82_FR_39832 82 FR 39671 - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method

82 FR 39671 - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 161 (August 22, 2017)

Page Range39671-39673
FR Document2017-17624

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a direct final rule in the Federal Register on June 23, 2017 titled National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method. This final rule removes the provisions that were added in the June 23, 2017, direct final rule and restores the provisions that were deleted in that rule.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39671-39673]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0442; FRL-9966-64-OAR]
RIN 2060-AT57


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the 
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a 
direct final rule in the Federal Register on June 23, 2017 titled 
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) From 
the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring 
Method. This final rule removes the provisions that were added in the 
June 23, 2017, direct final rule and restores the provisions that were 
deleted in that rule.

DATES: Effective August 22, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and 
Programs Division (D243-04), Office of Air Quality Planning and 
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle 
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-1103; fax 
number: (919) 541-5450; and email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Why is EPA taking this action?

    On June 23, 2017, the EPA published a direct final rule to amend 
the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the 
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (Portland Cement NESHAP) to 
allow an alternative monitoring method to be used to comply with 
hydrogen chloride (HCl) emissions standards (82 FR 28562). We stated in 
that direct final

[[Page 39672]]

rule that if we received adverse comment by July 3, 2017, the direct 
final rule would not take effect and we would publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register. At the same time, we published a 
parallel proposal, which proposed to make the same changes that were 
made in the direct final rulemaking (82 FR 28616). We subsequently 
received adverse comment on the direct final rule and the parallel 
proposal, but were unable to withdraw the direct final rule in a timely 
manner. In this document, we are taking final action to remove the 
provisions that were added to the Portland Cement NESHAP in the direct 
final rule and restoring the provisions that were deleted in that rule. 
This action will, thus, undo the changes made by the direct final rule. 
We are concurrently publishing a rule re-proposing and providing 
additional opportunity for public comment on the same amendment for the 
Portland Cement NESHAP that was proposed on June 23, 2017.
    Although the EPA did provide an opportunity for public comment on 
the parallel proposal, the EPA also finds that there is ``good cause'' 
under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)) to 
make the amendments discussed in this final rule without prior notice 
and comment. For this rule, notice and comment is unnecessary because 
it simply implements an action that the EPA indicated it would take if 
it received adverse comment on the direct final rule. The record for 
the provisions being restored is the same record that supported those 
provisions in the first instance and that was previously subject to 
notice and comment. These actions are effective as of August 22, 2017.

II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was, 
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden 
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection 
activities contained in the existing regulation (40 CFR part 63, 
subpart LLL) and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0416. This action 
does not change the information collection requirements.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This action is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to 
rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the 
APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. The rule is not subject to 
notice and comment requirements because the agency has invoked the APA 
``good cause'' exemption under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, 
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175. It will neither impose substantial direct 
compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor 
preempt tribal law. The EPA is aware of one tribally owned Portland 
cement facility currently subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL that 
will be subject to this final rule. However, the provisions of this 
final rule are not expected to impose new or substantial direct 
compliance costs on tribal governments since the provisions in this 
direct final rule are extending the use of an alternative to the HCl 
monitoring provisions, including an option which provides operational 
flexibility. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those 
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks 
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect 
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in 
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental 
health risk or safety risk.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately 
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority 
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as 
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 
This action does not affect the level of protection provided to human 
health or the environment.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule 
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of 
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures, 
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental 
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental 
Protection Agency is amending title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations (CFR) as follows:

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

[[Page 39673]]

Subpart LLL--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry

0
2. Section 63.1349 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(6)(v)(H) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  63.1349  Performance testing requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (v) * * *
    (H) Paragraph (b)(6)(v) of this section expires on July 25, 2017 at 
which time the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with 
paragraphs (b)(6)(i), (ii), or (iii).
* * * * *

0
3. Section 63.1350 is amended by revising paragraph (l)(4) introductory 
text to read as follows:


Sec.  63.1350  Monitoring requirements.

* * * * *
    (l) * * *
    (4) If you monitor continuous performance through the use of an HCl 
CPMS according to paragraphs (b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of Sec.  63.1349, 
for any exceedance of the 30 kiln operating day HCl CPMS average value 
from the established operating limit, you must:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-17624 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                              39671

                                              operations and protect infrastructure                   2006. The SIP submission included                     Particulate matter, Reporting and
                                              and property without COTP permission.                   changes to existing minor source                      recordkeeping requirements.
                                                (e) Enforcement. The Coast Guard                      permitting exemptions and a definition                  Dated: August 10, 2017.
                                              vessels enforcing this section can be                   related to minor source permitting                    V. Anne Heard,
                                              contacted on marine band radio VHF–                     exemptions. On June 29, 2017 (82 FR
                                                                                                                                                            Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
                                              FM channel 16 (156.8 MHZ). The                          29469), EPA also published an
                                              cognizant COTP and his or her                           accompanying rulemaking proposing to                  ■ Accordingly, the amendments to 40
                                              designated representatives can be                       approve the portions of the                           CFR 52.570(c) published on June 29,
                                              contacted at telephone number listed in                 aforementioned SIP revision in the                    2017 (82 FR 29418), which were to
                                              paragraph (d)(2) of this section.                       event that EPA received adverse                       become effective August 28, 2017, are
                                                Dated: August 2, 2017.                                comments on the direct final                          withdrawn.
                                              Meredith L. Austin,                                     rulemaking.                                           [FR Doc. 2017–17617 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]

                                              Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,                 In the direct final rulemaking, EPA                BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

                                              Fifth Coast Guard District.                             explained that the Agency was
                                              [FR Doc. 2017–17748 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]             publishing the rule without prior
                                                                                                      proposal because the Agency viewed the                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                              BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
                                                                                                      submittal as a non-controversial SIP                  AGENCY
                                                                                                      amendment and anticipated no adverse
                                                                                                      comments. Further, EPA explained that                 40 CFR Part 63
                                              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                                                                      the Agency was publishing a separate                  [EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0442; FRL–9966–64–
                                              AGENCY
                                                                                                      document in the proposed rules section                OAR]
                                              40 CFR Part 52                                          of the Federal Register to serve as the               RIN 2060–AT57
                                                                                                      proposal to approve the SIP revision
                                              [EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0113; FRL–9966–66–                    should an adverse comment be filed.                   National Emission Standards for
                                              Region 4]                                               EPA also noted that the rule would be                 Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
                                                                                                      effective on August 28, 2017, without                 Portland Cement Manufacturing
                                              Air Plan Approval; Georgia: Permit
                                                                                                      further notice unless the Agency                      Industry: Alternative Monitoring
                                              Exemptions and Definitions;
                                                                                                      received adverse comment by July 31,                  Method
                                              Withdrawal
                                                                                                      2017. EPA explained that if the Agency
                                              AGENCY: Environmental Protection                        received such comments, then EPA                      AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                              Agency (EPA).                                           would publish a document withdrawing                  Agency (EPA).
                                              ACTION: Direct final rule: withdrawal.                  the final rule and informing the public               ACTION: Final rule.
                                                                                                      that the rule would not take effect. It
                                              SUMMARY:    Due to adverse comments                     was also explained that all public                    SUMMARY:    The U.S. Environmental
                                              received, the Environmental Protection                  comments received would then be                       Protection Agency (EPA) published a
                                              Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the June                    addressed in a subsequent final rule                  direct final rule in the Federal Register
                                              29, 2017, direct final rule that would                  based on the proposed rule, and that                  on June 23, 2017 titled National
                                              have approved a revision to the Georgia                 EPA would not institute a second                      Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
                                              State Implementation Plan (SIP)                         comment period on this action. The                    Pollutants (NESHAP) From the Portland
                                              concerning changes to existing minor                    public was advised that if no comments                Cement Manufacturing Industry:
                                              source permitting exemptions and a                      were received that the rule would be                  Alternative Monitoring Method. This
                                              definition related to minor source                      effective on August 28, 2017, with no                 final rule removes the provisions that
                                              permitting exemptions. EPA stated in                    further actions on the proposed rule.                 were added in the June 23, 2017, direct
                                              the direct final rule that if EPA received                 On July 31, 2017, EPA received one                 final rule and restores the provisions
                                              adverse comments by July 31, 2017, the                  set of adverse comments from a single                 that were deleted in that rule.
                                              rule would be withdrawn and not take                    Commenter representing four individual                DATES: Effective August 22, 2017.
                                              effect.                                                 groups. As a result of the comments                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
                                              DATES: The direct final rule published at               received, EPA is withdrawing the direct               Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
                                              82 FR 29418 on June 29, 2017, is                        final rule approving changes to existing              Programs Division (D243–04), Office of
                                              withdrawn, effective August 22, 2017.                   minor source permitting exemptions                    Air Quality Planning and Standards,
                                              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.                     and a definition related to minor source              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
                                              Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management                   permitting exemptions into the Georgia                Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
                                              Section, Air Planning and                               SIP. If EPA determines that it is                     27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
                                              Implementation Branch, U.S.                             appropriate to finalize the proposed                  1103; fax number: (919) 541–5450; and
                                              Environmental Protection Agency                         approval of these changes to the Georgia              email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.
                                              Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,                        SIP, EPA will publish a final rule which              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                              Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Phone                      will include a response to the comments
                                              number: (404) 562–9089; Email:                          received. In the event that EPA                       I. Why is EPA taking this action?
                                              akers.brad@epa.gov.                                     determines that it is not appropriate to                 On June 23, 2017, the EPA published
                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June                      finalize the proposed approval related to             a direct final rule to amend the National
                                              29, 2017 (82 FR 29418), EPA published                   these changes, EPA may issue a                        Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              a direct final rulemaking to approve                    subsequent proposal with a different                  Pollutants From the Portland Cement
                                              portions of a SIP revision submitted by                 course of action.                                     Manufacturing Industry (Portland
                                              the State of Georgia, through the Georgia                                                                     Cement NESHAP) to allow an
                                                                                                      List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                              Department of Natural Resources’                                                                              alternative monitoring method to be
                                              Environmental Protection Division (GA                     Environmental protection, Air                       used to comply with hydrogen chloride
                                              EPD), on September 19, 2006, with a                     pollution control, Incorporation by                   (HCl) emissions standards (82 FR
                                              clarification submitted on November 6,                  reference, Intergovernmental relations,               28562). We stated in that direct final


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:39 Aug 21, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM   22AUR1


                                              39672             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                              rule that if we received adverse                        CFR part 63, subpart LLL) and has                     the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
                                              comment by July 3, 2017, the direct                     assigned OMB control number 2060–                     action’’ in section 2–202 of the
                                              final rule would not take effect and we                 0416. This action does not change the                 Executive Order. This action is not
                                              would publish a timely withdrawal in                    information collection requirements.                  subject to Executive Order 13045
                                              the Federal Register. At the same time,                                                                       because it does not concern an
                                                                                                      C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
                                              we published a parallel proposal, which                                                                       environmental health risk or safety risk.
                                              proposed to make the same changes that                    This action is not subject to the RFA.
                                              were made in the direct final                           The RFA applies only to rules subject to              H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
                                              rulemaking (82 FR 28616). We                            notice and comment rulemaking                         Concerning Regulations That
                                              subsequently received adverse comment                   requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C.                  Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
                                              on the direct final rule and the parallel               553, or any other statute. The rule is not            Distribution, or Use
                                              proposal, but were unable to withdraw                   subject to notice and comment                           This action is not subject to Executive
                                              the direct final rule in a timely manner.               requirements because the agency has                   Order 13211 because it is not a
                                              In this document, we are taking final                   invoked the APA ‘‘good cause’’                        significant regulatory action under
                                              action to remove the provisions that                    exemption under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).                      Executive Order 12866.
                                              were added to the Portland Cement
                                                                                                      D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                       I. National Technology Transfer and
                                              NESHAP in the direct final rule and
                                                                                                      (UMRA)                                                Advancement Act (NTTAA)
                                              restoring the provisions that were
                                              deleted in that rule. This action will,                    This action does not contain an                      This rulemaking does not involve
                                              thus, undo the changes made by the                      unfunded mandate as described in                      technical standards.
                                              direct final rule. We are concurrently                  UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
                                                                                                      not significantly or uniquely affect small            J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
                                              publishing a rule re-proposing and                                                                            Actions To Address Environmental
                                              providing additional opportunity for                    governments. The action imposes no
                                                                                                      enforceable duty on any state, local, or              Justice in Minority Populations and
                                              public comment on the same                                                                                    Low-Income Populations
                                              amendment for the Portland Cement                       tribal governments or the private sector.
                                              NESHAP that was proposed on June 23,                                                                             The EPA believes that this action does
                                                                                                      E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
                                              2017.                                                                                                         not have disproportionately high and
                                                 Although the EPA did provide an                        This action does not have federalism                adverse human health or environmental
                                              opportunity for public comment on the                   implications. It will not have substantial            effects on minority populations, low-
                                              parallel proposal, the EPA also finds                   direct effects on the states, on the                  income populations, and/or indigenous
                                              that there is ‘‘good cause’’ under the                  relationship between the national                     peoples, as specified in Executive Order
                                              Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5                   government and the states, or on the                  12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
                                              U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)) to make the                        distribution of power and                             This action does not affect the level of
                                              amendments discussed in this final rule                 responsibilities among the various                    protection provided to human health or
                                              without prior notice and comment. For                   levels of government.                                 the environment.
                                              this rule, notice and comment is                        F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation                K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
                                              unnecessary because it simply                           and Coordination With Indian Tribal
                                              implements an action that the EPA                                                                               This action is subject to the CRA, and
                                                                                                      Governments
                                              indicated it would take if it received                                                                        the EPA will submit a rule report to
                                              adverse comment on the direct final                       This action does not have tribal                    each House of the Congress and to the
                                              rule. The record for the provisions being               implications, as specified in Executive               Comptroller General of the United
                                              restored is the same record that                        Order 13175. It will neither impose                   States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
                                              supported those provisions in the first                 substantial direct compliance costs on                as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
                                              instance and that was previously subject                federally recognized tribal governments,
                                                                                                      nor preempt tribal law. The EPA is                    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
                                              to notice and comment. These actions
                                              are effective as of August 22, 2017.                    aware of one tribally owned Portland                    Environmental protection,
                                                                                                      cement facility currently subject to 40               Administrative practice and procedures,
                                              II. Statutory and Executive Order                       CFR part 63, subpart LLL that will be                 Air pollution control, Hazardous
                                              Reviews                                                 subject to this final rule. However, the              substances, Intergovernmental relations,
                                                 Additional information about these                   provisions of this final rule are not                 Reporting and recordkeeping
                                              statutes and Executive Orders can be                    expected to impose new or substantial                 requirements.
                                              found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-                      direct compliance costs on tribal                       Dated: August 11, 2017.
                                              regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.                  governments since the provisions in this
                                                                                                                                                            E. Scott Pruitt,
                                                                                                      direct final rule are extending the use of
                                              A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory                                                                          Administrator.
                                                                                                      an alternative to the HCl monitoring
                                              Planning and Review and Executive                       provisions, including an option which                   For the reasons stated in the
                                              Order 13563: Improving Regulation and                   provides operational flexibility. Thus,               preamble, the Environmental Protection
                                              Regulatory Review                                       Executive Order 13175 does not apply                  Agency is amending title 40, chapter I,
                                                This action is not a significant                      to this action.                                       part 63 of the Code of Federal
                                              regulatory action and was, therefore, not                                                                     Regulations (CFR) as follows:
                                                                                                      G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
                                              submitted to the Office of Management
                                                                                                      Children From Environmental Health                    PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
                                              and Budget (OMB) for review.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                                                                                      Risks and Safety Risks                                STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
                                              B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)                          The EPA interprets Executive Order                  POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
                                                This action does not impose any new                   13045 as applying to those regulatory                 CATEGORIES
                                              information collection burden under the                 actions that concern environmental
                                              PRA. OMB has previously approved the                    health or safety risks that the EPA has               ■ 1. The authority citation for part 63
                                              information collection activities                       reason to believe may                                 continues to read as follows:
                                              contained in the existing regulation (40                disproportionately affect children, per                   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:39 Aug 21, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00018   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM   22AUR1


                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                        39673

                                              Subpart LLL—National Emission                           DATES:  Effective September 21, 2017.                 that should be considered allowable
                                              Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants                  The compliance date for 47 CFR                        costs for VRS compensation. Various
                                              From the Portland Cement                                64.621(b)(1) is December 20, 2017. The                parties commenting in this proceeding
                                              Manufacturing Industry                                  incorporation by reference of certain                 nonetheless urge that the Commission
                                                                                                      publication listed in the rules was                   re-open the matter of allowing costs
                                              ■ 2. Section 63.1349 is amended by                      approved by the Director of the Federal               associated with customer premise
                                              adding paragraph (b)(6)(v)(H) to read as                Register as of May 30, 2017.                          equipment (CPE), numbering, outreach,
                                              follows:                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob                  and research and development (R&D). In
                                                                                                      Aldrich, Consumer and Governmental                    addition, Sorenson Communications,
                                              § 63.1349 Performance testing
                                                                                                      Affairs Bureau at: (202) 418–0996, email              LLC (Sorenson) raises new concerns
                                              requirements.
                                                                                                      Robert.Aldrich@fcc.gov, or Eliot                      about allowing compensation for
                                              *      *        * *    *                                                                                      imputed intellectual property. These
                                                                                                      Greenwald, Consumer and
                                                 (b) * * *                                                                                                  issues are beyond the scope of the
                                                                                                      Governmental Affairs Bureau at: (202)
                                                 (6) * * *                                                                                                  rulemaking. The Commission has
                                                                                                      418–2235, email Eliot.Greenwald@
                                                 (v) * * *                                                                                                  previously considered and disallowed
                                                 (H) Paragraph (b)(6)(v) of this section              fcc.gov.
                                                                                                                                                            compensation for each of these
                                              expires on July 25, 2017 at which time                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
                                                                                                                                                            categories, except intellectual property,
                                              the owner or operator must demonstrate                  summary of the Commission’s Report
                                                                                                                                                            which is addressed below.
                                              compliance with paragraphs (b)(6)(i),                   and Order and Order, FCC 17–86,                          2. No reason to reopen previously
                                              (ii), or (iii).                                         adopted and released on July 6, 2017, in              settled disallowance issues. No party
                                              *      *        * *    *                                CG Docket Nos. 10–51 and 03–123. The                  provides a compelling reason to reopen
                                                                                                      full text of this document will be                    the above issues in this proceeding,
                                              ■ 3. Section 63.1350 is amended by
                                                                                                      available for public inspection and                   especially in the absence of
                                              revising paragraph (l)(4) introductory
                                                                                                      copying via the Commission’s                          Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
                                              text to read as follows:
                                                                                                      Electronic Comment Filing System                      notice. The Commission does not agree
                                              § 63.1350   Monitoring requirements.                    (ECFS), and during regular business                   that circumstances have changed
                                              *     *     *     *    *                                hours at the FCC Reference Information                dramatically and sees no material
                                                (l) * * *                                             Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW.,              difference from prior proceedings where
                                                (4) If you monitor continuous                         Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.                   these issues were addressed.
                                              performance through the use of an HCl                   To request materials in accessible                       3. Even if the issues were not already
                                              CPMS according to paragraphs                            formats for people with disabilities                  settled and there was APA notice
                                              (b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of § 63.1349, for              (Braille, large print, electronic files,              regarding them, the Commission would
                                              any exceedance of the 30 kiln operating                 audio format), send an email to fcc504@               not be persuaded by arguments to
                                              day HCl CPMS average value from the                     fcc.gov or call the Consumer and                      expand allowable costs. Equalizing all
                                              established operating limit, you must:                  Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)                  VRS-related costs to a voice telephone
                                              *     *     *     *    *                                418–0530 (voice), (844) 432–2272                      user’s costs is not part of the
                                              [FR Doc. 2017–17624 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]             (videophone), or (202) 418–0432 (TTY).                Commission’s mandate under section
                                              BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                  Congressional Review Act                              225 of the Act. Congressional intent to
                                                                                                                                                            equalize either network access rates or
                                                                                                        The Commission sent a copy of                       equipment costs for TRS and voice
                                                                                                      document FCC 17–86 to Congress and                    service users is not evident in the text
                                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS                                  the Government Accountability Office
                                              COMMISSION                                                                                                    of this narrowly drawn provision, its
                                                                                                      pursuant to the Congressional Review                  surrounding context, or its legislative
                                                                                                      Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).                       history. In 1990, the year of section
                                              47 CFR Part 64
                                                                                                      Final Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                 225’s enactment, all TRS calls took
                                              [CG Docket Nos. 10–51 and 03–123; FCC                                                                         place between individuals who used
                                              17–86]                                                  Analysis
                                                                                                                                                            TTYs and voice users. But the high costs
                                                                                                        Document FCC 17–86 does not
                                              Structure and Practices of the Video                                                                          of TTY service rates and equipment
                                                                                                      contain any new or modified
                                              Relay Services Program                                                                                        were matters of public awareness and
                                                                                                      information collection requirements                   were being addressed through state and
                                              AGENCY:  Federal Communications                         subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act                federal action outside the relay
                                              Commission.                                             of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13. In addition,                 requirements of section 225 of the Act.
                                                                                                      therefore, it does not contain any new                Regarding service costs, the plain text of
                                              ACTION: Final rule.
                                                                                                      or modified information collection                    this section demonstrates that it solely
                                              SUMMARY:   In this document, the                        burden for small business concerns with               was intended to prevent relay users
                                              Commission adopts a four-year rate plan                 fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to                  from incurring the added costs of
                                              to compensate video relay service (VRS)                 the Small Business Paperwork Relief                   routing TRS calls through remote relay
                                              providers, amends its rules to permit-                  Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107–198, see 44                  centers that lie outside the geographical
                                              server based routing for VRS and point-                 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).                                    locations of the parties to a relay call,
                                              to-point calls, authorizes the continued                Synopsis                                              and nothing more. Congress had
                                              use of money from the                                                                                         knowledge about, and ample
                                              Telecommunications Relay Service                        VRS Compensation—Allowable Cost                       opportunity to direct the Commission to
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              (TRS) Fund for Commission-supervised                    Categories                                            equalize telephone service costs for TTY
                                              research and development, eliminates                      1. In the Further Notice of Proposed                users at the time of section 225’s
                                              rules providing for a neutral video                     Rulemaking (FNPRM), FCC 17–26,                        enactment, yet it specifically chose not
                                              communications service platform, and                    published at 82 FR 17613, April 12,                   to do so. Accordingly, the discrepancy
                                              reinstates the effectiveness of the rule                2017, the Commission stated its                       between the higher service costs for a
                                              incorporating the VRS Interoperability                  intention not to reopen questions                     broadband connection needed to
                                              Profile technical standard.                             concerning the categories of expenses                 achieve access to VRS and the costs of


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:39 Aug 21, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00019   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM   22AUR1



Document Created: 2018-10-24 11:55:28
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 11:55:28
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesEffective August 22, 2017.
ContactMr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243-04), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-1103; fax
FR Citation82 FR 39671 
RIN Number2060-AT57
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedures; Air Pollution Control; Hazardous Substances; Intergovernmental Relations and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR