82 FR 37939 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend ISE's Schedule of Fees With Respect to the Options Regulatory Fee

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 155 (August 14, 2017)

Page Range		37939-37942
FR Document		2017-17050
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 155 (Monday, August 14, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 155 (Monday, August 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37939-37942]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81345; File No. SR-ISE-2017-71]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend ISE's 
Schedule of Fees With Respect to the Options Regulatory Fee

August 8, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on July 26, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to revise ISE's Schedule of Fees to: (i) Make 
adjustments to the amount of the Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF''); (ii) 
more closely reflect the manner in which ISE assesses and collects its 
ORF; and (iii) remove rule text related to the timing when the Exchange 
may increase or decrease the amount of the ORF.
    While the changes proposed herein are effective upon filing, the 
Exchange has designated the amendments [sic] become operative on August 
1, 2017.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    ISE initially filed to establish its ORF in 2010.\3\ The Exchange 
has amended its ORF several times since the inception of this fee.\4\ 
At this time, the Exchange proposes to: (i) Amend the amount of its 
ORF; (ii) more closely reflect the manner in which ISE assesses and 
collects its ORF; and (iii) remove rule text related to the timing when 
the Exchange may increase or decrease the amount of its ORF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 61154 (December 11, 
2009), 74 FR 67278 (December 18, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-105) (Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating 
to the Registered Representative Fee and an Options Regulatory Fee).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 62012 (April 30, 
2010), 75 FR 25306 (May 7, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-36); 67087 (May 31, 
2012), 77 FR 33535 (June 6, 2012) (SR-ISE-2012-43); and 70859 
(November 13, 2013), 78 FR 69501 (November 19, 2013) (SR-ISE-2014-
54).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange supports a common approach for the assessment and 
collection of ORF among the various options exchanges that assess such 
a fee. Furthermore, the Exchange supports guidance from the Commission 
regarding regulatory cost structures to ensure equal knowledge and 
treatment among options markets assessing ORF.
Proposal 1--Amend the Amount of the ORF
    The Exchange assesses an ORF of $0.0039 per contract side. The 
Exchange proposes to decrease the ORF from $0.0039 per contract side to 
$0.0016 per contract side as of August 1, 2017 to account for synergies 
which resulted from Nasdaq's acquisition of the Exchange. On June 30, 
2016, Nasdaq completed its acquisition of the International Securities 
Exchange, which included acquiring three electronic options 
exchanges.\5\ With the acquisition, ISE [sic] regulatory program has 
been examined and conformed to certain best practices which exist today 
on NASDAQ PHLX LLC, The NASDAQ Options Market LLC and NASDAQ BX, Inc. 
(collectively ``Nasdaq Markets'') and Nasdaq GEMX, LLC. These synergies 
in combination with conforming the expense and revenue review of ISE to 
that of the Nasdaq Markets has resulted in a projected decreased in 
regulatory expenses for ISE and therefore ISE is decreasing the amount 
of its ORF. The Exchange believes that this decreased number reflects 
efficiencies in the regulatory program today within the Nasdaq Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ On June 30, 2016, Nasdaq, Inc. acquired all of the capital 
stock of U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc., the ISE's indirect parent 
company. As a result, ISE in addition to its affiliates, which are 
now known as Nasdaq GEMX, LLC and Nasdaq MRX, LLC, became a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Nasdaq, Inc. See Securities Exchange Act Release 
No. 78119 (June 21, 2016), 81 FR 41611 (June 27, 2016) (SR-ISE-2016-
11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposed change to the ORF should balance the 
Exchange's regulatory cost [sic] against the anticipated revenue. The 
Exchange regularly reviews its ORF to ensure that the ORF, in 
combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed 
regulatory costs. The Exchange believes this adjustment will permit the 
Exchange to cover a material portion of its regulatory costs, while not 
exceeding regulatory costs.
    The Exchange notified members of this ORF adjustment thirty (30) 
calendar days prior to the proposed operative date.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Options Trader Alert #2017-54.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal 2--Reflect the Manner in Which ISE Assesses and Collects its 
ORF
    Currently, ISE assesses its ORF for each customer option 
transaction that is either: (1) Executed by a member on ISE; or (2) 
cleared by a ISE member at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') 
in the customer range,\7\ even if the transaction was executed by a 
non-member of ISE, regardless of the exchange on which the transaction 
occurs.\8\ If the OCC clearing member is a ISE member, ORF is assessed 
and collected on all cleared customer contracts (after adjustment for 
CMTA \9\); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not a ISE member, ORF 
is collected only on the cleared customer contracts executed at ISE, 
taking into account any

[[Page 37940]]

CMTA instructions which may result in collecting the ORF from a non-
member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Members must record the appropriate account origin code on 
all orders at the time of entry in order. The Exchange represents 
that it has surveillances in place to verify that members mark 
orders with the correct account origin code.
    \8\ The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and 
collecting the ORF.
    \9\ CMTA or Clearing Member Trade Assignment is a form of 
``give-up'' whereby the position will be assigned to a specific 
clearing firm at OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By way of example, if Broker A, an ISE member, routes a customer 
order to CBOE and the transaction executes on CBOE and clears in Broker 
A's OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected by ISE from Broker A's 
clearing account at OCC via direct debit. While this transaction was 
executed on a market other than ISE, it was cleared by an ISE member in 
the member's OCC clearing account in the customer range, therefore 
there is a regulatory nexus between ISE and the transaction. If Broker 
A was not an ISE member, then no ORF should be assessed and collected 
because there is no nexus; the transaction did not execute on ISE nor 
was it cleared by an ISE member.
    In the case where a member both executes a transaction and clears 
the transaction, the ORF is assessed to and collected from the member 
only once. In the case where a member executes a transaction and a 
different member clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to and 
collected from the member who clears the transaction and not the member 
who executes the transaction. In the case where a non-member executes a 
transaction at an away market and a member clears the transaction, the 
ORF is assessed to and collected from the member who clears the 
transaction. In the case where a member executes a transaction on ISE 
and a non-member clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to the 
member that executed the transaction and collected from the non-member 
who cleared the transaction. In the case where a member executes a 
transaction at an away market and a non-member clears the transaction, 
the ORF is not assessed to the member who executed the transaction or 
collected from the non-member who cleared the transaction because the 
Exchange does not have access to the data to make absolutely certain 
that ORF should apply. Further, the data does not allow the Exchange to 
identify the member executing the trade at an away market.
ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
    The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF 
to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, 
does not exceed regulatory costs. In determining whether an expense is 
considered a regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes 
determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory 
function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in 
connection with a disciplinary manner offset ORF.
    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to 
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of its members, 
including performing routine surveillances, investigations, 
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, 
interpretive, and enforcement activities.
    The Exchange believes that revenue generated from the ORF, when 
combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees, will cover a 
material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's regulatory costs. The 
Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue collected from 
the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other regulatory 
fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. If the Exchange 
determines regulatory revenues exceed regulatory costs, the Exchange 
will adjust the ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the 
Commission.
    Finally, the Exchange notes that it is amending ISE's Schedule of 
Fees to remove certain rule text and include new rule text to make 
clear the manner in which ORF is assessed and collected on ISE.
Proposal 3--Semi-Annual Changes to ORF
    The Exchange's current ORF rule text provides that, ``The Exchange 
may only increase or decrease the Options Regulatory Fee semi-annually, 
and any such fee change will be effective on the first business day of 
February or August.'' The Exchange is proposing to eliminate the 
requirement that its ORF may be only increased or decreased semi-
annually because the Exchange believes it requires the flexibility to 
amend its ORF as needed to meet its regulatory requirements and adjust 
its ORF to account for the regulatory revenue that it receives and the 
costs that it incurs. While the Exchange is eliminating the requirement 
to adjust only semi-annually, it will continue to submit a rule 
proposal with the Commission for each modification to the ORF and 
notify participants via an Options Trader Alert of any proposed change 
in the amount of the fee at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to 
the effective date. The Exchange believes that the prior notification 
to market participants will provide guidance on the timing of any 
changes to the ORF and ensure market participants are prepared to 
configure their systems to properly account for the ORF.
    The Exchange also notes it now issues Options Trader Alerts instead 
of circulars to provide notification to members. The Exchange is 
amending the rule text to reflect this change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of 
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in particular, in that it 
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and 
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using its 
facility and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed clarifications in the Fee 
Schedule to the ORF further the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the 
Act and are equitable and reasonable since they expressly describe the 
Exchange's existing practices regarding the manner in which the 
Exchange assesses and collects its ORF.
Proposal 1--Amend the Amount of the ORF
    The Exchange believes that decreasing the ORF from $0.0039 per 
contract side to $0.0016 per contract side as of August 1, 2017 is 
reasonable because the Exchange's collection of ORF needs to be 
balanced against the amount of regulatory cost collected [sic] by the 
Exchange. The decrease is a result of synergies among the Nasdaq owned 
self-regulatory organizations. The synergies in combination with 
conforming the expense and revenue review of ISE to that of the Nasdaq 
Markets has resulted in a decreased ORF for ISE. The Exchange believes 
that this decreased number reflects efficiencies in the regulatory 
program today within the Nasdaq Markets. The Exchange's proposed change 
to the ORF should balance the Exchange's regulatory cost against the 
anticipated regulatory revenue. The Exchange regularly reviews its ORF 
to ensure that the ORF, in combination with its other regulatory fees 
and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs.
    The Exchange believes that decreasing the ORF from $0.0039 per 
contract side to $0.0016 per contract side as of August 1, 2017 is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because this decrease will 
serve to balance the Exchange's regulatory revenue against the 
anticipated regulatory costs in light of recent synergies experienced 
from the merger described herein. The ORF seeks to recover the costs of 
supervising and regulating members, including performing routine 
surveillances, investigations, examinations, financial monitoring, and 
policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and enforcement activities.

[[Page 37941]]

    Moreover, the Exchange believes the ORF ensures fairness by 
assessing fees to those members that are directly based on the amount 
of customer options business they conduct. Regulating customer trading 
activity is much more labor intensive and requires greater expenditure 
of human and technical resources than regulating non-customer trading 
activity, which tends to be more automated and less labor-intensive. As 
a result, the costs associated with administering the customer 
component of the Exchange's overall regulatory program are materially 
higher than the costs associated with administering the non-customer 
component (e.g. member proprietary transactions) of its regulatory 
program.
    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs of 
supervising and regulating member's customer options business including 
performing routine surveillances, investigations, examinations, 
financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and 
enforcement activities. The Exchange will monitor the amount of revenue 
collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other 
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total 
regulatory costs. The Exchange has designed the ORF to generate 
revenues that, when combined with all of the Exchange's other 
regulatory fees, will be less than or equal to the Exchange's 
regulatory costs, which is consistent with the Commission's view that 
regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not to support the 
Exchange's business side. In this regard, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed amount of the fee is reasonable.
Proposal 2--Reflect the Manner in Which ISE Assesses and Collects Its 
ORF
    The Exchange believes it is reasonable and appropriate for the 
Exchange to charge the ORF for options transactions regardless of the 
exchange on which the transactions occur. The Exchange has a statutory 
obligation to enforce compliance by members and their associated 
persons under the Act and the rules of the Exchange and to surveil for 
other manipulative conduct by market participants (including non-
members) trading on the Exchange. The Exchange cannot effectively 
surveil for such conduct without looking at and evaluating activity 
across all options markets. Many of the Exchange's market surveillance 
programs require the Exchange to look at and evaluate activity across 
all options markets, such as surveillance for position limit 
violations, manipulation, front-running and contrary exercise advice 
violations/expiring exercise declarations. The Exchange, because it 
lacks access to information on the identity of the entering firm for 
executions that occur on away markets, believes it is appropriate to 
assess the ORF on its member's clearing activity, based on information 
the Exchange receives from OCC, including for away market activity. 
Among other reasons, doing so better and more accurately captures 
activity that occurs away from the Exchange over which the Exchange has 
a degree of regulatory responsibility. In so doing, the Exchange 
believes that assessing ORF on member clearing firms in certain 
instances equitably distributes the collection of ORF in a fair and 
reasonable manner. Also, the Exchange and the other options exchanges 
are required to populate a consolidated options audit trail (``COATS'') 
\12\ system in order to surveil a member's activities across 
markets.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ COATS effectively enhances intermarket options surveillance 
by enabling the options exchanges to reconstruct the market promptly 
to effectively surveil certain rules.
    \13\ In addition to its own surveillance programs, the Exchange 
works with other SROs and exchanges on intermarket surveillance 
related issues. Through its participation in the Intermarket 
Surveillance Group (``ISG''), the Exchange shares information and 
coordinates inquiries and investigations with other exchanges 
designed to address potential intermarket manipulation and trading 
abuses. The Exchange's participation in ISG helps it to satisfy the 
requirement that it has coordinated surveillance with markets on 
which security futures are traded and markets on which any security 
underlying security futures are traded to detect manipulation and 
insider trading. See Section 6(h)(3)(I) of the Act. ISG is an 
industry organization formed in 1983 to coordinate intermarket 
surveillance among the SROs by co-operatively sharing regulatory 
information pursuant to a written agreement between the parties. The 
goal of the ISG's information sharing is to coordinate regulatory 
efforts to address potential intermarket trading abuses and 
manipulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that assessing the ORF to each Exchange 
member for options transactions cleared by OCC in the customer range 
where the execution occurs on another exchange and is cleared by a ISE 
Member is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other 
charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its 
facilities. The ORF is collected by OCC on behalf of ISE from Exchange 
clearing members for all customer transactions they clear or from non-
Members for all customer transactions they clear that were executed on 
ISE. The Exchange believes that this collection practice is reasonable 
and appropriate because higher fees are assessed to those Members that 
require more Exchange regulatory services based on the amount of 
customer options business they conduct.
    Regulating customer trading activity is more labor intensive and 
requires greater expenditure of human and technical resources than 
regulating non-customer trading activity, which tends to be more 
automated and less labor intensive. As a result, the costs associated 
with administering the customer component of the Exchange's overall 
regulatory program are anticipated to be typically higher than the 
costs associated with administering the non-customer component of its 
regulatory program. The Exchange proposes assessing higher fees to 
those members that will require more Exchange regulatory services based 
on the amount of customer options business they conduct. Additionally, 
the dues and fees paid by members go into the general funds of the 
Exchange, a portion of which is used to help pay the costs of 
regulation. The Exchange has in place a regulatory structure to 
surveil, conduct examinations and monitor the marketplace for 
violations of Exchange Rules. The ORF assists the Exchange to fund the 
cost of this regulation of the marketplace.
Proposal 3--Semi-Annual Changes to ORF
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to remove the 
limit to amend the ORF only semi-annually, with advance notice, is 
reasonable because the Exchange will continue to provide market 
participants with thirty (30) days advance notice of amending the 
amount of the ORF. Also, the Exchange is required to monitor the amount 
of revenue collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination 
with its other regulatory fees and fines, do not exceed regulatory 
costs. Therefore, the Exchange believes it is reasonable to remove the 
semi-annual limit to amend its ORF in order to permit the Exchange to 
make amendments to its ORF as necessary to comply with the Exchange's 
obligations. This proposed change would conform this rule with that of 
NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx''), The NASDAQ Options Market LLC (``NOM'') and 
NASDAQ BX, Inc. (``BX'').\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Phlx's Pricing Schedule and NOM and BX Rules at Chapter 
XV, Sections 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to remove the 
limit to amend the ORF only semi-annually, with advance notice, is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will apply in the 
same manner to all members that are subject to the ORF. The Exchange 
has in place a regulatory structure to surveil for, conduct 
examinations and monitor

[[Page 37942]]

the marketplace for violations of Exchange Rules. The ORF assists the 
Exchange to fund the cost of this regulation of the marketplace.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The ORF is not intended to have 
any impact on competition. Rather, it is designed to enable the 
Exchange to recover a material portion of the Exchange's cost related 
to its regulatory activities. The Exchange is obligated to ensure that 
the amount of regulatory revenue collected from the ORF, in combination 
with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory 
costs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\15\ At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in the public 
interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such 
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether 
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File No. SR-ISE-2017-71 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2017-71. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2017-71, and should be 
submitted on or before September 5, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17050 Filed 8-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 155 / Monday, August 14, 2017 / Notices 37941

Moreover, the Exchange believes the and contrary exercise advice violations/ Regulating customer trading activity
ORF ensures fairness by assessing fees expiring exercise declarations. The is more labor intensive and requires
to those members that are directly based Exchange, because it lacks access to greater expenditure of human and
on the amount of customer options information on the identity of the technical resources than regulating non-
business they conduct. Regulating entering firm for executions that occur customer trading activity, which tends
customer trading activity is much more on away markets, believes it is to be more automated and less labor
labor intensive and requires greater appropriate to assess the ORF on its intensive. As a result, the costs
expenditure of human and technical member’s clearing activity, based on associated with administering the
resources than regulating non-customer information the Exchange receives from customer component of the Exchange’s
trading activity, which tends to be more OCC, including for away market overall regulatory program are
automated and less labor-intensive. As a activity. Among other reasons, doing so anticipated to be typically higher than
result, the costs associated with better and more accurately captures the costs associated with administering
administering the customer component activity that occurs away from the the non-customer component of its
of the Exchange’s overall regulatory Exchange over which the Exchange has regulatory program. The Exchange
program are materially higher than the a degree of regulatory responsibility. In proposes assessing higher fees to those
costs associated with administering the so doing, the Exchange believes that members that will require more
non-customer component (e.g. member assessing ORF on member clearing firms Exchange regulatory services based on
proprietary transactions) of its in certain instances equitably distributes the amount of customer options
regulatory program. the collection of ORF in a fair and business they conduct. Additionally, the
The ORF is designed to recover a reasonable manner. Also, the Exchange dues and fees paid by members go into
material portion of the costs of and the other options exchanges are the general funds of the Exchange, a
supervising and regulating member’s required to populate a consolidated portion of which is used to help pay the
customer options business including options audit trail (‘‘COATS’’) 12 system costs of regulation. The Exchange has in
performing routine surveillances, in order to surveil a member’s activities place a regulatory structure to surveil,
investigations, examinations, financial across markets.13 conduct examinations and monitor the
monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, The Exchange believes that assessing marketplace for violations of Exchange
interpretive, and enforcement activities. the ORF to each Exchange member for Rules. The ORF assists the Exchange to
The Exchange will monitor the amount options transactions cleared by OCC in fund the cost of this regulation of the
of revenue collected from the ORF to the customer range where the execution marketplace.
ensure that it, in combination with its occurs on another exchange and is
other regulatory fees and fines, does not cleared by a ISE Member is an equitable Proposal 3—Semi-Annual Changes to
exceed the Exchange’s total regulatory allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and ORF
costs. The Exchange has designed the other charges among its members and The Exchange believes that the
ORF to generate revenues that, when issuers and other persons using its proposed rule change to remove the
combined with all of the Exchange’s facilities. The ORF is collected by OCC limit to amend the ORF only semi-
other regulatory fees, will be less than on behalf of ISE from Exchange clearing annually, with advance notice, is
or equal to the Exchange’s regulatory members for all customer transactions reasonable because the Exchange will
costs, which is consistent with the they clear or from non-Members for all continue to provide market participants
Commission’s view that regulatory fees customer transactions they clear that with thirty (30) days advance notice of
be used for regulatory purposes and not were executed on ISE. The Exchange amending the amount of the ORF. Also,
to support the Exchange’s business side. believes that this collection practice is the Exchange is required to monitor the
In this regard, the Exchange believes reasonable and appropriate because amount of revenue collected from the
that the proposed amount of the fee is higher fees are assessed to those ORF to ensure that it, in combination
reasonable. Members that require more Exchange with its other regulatory fees and fines,
regulatory services based on the amount do not exceed regulatory costs.
Proposal 2—Reflect the Manner in
of customer options business they Therefore, the Exchange believes it is
Which ISE Assesses and Collects Its
conduct. reasonable to remove the semi-annual
ORF
limit to amend its ORF in order to
The Exchange believes it is reasonable 12 COATS effectively enhances intermarket
permit the Exchange to make
and appropriate for the Exchange to options surveillance by enabling the options amendments to its ORF as necessary to
charge the ORF for options transactions exchanges to reconstruct the market promptly to
effectively surveil certain rules. comply with the Exchange’s obligations.
regardless of the exchange on which the 13 In addition to its own surveillance programs, This proposed change would conform
transactions occur. The Exchange has a the Exchange works with other SROs and exchanges this rule with that of NASDAQ PHLX
statutory obligation to enforce on intermarket surveillance related issues. Through LLC (‘‘Phlx’’), The NASDAQ Options
compliance by members and their its participation in the Intermarket Surveillance
Group (‘‘ISG’’), the Exchange shares information Market LLC (‘‘NOM’’) and NASDAQ BX,
associated persons under the Act and and coordinates inquiries and investigations with Inc. (‘‘BX’’).14
the rules of the Exchange and to surveil other exchanges designed to address potential The Exchange believes that the
for other manipulative conduct by intermarket manipulation and trading abuses. The proposed rule change to remove the
market participants (including non- Exchange’s participation in ISG helps it to satisfy
the requirement that it has coordinated surveillance limit to amend the ORF only semi-
members) trading on the Exchange. The with markets on which security futures are traded annually, with advance notice, is
Exchange cannot effectively surveil for and markets on which any security underlying equitable and not unfairly
such conduct without looking at and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

security futures are traded to detect manipulation
and insider trading. See Section 6(h)(3)(I) of the
discriminatory because it will apply in
evaluating activity across all options the same manner to all members that are
Act. ISG is an industry organization formed in 1983
markets. Many of the Exchange’s market to coordinate intermarket surveillance among the subject to the ORF. The Exchange has in
surveillance programs require the SROs by co-operatively sharing regulatory place a regulatory structure to surveil
Exchange to look at and evaluate information pursuant to a written agreement
between the parties. The goal of the ISG’s
for, conduct examinations and monitor
activity across all options markets, such information sharing is to coordinate regulatory
as surveillance for position limit efforts to address potential intermarket trading 14 See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule and NOM and BX

violations, manipulation, front-running abuses and manipulations. Rules at Chapter XV, Sections 5.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Aug 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM 14AUN1
37942 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 155 / Monday, August 14, 2017 / Notices

the marketplace for violations of Paper Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Exchange Rules. The ORF assists the COMMISSION
Exchange to fund the cost of this • Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange [Release No. 34–81338; File Nos. SR–DTC–
regulation of the marketplace. 2017–014; SR–FICC–2017–017; SR–NSCC–
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 2017–013]
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Statement on Burden on Competition
All submissions should refer to File No. Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
The Exchange does not believe that SR–ISE–2017–71. This file number Depository Trust Company; Fixed
the proposed rule change will impose should be included on the subject line Income Clearing Corporation; National
any burden on competition not Securities Clearing Corporation;
if email is used. To help the
necessary or appropriate in furtherance Notice of Filings of Proposed Rule
Commission process and review your
of the purposes of the Act. The ORF is Changes To Adopt the Clearing
not intended to have any impact on comments more efficiently, please use Agency Operational Risk Management
competition. Rather, it is designed to only one method. The Commission will Framework
enable the Exchange to recover a post all comments on the Commission’s
material portion of the Exchange’s cost Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ DATE: August 8, 2017.
related to its regulatory activities. The rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Exchange is obligated to ensure that the submission, all subsequent Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amount of regulatory revenue collected amendments, all written statements amended (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
from the ORF, in combination with its with respect to the proposed rule thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
other regulatory fees and fines, does not change that are filed with the on July 25, 2017, The Depository Trust
exceed regulatory costs. Commission, and all written Company (‘‘DTC’’), Fixed Income
communications relating to the Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’), and
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s National Securities Clearing Corporation
proposed rule change between the
Statement on Comments on the (‘‘NSCC,’’ and together with DTC and
Commission and any person, other than
Proposed Rule Change Received From FICC, the ‘‘Clearing Agencies’’) filed
Members, Participants, or Others those that may be withheld from the
with the Securities and Exchange
public in accordance with the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
No written comments were either provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be proposed rule changes as described in
solicited or received. available for Web site viewing and Items I and II below, which Items have
III. Date of Effectiveness of the printing in the Commission’s Public been prepared primarily by the Clearing
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Agencies. The Commission is
Commission Action Washington, DC 20549, on official publishing this notice to solicit
business days between the hours of comments on the proposed rule changes
The foregoing rule change has become 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the from interested persons.
effective pursuant to Section
filing also will be available for
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.15 At any time I. Clearing Agencies’ Statement of the
inspection and copying at the principal Terms of Substance of the Proposed
within 60 days of the filing of the
office of the Exchange. All comments Rule Changes
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal The proposed rule changes would
such rule change if it appears to the adopt the Clearing Agency Operational
Commission that such action is: (i) identifying information from
Risk Management Framework
necessary or appropriate in the public submissions. You should submit only
(‘‘Framework’’) of the Clearing
interest; (ii) for the protection of information that you wish to make
Agencies, described below. The
investors; or (iii) otherwise in available publicly. All submissions Framework would apply to both of
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. should refer to File No. SR–ISE–2017– FICC’s divisions, the Government
If the Commission takes such action, the 71, and should be submitted on or Securities Division (‘‘GSD’’) and the
Commission shall institute proceedings before September 5, 2017. Mortgage-Backed Securities Division
to determine whether the proposed rule For the Commission, by the Division of (‘‘MBSD’’). The Framework would be
should be approved or disapproved. Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated maintained by the Clearing Agencies to
IV. Solicitation of Comments authority.16 support their compliance with Rule
Eduardo A. Aleman, 17Ad–22(e)(17) under the Act, as
Interested persons are invited to described below.3
Assistant Secretary.
submit written data, views, and Although the Clearing Agencies
arguments concerning the foregoing, [FR Doc. 2017–17050 Filed 8–11–17; 8:45 am] would consider the Framework to be a
including whether the proposed rule BILLING CODE 8011–01–P rule, the proposed rule changes do not
change is consistent with the Act. require any changes to the Rules, By-
Comments may be submitted by any of laws and Organization Certificate of
the following methods: DTC (‘‘DTC Rules’’), the Rulebook of
GSD (‘‘GSD Rules’’), the Clearing Rules
Electronic Comments
of MBSD (‘‘MBSD Rules’’), or the Rules
• Use the Commission’s Internet & Procedures of NSCC (‘‘NSCC Rules’’),
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ as the Framework would be a
rules/sro.shtml); or standalone document.4
• Send an email to rule-comments@
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–ISE– 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2017–71 on the subject line. 3 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(17).
4 Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined
15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). in the DTC Rules, GSD Rules, MBSD Rules, or

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Aug 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM 14AUN1
Document Created: 2018-10-24 11:51:45
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 11:51:45
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		82 FR 37939