.
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
or requested: Selected licensees are
• NRC’s Clearance Officer: A copy of Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day
required to provide reports of nuclear
the collection of information and related of July 2017.
material inventory and flow for selected
instructions may be obtained without For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
facilities under the US/IAEA Safeguards
charge by contacting the NRC’s Commission.
Agreement, permit inspections by
Clearance Officer, David Cullison, David Cullison,
International Atomic Energy Agency
Office of the Chief Information Officer, Clearance Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Agreement (IAEA) inspectors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Commission, Office of the Chief Information
complementary access of IAEA
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: Officer.
inspectors under the Additional
301–415–2084; email: [FR Doc. 2017–15540 Filed 7–24–17; 8:45 am]
Protocol, give immediate notice to the
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
NRC in specified situations involving BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
B. Submitting Comments. the possibility of loss of nuclear
material, and give notice for imports
The NRC cautions you not to include
and exports of specified amounts of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
identifying or contact information in
nuclear material. Reporting is done COMMISSION
comment submissions that you do not
when specified events occur.
want to be publicly disclosed in your
Recordkeeping for nuclear material [Release No. 34–81171; File No. SR–
comment submission. All comment
accounting and control information is NASDAQ–2017–069]
submissions are posted at http://
done in accordance with specific
www.regulations.gov and entered into
instructions. Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
ADAMS. Comment submissions are not 6. Who will be required or asked to NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
routinely edited to remove identifying respond: Licensees of facilities on the Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
or contact information. U.S. eligible list who have been selected Proposed Rule Change To Enhance
If you are requesting or aggregating by the IAEA for reporting or Anti-Internalization Functionality
comments from other persons for recordkeeping activities.
submission to the OMB, then you 7. The estimated number of annual July 19, 2017.
should inform those persons not to responses: 7 (2 reporting responses + 5 Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
include identifying or contact recordkeepers). Securities Exchange Act of 1934
information that they do not want to be 8. The estimated number of annual (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
publicly disclosed in their comment respondents: 5. notice is hereby given that on July 6,
submission. Your request should state 9. An estimate of the total number of 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
that comment submissions are not hours needed annually to comply with (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
routinely edited to remove such the information collection requirement Securities and Exchange Commission
information before making the comment or request: 3,960. (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
submissions available to the public or 10. Abstract: Part 75 of Title 10 of the rule change as described in Items I, II,
entering the comment into ADAMS. Code of Federal Regulations, requires and III, below, which Items have been
selected licensees to provide reports of prepared by the Exchange. The
II. Background
nuclear material inventory and flow for Commission is publishing this notice to
Under the provisions of the selected facilities under the US/IAEA solicit comments on the proposed rule
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Safeguards Agreement, permit change from interested persons.
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the NRC recently inspections by IAEA inspectors,
submitted a request for renewal of an complementary access of IAEA I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
existing collection of information to inspectors under the Additional Statement of the Terms of Substance of
OMB for review entitled, ‘‘Information Protocol, give immediate notice to the the Proposed Rule Change
Collection: Safeguards on Nuclear NRC in specified situations involving The Exchange proposes to amend
Material—Implementation of United the possibility of loss of nuclear Chapter VI, Section 10 of the rules of the
States/International Atomic Energy material, and give notice for imports NASDAQ Options Market (‘‘NOM’’) to
Agency Agreement.’’ The NRC hereby and exports of specified amounts of enhance anti-internalization
informs potential respondents that an nuclear material. Licensees will also functionality.
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and follow written material accounting and The text of the proposed rule change
that a person is not required to respond control procedures, although actual is available on the Exchange’s Web site
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
to, a collection of information unless it reporting of transfer and material at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at
displays a currently valid OMB control balance records to the IAEA will be the principal office of the Exchange, and
number. done through the U.S. State system of at the Commission’s Public Reference
The NRC published a Federal accounting for and control of nuclear Room.
Register notice with a 60-day comment material (Nuclear Materials
period on this information collection on Management and Safeguards System, 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
April 6, 2017 (82 FR 16862). collected under OMB clearance 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:30 Jul 24, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_34698/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices 34559
the protection of investors and the applied today. The new functionality, Electronic Comments
public interest as it is designed to which is similar to functionality already
provide NOM market makers with provided on BZX, is also completely • Use the Commission’s Internet
additional flexibility with respect to voluntary, and members that wish to comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
how to implement self-trade protections use the current functionality can also rules/sro.shtml); or
provided by AIQ. Currently, all market continue to do so. The Exchange does • Send an email to rule-comments@
makers are provided functionality that not believe that providing more sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
prevents quotes and orders from one flexibility to members will have any NASDAQ–2017–069 on the subject line.
MPID from trading with quotes and significant impact on competition. In
orders from the same MPID. This allows fact, the Exchange believes that the Paper Comments
market makers to better manage their proposed rule change is evidence of the
order flow and prevent undesirable • Send paper comments in triplicate
competitive environment in the options
executions where the market maker, to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
industry where exchanges must
using the same MIPID, would be on both continually improve their offerings to Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
sides of the trade. While this maintain competitive standing. Washington, DC 20549–1090.
functionality is helpful to our members, All submissions should refer to File
some members would prefer not to trade C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the Number SR–NASDAQ–2017–069. This
with quotes and orders entered by file number should be included on the
different MPIDs within the same Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others subject line if email is used. To help the
Exchange account or member. Thus, the
Commission process and review your
Exchange is proposing to provide No written comments were either
members with flexibility with respect to comments more efficiently, please use
solicited or received.
how AIQ is implemented. While only one method. The Commission will
members that like the current III. Date of Effectiveness of the post all comments on the Commission’s
functionality can continue to use it, Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
members who would prefer to prevent Commission Action rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
self-trades across different MPIDs Because the foregoing proposed rule submission, all subsequent
within the same Exchange account or at change does not: (i) Significantly affect amendments, all written statements
the member level will now be provided the protection of investors or the public with respect to the proposed rule
with functionality that lets them do this. interest; (ii) impose any significant change that are filed with the
Similar functionality also exists on burden on competition; and (iii) become Commission, and all written
BZX,8 and the Exchange believes that operative for 30 days from the date on communications relating to the
flexibility to apply AIQ at the Exchange which it was filed, or such shorter time proposed rule change between the
account or member firm level would be as the Commission may designate, it has Commission and any person, other than
useful for NOM members too. The become effective pursuant to Section those that may be withheld from the
Exchange believes that the proposed 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 10 and public in accordance with the
rule change is designed to promote just subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4 provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
and equitable principles of trade and thereunder.11 available for Web site viewing and
will remove impediments to and perfect At any time within 60 days of the printing in the Commission’s Public
the mechanisms of a free and open filing of the proposed rule change, the Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
market as it will further enhance self- Commission summarily may Washington, DC 20549, on official
trade protections provided to NOM temporarily suspend such rule change if
market makers similar to those business days between the hours of
it appears to the Commission that such 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
protections provided on other markets. action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
This functionality does not relieve or filing also will be available for
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
otherwise modify the duty of best inspection and copying at the principal
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
execution owed to orders received from office of the Exchange. All comments
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
public customers. If the Commission takes such action, the received will be posted without change;
Commission shall institute proceedings the Commission does not edit personal
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s identifying information from
Statement on Burden on Competition to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved. submissions. You should submit only
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of information that you wish to make
the Act,9 the Exchange does not believe IV. Solicitation of Comments available publicly. All submissions
that the proposed rule change will Interested persons are invited to should refer to File Number SR–
impose any burden on intermarket or submit written data, views, and NASDAQ–2017–069 and should be
intramarket competition that is not arguments concerning the foregoing, submitted on or before August 15, 2017.
necessary or appropriate in furtherance including whether the proposed rule
of the purposes of the Act. The For the Commission, by the Division of
change is consistent with the Act. Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
proposed rule change is designed to Comments may be submitted by any of
enhance AIQ functionality provided to authority.12
the following methods:
NOM market makers, and will benefit Eduardo A. Aleman,
members that wish to protect their
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). Assistant Secretary.
quotes and orders against trading with 11 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– [FR Doc. 2017–15530 Filed 7–24–17; 8:45 am]
other quotes and orders within the same 4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Exchange account or member, rather the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
than the more limited MPID standard prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
8 See supra note 5. Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). requirement. 12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:30 Jul 24, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_34698/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-24 11:22:44
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 11:22:44
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 34557 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR