82 FR 42289 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 172 (September 7, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 172 (September 7, 2017)
| Page Range | 42289-42291 | |
| FR Document | 2017-18998 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 42289-42291] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-18998] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review is August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016. The review covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily determine that Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung) and Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), the two companies selected for individual examination, sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value during the period of review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable September 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moses Song or John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5041 or (202) 482-0195, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department initiated this review on October 14, 2016.\1\ We selected two mandatory respondents in this review, [[Page 42290]] Hyosung and Hyundai. For a more detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 71061 (October 14, 2016) (Initiation Notice); see also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 78778, 78781 (November 9, 2016) (Amended Initiation Notice). We issued an amended Federal Register initiation notice on November 9, 2016, to reflect one company name that was missing from the October 14, 2016 Initiation Notice. \2\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from James Maeder, Senior Director, performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2015-2016'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The full text of the scope of the order is contained in Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Facts Available Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, the Department is preliminarily relying upon facts otherwise available to assign an estimated weighted-average dumping margin to the mandatory respondents in this review because both respondents withheld necessary information that was requested by the Department, thereby significantly impeding the conduct of the review. Further, the Department preliminarily determines that these mandatory respondents failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of their abilities to comply with requests for information and, thus, the Department is applying adverse facts available (AFA) to the respondents, in accordance with section 776(b) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions regarding the application of AFA, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rate for Non-Selected Companies In accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United States,\4\ we are applying to the non-selected companies the rate preliminarily applied to Hyosung and Hyundai in this administrative review.\5\ This is the only rate determined in this review for individual respondents and, thus, should be applied to the three non-selected companies under section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. For a detailed discussion, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). \5\ See, e.g., Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) from Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 45124, 45124 (July 12, 2016), unchanged in Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) from Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 80640, 80641 (November 16, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ As AFA, we preliminarily assign Hyosung and Hyundai a dumping margin of 60.81 percent, an AFA rate used in the previous review. See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 13432 (March 13, 2017). This rate achieves the purpose of applying an adverse inference, i.e., it is sufficiently adverse to ensure that the uncooperative party does not obtain a more favorable result by failing to cooperate than if it had fully cooperated. According to 776(c)(2) of the Act, this rate does not require corroboration. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyosung Corporation..................................... 60.81 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd....................... 60.81 Iljin Electric Co., Ltd................................. 60.81 Iljin................................................... 60.81 LSIS Co., Ltd........................................... 60.81 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment Normally, the Department discloses the calculations performed in connection with preliminary results to interested parties within five days after the date of publication of this notice.\7\ Because the Department preliminarily applied total AFA to each of the mandatory respondents in this review, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, there are no calculations to disclose. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\8\ Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to the issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days from the deadline date for the submission of case briefs.\9\ Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\10\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\11\ Case and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties.\12\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). \11\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303. \12\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, [[Page 42291]] DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\13\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to publish the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If the preliminary results are unchanged for the final results, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 60.81 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the period of review which were produced and/or exported by Hyosung, Hyundai, and the aforementioned companies which were not selected for individual examination.\15\ We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Rate for Non- Selected Companies'' (for an explanation of how we preliminarily determined the rate for non-selected companies). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and Hyundai and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted- average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.\16\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 31, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference A. Application of Facts Available B. Use of Adverse Inference C. Selection and Corroboration of the Adverse Facts Available Rate V. Discussion of The Issues A. Hyosung-Specific Issues Failure to Report Separately Service- Related Revenues Invoice Used in last Period of Review (POR) Used in this POR for Different Sale Unreported Sales Adjustments B. Hyundai-Specific Issues Failure to Separately Report the Prices and Costs for Accessories Understatement of the Home Market Gross Unit Price Undisclosed Relationship with Hyundai's Sales Agent VI. Rate for Non-Selected Companies VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-18998 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2017 / Notices 42289
in their entirety through ACCESS by Dated: August 31, 2017. 35. Shangong Shuangwang Rubber Co., Ltd.
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Gary Taverman, 36. Shengtai Group Co., Ltd.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 37. Shouguang Firemax Tyre Co., Ltd.
Unless the deadline is extended 38. Southeast Mariner International Co., Ltd.
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 39. Tyrechamp Group Co., Limited
performing the non-exclusive functions and
Act, we intend to issue the final results duties of the Assistant Secretary for 40. Windforce Tyre Co., Limited
of this administrative review, including Enforcement and Compliance. 41. Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd.
the results of our analysis of the issues [FR Doc. 2017–18997 Filed 9–6–17; 8:45 am]
raised by the parties in their comments, Appendix I
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
within 120 days after issuance of these List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
preliminary results. Decision Memorandum
I. Summary DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit II. Background
Requirement III. Partial Rescission of Review International Trade Administration
IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review
In accordance with 19 CFR [A–580–867]
V. Scope of the Order
351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily VI. Application of the Countervailing Duty
Law to Imports from the PRC
Large Power Transformers From the
assigned subsidy rates in the amounts
VII. Diversification of the PRC’s Economy Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results
shown above for the producers/
VIII. Subsidies Valuation of Antidumping Duty Administrative
exporters shown above. Upon issuance Review; 2015–2016
IX. Interest Rate Benchmarks, Discount Rates,
of the final results, the Department shall Input, and Electricity Benchmarks
determine, and U.S. Customs and X. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, Application of Adverse Inferences International Trade Administration,
CVDs on all appropriate entries covered XI. Analysis of Programs Department of Commerce.
by this review. We intend to issue XII. Disclosure and Public Comment SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
XIII. Conclusion (the Department) is conducting an
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of Appendix II administrative review of the
review. For companies for which this antidumping duty order on large power
Non-Selected Companies Under Review
review is rescinded, the Department transformers (LPTs) from the Republic
1. American Pacific Industries, Inc. of Korea (Korea). The period of review
will instruct CBP to assess 2. BC Tyre Group Limited
countervailing duties on all appropriate is August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016.
3. Crown International Corporation
entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit 4. Fleming Limited The review covers five producers/
of estimated countervailing duties 5. Guangrao Taihua International Trade Co., exporters of the subject merchandise.
required at the time of entry, or Ltd. We preliminarily determine that
withdrawal from warehouse, for 6. Haohua Orient International Trade Ltd. Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung) and
7. Hong Kong Tiancheng Investment & Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.
consumption, during the period Trading Co., Limited (Hyundai), the two companies selected
December 1, 2014, through December 8. Jilin Jixing Tire Co., Ltd. for individual examination, sold subject
31, 2015, in accordance with 19 CFR 9. Kenda Rubber (China) Co., Ltd.
merchandise in the United States at
351.212(c)(l)(i). The Department intends 10. Liaoning Permanent Tyre Co., Ltd.
11. Macho Tire Corporation Limited prices below normal value during the
to issue appropriate assessment period of review. Interested parties are
instructions directly to CBP 15 days 12. Maxon Int’l Co., Limited
13. Qingdao Crown Chemical Co., Ltd. invited to comment on these
after publication of this notice. 14. Qingdao Goalstar Tire Co., Ltd. preliminary results.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 15. Qingdao Keter International Co., Limited DATES: Applicable September 7, 2017.
Act, the Department also intends to 16. Qingdao Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd.
17. Qingdao Nama Industrial Co., Ltd. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of Moses Song or John Drury, AD/CVD
18. Qingdao Odyking Tyre Co., Ltd.
estimated CVDs, in the amounts shown 19. Qingdao Sentury Tire Co., Ltd. Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
above for each of the respective 20. Qingzhou Detai International Trading Co., Compliance, International Trade
companies shown above, on shipments Ltd. Administration, U.S. Department of
of subject merchandise entered, or 21. Riversun Industry Limited Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
withdrawn from warehouse, for 22. Safe&Well (HK) International Trading NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
consumption on or after the date of Limited
23. Shandong Anchi Tyres Co., Ltd.
(202) 482–5041 or (202) 482–0195,
publication of the final results of this 24. Shandong Changhong Rubber Technology respectively.
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we Co., Ltd. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
will instruct CBP to continue to collect 25. Shandong Guofeng Rubber Plastics Co.,
cash deposits at the most-recent Ltd. Background
company-specific or all-others rate 26. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd.
The Department initiated this review
27. Shandong Hawk International Rubber
applicable to the company, as on October 14, 2016.1 We selected two
Industry Co., Ltd.
appropriate. These cash deposit 28. Shandong Hengyu Science & Technology mandatory respondents in this review,
requirements, when imposed, shall Co., Ltd.
remain in effect until further notice. 29. Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd. 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
30. Shandong Longyue Rubber Co., Ltd. Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
These preliminary results are issued 71061 (October 14, 2016) (Initiation Notice); see
31. Shandong New Continent Tire Co., Ltd.
and published in accordance with 32. Shandong Province Sanli Tire also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 78778, 78781
Manufactured Co., Ltd. (November 9, 2016) (Amended Initiation Notice).
Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 33. Shandong Yongtai Group Co., Ltd. We issued an amended Federal Register initiation
(formerly known as Shandong Yongtai notice on November 9, 2016, to reflect one company
Chemical Co., Ltd.) name that was missing from the October 14, 2016
34. Shandong Zhongyi Rubber Co., Ltd. Initiation Notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Sep 06, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_42461/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2017 / Notices 42291
DC 20230, at a date and time to be and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
determined.13 Parties should confirm producers or exporters will continue to
the date, time, and location of the be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, International Trade Administration
hearing two days before the scheduled the rate established in the investigation [A–570–909]
date. of this proceeding.16 These cash deposit
The Department intends to publish requirements, when imposed, shall Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
the final results of this administrative remain in effect until further notice. Republic of China: Preliminary Results
review, including the results of its of the Antidumping Duty
analysis of issues raised in any case or Notification to Importers
Administrative Review and Preliminary
rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days This notice also serves as a reminder Determination of No Shipments; 2015–
after publication of these preliminary 2016
to importers of their responsibility
results, unless extended.14
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Assessment Rates certificate regarding the reimbursement
International Trade Administration,
Upon completion of this of antidumping duties prior to
Department of Commerce.
administrative review, the Department liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
shall determine, and Customs and (the Department) preliminarily
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption determines that mandatory respondents
antidumping duties on all appropriate Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening
entries. If the preliminary results are that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent Systems Co., Ltd. and Stanley Black &
unchanged for the final results, we will Decker, Inc. (collectively Stanley), and
instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment of double antidumping
duties. Tianjin Lianda Group Co, Ltd. (Tianjin
assessment rate of 60.81 percent to all
Lianda) sold subject merchandise in the
entries of subject merchandise during Notification to Interested Parties United States at prices below normal
the period of review which were
value (NV) during the period of review
produced and/or exported by Hyosung, We are issuing and publishing this (POR), August 1, 2015, through July 31,
Hyundai, and the aforementioned notice in accordance with sections 2016. If these preliminary results are
companies which were not selected for 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. adopted in the final results, the
individual examination.15 We intend to
Dated: August 31, 2017. Department will instruct U.S. Customs
issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15
Gary Taverman, and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
days after publication of the final results
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping antidumping duties (AD) on all
of this review.
and Countervailing Duty Operations, appropriate entries of subject
Cash Deposit Requirements performing the non-exclusive functions and merchandise during the POR. Interested
The following cash deposit duties of the Assistant Secretary for parties are invited to comment on these
requirements will be effective upon Enforcement and Compliance. preliminary results.
publication of the final results of this Appendix DATES: Applicable September 7, 2017.
administrative review for all shipments FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
of the subject merchandise entered, or List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
Matthew Renkey or Courtney Canales,
withdrawn from warehouse, for AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
consumption on or after the publication I. Summary Enforcement and Compliance,
date of the final results of this II. Background International Trade Administration,
administrative review, as provided by III. Scope of the Order
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The IV. Application of Facts Available and Use of
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
cash deposit rate for Hyosung and Adverse Inference
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2312 or
Hyundai and other companies listed A. Application of Facts Available
B. Use of Adverse Inference
(202) 482–4997, respectively.
above will be equal to the weighted- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
C. Selection and Corroboration of the
average dumping margin established in
Adverse Facts Available Rate Background
the final results of this administrative
V. Discussion of The Issues
review; (2) for previously reviewed or A. Hyosung-Specific Issues Failure to On October 14, 2016, the Department
investigated companies not listed above, Report Separately Service-Related published in the Federal Register the
the cash deposit rate will continue to be Revenues Invoice Used in last Period of notice of initiation of an administrative
the company-specific rate published for Review (POR) Used in this POR for review of the AD order on certain steel
the most recently completed segment of Different Sale Unreported Sales nails (Nails) from the People’s Republic
this proceeding in which they were Adjustments of China (PRC) for the period of review
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm B. Hyundai-Specific Issues Failure to August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016.
covered in this review, a prior review, Separately Report the Prices and Costs The Department initiated a review with
or in the investigation but the producer for Accessories Understatement of the respect to 31 companies.1 The
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate Home Market Gross Unit Price
established for the most recently Undisclosed Relationship with 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
completed segment of this proceeding Hyundai’s Sales Agent Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
for the producer of the merchandise; VI. Rate for Non-Selected Companies 71064 (October 14, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
VII. Recommendation Although there were 32 companies in the initiation,
it included SDC International Australia Pty Ltd. Per
13 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). [FR Doc. 2017–18998 Filed 9–6–17; 8:45 am] the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to
14 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Voluntary Remand Order: SDC International Aust.
351.213(h). PTY. Ltd. v. United States, CIT Court No. 16–00062
15 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at (January 20, 2017), we found both SDC
‘‘Rate for Non-Selected Companies’’ (for an 16 See Large Power Transformers from the International Aust. Pty. Ltd. and SDC International
explanation of how we preliminarily determined Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR Australia Pty Ltd., to be the same company.
the rate for non-selected companies). 53177 (August 31, 2012). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Sep 06, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_42461/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-07 02:01:31
Document Modified: 2017-09-07 02:01:31
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable September 7, 2017. | |
| Contact | Moses Song or John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5041 or (202) 482-0195, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 42289 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR