82 FR 40070 - Safety Zone; Village of Sodus Point Fireworks; Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 163 (August 24, 2017)

Page Range		40070-40072
FR Document		2017-17933

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from portions of Lake Ontario during the Village of Sodus Point Fireworks display on September 2, 2017. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40070-40072]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0718]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Village of Sodus Point Fireworks; Lake Ontario, 
Sodus Point, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on 
Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict 
vessels from portions of Lake Ontario during the Village of Sodus Point 
Fireworks display on September 2, 2017. This temporary safety zone is 
necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards 
associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into 
this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain 
of the Port Buffalo.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9:45 p.m. to 11 p.m. on September 2, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0718 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of 
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9322, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule. The event sponsor did not submit notice to 
the Coast Guard with sufficient time remaining before the event to 
publish an NPRM. Delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a 
comment period to run would be impracticable and contrary to the public 
interest by inhibiting the Coast Guard's ability to protect spectators 
and vessels from the hazards associated with a fireworks display.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register because doing so would be 
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Delaying the 
effective date would be contrary to the rule's objectives of ensuring 
safety of life on the navigable waters and protection of persons and 
vessels in the vicinity of the fireworks display.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined that a 
fireworks display presents significant risks to public safety and 
property. Such hazards include premature and accidental detonations, 
dangerous projectiles, and falling or burning debris. This rule is 
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the 
navigable waters within the safety zone while the fireworks display 
takes place.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone on September 2, 2017 from 9:45 
p.m. to 11:00 p.m. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake 
Ontario; Sodus Point, NY contained within 560-foot radius of: 
43[deg]16'33'' N., 076[deg]58'27'' W. (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to 
reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for 
every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be 
identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be 
prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory 
action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is 
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's 
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the 
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced only during the fireworks display. Also, 
the safety zone is designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. 
Furthermore, the safety zone has been designed to allow vessels to 
transit around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within the 
particular areas are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, 
moreover, vessels

[[Page 40071]]

may still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain 
of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that it 
is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule establishes a temporary safety zone. It is categorically excluded 
under section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction, 
which pertains to establishment of safety zones. A Record of 
Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting this determination is 
available in the docket where indicated in the ADDRESSES section of 
this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0718 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0718   Safety Zone; Village of Sodus Point Fireworks; 
Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, NY.

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake 
Ontario; Sodus Point, NY contained within a 560-foot radius of: 
43[deg]16'33'' N., 076[deg]58'27'' W. (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced on 
September 2, 2017 from 9:45 p.m. until 11:00 p.m.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all

[[Page 40072]]

directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Buffalo, or his on-
scene representative.

    Dated: August 17, 2017.
Joseph S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2017-17933 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 40071

may still transit through the safety zone effect on the States, on the relationship Protesters are asked to contact the
when permitted by the Captain of the between the national government and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
Port. the States, or on the distribution of INFORMATION CONTACT section to
power and responsibilities among the coordinate protest activities so that your
B. Impact on Small Entities
various levels of government. We have message can be received without
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this rule under that Order and jeopardizing the safety or security of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, have determined that it is consistent people, places or vessels.
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism
the potential impact of regulations on principles and preemption requirements List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
small entities during rulemaking. The described in Executive Order 13132. Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under Executive Order requirements, Security measures,
that are independently owned and 13175, Consultation and Coordination Waterways.
operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal Governments, For the reasons discussed in the
fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian CFR part 165 as follows:
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the
605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes, PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal
While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for continues to read as follows:
zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section Department of Homeland Security Delegation
economic impact on any vessel owner above. No. 0170.1.
or operator. ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0718 to read as
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
follows:
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires § 165.T09–0718 Safety Zone; Village of
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of Sodus Point Fireworks; Lake Ontario,
Sodus Point, NY.
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions (a) Location. The safety zone will
organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a encompass all waters of Lake Ontario;
jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the Sodus Point, NY contained within a
concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of 560-foot radius of: 43°16′33″ N.,
compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 076°58′27″ W. (NAD 83).
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule (b) Enforcement period. This
CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure, regulation will be enforced on
Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule September 2, 2017 from 9:45 p.m. until
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble. 11:00 p.m.
who enforce, or otherwise determine (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
F. Environment the general regulations in § 165.23 of
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under this part, entry into, transiting, or
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security anchoring within this safety zone is
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and prohibited unless authorized by the
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in designated on-scene representative.
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National (2) This safety zone is closed to all
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 vessel traffic, except as may be
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have permitted by the Captain of the Port
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that it is one of a category Buffalo or his designated on-scene
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The of actions that do not individually or representative.
Coast Guard will not retaliate against cumulatively have a significant effect on (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
small entities that question or complain the human environment. This rule the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
about this rule or any policy or action establishes a temporary safety zone. It is Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
of the Coast Guard. categorically excluded under section petty officer who has been designated
2.B.2, figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g) of the by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
C. Collection of Information Instruction, which pertains to on his behalf.
This rule will not call for a new establishment of safety zones. A Record (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
collection of information under the of Environmental Consideration (REC) or operate within the safety zone must
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 supporting this determination is contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with RULES

U.S.C. 3501–3520). available in the docket where indicated or his on-scene representative to obtain
in the ADDRESSES section of this permission to do so. The Captain of the
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Port Buffalo or his on-scene
preamble.
Governments representative may be contacted via
A rule has implications for federalism G. Protest Activities VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
under Executive Order 13132, The Coast Guard respects the First permission to enter or operate in the
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Amendment rights of protesters. safety zone must comply with all

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:25 Aug 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM 24AUR1

40072 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

directions given to them by the Captain should include discussion of all points In this document, EPA is taking direct
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene you wish to make. EPA will generally final action to approve the portions of
representative. not consider comments or comment this submittal that make changes to
Dated: August 17, 2017. contents located outside of the primary ADEM Administrative Code Rule 335–
Joseph S. Dufresne,
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 3–14–.04—‘‘Air Permits Authorizing
other file sharing system). For Construction in Clean Air Areas
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
additional submission methods, the full [Prevention of Significant Deterioration
EPA public comment policy, Permitting (PSD)].’’ Alabama’s May 7,
[FR Doc. 2017–17933 Filed 8–23–17; 8:45 am]
information about CBI or multimedia 2012, SIP submittal changes the PSD
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
submissions, and general guidance on regulations at Rule 335–3–14–.04 by
making effective comments, please visit adding a definition of ‘‘replacement
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ unit’’ and by modifying the definition of
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION commenting-epa-dockets. ‘‘emissions unit’’ to expressly include
AGENCY replacement units as existing emissions
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andres Febres of the Air Regulatory units. As revised in the May 5, 2017,
40 CFR Part 52
Management Section, Air Planning and withdrawal letter discussed in Section
[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0371; FRL–9966–47– Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides III, below, these changes are similar to
Region 4] those made to the Federal PSD
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, regulations at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(7) and
Air Plan Approval; Alabama: PSD (33) in the rule titled ‘‘Prevention of
Replacement Units Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Significant Deterioration (PSD) and
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Febres can be reached by telephone at Non-Attainment New Source Review
Agency (EPA). (404) 562–8966 or via electronic mail at (NSR): Reconsideration’’ See 68 FR
ACTION: Direct final rule. febres-martinez.andres@epa.gov. 63021 (November 7, 2003) (hereinafter
referred to as the NSR Reform
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Reconsideration Rule).
Agency (EPA) is approving a portion of I. What action is the Agency taking? EPA is not taking action on the
Alabama’s State Implementation Plan portions of Alabama’s May 7, 2012,
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of On May 7, 2012, ADEM submitted a submittal regarding ADEM
Alabama, through the Alabama SIP revision for EPA’s approval that Administrative Code Chapter 335–3–
Department of Environmental includes, among other things, changes 10—‘‘Standards of Performance for New
Management (ADEM), on May 7, 2012. to Alabama’s PSD permitting regulations Stationary Sources,’’ and Chapter 335–
The portion of the revision that EPA is as part of the State’s New Source 3–11—‘‘National Emission Standards for
approving relates to the State’s Review (NSR) permitting program.1 The Hazardous Air Pollutants.’’ In the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration NSR program, established in parts C and submittal, Alabama acknowledges that
(PSD) permitting regulations. In D of title I of the CAA and EPA’s these regulations are not part of
particular, the revision adds a definition implementing regulations at 40 CFR Alabama’s SIP and states that the
of ‘‘replacement unit’’ and provides that 51.165, 40 CFR 51.166, and 40 CFR ‘‘revisions to these [regulations] are not
a replacement unit is a type of existing 52.21, is a preconstruction review and proposed to be incorporated into
emissions unit under the definition of permitting program applicable to new Alabama’s SIP.’’
‘‘emissions unit.’’ This action is being major stationary sources of regulated
NSR pollutants and major modifications II. Background
taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act). at existing major stationary sources. A A. NSR Reform
major modification is defined as any
DATES: This direct final rule is effective On December 31, 2002, EPA
physical change in or change in the
October 23, 2017 without further notice, method of operation of a major published final rule revisions to the
unless EPA receives adverse comment stationary source that would result in a CAA’s PSD and Nonattainment New
by September 25, 2017. If EPA receives significant emissions increase of a Source Review (NNSR) programs. See
such comments, it will publish a timely regulated NSR pollutant and a 67 FR 80186 (hereinafter referred to as
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the significant net emissions increase of that the 2002 NSR Rule). The revisions
Federal Register and inform the public pollutant from the major stationary included several major changes to the
that the rule will not take effect. source. See 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1), NSR program, including the addition of
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 51.166(b)(2)(i), and 52.21(b)(2)(i). an actual-to-projected-actual emissions
identified by Docket ID No EPA–R04– test for determining NSR applicability
OAR–2017–0371 at http:// 1 EPA’s regulations governing the implementation for existing emissions units.
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online of NSR permitting programs are contained in 40 Following publication, EPA received
instructions for submitting comments. CFR 51.160—51.166; 52.21, 52.24; and part 51, numerous petitions requesting
Once submitted, comments cannot be appendix S. The CAA NSR program is composed reconsideration of several aspects of the
of three separate programs: PSD, NNSR, and Minor
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. NSR. PSD is established in part C of title I of the
final rule. On July 30, 2003 (68 FR
EPA may publish any comment received CAA and applies in areas that meet the NAAQS— 44624), EPA granted reconsideration on
to its public docket. Do not submit ‘‘attainment areas’’—as well as areas where there is six issues, including whether
electronically any information you insufficient information to determine if the area replacement units should be allowed to
meets the NAAQS—‘‘unclassifiable areas.’’ The
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with RULES

consider to be Confidential Business NNSR program is established in part D of title I of
use the actual-to-projected-actual
Information (CBI) or other information the CAA and applies in areas that are not in applicability test to determine whether
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. attainment of the NAAQS—‘‘nonattainment areas.’’ installing a replacement unit results in
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, The Minor NSR program addresses construction or a significant emissions increase. On
modification activities that do not qualify as
etc.) must be accompanied by a written ‘‘major’’ and applies regardless of the designation
November 7, 2003, EPA published the
comment. The written comment is of the area in which a source is located. Together, NSR Reform Reconsideration Rule. See
considered the official comment and these programs are referred to as the NSR programs. 68 FR 63021. In the reconsideration

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:25 Aug 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM 24AUR1

Document Created: 2018-10-24 12:37:51
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 12:37:51

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 9:45 p.m. to 11 p.m. on September 2, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716- 843-9322, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 40070
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 40070 - Safety Zone; Village of Sodus Point Fireworks; Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 163 (August 24, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard